Nuclear multipurpose submarine "Krasnoyarsk" project "Yasen-M" launched

The second serial multipurpose nuclear submarine "Krasnoyarsk" of the "Yasen-M" project was launched. The ceremony took place at Sevmash. This was reported by the press service of the Ministry of Defense.

According to the report, the solemn ceremony of launching the "Krasnoyarsk" was held in Severodvinsk today, July 30, 2021. The command to withdraw the submarine was given by the head of the enterprise Mikhail Budnichenko, the commander-in-chief of the Russian Navy Nikolay Evmenov thanked the shipbuilders and expressed confidence that the submarine would join fleet on time.

According to Evmenov, nuclear-powered submarines of the Yasen-M project ensure the combat stability of Russian strategic missile cruisers.

According to tradition, the future commander of the nuclear submarine, captain of the 2nd rank, Ivan Artyushin, broke a bottle of champagne on the side of the submarine.

The multipurpose nuclear submarine "Krasnoyarsk" is the second serial submarine of the Yasen-M project after the lead "Kazan" and the first serial "Novosibirsk". Laid down on July 27, 2014.

In addition to Krasnoyarsk, five more nuclear submarines of this project are currently at Sevmash at various stages of construction: Arkhangelsk (laid down on March 19, 2015), Perm (laid down on July 29, 2016), Ulyanovsk (laid down on 28 July 2017), Voronezh and Vladivostok (both laid down on July 20, 2020).

Comments

[Ratmir_Ryazan]

3 built, 5 under construction total Ash-M 8 pieces.

It will not be enough.

I hope they will order more.

[bk316]

As I understand it, 4 boats per fleet, 3 on duty, one is served.
Not enough of course.
And we still need new surface ships, at least coastal so that boats in fashion can safely go out.
And as far as I understand, ash trees should accompany Boreas, and we will have as many as 10 Boreans. So the series will probably continue.

[lucul]

Not enough of course.

Well, that is.
And to the submarine - a good journey and a long life.

[venik]

Quote: bk316

And as far as I understand, ash trees should accompany Boreas, and we will have as many as 10 Boreans. So the series will probably continue.

========
Perhaps, but not a fact .... Something there with "Laika / Husky" muddies. Maybe in addition to "Ash" will go.? But while there is something very cloudy ..... Will it be, or not? But 10 "strategists" need at least 20 multifunctional nuclear submarines.
Here, however, the situation is a little different: the "strategists" of the times of the USSR are very outdated both physically and morally (including ICBMs) .... And with multipurpose nuclear submarines, the situation is not yet so critical.

[bk316]

But 10 "strategists" need at least 20 multifunctional nuclear submarines.

Well, somewhere like that.
To understand what's wrong with the Husky, you have to be very much in the subject.
Floating is not my area. Therefore, I am not a niche.

[URAL72]

It is not enough, it is not enough, but also very expensive. We need Boreas with Caliber and Zircon on board instead of SLBMs. For both fleets, 6 ships at least. They are half the price. But Ash is needed in any case - he has other tasks.

[bk316]

We need Boreas with Caliber and Zircon on board instead of SLBMs

What is this for?
I understand a mace, but why load a strategist with calibers?
Chasing AUG?

[URAL72]

Then, that many strategists are not needed - the START-3 treaty does not allow. And to jump out of the water with Zircon is cheaper than building an IBM with the global superiority of the NATO fleets and the absence of air cover. There is no such air defense in Europe that can stop half a hundred Zircons and after a couple of dozen more Calibers. And this is with one nuclear submarine. Relatively not expensive (even to Ash) Borey is a great option. It will fit a lot, but you just need to replace the missile compartment, the rest will be from the SSBN.

[bk316]

And jump out of the water with zircon

With zircon at its range, you can shy away from your territory. Well, hummingbirds generally cover the whole of Europe
Only no one will do this by hitting missiles on the territory of NATO countries. This is a sure way to start the third world war.

[URAL72]

Your logic is very strange. In your opinion, it turns out that you do not need to build strategic Boreas. We're not going to start World War III. America spends $ 3 billion a year against the barmaley? No main enemy is still Russia. But we have much more tactical nuclear warheads than strategic ones, but the carriers are outdated. They need new rockets and launch platforms. The nuclear submarine fits perfectly. Ash trees. Boreas is half the price and can carry more.

[Cat Kuzya]

Actually, you really don't need to build anything. Seriously. You can generally reduce all armed forces to a minimum. And make ONE cobalt bomb (google what it is) - the Doomsday weapon. He blew it up, and on his own territory and really, "the whole world to dust."

[bk316]

In your opinion, it turns out that strategic Boreas do not need to be built.

Why not. They are being built.
They just need to be used as strategists, that is, with strategic nuclear weapons.
Whether to use them as carriers of TNW is a big question, BUT
is it somewhere stated and calibers and zircons with nuclear warheads?
Well, I'm not even saying that the Varshavyanka caliber can carry, can you imagine how many Varshavyanka women can be made instead of Borey alone?

[Ratmir_Ryazan]

Borey is cheaper because I think it is seriously inferior to Ash in anti-submarine capabilities.

Borey is essentially a platform for launching strategic missiles, and Yasen-M is a real hunter.

Therefore, the price is different.

At the same time, Borei should be built for cruise missiles, and not even in order to use them as carriers of a large number of cruise missiles, but so that in the event of another breakdown of the treaty by the United States, we can quickly convert them into strategists and not dominate in nuclear weapons from the outside. USA + NATO.

[bk316]

we could quickly convert them into strategists

This is a valuable thought, but first we must make the required number of them in strategic execution ...

[Ross xnumx]

Quote: URAL72

It is not enough, it is not enough, but also very expensive.

Not more expensive than the money withdrawn by our purchasers of public property through offshore companies and banks. In vain, the Central Bank spanked them, like sandboxes with fungi.

As specified, in 2020, capital outflow amounted to $ 28,9 billion против $ 23,3 billion for the first half of 2019. For the entire last year, the export of capital from the Russian Federation amounted to $ 26,7 billion, in 2018 - $ 63 billion

Now look here:

The Russian Ministry of Defense and the United Shipbuilding Corporation were able to agree on the cost of three submarines for the Navy, which the military will get at the actual cost. According to the Kommersant newspaper, citing a source familiar with the negotiations, within the framework of the agreement reached, the Project 885 Yasen nuclear submarine Severodvinsk will cost the Defense Ministry 47 billion rubles, and the submarines "Yuri Dolgoruky" and "Alexander Nevsky" project 955 "Borey" - in 23,2 billion rubles each.

Can you calculate how 2018 Severodvinsk ships sailed from Russia in 99?

[Sidor Amenpodestovich]

Quote: ROSS 42

Not more expensive than the money withdrawn by our purchasers of public property through offshore companies and banks.

Why are they obligatory offshore? The note from which you cited the quote only refers to the private sector, i.e. not state. It could well be non-residents who withdraw funds from our stock market. Well, so today they brought it out, tomorrow they will bring it in again. The dividend cut is always followed by a sell-off in stocks.
This is just an example! Otherwise, as usual, you will immediately rush to blame me for everything.

[Ross xnumx]

Quote: Sidor Amenpodestovich

Otherwise, as usual, you will immediately rush to blame me for everything.

Why blame you? You are not fucking with a team. This is who the main "resolver" is. And around him the tradesmen swarmed in a swarm.

[URAL72]

"Not more expensive than the money withdrawn by our acquirers of public property through offshore companies and banks. The Central Bank shouldn't have spanked them like sandboxes with fungi."

Honestly. I didn’t withdraw the money. I have never even been to the far abroad. And let's proceed from reality. You can theoretically win a billion in the lottery, but in practice you only have a salary. Why look for the guilty, - let’s wisely dispose of what we have. Most of all, money is withdrawn from China - there is a colossal amount, we have it, a trifle in comparison. There is an outflow of capital in all European countries, although it is easier to do business there and it is protected. Besides, no sanctions. The withdrawal of capital is not always evil - Russian companies are buying up business all over the world, even in Australia, Canada, USA, India. Beeline seems to have bought a small mobile operator in India - only 150 million subscribers. What is it for India? USC was going to buy a shipyard in the same place, with huge debts. Well, how do you want to enter someone else's market? Only in this way or through joint ventures like Gazprom for example. It looks like the economy is not yours - it doesn't matter. There are no people who know everything.

[alch3mist]

Can you calculate how 2018 Severodvinsk ships sailed from Russia in 99?

Whom are we going to put on these boats? Those nits that finish off our education are more dangerous than hamsters that take out money.

[ROSS_51]

Quote: ROSS 42

Can you calculate how 2018 Severodvinsk ships sailed from Russia in 99?

For full armament of the submarine, take as much as the boat itself costs. In addition, you seem to be confusing theft and the withdrawal of "investments", as we call them, but in fact, Western speculators who play on the stock exchange.

[venik]

Quote: URAL72

We need Boreas with Caliber and Zircon on board instead of SLBMs

========
Sorry! That's why there are "Ash" and "Varshavyanka" plus the modernized "Antei"! And SSBN - it is in Africa - SSBN! This is - marine BASIS of the strategic triad !!!

[Orange bigg]

Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan

3 built, 5 under construction total Ash-M 8 pieces.

It will not be enough.

I hope they will order more.

Severodvinsk completed project Yasen, Kazan, Novosibirsk, Krasnoyarsk project Yasen-M. They promised to start another 2.

.As the Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Navy Nikolay Evmenov noted at the launching ceremony of the Krasnoyarsk submarine, “the Russian oceanic Navy will be provided with the most modern and reliable nuclear submarines of the Yasen-M project for the long term.

According to representatives of the Ministry of Defense, the new submarines and ships that are now entering service with the Russian Navy have no analogues in the world.

"This will allow the Russian Navy to continue to effectively carry out the tasks of guaranteed prevention of any threats to the security of the state from sea and ocean directions," the Commander-in-Chief of the Navy said.

Earlier it was reported that the Russian Zircon hypersonic missile, which is planned to be installed on new submarines, after modernization increased the flight range by one and a half times - from 1000 to 1500 kilometers.

The new characteristics of the missile allow the Russian military to strike at enemy targets from a distance unattainable for aviation. The speed of the rocket is 8-9 times the speed of sound. To date, there are two versions of the Zircon cruise missile - the basic one, designed to destroy sea targets at distances of about 650-1000 kilometers, and the modernized one, designed to destroy enemy ground targets.

The modernized Zircon missile has a target engagement range of 1500 kilometers, which allows Russian naval ships to strike virtually any part of the United States from international waters. According to experts' forecasts, in the near future the Russian military may get into service not only a naval, but also an air version of the Zircon hypersonic missile.

https://newizv.ru/news/army/30-07-2021/novuyu-atomnuyu-podlodku-spustili-na-vodu-v-severodvinske

[bayard]

Quote: OrangeBigg

basic, designed to destroy sea targets at distances of the order of 650-1000 kilometers

This is just understandable, the GOS anti-ship missile system has weight and dimensions, and although no one has flown more than 450 km so far (from the officially announced test results), we will believe it for now.
Rђ RІRѕS,

Quote: OrangeBigg

The upgraded Zircon missile has a target engagement range of 1500 kilometers, which allows Russian naval ships to strike virtually any part of the United States from international waters.

This is due to what?
A lighter and simpler seeker and a lighter nuclear warhead instead of a warhead with an ordinary explosive in an anti-ship missile?
At the same time, it is hard to believe that the dimensions of the modernized rocket have been increased - there is a very complex calculated aerodynamics, it will not be possible to "simply lengthen" it.
And yet, 1500 km ... when not many states are capable of sending even a subsonic (!) KR at such a distance ...?
And so far, I repeat, it has not been reported officially about the launch at the maximum distance, this is most likely just a declared, but not confirmed range.

[bk316]

A lighter and simpler seeker and a lighter nuclear warhead instead of a warhead with an ordinary explosive in an anti-ship missile?

We read carefully.

any part of the USA

This is for static land targets, that is, without a seeker at all, but with nuclear warheads.

[bayard]

Quote: bk316

This is for static land targets, that is, without a seeker at all, but with nuclear warheads.

It is impossible without GOS. There should be a GOS by GLONAS, GBS or inertial + radar at the final site in the mapping mode.
But so far it's hard to believe - the known test ranges did not exceed 450 km.
But let's hope for the best.

[bk316]

There must be a GOS by GLONASS

When people talk about GOS, they usually don't mean GPS.
For anyone that the inertial, that the GPS does not weigh anything.

[bayard]

This is a very vulnerable guidance system to interference in military conditions. Therefore, they usually try to combine inertial and radar with the mapping mode.

[bk316]

Then it will be much harder.
The inertial is not subject to interference at all, here the question is whether its accuracy is enough. RL with cartography is already much harder.

[bayard]

We have been able to deceive the GPS navigator for a long time and have demonstrated this more than once, I think the Americans can do that too.
In any case, the GOS for the anti-ship missile and the GOS for work on stationary objects by weight will differ greatly in favor of the latter (in terms of weight efficiency). Hence the greater range of such missiles compared to anti-ship missiles.
It is justifiable to hit the ground with "Zircon" only in the first - a disarming strike, hitting air defense / missile defense objects, airfields, command centers, naval base (in nuclear equipment, of course) and other most promising targets.
And already in the second wave, longer-range, low-altitude and inconspicuous subsonic missile launchers should go. And take out all the military, industrial and civilian infrastructure.

[bk316]

We have long been able to deceive the GPS navigator

I wrote about the inertial, GPS does not seem to work at all in the event of a big war.

It is justifiable to hit the ground with "Zircon" only in the first - disarming strike, hitting air defense / missile defense objects

The stump is clear.

[Michael67]

Happy sailing! Seven feet under the keel and a fair wind! And so that the number of dives is equal to the number of ascents.

[Piramidon]

Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan

It will not be enough

As always, there is a comment on duty in the forefront.

[Maz]

Urrrah! A thousand feet under the keel! Good luck!

[Alex968m]

It's time for the Husky to start building! Ash is already old.

[Russian German]

7 feet under the keel!

[Wedmak]

For a submarine, preferably 700! So that there was where to dive!

[Bashkirkhan]

Quote: Russian German

7 feet under the keel!

For nuclear submarines, the wish of 7 feet under the keel is quite incorrect.
The event is definitely significant. Probably another couple of years will be spent on completion, physical launch of a nuclear power plant, factory sea trials + state tests.

[Mouse]

So our Krasnoyark was honored .... he cannot walk in the depths of the sea!

[Popandos]

According to tradition, the future commander of the nuclear submarine broke a bottle of champagne on the side of the submarine

According to tradition, the crew broke more than one bottle against everything that protrudes from the hull.

[Alien From]

Congratulations to the factory workers! Good service to the boat and sailors

[Tests]

Popandos (Tim), dear, before the screw of ordering the coca, the boats were thrown up, on "one or two", personally Budnichenko and Evmenov? Or a boat commander? And the retractable fence, sort of, protrudes from the body. In order to break a bottle of champagne about him, someone from the crew should not stand in the ranks at the train berth, but agree with one of the crane operators and sit in the cabin of one of the workshop's overhead cranes. And on this order, flashlights, bright glasses of different colors, protrude from the body. In Severodvinsk, after the white nights from August 01, the street lighting will be turned on, and the ship in the water area of ​​the Northern Dvina is always supposed to have running lights in good order, even in winter, even in summer ... Zhenya Baranov has known for many years, he seems to have removed the most from the NSR documentary footage on various film and video cameras from the beginning of the 70s of the 20th century, but even he did not tell that someone from the boat crews jumped to horizontal rudders and broke bottles of champagne about them when launching an order ... after all, they also protrude from the body ...
And the press service of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation should once again be carved on the square in public. It is necessary to write this: "According to tradition, a bottle of champagne on the side of the submarine was smashed by the future commander of the nuclear submarine, Captain 2nd Rank Ivan Artyushin." ... Interestingly, these representatives of the "second oldest profession" know when the crew of the nuclear submarine is formed and the commander of the boat is appointed?

[Sands Careers General]

More nuclear submarines, good and different, so that Western "partners" are afraid to fart in our direction

[alystan]

Great news and very nice to see the happy faces of the factory workers!
But there is a question, maybe a little off topic, was no one embarrassed by what Evmenov had on his head?
What kind of saddle? Is he a military man by training? Or the same as Taburetkin?
Although, what have I forgotten about the current Ministry of Defense? It was with him and on his head that something similar to Junker's headdresses first appeared? For a day who has not served Shoigu, it may be forgivable, but for a naval officer, it's just a shame!
But, now I just remembered a shot from the recent naval parade on the Day of the Navy in St. Petersburg, where everyone sitting on the sides of the Commander-in-Chief had a classic cut and uniform.
Then what did he wear today for such a solemn occasion?
And who else can enlighten who are the three admirals who were sitting at that moment on the left side of the GDP? It just became interesting, because they were like triplets + still small, like a Nakhimovite, who had worn out among them and looked like an article on them. Coincidence or family dynasty?

[Alex968m]

How long can you drive this aging ash tree !!! It's time to start building the Husky !!!