The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation will receive the first batch of T-80BVM tanks this year

78

The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation will receive the first batch this year from the Omsk Transport Machine Building Plant Omsktransmash, which is part of the Uralvagonzavod concern. tanks T-80BVM. This version of the T-80, which is produced only at this enterprise, is equipped with gas turbine engines.

This was announced today by the press service of the plant.



The message indicates that the equipment was sent in accordance with the state defense order. How many tanks the military will receive is not specified.

Before shipment, the quality of the dispatched armored vehicles, the condition of its mechanisms and systems, and compliance with the required characteristics were checked. Prior to that, the car was tested only in the cold season, and recently it passed summer tests. During the check, the tank crossed a specially built reservoir for this and made a march of five thousand kilometers.

T-80BVM have proven themselves excellently in recent years; they have an undeniable advantage when operating at low temperatures. This year we have proved that they are combat-ready in any other conditions.

- said the general director of the enterprise Igor Lobov.

The combat vehicle is a modernized version of the T-80BV tank, superior to its predecessor in firepower, protection and maneuverability. She began to enter the troops in 2019.


The previous batch was shipped by the Omsktransmash plant in December last year. Before shipment, it was also thoroughly tested in the workshop and in field tests.
78 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    27 July 2021 09: 25
    Such kindness and more ...
    1. +3
      27 July 2021 10: 05
      March for 5 thousand km ?! They drove to anapa and back
      1. +5
        27 July 2021 10: 44
        In fact, the T-80 was tested in Turkmenistan during the Soviet Union. It is not only hot there, but also very fine sand, which is very harmful for gas turbine engines.
    2. Maz
      +3
      27 July 2021 11: 48
      Oh, they are expensive, but good, but expensive.
      1. +4
        27 July 2021 13: 59
        Not more expensive than money. The army needs good equipment. hi
        1. Maz
          +1
          27 July 2021 14: 54
          This is understandable, but its price is 800 against 000 for the T-200, these are the prices of the USSR. now prices have increased even more.
          1. +4
            27 July 2021 16: 06
            We are talking about modernized tanks.
            They are not made anew, but taken from storage. hi
      2. +1
        28 July 2021 17: 51
        the price of modernization is comparable to the price of modernization of T-72b3m
  2. -3
    27 July 2021 09: 33
    And the protection of the chassis is not provided for them at all? Or is it hung on the sides at the end of transportation?
    1. +9
      27 July 2021 09: 46
      And the protection of the chassis is not provided for them at all? Or is it hung on the sides at the end of transportation?

      Most likely removed during transportation.
      1. -4
        27 July 2021 10: 17
        Quote: V1er

        Most likely removed during transportation.


        And then how?
        1. -4
          27 July 2021 13: 08
          .. "You don’t understand, this is different .."))) In the case of exercises and any other nix, no one will take off the protection from the sides, regardless of the "road dimensions", I think .. To whom the designers are also not the first time married - all sizes have long been known and should be included in the project .. Therefore, it is not clear ..))
        2. +3
          27 July 2021 13: 17
          Quote: SovAr238A
          And then how?

          And these are ceremonial photos of the press service of the RF Ministry of Defense.
          Modernized T-80BVM tanks, received for the re-equipment of the tank battalion of the 64th separate motorized rifle brigade of the 35th combined arms army of the Eastern Military District in the village of Knyaze-Volkonskoye (Khabarovsk Territory), April 2021

          The plant ships the T-80BVM with dismantled side skirts - as shown in the photo in the article. By the way, brackets for attaching screens are visible on it.
      2. +3
        27 July 2021 13: 09
        So this is a parade ... there and the shoes on the tracks are glued ..))
    2. +10
      27 July 2021 09: 47
      Colleague, everything is there. It's just that during the railway transportation the bulwarks are removed. exceed the dimensions. After unloading, they are put in place.
  3. +3
    27 July 2021 09: 35
    It would be nice to give in the material a link to the Military Review article on this modernization. https://topwar.ru/138277-t-80bvm-staryy-tank-s-novymi-vozmozhnostyami.html
  4. -7
    27 July 2021 09: 36
    The cars are good.
    It is high time for them to hike ... to the English Channel.
    Through Ukraine, the Baltic States, Poland ........
    1. +12
      27 July 2021 09: 40
      And what to do there?
      1. +1
        27 July 2021 09: 50
        Liberate Russian lands and conclude the Yalta-3 treaty.
        1. -1
          27 July 2021 09: 55
          Are you ready to go in the front row?
          1. +7
            27 July 2021 09: 56
            And I'm not in the last ...
            1. -5
              27 July 2021 09: 58
              Well, then it is accepted. And the women are still giving birth.
              1. +10
                27 July 2021 10: 47
                Quote: Yamamoto
                And the women are still giving birth.

                Japanese something? Perhaps, but not a fact. request
                1. -8
                  27 July 2021 10: 52
                  Glory to Toru, the Japs are not yet determined to rock the boat, and if they rock the boat, then most likely they will not use the "women still give birth" tactics, the mentality is not the same. But they are building a good fleet, unlike us, and this really annoys me, frankly speaking. Of course, this is not yet a general domination, as before the Second World War, but so far everything is moving towards this recourse
                  1. 0
                    27 July 2021 14: 03
                    Zircon will calm everyone. Both them and you. Soon. wink
                    1. -5
                      27 July 2021 14: 46
                      In order for Zircon to have ghostly chances of hitting the target, preliminary naval reconnaissance, tracking and target designation are needed. How are you going to carry out all this? Any ideas?
                      1. +2
                        27 July 2021 16: 16
                        Without going into details - the Bastion is guided and the Zircon is perfectly guided.
                        All will be well. hi
                      2. -2
                        27 July 2021 16: 20
                        comparing a tank with a projectile for a tank is a very big sadness ((I suspect that you have an idea of ​​naval reconnaissance and target designation at about zero, so there is nothing to talk about recourse
                      3. +1
                        27 July 2021 16: 56
                        Scrupulousness Prize:
                        https://lenta.ru/news/2021/06/29/liana/
                        wink
                      4. -6
                        27 July 2021 17: 05
                        4 satellites? )) Not funny yourself?
                        Do you know what their coverage area and orbital period are?
                        Even our sworn partners, who have an order of magnitude more satellites, will not be able to give out COs online for real purposes soon. I am already silent about cloudy weather and a bunch of conditions when such a system cannot be applied a priori.
                        In general, I do not like to talk about the same thing and repeat myself a hundred times, so come here, read my correspondence on the Central Command with a man who, just like you, sacredly and childishly believes that one anti-ship missile can easily destroy a sea target ... But I warn you right away that he tried to argue, but on the last argument - he calmed down, and quietly merged)
                        https://topwar.ru/185189-pidzhak-dlja-samuraev-pidzhak-smiritelnaja-rubaha-zhargonnoe.html#comment-id-11652566
                      5. +1
                        27 July 2021 18: 05
                        You are recently on the site. I looked at all your correspondence. Good luck in your exploits. wink
                      6. -1
                        27 July 2021 20: 53
                        thank you) Yes, you are right, I really have been on topvar recently, and I have been fond of naval topics for a long time. And what - is there a semblance of hazing on the site, what is the attitude to recent users?
                      7. +3
                        27 July 2021 21: 19
                        The site has well-known authors and many topics have long been chewed by old-timers to the gnashing of teeth.
                        The topic of the CD guidance is one of them wink
                        And I still found her at Morskoy, when it was possible to get some hints from real specialists how everything really is. Now and there, no one seriously says anything. For obvious reasons. hi
                      8. The comment was deleted.
                      9. -2
                        27 July 2021 17: 21
                        Will the victory be won?
                        The bastion is provided with target designation by coastal reconnaissance and detection equipment, I would like to see patrol aircraft and UAVs in the coastal line ... But Zircon can and should shoot beyond the radar radius of ships ... time ... In addition to satellites that supposedly see something, there is nothing ... The problem of targeting, the problem of monitoring controlled areas, border sections in real time - this is the main problem in the Russian Armed Forces, this is its "Achilles heel" ...
                      10. -2
                        27 July 2021 17: 48
                        I completely and absolutely agree, for which immediately plus) Actually, that's what I'm talking about.
                        Sorry, but negative, like any other rating - it doesn't matter to me request
                      11. +1
                        27 July 2021 18: 19
                        Colleague Volkof formerly known as vo3a etc. have been on the site for a long time, so he knows its rules and gives you advice. I wonder why he changes his nicknames? bully
                      12. +1
                        27 July 2021 18: 08
                        Klimov and Timokhin have completely rolled out this topic.
                        After them, no one will be surprised with anything.
                        Judging by your other nicknames, you have been visiting VO for a long time and you know these colleagues.
                        Throwing in to educate strangers is a thankless task. wink
                        But Zircon can and should shoot beyond the radar radius of ships

                        For Japan, everything is enough. After all, since Yamamoto this was discussed. wink
                      13. -3
                        27 July 2021 17: 44
                        I have ideas, I have suggestions ... First, get out of the negative rating, it will not be difficult for you, but for now, stop giving harsh assessments, even though they are correct ...
                      14. +1
                        29 July 2021 22: 32
                        Quote: Yamamoto
                        In order for Zircon to have ghostly chances of hitting the target, preliminary naval reconnaissance, tracking and target designation are needed. How are you going to carry out all this? Any ideas?

                        https://topwar.ru/185189-pidzhak-dlja-samuraev-pidzhak-smiritelnaja-rubaha-zhargonnoe.html#comment-id-11652566
                        You will not deny that the author of the article said the same thing as me? wink
                  2. +1
                    28 July 2021 17: 53
                    and the use of the fleet in ground operations? Not to mention the futility of waging a war against Russia
        2. -2
          27 July 2021 16: 59
          Which of you named - Through Ukraine, the Baltic States, Poland - "Russian lands"?
      2. -3
        27 July 2021 10: 05
        Maybe this Zhirik wants to ride the ball? Better to let him walk.
    2. +3
      27 July 2021 11: 15
      It is high time for them to hike ... to the English Channel.
      Through Ukraine, the Baltic States, Poland .......

      Again to feed all these shrill loafers ?? belay Why don't you love us so much? what

      The same Poland - we had the fucking happiness of owning twice in our history - do we really have to step on this rake for the third time? No - now, thank God, this is the cross of the European Union, they should bear it ..
      1. -2
        27 July 2021 12: 29
        Why feed? Enough with them and contributions.
        It is also time to pay off all debts with the European Union, since the First World War we owe it ...
        Yes, and without the English Channel we cannot conclude Yalta-3 in any way.
        1. +2
          27 July 2021 14: 06
          Yes, and without the English Channel we cannot conclude Yalta-3 in any way.

          As long as there is a choice does not pay the price of Yalta - it is better not to pay it.
          And we have this choice with the NSW. So let's not rush. hi
    3. +2
      27 July 2021 11: 24
      Quote: prior
      The cars are good.
      It is high time for them to hike ... to the English Channel.
      Through Ukraine, the Baltic States, Poland ........

      I put it +, but we don't need a sexless geyrope at all.
    4. -3
      27 July 2021 13: 04
      Javelins there are already in store for them in abundance .. - they missed the moment however ..
  5. +1
    27 July 2021 09: 37
    And a tower from t90a-t90m ​​to eighty is interesting or not? With such a tower, the tank would be excellent in general
    1. +5
      27 July 2021 10: 11
      The t-90m and t-80bvm have different loading mechanisms, I will not say that I was not interested in the turret ring.
      1. +2
        27 July 2021 10: 31
        Thanks for the answer drinks
    2. +3
      27 July 2021 10: 48
      And the tower from t90a-t90m ​​to eighty is interesting or not? "

      What for? The MSA, including the sights, is the same - Sosna-U. Cannon too.
      1. +1
        27 July 2021 11: 05
        The t90m tower has much better kinetic resistance
    3. +2
      27 July 2021 13: 20
      Quote: -sa-
      And the tower from t90a-t90m ​​to the eighty is interesting or not?

      I suppose that this option is possible. Only on this tower it is necessary to install an MZ native to the T-80 (T-64), it is a cabin type, it is fixed to the tower (on the T-72-90 the conveyor is attached to the bottom, which is reinforced with additional stiffeners). I don’t know the diameter of the turret ring, but I think it’s the same, since the roots of our tanks go from the T-64, with the same gun, there is no reason to increase or decrease it.
  6. +2
    27 July 2021 09: 49
    "T-80BVM have proven themselves excellently in recent years" ...
    This makes me happy !
    And the fact that they are going to the troops is also great!
  7. +6
    27 July 2021 09: 58
    I always read one - t80 bmw? wassat
    1. -3
      27 July 2021 10: 27
      No) I read it too drinks
  8. +2
    27 July 2021 10: 25
    And when will the T-14 be shipped by wagons?
    1. +4
      27 July 2021 10: 31
      why, here a fresh zelebot has unsubscribed that it is not necessary already, tanks are the third echelon
    2. 0
      27 July 2021 16: 43
      And in the case of the start of the database.
  9. +1
    27 July 2021 16: 17
    Quote: Yamamoto
    I think we won't have to fight NATO

    Precisely, because the logical result in such a case is the use of nuclear weapons. This scenario does not suit either side.
    1. 0
      29 July 2021 12: 43
      application of nuclear weapons

      I am convinced that the reason is not only this, but rather it is completely different)
      The whole world in dust and glass Washington wants only a handful of jingoistic patriots, moreover, the couch, I do not even agree that they are classified as patriots. Moreover, I am sure that these couch rooms were not holding weapons in their hands or were under fire, but their loved ones did not die before their very eyes. I am 100% sure that only such people can want to glass and turn the world into a nuclear desert. Who know about war and death from cartoons sad
  10. -2
    27 July 2021 19: 02
    That is why, "Armata" will never be in the army !!! - in the warehouses There is still a lot of Soviet stuff that can be "modernized"! )))
  11. +1
    27 July 2021 19: 49
    The CBO should be completely re-equipped with these tanks. And besides tanks, this base should have ARVs, BMOs, BMPTs, etc. I have such an opinion.
    1. +1
      27 July 2021 22: 13
      This is a normal opinion, balanced)
      1. +1
        28 July 2021 21: 55
        O! wrote that I was normal! And then the wife says that he is preoccupied!)))
  12. The comment was deleted.
  13. +1
    28 July 2021 10: 38
    Quote: konstantin68
    Quote: kibo
    The army needs UAVs of all types, up to the level of the zod, barrage and high-precision ammunition, normal communication means of all levels,

    No one has ever managed to "bomb out" the enemy. Only the infantry solved the tasks of conquering and controlling territories. So the tanks will live for a long time.

    Well, what about without hordes of UAVs. This is a favorite theme of our former compatriots, which others, through thoughtlessness, pick up on.