The United States announced its intention to "seek" from Moscow and Beijing to reduce nuclear arsenals

72

The United States intends to "seek" a reduction in the nuclear arsenals of Russia and China. The corresponding statement was made by the new deputy head of the State Department for arms control and international security Bonnie Jenkins.

Jenkins, who took office, pledged to "reduce the risk of nuclear war" through effective arms control on her Twitter page. She also intends to seek to reduce the nuclear arsenal of Russia and China - the main geopolitical opponents of the United States. At the same time, not a word about the reduction of the US nuclear arsenal. Apparently this, in her opinion, looks like the American version of global strategic stability.



I am determined to reduce the risk of nuclear war through effective arms control, limitation of nuclear (potentials - approx.) Russia and China, (...)

Jenkins said, adding that Washington needs to strengthen its position in Europe and Asia to contain "growing threats."



Jenkins did not explain what methods the new US Undersecretary of State intends to achieve from Moscow and Beijing, but promised to provide new initiatives on strategic stability in the near future.

By the way, at the forthcoming consultations between Russia and the United States on strategic stability in Geneva, scheduled for July 28, the American delegation will be headed by Bonnie Jenkins. Russian - Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov. Probably, it is there that she will begin attempts to "reduce" the Russian nuclear potential.
72 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +25
    26 July 2021 07: 47
    Bonnie's wisdom is off the charts. To force the RF and the PRC to disarm, the RF and the PRC need to be disarmedwassat
    1. +15
      26 July 2021 07: 57
      - to strengthen its positions in Europe and Asia in order to contain "growing threats".
      And who will protect Cuba and Venezuela from the growing threat?
      - At the same time, not a word about the reduction of the US nuclear arsenal.
      And also France and Cycling Britain.
      1. +5
        26 July 2021 08: 12
        I am determined to reduce the risk of nuclear war through effective arms control, limitation of nuclear (potentials - approx.) Russia and China, (...)

        As far as I understand, she "could not" pronounce the word "potentials" laughing
        But he knows exactly how to reduce the risk of nuclear war ... No, but what
        1. avg
          +1
          26 July 2021 10: 27
          According to her, the Chinese and the Russians will wash her feet and immediately rush to reduce various (well, how are they there ...) potentials.
          1. +1
            26 July 2021 12: 40
            The United States announced its intention to "seek" from Moscow and Beijing to reduce nuclear arsenals

            Would dry up in Washington with its nuclear disarmament only for Moscow and Beijing in favor of the United States!
            Under Gorbachev and EBN this UNILATERAL nuclear disarmament of Russia in favor of the USA The USSR and Russia have already passed!
            Suffice it to recall the "Chernomyrdin-Gore nuclear deal" on the symbolic sale and transfer by Russia of practically all of its nuclear stockpiles to the United States.
            This will never happen again - all the more so with the cunning withdrawal of the United States from the Open Skies Treaty (DON)!
            1. 0
              26 July 2021 16: 02
              Hello, Tatyana!
              Our leadership has long stated that the withdrawal of the United States from the ABM Treaty put an end to further reductions in strategic offensive arms.
              Instead of somehow sensibly reacting to this, Trump withdrew from the INF and UN Treaties, which finally finished off all prospects, even just to talk.
              Biden cannot return the States to the 3 canceled Treaties. Even if he himself suddenly strongly wanted it.
              Therefore, there will be no more nuclear disarmaments.
              And no one will ever believe the States at their word. hi
              Suffice it to recall the "Chernomyrdin-Gore nuclear deal" on the symbolic sale and transfer by Russia of practically all of its nuclear stockpiles to the United States.

              It was not an easy deal.
              Our Rosatom now occupies a leading position in the world, including thanks to this deal.
              And the States relaxed and gave us the opportunity to gather strength. Not finished off in the 90s. hi
              https://regnum.ru/news/polit/2194564.html
              1. 0
                26 July 2021 17: 06
                Good afternoon, Alexander!
                Quote: Alex777

                Suffice it to recall the "Chernomyrdin-Gore nuclear deal" on the symbolic sale and transfer by Russia of practically all of its nuclear stockpiles to the United States.
                It was not an easy deal.

                Unfortunately, this was a condition for the United States to recognize the independence of the former Soviet republics: Ukraine, Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, etc. - with the collapse of the USSR and the colonial-parasitic sucking of their economies by transnational companies of the United States and the collective West. I don't see anything good in this.
                Our Rosatom now occupies a leading position in the world, including thanks to this deal.
                And the States relaxed and gave us the opportunity to gather strength. Not finished off in the 90s.
                https://regnum.ru/news/polit/2194564.html
                This is just for now. Time passes - and everything changes.
                More and more countries in the world possess nuclear weapons.
                1. 0
                  26 July 2021 17: 14
                  Possession of nuclear weapons is a very expensive pleasure.
                  It is not enough to do it, running into various sanctions.
                  Only Pakistan is lucky in this respect.
                  And that's because India was doing the same.
                  And when it was done, it must be properly stored / protected, and the delivery vehicle kept in order.
                  All of this requires infrastructure, trained and reliable personnel, and decent annual costs. hi
                  Who else, besides Iran, is now thinking about nuclear weapons, I do not even know.
                  1. 0
                    26 July 2021 18: 01
                    As the Jews like to emphasize, "we have no nuclear weapons, but if anything, we will definitely use them!"
                    1. 0
                      26 July 2021 18: 31
                      So they did it a long time ago.
                      And I mean here and now. hi
    2. +4
      26 July 2021 08: 10
      Which one is in the photo? Who knows? Not one that obviously eats well?
      1. +4
        26 July 2021 08: 26
        The same dream of the poet
        1. +5
          26 July 2021 08: 48
          Then she clearly has something to cut!
          1. +6
            26 July 2021 08: 51
            She will only build up wassat
      2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +4
      26 July 2021 09: 27
      Bonnie's wisdom is off the charts.

      Will recruit nerds from ads ...
      1. +8
        26 July 2021 09: 41
        Quote: paul3390
        Bonnie's wisdom is off the charts.

        Will recruit nerds from ads ...

        Not, not by an ad, but by a quota for blacks. Yes
      2. 0
        26 July 2021 09: 55
        What to do if there are only nerds around.
      3. +1
        26 July 2021 10: 23
        Quote: paul3390
        Bonnie's wisdom is off the charts.

        Will recruit nerds from ads ...

        These are cretins, what you need cretins! "Talking Head"! Where it grows from, let's keep quiet.
  2. +11
    26 July 2021 07: 52
    let the US reduce the army by 2 times, and the bases from Europe. Japan and South Korea will withdraw only then it will be possible to sit down to discuss the reduction
    1. +1
      26 July 2021 08: 26
      Unfortunately, so far no one is raising the question. And Europe and the countries, clients do not realize in their brains the arrival to them at a dangerous time and the landing of nuclear warheads from the Russian Federation and China.
  3. +8
    26 July 2021 07: 52
    The United States intends to "seek" a reduction in the nuclear arsenals of Russia and China.
    Another Merikatos dog showed up. Each louse is trying to build something out of itself, and jump above the previous one. laughing
  4. +9
    26 July 2021 07: 53
    The United States announced its intention to "seek" from Moscow and Beijing to reduce nuclear arsenals
    ... Reducing nuclear arsenals is a business .... useful, BUT, negotiating with SCHULER is fraught with .... we have already gone through this.
    1. +2
      26 July 2021 08: 23
      Quote: rocket757
      ... Reducing nuclear arsenals is a business ... useful, BUT, negotiating with SCHULER is fraught with ... we have already gone through this

      Yes, there is nothing to talk about with cheaters. Only by putting the revolver to the head.
      1. +4
        26 July 2021 08: 37
        Yntot sharper is not a petty riffraff, in content and fact ...
        the fact that they are now rushing to and fro is not an agony, a state from which they can move to any stage, even to the one that few people like.
        Time, now only time will show in which direction the events will unfold.
        1. +4
          26 July 2021 08: 57
          They have enough worries now, let them be marked ...
          1. +1
            26 July 2021 09: 16
            Hi soldier
            The country is big ... their "minor problems", someone else, smaller, would be rolled into a pancake ... and they will flutter, shudder and from that many will tremble in many places.
            So then we should look carefully and pick up in time what they cannot keep ... only in our interests, nothing else.
            1. +4
              26 July 2021 09: 21
              In the United States, a new weekly record of shooting incidents was recorded - from July 17 to 23, 915 incidents occurred, 430 people were killed and 1 were injured. This was reported by the NBC News channel with reference to the organization Gun Violence Archive, which calculates the facts of the opening of fire.
              Source: https://rusvesna.su/news/1627249283


              They have "fun" there, you will laugh too much ...
    2. +7
      26 July 2021 08: 56
      Quote: rocket757
      The United States announced its intention to "seek" from Moscow and Beijing to reduce nuclear arsenals
      ... Reducing nuclear arsenals is a business .... useful, BUT, negotiating with SCHULER is fraught with .... we have already gone through this.


      Greetings hi

      They are a priori incapable of negotiation ...
      1. +3
        26 July 2021 09: 18
        Quote: cniza
        They are a priori incapable of negotiation ...

        So many understand this, BUT .... they will not dare to say it out loud, but they are always ready to hiss in our direction.
        Time will put everything in its place.
        1. +4
          26 July 2021 09: 22
          On this they will destroy their empire, and rightly so ...
          1. +2
            26 July 2021 09: 32
            All empires are destroyed, usually from within.
            There is nothing unusual about that.
            By the way, declaring oneself to be eternal is also in line with traditions, but nothing changes from that, everything falls apart.
            1. +4
              26 July 2021 09: 41
              Yes, eternal, exceptional - this is the sign of the sunset ...
  5. +3
    26 July 2021 07: 56
    winked I wonder how? Everything is puffed up by the old "hegemon". He pretends to be an alpha male, and the "building material" has long worn out. laughing
  6. +7
    26 July 2021 07: 56
    The United States announced its intention to "seek" from Moscow and Beijing to reduce nuclear arsenals

    Yes Only by our own example with the elimination of military blocs and military bases around the world.
    1. +2
      26 July 2021 10: 54
      In the first stage, "BIOLABARATORIES" were built all over the world, not to mention chemical weapons.
  7. +1
    26 July 2021 08: 04
    Most likely, sanctions will be imposed on people and firms associated with nuclear weapons, and, possibly, nuclear energy in general.
    1. +2
      26 July 2021 08: 25
      They have been around for a long time. It remains to follow the path of Israel and begin to hunt for nuclear physicists and designers of the BR.
  8. +5
    26 July 2021 08: 08
    I am determined to reduce the risk of nuclear war through effective arms control, limiting the nuclear potential of Russia and China, ..

    The black woman decided to promote herself in a new position. To promote this topic seriously, you need to start with the United States. Neither Russia nor China has nuclear weapons in other countries. And the United States has its nuclear weapons in: Germany, Italy, Belgium, Holland, Turkey.
    (some of them were taken from Turkey to Germany).
    1. +1
      26 July 2021 10: 55
      And Romania and Poland?
  9. +6
    26 July 2021 08: 12
    There are two options: either in the US nuclear arsenal, everything is very bad with warheads and they are stupidly afraid that a bolt will be put on them, or the US hopes to deceive the Russian Federation and China again by reducing their arsenals and increasing their groups of forces on the borders of these states. Or maybe both at the same time.
    And as an addition: the United States will seek to reduce and stop the supply of the latest weapons to Russia and China.
    1. +4
      26 July 2021 08: 23
      Rather, give beads in exchange for something. The last honest reduction was at the time of the deployment of the MRBM in Cuba.
      1. +2
        26 July 2021 08: 24
        Yes, they are experts in beads ..
  10. +2
    26 July 2021 08: 22
    With one hand, the United States is close to deploying MRBMs in Asia ... with the other, they are disarming the Russian Federation and China. Where is the connection here?
    1. +1
      26 July 2021 10: 47
      Everything is logical. They want to be able to carry out a sudden, unrequited nuclear strike anywhere in the world. Russia and China are hindering them in this, and they can even beat them in the face. That's the whole connection.
      1. 0
        26 July 2021 12: 39
        So, from the next appearance of the Russian MRBM in Asia ... and if the EU is not smart enough, then in the European part of the Russian Federation.
  11. +4
    26 July 2021 08: 26
    What another American nonsense
    The Americans have recently withdrawn from all kinds of nuclear arms control treaties. On what basis will China and Russia reduce their nuclear weapons?
  12. +2
    26 July 2021 08: 26
    In the United States, a new "topic" is the reduction of nuclear potential. The gas pipeline was deflated. We took on something else. Americans are obsessed with their "exclusiveness" like chubaty - with embroidered shirts and bacon.
  13. +4
    26 July 2021 08: 34
    If the United States started talking about the desire to limit the nuclear potentials of the countries of potential adversaries, then by this they actually admit their lag in this area. In any case, there will be attempts at pressure and deception.
  14. +3
    26 July 2021 08: 39
    I am determined to reduce the risk of nuclear war through effective arms control, limiting nuclear (potentials - approx.) Russia and China

    They'd rather pay attention to themselves. American missile defense upsets the nuclear balance. The United States has significantly more aircraft and ships than Russia and China, capable of carrying nuclear weapons.
  15. +6
    26 July 2021 08: 55
    At the same time, not a word about the reduction of the US nuclear arsenal. Apparently this, in her opinion, looks like the American version of global strategic stability.


    Well, the United States has democratic nuclear weapons ...
  16. +3
    26 July 2021 09: 08
    They are so spiteful in public. The late Churkin opened this whole kitchen of negotiations of the UN Security Council. First, a negotiating room, with tea and coffee. Where they culturally discuss a document without cameras. But at a meeting under cameras, it rushed. But the result is already known, at least go hand-to-hand with candelabra and teapots. I suspect there will be a trial balloon. Russia and China should abandon HyperPuper Rockets, because the United States does not have them, and this is not democratic. What will be sent by the forest. Ryabkov and this little black girl at the same table, I can’t imagine. She thinks if she’s black, then everyone should kneel? She’s deeply mistaken! Very deep! good
  17. -1
    26 July 2021 09: 09
    New initiatives from this little black deputy commander-in-law. Who needs them?
  18. +1
    26 July 2021 09: 12
    Nah guys, we've been through this before. Now start with yourself - cut your weapons into metal, as we once did, and then we will think ...
    1. 0
      26 July 2021 22: 59
      Quote: dimy44
      Nah guys, we've been through this before. Now start with yourself - cut your weapons into metal, as we once did, and then we will think ...


      Well, in general, if the Americans want to achieve parity in Yao with China, they really need to start with themselves and cut them unilaterally. China is lagging behind the US in intercontinental missiles (which implies a retaliatory strike) that could reach US territory. So the United States can contract itself without any treaties, from which, by the way, they withdrew.
  19. 0
    26 July 2021 09: 16
    Of course, you can achieve it.
    Only our counter-proposals will not suit the Americans.
  20. +1
    26 July 2021 09: 21
    Amerzians still think that they are hegemons ..... that's it, the train left .. bastards.
  21. +2
    26 July 2021 09: 26
    I am determined to reduce the risk of nuclear war through effective arms control, limitation of nuclear (potentials - approx.) Russia and China, (...)
    This won't work anymore. By the way, I forgot to mention North Korea.
  22. 0
    26 July 2021 09: 48
    can be shortened, but on a reciprocal basis :)
    the usa must also do this, otherwise there is no point in such negotiations, which our people have talked about more than once :)
    1. 0
      26 July 2021 12: 35
      Quote: Shkworen
      can be shortened, but on a reciprocal basis :)
      the usa must also do this, otherwise there is no point in such negotiations, which our people have talked about more than once :)

      It is impossible to reduce in any case, even on a mutual basis.
      NATO's superiority in conventional weapons is overwhelming. In such a situation, it is just right for us to build up nuclear weapons, not to reduce them.
  23. +1
    26 July 2021 10: 03
    The world has changed, and they are trying to steer in their parallel reality.
  24. The comment was deleted.
  25. 0
    26 July 2021 12: 32
    And she didn’t accidentally say how she was going to achieve this control? No. Populism in the current US administration is at a high level.
  26. 0
    26 July 2021 12: 57
    Jenkins did not explain in what ways the new US Undersecretary of State intends to seek nuclear reductions from Moscow and Beijing. but promised provide new strategic stability initiatives in the near future.

    The usual chatter is not worthy of attention, if only because she does not even know the reaction of Russia and China to these wishes of the Americans.
  27. 0
    26 July 2021 13: 30
    Our Jen got nervous.
    This madama will help her.
  28. 0
    26 July 2021 14: 57
    yes, but somehow they forgot themselves ...
  29. +1
    26 July 2021 15: 24
    Russia demanded that NATO countries disarm by summing up their entire joint arsenal. If all NATO member states are America's slaves, then they have common arsenals and America commands them!
  30. 0
    26 July 2021 15: 43
    Without taking into account the total nuclear weapons of the NATO countries and the return of nuclear weapons to the national borders of their owners, it makes no sense to discuss this.
  31. 0
    26 July 2021 15: 46
    It is possible, but after the division of the United States into 15 republics ...
  32. 0
    26 July 2021 21: 21
    "The United States announced its intention to" seek "from Moscow and Beijing to reduce nuclear arsenals" - some strange wishes from the United States. Do they think every year that a different leg wants, while others will always adapt to their requirements? This is unlikely. They build up their offensive forces without looking back at others, and all the rest should reduce counter-force weapons (doomsday)? It is strange, very strange. By the way, what about the disposal of chemical ammunition? then on their own initiative it is not needed, the same song about the INF Treaty. But the nuclear shield of the Russian Federation, you see, worries them. Well done, there is nothing to say, as always America first of all. Where does their consciousness work? No, everyone puts into service what he is strong in. They wipe their feet about the treaty, well, then the Russian Federation does not need anything almond. now the problem is of the one who threw caviar and tore contracts, and on the part of those who did not always fulfill the old instructions in the contracts.
  33. +1
    26 July 2021 21: 50
    Hegemonism for the whole head ...
  34. 0
    27 July 2021 11: 07
    Reducing the risk of nuclear war lies in the fact that Russia can now completely destroy the United States, and China will be able to do this in 5 years.
    The risk of nuclear war is entirely created by the United States. If the United States had not existed, there would have been no risk of a nuclear war.
  35. 0
    27 July 2021 11: 35
    The Gore-Chernomyrdin deal on the supply of enriched weapons-grade plutonium extracted from nuclear weapons for American nuclear power plants has ended, and the nuclear power plant needs to work on something. First to enrich - the costs are large - for weapons, and then to impoverish - also rather big costs - for nuclear power plants. "The ultimate goal is nothing, movement is everything" (c).
  36. 0
    27 July 2021 16: 13
    And how much have they cut themselves? greyhounds what!