There is such a profession - to defend the Motherland

89

The black-and-white film "Officers", the official premiere of which took place on July 26, 1971, has become one of the best domestic films of a patriotic orientation. The film, filmed at the M. Gorky film studio by director Vladimir Rogov, gathered more than 53 million viewers in the Soviet box office. Vasily Lanovoy, Georgy Yumatov and Alina Pokrovskaya, who played the main roles, have forever fallen in love with the domestic audience.

Brave and noble officers, who were very successfully implemented by Lanovoy and Yumatov, have become a real life guide for several generations of citizens of our country for many years. Alina Pokrovskaya also played an excellent role, in which many of the officers' wives recognized themselves.



In addition to the excellent acting, the film was remembered by many viewers for the phrase: "There is such a profession - to defend the Motherland." The phrase uttered at the very beginning of the film runs as a refrain throughout the whole picture. Despite the simplicity of the statement, she found a lively response in the hearts of the audience. In the very first year after the screening of the film, tens of thousands of young men expressed their desire to enter the military schools of the USSR. The number of applications submitted to military schools has grown exponentially.

The script of the film "Officers" is based on the play by Boris Vasiliev


The script of the film, which attracted 53,4 million viewers at the box office and, according to this indicator, became one of the most successful films of the Central Film Studio for Children and Youth Films named after Maxim Gorky, was based on the play "Tankers" by front-line writer Boris Vasiliev. The play was the literary debut of the famous Soviet writer, who left behind a rich literary heritage, including the stories “The Dawns Here Are Quiet…” and “Tomorrow Was the War”, the novel “Not on the Lists” and many other works.


Writer Boris Vasiliev

Initially, the film was supposed to be called "Tankers". However, the name was eventually changed. Based on this play, entitled "Officers", which eventually received a feature film, a play was prepared at the Theater of the Soviet Army, but after two trial performances since December 1955, it was no longer staged.

The original script for the film involved two episodes. While working on the script, Vasiliev included the events of the "Great Terror" with arrest and prison terms for the main characters who would have been released after the start of the war. However, the Minister of Defense did not like this option. Marshal Grechko demanded that the film studio reduce the script to one episode. Boris Vasiliev himself refused to shorten the script, so Kirill Rapoport was invited to complete it.

The author of the idea of ​​filming the film was Marshal Andrey Antonovich Grechko


The direct author of the idea of ​​shooting the film was the Minister of Defense of the Soviet Union, Marshal Andrei Antonovich Grechko. It is believed that the marshal himself became the author of the famous phrase: “There is such a profession - to defend the Motherland”.

Having such an initiator of the filming process behind his back, one could be sure that the film crew would be provided with all the necessary support. Indeed, the film was shot all over the USSR: in Moscow and the Moscow region, in Kalinin, Sevastopol and Ashgabat.

There is such a profession - to defend the Motherland
Marshal Andrey Antonovich Grechko, 1960

It was important for the marshal that the film would reveal the difficult life of the officer's wife, around which the plot with the main characters would develop. The film was originally commissioned as a work about the hard life of officers' wives. This task was successfully implemented on the screen by director Vladimir Rogovoy, for whom the film was the first where he was the chief director.

The cast of the film "Officers" gathered by chance


The cast of the film "Officers", which is so loved by several generations of viewers, gathered in such a composition by chance.

For a long time, completely different actors applied for the main roles. And Georgy Yumatov already had an ambiguous reputation at the time of filming, so it was difficult to approve him for the main role. The actor with great talent loved to drink and could disrupt the shooting.

Boris Vasiliev personally insisted on Yumatov's approval for the role, who had long been friends with Georgy Yumatov, knew him and believed in his talent. For the film, it was also of great importance that Yumatov was a front-line soldier. Ultimately, director Vladimir Rogovoy approved Yumatov for the role of Alexei Trofimov, giving him preference out of 42 candidates. In this choice Vasiliev and Rogovoy did not lose, Georgy Yumatov played in the film "Officers" one of his main roles in his career.

The role of Alexei Trofimov's friend and comrade Ivan Varavva was originally supposed to be played by actor Oleg Efremov. His candidacy for the role had already been approved, but the popular and sought-after artist could not free himself for filming in "Officers", as he was already engaged in another film.


Georgy Yumatov and Vasily Lanovoy in the film "Officers"

Only after that Vasily Lanovoy was again called for the role of the main character. Again, because several times before the actor had already abandoned the role of Ivan Varrava.

Lanovoy did not believe in a hero who could be unrequitedly in love with his friend's wife all his life. Vasily Lanovoy was invited to audition for the film "Officers" three times and, fortunately for everyone, persuaded to play this role.

Vasily Lanovoy will play a role in this film for the rest of his life. For an actor, both the film and the hero played have acquired a special become. Men, women and children of different ages perceived the film "Officers" in a special way, and Lanovoy saw this, was proud of his work and the work of the entire film team, emphasizing the importance of this role for himself.

The role of Alexei Trofimov's wife Lyubov Trofimova, with whom both main characters fell in love according to the plot, were initially approved by the actress Elena Dobronravova. However, the actress had her own vision for character development. Dobronravova proposed to slightly change the plot of the picture. The actress wanted her heroine to leave her husband for Ivan Barabbas. But the creators of the picture could not agree to such a change in the plot. And after several scandals, director Vladimir Rogovoy decided to part with Elena Dobronravova.


Alina Pokrovskaya in the film "Officers"

Alina Pokrovskaya, who had previously auditioned for this role, was urgently called for the role of Lyubov Trofimova. In addition, Pokrovskaya liked the plot of the film very much.

The winning solitaire of the actors has finally taken shape. As Alina Pokrovskaya said later, after the premiere of "The Officers" she suddenly woke up famous. Unlike her colleagues on the set, Alina Pokrovskaya chose to devote her life to the theater. Therefore, in her filmography, the role in the film "Officers" remained the most stellar in her career.

The song "Eternal Flame" (From the Heroes of Bygone Times) has become truly popular


The picture ends with an expressive musical composition, which complements the video sequence with shots from the life of the main characters of the picture, mixed with real fragments of documentary newsreels of the Great Patriotic War. The song, familiar today to a huge number of people in the post-Soviet space on the first line "From the heroes of the past", is actually called "Eternal Flame".


Poster for the film "Officers", image: ruskino.ru

This military-patriotic song, without which today it is impossible to imagine May 9, was written on the verses of Yevgeny Agranovich, the author of the music is the composer Raphael Khozak.

The song was specially created for the film "Officers". The popularity of this composition is as great as that of the film itself. It was performed by a variety of performers. At the same time, the spectrum of performers of this song in Russia is huge: from Sergei Bezrukov to the rock group Kukryniksy. That only emphasizes the uniqueness, beauty and power of this piece of music.

A monument to the heroes of the film "Officers" has been erected in Moscow


In our country, heroes of popular films often find a second life in the form of monuments installed in various cities. The same happened with the heroes of the film "Officers", which also demonstrates the love of the common spectator for them. The monument to the heroes of the tape was erected in Moscow on the Frunzenskaya embankment on December 9, 2013.

Alexey Ignatov became the author of the sculptural composition. The monument, on which four heroes of the film are presented, reproduces one of the scenes of the picture - the meeting of two old comrades in arms after a long separation, the wife and grandson of one of them. Actors Vasily Lanovoy and Alina Pokrovskaya took part in the opening of the monument.


Monument to the heroes of the film "Officers" on the Frunzenskaya embankment

Not so long ago, another monument dedicated to the film was unveiled in the capital.

In September 2018, the sculptural composition "Officers" appeared in the Main Personnel Directorate of the Russian Ministry of Defense. There are fewer heroes here: the young cadet Alexei Trofimov (played by actor Georgy Yumatov) and the commander of the cavalry squadron Georgy Petrovich (played by actor Vladimir Druzhnikov). Behind the backs of the heroes, the author of the monument placed a famous quote:

"There is such a profession - to defend the Motherland!"


89 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +27
    26 July 2021 04: 06
    It's hard to count how many times I watched the movie. I will add a photo of the monument from the personnel department of the Ministry of Defense
    1. +13
      26 July 2021 06: 10
      Quote: Konnick
      It's hard to count how many times I watched the movie.

      In MBOKU there is (I still think) the tradition of showing a picture to the graduating battalion before each release as a kind of instruction to young lieutenants.
      1. +12
        26 July 2021 08: 55
        Quote: Hagen
        Quote: Konnick
        It's hard to count how many times I watched the movie.

        In MBOKU there is (I still think) the tradition of showing a picture to the graduating battalion before each release as a kind of instruction to young lieutenants.

        Great tradition!
        1. +5
          26 July 2021 08: 58
          Quote: Wend
          Great tradition!

          We watched with pleasure. And after the service, a nostalgic note for the first steps in army life was added to the pleasure of the picture itself.
          1. +4
            26 July 2021 11: 41
            For some reason, my site is junk, does not accept comments.

            There are things that do not age over the years, do not wear out, do not fade, but are fresh as on the day of creation and even become brighter and more significant. Why? Because it the present art is understandable and close hereby people. The same is the film "Officers".
            1. +6
              26 July 2021 12: 28
              Quote: Vladimir Mashkov
              There are things that do not age over the years, do not wear out, do not fade, but are fresh as on the day of creation and even become brighter and more significant.

              You can treat the censorship of cultural works of the Soviet period in different ways, but what went through the thorns of the artistic councils of those years, today really looks a cut above the current "free creativity".
              1. +3
                26 July 2021 19: 31
                Black and white movie frames
                They quietly broke my heart again ...
                I know this movie a long time ago.
                The first time I watched it as a child ...

                Then I was able to understand the words:
                True friendship, uniform honor;
                Homeland, a harsh war
                The word of the officer, the commander!

                And of course there was love:
                Parting, and meeting again ...
                And a bunch of wildflowers
                Lube - from the handsome Lanovoy ...

                Country life in nearly forty years
                Then they showed us from the screen,
                Leaving a trace in souls forever, -
                There was no deception in these shots.

                Much water has flowed under the bridge since then.
                I remember more and more with sadness:
                Flowers that have fallen into the dust of the roads, -
                Comparing them with a cold feeling ...

                *
                The incomprehensible is happening now -
                It was as if a feverish woman possessed us.
                We have pride for the Fatherland
                Turned inside out in souls ...
                Galina Sweetheart
    2. +3
      26 July 2021 07: 15
      There was such a profession - to defend the Soviet Motherland. For the power of the people.
      1. +10
        26 July 2021 07: 29
        It still exists, and the Motherland, and the profession to defend it. It has long been said: "The country is everything, and the sovereign is nothing." (C) soldier
        1. -16
          26 July 2021 07: 32
          Quote: Sea Cat
          It still exists, and the Motherland, and the profession to defend it. It has long been said: "The country is everything, and the sovereign is nothing." (C) soldier

          And how are you doing? Protected the people? Yachts Dilbar and Eclipse included in the fleet? lol
          1. +9
            26 July 2021 08: 14
            I’m doing well with success, I don’t salivate out of envy.
            And the people will defend themselves as soon as they run out of patience.
            And this has already happened in the history of our country.

            "Everything passes, and it will pass" (c) hi
            1. +8
              26 July 2021 09: 27
              Constantine, don't feed the trolls. They only go into such topics and comments with only one meaning - He must leave. They, like the staff, personified their homeland with GDP. In fact, pseudo communists are pouring water on the mill of the United States.
              1. +3
                26 July 2021 10: 00
                Hi Aleksey. hi Now I will know and ignore. I can even three times, like that anecdote. laughing
            2. -6
              26 July 2021 13: 46
              Quote: Sea Cat
              And the people will defend themselves as soon as they run out of patience.

              The people have already ended ... and you protect and defend everything.
          2. +2
            26 July 2021 08: 33
            He has in the fleet: Varyag, Svetlana and Mercury
          3. 0
            26 July 2021 10: 34
            Quote: Civil
            Quote: Sea Cat
            It still exists, and the Motherland, and the profession to defend it. It has long been said: "The country is everything, and the sovereign is nothing." (C) soldier

            And how are you doing? Protected the people? Yachts Dilbar and Eclipse included in the fleet? lol

            Such a goal is not worth it, to protect the people. The goal is to protect the state. And the fact that it is anti-people is not a problem of the army, but of the people.
            1. 0
              26 July 2021 13: 47
              Quote: freddyk
              Such a goal is not worth protecting the people.

              It's five! The army is separate, the state is separate, the people are separate. Well then, are you called the Army of Russia? Maybe you will immediately call the PSC so that it is clear which side you are on.
              1. +1
                26 July 2021 14: 28
                Quote: Civil
                Quote: freddyk
                Such a goal is not worth protecting the people.

                It's five! The army is separate, the state is separate, the people are separate. Well then, are you called the Army of Russia? Maybe you will immediately call the PSC so that it is clear which side you are on.

                No, you did not understand. Carefully ... The army serves the state. The President is, for a moment, the Supreme Commander-in-Chief. The army will follow his orders, not some mythical people.
                P. S Do you recall the execution of the Parliament?
                1. -1
                  26 July 2021 15: 28
                  Quote: freddyk
                  No, you did not understand. Carefully ... The army serves the state. The President is, for a moment, the Supreme Commander-in-Chief. The army will follow his orders, not some mythical people.
                  P. S Do you recall the execution of the Parliament?

                  Ah, well, I see. I agree.
            2. The comment was deleted.
            3. +2
              26 July 2021 16: 46
              Quote: freddyk
              Such a goal is not worth it, to protect the people. The goal is to protect the state. And the fact that it is anti-people is not a problem of the army, but of the people.


              I will clarify. Protection not of the state in principle, because the state, as a mechanism that ensures the life of society, cannot be absent, but the protection of a certain state system. In the same way, for example, in the course of a civil war, it is determined which version of the state system will be established.

              Those. the state as an instrument exists for the people, but not vice versa. Any other option is workable, but inherently wrong. When the people exist for the state, the state in such a situation is used as an instrument of the colonial rule of parasites, which can be both inside the state and outside it. Accordingly, the army, which in principle is inseparable from the people, bears direct responsibility in the event of defending the wrong state system.
              1. 0
                26 July 2021 20: 21
                Quote: A_Lex
                When the people exist for the state

                This is called fascism. When the people exist for the nation, it is Nazism.
                1. +1
                  26 July 2021 20: 23
                  Quote: burger
                  This is called fascism. When the people exist for the nation, it is Nazism.


                  I do not quite understand about Nazism. In this case, is not the people the equivalent of the concept of the nation?

                  And, you mean that other people are used for the good of a particular nation. Yes it is clear. Although it turns out that in this format, Nazism is equivalent to colonialism.
                2. 0
                  27 July 2021 20: 49
                  Once on the destroyed "Fontanka" I discussed with one person who positioned himself as a communist. They argued about hunger in the early 30s. In the heat of the argument, he said that millions died from hunger, so that the rest of the people would survive. So this is a Nazi saying. If he said that millions died for the survival of the USSR, that would be a fascist statement.
                  1. +1
                    27 July 2021 21: 25
                    Quote: burger
                    Once on the destroyed "Fontanka" I discussed with one person who positioned himself as a communist. They argued about hunger in the early 30s. In the heat of the argument, he said that millions died from hunger, so that the rest of the people would survive. So this is a Nazi saying. If he said that millions died for the survival of the USSR, that would be a fascist statement.


                    And then how should one say about the famine of the 30s, so as not to be known as either a Nazi or a fascist?
                    1. 0
                      28 July 2021 02: 35
                      Yes, whatever you like, the main thing is that they would not say that these millions of victims benefited the nation (people) or the state.
                      1. +1
                        28 July 2021 13: 21
                        Quote: burger
                        Yes, whatever you like, the main thing is that they would not say that these millions of victims benefited the nation (people) or the state.


                        So to speak. This was not their only purpose. And certainly not for some target group that has defined itself as such. I mean, this cannot be presented from a racist point of view, when some, like the elect among Protestants, are destined for a good life, while others, like things, exist for their benefit.

                        On the other hand, the benefits as such are undoubtedly present. It's like a charter in the army, which is written in the blood of past mistakes. But this charter was written not for the generals, but for everyone. Actually, what is useful for everyone is really useful. In this sense, many catastrophes of the past are useful if the experience gained from them helps to prevent future ones.
          4. +1
            26 July 2021 16: 10
            you confuse wet with white. those about whose yachts you write with aspiration have a different profession - to plunder their homeland. and they do not, by and large, have a homeland.
        2. +1
          27 July 2021 11: 33
          Quote: Sea Cat
          It still exists, and the Motherland, and the profession to defend it. It has long been said: "The country is everything, and the sovereign is nothing." (C) soldier

          Now I would say this: There is such a profession - to clean up the Motherland!
  2. +14
    26 July 2021 04: 08
    Great movie. Eternal. In which everything is wonderful, history, heroes, every frame, every line, even every note (the author remembered about the song for a reason). Many thanks to the filmmakers.
    1. +8
      26 July 2021 04: 13
      Quote: Van 16
      Great movie. Eternal. In which everything is wonderful, history, heroes, every frame, every line, even every note (the author remembered about the song for a reason). Many thanks to the filmmakers.

      In-In! For noneshniy film "Stalingrad", with the attack of almost a flaming company, monuments will not be erected! good
      1. +1
        26 July 2021 09: 16
        with the attack of almost a flaming company, monuments will not be erected! good
        well ... considering the boards to all sorts of Mannerheims, monuments to the Kolchaks (even in the 90s they refused rehabilitation), the Reds, the glorification of Vlasov and others ... In general - "I am tormented by vague doubts."
        1. +1
          26 July 2021 11: 17
          You don’t understand ... I’m not talking about liberals, but about people's love! Yes
          1. 0
            26 July 2021 11: 22
            mi pardon hi
    2. +5
      26 July 2021 09: 09
      Great movie. Eternal.
      And what do you want. Art, and real art is immortal.
    3. 0
      26 July 2021 10: 12
      Great movie. Eternal.
      - I'm not sure, I wonder what will happen in 50 years, when we are no longer there. hi
  3. +3
    26 July 2021 04: 08
    Excellent and interesting article! I remembered a lot of things and learned interesting things. Only cuts "gathered at the box office 53,4 million viewers," and twice. And so - good Yes
    1. +7
      26 July 2021 04: 58
      I'm afraid these statistics should be reviewed for a long time, taking into account his views not only in cinemas over the years. The number will be multiples. We only played it in a cadet 10 times)))
      1. +11
        26 July 2021 05: 01
        Considering that I had it on a cassette, then on a disk, and now in a smartphone - I think the figure is oooooooo underestimated! Yes
        1. 0
          26 July 2021 07: 39
          Babay Atasovich
          Today, 05: 01
          NEW

          +5
          Considering that I had it on a cassette, then on a disk, and now in a smartphone - I think the figure is oooooooo underestimated! yes
          good I suppose it is necessary to add to the statistics! wink
    2. +2
      26 July 2021 07: 56
      Quote: Babay Atasovich
      Only cuts

      The surname of the film hero V. Lanovoy also hurts the ear. It's strange somehow.
      The author of the article has a slight inaccuracy - Barrabas, then Barabbas
      1. +2
        26 July 2021 16: 55
        Quote: bober1982
        The surname of the film hero V. Lanovoy also hurts the ear. It's strange somehow.
        The author of the article has a slight inaccuracy - Barrabas, then Barabbas


        Barabbas is a biblical character, a criminal, released by Pontius Pilate on the occasion of the celebration of Easter by the Jewish people.

        The reasons for such popularity of Barabbas among the ancient Jewish community are not known for certain. It seems extremely illogical that the assumption that the common people in their many could ask for the release of an ordinary criminal, therefore version of Barabbas as a fighter for the freedom and independence of Ancient Judea, exists and is shared, for example, by the official Catholic Church. Thus, Pope Benedict XVI writes in his encyclical Spe Salvi that: "Jesus was not Spartacus, he was not involved in the struggle for political liberation, like Barabbas or Bar Kokhba."
        1. 0
          26 July 2021 17: 48
          I meant it.
  4. +7
    26 July 2021 04: 33
    the film is wonderful as well as the actors!
    1. +4
      26 July 2021 08: 49
      Moreover, the actors in the film play better every year and with new viewing. It is not ironic, it is worth watching, a new Russian film about the war.
      1. +3
        26 July 2021 09: 13
        worth seeing, a new Russian war film.
        "No really! Uvoltes, ss!" (c) Lieutenant Rzhevsky)))
      2. +2
        26 July 2021 11: 13
        Quote: parusnik
        worth seeing, a new Russian war film.

        I have already looked at Stalingrad and WOT at the T-34 ...
      3. +4
        26 July 2021 11: 24
        Quote: parusnik
        Moreover, the actors in the film play better every year and with new viewing. It is not ironic, it is worth watching, a new Russian film about the war.

        Each new domestic film makes the previous one a masterpiece. © sad
  5. +10
    26 July 2021 07: 18
    A wonderful film. One of those who shape the thinking and attitudes of generations. Low bow to all who have put their hand to the film.
    1. Cat
      +4
      26 July 2021 08: 25
      I totally agree. I know at least two people who, under the influence of this particular film, became professional soldiers. There is nothing to say about the military estate of the USSR - there he has always been cult.
  6. +6
    26 July 2021 07: 38
    And now, there are no soulful songs for war films, such that would bring tears
    1. +1
      26 July 2021 09: 03
      And now, there are no soulful songs for war films, such that would bring tears
      only re-sing the old Soviet. Moreover, in the film, where friendship with a traitor is put above the Motherland.
      1. +6
        26 July 2021 09: 06
        To re-sing, not to write your own, but to write your own, little things are not enough - talent. laughing
        1. +2
          26 July 2021 09: 12
          little things are missing - talent
          I would also add here worldview and class consciousness hi Even with talent, but not understanding and not feeling the era, you will not write something worthwhile.
    2. 0
      26 July 2021 10: 03
      "Take your time" in the "War thunder" video penetrates to the depths of the soul. Although it cannot be called military
    3. -1
      26 July 2021 12: 03
      Quote: parusnik
      And now, there are no soulful songs for war films, such that would bring tears

      "Cuckoo" in "Defense of Sevastopol", no?
      1. +4
        26 July 2021 12: 07
        The cuckoo, appeared on V. Tsoi's Black Album, when the Defense of Sevastopol was not even thought to be filmed. It was simply inserted into the film, and not written for the film. The difference, you know?
        1. +1
          26 July 2021 13: 13
          Quote: parusnik
          The difference, you know?

          Nevertheless - she went into the film. And went in successfully.

          Z. Y. I am so aware of Tsoi, I even went to their concert once
          1. +3
            26 July 2021 15: 13
            It was completely clear, for example, the ACCA film, all the songs in the film were already known, they were not written specifically for the film. My comment is that now, good songs, to tears, are not written to films, so that the people would remain like a song from the movie Officers or from the movie White Sun of the Desert. And lastly, we will not be measured against Tsoi, who and how many times was at his concerts. laughing I went in, almost 25 years later, but I didn't write for the film on purpose.
            1. -1
              26 July 2021 16: 32
              Quote: parusnik
              But I was not specially written for the film.

              And you remember many songs to military films - which being specially written for the film - come in?
              By and large, there are a dozen of them - another, no more .. Songs of 17 moments, Officers, Belorussky railway station - offhand and that's it ...

              And the films were shot by a lot of the military in the USSR, 10 pieces at least annually
              1. +3
                26 July 2021 16: 51
                Over the past 30 years, can you name at least one song that was written specially for a war film that would have gone to the people? Or okay, if not to the military?
                1. -1
                  26 July 2021 18: 21
                  Quote: parusnik
                  Over the past 30 years, can you name at least one song that was written specially for a war film that would have gone to the people? Or okay, if not to the military?

                  Times have changed, haven't they? And have they changed dramatically?
                  Gadgets ....
                  I had a collection of cassettes (60 pieces) - it was "Well, you give yourself a fig !!!". The words "Let me rewrite!" Were as follows .. The texts were copied in notebooks ..
                  And everyone already had CDs ... in armfuls ...
                  And now, any song is available, any ...

                  It's just that in the 70s the amount of available music was limited. Have been listening to the same song for years. We got used to it ...

                  Therefore, then there were the eternal hits - and now there are practically none ...
                  The fact that I'm right - confirms the "damned West". There, too, there are no masterpieces after the 60-70-80s. How cut off ...
                  There are hits - there are no masterpieces

                  So now it is pointless to wait for the people to sing the song they liked from the movie.
                  1. +2
                    26 July 2021 20: 11
                    Play ping pong, Sergei laughing
                    1. -1
                      26 July 2021 23: 31
                      we will remain with our opinions ... It would be possible to give a bunch of titles of war films of the USSR, which you will not remember at all, let alone the songs of them. So they are not ... But it will be anti-Soviet ...

                      It's just impossible to find a hit that in the Russian Federation would be listened to by at least 10 million people at the same time. And to find a film from the USSR that was watched by 10-20-30 million in the first year is easy

                      and a little more about the tastes of the population ...
                      The film "Disco Dancer" is a masterpiece of all times and peoples ??? straight masterpiece ?? straight real?
                      "" Disco Dancer "was first shown in the USSR in 1983 in the information program of the XIII Moscow International Film Festival [2], after which an agreement was concluded on the purchase of the film, and the film was released in wide distribution in June 1984, immediately gaining immense popularity - his looked 60,9 млн viewers "
                      And next to it, for example PRESENT masterpiece - "The Cranes Are Flying"
                      "The film was watched in cinemas of the USSR 28,3 million viewers (10th place at the box office 1957) "
      2. -1
        26 July 2021 18: 43
        She was simply inserted into the film
        (c) parusnic
        And even quail a la Vitas
  7. +2
    26 July 2021 07: 45
    The film is great.
    I consider it unnecessary to mention Bezrukov.
  8. +2
    26 July 2021 08: 29
    After the first viewing: "Officers" I fantasized a lot: how to arrange Varava's life?
    1. -5
      26 July 2021 09: 57
      Quote: Astra wild2
      I fantasized a lot

      Fantasy, that is, the tendency to dream, is not such a harmless occupation.
      The realm of fantasy is the realm of demons.
      1. +1
        26 July 2021 10: 02
        Quote: bober1982
        The realm of fantasy is the realm of demons.

        You would be with your demons, it would be better for you to go to comment, there the audience is suitable. Can we already introduce the Inquisition? Thoughtcrime, do you want to introduce such a term into the Criminal Code?
        1. -2
          26 July 2021 10: 08
          Quote: aleksejkabanets
          You would be with your demons, you better go to comment

          I went where you are sending me.
          1. +2
            26 July 2021 10: 41
            Quote: bober1982
            I went where you are sending me.

            I have nothing to do there, your like-minded people graze there. So what about the Inquisition? Propose a draft law of this kind in the Duma? And then all the troubles are from disbelief, demons overcome.))))
        2. +1
          26 July 2021 12: 55
          I think, judging by the observations, there is already such an approach
      2. +3
        26 July 2021 11: 26
        Quote: bober1982
        Fantasy, that is, the tendency to dream, is not such a harmless occupation.
        The realm of fantasy is the realm of demons.

        Inquisitor Eisenhorn, re-login. smile
        1. -5
          26 July 2021 12: 12
          According to the Holy Fathers, fantasies are a stupid presentation of random images and a disorderly wandering of the mind, which is generated by idleness and passions.
          1. +2
            26 July 2021 17: 08
            Quote: bober1982
            fantasies - stupid presentation of random images and random wandering of the mind


            Well, if so, then maybe. And if, for example, take a book like Solaris? After all, this is also the result of pure fantasy. But the truth is, all this fantasy is extremely purposeful, the result of which is a fairly logical and consistent behavior of the characters. Those. when is fantasy something bad? When is she aimless, messy?
            1. +1
              26 July 2021 17: 49
              Quote: A_Lex
              Those. when is fantasy something bad? When is she aimless, messy?

              The main thing is that the "Holy Fathers" are removed from the solution of such issues the further, the better.
  9. +5
    26 July 2021 09: 29
    The film looks in one breath and every time you discover something new, thanks to all the creators.
  10. +3
    26 July 2021 10: 00
    Until now, the lyrics and music of the song evoke strong feelings.
    And I watched the film countless times.
  11. +5
    26 July 2021 10: 20
    Film, actors, music, simply divine! Yes, now they are not filming, which is a pity.
    After the film "Stalingrad" I wanted to spit and swear, given that the book "In the trenches of Stalingrad" by Viktor Nekrasov had been read to the core.
  12. The comment was deleted.
  13. +5
    26 July 2021 13: 55
    I remember the grand opening of the memorial (T-34 tank) in Sovetsk (formerly Tilsit) at the end of the 60s. Marshal Andrey Antonovich Grechko made a speech. Then my father, a disabled war veteran, a blind man (he was the Chairman of the Society of the Blind in Sovetsk) asked me to go with him, to see him out ... And I also did not go to school ... I saw Dad crying ... This is upbringing! The film was created to develop a sense of responsibility of the young generation towards their older relatives, towards real Heroes! The 90s are all simple ...
  14. +3
    26 July 2021 14: 27
    What is the moment on the train, when the mother sees the photo of the deceased son. Every time my heart begins to tremble and tears well up when I see this episode! We knew how to shoot
  15. +2
    26 July 2021 15: 22
    Now I will probably voice a mega-unpopular opinion. But in general ... is the film in question propaganda? In fact, yes, it is. But at the same time, hatred of other peoples or denial of human rights and freedoms is NOT promoted there.
    Whether the film under discussion is a classic of the Soviet and world cinema, too, of course "yes". No doubt about it.

    Therefore, in honor of the fiftieth anniversary of the film.
    Director V.A. Rogovy (1923-1983); scriptwriters K.I. Rapoport (1926-1983), B.L. Vasiliev (1924-2013) - eternal memory!
    All the rest of the people involved in the creation of this motion picture - living long years and eternal memory to those who have already passed away!
    1. 0
      26 July 2021 16: 52
      One of the scriptwriters of the film, when the wind of change blew, said literally the following - ... Stalin was a durak, worse than Hitler.
      Hence the moral - do not make yourself idols and idols
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. +1
      26 July 2021 17: 18
      Quote: Terran Ghost
      But in general ... is the film in question propaganda? In fact, yes, it is.


      If the right values ​​are promoted, that is good propaganda.

      If the wrong values ​​are promoted, that is bad propaganda.

      Correct values ​​are about the fact that the public is higher than the individual. For example, that you need to be vaccinated or wear a mask so that others do not infect and do not get sick yourself and add problems to society.

      Wrong values ​​are the primacy of human rights and freedoms. Unlimited rights and freedoms for anything. For example, when it is stated that "I will not be vaccinated or wear a mask, because I do not want this, and I do not care about everyone else, because my desire is above everything else."

      As a rule, moral urges stand up for rights and freedoms, because it is extremely important for them to get a legal opportunity to do what an ordinary, normal person would not even think of.
      1. 0
        26 July 2021 18: 00
        Well said, I completely agree, that's why the film Officers is a good film, as, for example, the film Only old people go to battle, you need to know how to make sensible propaganda films.
      2. -1
        26 July 2021 18: 31
        A. Familiar genre. Denial of fundamental human rights and freedoms. Others' rights and freedoms, not their own, as it always happens.
        With a very clumsy demagogic "justification". Moreover, it is also a thoroughly deceitful and crafty "justification" by itself. Why crafty? Yes, because in the case of vaccination, just the same, its need is due to the fact that other people, here SUDDENLY, have a completely legal right not to be exposed to unnecessary risk of contracting dangerous infectious diseases. And yes, the need to respect these rights of an indefinitely large number of people is indeed sufficient justification to neglect someone's reluctance to be vaccinated.
        Correct values ​​are about the fact that the public is higher than the individual.

        Society is made up of individuals. Each of which has its own interests, tastes, desires and dreams. And each of whom has the right to life, freedom and the pursuit of happiness.
        Therefore, the question can and should be raised only about the balance of private (private-property) interest (that is, meeting the personal needs of one person or a family group of people, regardless of the interests of all other residents of the same society) and public interest (that is, those benefits that are used on the collective based on all members of society or all of humanity as a whole).
        because it is extremely important for them to get a legal opportunity to do what an ordinary, normal person would not even think of

        I have already mentioned that it is necessary to take into account equally the rights and freedoms of all people living in society. But - we are talking about rights and freedoms. In no case is it about a variety of inflated "feelings", only waiting for the right moment to "be offended".
        If another person, say, wears a piercing in his nose, or loves a genre of music that is not liked by other people, or professes a religion different from the majority (or is an atheist and does not hide his beliefs), none of the above is a reason for restricting his rights and freedoms ( including the freedom to do the above), and even more so it is NOT and CANNOT be a reason for violent actions in his direction.
        1. +1
          26 July 2021 19: 02
          Quote: Terran Ghost
          A. Familiar genre. Denial of fundamental human rights and freedoms. Others' rights and freedoms, not their own, as it always happens.


          Not true. Fundamental rights and freedoms such as the right to life, to work, etc. were not denied. Likewise, there was no emphasis on denying only the rights of others. This is just the favorite topic of egoists, who, by human rights and freedoms, implicitly mean the possibility for themselves loved ones to do anything at the expense of others.

          It was written clearly - the public is always above the personal. What, by the way, is the entire film Officers discussed here, where the main characters only do that they constantly sacrifice something personal, in the name of the common.

          Quote: Terran Ghost
          Society is made up of individuals. Each of which has its own interests, tastes, desires and dreams. And each of whom has the right to life, freedom and the pursuit of happiness.


          Society is made up of different people who have the same real needs. The need for food, shelter, clothing, etc. And all these identical needs of each person can be satisfied in a more or less the same way according to the principle of necessary and sufficient, which, of course, is based on clear scientific data.

          So, if a one-room apartment with a dimension of 45-50 squares is enough for a person for a comfortable life, then the claims of individual dreamy organisms that see personal happiness exclusively in their own island with a 5-storey cottage are not taken into account. Because if someone lives in a palace, then someone else will certainly be forced to live in a hut, since few guardians for personal chic happiness, for the sake of ensuring it, accumulate in their hands the lion's share of the resources of the whole society, as a result of which it turns out that many are banal to enough resources for a normal life.

          Quote: Terran Ghost
          If another person, say, wears a piercing in his nose, or loves a genre of music that is not liked by other people, or professes a religion different from the majority (or is an atheist and does not hide his beliefs), none of the above is a reason for restricting his rights and freedoms ( including the freedom to do the above), and even more so it is NOT and CANNOT be a reason for violent actions in his direction.


          Formal differences between one person and another are not significant as long as a person's behavior in society corresponds to the correct values. So, if, for example, a person promotes a religion in which different people are divided into varieties, from which, in turn, different opportunities for different people follow, up to prohibitions for some and privileges for others, this, of course, should be suppressed, since any inadequate assumptions (and the same racism is a fiction that has no real justification) that do not correspond to reality should not have an impact on society, no matter what sauce they are promoting.
  16. 0
    26 July 2021 18: 48
    Today, 26.7.2021/XNUMX/XNUMX, on the OTR channel in the "Calendar" program, they talked about the film, the actors ...
  17. 0
    26 July 2021 21: 51
    Alas. The reverse phrase is in vogue now. " .......sell"
    50 years have passed, but how everything has changed.
    It is literally the next generation, and he keeps some of his membership cards at home just in case, and takes billions abroad ...
  18. 0
    28 July 2021 15: 36
    Jde vskutku o nádherný film. Ve svém mládí, ale i později jsem film viděl 6 xa stále se mi líbí. Píši jako cizinec, ale jen dle území kde žiji (Čechy), jinak jako bývalý důstojník to jsou stále moji hrdinové.