Erdogan's "steel sword": test result of new anti-ship missile Atmaca shown in Turkey

83

Turkish long-range anti-ship missile Atmaca Friday has passed final tests. The video from the tests, which we present below, was published by the President of the country, Recep Tayyip Erdogan. Atmaca struck a ship for the first time

The Atmaca anti-ship missile, the steel sword of our homeland, hits a target ship today for the first time

- wrote Erdogan on Twitter.



The ship suffered massive damage (a large hole formed in the hull). The anti-ship missile was launched from the TCG Kınalıada corvette. The historic test, which was held in the Black Sea province of Sinop, was attended by Turkish Defense Minister Hulusi Akar and the country's high military command.

The Atmaca missile can be called one of the most ambitious modern attempts to create weapons of its own production by Turkey. The country is building up its technological potential and is going to continue to pursue the course of reducing its dependence on arms imports. In particular, with the help of the new missile, it is planned to cover part of the needs of the country's navy in anti-ship missiles.

The Atmaca is a high-precision long-range anti-ship strike missile that can be used by corvettes, frigates and even patrol boats. In the future, it will be able to replace the American-made Harpoon anti-ship missiles, which are now in service with the Turkish fleet.

The range of the Atmaca missile is more than 200 kilometers, which poses a threat to targets far out of sight. During the tests, the Turkish command made sure of the missile's ability to cover a distance of up to 250 kilometers, update targets, re-attack them, and also interrupt the mission through a modern data transmission channel.

Advanced XNUMXD route planning allows you to perform a wide variety of actions, including avoiding or flying over islands.


The development of the rocket began back in 2009, but it wasn't until 2018 that a mass production agreement was signed between Defense Industries (SSB) and Roketsan. In September, SSB chief Ismail Demir said that Atmaca should go into series production soon. The rocket has passed over 20 tests.

The Turkish military command intends to equip National Ship (MILGEM) corvettes, as well as other ships and submarines currently using Harpoon missiles, with Atmaca missiles.

Roketsan chief Murat Ikinci said the Atmaca missiles are a testament to Turkey's ability to manufacture and use its own anti-ship missiles. By the end of 2021, it is planned to equip the first ships of the Turkish Navy with missiles.

The test result is shown:

83 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    21 June 2021 09: 45
    The Turks showed the result.
    I wonder if we will ever see the result of the Zircon shooting?
    1. +1
      21 June 2021 09: 48
      Here only the words of Suvorov about Napoleon need to be remembered: "He walks wide, boy! It's time to calm down!"
    2. +16
      21 June 2021 09: 52
      There is nothing secret about the Turkish rocket

      Another model of a small subsonic anti-ship missile system, the same Harpoon
      1. +15
        21 June 2021 10: 20
        Quote: Santa Fe
        There is nothing secret about the Turkish rocket

        In general, you are right. The main thing about her is that she is TURKISH. The competence of the Turkish defense industry is growing.
        1. Cat
          0
          21 June 2021 10: 26
          she is TURKISH

          And whose electronics is in it? I strongly doubt that it is Turkish.
          1. +2
            21 June 2021 10: 39
            There is nothing secret about the Turkish rocket

            Another model of a small subsonic anti-ship missile system


            The caliber is also another model of the subsonic CR.
            It's just that someone can create and have them in service, but someone cannot.

            And so:
            - "nothing secret", the barmaley managed to think when they met a rocket arriving from the Caspian Sea.

            Turkish "nothing secret, the next model of a small-sized subsonic anti-ship missile system, the same Harpoon" will also be sent to Russian ships in the Black Sea.

            A completely unclassified bullet hit our ambassador to Turkey.
            And there is no secret in this either.
            1. 0
              21 June 2021 10: 56
              The caliber is also another model of the subsonic CR.

              Check out what Caliber does at the end of the trajectory)))
              1. +1
                21 June 2021 11: 22
                Quote: lucul
                Check out what Caliber does at the end of the trajectory)))

                Which one of? If the one that was allowed on the barmaley, then nothing.
                1. 0
                  21 June 2021 11: 28
                  Which one of?

                  Marine))
                  1. -1
                    21 June 2021 11: 33
                    Quote: lucul
                    Which one of?

                    Marine))

                    They are, suddenly, all marine.
                    1. -5
                      21 June 2021 11: 43
                      They are, suddenly, all marine.

                      That sho you say))))
                      See the anti-ship option - no Harpoon was lying around, however, like the Tomahawk Block 5))))
                      1. -1
                        21 June 2021 11: 59
                        Quote: lucul
                        That sho you say))))

                        Himself in shock.
                        Quote: lucul
                        See the anti-ship option - no Harpoon was lying around, however, like the Tomahawk Block 5))))

                        I repeat the question, WHICH of the anti-ship ones)))))
                        PS: How do such commentators cheer me up))) go around the bush, they can't say anything specifically, but they are trying to prove to everyone their downright expert status))) Yes? a person who has two types of Calibers: sea and not sea)))
                      2. -7
                        21 June 2021 13: 24
                        I repeat the question, WHICH of the anti-ship ones)))))

                        Three-stage 3M-54E)))
                        PS: How do such commentators cheer me up))) go around the bush, they can't say anything specifically, but they are trying to prove to everyone their downright expert status)))

                        Another Izzu has to dunk his nose.)))
                        How many of them have already been here))))
                        Yes? a person who has two types of Calibers: sea and not sea)))

                        The very presentation of the meaning is guaranteed by Izzy.
                      3. +1
                        21 June 2021 13: 51
                        Quote: lucul
                        Another Izzu has to dunk his nose.)))

                        There are no Calibers that start outside the ship.
                        All calibers are marine.

                        This was the solution to the problem of banning medium and short-range missiles. INF Treaty.

                        The start from Kasipia showed the “partners” that Russia had solved the problem.
                        Placement on RTOs is a solution to the same problem. For RTOs can send Caliber being not only in the Caspian Sea, but also on the Volga and on the Don and on any other navigable river of which there are enough in Russia.

                        All marine calibers.

                        And Caliber targets can be both at sea and on land.

                        And who did you "dunk"?
                      4. -3
                        21 June 2021 13: 54
                        All calibers are marine.

                        Another one to be smart - there are Calibers that shoot only at ground targets, and there are those that shoot only at sea targets.
                        Therefore, there is a gradation according to the goal - sea or land)))
                      5. -1
                        21 June 2021 14: 04
                        Quote: lucul
                        Another one climbs to be clever

                        Quote: lucul
                        Therefore, there is a gradation according to the goal - sea or land))

                        Did you get the bottom? For all normal people, the gradation is based on the type of basing))) and the types of targets hit are different)))
                      6. -4
                        21 June 2021 14: 09
                        Did you get the bottom? For all normal people, the gradation is based on the type of basing))) and the types of targets hit are different)))

                        Indeed.))))
                        Well, here's an introduction - an aircraft missile - sometimes air-to-air, and sometimes air-to-surface.
                        What information will be more complete for you to understand? When do I say just an aircraft missile - or when do I say an air-to-air or air-to-surface missile?
                      7. 0
                        21 June 2021 14: 20
                        Quote: lucul
                        Well, here's an introduction - an aircraft missile - sometimes air-to-air, and sometimes air-to-surface.

                        O could not go into specifics in capital letters))
                        Quote: lucul
                        What information will be more complete for you to understand? When do I say just an aircraft missile - or an air-to-air missile or an air-to-surface missile?

                        None, half a percent better than "sea"))
                        A person who is trying to show his "knowledge in technology", but at the same time, when asked about a specific example, instead of the name of the product or its designation, he operates with ADDITIONALS)))) sea, land and others .... "This is a fiasco bro"
                      8. -4
                        21 June 2021 14: 21
                        It's a fiasco bro "

                        This is really a fiasco)))
                        To the directly posed question - you went into adjectives))))
                      9. -1
                        21 June 2021 14: 23
                        Quote: lucul
                        To the question posed - you have gone into adjectives))))

                        We also don't know how to read)))
                        I will repeat the answer especially for you:
                        Quote: JD1979
                        None, half a percent better than "sea"))
                      10. -2
                        21 June 2021 14: 27
                        We also don't know how to read)))
                        I will repeat the answer especially for you:

                        Okay, so you have to lower your nose.
                        So
                        None, half a percent better than "sea"))

                        What does no mean? Couldn't master the question?
                      11. -1
                        21 June 2021 14: 55
                        Quote: lucul
                        What does no mean? Couldn't master the question?

                        No means, no, no other information is suitable for understanding.
                      12. -3
                        21 June 2021 15: 08
                        No means, no, no other information is suitable for understanding.

                        Clearly, I only perceive information that I have memorized at one time - a step to the left or to the right puts you into a stupor, right? ))))
                      13. 0
                        21 June 2021 14: 02
                        Quote: lucul
                        Three-stage 3M-54E)))

                        Congratulations, from 10 times we finally looked at a specific rocket))) and it's not a fact that it's not in my post above)))
                        Quote: lucul
                        Another Izzu has to dunk his nose.)))

                        You will first emerge from the dummy))) otherwise, judging by your next post, on the contrary, you are trying to dive deeper))
                      14. -2
                        21 June 2021 14: 11
                        Congratulations, from 10 times we finally looked at a specific rocket))) and it's not a fact that it's not in my post above)))

                        Should I write a sheet with an answer for each post, or is it easier to hint a person where to look for himself?
                        And there are narcissistic people who play with an opponent, like a cat and a mouse, squeezing information out of themselves drop by drop, with a meaningful look))))
                      15. -1
                        21 June 2021 14: 31
                        Quote: lucul
                        Should I write a sheet with an answer for each post, or is it easier to hint a person where to look for himself?

                        It is enough to indicate a specific model if we are talking about technology and not about literature or weather))
                        Quote: lucul
                        And there are narcissistic people who play with an opponent, like a cat and a mouse, squeezing information out of themselves drop by drop, with a meaningful look))))

                        I completely agree with you)) Drop by drop, one word at a time)))
                        Quote: lucul
                        Marine))

                        From what post did you meaningfully write the specific subject of your statement?)))
                        Quote: lucul
                        Three-stage 3M-54E)))

                        From the 4th?))
                        Only in your case, not a cat with a mouse))) but there was a convulsive search)
                      16. -1
                        21 June 2021 14: 37
                        It is enough to indicate a specific model if we are talking about technology and not about literature or weather))

                        It was about RCC Caliber, which is better than Harpoon in everything, but you must give everything, right down to the identification number, otherwise you will not perceive the information.
                        I completely agree with you)) Drop by drop, one word at a time)))

                        Well, I can see how you like to do it.
                        From what post did you meaningfully write the specific subject of your statement?)))

                        From the first post about Caliber.
                        From the 4th?))
                        Only in your case, not a cat with a mouse))) but there was a convulsive search)

                        I beg you, 2 years ago I argued here about Calibers and Tomahawks - a direct comparison.
                      17. -2
                        21 June 2021 14: 52
                        Quote: lucul
                        It was about RCC Caliber, which is better than Harpoon in everything, but you must give everything, right down to the identification number, otherwise you will not perceive the information.

                        I understand very well, especially if it is well written, but not in your case, not only do you write meaninglessly, but you also forget what you wrote on the campaign))
                        So let's refresh our memory:
                        Quote: lucul
                        The caliber is also another model of the subsonic CR.

                        Check out what Caliber does at the end of the trajectory)))

                        Where are we talking about anti-ship missiles? which of the 5 main types are we talking about? What is he doing? Moving to a super low profile? maneuvers? what?
                        There is nothing to write because you do not know but want to be smart?
                        Quote: lucul
                        Well, I can see how much you like it.

                        those
                        Quote: lucul
                        And there are narcissistic people who play with an opponent, like a cat and a mouse, squeezing information out of themselves drop by drop, with a meaningful look))))

                        You yourself have just admitted that what was written above applies to you ... as it is called, in the course of the investigation, they went out to themselves ...
                        Quote: lucul
                        From the first post about Caliber.

                        Lord, well, why lie))), it is still written)))
                        Quote: lucul
                        Three-stage 3M-54E)))

                        4th post or even up to 4 do not know how to count)
                        Quote: lucul
                        I beg you, 2 years ago I argued here about Calibers and Tomahawks - a direct comparison.

                        No need to belittle me, judging by what you wrote above, thank God that I didn’t come across THIS.

                        Well, that's all. Your level is clear, "enthusiasm is off scale" but everything else is not.
                      18. 0
                        21 June 2021 15: 04
                        Where are we talking about anti-ship missiles?

                        If you are a "specialist", you should have known that the Caliber version does not change its flight in the final section of the trajectory against a ground target - only the anti-ship version does this. Are you going to argue?
                        You yourself have just admitted that what was written above applies to you ... as it is called, in the course of the investigation, they went out to themselves ...

                        What is starting to dawn on you? )))
                        I did not squeeze out information drop by drop for narcissism, as you do, I give a hint of the essence right away.
                        Lord, well, why lie))), it is still written)))

                        Don't lie)))
                        You started to flirt.
                        Which one of? If the one that was allowed on the barmaley, then nothing.

                        It's about the RCC? Is not it so ? )
                        You also needed to show off, you so wanted to hear whether I would call 3M-54E or 3M-54E1. And then there's the missile identification number, right?
                        But those who are in the subject always understand half-heartedly, you also like to include misunderstandings and poking around is not known what.))))
                2. +6
                  21 June 2021 11: 31
                  Do not confuse anti-ship missiles with cruise missiles designed to strike at coastal targets. "Caliber" in the version of the anti-aircraft missile go to supersonic in the final phase of the flight and makes a sickly anti-aircraft maneuver.
                  1. -3
                    21 June 2021 11: 42
                    Quote: Artyom Karagodin
                    ... "Caliber" in the version of the anti-aircraft missile go to supersonic in the final phase of the flight and makes a sickly anti-aircraft maneuver.

                    Ага.
                    And this 8-meter shellezyak weighs 2300 kg, that is, 3 times more.
                    And how much more expensive, one can only guess.
                  2. -3
                    21 June 2021 12: 09
                    Quote: Artyom Karagodin
                    Do not confuse anti-ship missiles with cruise missiles designed to strike at coastal targets. "Caliber" in the version of the anti-aircraft missile go to supersonic in the final phase of the flight and makes a sickly anti-aircraft maneuver.


                    And tell us what "sickly anti-aircraft maneuver" can be made by an anti-aircraft missile flying at an ultra-low altitude?
                    Except for the "slide" - not a single maneuver is provided in the anti-ship missile systems.

                    And if its "slide" is also done during the speed of the terminal? Are you aware of what you are writing?
                    You have added two mutually exclusive factors ...
                    Picked up from different missiles - different characteristics and weaved into one. We crossed a snake and a hedgehog.
                    And we got a meter of barbed wire.
                    Here is your result.
                    1. -2
                      21 June 2021 12: 24
                      Quote: SovAr238A
                      And tell us what "sickly anti-aircraft maneuver" can be made by an anti-aircraft missile flying at an ultra-low altitude?
                      Except for the "slide" - not a single maneuver is provided in the anti-ship missile systems.

                      So it is provided))
                      Quote: SovAr238A
                      And if its "slide" is also done during the speed of the terminal? Are you aware of what you are writing?

                      or not provided?)))
                      Quote: SovAr238A
                      Picked up from different missiles - different characteristics and weaved into one. We crossed a snake and a hedgehog.
                      And we got a meter of barbed wire.
                      Here is your result.

                      You will decide, otherwise you have picked up different things and cannot add together)
                      1. +1
                        21 June 2021 12: 43
                        Quote: JD1979

                        You will decide, otherwise you have picked up different things and cannot add together)


                        Well, you probably don't understand, we'll be on our toes.
                        About the "Gorka" and the rocket.
                        The slide is made by a low-flying subsonic rocket.
                        The "Gorka" anti-missile maneuver is not, since the climb is an unmasking factor and increases the chances of being hit by air defense means of ships.
                        A slide is a maneuver, by changing the angle of encounter with a target, allowing the missile to have a greater lethal effect.


                        About "Acceleration".
                        The acceleration of a low-flying anti-ship missile is carried out after a stable lock on the target, turning on the target, determining the point of advance of the strike - and simply accelerates to a speed of 2M. Thus, reducing the time spent in the air defense zone of ships. And by increasing the kinetic energy of the impact.
                        A kind of blow with a stiletto.

                        These are two different and opposite tactics and systems.
                        Combining them is impossible.
                        The rocket cannot, gaining speed up to 2M, also make a slide.
                      2. -1
                        21 June 2021 13: 24
                        Another expert ... Well, there are so many of you today ...))
                        About the slide.
                        1. The slide maneuver is performed primarily to hit "low-sitting targets" for which, in the case of using the usual profile, there is a high probability of a miss, especially in the case of waves.
                        2. Exit to the hill and large angles of attack allows you to enter the funnel of a part of anti-aircraft weapons

                        About acceleration
                        1.it either exists in the case of multistage missiles with a supersonic combat stage
                        2.or it is absent in the case of classic supersonic missiles of a normal aerodynamic design, since it already goes at a maximum speed of Mach 2 - 3, and in the case of an anti-ship missile without a supersonic stage (3M-54E1) and a classic layout (Kh-35)
                        And acceleration is also essentially a maneuver and a means of reducing the effectiveness of air defense))

                        Quote: SovAr238A
                        These are two different and opposite tactics and systems.

                        Yeah, like a brick, it can be warm but not soft))

                        Quote: SovAr238A
                        The rocket cannot, gaining speed up to 2M, also make a slide.

                        Did you personally write profiles? or so fancy?

                        I understand that the anti-aircraft maneuvers of the PRK, which the ancient P-6 could still perform, passed you by. The same "snake"))) and I do it all the rockets at any speed. The fact that they do not write about this in the yellow press - so and who is interested in such subtleties, expressions such as "there are no analogues" are more appreciated there))).
                    2. -1
                      21 June 2021 13: 51
                      And tell us what "sickly anti-aircraft maneuver" can be made by an anti-aircraft missile flying at an ultra-low altitude?

                      The maneuver is possible both in the vertical plane and in the horizontal plane)))
                      This is because, if the SAM itself, if it has the ability to maneuver with overloads (in the horizontal plane) exceeding the developed overloads of the intercepted missile, it greatly loses in flight range from the maneuver and its energy may no longer be enough to intercept the anti-ship missile.
                  3. -1
                    21 June 2021 12: 09
                    Quote: Artyom Karagodin
                    Do not confuse anti-ship missiles with cruise missiles

                    Um .... You yourself are confusing the RCC (purpose) with the CD (construction type)))).
                    Onyx - anti-ship missile, "classical", supersonic.
                    Caliber 3M-54E - anti-ship missiles, "winged" 3-stage, 3-stage supersonic.
                    Caliber 3M-54E1 - anti-ship missiles, "winged" 2-stage, subsonic.
                    1. +2
                      21 June 2021 12: 23
                      Quote: JD1979
                      Caliber 3M-54E - anti-ship missiles, "winged" 3-stage, 3-stage supersonic.
                      Caliber 3M-54E1 - anti-ship missiles, "winged" 2-stage, subsonic.

                      Ага.
                      And the anti-aircraft maneuver is done by 3M-54E1,
                      and the 3M-54E slide. What are very different things.
                      1. 0
                        21 June 2021 12: 47
                        Quote: Jacket in stock
                        Ага.
                        And the anti-aircraft maneuver is done by 3M-54E1,
                        and the 3M-54E slide. What are very different things.

                        Moreover, the maneuvers when the post is about the design))) at least look to whom and what I wrote))
              2. -1
                21 June 2021 19: 09
                Can he re-attack the target?
          2. 0
            21 June 2021 13: 29
            One retired Turkish astsubay (warrant officer) told me that all the electronic stuffing of the first Bayraktars who entered the army was of Ukrainian origin. It is possible that such scientific and technical cooperation continues.
        2. +2
          21 June 2021 10: 32
          It looks like an "exoskeet". Both the container and the rocket. I think they were guided by it ...
      2. +6
        21 June 2021 10: 39
        The engine is French, the rest of the "filling" is also imported. What is Turkish in it? Body and final assembly. Palestinians in the Gaza Strip also rivet rockets)))
    3. -5
      21 June 2021 11: 42
      Once tested at 400, then the engine and control system are in working order. Will finish up to 1000 km, a matter of time.
  2. +6
    21 June 2021 09: 47
    Almost 70 years in NATO technologies, consultations, accessories. Studying in prestigious universities and higher educational institutions of the West
    Plus the political will of the country's leadership
    1. +3
      21 June 2021 09: 51
      Quote: knn54
      Almost 70 years in NATO technology ...

      Almost 500 years of the Ottoman Empire.
      The territory of which is more than the EU.

      And only the 20th century is addiction.
      Even at this time, the largest army among the European members of NATO.

      Currently, the restoration of the former country.
      You tend to underestimate Turkey.

      Turkey is not Ukraine or even Germany.
      Turkey is the only NATO country that pursues an independent foreign policy.
      All the rest cannot even fart without US sanction.
      1. -5
        21 June 2021 10: 58
        Turkey is the only NATO country that pursues an independent foreign policy.

        How long ago? If Putin hadn't saved Erdogan, there would have been another 200 years of the Anglasaxons' occupation of Turkey, or even more)))
        1. +3
          21 June 2021 11: 44
          Quote: lucul
          Don't save Putin Erdogan

          So after all, he saved.
          And in response, "Crimea is not yours, but ours."
  3. 0
    21 June 2021 09: 51
    Even some non-serious high-explosive action of the warhead, the ship is an ancient rusty laiba. I like it when the enemy ship is annihilated, that is, it evaporates. I hope our anti-ship missiles are more powerful in terms of impact.
    1. +7
      21 June 2021 09: 59
      ship ancient rusty laiba

      This is always done when testing anti-ship missiles

      For more effect
      I like it when the enemy's ship is canceled, that is, it evaporates

      Such an anti-ship missile will have to be launched from the baikonur
      I hope our anti-ship missiles are more powerful in terms of impact.

      The supersonic Onyx has no room for a large warhead (300 kg with the shell)

      The supersonic version of the Caliber with a detachable combat stage (anti-ship 3M-54) has an even smaller warhead

      Small-sized X-35 is the same analogue of the Harpoon (and this will remind you of 500 pounds = 220 kg with something)
      1. -3
        21 June 2021 10: 02
        And what, you can't use a tactical warhead on anti-ship missiles. Is there an agreement to limit the use of tactical ammunition?
        1. 0
          21 June 2021 10: 08
          A tactical nuclear warhead?
          Launching such a rocket would bring the world to the brink. It's worth it?

          Conventional ammunition has no such restrictions on its use. They also prefer to be cut
          1. +3
            21 June 2021 10: 43
            And who knows what we have on the anti-ship missile system? And why the sea of ​​tactical ammunition was created! That they know how many, only approximately, and in my opinion they are not included in any conventions. Well, our defensive doctrine has changed, we will respond to an ordinary strike that threatens the country's existence. with all the means at our disposal. All the key word.
        2. +4
          21 June 2021 10: 28
          Quote: tralflot1832
          And what, you can't use a tactical warhead on anti-ship missiles. Is there an agreement to limit the use of tactical ammunition?

          Can.
          Only
          1-Turkey is a type of non-nuclear country (or rather, there are none of its own, only American ones).
          2- Tests how to carry out? nuclear explosions are now such as banned.

          And so the Turkish missile has a warhead weight of 220 kg, our X35 has 135 kg. Electronics, panimaash.
          1. +1
            21 June 2021 10: 48
            For a good "target" in battle, nothing should be a pity.
            1. +1
              21 June 2021 10: 56
              Quote: tralflot1832
              For a good "target" in battle, nothing should be a pity.

              So that's for good.
              And this "baby" is for frigates and corvettes. And the carriers for it are boats and light fighters.
              Rockets for good targets are in a completely different weight category.
              Again, the Turkish Navy does not have such targets,
          2. -2
            21 June 2021 11: 32
            Quote: Jacket in stock
            And so the Turkish missile has a warhead weight of 220 kg, our X35 has 135 kg. Electronics, panimaash.

            Ours are still flying on lamps.
            fellow
      2. +1
        21 June 2021 10: 42
        In a hypersonic missile, the very force of impact on the hull will be "dear mother." Then the explosion of the warhead, and if the fuel in the engine has not burned out, then it will also add.
    2. +5
      21 June 2021 10: 26
      A wounded enemy on the battlefield is "more useful" than a killed one; forces and means will be spent on his salvation. With iron, it's about the same: just make the ship incapacitated and they will start tinkering with it, distracting forces and means, perhaps even the battle pattern will change.
    3. 0
      21 June 2021 12: 53
      Even some non-serious high-explosive action of the warhead, the ship is an ancient rusty laiba. I like it when the enemy ship is annihilated, that is, it evaporates. I hope our anti-ship missiles are more powerful in terms of impact.

      Yeah, even Granite pierces the target, but does not blow it to pieces))) Maybe sink the aircraft carrier, if you're lucky, of course)))
  4. +8
    21 June 2021 09: 58
    The advanced XNUMXD route planning function allows you to perform a wide variety of actions, including bypassing the islands or flying over them.

    There is a clear hint of the numerous Greek islands in the Aegean. There is practically no island in the Black Sea.
    1. +1
      21 June 2021 10: 03
      Why only the Greeks, are you doing well with the Turks? hi
      1. Ren
        +4
        21 June 2021 10: 18
        Quote: tralflot1832
        Why only the Greeks, are you doing well with the Turks?

        Bulgarian islands on the Black Sea:
        St. Ivan Island, bulg. St. Ivan Island, Sozopol Bay;
        St. Cyricus Island, bulg. St. Kirik Island, Sozopol Bay (with an artificial exit to Sozopol);
        St. Peter's Island, bulg. St. Peter Island, Sozopol Bay;
        St. Anastasia Island (Bolshevik), bulg. Anastasia Sveta Island (Bolshevik), in the Atia Bay;
        St. Thomas Island (Snake Island), bulg. St. Thomas Island (Zmiyski Island), Arkutino Bay;
        Ambelitz island, bulg. Ambelits Island, Lozenets Bay;
        Bird Island, bulg. Bird Island, in the Arapya bay;
        Crocodile Island, bulg. Crocodile Island, Stomoplo Bay
        hi
        1. -2
          21 June 2021 12: 12
          These are several small, low islets, close to the coast. Swim to them on an inflatable mattress.
          https://www.flashnews.bg/znaete-li-kolko-morski-ostrova-ima-v-balgariya/
          Compare with the Greek! They reach the very Turkish coast!
      2. 0
        21 June 2021 12: 19
        Why only the Greeks, are you doing well with the Turks?

        With the Turks, not so much, almost all neighbors. But in view of the subject matter and mentioning it is "... function ... including bypassing or flying over islands"The allusion is clearly to Greece. Greece and Turkey have a long-standing confrontation in the Aegean Sea. There are Greek islands off the Turkish coast. The conflict goes beyond the shelf, including around Cyprus. There are often butts between the Greek and Turkish fleets and aviation in this region."
    2. +2
      21 June 2021 10: 19
      I also paid attention to this: in the Black Sea, there are one or two islands, and Greece, no matter how you point your finger, is an island! Although the "island" will not be offered to Ukraine ... although who knows ...
      1. +3
        21 June 2021 10: 45
        Ukraine was just testing its copy of the X-35, just a direct analogue. It may be that the Turks collaborated with them to create this rocket.
    3. 0
      21 June 2021 10: 30
      Quote: pytar
      A hint of the numerous Greek islands is clear

      Nifiga,
      This is a standard feature on a modern rocket.
      1. -2
        21 June 2021 12: 14
        This is a standard feature on a modern rocket.

        And there is. Therefore, I say that it is a hint to Greece. Otherwise, they would not have mentioned it on purpose.
  5. -1
    21 June 2021 10: 51
    The Atmaca missile can be called one of the most ambitious modern attempts to create weapons of its own production by Turkey.
    Something like this, against a weak enemy will come down, trample. The leading powers have the means to neutralize such missiles.
    1. +3
      21 June 2021 13: 20
      In theory, yes, but let's see in practice. The main frigates of Greece are armed with 8 Sparrows and Vulcan Phalangs. Even 2-4 missiles will surely bury this frigate. And this is a half-launch of a Turkish corvette.

      Only 4 MEKO200 frigates with an ESSM VPU have any chances to fight off a group salvo.



      Even if we take Russia with the Black Sea Fleet, then only Moscow and three admirals have real chances to fight off the half-salvo of the corvette. Here's what a conditional Okay should do? The wasp does not even take it for capture. And what should any IPC, Buyans and others do?


      Lightweight, cheap, mass-produced anti-ship missiles are still very effective and versatile. This anti-ship missile system will be fully attached to the F-16.
      1. 0
        21 June 2021 13: 42
        So it is clear that with a massive salvo you can get some ... but this is a matter of tactical training for the command, which SHOULD provide for such an option.
        Where it is necessary to cover, and where it is necessary to prevent it ... in response / preventively, the aggressor may, may be hit by the horns. There are more than one options ...
        This is the same as with the lonely "Shells", which should not stagger here and there alone, but work in coordination with others.
  6. +2
    21 June 2021 10: 56
    tralflot1832
    And what, you can't use a tactical warhead on anti-ship missiles
    To great joy, Turkey does not yet possess nuclear weapons. And if it had, then the ambitions have increased exponentially. Therefore, let them fire a subsonic bullet with a conventional charge. And the world is calmer and the Turks have much to strive for.
    1. 0
      21 June 2021 12: 40
      To great joy, Turkey does not yet possess nuclear weapons. To great joy, Turkey does not yet possess nuclear weapons.

      It does not have it yet, but there are ambitions to acquire it!

      At an economic forum in the city of Sivas in Central Anatolia on September 4, Turkish President Recep Erdogan made a serious statement on nuclear weapons. He said that he considers it unacceptable that Turkey cannot have nuclear weapons. “Some countries have missiles with nuclear warheads, and not one or two. But (they tell us) we cannot have them. This I cannot accept. " "There is not a single developed country in the world that does not have them," Erdogan stressed.

      https://zen.yandex.ru/media/nationalpriorities/erdogan-u-turcii-doljen-byt-svoi-sobstvennyi-iadernyi-arsenal-5dbd3ebce3062c00b16a0142

      https://life.ru/p/1363720
  7. 0
    21 June 2021 11: 17
    Well, Ukraine, too, every day brags about the new military-industrial complex. But in fact, from the Ukrainian there is only yellow-blue paint. The Turks cannot be underestimated, but most of their development is the assembly of imported components.
  8. +1
    21 June 2021 11: 19
    Another clone of Exocet.
  9. 0
    21 June 2021 11: 35
    American Harpoon began to be retired. what That and lo and behold, the CIA will organize another assault by the mint.
  10. -3
    21 June 2021 11: 38
    The cats are kind! I myself have never been a rocket scientist, so I ask you to explain how this rocket can attack the target again? Is she immortal, titanium, self-healing after an explosion?
    1. +1
      21 June 2021 11: 52
      Quote: Cat Alexandrovich
      I myself have never been a rocket scientist, so I ask you to explain how this rocket can attack the target again? She is immortal

      She can stop the attack, change the trajectory, and then return again and already to the end. Or roll it up again, and so on until the kerosene runs out.
  11. 0
    21 June 2021 13: 30
    Yeah. This missile cannot be disabled from a NATO bunker.
  12. -2
    21 June 2021 14: 37
    With the Natsiks in Ukraine it is necessary to end, then the Turks will be calmer.
  13. 0
    21 June 2021 18: 21
    Why didn't she drown this trough? We got hit, but the result? Well, we thought the bulkheads, etc., within a radius of three four meters, this is not fatal for me (I’ve never been a mariman myself). I understand that the target trough was empty and dry, without means of countering both fire and electronic warfare. But did not drown. Did not drown!
  14. -1
    21 June 2021 19: 06
    Turkish Harpoon?