"The Russians are coming, their ships are innumerable, ships have covered the sea!"

40
"The Russians are coming, their ships are innumerable, ships have covered the sea!"
Igor's hike. Illustration from the Radziwill Chronicle

1080 years ago, the Russian fleet of Prince Igor fought the entire southwestern coast of the Black Sea: Bithynia, Paphlagonia, Heraclea of ​​Pontic and Nicomedia. The Bosphorus also suffered - "The whole judgment was burned." Only the famous Greek flamethrowers, who fired "like a million," allowed the Romans to defend Constantinople.

The fighting continued for another three months on the Black Sea coast of Asia Minor. In September 941, the Russian fleet was defeated off the coast of Thrace. The enraged Igor Rurikovich gathered an even larger army, the overseas Varangian Rus and Pechenegs acted as his allies, and moved his troops to Byzantium by sea and land. The Chersonesus Greeks informed the Emperor Romanus:



"Behold, there is an endless ship to sail Russia - ships have covered the essence of the sea!"

When the Rus were already on the Danube, the frightened Greeks sent an embassy, ​​peace between Russia and Byzantium was restored. Igor took a big tribute and returned to Kiev. The Basilevs Roman and Constantine Porphyrogenitus allowed Russia to send as many ships to Constantinople for the sake of bargaining as they wanted. The agreement was confirmed in Kiev on the hill near the idol of Perun and in the church of St. Elijah in Podil.

The causes of the war


Two campaigns of the Russian army and fleet on the Second Rome in 941 and 943, apparently, were caused by some obstacles that the Greeks were doing to Russian trade, despite the 911 treaty concluded between the Russian prince Oleg the Prophet and the Byzantine Basileus Leo VI the Philosopher and Alexander.

Then trade was of great importance for Russia and brought a lot of income to the Kiev princes. It is not only about the way "from the Varangians to the Greeks." But also in export from Russia itself. Every year in the winter period (from November to April), the princes collected a tax - polyudye. He was taken in furs and other goods. Some of the collected goods (for example, food and money) were used to maintain the courtyard and squads. The other part was sold. The Russian merchant fleet was sailing down the Dnieper, Don and Volga. Russian goods ended up in the Volga Bulgaria (Bulgaria), Khazaria, in the eastern countries, in the Caliphate and Byzantium. The Rus reached Ray, Baghdad and Balkh. In fact, the trade in furs and other agricultural and forestry products (honey) was then analogous to the current trade in oil and gas.

That is, this trade was of strategic importance for the Russian princes. In turn, Persian, Greek and Khazar merchants tried to take monopoly positions in this trade. In particular, the Khazars controlled transit and trade routes along the Don and Volga. These are already military-strategic interests. Khazaria, Byzantium and nomadic tribes closed the way for Russia to the south. They controlled the mouths of the most important rivers.

The second Rome was then the leading power in Europe and tried to restrain the development of Russia. The Greek emperors continued the policy of ancient Rome - divide and conquer. They set Khazaria and steppe dwellers on the Slav-Rus.

The Rus responded with powerful campaigns. All the first princes from the Rurik dynasty fought against the Khazars and Greeks. As a result, Igor's heir, Svyatoslav Igorevich, will crush Khazaria, free the routes along the Volga and Don, occupy strategic points in the Northern Black Sea region and begin a struggle with the Greeks for the Danube.

Russian fleet


It is also worth noting that the Russophobic myth, created by the Westerners, that the Russian fleet was created only under Peter I, is a hoax.

The Rus had powerful military and merchant fleets already at least in the XNUMXth – XNUMXth centuries. The Russians brought fleets of thousands of ships-boats into the Black Sea, fought on equal terms with the leader of the West - the Second Rome. Therefore, the Black Sea was then called "Russian". Russian flotillas were active in the north of Europe, in the Baltic, and beyond. Rus (Varangians-Rus, Wends-Vandals-Veneti) reached Spain and broke through into the Mediterranean Sea. The Baltic Sea was called "Venedian" or "Varangian" (Varangians-Rus, Wends - Slavic-Russian tribes, parts of a single Russian superethnos).

The presence of a powerful fleet is a sign of a developed Russian state.

Refutation of yet another "black" myth about Russia-Russia and the Russians, about the supposedly "wild", "unreasonable Slavs" who were civilized by the Vikings-Scandinavians (Germans) and Greek Christian missionaries. The Russian "vertical" and "horizontal" (people's self-government, veche) made it possible to organize the process of building thousands of both combat boats-boats and merchant ships.

These were ships that lifted 20-50 people. A real all-Russian annual production. The ships were preparing from the Dnieper basin to Ilmen. Among the regional collection points for ships were Kiev, Lyubech, Vyshgorod, Chernigov, Novgorod, Smolensk.

The ships were made in winter and part of spring (rigging and rafting). This production required the efforts of thousands of carpenters and shipbuilders. Also the labor of many women who weaved the sails. Add to this the cultivation and spinning of flax and hemp, the manufacture of ship ropes.

The outbreak of war


During this period, the Pechenegs came from the distant steppes of the East to the southern Russian steppes. They drove the tribes of the Magyars (Hungarians) to the west, occupying the lands between the Volga and Danube. The Pechenegs were approaching Kiev, but they were met. Grand Duke Igor Stary "made peace" with the steppe inhabitants. They began to participate in the campaigns of Rus.

However, peace with the Pechenegs was not permanent. New hordes came. Some of the Pechenezh princes were guided by Kiev, others by Khazaria, Chersonesos and Constantinople. The southern section of the trade route "from the Varangians to the Greeks" came under the control of the steppe inhabitants, who could now block the Dnieper rapids. It was possible to go to the Black Sea only with a strong escort, or having peace with the local Pechenegs. It is clear that Constantinople quickly assessed how the empire could benefit from this situation. The Greeks sent gold and rich gifts to the Pechenezh leaders in exchange for "curbing" the opponents of Byzantium - the Magyar Ugrians, Bulgarians (Slavs) and Kiev.

After the Pechenegs occupied the southern Russian steppes, Byzantium began to "forget" about the 911 treaty. In Constantinople-Tsargrad, they again begin to offend Russian "guests" (merchants).

Although the alliance with the Rus was beneficial to Byzantium itself. Russian squads regularly fought on the side of the Greeks against the Arabs and other enemies of the empire. So, in 936, the Russian squads and the rook fleet fought on the side of the Second Rome on the coast of southern Italy, receiving a large payment for this. Obviously, the Greeks believed that the Russians would no longer be able to withdraw the fleet and army to Constantinople and repeat the success of Oleg the Prophet. However, the Greeks miscalculated.

Igor Rurikovich confirmed peace with the Pechenegs and gathered a large army. The Russian chronicle reports about 10 thousand ships, but this figure is apparently exaggerated. The Pechenegs missed the huge Russian army. The ship's army was on the Dnieper, the cavalry along the coast.

The campaign did not come as a surprise to Constantinople.

The Rus first attacked the provinces of Byzantium in Asia Minor. Also, the Bulgarians who lived in the lower reaches of the Danube and the Kherson strata informed about Igor's campaign. Therefore, the Greeks managed to mobilize and bring up troops from the provinces and, most importantly, the fleet that held back the Arabs and defended the islands in the Mediterranean. The Greek fleet blocked the passage through the Bosphorus. Russian soldiers who landed on the shores of the strait brutally devastated the imperial lands. Obviously, since the army was large, Igor had the opportunity to separate separate fleets that fought the entire southwestern coast of the Black Sea, devastating provinces such as Bithynia, Paphlagonia, Heraclea Pontic and Nicomedia.

Battle at sea


Emperor Roman Lakapin, a famous warrior and former commander of the fleet, eventually decided to give a naval battle to the dew.

The Greek fleet, under the command of the experienced Theophanes Protovestiary, met the Russians at Iskrest - the so-called high tower that stood on a cliff north of the Bosphorus. A lamp was installed on its top, and in stormy weather it served as a lighthouse. Byzantine sailors had a strong trump card - "Greek fire". The composition of the fuel mixture was the empire's greatest secret. The fire was started with the help of special devices, which were installed on the bow, stern and on the sides. In close combat, fire was released under pressure through copper pipes. Greek flamethrowers, shooting "like lightning from heaven", terrified the opponents of the Second Rome. Throwing tools were also used, throwing out earthenware vessels filled with Greek fire.

It is believed that on June 11, 941, the Russians faced Greek fire for the first time, and the memory of this was preserved for a long time among the Russian warriors.

The weather that day was calm. This was favorable for the dews, since the boats were sailing-rowing ships and could move well and maneuver at the oars. But the calm turned out to be favorable for the Romans. In conditions of strong excitement, the Greeks could not use flamethrowers, as they could burn their ships. The Russians began rapprochement with the enemy to capture the Greek ships and their crews for ransom.
The Greeks began to "throw fire in all directions." The Greek fire contained oil, and it burned even in water. It was impossible to extinguish this mixture under the conditions of that time. When the ship caught fire, his crew had to throw themselves into the water. The Russian flotilla was defeated. Many warriors drowned.

However, part of the Russian fleet and individual detachments survived. They retreated to the coast of Asia Minor. Russian squads, having landed on the coast, again smashed cities and villages. Horse and foot detachments of the dews penetrated quite far into the depths of the Greek lands. There were separate battles with Byzantine troops and ships on the coast.

Basilevs had to send his elite forces with the best commanders: Patricius Varda and John Kurkuas to fight the northern "barbarians". They were able to push the Russians back to the ships. The shallow waters became a kind of base for the Russians: here they were safe from attacks from land and from the sea. The heavy ships of the Greeks could not operate effectively in these places. The confrontation lasted until mid-September.

A period of storms began, the Russians decided to return to their homeland. Russian boats went to the shores of Thrace (the eastern part of the Balkans). There, apparently, there were horse squads led by Igor. However, the Byzantine fleet was able to lie in wait for the Russians and inflicted a new defeat on them. Only a part of the rooks were able to leave. The Greeks took many prisoners. All were executed.


The use of "Greek fire". Miniature of the Madrid copy of the Chronicle of John Skilitsa

"Igor went to the Greeks"


The failure of the first campaign did not stop Igor. He began to gather a new army. Obviously, if the Rus had suffered a heavy defeat and lost most of the fleet and army, they would not have been able to march so soon again. The Greeks, as usual, greatly embellished their victory.

Before again opposing Byzantium, Igor sends squads to the Caspian. The Rus make a successful expedition into the possession of the Caliphate, crushing detachments of many thousands of Muslims. At the same time, troops are gathering for a new campaign against Constantinople. In 944, Igor set out with an even larger army, attracted the Varangians and Pechenegs.

Russian troops reached the Danube, but the matter did not come to war. The Chersonese Greeks and Bulgarians informed the Emperor Roman that the Russians were coming with an innumerable fleet and Pechenegs. Roman Lakapin this time did not dare to go to war. He sent ambassadors to Igor and asked:

"Do not go, but take the tribute that Oleg took, and I will add more to this tribute."

The Russian prince gathered a council with his warriors. The squad replied:

“… What else do we need: without struggling, let's take gold, and silver, and poultry! After all, no one knows who will prevail: we or they! Or who is in alliance with the sea? We do not walk on the ground, but in the depths of the sea: a common death for all. "

Igor Stary listened to them, took a big tribute from the Greeks and returned to Kiev.

Thus, Russia won the war.

Byzantium paid tribute and agreed to restore the old world. The following year, the Byzantine Basileus sent an embassy to Kiev to conclude a new peace treaty. The treaty was approved in Kiev in two places: Prince Igor and his men took an oath on the hill where Perun (a thunderer, patron saint of warriors) stood. The Rus, who converted to Christianity, swore an oath in the cathedral church of St. Elijah in Podil.

The agreement created favorable conditions for trade between Russians and Greeks. In particular, the Russians could live for six months in Constantinople, the empire supported them at that time at the expense of the treasury. The Russian ships, thrown ashore during the storm, now the owners of this section of the coast did not rob, but provided assistance to the victims.

Russia again became a military ally of the Second Rome.
40 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +10
    18 June 2021 05: 03
    ***

    ...

    Remember now you are my word:

    Glory to the warrior - joy;

    Your name is glorified by victory:

    Your shield at the gates of Constantinople ...

    ...

    Pushkin

    ***
    1. +8
      18 June 2021 05: 42
      How is prophetic Oleg now gathered
      To nail the shield on the gate ... good
    2. +2
      18 June 2021 06: 48
      an article written on the basis of the Tale of Bygone Years in several lists written by the monk of the Pechersk monastery Nestor, of course, cannot convey the whole reality of that time.
      Firstly, the Pechersky Monastery itself is a building of the 18th century - the Baroque style. In the city of Kiev there are no buildings earlier than the 18th century, so the very references to the fact that in the "ancient" Pechersky / Cave "monastery already in the 12th century there was a holy Christian monastery at least simply not proven fact.
      Second: it turns out that Nestor wrote his chronicles after 500 years, and the events of the campaign against Igor against Tsar Grad 200 years later, which means that Nestor must have his own sources about which he does not mention at all and, accordingly, we do not know anything.
      Thirdly, the PVL mentions the city on the Danube of Kiev, built by Prince Rurik, and of course there must be settlements of the Slavs, those same Wends. Therefore, the Wends lived from the Baltic to the Adriatic and the Danube at least.

      The Baltic Sea was called "Venedian" or "Varangian" (Varangians-Rus, Wends - Slavic-Russian tribes, parts of a single Russian superethnos).

      -Venice-crown in Ruska
      -Vienna-from Wends
      -Hungary-Vendian garnished in Cossack. A strange country around the Slavs, and here you have the Finougrians, but they kept the name from the Vends. It is clear that these Slavs had to participate in the campaigns of the Eastern Slavs-Rus on Constantinople, but historical science does not like to talk about German Slavs and about the Danube Slavs.
      It is clear that the PVL contains only part of the truth, and then only in order to give the chronicle the appearance of veracity.
      Tsarist historical science, which was called upon to justify the presence of Christianity among the Rus / Slavs and Romanovs / Germans at the head of the Slavic state, was for some reason called upon to become the basis for historical science in the proletarian state of Lenin-Stalin, which is suspicious if the USSR refused to succeed (nnda ) the most important property of different economic structures, then it was necessary to question the tsarist "science" of history, especially since there is something to doubt about.
      1. +2
        18 June 2021 07: 28
        "Venice-the crown in Russian
        -Vienna-from Wends
        -Hungary-Vendian garnished in Cossack. A strange country around the Slavs, and here you have Finougri, but the name has been preserved "(c)
        Pavel! For completeness of perception! Vend (vend) is Estonian "brother". Draw etymological conclusions.
        1. +1
          18 June 2021 19: 39
          Alexander, in this case, the Baltic is a "brotherly" sea.?
          If we build versions on consonance. Then you can get to FIG knows where.
          Р
          S
          Good evening. Sorry for not saying hello right away.
          1. 0
            19 June 2021 00: 25
            and my pebble - balta is an ax
          2. +2
            19 June 2021 10: 46
            A bit wrong. If the "Venedian" sea is the Russians, then the etiology turns out to be Russian brothers.
            1. +1
              19 June 2021 14: 17
              It's funny. This etymology will not work either with you or with us. She is not: "patriotic", but now it is "topical"
              1. +1
                19 June 2021 18: 02
                It is the matter of time. For Russians, this is all purple. And Estonians don't even think about it.
        2. -1
          18 June 2021 20: 21
          Quote: ee2100
          Pavel! For completeness of perception! Vend (vend) is Estonian "brother". Draw etymological conclusions


          Yes it is known, although what brother is Russian to the Chukhonts?
          1. +1
            19 June 2021 10: 43
            Relatives are not chosen drinks
      2. +1
        18 June 2021 17: 05
        "Pechersky monastery - buildings of the 18th century" in this case, and PVL was written in the 18th century. So logically it turns out. If we assume that they periodically changed their living space to a more comfortable one, and the old one was destroyed due to dilapidation. In my opinion it is quite logical
        1. +2
          18 June 2021 20: 44
          Quote: Astra wild2
          "Pechersky monastery - buildings of the 18th century" in this case, and PVL was written in the 18th century. So logically it turns out. If we assume that they periodically changed their living space to a more comfortable one, and the old one was destroyed due to dilapidation. In my opinion it is quite logical


          there are no buildings older than the Pechersky Monastery and the St. Sophia Cathedral in Kiev. The historians of this school say that the monastery was rebuilt and on the old foundations of the 11th century there is a new Baroque temple and they are right here, in fact, most likely the old walls remained from the previous temples, as apparently remained old stones of the same Stonehenge, but new structures and new stones were built and now it is not so easy to figure out what is real and what is a remake.
          But the most important thing is that churchmen and historians attribute to the Kiev-Pechersk Lavra a deep antiquity, but not "deep antiquity" and not a Christian church, but some kind of Old Believer church that was destroyed, and then a new Christian church was erected on these walls.
          And how aggressive the Christians of this church were, you can hear from Pyzhikov about the metropolitan-coloborotionist Peter Mogila, or about how the Jesuits went from the Pechersk Church across Russia.
          1. 0
            19 June 2021 21: 41
            A Church of the Tithes in Kiev
            date grounds
            The first temple: 996-1240 (destroyed by Khan Batu)
            Second temple: 1630s-1828 (destroyed during the construction of the third temple)
            Third temple: 1842-1928 (destroyed by the Soviet regime
            Data from Wiki:
            The Church of the Tithes (Church of the Assumption of the Most Holy Theotokos) on Starokievskaya Mountain in Kiev is the first stone Orthodox church in Russia, erected by Vladimir Svyatoslavich on the site of the death of the Russian first martyrs Theodore Varyag and his son John
            1. 0
              19 June 2021 22: 17
              Quote: No name B
              Third temple: 1842-1928 (destroyed by the Soviet regime


              Well, yes, yes, she swam, but to say on these grounds that Kiev, some kind of "ancient" city, is just impudence from the OI.
      3. 0
        13 September 2021 21: 10
        It is noticeable that you are fond of alternative history, but it is still useful to know certain facts, for example, about the historical buildings of Kiev. There are many funny inscriptions and drawings))) Nestor, of course, was not telling a story, but a historical myth, but based on real events.
  2. 0
    18 June 2021 05: 18
    The period of the history of ancient Russia is very exciting ... you read it like a poem.
    All the same, Western historians failed to destroy it.
    1. +4
      18 June 2021 13: 13
      Quote: Lech from Android.
      All the same, Western historians failed to destroy it.

      And they wanted, right? And how did they do it? And most importantly, how do you personally know about this?
      Just three questions ...
      1. 0
        24 June 2021 12: 12
        They wanted and want, tried and tried. All sorts of "putriarchs" say that the pagan Slavs were "almost beasts", and the priests civilized them, which in itself is nonsense. Even a simple example is writing: the Cyrillic alphabet was brought to Russia by two Bulgarian homeless people - Cyril and Methodius. If you believe the priests, then before these crooks the wild Slavs could not read and write. But there are historical artifacts confirming the existence of writing long before the "writers". By the way, one of these homeless people, I don’t remember exactly which one, wrote that in Russia he saw a “sacred scripture” written in Russian initial letters. But the Bulgarians out of 49, like, drop caps, did not understand everything, so they introduced priestly primitivization, throwing out incomprehensible drop caps. In general, the introduction of Christianity very much threw Russia culturally, as was the case with Greece, with Italy, when the priests destroyed everything related to the culture of the people seized (religiously, including by force). These are facts.
  3. -3
    18 June 2021 05: 21
    After the campaigns on Constantinople, since the Russians cannot be won in a fair battle, the cunning Greeks (there were also many Armenians there) decided to act through ideology. This is how Christianity was adopted in Russia.
    As a result, fragmentation and, as a consequence, the Tatar-Mongol yoke.
  4. -3
    18 June 2021 05: 56
    Thanks to the author for interesting material!
  5. +9
    18 June 2021 06: 40
    The Baltic Sea was called "Venedian" or "Varangian" (Varangians-Rus, Wends - Slavic-Russian tribes, parts of a single Russian superethnos)
    Only the Scandinavians (Swedes, Danes, Norwegians) and Germans did not know about this and called it the East Sea. Historically, in Russian, the Baltic Sea was called the Varangian Sea, and then the Sveiskiy (Swedish) Sea. And under Peter I, the German name was strengthened - the Ostsee (Eastern) Sea. In addition, it should be noted that the form of the Baltic Sea was used on Russian maps from somewhere in the 30s of the 1884th century. The modern name has been in use since 789. For the Baltic tribes it was the Baltic Sea, the Estonians called the Western Sea. There was a time when the Baltic Sea was called the Sarmatian Ocean, Tacitus in his writings calls the Baltic Sea the Sveb Sea. the period from 1072 to 1081 is described. Adam of Bremen lived in the XI century, the year of birth is unknown as well as death, presumably died in XNUMX.
    1. +1
      19 June 2021 14: 24
      Alexey, thank you for the insight into the history of the toponym: "Baltic" sea
  6. +17
    18 June 2021 07: 10
    an article based on the Tale of Bygone Years

    The article was written from Wikipedia with the addition of a delirium about superethnos and errors illustrating the author's ignorance in the issue under consideration.
    Greek fleet under the command of the experienced Theophanes Protovestiary

    Protovestiary is not the name of Theophanes, but his position. In Byzantium, the head of the imperial dressing room, the master of ceremonies was called the protovestiary. Sometimes protovestiaries were assigned to lead an army or navy.
    1. +3
      19 June 2021 14: 33
      "illustrating the ignorance of the author" Victor Nikolaevich, good afternoon. If you remember what the author is capable of, then the article is almost a success
  7. +11
    18 June 2021 07: 36
    On VO, a few years ago, there was a calculation article. How many supplies do you need to take on the ship to sail from Kiev to Constantinople and based on the size of the ships, the number of the crew was calculated.
    That was real research!
    This article is like a fairy tale for primary school children.
  8. +2
    18 June 2021 09: 14
    An interesting topic, but a jumble of terminology, sources. Something from Wiki, something from Zadornov, something from the author. The author, you at least look through the PVL, for the sake of interest. There, the chronicler calls the Black Sea Pontic and Russian. some unknown Persian "obscurantist" smile in his book on the description of the land (there is some other name, I don't remember exactly) the Black Sea calls the Georgian one, which is interesting that this book was written in the XNUMXth century, if I am not mistaken.
  9. +6
    18 June 2021 09: 20
    But it may happen that the digest from the comments to the article may turn out to be more interesting than the article itself ... It is very "school". And so, without pretending to be a digest of interesting comments ...
    An interesting fate of the Radziwill Chronicle, a miniature from which "Igor's Campaign" illustrates the beginning of the article. This Radziwill Chronicle was the first of the Russian tsars in Koenigsberg to see Peter the Great and demanded that a copy of the Radziwill Chronicle be made. So the list of the Radziwill Chronicle from Koenigsberg appeared in Russia as a copy. And he calls it the Königsberg List. But Catherine the Great demanded that the original of the Radziwill Chronicle itself be delivered from Konigsberg to St. Petersburg for verification, whether Peter the Great matches the brought copy to the original. They brought the original of this Radziwill chronicle from Koenigsberg to St. Petersburg, and Catherine the Great in Konigsberg did not intend to return the chronicle and left the chronicle in Russia, where this chronicle is still kept. So there are at least two Radziwill Chronicles in Russia. Under Peter, the Koenigsberg copy was brought and under Catherine the original was brought.
    And this Radziwill Chronicle ended up in Königsberg because the heir to Radziwill, Prince Boguslav, handed it over to the library of the Königsberg University ...
    1. +1
      19 June 2021 14: 45
      "The empress" forgot to return the chronicle and was not going to ", and the Prussian king did not want to quarrel with Catherine and" advised "the university not to appear
  10. +4
    18 June 2021 12: 28
    In fact, the trade in furs and other agricultural and forestry products (honey) was then analogous to the current trade in oil and gas.

    The slave trade was forgotten. The same Arabs and Greeks do not hide what the main commodity of the Rus was.
    Basilevs Roman and Konstantin Porphyrogenitus

    Yes Porphyrogenitus, what side here? All politics was done by Roman Lakapin, Constantine was a basileus under him purely formally, until he overthrew Roman with the help of his own children.
    The Greeks took many captives. All were executed.

    Well, what else were they supposed to do with cruel killers? According to the Follower of Theophanes, the dew "of some prisoners was crucified on a cross, others were hammered into the ground, others were set as targets and shot from bows. They tied their hands behind their backs to prisoners from the priestly estate and drove iron nails into their heads." And other chroniclers describe a lot of the atrocities of the dews.
    Interestingly, according to the "Cambridge Document", Khazaria played a significant role in this war, but how reliable this is is a question, the chroniclers sometimes were not averse to lying.
    1. +3
      18 June 2021 14: 24
      The slave trade was forgotten. The same Arabs and Greeks do not hide what the main commodity of the Rus was.

      Our historians are shyly silent about this. Although it is obvious that you cannot sell much furs and honey.
      And taking into account the capture of the full local population, the path from the Varangians to the Greeks acquires a clear economic sense.
      We are collecting the Varangian squad in Scandinavia. And we sail east through the Baltic Sea, and then along the rivers to the south. On the way, we capture prisoners, plunder local settlements located along the rivers. We take the loot and slaves to Constantinople, where we exchange them for silk, products made of precious metals. We swim back to the north on the way again we rob the Slavs living along the banks of the rivers, we capture the captives. We return to Scandinavia with new Slavic slaves and exotic Greek goods. Profitable enterprise!
      1. 0
        19 June 2021 01: 17
        And we sail east through the Baltic Sea, and then along the rivers to the south. On the way, we capture prisoners, plunder local settlements located along the rivers.

        And - how do you imagine this event? On drakkars through a bunch of drags, through small rivers, through a rather densely populated land not the most peaceful population - and so dashingly, with a whistle, robbing and capturing everyone around? And all this - we still manage to drag it to Constantinople in order to sell the swag?
        1. +1
          19 June 2021 19: 36
          It is quite possible that this is the most "not the most peaceful population" and supplied them with live goods at reasonable prices.
        2. +1
          21 June 2021 10: 23
          The Vikings imagined this event just like that, and most importantly they carried it out in practice, plundering densely populated areas of England, France (they sailed on drakkars to Paris), Spain, etc. all the way to Sicily.
          And the locals, I think, were not averse to selling them prisoners from neighboring villages.
          You need to understand that it is one thing to have an equipped squad of thugs-thugs, and another to a local peasant militia, which still needs to be assembled and which at this time is engaged in field work. Vikings won't wait
  11. +2
    18 June 2021 13: 31
    It is also worth noting that the Russophobic myth, created by the Westerners, that the Russian fleet was created only under Peter I, is a hoax.
    just created. After the loss of access to the Black and Baltic Seas, there was nowhere to keep a large military fleet. And this is not only ships, but also personnel, school, traditions that do not immediately arise.
    Obviously, if the Rus had suffered a heavy defeat and lost most of the fleet and army, they would not have been able to march so soon again.
    conflicts with previous paragraphs
    The Russian flotilla was defeated. Many warriors drowned.
    the Byzantine fleet was able to lie in wait for the Russians and inflicted a new defeat on them. Only a part of the rooks were able to leave. The Greeks took many prisoners. All were executed.

    Russia again became a military ally of the Second Rome.
    the "ally" is good:
    The second Rome was then the leading power in Europe and tried to restrain the development of Russia. The Greek emperors continued the policy of ancient Rome - divide and conquer. They set Khazaria and steppe dwellers on the Slav-Rus.
    1. Alf
      +1
      18 June 2021 18: 56
      Quote: Igor Ushakov
      the "ally" is good:
      The second Rome was then the leading power in Europe and tried to restrain the development of Russia. The Greek emperors continued the policy of ancient Rome - divide and conquer. They set Khazaria and steppe dwellers on the Slav-Rus.

      Exactly the behavior of the current "partners" ...
  12. +2
    19 June 2021 12: 59
    Varangians-Rus, Wends-Vandals-Veneti


    What kind of hodgepodge is this? Not really, the author thinks that vandals and Vikings are the same thing. Fomenko nervously smokes on the sidelines.
    1. 0
      19 June 2021 22: 01
      A new version about the Varangians has been announced on the Yashar website. That these are not Vikings, in the Scandinavian sagas there is no mention of the Vikings rulers in Russia. The Varangians are the Slavs who lived on the island of Rügen, who were very militant and fought back both the Vikings and the Germans and the attackers themselves. And also the Slavs from the Udrite tribe, who founded the most powerful state, the modern German city of McLenburg is in fact the capital of the Slavic Udrite tribe. So the ruler of the encouraged had three sons - Rurik, Sineus and Truvor, who, after the death of their father, were threatened with the death penalty by the uncle who reigned on the throne. And from this moment the history of Russia begins ...
      On YouTube, on the Yasharu channel, there is a video in two parts, where this story is analyzed in detail and, it seems to me, an end has been made about the Varangians - these are the Slavs who are encouraged.
      1. 0
        20 July 2021 21: 10
        This "new" version, by and large, was promoted by Tatishchev and Lomonosov. But serious historians and archaeologists do not quote it from the word at all - if the presence of Scandinavians in Russia is undoubted, then there is no presence of Western Slavs (although V.V. Sedov once argued the opposite) ..
        1. 0
          13 September 2021 21: 18
          Why do you consider only one version of the essentially Norman only from a different angle ???