US Air Force complains about Russian strategic missile carriers flying near Alaska

40
US Air Force complains about Russian strategic missile carriers flying near Alaska

The US Air Force has complained about Russian strategic missile carriers flying near Alaska. As it turned out, the aircraft of the Russian Aerospace Forces caused an excessive load on the American F-22 fighters, which are very expensive to maintain. MilitaryWatch writes about it.

Russia has significantly increased the number of flights off the coast of America, especially in Alaska, the US Air Force said. To counter Russian aircraft, the fifth generation F-22 fighters deployed at Elmendorf-Richardson airbase have to be lifted into the air. The fact is that it is the most efficient fighter in the US Air Force in the region.



The flights of Russian planes force the command to keep the F-22 in constant combat readiness, lift them into the sky to "intercept" and prepare them on the ground. Given that these are not the "cheapest" aircraft in the US Air Force, their maintenance and combat readiness is very expensive.

Russia, the Americans say, is increasingly sending turboprop Tu-95MS to the US coast - ideal for long-term patrols and much cheaper to operate. And other aircraft of the Russian Aerospace Forces, for example, the anti-submarine Tu-142, which appear off the coast of the United States, are again forced to lift the F-22 into the air.

All hope is with the command of the American Air Force on the F-35, which is being deployed in Alaska. Compared to the F-22, the operation of the F-35 is significantly cheaper, but they are still far from combat readiness. So for now it is necessary to burn the resource of the "very expensive" F-22s.
40 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    15 June 2021 15: 36
    sleep or something interfere)))
    1. +5
      15 June 2021 16: 22
      -have to burn the resource of the "very expensive" F-22.
      The first thing we spoil the planes
      1. 0
        15 June 2021 17: 15
        They are just going to give them up. They will write off faster, get new 35s faster))
    2. +3
      15 June 2021 16: 33
      I don't know what the mattresses have, but today Swan showed off a couple of times at low altitude. Handsome ..
    3. +1
      15 June 2021 16: 45
      Quote: Palestinian
      sleep or something interfere)))

      Most likely it’s a pity for the money, so they whined.
      1. +1
        16 June 2021 08: 34
        Let them sit at airbases, do not whine, save money. And then they flew to interceptions!
  2. +2
    15 June 2021 15: 38
    US Air Force complains about Russian strategic missile carriers flying near Alaska
    ... They sho, train for a day? Yes, and for the flight hours, for sure, after all, pay extra! Or are they afraid to fly? Interesno WHY?
    1. +9
      15 June 2021 15: 43
      The cost of an hour of flight of the best fighter in the world is higher than the cost of flights of all Tu95s that have ever appeared there, it strangles the toad. :))
      1. +3
        15 June 2021 16: 09
        So it was probably the Air Force accounting department that set up the complaint !!! then everything is clear.
        1. +3
          15 June 2021 16: 45
          We give them a reason to practice, they are still unhappy. You see, they do not fit into the estimate, the green papers are quickly running out, and the Pentagon delays the transfers and asks to save money.
        2. +2
          15 June 2021 21: 03
          Quote: rocket757
          the Air Force accounting department set up a complaint !!

          The chief financial officer went into a binge. crying drinks
        3. +1
          16 June 2021 15: 48
          Duck probably the motor resource of the 22nd is not eternal, if the maize workers had a sufficient radius, it would be worth driving them there for days and the f-22 would go down in history much faster (probably there are bright minds in the MO) laughing
          1. +1
            17 June 2021 07: 34
            If a rocket airship is launched at minimum speed for a week's voyage around Alaska, then all the fuel will surely run out. I suggested it for a long time laughing
            To answer all complaints that the carbon footprint is minimal, the birds are not scared, the noise is minimal, the emissions are minimal and we do not want to scare anyone.
      2. 0
        16 June 2021 08: 26
        You states do not worry, they will print money for themselves
  3. +1
    15 June 2021 15: 40
    All this nonsense ... not every day Bears fly near Alaska.
    1. +4
      15 June 2021 16: 05
      Quote: Lech from Android.
      not every day Bears fly near Alaska.

      And sho? I'm flying, I'm not bothering anyone, I'm fixing a primus! ))))
      In general, it is interesting whether it is possible to disable their fighters with overloading by some flights "past"?
      1. 0
        15 June 2021 16: 37
        It is possible on the Internet in flight simulators ... smile
  4. +2
    15 June 2021 15: 40
    Russian strategic missile carriers are ravaging the United States.
    1. 0
      15 June 2021 19: 28
      Quote: Ash Poseidon
      Russian strategic missile carriers are ravaging the United States.

      They will not ruin them, of course, but they will force the US strategic aviation to leave Norway in a few weeks or months, if flights of our Tu-95s begin more often. So far, only we make it clear to them that we do not like their presence - this is what we did in the days of the USSR.
  5. 0
    15 June 2021 15: 42
    Where did they "complain", to the sport lotto or what? Usually they immediately write to VO: scared / hysterical / in a panic ... And here they just "complained", a flaw.
  6. 0
    15 June 2021 15: 42
    "US Air Force Complain" ... It is a pity that it is not specified, to whom are they complaining? At Sportloto? At the UN? Sleepy Joe? To the League? Or the Russian Ministry of Finance?
    1. +1
      15 June 2021 16: 07
      Quote: Cat Alexandrovich
      Or the Russian Ministry of Finance?

      Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh! Don't prompt! And then they will demand compensation!
  7. The comment was deleted.
  8. +1
    15 June 2021 15: 46
    Ahahaha. Let's launch another UAV! Let the Americans wear the latest F22. lol
  9. +7
    15 June 2021 15: 46
    Well, bring in a dozen F-16s, business ... Just like small children, they are offended, then they are ruined, then they vote for them in the elections, the gas is not where it should be and not where it should be driven. Kindergarten...
    1. +2
      15 June 2021 16: 12
      It seems I understood why Ukraine is complaining about everyone - it takes an example from the owner: "... everything is not so, everything is not so, guys ..." as we would like ...
      1. +1
        15 June 2021 22: 19
        Just the opposite. The Americans have been complaining / scared / in panic over the actions of the Russian army and navy for about 20 years. And the Ukrainians whine that their Muscovites have been eating lard for 140000 years.
  10. AB
    +3
    15 June 2021 15: 51
    The US Air Force has complained about Russian strategic missile carriers flying near Alaska.

    And what are they complaining about? They would return Alaska and sleep peacefully.
  11. Mwg
    +2
    15 June 2021 16: 01
    "... the aircraft of the Russian Aerospace Forces caused an excessive load on the American F-22 fighters, which are very expensive to maintain." - so, you see, on the interceptions of our missile carriers, American F-22s will burn the entire resource))))))))))))))))))
  12. +1
    15 June 2021 16: 02
    And then, minke whales almost every day in the Black Sea patrol along the coast of the Crimea and the Caucasus, they are not very puzzled ???
  13. 0
    15 June 2021 16: 20
    The photo is interesting. How to beat with cannons on the dark side! (so simple, thoughts out loud)
  14. +2
    15 June 2021 16: 22
    All hope is with the command of the American Air Force on the F-35, which is being deployed in Alaska. Compared to the F-22, the operation of the F-35 is significantly cheaper, but they are still far from combat readiness. So for now it is necessary to burn the resource of the "very expensive" F-22s.


    Nothing you have a lot of money ...
  15. 0
    15 June 2021 16: 32
    Ours to keep the US Air Force in good shape, otherwise they would not have been repaired. We waited until their famous ALIS self-diagnosis system, will order spare parts for itself
  16. +1
    15 June 2021 16: 39
    Our grandfather "Bear" will outlive many of the newest US fighters.
    And they, sick people, all made fun of the old man ...
  17. 0
    15 June 2021 16: 41
    So that's good. We need to increase the number of sorties. Let them twitch.
  18. +1
    15 June 2021 17: 27
    So today we also trained NATO members in the Baltic. Two TU 160s flew over the Baltic. Again, Italians flew in penguins to take pictures.
  19. +4
    15 June 2021 21: 14
    The photo is, of course, unique ...
    Like "Ilya Muromets" and MiG-15
  20. +3
    16 June 2021 09: 32
    ***
    Russian strategic missile carriers do not fly near Alaska, but near Chukotka ...
    ***
    1. 0
      18 June 2021 22: 27
      By the way, we could have returned Alaska, since it is so expensive.
  21. 0
    16 June 2021 17: 02
    The US Air Force has complained about Russian strategic missile carriers flying near Alaska. As it turned out, the aircraft of the Russian Aerospace Forces caused an excessive load on the American F-22 fighters, which are very expensive to maintain. MilitaryWatch writes about it.

    Poor you poor! How sorry I am for you.
    Maybe send your aircraft to a landfill so that it doesn't get overwhelmed, huh?
  22. 0
    18 June 2021 22: 25
    Well, who forbade them to stay in their own beloved "open sky"? Now all their complaints have a simple answer - losers.