The West "identified" the combat center of the frigate "Marshal Shaposhnikov"

Western observers have been keeping an eye on the addition of Russian fleet new ships, their modernization, equipment and movement. This time, their attention was drawn to a naval exercise in the Pacific.

Observer Charly0153 attempted to identify the ship by the combat information center located on board. As noted, judging by the equipment, it is equipped with new tracking and control systems.

The idea was that the "Admiral Shaposhnikov" is being demonstrated after the modernization. But the fact is that it could have been the corvette Tsydenzhapov [Hero of the Russian Federation Aldar Tsydenzhapov], who was also present at the exercises

- explains the author.

In this regard, he carefully compared the footage from the uploaded video material. As a result, it was discovered that one of the ship's surveillance cameras shows the area in the bow, visible from the bridge, and on it one can see the Shaposhnikov's forms, which ultimately “cleared up doubts”.

In these images we see the combat center of the frigate

- writes Charly0153.

In response, one of the users indicated that the ship had a "rather spacious CIC [CIC - Combat Information Center]":

Well, it's just a mastodon.

After the recent completion of the modernization of the large anti-submarine ship Marshal Shaposhnikov, it was reclassified as a frigate in view of the receipt of tactical missile armament "Caliber" and "Uranus" with the possibility of equipping with promising anti-ship missiles "Zircon".

Comments

[-Dmitry-]

Shaposhnikov lost some weight in the exterior ... In the old form, he was much more beautiful! There is no talk about combat effectiveness, but in the "old" "extrem" it was much better :)

[Nikon O'Conor]

About combat effectiveness. While the mattresses say:

corvette "Tsydenzhapov"

they will be drowned 10 times

[Thrifty]

This reminds me a little of the discussion of toilets on the dacha sideak of the ukroflot, you see, Western members of the forum could not see anything interesting. ...

[Well done]

Western observers? Sofa experts? What were they shown? And what the adversaries should see is nothing superfluous, let the mastodons guess.

[Igor Vorobyov]

And what are you not a sofa expert, or you gave your whole life to the fleet, they were shown what they need, everything that they say shows that our weapons are theirs, it's all a legend, no one will reveal the secret, or all the bloggers and sofa experts would cut down the forest , so all these reviews are not read with a grin

[URAL72]

Isn't it a bit too much 7500 tons full for a frigate? Yes, the air defense of the near zone is rather weak, but calibers with a range of 2500 km are generally a cruising level. Such a task is not assigned to the frigate - by default, he is an anti-submarine ...

[dranthqu]

Anti-submarine and anti-ship missiles also fit into the UKSK. From my couch, it looks like a good platform for PLO as part of the KUG.

[Popandos]

Everything has long been "mixed up in the Obolonskys' house", now some snotty boat can be equipped with something strategic.

[knn54]

During WWII, the British created the MEDIUM class of BNK, which was not as fast and well armed as destroyers - did not have weapons against submarines or aircraft, but had more patrol boats, and withstood ocean storms / waves. In general, a NEW class of ships "frigate" has appeared for escorting convoys.
For there was a chronic shortage of destroyers. In 1940, the Yankes transferred 50 old destroyers to replace several (99-year lease) British bases.
In general, the Soviet classification of warships is more clear to me, and it is not entirely correct to classify a BOD as a frigate.

[Yuri V.A]

What is understandable here, if the Petrels are correctly ranked as frigates, and Udalye are not? You have to add a rank, but it turns out to be some kind of jumble. As the apotheosis of such a system - the term MPLATRK, ugh, you will break your language. By the way, when defining large ships as "Global Battle Ship", the class is traditionally called Frigate, a capacious and beautiful word. Again, after WWII, large missile escort ships, which were larger than destroyers, but smaller than cruisers, were called frigates, however, after they were outplayed.

[-Dmitry-]

In general, I'm talking about the BOD 1155 project - very beautiful ships were, as it seems to me, the most beautiful ships of the latest Soviet projects. If we take not atomic ones. Kirov, of course, is also handsome. Although Slava too, I think 1155 is better. As well as destroyers 956, but they seem to me like the smaller brothers 1155 were :) less beautiful :)

[Alexey Koshkarov]

BPK Komsomolets of Ukraine is also beautiful

[lucul]

As noted, judging by the equipment, it is equipped with new tracking and control systems.

Well, the opponents said that modernization was useless.)))

[Azis]

"The BOD changed the PC monitors from CRT to LCD, and it became a frigate." What does the past classification not like? Frigates, corvettes, galleons, triremes, galleys ... Oops, you can't talk about galleys and crabs.

[tralflot1832]

The most important thing was not considered, in the left corner there is an electrical panel with buttons water with gas and without gas? !!!

[Alexander Terentyev]

Under the keel of these frigates, the enemies could not see the silhouettes of huge cigar-shaped bodies ...
They were submarines, aiming at everything around for hundreds of miles ...

[mmaxx]

The comments are like gossip. This way, this way ...