The Ministry of Defense named the number of tanks planned for delivery to the troops by the end of the year

12 2021 June 35

The Ministry of Defense announced the arrival of modern tanks in the formations and units of the Ground Forces. According to the statement of the military department, by the end of the year the troops will receive about 200 tanks.

According to the report, T-72B3, T-72B3M, T-80BVM and T-90M tanks will be supplied to the Ground Forces under the state defense order. Speaking about the number of armored vehicles, the military department clarified that 90 modernized T-72B3 and T-72B3M tanks, about 80 T-80BVM tanks and a batch of T-90M Proryv tanks are expected to arrive. On the "nineties" the Ministry of Defense does not give exact figures.

It is emphasized that all the equipment has confirmed the inherent characteristics and has proven itself in operation in various climatic zones.

As previously reported, the Ministry of Defense has decided on the supply of tanks to the military districts. Thus, T-80BVMs are being supplied and will mainly be supplied to the Far East and the North, where gas turbine engines have proved their indispensability. The T-90M Proryv will mainly go into service with the troops in the western and southern directions. The upgraded T-72B3 and T-72B3M will be supplied to all districts except the North.

At the same time, nothing has been reported about the supply of the latest tanks on the Armata combat platform, earlier the Ministry of Defense explained that this equipment will go serially to the troops from 2022. The T-14 Armata manufacturer announced preparations for the delivery of an experimental-industrial batch of tanks to the troops, but did not name the number of tanks in the batch.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Ross xnumx

+28

12 June 2021 18: 07

Let it be 200. Let the Armata T-14 begin to enter the troops in series in 2022 ... But let's talk more often about real deeds and real possibilities... Honestly, this splendor of the reports is simply sick of it.
1. Thrifty
  
  -7
  
  12 June 2021 19: 10
  
  Or maybe it's enough to take the "budget" T72B3, with almost no protection? Or, in the case of their militant application, our oligarchy will put them in these. ... how would the tanks of their "kids"? And the T14 will go into production by 2222 for sure, hopefully. ...
  1. lucul
    
    +8
    
    12 June 2021 20: 30
    
    Or maybe it's enough to take the "budget" T72B3, with almost no protection?
    
    Do you propose to keep the old T-72 first versions?
    Do you think it would be better? )))
  2. bayard
    
    +7
    
    12 June 2021 21: 39
    
    Quote: Thrifty
    Or maybe it's enough to take "budget" T72B3
    
    So they take less and less every year. But the T-80BVM is already 80 pieces. plan to receive, and his security is almost at the level of the T-90M.
    Quote: Thrifty
    And the T14 will go into production by 2222 for sure, hopefully. ...
    
    You can hope, you can count ... not worth it. Better more T-90M.
knn54

-11

12 June 2021 18: 17

-by the end of the year, the troops will receive about 200 tanks.
-the arrival of 90 modernized T-72B3 and T-72B3M tanks.
-about 80 T-80BVM tanks.
- For the "nineties" the Ministry of Defense does not give exact figures.
If only 170 (about 200) then the T-90 is about 1.
1. URAL72
  
  +14
  
  12 June 2021 18: 56
  
  The Ministry of Defense does not give exact figures for the "nineties"
  
  And what is there to guess? Hedgehog is clear - a battalion kit, - 31 vehicles.
  1. knn54
    
    +6
    
    12 June 2021 19: 05
    
    Does "Hedgehog" know that, for example, a tank battalion of a separate brigade of the Russian army has 42 tanks?
    And the 31st tank is in the tank battalion of the TANK regiment.
    1. URAL72
      
      +4
      
      12 June 2021 19: 10
      
      Which brigade do you mean? Tank? I personally judge by the motorized rifle DNR. Or is something missing again at the customs? I was told that luggage was stolen at the airport.
    2. SKVichyakow
      
      0
      
      14 June 2021 08: 43
      
      And how much is there in the tank battalion?
  2. Real Pilot
    
    +15
    
    12 June 2021 19: 16
    
    Modernization and rearmament are underway. Two hundred tanks a year is a good indicator. Let's name the countries that have more? Not sure if there are many
    
    After all, there were years when there were exactly 0 new tanks for the Russian army.
    1. sustav75
      
      +2
      
      13 June 2021 11: 05
      
      These are not new tanks! And taken from storage and brought into proper form.
    2. Volder
      
      +1
      
      15 June 2021 13: 42
      
      Quote: RealPilot
      Two hundred tanks a year is a good indicator.
      The production capacity of Uralvagonzavod allows the production of 500 tanks per year (including the modernization of old ones). It can be concluded that the Ministry of Defense saves money on tanks, giving priority to other equipment and areas.
2. t-12
  
  +1
  
  12 June 2021 18: 57
  
  It is very strange that the military uses the word "about". Don't they have an exact figure? Or is this figure secret?
3. voyaka uh
  
  +3
  
  12 June 2021 19: 38
  
  "receipt of 90 modernized T-72B3 and T-72B3M tanks.
  -about 80 T-80BVM tanks. "///
  ----
  Upgraded - are they new, from scratch?
  Or upgrades to tanks that have already been in the army or are being mothballed?
  1. Alf
    
    +11
    
    12 June 2021 20: 02
    
    Quote: voyaka uh
    Upgraded - are they new, from scratch?
    
    Of course, modernized. T-72, as it were, have not been produced for a long time, they are only being pulled up to B, B3, B3M. Like eighties.
    It seems to be written in Russian in white ...
  2. lucul
    
    -2
    
    12 June 2021 21: 07
    
    new, from scratch?
    
    How are things with you there with Pfizer?
    I read - that a bunch of side effects, even fatal, began to appear?
Adimius38

-3

12 June 2021 18: 18

it looks like we are very, very far from the armature, even if the T-90 breakthrough into the troops goes in large numbers and that is more useful than talking about armature
Lara Croft

+5

12 June 2021 18: 20

and a batch of T-90M Proryv tanks. On the "nineties" the Ministry of Defense does not give exact figures.

Here the article was about deliveries T-90M in the 20th and 19th MSD, I counted with another kind forum member 288 tanks... into two divisions ...
The Ministry of Defense will strengthen the southern direction with modernized T-90M "Proryv" tanks

https://topwar.ru/183663-minoborony-usilit-juzhnoe-napravlenie-modernizirovannymi-tankami-t-90m-proryv.html
article of 03.06.2021
bars1

-21

12 June 2021 18: 22

Yeah ... But Putin boasts of an annual reduction in spending on defense!
1. Oleg Aviator
  
  +2
  
  12 June 2021 19: 04
  
  Now the times are such that it is not worth it to waste time on defense. You will lose more.
2. Volder
  
  0
  
  15 June 2021 13: 46
  
  Quote: bars1
  But Putin is bragging about the annual reduction in spending on defense!
  Would it be better if Russia spent much more on defense, following the example of the United States?
DMi

0

12 June 2021 19: 35

Accordion. This news has already been, right there on this forum.
Mavrikiy

0

12 June 2021 19: 37

will receive about 200 tanks.
90 modernized T-72B3 and T-72B3M tanks, about 80 T-80BVM tanks and a batch of T-90M Proryv tanks. On the "nineties" the Ministry of Defense does not give exact figures.
Less than 30 pieces, in doubt?
Azimuth

+1

12 June 2021 20: 53

Quote: ROSS 42
Let it be 200. Let the Armata T-14 begin to enter the troops in series in 2022 ... But let's talk more often about real deeds and real possibilities... Honestly, this splendor of the reports is simply sick of it.

Do we need Armata now? ... The situation is not very good, the trained reserve knows the T-72, so its upgrades up to the T-90M are now more appropriate.
In my opinion, it is not up to the "Armat" now, it will be much more effective to upgrade and even more to strengthen due to the development of the T-72. Yes, and we can afford just that, parades - with parades, relays - with relations, but no matter how we had to fight.
So they mobilized us, and I saw BMP-3 more on TV, but with BMP-1, -2 anything and with my eyes closed, so for example I have no time for Kurganets.
1. cat Rusich
  
  +3
  
  12 June 2021 22: 43
  
  Quote: Azimuth
  
  Do we need Armata now? ... The situation is not very good, the trained reserve knows the T-72, so its upgrades up to the T-90M are now more appropriate.
  My opinion is not up to "Armat" now,.
  When is the time for the T-14 Armata?
  Now there is still "peacetime" - you can make military equipment "slowly", bring it to mind and figure out how to use it.
  We will not now train tankers on the T-14 - a trained reserve will not appear ...
  
  Quote: Azimuth
  but no matter how I had to fight.
  So they mobilized us, and I saw BMP-3 more on TV, but with BMP-1, -2 anything and with my eyes closed, so for example I have no time for Kurganets.
  How long will we "leave" on Soviet technology (produced in the USSR) ??
  And you Mitrich is not bothered by the weak armor of the BMP-1, -2, but like the BMP-1, -2 with observation and aiming devices ...
  Quote: Azimuth
  
  Do we need him now Armata? ....
  Do we need a T-34? ...
  Perhaps the same question was asked in the People's Commissariat of Defense in 1940g...
2. OgnennyiKotik
  
  -5
  
  13 June 2021 00: 11
  
  Quote: Azimuth
  Do we need him now Armata?
  
  The Ministry of Defense has already answered with these purchases. Not. If they had planned at least some large series, they would have stopped buying the T-90M. Recently, the development of an unmanned complex based on the T-72 has begun, although based on the Armata it is more logical. It looks like the stone flower did not come out.
  Armata will face the fate of a ceremonial tank before the change of the current government, the next one will simply write off this project as a mistake of its predecessors. And before the same T-90M, the Armata has no fundamental advantages, only the theoretical increased survivability of the crew.
  1. Ripap
    
    0
    
    14 June 2021 09: 51
    
    How is it not? There is another gun, and another AZ, which allows the use of longer crowbars. Unfortunately, tanks on the T-72 platform have already reached the modernization limit, and the armor penetration of kinetic ammunition for them cannot be increased in any way. And this does not allow them to hit modern Western tanks in a frontal projection.
    1. OgnennyiKotik
      
      -1
      
      14 June 2021 10: 38
      
      This issue has been resolved for the T-90M add. compartment in the stern of the tower.
      1. Ripap
        
        0
        
        14 June 2021 13: 32
        
        Well, who will load shells from this niche in a combat situation if there is no loader in our tanks? These are all half measures, we need a fundamentally new tank. Yes, and in the cramped space of the t90m tower, 800 mm blanks are not particularly suitable.
3. Reiter
  
  0
  
  13 June 2021 21: 39
  
  For the sake of better survival it is possible to memorize Kurganets-25 intensively in another month, if I had a choice, otherwise than to go into battle, I would be full for my studies. And what you know is a penny, well, you can fight on the T-34, everything is simple there, but only to fight for so long.
22 dmdc

+1

13 June 2021 07: 28

Quote: knn54
Does "Hedgehog" know that, for example, a tank battalion of a separate brigade of the Russian army has 42 tanks?
And the 31st tank is in the tank battalion of the TANK regiment.

How it was long ago and now is not true. The Marines, like motorized riflemen, used to have 42 tanks in battalions. And now they promise when re-forming only 31 from storage. Without any modernization and "paint" will have to ourselves.
1. whatis love
  
  +1
  
  13 June 2021 15: 19
  
  42 tanks? 4 companies of 10 each + a KB tank? And where does another tank come from? Or 3 companies of 13 each plus the same tank commander? And where then two tanks? Please enlighten
silver_roman

+2

13 June 2021 21: 14

why t72b3? De decided to upgrade them to t72b3m?
Esaul

0

14 June 2021 15: 24

Norms, we don't need too many tanks now. They are more or less effective only against backward countries, for example, if there is a conflict with the outskirts or Georgia. There are nuclear weapons against NATO.
Azimuth

0

16 June 2021 23: 13

Quote: cat Rusich
Quote: Azimuth

Do we need Armata now? ... The situation is not very good, the trained reserve knows the T-72, so its upgrades up to the T-90M are now more appropriate.
My opinion is not up to "Armat" now,.
When is the time for the T-14 Armata?
Now there is still "peacetime" - you can make military equipment "slowly", bring it to mind and figure out how to use it.
We will not now train tankers on the T-14 - a trained reserve will not appear ...

Quote: Azimuth
but no matter how I had to fight.
So they mobilized us, and I saw BMP-3 more on TV, but with BMP-1, -2 anything and with my eyes closed, so for example I have no time for Kurganets.
How long will we "leave" on Soviet technology (produced in the USSR) ??
And you Mitrich is not bothered by the weak armor of the BMP-1, -2, but like the BMP-1, -2 with observation and aiming devices ...
Quote: Azimuth

Do we need him now Armata? ....
Do we need a T-34? ...
Perhaps the same question was asked in the People's Commissariat of Defense in 1940g...

IMHO, now is not the time for Armata and it will not come soon.
We have a potential enemy, there are his tanks, which are essentially the same age as the T-72, the exception that does not affect anything is the French AMX-56 (Leclerc).
Their tanks went through a series of upgrades, ours too, what else is needed for parity? We still have thousands of T-72s of the latest Soviet modifications, there are still three tank factories, this is the same as all NATO countries put together - Germany, France, the United States. About British "tank building" - about the deceased, either good or nothing ...
We have many gaps in other areas, it is easier to modernize the T-72 and T-80U for the North, build new T-90Ms in a certain proportion to support tank building, and send funds to other areas.

I know about the weak armor of the BMP-1 and BMP-2. But my attitude to these vehicles is only as a more armed ... tracked armored personnel carrier. In principle, both in exercises and in actions, we proceeded from this. In the armies of a potential enemy, the number of heavy infantry fighting vehicles is not so high, plus they are already just as outdated to focus on this. In addition, the BMP-3 goes to the troops.