The frigate of the Black Sea Fleet "Admiral Grigorovich" repelled a missile strike from the coastal complexes "Bal" and "Utes"

80

In the waters of the Black Sea, exercises were held with the involvement of the frigate "Admiral Grigorovich" and two coastal complexes. During the exercise, the frigate repelled a missile attack by firing the Shtil anti-aircraft missile system. The press service of the Black Sea fleet.

According to the exercise scenario, the Bal mobile coastal missile system and the Utes stationary coastal complex launched a missile attack on the Admiral Grigorovich Black Sea Fleet frigate. In turn, the ship's crew was tasked with repelling the attack on the ship. The objectives of the exercise have been achieved, according to the headquarters of the Black Sea Fleet.



Thus, Bal and Utes launched Uran and Progress missiles at the ship, respectively. The frigate Admiral Grigorovich detected air targets, took them for escort, and then hit them with the Shtil anti-aircraft missile system.


It is noted that the exercises were conducted in several stages, during which more than 10 missile launches were made from the ship and ground complexes. The exercise area was closed to navigation in advance.

It should be noted that such exercises are not the first for the frigate's crew, and for the Utes DBK, too. Last year, the coastal complex already launched the Progress missile at the Admiral Grigorovich, it was safely intercepted by the Shtil anti-aircraft complex. This year Bal has been added to the Cliff with its Uranus rocket.

"Admiral Grigorovich" is the lead frigate of the sea zone in a series of three ships of Project 11356, built for the Black Sea Fleet. Transferred to the Russian Navy on March 11, 2016. It has a displacement of about 4 thousand tons, a speed of 30 knots, and an autonomy of sailing for 30 days. The frigate is armed with Kalibr-NK cruise missiles, the Shtil-1 self-defense missile system, an A-190 gun mount of 100 mm caliber, anti-aircraft artillery, a rocket launcher, torpedoes, and can be carried by a Ka-27 (or Ka-31) deck helicopter. Crew - 180 people (including 18 officers).
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    80 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +12
      26 May 2021
      "Grigorovich" is being exploited to the maximum. He probably has the most professionally prepared crew!
      1. +2
        26 May 2021
        The main thing is that the exercises are carried out much more often and with the involvement of different types of troops) so that they are ready for battle, and not toil about the foolishness at the bases)) in order to "save" funds)
        1. -8
          26 May 2021
          After the tragedy in Kazan, a certain General Zolotov openly stated that the soldiers were given little fire training, once they would shoot another, and that was all ... The commander of the Russian Guard signed that he did not teach fighters and was dragging out his term only by supporting the infrastructure of the army, and not learning combat skills ....... angry
          1. +5
            26 May 2021
            it's sad (I'm talking about the guards) of course, but the tragedy in Kazan cannot be prevented or eliminated by shooting and training fighters)
            here the main proser is teaching and educational work in school and outside it) if a child is not brought up from childhood, the vacuum in the head will be filled at best by authoritative guys from the street, and the presence of the Internet and useful idiots there multiplies the situation at times) I say not by hearsay, he himself faced with the eldest son with the problem of death groups, where adolescents enter for the sake of curiosity, and then, if they leave there, they are poisoned on all fronts with the help of hundreds (again, hundreds, not dozens) "useful idiots" who do not even suspect what they are doing)
            and this despite the fact that he studied perfectly at school, was not a nerd at the same time, and in sports he was even the captain of his team)
            1. +3
              26 May 2021
              In general, I will support you. It all starts in the family. My youngest was busy with sports, knows who won the Battle of Kursk, does not drink / does not smoke / and does not pull, has categories B, C and has served for half a year - he refused to mow on principle.
            2. +3
              27 May 2021
              In the meantime, Rosobrnadzor canceled the USE in mathematics ... Than signed that the majority of schools in mathematics could not implement the curriculum. With reference to the investigation, there was information that the "good boy" from Kazan had a conflict with the teacher, who forced him to pick up the documents after the 9th. I think that it is not a secret for anyone that the management of many (almost all) schools gives parents an ultimatum: "We will help you with the OGE, and you will take your documents." So where is the main miscalculation ??
              Sincerely
          2. +1
            26 May 2021
            The conversation was about conscripts, of whom there are not many in the National Guard. The same operational units or special forces shoot quite a lot
            1. -3
              26 May 2021
              Conscripts why are called up to the army?
          3. 0
            27 May 2021
            soldiers are given little fire training

            I do not know why this is so. In the police, for example, they shoot from the "belly", twice a month, but several times each.
          4. The comment was deleted.
    2. +25
      26 May 2021
      You don't even know if it is good or bad when your anti-ship missile defense hit your anti-ship missile system ... It seems like you are happy for your anti-ship missile defense, but then you get upset about anti-ship missiles. Who to root for in such a situation?
      1. +3
        26 May 2021
        No need to get sick .. at all !! Everything on this planet is ours ..
        When the aliens arrive, then we'll break our heads ..))
        1. +3
          27 May 2021
          They are already here)
      2. +5
        26 May 2021
        Well, Progress and Uranus are old rockets. It is not surprising that they work well. But we must also take into account the fact that the crew was ready and it is known where it will fly from.
        1. -3
          26 May 2021
          On the other hand, among the bourgeoisie, it seems, the majority of the RCCs are not young either .. Although, of course, one cannot relax.
        2. +6
          26 May 2021
          And the enemies of course will not know from Bulgaria or the Crimea, our anti-ship missiles wait?
        3. +4
          26 May 2021
          Quote: 210ox
          Well, Progress and Uranus are old rockets. It is not surprising that they work well. But we must also take into account the fact that the crew was ready and it is known where it will fly from.

          And most likely both "Progress" and "Uranus" flew not en masse, but one at a time. A single target is easier to brush off.
      3. -24
        26 May 2021
        This is our air defense, the striped and the half-witted have none. And if we know how to "hit" our own anti-ship missile system, then we will muffle them even more ...
        1. +13
          26 May 2021
          groins, of course not, the striped ones are generally so stupid and backward, the main thing is to believe in it)))
          1. -13
            26 May 2021
            You have to believe in victory ...
            1. +5
              26 May 2021
              Quote: isv000
              You have to believe in victory ...

              You can believe even in Cthulhu, and victory is won - by will, perseverance, courage, dedication and intelligence. fool
              1. -1
                26 May 2021
                Better in Kuthu fool
              2. -1
                27 May 2021
                You can even believe in Cthulhu,

                You can't, you only go to Jehovah ...
                1. +1
                  28 May 2021
                  Quote: bk316
                  You are not allowed

                  Who will stop me? bully
                  1. 0
                    28 May 2021
                    Who will stop me?

                    Nationality.
                    Is Israel in general a national or religious state?
                    1. 0
                      28 May 2021
                      Quote: bk316
                      Nationality.

                      With what fright? Didn't interfere for almost half a century, and suddenly it starts? wassat

                      Quote: bk316
                      Is Israel in general a national or religious state?

                      Democratic.
        2. +4
          26 May 2021
          Yeah, and they showered them with hats. You have to be like that. Unwise ..
      4. +7
        26 May 2021
        Quote: paul3390
        upset about the RCC

        Everything is fine. A modern well-bred frigate should be able to shrug off a single Uranus.
      5. 0
        26 May 2021
        By the way, yes, I also had such a thought))
      6. +7
        26 May 2021
        Quote: paul3390
        You don't even know if it is good or bad when your anti-ship missile defense hit your anti-ship missile system ... It seems like you are happy for your anti-ship missile defense, but then you get upset about anti-ship missiles. Who to root for in such a situation?

        Here I am about the same. If our naval air defense personnel were able to shoot down the anti-ship missiles "Bal" and "Bastion" (if it was not a giveaway game), then where is the confidence that the adversaries cannot do the same? Hence the conclusion - hopes for the "Ball" and "Bastion", which are in the Crimea, in the Far East and the Kuril Islands, are small. It's time to scratch the back of the head for the Machine Building Design Bureau.
        1. +2
          26 May 2021
          Quote: Krasnoyarsk
          Hence the conclusion - hopes for "Ball" and "Bastion"in the Crimea, in the Far East and the Kuril Islands, are small. It's time to scratch the back of the head for the Machine Building Design Bureau.

          For some, enough. It never occurred to anyone to hit "Grigorovich" with "hypersound".
        2. 0
          27 May 2021
          Hence the conclusion - hopes for the "Ball" and "Bastion", which are in the Crimea, in the Far East and the Kuril Islands, are small.

          You have the wrong conclusion, dilettante. No one will fire single subsonic missiles, as well as single missiles with a medium-altitude profile ...
          1. +1
            28 May 2021
            Quote: bk316

            You have the wrong conclusion, dilettante. No one will fire single subsonic missiles, as well as single missiles with a medium-altitude profile ...

            I agree with you. So the testing of the frigate's air defense was aimed at studying the maximum air defense capabilities?
            1. 0
              31 May 2021
              So the testing of the frigate's air defense was for the purpose of studying the maximum air defense capabilities?

              Well, not that maximum. The maximum values ​​are specified in the performance characteristics. Rather, the study of the correspondence of real and declared possibilities. For a single medium-altitude subsonic target is nothing at all, so to check whether the crew forgot which buttons to press.
        3. 0
          27 May 2021
          If our naval air defense personnel were able to shoot down anti-ship missiles "Bal" and "Bastion"

          Nobody fired at the bastion. Read carefully). There "Ball" and "Cliff".
          1. 0
            28 May 2021
            Quote: Stepan S

            Nobody fired at the bastion. Read carefully). There "Ball" and "Cliff".

            Thanks for the amendment. hi
      7. +3
        26 May 2021
        Single launches. A frigate for a couple of anti-ship missiles is a difficult target. There will be more missiles in a volley when they hit to kill. By the way, such exercises help out how many missiles should be in a salvo to overload the ship's air defense
      8. +1
        26 May 2021
        Quote: paul3390
        You don't even know if it is good or bad when your anti-ship missile defense hit your anti-ship missile system ... It seems like you are happy for your anti-ship missile defense, but then you get upset about anti-ship missiles. Who to root for in such a situation?

        This is normal practice. For example, ATGMs are used to test MANPADS at landfills.
        1. +1
          27 May 2021
          For example, for testing MANPADS at test sites, ATGMs are used

          In the navy, we fired from MANPADS at rockets from the Grad. Efficiency 100%
      9. +2
        26 May 2021
        Quote: paul3390
        You don't even know if it is good or bad when your anti-ship missile defense hit your anti-ship missile system ... It seems like you are happy for your anti-ship missile defense, but then you get upset about anti-ship missiles. Who to root for in such a situation?

        It is absolutely rightly noticed.
        If this frigate defended itself from these anti-ship missiles, it means that a similar enemy frigate will also be able to defend itself (and inflict a counterstrike), therefore, such anti-ship missiles are worthless. request
        Or, it can be assumed that the onshore installations played "giveaway", then the price for these interceptions, since the enemy will not play giveaway. request
      10. 0
        28 May 2021
        And further. If ours easily shot down our missile, will the enemies shoot down with the same ease?
    3. +6
      26 May 2021
      The frigate Admiral Grigorovich detected air targets, took them for escort, and then hit them with the Shtil anti-aircraft missile system.

      I did not see the defeat of the targets.
      1. -1
        27 May 2021
        I did not see the defeat of the targets.

        Apparently, it is difficult to organize video filming in the affected area. This is not shooting at a shield target.
    4. -3
      26 May 2021
      That is, "Ball" and "Cliff" are not being finalized ..))
      1. 0
        26 May 2021
        I also did not understand. Our technique is on both sides. It turns out that our technique has lost. So she's bad. So what is the victory here? request
        1. +11
          26 May 2021
          So what is the victory here?

          The victory here is that the air defense was tested ..
          In the next. once they will test the coastal complexes .. I have no doubt that they will also win ..))
          1. 0
            26 May 2021
            Those. then the boat will lose? I don't really believe in a future article about the fact that our "Admiral" was "sunk" ... soldier
            1. 0
              26 May 2021
              Well, the ship did not equalize the coastal complexes this time either ..))
    5. +9
      26 May 2021
      A question arose from me,
      if a single frigate successfully repels missile strikes of the Coastal anti-ship missile complex, then:
      1. What is the advisability of having such "toothless" complexes for service?
      2. If the complexes are not "toothless" in fact, but really good, then why do "exercises" in greenhouse conditions?

      Greenhouse teachings teach nothing.
      Money, hundreds of millions of rubles will not benefit anyone.
      Neither the fleet nor the state.

      Toothless complexes do not destroy anything.
      What is the use of them?

      These are the photos that should be from the exercises :)))
      1. +8
        26 May 2021
        From the exercises of the times of the USSR on repelling the anti-ship missile system, there is a photo and more sad.
      2. -2
        26 May 2021
        And why then, the vaunted Aegis did not work? Or again, our sweet couple took part? wassat
      3. mvg
        -5
        26 May 2021
        I read the first normal comment today. +
      4. -2
        26 May 2021
        Quote: SovAr238A
        These are the photos that should be from the exercises :)))

        Or these videos.
        One of the training targets of the Tomahawk was a decommissioned container ship. The missile was launched at a moving target from the destroyer USS Kidd. The shooting took place from different angles, the most spectacular, of course, is the segment shot directly from the bow of the container ship.


        And the work of antimissiles is shown like this:
        1. +3
          26 May 2021
          Privalov-and where is the video of your downed UAV, your own iron dome? Or, "is this a different case"? ??
          1. +3
            26 May 2021
            Quote: Thrifty
            Privalov-and where is the video of your downed UAV, your own iron dome? Or, "is this a different case"? ??

            This is an extraordinary case. I won't tell you about the video, but I will wait for the results of the investigation. Has already given instructions. They promised me not to delay for a long time. hi
        2. +1
          26 May 2021
          The videos are interesting. And it was not without the "comment" that the seagulls survived)
        3. -1
          27 May 2021
          And what is so surprising about these videos? Entertainment? So Hollywood lovers need it. Getting into a container ship is not a great victory. And the Iron Dome is also not a problem to intercept targets flying at speeds up to 200 km / h. Show, there is a show.
        4. -1
          28 May 2021
          So what, did you do a lot of damage? Not even the birds were hurt.
      5. +4
        26 May 2021
        Quote: SovAr238A
        if a single frigate successfully repels missile strikes of the Coastal anti-ship missile complex

        Judging by the news, they fired at the frigate with one rocket: just check the ability of its air defense system to capture and shoot down a low-flying target. On a real target, the "Ball" would hit with a salvo of several missiles, so much so that they would also come up simultaneously from different sides. And the real goal wouldn't be so much fun anymore.

        Quote: SovAr238A
        These are the photos that should be from the exercises :)))

        And such photos speak of the air defense curve and poor tuning of the target missile (it should have self-destructed before colliding with the ship).
      6. +3
        26 May 2021
        Quote: SovAr238A
        if a single frigate successfully repels missile strikes of the Coastal anti-ship missile complex, then:
        1. What is the advisability of having such "toothless" complexes for service?

        Norm :))) The frigate repelled the attack of a single anti-ship missile, and in case of war - there will be salvo launches
        Quote: SovAr238A
        if the complexes are not "toothless" in fact, but really good, then why do "exercises" in greenhouse conditions?

        There is no money for salvo training launches :)))))
        In principle, very few people have practiced them, such exercises. We had, in the USSR, it happened sometimes when EMNIP 2 ships brought down 7 anti-ship missiles from different heights and angles, but this is also irregular.
      7. +4
        26 May 2021
        strictly speaking, these were not teachings.
        We drove the target back and forth to align the radar after modernization, and lost control over it. Either an industrial accident, or someone's negligence.
        :)
        1. 0
          27 May 2021
          Excuse me, how do you imagine the alignment of a digital radar? Why use an anti-ship missile system for this, and how can Progress be driven back and forth? Isn't it easier to use an airplane for this?
          Sincerely
          1. +1
            27 May 2021
            they had a software update and then tested it to work.
            A malfunction occurred in the control system of the target drone used for the test.
            this is a famous story

            During the latter half of 2012, Chancellorsville underwent equipment upgrades as part of the Aegis Modernization effort ACB-12. In January 2013, the ship spent five days [9] under way off the coast of California to perform a series of tests of the updated ACB-12 equipment and software.

            In November 2013, while testing combat weapons systems off the coast of Point Mugu, California, a BQM-74E unmanned drone being used in the exercise failed to respond to commands to turn away from the ship and collided with Chancellorsville. Since it was a tracking exercise and not a live fire exercise, the crew did not engage the drone with the Phalanx CIWS. [10]


            In the second half of 2012, Chancellorsville underwent an equipment upgrade as part of the Aegis ACB-12 Retrofit Project. In January 2013, the ship spent five days [9] en route off the coast of California to perform a series of tests on updated ACB-12 hardware and software.

            In November 2013, during testing of weapons systems off the coast of Point Mugu, California, the BQM-74E unmanned drone used in the exercise did not respond to the command to turn away from the ship and collided with Chancellorsville. Since this was a tracking exercise and not a live-fire exercise, the crew did not deploy the drone with the Phalanx CIWS. [10]

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Chancellorsville
            sorry, the translation is clumsy machine, but clear enough
            the official report of the event in details, if you are interested, you can see here
            https://news.usni.org/2014/06/27/document-investigation-uss-chancellorsville-drone-strike
            On the Internet there is a fake invented by someone about this case that Aegis allegedly missed a rocket.
            hi
            1. 0
              27 May 2021
              Sorry, but the quote you quoted is not politically correct, since the name of the ship glorifies southerners - slave owners !!! White Suprematists consider the battle after which the ship is named as General Lee's greatest victory. Therefore, the main problem of the exercise is not a drone crash or Aegis curve, but the name of the ship! "What do you call a yacht ..."
              Sincerely
              1. -1
                27 May 2021
                No, well, that explains everything.
                Another thing
                You can assume that I wrote a post, just in case, on my knees, as befits a white perpetrator of slavery.
                feel
                1. +1
                  27 May 2021
                  You are right, the translation is really crooked ... The target drone showed Gender Fluidity by refusing to participate in the exercises under the confederation flag and came out!
                  Sincerely
      8. +4
        26 May 2021
        The complexes gave only one missile each. A full volley will not seem like a little.
      9. 0
        26 May 2021
        Quote: SovAr238A
        Greenhouse teachings teach nothing.

        That's for sure. We must not shoot at targets, but put “live targets with a lifelong” ... belay
        The characteristics of Russian anti-ship missiles are comparable to foreign counterparts. Torment yourself to a frenzy in peacetime? Although, why not try the domestic "Dagger" or "Onyx" on your own ship?
    6. 0
      26 May 2021
      That's how much money they launched into the sky! (Sarcasm) It is hard in training, easy in battle. It is necessary that each crew be so "fired at." cows below! good
      1. +4
        26 May 2021
        the Americans tested their missile defense ... and got a missile on board! lol
      2. +2
        26 May 2021
        There is not much money actually. This complex was completed with the money of the Chinese, and this rocket was also made with the money of the Chinese. For the Indians and the beam was the norm. As a result, the Chinese have already had a third dozen frigates with 32 Shtil-1 UVPs and the Navy was able to order a normal complex (though only 24 missiles), and not a beam, moreover, even the Indians received a normal complex on the third contract, and not a beam without additional spending wink .
    7. The comment was deleted.
      1. +1
        26 May 2021
        Quote: Experienced_
        But if they fired "Caliber" ohm - it would be funnier and the frigate would be checked at maximum speed)))


        What kind of miracle caliber is it for you? Just a wunderwaffe?
        For the target ship, the Caliber anti-ship missile system flying at it is not much different from the Uranus anti-ship missile system ...
    8. 0
      26 May 2021
      Quote: paul3390
      You don’t even know if it’s good or bad when your air defense system hit your own anti-ship missile system ...

      Shield and sword, which is stronger.
      1. 0
        26 May 2021
        Stronger is he who has a sharp sword and a strong shield.
    9. 0
      26 May 2021
      Someone does not finish. Or the launches of anti-ship missiles were conditional or against some kind of target, but in no way against a warship with a crew, there is too much risk, suddenly anti-ship missiles would have broken through and the self-destruction system would not have worked.
    10. -1
      26 May 2021
      How to know, how to know, and what is prepared for partners? They are their own.
    11. 0
      26 May 2021
      Calm? But what about Redoubt?
    12. -1
      26 May 2021
      Well done, they checked the electronic warfare, etc. Now the Anglo-Saxons need to hone their skills ..
      And then the zaslanets got into the habit of running around in OUR World Cup
    13. 0
      26 May 2021
      On the one hand, this is good. But on the other hand, this is very bad.
    14. +1
      27 May 2021
      Either the frigate is good, or the complexes are bad ...
    15. kig
      +2
      28 May 2021
      Well, again, the missiles flew beautifully from the launcher and rushed off somewhere into the distance. Where are the hits?

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"