The frigate of the Black Sea Fleet "Admiral Grigorovich" repelled a missile strike from the coastal complexes "Bal" and "Utes"

In the waters of the Black Sea, exercises were held with the involvement of the frigate "Admiral Grigorovich" and two coastal complexes. During the exercise, the frigate repelled a missile attack by firing the Shtil anti-aircraft missile system. The press service of the Black Sea fleet.

According to the exercise scenario, the Bal mobile coastal missile system and the Utes stationary coastal complex launched a missile attack on the Admiral Grigorovich Black Sea Fleet frigate. In turn, the ship's crew was tasked with repelling the attack on the ship. The objectives of the exercise have been achieved, according to the headquarters of the Black Sea Fleet.

Thus, Bal and Utes launched Uran and Progress missiles at the ship, respectively. The frigate Admiral Grigorovich detected air targets, took them for escort, and then hit them with the Shtil anti-aircraft missile system.

It is noted that the exercises were conducted in several stages, during which more than 10 missile launches were made from the ship and ground complexes. The exercise area was closed to navigation in advance.

It should be noted that such exercises are not the first for the frigate's crew, and for the Utes DBK, too. Last year, the coastal complex already launched the Progress missile at the Admiral Grigorovich, it was safely intercepted by the Shtil anti-aircraft complex. This year Bal has been added to the Cliff with its Uranus rocket.

"Admiral Grigorovich" is the lead frigate of the sea zone in a series of three ships of Project 11356, built for the Black Sea Fleet. Transferred to the Russian Navy on March 11, 2016. It has a displacement of about 4 thousand tons, a speed of 30 knots, and an autonomy of sailing for 30 days. The frigate is armed with Kalibr-NK cruise missiles, the Shtil-1 self-defense missile system, an A-190 gun mount of 100 mm caliber, anti-aircraft artillery, a rocket launcher, torpedoes, and can be carried by a Ka-27 (or Ka-31) deck helicopter. Crew - 180 people (including 18 officers).

Comments

[Thrifty]

"Grigorovich" is being exploited to the maximum. He probably has the most professionally prepared crew!

[Anachoret]

The main thing is that the exercises are carried out much more often and with the involvement of different types of troops) so that they are ready for battle, and not toil about the foolishness at the bases)) in order to "save" funds)

[isv000]

After the tragedy in Kazan, a certain General Zolotov openly stated that the soldiers were given little fire training, once they would shoot another, and that was all ... The commander of the Russian Guard signed that he did not teach fighters and was dragging out his term only by supporting the infrastructure of the army, and not learning combat skills .......

[Anachoret]

it's sad (I'm talking about the guards) of course, but the tragedy in Kazan cannot be prevented or eliminated by shooting and training fighters)
here the main proser is teaching and educational work in school and outside it) if a child is not brought up from childhood, the vacuum in the head will be filled at best by authoritative guys from the street, and the presence of the Internet and useful idiots there multiplies the situation at times) I say not by hearsay, he himself faced with the eldest son with the problem of death groups, where adolescents enter for the sake of curiosity, and then, if they leave there, they are poisoned on all fronts with the help of hundreds (again, hundreds, not dozens) "useful idiots" who do not even suspect what they are doing)
and this despite the fact that he studied perfectly at school, was not a nerd at the same time, and in sports he was even the captain of his team)

[isv000]

In general, I will support you. It all starts in the family. My youngest was busy with sports, knows who won the Battle of Kursk, does not drink / does not smoke / and does not pull, has categories B, C and has served for half a year - he refused to mow on principle.

[nobody75]

In the meantime, Rosobrnadzor canceled the USE in mathematics ... Than signed that the majority of schools in mathematics could not implement the curriculum. With reference to the investigation, there was information that the "good boy" from Kazan had a conflict with the teacher, who forced him to pick up the documents after the 9th. I think that it is not a secret for anyone that the management of many (almost all) schools gives parents an ultimatum: "We will help you with the OGE, and you will take your documents." So where is the main miscalculation ??
Sincerely

[koramax81]

The conversation was about conscripts, of whom there are not many in the National Guard. The same operational units or special forces shoot quite a lot

[isv000]

Conscripts why are called up to the army?

[Stepan S]

soldiers are given little fire training

I do not know why this is so. In the police, for example, they shoot from the "belly", twice a month, but several times each.

[paul3390]

You don't even know if it is good or bad when your anti-ship missile defense hit your anti-ship missile system ... It seems like you are happy for your anti-ship missile defense, but then you get upset about anti-ship missiles. Who to root for in such a situation?

[Roman070280]

No need to get sick .. at all !! Everything on this planet is ours ..
When the aliens arrive, then we'll break our heads ..))

[Alien From]

They are already here)

[210ox]

Well, Progress and Uranus are old rockets. It is not surprising that they work well. But we must also take into account the fact that the crew was ready and it is known where it will fly from.

[paul3390]

On the other hand, among the bourgeoisie, it seems, the majority of the RCCs are not young either .. Although, of course, one cannot relax.

[Blackmokona]

And the enemies of course will not know from Bulgaria or the Crimea, our anti-ship missiles wait?

[Piramidon]

Quote: 210ox

Well, Progress and Uranus are old rockets. It is not surprising that they work well. But we must also take into account the fact that the crew was ready and it is known where it will fly from.

And most likely both "Progress" and "Uranus" flew not en masse, but one at a time. A single target is easier to brush off.

[isv000]

This is our air defense, the striped and the half-witted have none. And if we know how to "hit" our own anti-ship missile system, then we will muffle them even more ...

[Rageee]

groins, of course not, the striped ones are generally so stupid and backward, the main thing is to believe in it)))

[isv000]

You have to believe in victory ...

[And Us Rat]

Quote: isv000

You have to believe in victory ...

You can believe even in Cthulhu, and victory is won - by will, perseverance, courage, dedication and intelligence.

[isv000]

Better in Kuthu

[bk316]

You can even believe in Cthulhu,

You can't, you only go to Jehovah ...

[And Us Rat]

Quote: bk316

You are not allowed

Who will stop me?

[bk316]

Who will stop me?

Nationality.
Is Israel in general a national or religious state?

[And Us Rat]

Quote: bk316

Nationality.

With what fright? Didn't interfere for almost half a century, and suddenly it starts?

Quote: bk316

Is Israel in general a national or religious state?

Democratic.

[210ox]

Yeah, and they showered them with hats. You have to be like that. Unwise ..

[Kalmar]

Quote: paul3390

upset about the RCC

Everything is fine. A modern well-bred frigate should be able to shrug off a single Uranus.

[Torins]

By the way, yes, I also had such a thought))

[Krasnoyarsk]

Quote: paul3390

You don't even know if it is good or bad when your anti-ship missile defense hit your anti-ship missile system ... It seems like you are happy for your anti-ship missile defense, but then you get upset about anti-ship missiles. Who to root for in such a situation?

Here I am about the same. If our naval air defense personnel were able to shoot down the anti-ship missiles "Bal" and "Bastion" (if it was not a giveaway game), then where is the confidence that the adversaries cannot do the same? Hence the conclusion - hopes for the "Ball" and "Bastion", which are in the Crimea, in the Far East and the Kuril Islands, are small. It's time to scratch the back of the head for the Machine Building Design Bureau.

[Ross xnumx]

Quote: Krasnoyarsk

Hence the conclusion - hopes for "Ball" and "Bastion"in the Crimea, in the Far East and the Kuril Islands, are small. It's time to scratch the back of the head for the Machine Building Design Bureau.

For some, enough. It never occurred to anyone to hit "Grigorovich" with "hypersound".

[bk316]

Hence the conclusion - hopes for the "Ball" and "Bastion", which are in the Crimea, in the Far East and the Kuril Islands, are small.

You have the wrong conclusion, dilettante. No one will fire single subsonic missiles, as well as single missiles with a medium-altitude profile ...

[Krasnoyarsk]

Quote: bk316

You have the wrong conclusion, dilettante. No one will fire single subsonic missiles, as well as single missiles with a medium-altitude profile ...

I agree with you. So the testing of the frigate's air defense was aimed at studying the maximum air defense capabilities?

[bk316]

So the testing of the frigate's air defense was for the purpose of studying the maximum air defense capabilities?

Well, not that maximum. The maximum values ​​are specified in the performance characteristics. Rather, the study of the correspondence of real and declared possibilities. For a single medium-altitude subsonic target is nothing at all, so to check whether the crew forgot which buttons to press.

[Stepan S]

If our naval air defense personnel were able to shoot down anti-ship missiles "Bal" and "Bastion"

Nobody fired at the bastion. Read carefully). There "Ball" and "Cliff".

[Krasnoyarsk]

Quote: Stepan S

Nobody fired at the bastion. Read carefully). There "Ball" and "Cliff".

Thanks for the amendment.

[garri-lin]

Single launches. A frigate for a couple of anti-ship missiles is a difficult target. There will be more missiles in a volley when they hit to kill. By the way, such exercises help out how many missiles should be in a salvo to overload the ship's air defense

[abc_alex]

Quote: paul3390

You don't even know if it is good or bad when your anti-ship missile defense hit your anti-ship missile system ... It seems like you are happy for your anti-ship missile defense, but then you get upset about anti-ship missiles. Who to root for in such a situation?

This is normal practice. For example, ATGMs are used to test MANPADS at landfills.

[Stepan S]

For example, for testing MANPADS at test sites, ATGMs are used

In the navy, we fired from MANPADS at rockets from the Grad. Efficiency 100%

[And Us Rat]

Quote: paul3390

You don't even know if it is good or bad when your anti-ship missile defense hit your anti-ship missile system ... It seems like you are happy for your anti-ship missile defense, but then you get upset about anti-ship missiles. Who to root for in such a situation?

It is absolutely rightly noticed.
If this frigate defended itself from these anti-ship missiles, it means that a similar enemy frigate will also be able to defend itself (and inflict a counterstrike), therefore, such anti-ship missiles are worthless.
Or, it can be assumed that the onshore installations played "giveaway", then the price for these interceptions, since the enemy will not play giveaway.

[Grif]

And further. If ours easily shot down our missile, will the enemies shoot down with the same ease?

[kventinasd]

The frigate Admiral Grigorovich detected air targets, took them for escort, and then hit them with the Shtil anti-aircraft missile system.

I did not see the defeat of the targets.

[Stepan S]

I did not see the defeat of the targets.

Apparently, it is difficult to organize video filming in the affected area. This is not shooting at a shield target.

[Roman070280]

That is, "Ball" and "Cliff" are not being finalized ..))

[Cat Alexandrovich]

I also did not understand. Our technique is on both sides. It turns out that our technique has lost. So she's bad. So what is the victory here?

[Roman070280]

So what is the victory here?

The victory here is that the air defense was tested ..
In the next. once they will test the coastal complexes .. I have no doubt that they will also win ..))

[Cat Alexandrovich]

Those. then the boat will lose? I don't really believe in a future article about the fact that our "Admiral" was "sunk" ...

[Roman070280]

Well, the ship did not equalize the coastal complexes this time either ..))

[SovAr238A]

A question arose from me,
if a single frigate successfully repels missile strikes of the Coastal anti-ship missile complex, then:
1. What is the advisability of having such "toothless" complexes for service?
2. If the complexes are not "toothless" in fact, but really good, then why do "exercises" in greenhouse conditions?

Greenhouse teachings teach nothing.
Money, hundreds of millions of rubles will not benefit anyone.
Neither the fleet nor the state.

Toothless complexes do not destroy anything.
What is the use of them?

These are the photos that should be from the exercises :)))

[Fregate]

From the exercises of the times of the USSR on repelling the anti-ship missile system, there is a photo and more sad.

[tralflot1832]

And why then, the vaunted Aegis did not work? Or again, our sweet couple took part?

[mvg]

I read the first normal comment today. +

[A. Privalov]

Quote: SovAr238A

These are the photos that should be from the exercises :)))

Or these videos.
One of the training targets of the Tomahawk was a decommissioned container ship. The missile was launched at a moving target from the destroyer USS Kidd. The shooting took place from different angles, the most spectacular, of course, is the segment shot directly from the bow of the container ship.


And the work of antimissiles is shown like this:

[Thrifty]

Privalov-and where is the video of your downed UAV, your own iron dome? Or, "is this a different case"? ??

[A. Privalov]

Quote: Thrifty

Privalov-and where is the video of your downed UAV, your own iron dome? Or, "is this a different case"? ??

This is an extraordinary case. I won't tell you about the video, but I will wait for the results of the investigation. Has already given instructions. They promised me not to delay for a long time.

[Alex013]

The videos are interesting. And it was not without the "comment" that the seagulls survived)

[Stepan S]

And what is so surprising about these videos? Entertainment? So Hollywood lovers need it. Getting into a container ship is not a great victory. And the Iron Dome is also not a problem to intercept targets flying at speeds up to 200 km / h. Show, there is a show.

[Grif]

So what, did you do a lot of damage? Not even the birds were hurt.

[Kalmar]

Quote: SovAr238A

if a single frigate successfully repels missile strikes of the Coastal anti-ship missile complex

Judging by the news, they fired at the frigate with one rocket: just check the ability of its air defense system to capture and shoot down a low-flying target. On a real target, the "Ball" would hit with a salvo of several missiles, so much so that they would also come up simultaneously from different sides. And the real goal wouldn't be so much fun anymore.

Quote: SovAr238A

These are the photos that should be from the exercises :)))

And such photos speak of the air defense curve and poor tuning of the target missile (it should have self-destructed before colliding with the ship).

[Andrei from Chelyabinsk]

Quote: SovAr238A

if a single frigate successfully repels missile strikes of the Coastal anti-ship missile complex, then:
1. What is the advisability of having such "toothless" complexes for service?

Norm :))) The frigate repelled the attack of a single anti-ship missile, and in case of war - there will be salvo launches

Quote: SovAr238A

if the complexes are not "toothless" in fact, but really good, then why do "exercises" in greenhouse conditions?

There is no money for salvo training launches :)))))
In principle, very few people have practiced them, such exercises. We had, in the USSR, it happened sometimes when EMNIP 2 ships brought down 7 anti-ship missiles from different heights and angles, but this is also irregular.

[Avior]

strictly speaking, these were not teachings.
We drove the target back and forth to align the radar after modernization, and lost control over it. Either an industrial accident, or someone's negligence.
:)

[nobody75]

Excuse me, how do you imagine the alignment of a digital radar? Why use an anti-ship missile system for this, and how can Progress be driven back and forth? Isn't it easier to use an airplane for this?
Sincerely

[Avior]

they had a software update and then tested it to work.
A malfunction occurred in the control system of the target drone used for the test.
this is a famous story

During the latter half of 2012, Chancellorsville underwent equipment upgrades as part of the Aegis Modernization effort ACB-12. In January 2013, the ship spent five days [9] under way off the coast of California to perform a series of tests of the updated ACB-12 equipment and software.

In November 2013, while testing combat weapons systems off the coast of Point Mugu, California, a BQM-74E unmanned drone being used in the exercise failed to respond to commands to turn away from the ship and collided with Chancellorsville. Since it was a tracking exercise and not a live fire exercise, the crew did not engage the drone with the Phalanx CIWS. [10]


In the second half of 2012, Chancellorsville underwent an equipment upgrade as part of the Aegis ACB-12 Retrofit Project. In January 2013, the ship spent five days [9] en route off the coast of California to perform a series of tests on updated ACB-12 hardware and software.

In November 2013, during testing of weapons systems off the coast of Point Mugu, California, the BQM-74E unmanned drone used in the exercise did not respond to the command to turn away from the ship and collided with Chancellorsville. Since this was a tracking exercise and not a live-fire exercise, the crew did not deploy the drone with the Phalanx CIWS. [10]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Chancellorsville
sorry, the translation is clumsy machine, but clear enough
the official report of the event in details, if you are interested, you can see here
https://news.usni.org/2014/06/27/document-investigation-uss-chancellorsville-drone-strike
On the Internet there is a fake invented by someone about this case that Aegis allegedly missed a rocket.

[nobody75]

Sorry, but the quote you quoted is not politically correct, since the name of the ship glorifies southerners - slave owners !!! White Suprematists consider the battle after which the ship is named as General Lee's greatest victory. Therefore, the main problem of the exercise is not a drone crash or Aegis curve, but the name of the ship! "What do you call a yacht ..."
Sincerely

[Avior]

No, well, that explains everything.
Another thing
You can assume that I wrote a post, just in case, on my knees, as befits a white perpetrator of slavery.

[nobody75]

You are right, the translation is really crooked ... The target drone showed Gender Fluidity by refusing to participate in the exercises under the confederation flag and came out!
Sincerely

[skipper83]

The complexes gave only one missile each. A full volley will not seem like a little.

[Ross xnumx]

Quote: SovAr238A

Greenhouse teachings teach nothing.

That's for sure. We must not shoot at targets, but put “live targets with a lifelong” ...
The characteristics of Russian anti-ship missiles are comparable to foreign counterparts. Torment yourself to a frenzy in peacetime? Although, why not try the domestic "Dagger" or "Onyx" on your own ship?

[tralflot1832]

That's how much money they launched into the sky! (Sarcasm) It is hard in training, easy in battle. It is necessary that each crew be so "fired at." cows below!

[Uncle lee]

the Americans tested their missile defense ... and got a missile on board!

[donavi49]

There is not much money actually. This complex was completed with the money of the Chinese, and this rocket was also made with the money of the Chinese. For the Indians and the beam was the norm. As a result, the Chinese have already had a third dozen frigates with 32 Shtil-1 UVPs and the Navy was able to order a normal complex (though only 24 missiles), and not a beam, moreover, even the Indians received a normal complex on the third contract, and not a beam without additional spending .

[SovAr238A]

Quote: Experienced_

But if they fired "Caliber" ohm - it would be funnier and the frigate would be checked at maximum speed)))

What kind of miracle caliber is it for you? Just a wunderwaffe?
For the target ship, the Caliber anti-ship missile system flying at it is not much different from the Uranus anti-ship missile system ...

[Pavel57]

Quote: paul3390

You don’t even know if it’s good or bad when your air defense system hit your own anti-ship missile system ...

Shield and sword, which is stronger.

[garri-lin]

Stronger is he who has a sharp sword and a strong shield.

[Konnick]

Someone does not finish. Or the launches of anti-ship missiles were conditional or against some kind of target, but in no way against a warship with a crew, there is too much risk, suddenly anti-ship missiles would have broken through and the self-destruction system would not have worked.

[Ros 56]

How to know, how to know, and what is prepared for partners? They are their own.

[bk0010]

Calm? But what about Redoubt?

[xorek]

Well done, they checked the electronic warfare, etc. Now the Anglo-Saxons need to hone their skills ..
And then the zaslanets got into the habit of running around in OUR World Cup

[iouris]

On the one hand, this is good. But on the other hand, this is very bad.

[Warhead-xnumx]

Either the frigate is good, or the complexes are bad ...

[kig]

Well, again, the missiles flew beautifully from the launcher and rushed off somewhere into the distance. Where are the hits?