Military Review

Ukrainian observer: Poland's presence of NSM complexes forces the Kremlin to abandon the landing in the Baltic

80

There is information that Poland has deployed anti-ship missiles Naval Strike Missile (NSM) developed by Norway in the Baltic Sea. These missiles are also used by the US Navy. NSM began to enter service in Poland in 2013. At the same time, missiles of such a plan can be deployed not only on ships, but also using the coastal infrastructure. It was the Naval Strike Missile in the ground version that Poland deployed on the Baltic coast.


The range of destruction of sea targets with this missile is up to 200 km. The Ukrainian media, discussing the performance of NSM missiles and the fact of their deployment by Poland, declare that such complexes "are capable of containing Russia in the Baltic."

Defense Express columnist Ivan Kirichevsky writes the following:

The presence of mobile anti-ship missile systems with a firing range of up to 200 kilometers is forcing the Kremlin to abandon its plans to land troops in the Baltic.

The Ukrainian author claims that if Ukraine deploys its Neptune strike systems on the Black Sea coast, it will "hold Russia back there too."

From the material in the Ukrainian media:

Ukraine needs the Neptune complex, and the more divisions, the better.

The article points out that when the Neptune coastal missile systems become part of the Ukrainian Navy, then "Russia will be forced to abandon the scenario of a large landing on the Black Sea coast of Ukraine."

It is noted that in this case there will be a threat to the landing ships of the Russian Black Sea Fleet.

Earlier, some Ukrainian "experts" stated that the "Neptune" missiles "can destroy the Crimean bridge."
80 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. skif8013
    skif8013 3 May 2021 11: 21
    +17
    ... The presence of mobile anti-ship missile systems with a firing range of up to 200 kilometers is forcing the Kremlin to abandon its plans to land troops in the Baltic.
    And the presence of the army and equipment in the form that Russia now has makes the Poles go to the toilet, and not only them!
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. hydrox
      hydrox 3 May 2021 12: 04
      +10
      So the Russians do not have so many dolbooxes to even just think about landing the troops in some kind of garbage dump that is not needed by ANYONE !!!
      And the dolbooppas do not understand that any of their army ends where the Russians organize boilers and use MLRS with explosive charges, and trenchers dig out memorial cemeteries in an hour for any number of regiments and divisions of "warriors of the world"
      1. Snail N9
        Snail N9 3 May 2021 12: 21
        +16
        Landing in the Baltic? Yes, -a ... He intimidated himself, he himself "defeated everyone" ... It looks like this is already schizophrenia - everywhere the attack of the "Russians" appears ...
        1. Pete mitchell
          Pete mitchell 3 May 2021 12: 29
          +5
          Quote: Snail N9
          He intimidated himself, he himself "defeated everyone" ...

          Wait, wait, we'll wait until they start complaining about the Russian Federation: they say we prepared collectively, mastered the budget, but these allow themselves to follow their interests and not be ... laughing
          Quote: Snail N9
          It seems that this is already schizophrenia - everywhere the attack of the "Russians" is imagined ...
        2. LiSiCyn
          LiSiCyn 3 May 2021 13: 11
          +7
          Poles live by yesterday.
          After all, they, too, were a country of the Warsaw bloc and, accordingly, were aware of how the "march to the English Channel" would take place ... The troops of the 2nd echelon were supposed to go through their territory. The transfer of troops was also envisaged by the sea, for which they were built at shipyards in Poland, BDK project 775.
          But that was a long time ago, and the world has changed. There is no longer on the territory of KOR, that "armored fist" that was supposed to smoke with diesel engines, tearing the concrete "Berlinki" in the direction of Grzechotok with caterpillars.
          The other day I was in Kornevo (Zinten). The Germans had 1 tank regiment there. The USSR has 2 tank regiments. Russia has 0.
          To the border with Poland, from 12 to 25 km.
          Incidentally, Zinten held out longer than Konigsberg. The terrain is suitable for defense.
          1. LiSiCyn
            LiSiCyn 3 May 2021 13: 58
            +3

            An extreme find from the forests around Kornevo (Tsitena).
            I'll write right away, I don't dig anything, I just walk ... laughing
        3. The comment was deleted.
        4. antivirus
          antivirus 3 May 2021 21: 17
          +2
          Chap the danger to uhrov - these are combat swimmers in Pripyat and the Dnieper - anti-sabotage nets must be set up now. will get out in Kyev and on foot to Khreshchatyk.
      2. Anatoly 288
        Anatoly 288 3 May 2021 14: 38
        +2
        3 rubles will not save the fathers of Polish democracy ... and even more so Ukrainian! And if Boshirov and Petrov come to Poland, then ... ..
    3. smart ass
      smart ass 3 May 2021 12: 55
      +1
      Does Russia really have no means to destroy these complexes before landing ?! Spy on a satellite and bang with an Iskander ?! For instance?!
      1. Piramidon
        Piramidon 3 May 2021 13: 01
        +7
        Quote: Clever man
        Doesn't Russia have the means to destroy these complexes before landing?

        First you need to ask - are we going to land there? Are we talking about crazy svidomye fantasies?
      2. Piramidon
        Piramidon 3 May 2021 13: 09
        +2
        Quote: Clever man
        Doesn't Russia have the means to destroy these complexes before landing?

        You need to ask - do we need this landing? What is there to discuss Svidomo nonsense?
      3. Piramidon
        Piramidon 3 May 2021 13: 15
        +1
        Quote: Clever man
        Doesn't Russia have the means to destroy these complexes before landing?

        And why, before discussing this Svidomo nonsense, not ask the question - why do we need this landing?
      4. Charik
        Charik 3 May 2021 16: 29
        0
        Maybe it's better to seize with special forces and turn to where they brought
      5. Rubi0
        Rubi0 3 May 2021 20: 09
        0
        Does Russia have a sufficient number of landing ships? Well, okay, even in the Baltic there is Kalleningrad, surrounded by unfriendly countries, about Ukraine, in general, is complete nonsense
        1. House 25 Sq. 380
          House 25 Sq. 380 9 May 2021 00: 47
          0
          "kalleningrad" - cyka, these are five, this, cyka, in memoriz ... Where are you from, human being ??)))
    4. knn54
      knn54 3 May 2021 12: 57
      +3
      So you can repeat the fate of the former head of the Pentagon James Forrestal.
    5. TermNachTer
      TermNachTer 3 May 2021 16: 45
      +1
      Interestingly, the author of this study knows what is the flight range of the "caliber" or "Iskander"?))) "Iskander" from the Kaliningrad region reach right up to the German coast, the Polish one is shot "through and through")))
  2. Nikolay Ivanov_5
    Nikolay Ivanov_5 3 May 2021 11: 22
    +11
    A stupid Ukrainian observer can only make us laugh.
    1. NDR-791
      NDR-791 3 May 2021 11: 44
      +7
      when the coastal missile systems "Neptune" become part of the Ukrainian Navy, then "Russia will be forced to abandon the scenario of a large landing on the Black Sea coast of Ukraine."
      wassat First of all, the key word is WHEN. Secondly, why do we need a landing on the "Black Sea coast of Ukraine", and even a large one? Small group tactics solve many issues, including those with "neptunes" ... which do not exist wassat
      1. 1976AG
        1976AG 3 May 2021 12: 43
        +7
        Quote: NDR-791
        when the coastal missile systems "Neptune" become part of the Ukrainian Navy, then "Russia will be forced to abandon the scenario of a large landing on the Black Sea coast of Ukraine."
        wassat First of all, the key word is WHEN. Secondly, why do we need a landing on the "Black Sea coast of Ukraine", and even a large one? Small group tactics solve many issues, including those with "neptunes" ... which do not exist wassat

        Here is something else interesting. It turns out that we are now planning this landing, but for some reason we are waiting for Ukraine to have a DBK. But when they appear, then we will abandon these plans. What can I say ... a masterpiece of logic.
        1. TermNachTer
          TermNachTer 3 May 2021 16: 46
          0
          While the enemy is writing plans, we are changing the terrain at this time))) the enemy falls into an unknown area and is lost)))
    2. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine 3 May 2021 11: 44
      +12
      Quote: Nikolay Ivanov_5
      A stupid Ukrainian observer can only make us laugh.

      Well, what can you do, the country of clowns and clowns.
    3. Alexander 3
      Alexander 3 3 May 2021 11: 52
      +6
      That's for sure. It's like I bought a hammer and if a bear comes into my door, I'll show him.
      1. cat Rusich
        cat Rusich 3 May 2021 12: 12
        +2
        Quote: Alexander 3
        It’s like I bought a hammer and if a bear comes into my door, I’ll show him.
        And I'll show you where to put it (the hammer), but only with the handle forward ... wassat
        1. skif8013
          skif8013 3 May 2021 12: 15
          +1
          Quote: cat Rusich
          Quote: Alexander 3
          It’s like I bought a hammer and if a bear comes into my door, I’ll show him.
          And I'll show you where to put it (the hammer), but only with the handle forward ... wassat

          Yes, you can and vice versa)
          1. cat Rusich
            cat Rusich 3 May 2021 12: 18
            +2
            Quote: skif8013
            Quote: cat Rusich
            Quote: Alexander 3
            It’s like I bought a hammer and if a bear comes into my door, I’ll show him.
            And I'll show you where to put it (the hammer), but only with the handle forward ... wassat

            Yes, you can and vice versa)
            If "blitzkrieg" - then handle forward soldier
        2. Alexander 3
          Alexander 3 3 May 2021 12: 17
          +2
          It seems to me that the banderlog has already been advised to cut down the front sight on machine guns. Let them not take offense, if that ...
        3. smart ass
          smart ass 3 May 2021 12: 56
          +3
          The bear will figure out where to shove it himself))
          1. cat Rusich
            cat Rusich 3 May 2021 13: 01
            +2
            Quote: Clever man
            The bear will figure out where to shove it himself))
            Then keep the fat for lubrication at hand, so as not to get confused in a hurry ... yes
    4. figwam
      figwam 3 May 2021 12: 05
      +1
      Ukrainian author states

      The garbage just keeps pouring in
    5. xorek
      xorek 3 May 2021 12: 10
      -1
      Quote: Nikolai Ivanov_5
      A stupid Ukrainian observer can only make us laugh.

      It's funny, of course, but don't forget they shed blood in the Donbass and every day there are shelling of peaceful people. That is scary, and others are encouraged to shoot in Russian villages negative
    6. 210ox
      210ox 3 May 2021 12: 24
      +1
      But the cocoa have a lot of plans. It was. Before the exercises of the army and navy. They were all blown away quickly.
  3. carstorm 11
    carstorm 11 3 May 2021 11: 23
    +9
    And who was going to land?)))) Today is the day of clowns at VO?)))
    1. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine 3 May 2021 11: 46
      +2
      Quote: carstorm 11
      Today is the day of clowns at VO?

      Rather, "Day of the Clown" in Ukraine. Or an Easter cake washed down with vodka and dust.
      1. xorek
        xorek 3 May 2021 12: 13
        -1
        Quote: tihonmarine
        Quote: carstorm 11
        Today is the day of clowns at VO?

        Rather, "Day of the Clown" in Ukraine. Or an Easter cake washed down with vodka and dust.

        These "clowns" kill civilians in the Donbass every day Vlad .. It's no laughing matter already
      2. skif8013
        skif8013 3 May 2021 12: 16
        +1
        Quote: tihonmarine
        Quote: carstorm 11
        Today is the day of clowns at VO?

        Rather, "Day of the Clown" in Ukraine. Or an Easter cake washed down with vodka and dust.

        So not the day of the clown, but the year. The circus does not want to leave in any way)
    2. sabakina
      sabakina 3 May 2021 11: 50
      0
      Quote: carstorm 11
      And who was going to land?)))) Today is the day of clowns at VO?)))

      Dmitry, 10 days off. The liver will not stand alcohol, the stomach will not stand the shish kebab. Humor remains. I hope my heart benefits from it. wink
      1. carstorm 11
        carstorm 11 3 May 2021 12: 29
        0
        Well, there is no reason to argue))) at least some kind of benefit from them))))
    3. Incvizitor
      Incvizitor 3 May 2021 14: 35
      +1
      It's always clown day.
  4. Machete
    Machete 3 May 2021 11: 24
    +3
    Therefore, the aliens have not yet landed, because they are afraid of NATO and Poland, in particular.
    I give a tooth.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. NIKN
      NIKN 3 May 2021 12: 04
      +1
      Quote: Machete
      that they are afraid of NATO and Poland in particular.

      Now, Ukraine will be feared like fire, especially "when" the Neptune coastal missile systems become part of the Ukrainian Navy. In general, they will exclude the possibility of getting in touch. It is because of such people that we will not be able to establish contact with aliens, although the Ukrainians (those who are in power) themselves can already be attributed to an unearthly (or not to human) civilization.
  5. Mouse
    Mouse 3 May 2021 11: 28
    +3
    All Poland, stop trembling ... you can sleep peacefully! laughing
    Kraina said !!!
  6. YOU
    YOU 3 May 2021 11: 33
    -1
    Yes, clowns. Spring has reached many sore brains. As if our landing ships (purely hypothetically, that is, in theory) would climb into an unsuppressed antiamphibious defense. And Poland, and especially the Outskirts, is so far away that it’s not without amphibious assault.
  7. Andre___86
    Andre___86 3 May 2021 11: 34
    +7
    Were you planning to land there at all? They really make an aggressor out of us.
    We don't need Poland, the Baltic states. Shaft of their own land, here it would be to put things in order, and to deal with someone else's.
    1. Fitter65
      Fitter65 3 May 2021 15: 08
      +1
      Quote: Andre___86
      We don't need Poland, the Baltic states. Shaft of their own land, here it would be to put things in order, and to deal with someone else's.

      You don’t need this, but they really want it, like in the times of the USSR, not only have they restored everything that the Germans destroyed for thanks, and like in the USSR everything is there, everything for free, for nothing, and everything that is for the USSR at world prices.
  8. Fitter65
    Fitter65 3 May 2021 11: 35
    +3
    The presence of mobile anti-ship missile systems with a firing range of up to 200 kilometers is forcing the Kremlin to abandon its plans to land troops in the Baltic.
    The Ukrainian author claims that if Ukraine deploys its Neptune strike systems on the Black Sea coast, it will "hold Russia back there too."
    The Ukrainian author is generally not on friendly terms with geography. Why amphibious operations in the presence of the Kaliningrad region, and an extended border with the countries outside the Baltic states? It's even funny to talk about Hohlfnd. And so everything is under supervision, though here one question immediately begs itself and what will happen first; the collapse of Ukraine or the deployment of its own type of such strike systems "Neptune"?
    1. vvvjak
      vvvjak 3 May 2021 11: 39
      +1
      Quote: Fitter65
      The Ukrainian author is generally not on friendly terms with geography.

      Not only geography and mathematics. 48 anti-ship missiles NSM Poland can only be stopped by the Belarusian fleet.
  9. prior
    prior 3 May 2021 11: 35
    +1
    Who would explain why a Russian landing party should land on a territory contaminated with radiation after a nuclear bombing? What is there to do?
    Or does someone hope that in the event of a world war it will be different?
  10. Cowbra
    Cowbra 3 May 2021 11: 37
    +3
    If anything, we'll send Petrov and Boshirov, they can't hold them back with all their strength.
    1. BIABIA
      BIABIA 3 May 2021 12: 06
      0
      One to Europe, the other to America. Enough for the eyes ...
  11. HAM
    HAM 3 May 2021 11: 42
    +3
    It looks like the "Village of Fools" has become a kind of country ...... the "experts" there are trying to outmaneuver each other in stupidity ..... every day, then another "analytic masterpiece" ....
  12. tihonmarine
    tihonmarine 3 May 2021 11: 43
    0
    The presence of mobile anti-ship missile systems with a firing range of up to 200 kilometers is forcing the Kremlin to abandon its plans to land troops in the Baltic.

    I don’t understand why the patients who escaped from the Kashchenko clinic find refuge in Ukraine. Isn't it time to return them to their foams for further treatment.
    1. Maikcg
      Maikcg 3 May 2021 23: 25
      0
      In no case!
      "... and exile all the holy fools and the poor to the Outskirts, there they belong to fools ..." (c) from Ivan the Terrible's Twitter, nicknamed Vasilyevich
  13. ultra
    ultra 3 May 2021 12: 08
    +1
    Lord, they are not running out? wassat
    1. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine 4 May 2021 08: 27
      0
      Quote: ultra
      Lord, they are not running out?

      Well, the pandemic in Ukraine.
  14. Pavel episkop
    Pavel episkop 3 May 2021 12: 11
    +1
    Why land on the coast when both of these countries are large land?
    1. aszzz888
      aszzz888 3 May 2021 12: 24
      0
      Pavel episkop (Pavel Tuberdin)
      Today, 12: 11
      NEW
      0
      Why land on the coast when both of these countries are large land?
      Or you can try to go from the rear, through Austria, the Czech Republic, Germany ... Oh, oh, here we are! wink And the pshek's rackets are directed in the other direction! laughing
  15. aszzz888
    aszzz888 3 May 2021 12: 18
    +1
    Defense Express editor Ivan Kirichevsky
    How many of them are there with asphalt in their heads, instead of brains! laughing
  16. cniza
    cniza 3 May 2021 12: 20
    +1
    The Kremlin abandon plans to land troops in the Baltic.


    And they were only in your sick head, which all the fools include ...
  17. rocket757
    rocket757 3 May 2021 12: 29
    0
    Ukrainian observer: Poland's presence of NSM complexes forces the Kremlin to abandon the landing in the Baltic
    ... They write / do what they pay for ... the oldest profession, however.
  18. Alex DHG
    Alex DHG 3 May 2021 12: 30
    0
    And why land troops from the sea on the outskirts, if the land border is about two thousand kilometers?
    1. Maikcg
      Maikcg 3 May 2021 23: 27
      0
      To overcome in the name of the Emperor!
  19. tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 3 May 2021 12: 36
    0
    So, it seems, before the landing, first they level the entire infrastructure of the enemy on the bridgehead to the ground. And then they land it, isn't it?
  20. Ratmir_Ryazan
    Ratmir_Ryazan 3 May 2021 12: 47
    +1
    It is foolish to think that Russia has landing ships only in order to land troops on the coast of an enemy who does not have anti-ship missiles.

    The landing on the large landing craft will only land after everything that threatens its landing has been destroyed.

    Mobile anti-ship missiles can be destroyed by OTRK, aviation (UAVs, high-precision missiles from a fighter-bomber), and a deviation group.
  21. Old26
    Old26 3 May 2021 14: 10
    +1
    Quote: Clever man
    Does Russia really have no means to destroy these complexes before landing ?! Spy on a satellite and bang with an Iskander ?! For instance?!

    Of course there are funds, but there is no need for satellites and Iskander. For this there is aviation, in extreme cases, artillery or MLRS. And to spend "Iskander" on a truck with two 300-kg missiles (NSM complex) - won't it be fat?
  22. serg.shishkov2015
    serg.shishkov2015 3 May 2021 14: 21
    +1
    Vnakrainskie genetics have developed a new variety of mushrooms? do they grow there tapericha all year round?
  23. VLADIMIR VLADIVOSTOK
    VLADIMIR VLADIVOSTOK 3 May 2021 14: 24
    0
    Who cares about Poland's opinion in the world?
    1. Aleksandr1971
      Aleksandr1971 3 May 2021 19: 53
      0
      In NATO, Poland's opinion carries some weight.
      And Poland wanted to spit on the opinion of non-NATO countries.
  24. tarakan
    tarakan 3 May 2021 16: 12
    +2
    Forgive me for my French, but nakuya to land troops in an entoy puddle, if you can walk along the shore?
  25. NF68
    NF68 3 May 2021 16: 53
    +1
    And if you consider that Poland and the Baltic for Russia are something like the elusive Joe type, which is not needed for any Russia, then Russia definitely does not plan to land troops in those areas. And if they press hard, then on land, as in 45, they will quickly reach wherever they need it.
  26. Aleksandr1971
    Aleksandr1971 3 May 2021 19: 52
    0
    I believe that NATO, in its hatred of Russia, will finally reach the decision to start a preventive war against Russia simply because Russia is bad.
  27. Aleksandr1971
    Aleksandr1971 3 May 2021 19: 54
    0
    Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
    It is foolish to think that Russia has landing ships only in order to land troops on the coast of an enemy who does not have anti-ship missiles.

    The landing on the large landing craft will only land after everything that threatens its landing has been destroyed.

    Mobile anti-ship missiles can be destroyed by OTRK, aviation (UAVs, high-precision missiles from a fighter-bomber), and a deviation group.


    You are not right.
    By the time there will be nothing threatening the Russian landing in Poland, there will not be any left in Russia to land on.
  28. Viktor Sergeev
    Viktor Sergeev 3 May 2021 21: 32
    0
    These idiots themselves come up with something, and then prove that it is impossible. Why does Russia need Poland?
  29. st2st
    st2st 4 May 2021 07: 45
    0
    The toothless and incomprehensible policy of the Russian Federation in relation to the LPNR will only lead to casualties among the civilian population of the republics.
  30. Evil 55
    Evil 55 4 May 2021 08: 44
    0
    They scare themselves ... Although the Poles are afraid of the BDK of their own "Polish" construction of Project 775, of which there are very few of them in the Baltic Fleet ...
  31. APASUS
    APASUS 4 May 2021 09: 57
    0
    Landing on the shores of the Polish Baltic coastline? Something smoked again at the Polish General Staff and immediately REMOVA!
  32. Ros 56
    Ros 56 4 May 2021 12: 19
    0
    The durilka is made of cardboard, with serious mixing, only dust will remain from you with the lyakhi.
  33. va3610
    va3610 6 May 2021 21: 26
    0
    Ukrainian media know how to be proud of other people's achievements, even weed ones.
  34. House 25 Sq. 380
    House 25 Sq. 380 9 May 2021 00: 51
    0
    "give him parabellum" (c)
  35. alexander ivanov_9
    alexander ivanov_9 1 June 2021 06: 10
    0
    scared we are wild !! I'm not talking about Russia - one Kaliningrad will blow Poland off a topographic map in 2 minutes - historians will have to prove that there was once Poland