Western partners are worried again - now the entry of the Russian Navy ship into Port Sudan

Western partners expressed their next concern about the "military activity of Russia." As it turns out, this time the concern in the already "immensely disturbed" Western environment was caused by the Russian intelligence ship "Ivan Khurs", which made a call to Port Sudan.

Information about the entry of a Russian ship with radio-technical weapons into Port Sudan was published by local sources. The intelligence ship of the Russian Navy "Ivan Khurs" thus becomes the second Russian warship to enter the port of the African state of Sudan in the last three weeks. In March, the Russian Navy's missile corvette Stoyky called at the same port.

The West is concerned that Russia is restoring its military presence in Africa, while “creating a new base for its naval fleet in a strategically important direction ”.

It is noteworthy that some time ago, US representatives met with the Sudanese leadership, declaring their readiness for "all-round support of the state and its people." This is despite the fact that for a number of years the fate of the Sudanese people did not bother Washington in any way. The fact is that the United States introduced and for a long time maintained the most stringent sanctions against Sudan. Now the desire to "provide assistance to Sudan" on the part of the United States is clearly connected with an attempt to prevent Russia from creating an object on the Sudanese coast of the Red Sea. Earlier, the local media directly said that the United States raised this issue when discussing with the country's authorities.

At the moment, the Ministry of Defense has not officially commented on the reports on the entry of the Ivan Khurs ship into the Sudanese port.

Comments

[rocket757]

What to say then?
Oh Yankees ... so nothing new.
About our ship ... so nothing unusual, interesting.
What is that in general ???

[cniza]

It remains about the weather, we want quiet and peaceful ...

[Petr Vladimirovich]

By the way, it was a funky day today ...

[Real Pilot]

The question is in the principles of international law.

First, sovereignty. This applies to both Russia and Sudan. That is, interference in the internal affairs of two third countries is at least not encouraged by a set of international agreements under the auspices of the UN. This is not quite a law, it is a postulated principle of non-interference in other people's affairs when it comes to the application of Chapter 7 of the UN Charter by the Security Council (international military intervention to protect the world from acts of aggression).

Second, the principle of reciprocity. It is used to expel diplomats, impose sanctions, etc. It is interpreted very broadly. Now, if the United States did not climb into the Black and Baltic Seas, did not arrange maritime provocations near the Kuril Islands and other situations that threaten us, then their concern could be understood. But given the fact that they are doing themselves, we can mutually ignore their indignation.

And thirdly, their attempts to apply extraterritorially and to impose their own legislation do not a priori comply with international law. Therefore, in accordance with the laws of Sudan and Russia, the interstate interaction of the armed forces is completely legitimate, including the issues of the "freedom of navigation and navigation" so beloved by the Americans.

[Nikolay Ivanov_5]

Star-striped need to figure out in their garden first, and then climb to others.

[alex neym_2]

And what the hell are mattress mats to do in the Black Sea? Why don't the "Western partners" care? Or is it in the order of the rules they set on their own?

[Nemchinov Vl]

Quote: RealPilot

First, sovereignty. This applies to both Russia and Sudan. That is, interference in the internal affairs of two countries by a third is at least discouraged. a set of international agreements under the auspices of the UN.

it seemed to me, or you are under "euphoria" (from the movie - "Highway 60"....) ?!
sounds more sober, -

Quote: RealPilot

... This is not quite a law, it is a postulated principle of non-interference in other people's affairs,

Iii? !! how does it work in practice, from "weak to strong" .... basically .... ?! effective steps are taken into account, influencing REALLY to the sales market (including, .... not only "concerns") ....? !!!
Of your items ...

Quote: RealPilot

Second, the principle of reciprocity ....

and even -

Quote: RealPilot

And thirdly, their attempts ...

wow how much water ... they would immediately say their key idea, -

Quote: RealPilot

their attempts to apply extraterritorially and to impose their own legislation are a priori inconsistent with international law. Therefore, in accordance with the laws of Sudan and Russia

...... !!
That's so (!).
Honestly !!
Briefly !!
and essentially !!!

[Andrei Nikolaevich]

Let them pray to God that "Peter the Great" does not come in ..

[Xnumx vis]

Quote: Andrey Nikolaevich

Let them pray to God that "Peter the Great" does not come in ..

and did not open a window to Europe!

[Ingvar 72]

Quote: Andrey Nikolaevich

Let them pray to God that "Peter the Great" does not come in ..

Well, it will come in, so what?
Isn't it funny to discuss this farce (mince)?

[Machete]

I remember that local citizens were worried that our Foreign Ministry was always worried.
Now ours are not particularly worried, and the entire "civilized" world does not come out of a state of concern.

Do we need to worry about this?

[General failure]

and the entire "civilized" world does not come out of a state of concern.

Send them a barrel of valerian. With home delivery. "Calibers".

[Machete]

We need tranquilizers for elephants. Not less.

[General failure]

They will manage with valerian, tea not at the bar.
Elephants need tranquilizers.

[ironic]

Again zhakh "Poplar"? Not tired?

[Tusv]

Quote: Machete

Do we need to worry about this?

Base in Tartus for 11 ships, in Port Sudan for 4. Not. Doesn't bother me at all. I'm worried about the future base in Haifa

[Paranoid50]

Quote: Tusv

I'm worried about the future base in Haifa

And why worry there - it has already been covered in advance by our S-400 stationed in the same Tartus.

[ironic]

C-400 on the base? Give Assad a present to zhahn? Original. Again, Jordanian peasants from their backyards will rake debris?

[ironic]

Why Haifa didn't please you? Is someone threatening you from Haifa? Who! By the way, there is a naval base there and now.

[Paranoid50]

Quote: Machete

I remember that local citizens were worried that our Foreign Ministry was always worried.

Many "local citizens", especially when on a glass, are often prone to hysterical reactions - but this is the sphere of activity of medical workers. In principle, this also applies to those who are not hysterical, but for the same reason they constantly "crush the sour" without any argumentation, for which they have earned themselves the honorary title of "dull excrement."

[Petr Vladimirovich]

Cool, buddy !!!

[Victor_B]

But we should not worry about American visits to the Black Sea!
For they are white and fluffy!
And we are Mordor and the totalitarian orcs.

[Alexander 3]

The curly-haired Bastion will meet the white and fluffy ones, if they are in the Black Sea for a long time, he will tear them.

[cniza]

The fact is that the United States introduced and for a long time maintained the most stringent sanctions against Sudan. Now the desire to "provide assistance to Sudan" on the part of the United States is clearly connected with an attempt to prevent Russia from creating an object on the Sudanese coast of the Red Sea.

The adversaries bustled, so we are doing everything right ...

[Captain Pushkin]

Quote: cniza

The fact is that the United States introduced and for a long time maintained the most stringent sanctions against Sudan. Now the desire to "provide assistance to Sudan" on the part of the United States is clearly connected with an attempt to prevent Russia from creating an object on the Sudanese coast of the Red Sea.

The adversaries bustled, so we are doing everything right ...

Duc and Sudanese can hurry up. For example, to say to amers: "that the ship is an empty matter ..." They, in fact, decided to become part of Russia, because A.S. Pushkin. was from blacks.
But for 10 billion Baku cash, they are ready to change their mind ...

[for]

Most of all, these visits and overflights are of ours, that of theirs ships and planes, only the media. In the days of the USSR, specifically our ship was flown over and around by the Japanese painfully, no one was worried and did not write in the newspapers.

[tralflot1832]

Yeah, I personally, upon the arrival of the KGB, asked if I had time to take a photo when F 16 made a hill above us on afterburner. In the USSR, ours only poked their nose with irrefutable photos of the US Ambassador, and more than once!

[Thrifty]

The word "partners" should be put in quotation marks, because such "partners" are just enemies in reality!

[Gennady Fomkin]

From my point of view, there are interesting people there, besides there are artifacts. It is one of the few countries in the world capable of withstanding a massive nuclear attack due to a system of mountainous and simply tunnels throughout most of the country. There, fighting like in Vietnam for tens of years can be won. There are systems under the scheme designed not only for a complete nuclear war, but for the fall of a large asteroid. From Sudan, the south of the Red Sea is controlled, but not the north and there is the Suez Canal. Therefore, it is a great temptation for the United States to take control of the channel, then our base in Sudan is automatically devalued.

[lucul]

Therefore, it is a great temptation for the United States to take control of the channel, then our base in Sudan is automatically devalued.

Why ?
If you wish, you can control this transport artery from Sudan, simply by blocking shipping in the Red Sea.

[Xnumx vis]

Very good ship Ivan Khurs !!! The good ship Ivan Khurs is in a very right place!

[Gennady Fomkin]

In Somalia, the United States has already had a fiasco. And the organism of the United States, like any consensus oligarchy, looks like a leopard-type predator. If he gets in the face from the intended victim, he remembers and does not climb. As with Cuba and Somalia.

On the other hand, Somalia is not a critical place for control. The critical is the Suez Canal.

[tralflot1832]

I wonder where Ivan Khurs is going to or from the Persian Gulf?

[Ruslan Sulima]

Work, brothers!

[Private SA]

It's like tank wheels from T-54, T-55 scattered across the Ogaden desert.
In the Somalia conflict, Ethiopia. Our factory made these wheels. And something
still.

[Tahtvjd2868]

This is also a question of who is worried about what .. In the above quote, there is not a word about concern. Only the fact of the call is stated! When a foreign ship came to us, our media would also have written about it. But in the article from the finger sucks CARE !! Those. The manipulation is CONSCIOUSLY carried out!

[sgr291158]

Aren't the Western partners concerned about the entry of American ships into the Black Sea?