Military Review

Less than 50 UN countries consider Russia a party to the armed conflict in Donbass

48

A list of countries that consider Russia a party to the conflict in Donbass has been published. We are talking about the countries that supported the new statement to the UN resolution, dedicated to the issues of "territorial integrity of Ukraine" (the title of the resolution).


The Ukrainian Foreign Ministry announced that "the international community has shown its attitude towards the annexation of Crimea by Russia and the occupation of Ukrainian territory." It was also added that "the international community recognizes Russia as a party to the conflict in the south-east of Ukraine."

As it turns out, Kiev named less than 50 countries "the international community", namely 46 states out of more than 200 that are members of the United Nations.

Among the countries that decided to support the "new statement" on the old resolution, traditionally the USA, Canada, Britain, Australia, New Zealand, EU countries (and not all), Georgia, Moldova, Turkey, Japan, Federated States of Micronesia, Costa Rica, North Macedonia and Ukraine itself.

The overwhelming majority of UN countries decided to either refrain from making statements, or noted that Russia is not considered a party to the conflict on the territory of Ukraine.

The Ukrainian Foreign Ministry expressed satisfaction that this "international community" volunteered to support the work of the so-called "Crimean platform".

At the same time, Ukrainian users noted that support is becoming less and less significant. If initially more than a hundred countries voted “for” on the resolution, now, when “additional information is required,” “support for Ukraine has dropped to 46 countries, along with Ukraine itself.”

It was noted that even some EU countries actually indicated their unwillingness to consider the Russian Federation as a party to the conflict in Donbass. For example, we are talking about Hungary. Not among the “supporting Ukraine” and Latin American countries (with the exception of Costa Rica).
Photos used:
Facebook / 28 ombre APU
48 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Victor_B
    Victor_B 27 March 2021 06: 23
    +6
    As it turns out, Kiev named less than 50 countries "the international community", namely 46 states out of more than 200 that are members of the United Nations.
    And the rest, what have they officially recognized?
    Have you officially condemned Russia at the level of the foreign ministries for participating in the war?
    Or some "parliamentarians" (Zhiriks of some kind) got worn out on camera?
    Or did someone write on social media?
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. Victor_B
        Victor_B 27 March 2021 06: 36
        +9
        Quote: GTYCBJYTH2021
        Less than fifty is forty-nine, apparently ....

        And about 70 more do not even know that Ukraine is on the planet.
        1. Olgovich
          Olgovich 27 March 2021 07: 57
          +5
          Quote: Victor_B
          Quote: GTYCBJYTH2021
          Less than fifty is forty-nine, apparently ....

          And about 70 more do not even know that Ukraine is on the planet.


          see what these 46 inadequacies write in this statement:
          We confirm our support through the Normandy format and a strong commitment to a peaceful solution to the conflict in eastern Ukraine, in according to the Minsk agreements . Russia is a party conflict in eastern Ukraine, not a mediator.


          Indeed, according to the Minsk Agreements, Russia is NOT a party to the conflict and has not undertaken to carry out ANYTHING and has not been obliged by anyone.

          That is, they have it, simultaneously, and ... not a party to the conflict and a party.
          1. venik
            venik 27 March 2021 09: 19
            +2
            Quote: Olgovich
            see what these 46 inadequacies write in this statement:
            We confirm our support

            ============
            good No words! Some "expressions" ... drinks soldier yes
          2. Vladimir Mashkov
            Vladimir Mashkov 27 March 2021 20: 58
            +2
            Quote: Olgovich
            That is, they have it, at the same time, and ... not a party to the conflict and a party.

            The usual two-faced Western "democracy" and "truth".
            As for the "international community" in the amount of 45 countries (Ukraine itself, of course, does not count) from more than 200 countries of the world, this is just the United States with the most obedient vassals led by the EU. This is NOT the international community !!!
        2. frruc
          frruc 27 March 2021 10: 25
          +2
          The outskirts itself can be attributed to a non-state, a temporary territorial entity.
    2. Pessimist22
      Pessimist22 27 March 2021 06: 36
      +8
      I would like to note that Zhirinovsky always predicted about Ukraine for years to come, despite his emotionality
    3. Lionnvrsk
      Lionnvrsk 27 March 2021 07: 19
      0
      Quote: Victor_B
      And the rest

      And the rest are Putin's agents and it is necessary to impose sanctions against them. lol
      1. Insurgent
        Insurgent 27 March 2021 07: 45
        0
        Among the countries that decided to support the "new statement" on the old resolution, traditionally the United States, Canada, Britain, Australia, New Zealand, EU countries (and not all), Georgia, Moldova, Turkey, Japan, Federated States of Micronesia, Costa Rica, North Macedonia and Ukraine itself.


        Ну what ... Then not two hundred, but somehow so, and then, on a market day ...

      2. Yves762
        Yves762 27 March 2021 07: 47
        0
        Less than 50 UN countries consider Russia a party to the armed conflict in Donbass

        Ага.
        Most don't care, as always ...request
    4. figwam
      figwam 27 March 2021 08: 35
      0
      Quote: Victor_B
      And the rest, what have they officially recognized?

      Yes, there most of NATO is a party to the conflict.
      1. Nyrobsky
        Nyrobsky 27 March 2021 09: 16
        +2
        Quote: figvam
        Quote: Victor_B
        And the rest, what have they officially recognized?

        Yes, there most of NATO is a party to the conflict.

        In principle, it is true. Some will throw off old armored vehicles with dill, some will throw ammunition, some will throw instructors, but one way or another, almost all are accomplices of the junta. Of the 46 countries that consider Russia a party to the conflict, 30 countries are members of NATO and 16 are from the category of "not sewn a sleeve", but dependent on mattresses.
        However, in general, the tendency is that most UN countries clearly understand who is the main troublemaker in the world and dissociated themselves from supporting the interpretation imposed by mattresses.
        1. figwam
          figwam 27 March 2021 09: 39
          +1
          Quote: Nyrobsky
          In principle, it is true. Some will throw off old armored vehicles with dill, some will throw ammunition, some will throw instructors, but one way or another, almost all are accomplices of the junta.

          So I’m talking about the same thing, against us, as always, united Europe plus all sorts of the United States, Canada, Turkey, and everyone is helping to tear the outskirts from us.
    5. venik
      venik 27 March 2021 08: 55
      +1
      Quote: Victor_B
      And the rest, what have they officially recognized?

      ========
      And what, have the states of lackeys have already died out? So they "recognized" that together!
  2. Retvizan 8
    Retvizan 8 27 March 2021 06: 35
    +7
    Yes, no matter who is there that counts!
    Let the rabid joyfully ride on Ukro-in "Europe is with us, America is with us"! ...
    And Russia has helped and will continue to help the people of Donbass!
    Our cause is just, we will win!
  3. Lech from Android.
    Lech from Android. 27 March 2021 06: 41
    +4
    For some reason, the UN is silent about non-citizens of Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania ... the egregious fact of apartheid on a national basis in Eastern Europe. This disgrace must be fought by this organization ... it has been going on for so many years, but there is no sense from the UN in this matter.
    1. Cowbra
      Cowbra 27 March 2021 07: 03
      +4
      What does the UN think about the parties to the conflict in Syria? That's very curious. By the way, it is also interesting about Ukraine - starting from the SBU building, 2 floors of which are clearly occupied by whom, judging by the US flag on the building, for example, to the leadership of the Maidan from the territory of the United States - officially. Where was the headquarters located? And the embassy is the territory of the country. And this, by the way, was officially declared by the very same "headquarters"
    2. kulinar
      kulinar 27 March 2021 18: 05
      -1
      Quote: Lech from Android.
      For some reason, the UN is silent about non-citizens of Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania ... the egregious fact of apartheid on a national basis in Eastern Europe. This disgrace must be fought by this organization ... it has been going on for so many years, but there is no sense from the UN in this matter.

      There are no non-citizens in Lithuania!
      All of them were granted citizenship with a zero qualification!
  4. Yaro Polk
    Yaro Polk 27 March 2021 06: 44
    +4
    Does Costa Rica even know where Ukraine is?
    And this Costa Rica has already asked Russia for Sputnik VI?)
    1. aszzz888
      aszzz888 27 March 2021 07: 29
      +2

      Yaro Polk (Yaro Polk)
      Today, 06: 44
      NEW
      +1
      Does Costa Rica even know where Ukraine is?
      Good afternoon. But such - you will not find on the world map without a magnifying glass - countries know exactly who is their boss, and whose grandmother they are still allowed to breathe. (however, to breathe, too, in debt) wink
  5. st2st
    st2st 27 March 2021 07: 03
    +2
    Tell me the numbers of the combat units of the Russian army, the names of the commanders taking part in the so-called "Russian-Ukrainian" war, and I will believe that Russia is at war with Nazalezhna. Even the Barmaley in Syria has a gradation of military formations. And the unfounded accusations of aggression on Russia are nothing more than nonsense of flea Europeans and Ukraine
    1. The leader of the Redskins
      The leader of the Redskins 27 March 2021 07: 42
      -7
      I will tell you a story from my childhood:
      I was 12 years old. My mother and I were walking around our city and suddenly we heard someone "playing war"! We see - from the window of the second floor, a gray-haired man in the form of a pilot, with award strips "fires back" from invisible enemies with some kind of piece of wood.
      - Mom, is he drunk?
      - No, Igor, he's crazy. He fought in Korea, they shot him down, so his mind started off ...
      I have already read the history, I was interested in wars.
      - Did our people fight in Korea?
      - We fought. Only you can't talk about it ...

      And now you tell me - did you declare war on the USSR against South Korea?
      Or did that unfortunate pilot fly there himself in a MiG? He earned himself medals and orders, he had problems with his head ...
      Or get off with the trendy phrase "I didn't send him there"!
      And some part numbers and surnames are easy to find on the Internet. With photo and video evidence. There would be a desire to search ...
      And if you expect Putin, Lavrov and Shoigu to come out on the porch and read out a decree declaring war ... then you will not wait ...
      1. Profiler
        Profiler 27 March 2021 08: 06
        +2
        Quote: Leader of the Redskins
        And now you tell me - did you declare war on the USSR against South Korea?


        Before asking such a question, take the trouble to first find out if at that time South Korea (in fact, like the DPRK) was a recognized UN member state ...

        The administration of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Ro Dae Woo, advocated "cross-recognition" of North and South Korea and their simultaneous entry into the UN. In September 1989, President Ro Dae Woo put forward the idea of ​​forming a "Korean community" as an interim step to reunite the North and South into a "united democratic republic."

        On July 19, 1991, South Korean Foreign Minister Lee Sang Ok submitted to the UN Secretary General his country's application for membership in the UN. In accordance with the procedure, it was sent for consideration to the Security Council, which, by its decision, referred it to the Committee for the Admission of New Members. On August 6, 1991, the Committee considered the application of the DPRK and ROK and unanimously decided to recommend both states for separate receptions of the UN members.

        On 17 September 1991, the General Assembly, at its 46th session, considering item 20 of its agenda, "Admission of new members to the United Nations," decided to admit the Democratic People's Republic of Korea and the Republic of Korea to membership in the United Nations. " By this, a historic event took place, which symbolized the entry of the two Korean states into the world community as full-fledged subjects of international relations. A new state appeared in the list of UN member states - the Republic of Korea, which became the 161st member of the Organization.
        1. The leader of the Redskins
          The leader of the Redskins 28 March 2021 09: 02
          -7
          It was a recognized state. The same UN, otherwise the organization would not have sent a multinational peacekeeping contingent there.
      2. Volder
        Volder 27 March 2021 09: 48
        +4
        Quote: Leader of the Redskins
        - Did our people fight in Korea?
        - We fought. Only you can't talk about it ...
        And now you tell me - did you declare war on the USSR against South Korea?
        Did Ukraine declare war on Russia during the Chechen War of the 1990s? Not. However, on the side of the Chechen terrorist fighters, while on the territory of the Russian Federation, several hundred citizens of Ukraine fought. UkroSMI does not like to remember this, but the fact remains: the Ukrainians in Chechnya with weapons in their hands helped the Chechen fighters to fight against Russia.
        1. The leader of the Redskins
          The leader of the Redskins 27 March 2021 10: 20
          -9
          There were. A well-known fact. But...
          Excuse me, but they "took" with them the equipment assigned to the parts? Tanks, armored personnel carriers, infantry fighting vehicles?
          1. Insurgent
            Insurgent 27 March 2021 14: 09
            +4
            Quote: Leader of the Redskins
            There were. A well-known fact. But...
            Excuse me, but they "took" with them the equipment assigned to the parts? Tanks, armored personnel carriers, infantry fighting vehicles?


            Well, if with Chechnya fact documented , then where the facts, similarly confirmed that "someone, somewhere, sometime"," brought "equipment with you?

            Where are the pads? Where are the documents? Where are the facts that you Leader love so much ???

            Where are the numbers of the burnt "Armat"?

            If you were a gentleman wassat , I probably would have taken their word for it, but since you are not, then substantiate your claims to the RF Armed Forces with evidence.
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. Insurgent
                Insurgent 27 March 2021 14: 24
                +4
                Quote: Leader of the Redskins

                Tower from T 72 b3. Burned down near Ilovaisk. Few? Banned on Google? Or is it just an unpleasant truth? And not only tanks can be found.


                Chief, this is not a document, for that matter that you need the truth "comfortable" laughing

                But where is she, "convenient for Kiev" ??? Where are the "killer facts" that can be smashed to pieces in court, in the UN, in The Hague - can they smash Russia?

                Where?

                1. The leader of the Redskins
                  The leader of the Redskins 27 March 2021 14: 26
                  -9
                  Well then, name its the truth. If photo and video materials are not for you. An order signed by Shoigu? I'm afraid you and I will never see him.
                  1. Insurgent
                    Insurgent 27 March 2021 14: 37
                    +4
                    Quote: Leader of the Redskins
                    Well, then, name your truth. If photo and video materials are not for you. An order signed by Shoigu? I'm afraid you and I will never see him.

                    My the truth is that all OUR equipment comes with "broken numbers" in one way or another, so it is not at all possible to determine its belonging.
                    As for Russian technology presumably (no more) that visited us, then the EU, but no one saw the numbers on it ...

                    BUT ... Nevertheless, the Ukrop side does not have ANY significant evidence of the involvement of units and formations of the RF Armed Forces with the equipment attached to them in certain events.

                    What is ? Only mooing and moving hands. Even against the background of the fact that supposedly "once, someone" captured the captain and warrant officer of the RF Armed Forces near Svetlodarsk on a tanker "carrying diesel fuel for the Russian T-90s" ...


                    NO, Chief. Calm down already ...
                    1. The comment was deleted.
                      1. The comment was deleted.
                2. The leader of the Redskins
                  The leader of the Redskins 27 March 2021 22: 05
                  -6
                  By the way, since you climb into Russia without soap, then at least take the trouble to study our laws. And they say that:

                  Photos obtained without violating Russian law can be presented in court as evidence

                  So what did you say about the rag there?
                  1. Insurgent
                    Insurgent 28 March 2021 07: 30
                    +2
                    Quote: Leader of the Redskins
                    So what did you say about the rag there?

                    What should I tell you about rags when you fooled, and that comment was deleted, with a warning crying
                    Quote: Leader of the Redskins
                    Photos obtained without violating Russian law can be presented in court as evidence

                    yes

                    1. The leader of the Redskins
                      The leader of the Redskins 28 March 2021 07: 35
                      -9
                      Learn to respect rules and laws small. Start with VO. And then you will get to the state ones.
                      Have you posted the pictures again?
                      Is that what your proof is? So let's go to The Hague!
                      And if this is the level of your sense of humor ... Then you should go to Petrosyan or a "full house". Their level.
                      1. Insurgent
                        Insurgent 28 March 2021 07: 41
                        +1
                        Quote: Leader of the Redskins
                        Learn to respect rules and laws small. Start with VO. And then you will get to the state ones.

                        I am not ashamed to ask you yourself - how many warnings you have from the administration, whether they are the result of violations "small rules and laws".

                        I assume that you also have violations. yes ... In that case, what is the right, primarily moral , Do You Have For Moralities?
                      2. The comment was deleted.
                      3. The comment was deleted.
                      4. The comment was deleted.
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. The comment was deleted.
  • aszzz888
    aszzz888 27 March 2021 07: 26
    -1
    The overwhelming majority of UN countries decided to either refrain from making statements, or noted that Russia is not considered a party to the conflict on the territory of Ukraine.
    How interesting our neighbors showed themselves this time, V.ch. RB?
    1. Avior
      Avior 27 March 2021 08: 24
      +4
      A negative tendency has gone to VO - to write anonymous articles, from which nothing can be understood.
      What kind of statement, what, who voted against, who abstained, who did not participate at all - there is nothing in the article. :(
  • yuliatreb
    yuliatreb 27 March 2021 07: 40
    0
    All the same, the media on the worst of nuclear weapons is a fact. And it is applied exclusively by all states in order to form a stable opinion of citizens in the correctness of actions, political decisions and convictions by a third party in favor of the prosecutor. The United States has far succeeded in this, developing television and the media at an unprecedented pace, which was noticeable back in the days of the USSR, and we lagged far behind in this regard, now we are losing in this direction on all fronts, which we have subsequently.
  • Yves762
    Yves762 27 March 2021 07: 48
    +2
    Less than 50 UN countries consider Russia a party to the armed conflict in Donbass

    Ага.
    Most don't care, as always .... request
  • svp67
    svp67 27 March 2021 07: 58
    0
    It was noted that even some EU countries actually indicated their unwillingness to consider the Russian Federation as a party to the conflict in Donbass. For example, we are talking about Hungary.
    Still, Ugorshchina can also be brought under this "article" ...
  • ork_333
    ork_333 27 March 2021 08: 04
    +3
    Well, here Micronesia alone is worth hundreds of votes ...)))
  • evgen1221
    evgen1221 27 March 2021 08: 06
    0
    Count the countries of the British Commonwealth ruled by the Queen and heavily dependent on the United States. Here is the result. Hungary is rather begging for handouts with its demarche.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • rocket757
    rocket757 27 March 2021 08: 21
    0
    As mentioned earlier in Odessa .... and International is this and what they eat ???
    There are periods of history when, after a big nix, the biggest are forced to agree on something !!! and for some time these agreements are being fulfilled!
    But, it doesn’t happen too long ..... and there WAS NO big nix for a long time!
  • Evil 55
    Evil 55 27 March 2021 08: 26
    +4
    Strange ... I thought that there are only 193 states in the UN, not 200 ..
    1. Ros 56
      Ros 56 27 March 2021 08: 51
      -2
      You have forgotten how many of them were formed after the defeat of Yugoslavia.
  • Ros 56
    Ros 56 27 March 2021 08: 50
    0
    Well, what else could you expect from grunting mongrels? Everything is logical, otherwise the main one will whip and put him in a corner. fellow
  • xorek
    xorek 27 March 2021 08: 57
    -7
    And here the analyst will not understand who in the world kindles and supports such conflicts in the world ..! I don't think it's worth listing the names of countries and financial structures?
    Now, inside Russia, they are again heating up the turmoil .. Divide and rule! Whose slogan is this?
  • iouris
    iouris 27 March 2021 10: 24
    -2
    Only one opinion is important - the opinion of the owner of the mountain.
  • orionvitt
    orionvitt 27 March 2021 14: 21
    0
    "The international community recognizes Russia as a party to the conflict in the south-east of Ukraine"
    Volpros to the "international community". Does it consider the United States to be a party to the conflict? If not, then this whole "international community" is worthless.