Letters from the "red zone". The first

65

Start. A red zone door handle clicked. And I was taken to the ward, where my future life was to be decided. Gradually, I began to receive information from my smartphone about what was happening “there”.

I could think and remember, but I could not react. There is much that is difficult to understand without feeling it on yourself, without passing another test of strength, of your strength, of the help of others. Therefore, bypassing this part of life, I cannot but share some of the thoughts that appeared between the next procedures.

Because thousands of years before us, the sage defined the meaning of human life as follows:



“Whatever your hand can do, do it with your might;

because in the grave where you will go, there is no work, no reflection, no knowledge, no wisdom. "

(Ecclesiastes, chap. 9, 10).

And the whole life flashed before my eyes.

A lot of people from different countries and nationalities, with whom I had to work together, with whom I studied and whom I taught. Word - spoken and printed, in the native language and in many others.

And echoes of the latest impressions of what is happening in the world.

About the triumph of the bestial Nazi ideology based on the blood and hunger of people, on the humiliation of their human dignity, on the prohibition of man to be human.

Many generals have appeared - "from the stool", who out of greed are ready to devour their own children.
There is neither the ability nor the desire to name those who sometimes deceive themselves.

First of all, I noticed that someone suddenly decided to discover the difference between the "Soviet" and "Russian" education systems. Having made my way from first-grader to professor, I could not find the "Soviet" education system. Yes, there was a system of various educational institutions. But the question is, what were they taught?

My first school teacher was one of the members of the society of noblewomen who went to the people to rid them of the oppression of illiteracy.

Our family, after fulfilling my duty in the Far East, carried out by my father, brought me with scurvy to Zvenigorod near Moscow. First they rented an apartment in the Barmins' house.

In front of the house, on the edge of the ravine, there was a tree, under which, according to stories, A.P. Chekhov. And in the attic of the house, I leafed through, of course, not really understanding, a volume of religious works by L.N. Tolstoy, Prince Trubetskoy, Kant and many others, who remained in the child's subconscious. And this was not a "Soviet" education, but an acquaintance with the achievements of Russian and world culture.

And in 1938 in the cinema I saw the film "Alexander Nevsky" for the first time and for the rest of my life I remembered the melody of Prokofiev's Oratorio

"Arm yourself, Russians, arm yourself!"

Therefore, the news that some hanger of Korotich is preparing an "exposing" libel against Alexander Nevsky, I could not help but perceive it as another attack on the saints of the Russian land.

I remembered the church of Alexander Nevsky at the foot of Shipka and the story of the Bulgarians accompanying me about the gold that the USSR leadership allocated for this church.

It is Alexander Nevsky who owns the words spoken in the Cathedral of St. Sophia in Novgorod before the battle with the Swedes:

"God is not in power, but in truth!"

And this was the power of our education, which absorbed all the best that was created before us by Russian and world culture.

This power made me, at the age of twelve, put on an overcoat on a thin boyish body. She also encouraged me and other cadets to study military history under the leadership of a retired captain of the Russian Imperial Army. By the way, the study of the history of past battles for the boys of today would be more interesting and useful than the current computer game "scarecrows".

That is why he spent almost his entire adult life in the field of dual technologies, when defense issues were always more important than a comfortable life.

If we summarize what has been said, then we are talking about the upbringing and education of comprehensively developed people with a high sense of human dignity.

This is exactly what the enemies of our people, our country want to eliminate. But already in the first primers we read:

"We are not slaves, we are not slaves."

What do these enemies offer us under the guise of "liberal", "reformist" and similar disguised projects of supposedly "Russian" education?

Again, the "market people" offer us, under the guise of a "Russian" education system, focused on the "labor market". Our peoples already know how they understand the "market". To deceive, under the guise of a quality product, slip a surrogate, and even make fun of suckers. Steal someone else's under the sauce of privatization. Do nothing under an excuse

“The invisible hand of the market”.

And now to make people a sale product.

The Americans themselves are very good at showing the "market" where slaves are sold. Their highest "value": $ 50 for the scalp of an adult Indian.

It's time to understand that the world has not ended the war against Nazism, destroying people for the good of a handful of enemies of the human race.

Russophobia is not just a battle against our people. This is a war against people who know what conscience, honor and human dignity are.

And I would like to end this letter with poems by F.I. Tyutchev:

"Wasted labor - no, you can't understand them,
The more liberal, the more vulgar,
Civilization is a fetish for them,
But their idea is not available to them.
As you bow down before her, gentlemen,
You do not get recognition from Europe:
In her eyes, you will always
Not servants of enlightenment, but slaves. "

Written in May 1867. But it is said as if today.

But at that time Europe was not yet an occupied peninsula.
65 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    10 March 2021 05: 22
    Verbal diarrhea, honestly ... stop
    1. +8
      10 March 2021 05: 39
      Quote: GTYCBJYTH2021
      Verbal diarrhea, honestly .....

      Roughly worded, but essentially true! This is how it is illogical to exhibit it on VO, big questions arise for the graduates!
      1. -15
        10 March 2021 09: 04
        Do you need performance characteristics of new missiles? or the exact time of the retaliatory strike? signed by all members of the RF Security Council. in the latest edition. taking into account the new radar.
        free chatting on the open site makes it easier to understand inflation trends in India and Portugal. but about the activities of the Ministry of Defense and other "siloviks" of the Russian Federation - it's not like from here everywhere
    2. +26
      10 March 2021 05: 39
      This is your diarrhea.

      Russophobia is not just a battle against our people. This is a war against people who know what conscience, honor and human dignity are.

      I completely agree with the author ... on VO there are outright Russophobes who hate the Russians and the Russian people in the truest sense of the word ... and are trying in every possible way to humiliate the dignity of the Russian person.
      1. +17
        10 March 2021 06: 03
        I reread it again .... But the author is right!
        You need to read more carefully and grasp the essence!
      2. +5
        10 March 2021 06: 26
        It's about the content of the article. More precisely, what this person is trying to convey. Honestly, I thought Shpakovsky was writing. He is ready to blame the Soviet. And this scientist mixed everything together.
        1. +5
          10 March 2021 07: 07
          An anti-Soviet is always a Russophobe. This is an axiom. It is clear what the author said. Oh, the language of Aesop, you are inaccessible to small minds, but you burn with attack in the soul of those who understand.
          1. +1
            10 March 2021 09: 33
            Quote: Civil
            The anti-Soviet is always Russophobe.

            Why though? The Soviet Union has always put the ideas of internationalism over individual national ones. If you pay attention, you will easily see that there was never a Russian republic in the USSR, just as there is no Russian republic as well. So that your axiom is "exaggerated", i.e. you have made your personal opinion an axiom, and this topic is controversial. Something like this. wink
            1. -1
              13 March 2021 09: 08
              But what about the famous toast of Comrade Stalin in honor of the Russian people on the day of the victory parade?
              1. 0
                13 March 2021 09: 40
                Quote: Kaman
                But what about the famous toast of Comrade Stalin in honor of the Russian people on the day of the victory parade

                Duc. to say it does not mean to do it or to think so. Then yourself ...
          2. 0
            10 March 2021 13: 52
            Quote: Civil
            but you burn with napalom

            laughing
            burning ...
            attack ...
            Quote: Civil
            Oh, the tongue of Aesop

            Oh, the language of Chekhov!
            How are you being raped ...
        2. +3
          10 March 2021 09: 03
          Quote: 210ox
          It's about the content of the article.

          The article is not finished, so it is difficult to understand its ultimate goal. I look forward to continuing. But it's a good start. Although, the author, why is hiding (?), Can continue to upset and please.
      3. +6
        10 March 2021 06: 51
        I also read the first thought "It's good that I was taught in the Soviet school" History, Russian and foreign literature. In any case, I don't feel like a fool.
      4. +7
        10 March 2021 10: 45
        I would say thank you very much to the author. Someone may want specifics in the text - so that there are clear recommendations, price indicators, and so on, chewed up and spelled out. There is specificity in the text, but, as always, a certain mindset and level of culture are needed for its perception. With this, alas, recent years have somehow become weaker and weaker. Who remembers Tyutchev now?
        And I still remember how in the spring they dug vegetable gardens - all together, both for myself and for a neighbor, how they did not make differences in the shape of the eyes and the shape of their noses, how they borrowed money until payday, how they celebrated the holidays with families, how there were photographs in every house those killed in the war ... Disunity, general suspicion, general envy - these are the signs of the present time. And education - yes, it has become purely utilitarian, and the teacher has changed from an educator to a provider of "educational services." Sorry for the confusion, the author said more, more accurate and better.
      5. -2
        13 March 2021 09: 07
        Lyokha, there is such a thing ... either freedom of expression with free criticism of Ukraine, the United States and yes, Russia ... or a branch of the newspaper Pravda from Soviet times. I don't know how old you are, but in Soviet times they were forced to subscribe to the newspaper Pravda, no one voluntarily did it. Think about it at your leisure (if you can)
    3. 0
      10 March 2021 07: 44
      Is it really an honor for you to be a stupid or a stinker?
  2. +3
    10 March 2021 05: 37
    Hmm ... "Zone" in the photo and in the text somehow do not correspond to each other ... Okay, before drawing conclusions, we will wait for the next letters. Yes
  3. +8
    10 March 2021 05: 44
    The door handle with the red zone sticker clicked

    Long thought, looking at the photo, what "red zone" we are talking about. My first thought is something related to the penal system. Realized that the author had fallen ill with something and ended up in a hospital ward. Well, you, the administration, and jokes ...

    I will not comment on the text of the article itself. If the specified author is a professor of the department "Finance, money circulation and credit" of the Academy of National Economy under the Government of the Russian Federation AM Matlin, then Anatoly Mikhailovich is recovering. Age already over 80 with a big ponytail ...
    1. +8
      10 March 2021 05: 49
      Long thought, looking at the photo, what "red zone" we are talking about.

      Well, you must ... but without thinking, I immediately understood what the author had in mind ...
      Russia is now in the captivity of liberalism, and the camera in the photo is a camera of liberal reforms into which Russia was driven.
      1. -21
        10 March 2021 06: 02
        [quote = Lech from Android.] [quote] I thought for a long time, looking at the photo, what kind of "red zone" we are talking about. [/ quote]
        Well, you must ... but without thinking, I immediately understood what the author had in mind ...
        Russia is now in captivity of liberalism, and the camera in the photo is a camera of liberal reforms into which Russia was driven. [/ Quote]
        [quote = Lech from Android.] This is your diarrhea.


        Are you also one of the scoundrels? Take chloramphenicol 3 times a day ... If you are a Yeltsinist, then eat Smecta and other telemedicine ... hi
      2. +3
        10 March 2021 06: 03
        but I, without thinking, immediately understood what the author had in mind ...
      3. -19
        10 March 2021 06: 08
        Quote: Lech from Android.
        Russia is now in captivity of liberalism,

        Not in captivity ... but a conscious choice, a return to basics.
  4. +9
    10 March 2021 05: 45
    The article, to put it mildly, did not go.
    I remembered the lines of the classic - "Everything was confused in the Oblonskys' house."
    I personally did not understand what the author wanted to say.
    Recently, there have been many articles on VO that do not have an introductory part explaining the issue being disclosed. The author believes that the reader has prepared in advance for this opus and there is no need to write an introduction. It seems that before that there was already another article, which was cut off in mid-sentence and a new article began.
  5. +5
    10 March 2021 06: 00
    It is very soulfully written for thinking people. Not for those who like to read only headlines and stick ideological labels.
    To the author - to preserve honor, dignity and fortitude.
  6. +7
    10 March 2021 06: 45
    With all due respect to the author-professor, but the confusion could be formulated with a couple (one) sentences, the essence of which is that the author does not agree with the policy pursued by the West and does not support pro-Westerners in Russia.
    1. +1
      10 March 2021 09: 40
      Quote: rotmistr60
      With all due respect to the author-professor, but the confusion could be formulated with a couple (one) sentences, the essence of which is that the author does not agree with the policy pursued by the West and does not support pro-Westerners in Russia.

      The impression of the article - the author throughout his life wrote down the thoughts that came into his head in a notebook (notebook), and now he has published it, but in the process of publication the page numbering has been lost, hence some confusion of everything and everyone.
  7. nnm
    +6
    10 March 2021 06: 51
    Quite an interesting article. According to his message, which gives the feeling that the author is looking back at his life and making his own conclusions. Yes, personal experience cannot be a scientific basis, but this in no way disavows its value, like any human life.
    So, in order:
    - everything is rightly said - it is better to do and even make mistakes than to do nothing. Yes, often any, even the most stable system seems unchangeable only up to the first WORD and the first step towards changing it. And it is in our power, we just need to find the strength to make this decision, this step.
    - it is not so important whether these words were said by Nevsky, for we know about them from a much later Nikon chronicle, but what is important is that for many years they became the inner core of the country and the people.
    - but one can argue for a long time about the presence of truth in Soviet education. What truth can we say if any textbook, scientific work necessarily began with a quote from the next secretary general, or congress. The strength of the Soviet education system was precisely in its consistency, multilevel, universality, and most importantly, in its accessibility and free of charge. And what the respected author writes about is the power of education. Through the same Timurovites, Octobrists. Education, instilling values ​​starting with the family, continuing at school and so on at every stage of a person's life. It was the most important moral principles that were instilled at all its stages.
    - Russophobia began to flourish widely back in the time of Ivan the Terrible, but this did not prevent the country from breaking through this wall with its actions in 1812, after 1917, after 1945. You just have to not try to make excuses, but by adopting everything valuable from the world, adapt it for yourself and go forward.
    - Yes, Europe was not yet occupied, but it was itself an empire over which the sun never set. And it was still hindered by only one country on the continent, therefore nothing has changed from whether it is now possible to talk about the sovereignty of Europe. For us, this will not change anything at all. As we were superfluous for them, incomprehensible, "people with dog heads", so they remained the same.
    - and separately, to the author with best wishes - dum spiro, spero.
    1. +2
      10 March 2021 07: 40
      Your comment is more than an article. A question to the author, what's in the * red * zone ** smartphones ** in * mode *?
      1. +6
        10 March 2021 08: 22
        I have a feeling that many simply do not want to show that the article did not come through, but fearing that they will be considered not wise, they nod "and I understood everything right away! ..."
        As for me - "the king is naked." That is, the article is hard to read and hard to understand. A set of words, richly interspersed with historical and current patriotic slogans from which one can only understand that the author is not satisfied with the education system. All. And there was nothing to fence in the garden.
        1. 0
          10 March 2021 11: 22
          Quote: Leader of the Redskins
          That is, the article is hard to read and hard to understand.

          Just scraps of emotion piled up in a heap. But the thought attracted attention -
          Again, the "market people" offer us, under the guise of a "Russian" education system, focused on the "labor market". Our peoples already know how they understand the "market". To deceive, under the guise of a quality product, slip a surrogate, and even make fun of suckers. Steal someone else's under the sauce of privatization.

          At the same time, the European "Protestant work ethic" has been promoting and developing for several centuries quite decent entrepreneurs and the attitude towards them on the part of society. Those who served in the GSVG will confirm that early in the morning on the street in Germany in front of the store they can unload the goods and leave them to wait for the opening of the store without security. And even our soldiers, taught by the "old men", could take from there, for example, a bottle of milk, but it was necessary to leave money for it instead of a bottle. And this did not cause any complaints from the locals. This is what I mean, general human parity in relationships is not a unique feature of Soviet upbringing. It is also inherent in normal people in the conditions of Western culture. Then what is the author talking about? About the fact that the Germans can build capitalism honestly, and the Russians - necessarily on theft? Here it is - an example of domestic Russophobia of a local spill on the basis of, as the author says, the Soviet system of education and upbringing. I draw a conclusion that the time in the red zone was not spent productively, the Marxian theory of historical materialism is not reflected.
          1. SIT
            0
            13 March 2021 14: 02
            In 1985 we were sent to help collective farmers in a remote village in the Arkhangelsk region. From there ZIL 157 carried milk to the nearest center of civilization for 12 hours. We settled in a club, and there is no lock at the door. We asked the chairman for the castle. He looked at us so strangely and said - so you rake the door back, everyone will understand that you are not at home. There was not a single castle in this village.
    2. +3
      10 March 2021 09: 47
      Quote: nnm
      - but one can argue for a long time about the presence of truth in Soviet education. What truth can we say if any textbook, scientific work necessarily began with a quote from the next secretary general, or congress.

      I confirm that if in the work on the analysis of financial and economic activities or on the economics and finances of enterprises start with: "In the light of the decisions of the XXV Congress of the CPSU, the Resolution of the Politburo and the Council of Ministers of the USSR, it is necessary to increase profitability and reduce the cost of production", then 5 is provided, and if just write "To increase the profitability of the enterprise, it is necessary to reduce production costs by x%", then the "four" will be. 1983 financial college. wink
  8. +7
    10 March 2021 06: 52
    An interesting "trick" with a photo from editors who, apparently, did not read the article and attached the photo to the wrong topic. Hence the incorrect subconscious perception of the article when reading it initially. Everything in it is written normally.
  9. -1
    10 March 2021 06: 54
    I would like to insert a meme without a penis, I do not understand, but very interesting. A hodgepodge of stubs with no general meaning
  10. -3
    10 March 2021 06: 55
    You can disagree, it looks like an advertising article about the newest masterpiece series on TV with the same name (in the morning they are PR in the news).
  11. 0
    10 March 2021 07: 33
    Liberals are Jews sold out, shameless, but they rely on a stupid senseless crowd, wanting full shelves and Western junk, got junk, .... well, what helped your Poles?
    1. 0
      10 March 2021 08: 09
      Who? B-liberals? People who can think?
      1. -1
        10 March 2021 10: 02
        Anyone who disagrees. With whom or with what - it does not matter. Mouth opened not for urrrya - for the liberals and for the expense.
        Who cares there who disagrees with what? I'm not talking about the fact that there were no liberals in Russia, read it, never))) But this is a separate topic ...
        As well as the article. "Arm yourself!" Wonderful, magnificent, one might say, yes the believers will forgive, divinely .... What, why, from whom, for what ...... On a drum. And yet, personally, I can distinguish between quite a useful film in a cruel era and a real historical character. Which could not quite resemble this radiant image.
        In the USSR, we armed ourselves. Oh, how we armed ourselves ..... But since we did not understand very well what, why, how to use it all and how much we needed, the country somehow ended without any adversary.
        This is not even a confusion in thoughts, it is much worse.
        For especially gifted people, I can note that these noneshnie counts cause no less desire to invite the commandant's platoon, as do the "proletarian" rulers of thought who have died in the Bose)) Because they both smell the same. Alas, due to age, I did not find real predecessors. There are not so many of them after the Second World War ... And those that remained, we have already seen .......
    2. +1
      10 March 2021 08: 24
      Oh, how wrong you are!
  12. +5
    10 March 2021 07: 44
    "We are not slaves, we are not slaves."

    You can evaluate the Soviet education system, Soviet ideology in different ways, but this is WE !!! made us a strong people, a strong country!
    The question is, now, when the fundamental I, my personal interests, my wishlist are instilled, who WE, the Great People, the Great Country, will become as a result of separating each from the common?
    The question is serious, and our prospects are very ... different.
    1. +4
      10 March 2021 09: 20
      Here, Victor, you have grasped the very essence.
      Creators of great things are together. After all, something of great complexity cannot be built one by one. Consumers are each on their own, because if you share, the amount consumed will become less, you will not have enough to reach your norm, which you set yourself.
      But here's the paradox! Pyramids - are they also built by creators? What about slaves? We will have to understand by the creator an ideological person, whose idea is embodied in something really great and worthy. And then history will ascribe the title of creator even to a thoughtless ordinary performer. And if the will of a few is embodied by an evil intent, which takes the form of a huge calamity, misfortune, then how to define it? Well, not great. And then each ordinary participant in the process is assigned the historical role of a destructor, and the descendants say: "And you, what were you doing at that time? Why did you not resist evil?"
      This is a wrong question. We must say this: "Why didn’t he nominate at least one great person from his ranks, so that he would stand against the destructor to death?" And the answer: there were such, they were killed, and their case died out. Because they were terribly far from the people. They did not look for support in him and therefore did not find it. Because, without addressing the people, only pitying them, they sought support for themselves personally, not seeing a co-creator among the people.
      So get up, great ones! We have you. Stand up a few of us many! Stand up and touch the pure strings of our souls so that even the laziest ones will ring out, and a powerful melodic echo will pass through our land, turning into the everlasting sound waves of our great future!
      1. +3
        10 March 2021 09: 42
        Greetings Lyudmila soldier
        Now, there is an attempt to substitute concepts, rules, foundations, and in general, everything, everything that prevents the ruling class from effectively managing the masses ...
        We will leave, those who cannot be remade, those who remember how it was possible, it was different !!! And the younger generation will think in the categories that we can teach them, or those that they are trying to teach!
        SCARY! This fight cannot be lost either.
        We have already lost too much, what will we leave as a legacy to our descendants? And will they be ours, in fact ???
  13. +4
    10 March 2021 07: 46
    Essentially, everything is correct. Of course, it’s a bit heavy written, the name is a red zone ... I thought it was a famous covid. But the author is right, this is also a covid, only at the mental level!
  14. -2
    10 March 2021 07: 54
    I agree with those who consider the article a banal set of words. For all the good versus all the bad, but no specifics. Russophobia is bad, I don’t argue - like other ethnic phobia, you don’t need to be a professor to understand this. And what does the "red zone" have to do with it? You might think there is a prison community here and everyone understands "concepts"
    1. +1
      10 March 2021 08: 20
      Just - * professor *!
  15. +5
    10 March 2021 08: 35
    Everything and about everything, and everything in a heap. 1938 ... Even if the boy who saw the film "Alexander Nevsky" was 7-8 years old, the author took the first step towards the century. As the saying goes: "Insanity grew stronger"
  16. +6
    10 March 2021 08: 45
    It seemed to me that the professor should express thoughts coherently. Problem statement, conclusions.
    If you write an essay, then thesis-argument-thesis-argument.
    And here it was as if the blonde had signed up for nails and now the stream of consciousness has started. Russophobes, Nazis, detractors, enemies.
    You don't need to be a professor to do this. Even Kharaluzhny will play such a "Murka".
    1. +2
      10 March 2021 08: 51
      But now I agree with you!
  17. 0
    10 March 2021 08: 54
    Fighting liberals using the barracks method is useless; here it is necessary to direct the media to smart politics. All the money that is spent on our internal and external information field is of little use. Other countries spend less, but it’s more efficient. This is the first thing to think about.
  18. The comment was deleted.
  19. +1
    10 March 2021 08: 57
    the cognitive dissonance
  20. 0
    10 March 2021 09: 36
    Anatoly Mikhailovich, may the Almighty prolong his years, has a whole thematic channel on Zen. Very entertaining and curious readers will undoubtedly be interesting. hi
    https://zen.yandex.ru/id/5aa5480e9b403cc33a40066d?country_code=ru&lang=en&clid=700&from_page=other_page
  21. -3
    10 March 2021 10: 09
    Interestingly, on what article did this "philosopher" and "patriot" sit down? During my life, I have seen many people who began to repent and reason sensibly in the second year of imprisonment. Only after their release, many of them immediately resumed their "activities".
    1. 0
      10 March 2021 10: 57
      But he did not sit down. This ... "illustrators" tried .... The author just got sick with a crown and ended up in an isolation ward. Medical.
  22. 0
    10 March 2021 13: 22
    The author is trying to lead to something like that, but he proposes to draw conclusions on his own. In relation to the cannibalistic "Western" civilization - credit. In relation to the "Soviet education system" - I did not understand - the author believes that it would have been without Soviet power? - It's funny. Especially funny, considering that the professor writes about the path "from first graders." Was this zemstvo school? Or 3 classes of a parish school? Because the education system provided knowledge of world and national culture, it never ceased to be Soviet, in other words, Ours.
  23. -2
    10 March 2021 13: 47
    Now I know there are "red zones" in clinics for the mentally ill.
    1. -1
      10 March 2021 16: 24
      Quote: Paragraph Epitafievich Y.
      Now I know there are "red zones" in clinics for the mentally ill.


      Umishko needs to be developed. You missed the allegory.
      I also lived in the "red zone" for 36 years - the best years.
      1. -2
        10 March 2021 16: 52
        Quote: chenia
        Umishko needs to be developed

        Sorry, I'm not particularly interested in your plans for dealing with dementia. hi
        1. -2
          10 March 2021 17: 02
          Quote: Paragraph Epitafievich Y.
          Sorry


          I accept.
          Remembered Zhvanetsky - "For some, you need to repeat twice, and pause"
          And for the gifted - a pause of six months.
          1. -1
            10 March 2021 17: 08
            My dear, you shouldn't wave your IQ in front of me, don't. With this mental exhibitionism, impress the "youth", about whose worthlessness and lack of education geronts like to grovel.
            1. -1
              10 March 2021 17: 25
              Quote: Paragraph Epitafievich Y.
              Kind,


              Darling!
              Don't bark at the author. if you "considered" an article from a photo to it.
              Quote: Paragraph Epitafievich Y.
              I know there are "red zones" in clinics for the mentally ill
  24. +2
    10 March 2021 16: 17
    Letters from the "red zone". The first

    That is what we were missing here - these are letters in the style of the authors of "Echo of Moscow"! sad
  25. +3
    10 March 2021 17: 03
    Quote: DimonSt
    An interesting "trick" with a photo from editors who, apparently, did not read the article and attached the photo to the wrong topic. Hence the incorrect subconscious perception of the article when reading it initially. Everything in it is written normally.

    And where did you get the idea that the editors are "to blame" - maybe the author has such allegories? He, according to him, it is not clear what kind of education he received, but sorry - noble, he probably had a special school in 1938, where they were taught entirely by nobles .... lol
  26. +2
    10 March 2021 18: 00
    Having made my way from first-grader to professor, I could not find the "Soviet" education system.

    Alas, the author, alas. And also a professor. lol
    The Soviet system is when everyone is taught for free, regardless of their social status and the thickness of their parents' wallet. This is when students do not humiliate teachers, and teachers are not busy with meaningless statistical reports, instead of using this time for really learning, and when the authorities do not treat them like this -
    https://novayagazeta.ru/articles/2021/02/10/89136-pinok-tolko-dlya-uchitelya?utm_referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fzen.yandex.com
  27. -1
    11 March 2021 09: 22
    Why can't we put downsides to articles ?! What is this waste bag ?! Who, what, where? Where does this verbal diarrhea come from, who wrote it, when, why, why? The rudeness of the authors of the site in relation to the reader knows no boundaries.
    If you give historical evidence, minimal politeness and the most elementary rules for working with a printed word tell you to make a sidebar explaining where you got it from, who wrote it, where and when it happened. But the local boor wanted to spit on their readers.
    Ugh!
  28. The comment was deleted.
  29. 0
    15 March 2021 21: 03
    How was THAT even missed? The whole brain is fucked up for a week ...