The deadlines for the end of state tests of the "Agriculture" mining system have been announced

38
The deadlines for the end of state tests of the "Agriculture" mining system have been announced

The newest engineering system of remote mining (ISDM) "Agriculture" is at the stage of state tests, which are planned to be completed by the end of this year. This was announced by the executive director of JSC "NPK" Tekhmash "Alexander Kochkin.

ISDM "Agriculture" is at the stage of state tests, which are planned to be completed in 2021

- leads TASS Kochkin's words.



At the end of last year, Rostec announced the completion of preliminary tests and the beginning of deliveries of a new mining system to the troops. Most likely it was about a small batch of vehicles for experimental military operation.

The Agriculture complex resembles the Grad MLRS and also uses 122 mm ammunition. The complex includes a combat vehicle on an eight-wheeled armored chassis "KamAZ", a transport-loading vehicle and transport-launch containers with engineering ammunition. Each combat vehicle is equipped with two blocks for 25 missiles each, it is equipped with a satellite navigation system, a computer and a weather station. This allows you to make adjustments and take into account the effect of weather on the flight of missiles.

The system allows you to quickly create minefields in especially dangerous areas at a distance of 5 to 15 km quickly and according to a given pattern, i.e. any configuration. The system lays a minefield of any complexity, including those with ready-made passages for its troops.

It is noted that the newest mining system was tested during last year's Kavkaz-2020 exercises, where it showed the need to supply the complex to the Russian army.
38 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +15
    4 March 2021 07: 55
    The latest engineering system of remote mining (ISDM) "Agriculture"

    know how to come up with an original name with meaning laughing As well as "Solntsepek" at TOS
    1. +5
      4 March 2021 08: 21
      In / in Ukraine they sell land to anyone, and we will help them someday with the device of proper farming! Especially in the east. Yes, and in the borderland of the Crimea with Ukraine may come in handy soon.
      Now, if SP2 is launched, no one will need the torus of the Ukrainian gas transportation system.
      There will be a reason to "de-gas" it, but when the gas flow through Ukraine stops, some comrades will have nothing to lose there, their wealth from milking the state will sharply decrease, they will begin to withdraw their accumulated assets offshore and abroad, sell their property and flee.
      This is fraught with tough provocations on the line of contact with the LPR and Crimea.
      And this can lead to the final solution of the Ukrainian question.
    2. -1
      4 March 2021 11: 17
      Quote: Ka-52
      The latest engineering system of remote mining (ISDM) "Agriculture"

      they know how to come up with an original name with meaning laughing As well as "Solntsepek" at TOS

      =======
      What about Pinocchio? lol Where is the "deep, hidden" meaning? bully
      1. +3
        4 March 2021 11: 46
        What about Pinocchio? lol Where is the "deep, hidden" meaning? bully

        otvaltuzit overseas Karabas Barabas without getting off Malvina laughing
        1. +1
          4 March 2021 15: 30
          Quote: Ka-52
          otvaltuzit overseas Karabas Barabas without getting off Malvina

          =======
          good "Justified ... But the most obscene! ..."(from the" bearded "anecdote" Can the soul be separated from the body? "). drinks
  2. +6
    4 March 2021 08: 06
    The deadlines for the end of state tests of the "Agriculture" mining system have been announced
    That's really "humorists farmers" .... however, "thin" army humor.
    Although this is certainly not a joke.
    1. +7
      4 March 2021 09: 12
      All our systems and weapons have very original and accurate names ... Yes
      1. +3
        4 March 2021 09: 52
        So we have through the stage of all kinds of KVN and other funny and resourceful clubs, many passed !!! And this is FOREVER!
        1. +3
          4 March 2021 09: 56
          This is a serious and meaningful message to all our partners ...
          1. +2
            4 March 2021 10: 25
            In the sphere of weapons, empty messages are avoided, at least those who have brains!
            1. +4
              4 March 2021 10: 29
              Those who do not understand our humor, these are their problems ...
  3. -12
    4 March 2021 08: 14
    They continue to fence the zoo from different MLRS.
    This undershoot completely duplicates what has been in service for a long time.
    Well, except that the range is smaller.
    And in a couple of years we will hear about the modernization with an increase in the range, with the expansion of the range of warheads .... and again the same Grad will turn out one to one.
    1. +1
      4 March 2021 08: 26
      Why NEDOgrad? As for me, it will be so abruptly hail. There are a lot of smart filling. More ammunition.
      1. -7
        4 March 2021 08: 33
        Quote: garri-lin
        Why NEDOgrad? As for me, it will be so abruptly hail.

        What is cooler?
        In fact, the same shells from the Grad, only shortened. Accordingly, the range is shorter. But it is lighter, so more trunks were loaded onto one machine.
        And transferred from artillery to engineering units.
        The same story has already happened with TOS / Buratino.
        1. 0
          4 March 2021 09: 20
          Where does the infa about shortened shells come from? The guides seem to be even longer.
        2. 0
          4 March 2021 09: 24
          I beg your pardon, but is it a mine and a projectile from the "hail" or charges from TOS / Buratino are the same thing? As for me, there is a difference ... and a fundamental one.
          1. 0
            4 March 2021 10: 43
            What is the fundamental difference between the MLRS Grad thermobaric projectile and the Buratino MLRS thermobaric projectile?
            What is the fundamental difference between the Grada 3M16 missile with antipersonnel mines or 9M28K with anti-tank mines from the same ISDM "Agriculture".
            So what's the fundamental difference?
            1. -1
              4 March 2021 14: 16
              And what, they all work immediately after the launch, having reached a given place? Then it is already not a mine.
              1. 0
                4 March 2021 14: 22
                According to the UN Ottawa Convention, the term "mine" has the following definition: ammunition intended to be installed underground, on the ground or near the surface of the earth or other surface and for an explosion from the presence, proximity or direct impact of a person or a moving vehicle.
              2. 0
                4 March 2021 14: 29
                What are you talking about?
              3. 0
                5 March 2021 04: 27
                Quote: gurzuf
                And what, they all work immediately after the launch, having reached a given place? Then it is already not a mine.

                If you had bothered to search for details, you would not have asked stupid questions. You don't even need to search for anything, just type in the names of the shells that they wrote to you in the search.
    2. -2
      4 March 2021 08: 27
      Why undergrad? In a way, it is superior to him. It uses shells of the same caliber, it is quite possible that the shells for mining are the same as those of the Grad, but it has a dozen more barrels.
      And so what's the difference what kind of missiles to equip.
      So you are right. It is not clear why so many different vehicles go to the troops or go, which in principle duplicate each other.
      Take TOC missiles of the same caliber with the Hurricane SRZO and are most likely interchangeable. It is clear that Hurricanes cannot be placed close to the front line, but in principle they are of the same type, the same Grad and Agriculture.
      1. 0
        4 March 2021 09: 26
        Is there a difference between a finger and that of a man in his pants?
    3. +4
      4 March 2021 08: 32
      This is the machine of engineers, not of gunners. PTM-3/4, POM-3.
      Roughly 1 RS - 3 PTMs, one car - 75 minutes = 80x60 / 100 meters will close.
  4. +4
    4 March 2021 08: 19
    "... And in an open field, the" Agriculture "system,
    and where to get the rhyme, I came up with a week ...
    Rastorguev. (nearly)
    1. +2
      4 March 2021 14: 55
      "And in the open field the system" Agriculture ", our enemy fell into a daze (censorship)"
      The Russian language is rich! soldier
  5. 0
    4 March 2021 08: 23
    We do not plow or sow, we manage the farmer.
    1. +1
      4 March 2021 11: 17
      Quote: Vadim Ananyin
      We do not plow or sow, we manage the farmer.

      This is just about that famous anecdote about the "peaceful Russian row-crop tractor" ...
  6. +4
    4 March 2021 08: 26
    However, humorists work in our design bureaus. Well done boys. And the quality matches the name. good
  7. +3
    4 March 2021 09: 11
    The deadlines for the end of state tests of the "Agriculture" mining system have been announced


    I will repeat myself and will not stop admiring our names for all kinds of systems and weapons ... good
  8. +1
    4 March 2021 09: 49
    the latest mining system
    "Agriculture" - "that's not it for you" good
  9. +2
    4 March 2021 09: 52
    It is worth noting that this is a technique for defense, not an offensive and seizure of territories. God forbid, these machines will not have to be used, so with the clearance of already instructed problems.
  10. 0
    4 March 2021 10: 00
    Quote: Ruslan Sulima
    It is worth noting that this is a technique for defense, not an offensive and seizure of territories. God forbid, these machines will not have to be used, so with the clearance of already instructed problems.

    Why not? When your forces attack, you can always create a minefield, for example, on one of the flanks or directions of the enemy's possible counterattack.

    The mines used in such systems are much more correct to use, there are no problems with the clearance of minefields set remotely, you just need to "show patience"
  11. 0
    4 March 2021 10: 15
    According to our combat manuals, there must be a mobile obstacle detachment. Since sappers with manual planting of mines in modern mobile war do not have time to block dangerous directions, in the 80s they began to use helicopters for mining. Now they decided that helicopters are expensive, and made remote mining machines. The idea is good, cheaper than helicopters, in terms of efficiency no worse. The name came up accordingly.
    One thing is straining, in the United States this concept is several decades old, and they have had such a weapon for a long time. Are we again going our own way, or do we lack money, or is military science lagging behind?
    1. +2
      4 March 2021 11: 26
      Quote: glory1974
      in the United States, this concept is several decades old, and they have had such a weapon for a long time. Are we again going our own way, or do we lack money, or is military science lagging behind?

      We have also had such systems for a long time. In the 80s mentioned, there were definitely MLRS with cluster warheads equipped with mines. I remember exactly, because in practice I walked around the landfill and collected them.
      1. +2
        4 March 2021 17: 23
        Quote: Jacket in stock
        cluster warheads equipped with mines. I remember exactly, because I myself, in practice, on the landfill went to collect them.
        -Mines ???however, your commanders were evil ..
        lol lol
        1. 0
          5 March 2021 04: 32
          Quote: your1970
          Mines ??? evil commanders, however, were.

          No, not the commanders. Teachers. It was at the institute.
          And I returned from the range alive just thanks to the "evil teacher" who managed to hit me in time on the playful little hands when I reached for the rocket engine without being grounded. The mines were practical, for testing, but the fuel in the engine was real.
  12. 0
    5 March 2021 16: 59
    The system lays a minefield of any complexity, including those with ready-made passages for its troops.

    I think the question of which nation is the kindest of the NATO countries is no longer worth it ...