In "Ukroboronprom": Tanks "Oplot" in a number of performance characteristics are among the best in the world

Ukraine cannot decide on the supply tanks T-84BM "Oplot" in the Armed Forces of Ukraine. So far, we are not talking about the specific timing of the delivery of these MBTs, but about the expectations expressed by both the manufacturer and the Ministry of Defense.

According to the general director of Ukroboronprom Yuriy Gusev, the concern he heads "is awaiting approval of the state defense order for 2021."

Gusev:

It is possible that Oplot tanks will also appear in this order. At least we hope so. Tanks "Oplot" for a number of performance characteristics (tactical and technical characteristics) are among the best in the world. And such tanks should be in our armed forces.

At the same time, Yuri Gusev did not specify what kind of tactical and technical characteristics that would allow Ukrainian tanks to be among the "best in the world" are being discussed.

The general director of "Ukroboronprom" announced that the number of T-84BM "Oplot" tanks that should have been supplied to the tank units of the Armed Forces of Ukraine should be determined by the general staff.

These statements were made against the background of the transfer of five updated T-72 tanks (T-72AMT). From an ordinary event in Ukraine, they made a whole ceremony, in which phrases about "a gradual transition to NATO standards" were again sounded out of place. These statements were ridiculed by ordinary Ukrainian users, pointing out that "apparently, for a long time, Ukrainian officials will speak against the background of Soviet-style equipment and declare NATO standards."

For reference: MBT T-84BM "Oplot" has a mass of about 51 tons. Crew of 3 people. The main armament is a 125 mm smoothbore cannon. Cannon ammunition - up to 48 shells and ATGM. The tank is equipped with active protection "Warta". The tank is produced by the Kharkov plant named after Malyshev.

Comments

[Thrifty]

And, could he say something else? The Natsiks would have let him go to the rags, there, with all their vukriy, they exonerate several tens of thousands of Natsiks who, if desired, can be sent to another world.

[Profiler]

Military review yesterday : An Indian report named the Arjun Mk-1A tank "one of the most advanced tanks of our time"

Military review today : In "Ukroboronprom": Tanks "Oplot" in a number of performance characteristics are among the best in the world

So it ... Can Indians and Ukrainians measure themselves with handles?

And we will stand on the sidelines, watching

[mole]

Quote: Profiler

Military review today : In "Ukroboronprom": Tanks "Oplot" in a number of performance characteristics are among the best in the world

So it ... Can Indians and Ukrainians measure themselves with handles?

And we will stand on the sidelines, watching

Just some studied geography on the globe of Ukraine, others on the globe of India.

[svp67]

Quote: Profiler

Can Indians and Ukrainians measure themselves with handles?

They can do it EASILY if Pakistan and India come together again on the battlefield ...

[Crimean partisan 1974]

Pakistan and India will converge again ... oh well ... don't be ridiculous ... they threw stones at each other with the Xiaoping people and went to the wagons ......... in fact, the most advanced tank of the one who has there is a Negro loader ... and super-advanced if there is a gender Negro-loader ... these are the pies ... neither Arjun nor T-80 have such ... because this is yesterday's age

[Richard]

Quote: Profiler

Military review yesterday: In an Indian report, the Arjun Mk-1A tank is called "one of the most advanced tanks of our time"

Military review today: In "Ukroboronprom": Tanks "Oplot" for a number of performance characteristics are among the best in the world

So this is ... Can Indians and Ukrainians measure themselves with handles?

And we will stand on the sidelines, watching

The question is very important
I propose to Indians and Ukrainians to arrange a dance battle Hopak vs Jimi-Jimi
Whoever wins has the best tank

[Kuroneko]

Quote: Profiler

Military review yesterday: In an Indian report, the Arjun Mk-1A tank is called "one of the most advanced tanks of our time"

Military review today: In "Ukroboronprom": Tanks "Oplot" for a number of performance characteristics are among the best in the world

You have forgotten the Chinese. They also have the best tanks in the world. Well, the United States, essno.

[yehat2]

why are you surprised? This tank is the best in the world in terms of packing volume. Especially dangerous against Muslims from Pakistan. Arjun is resting

[Lipchanin]

Tanks "Oplot" for a number of performance characteristics (tactical and technical characteristics) are among the best in the world.

Well, where did he really show these "outstanding performance characteristics (tactical and technical characteristics)"?
At the training ground?
As always, a solid blbble.
Already to sleep but go to bed without blurt out nonsense and praise themselves

[Uncle lee]

against the background of the transfer of five updated T-72 tanks (T-72AMT).

You really figure out which tank is better ... Otherwise, hot Ukrainian lads (on the tanks) will fight among themselves!

[fruc]

Yuri Gusev:
It is possible that Oplot tanks will also appear in this order. At least we hope so. Tanks "Oplot" for a number of performance characteristics (tactical and technical characteristics) are among the best in the world.
There is nothing to comment, Who would have doubted.

[YOUR]

Indeed, the Oplot tank is a good tank, for the reason that it is the same T-80, but with a 6TD-2E diesel engine. Which they took and called the T-84BM. Oh, and it seems like a somewhat modified tower.
The Soviet-designed engine was put into service in 1985, in fact it is a modification of the 5TDF engine that was on the T-64, unification in terms of details is 76%.
KOEP "Warta" - you can bend your fingers long and hard, tell how this system successfully intercepts ATGM "Tou", the American corrected missiles "Copperhead". Although this is a very big question, where and how they were able to experience it is not mentioned anywhere. The complex actually remains "blind" in relation to the ammunition, which is guided by the laser beam not directly at the tank hull, but slightly above the target.
You can give examples of what is good and what is bad, the main thing is that almost everything Soviet has received Ukrainian designations and is passed off as ultra-modern technology.

[pyagomail.com]

[Quote] [/ quote]
This is true, but, given that the T-80s were produced in the RSFSR, in Ukraine, apparently, are those exported from the GSVG in due time? That is, they do not produce new tanks, but repair and alter them from storage sites? There were problems with the engines: TD-2E, have they been solved? Are they capable of producing T-84s in large quantities?

[YOUR]

Well, you ask questions. How do I know what they are capable of and what they really do.
Engines on T-84 6TD-2E. They were once developed in and produced in Kharkov. Apparently, their deposits are used.

[pyagomail.com]

I ask the questions because I admit that the desperate "harnessing forces" can do something stupid.

[YOUR]

Interesting. For instance?

[pyagomail.com]

Reach the Kuban and Volga with tank wedges (???) But Donbass can be harmed if they are commanded from behind a puddle.

[carstorm 11]

80 UD in Kharkov did. But having sold a handful of buildings to Pakistan, if there is still very little left.

[NDR-791]

Are they capable of producing T-84s in large quantities?
Enough infernal tablet (c). Why a lot? All the same, we gathered for the NATO standard. I'm just thinking when they will announce that Abrashka was cut from the T-80?

[Glory to Berkut]

That is, the head of Ukroboronpron said that Soviet-designed tanks are still the best in the world in a number of performance characteristics? I don’t understand if it was a paramog or zrada?

[YOUR]

So they have no others. In service are - T-64, T-64BM Bulat T-72, T-80, T-84 Oplot.

[mark2]

As always, a solid blbble.
Already to sleep but go to bed without blurt out nonsense and praise themselves

So their teachers are good. Americans. Those, too, blablabla about their own, as the best are constantly mentioned. America is, America is, and the super-duper missiles and democracy are 300 years old.

[Konnick]

Well, where did he really show these "outstanding performance characteristics (tactical and technical characteristics)"?
At the training ground?

And where did our Armata show itself? Ukrainians can use this Stronghold in the Donbass, but it would be better if it weren't, but we tested Armata in Syria, not a single shot, or tried it unsuccessfully, or a fake. As they say every sandpiper ...

[mu1972]

[quote = Lipchanin] [quote] Tanks "Oplot" for a number of performance characteristics (tactical and technical characteristics) are among the best in the world. [/ quote]
Well, where did he really show these "outstanding performance characteristics (tactical and technical characteristics)"?
At the training ground?

on paper!!!

[boris epstein]

It was precisely on a tank derby in Germany that the tamers failed miserably. Seventh place out of eight possible. And this is in greenhouse conditions.

[uralant]

Quote: Lipchanin

Well, where did he really show these "outstanding performance characteristics (tactical and technical characteristics)"?
At the training ground?
As always, a solid blbble.
Already to sleep but go to bed without blurt out nonsense and praise themselves

Well, you're wrong! Ukroboronprom reported about these tests back in the year 17-18. Then the craftsman, theirs, created a program like Wordoftanks and demonstrated on it all the advantages of this machine. Neither the Abrams, let alone the T-90, were any match for her. True, after that, in the NATO battle, concocted to resemble the Russian one, they took the last place. They could not drive up the hill and load the gun, but this is one of the best!

[Izotovp]

Thank you country 404-day started with a good joke.
However, they were not far away from the Indians with their advanced, I don’t know where, however, a tank.

[Andrea]

Hmm ... you can't praise yourself, who will.
And so, yes, the concept of the T-72 can still compete with many tanks in the world in terms of speed characteristics and weapons, and if you hang up various modern hokoryashki, then we get "Oplot".

[Egoza]

Quote: Andrea

You cannot praise yourself, who will.

Yes Yes Yes! We have all the best !!! And tanks, and planes, and boats, which are instead of ships, and the Supreme Zrada, and the President! You won't find SUCH one anywhere else!

[boris epstein]

We will not get the "Stronghold". "Oplot" is a T-84, that is, a T-80 with a horizontally opposed engine instead of a gas turbine. And on the basis of the T-72, Ukraine tried to produce the Bulat tank.

[KCA]

How does the Soviet 125mm cannon fall under NATO standards? Disorder, urgently replace with rifled 105 or smooth 120 and replace Cliff with Browning

[Ugochaves]

There, not only the cannon and the machine gun need to be changed, the tank will have to be changed right away, and the owner commands to take only him ... so only Abrams ... Go to NATO with empty pockets, go ahead

[rocket757]

In "Ukroboronprom": Tanks "Oplot" in a number of performance characteristics are among the best in the world

frogs croaked ... they can answer them in free republics, unless ...

[alexniko77]

spring exacerbation

[prior]

"Tanks "Oplot" in a number of performance characteristics are among the best in the world"

This was clearly demonstrated at the tank biathlon of the NATO countries, where Ukraine took the honorable last place.

[tihonmarine]

Quote: prior

This was clearly demonstrated at the tank biathlon of the NATO countries, where Ukraine took the honorable last place.

If Ukraine was well equipped with weapons, and they could produce "the best in the world," then the question arises to them, "Why then does Ukraine buy old PMs in Estonia, in Latvia" Land Rovers "produced in the 40s of the 20th century, and another God forbid, what is useless to us ??? "

[Uncle lee]

Quote: prior

honorable last place.

And there is no one behind!

[113262a]

Just a good SOVIET tank. Dot! Better seventy-two, but worse than eighty. The rest is details.

[Alien From]

Yesterday the Indians said that their tanks were the best, today the non-brothers climbed into the same steppe ..... they will never remember: the T-72 is the best tank!

[evgen1221]

It was the 25th century, the Great Sumerians continued to persistently promote their best tank Priplod.)))

[tTshka]

Yes, what is there ... the best !!!
Again the bacon fermented the campaign

[tihonmarine]

Quote: tTshka

Again the bacon fermented the campaign

Already "gave a smell", as well as itself okrajna.

[Aleks2048]

I read a funny article and even more funny comments.

From an ordinary event in Ukraine they made a whole ceremony, in which phrases about "a gradual transition to NATO standards" were again sounded out of place. These statements were ridiculed by ordinary Ukrainian users, pointing out that "apparently, for a long time, Ukrainian officials will speak against the background of Soviet-style equipment and declare NATO standards."

For some reason, I remembered about our modern Russian fleet, about which so many articles are published on VO and our Navy is quite happy to be accepted into the fleet or even the announcement of the acceptance of each boat into the fleet, and the press even covers the beginning of certain technological operations.
When I got to the comments, I remembered today's article from VO that Roscosmos allows the creation of a Russian orbital station.
If we compare quantitatively the tank fleet in the Russian Federation and Ukraine, then we immediately see a comparison of the US and Russian fleets. By the way, quantitatively, Ukraine does not need the same number of tanks to protect its territory as for the Russian Federation, just as the Russian Federation is not required for its foreign ambitions of a fleet comparable to the United States. And if you consider that Ukraine openly declares that its friends are NATO, and the main and, in fact, the only enemy of the Russian Federation, then, in general, Ukraine's strategy to reduce the tank fleet in the long term looks more preferable than the strategy of the Russian Federation on the absence of intelligible foreign ambitions and in fact the continuing reduction of the Russian Navy. ...
So, excuse me, but with all the fun in the article and in the comments, an unpleasant residue remains.

[Ugochaves]

Do you understand what the matter is, we are at the very least, with a creak, but we do our own thing ourselves, but what have they done by THEM, with our own hands and brains?

[Alexilyin]

Each sandpiper praises its swamp. Recently I read an article about Indian Arjun. The same song, for the same tune.

[tihonmarine]

Tanks "Oplot" for a number of performance characteristics (tactical and technical characteristics) are among the best in the world. And such tanks should be in our armed forces.

And why, your relatives of the Ukrainian Armed Forces don't buy "the best in the world!" either "Strongholds" or "Kickbacks".

[Vlad Pervovich]

Quote: Lipchanin

Tanks "Oplot" for a number of performance characteristics (tactical and technical characteristics) are among the best in the world.

Well, where did he really show these "outstanding performance characteristics (tactical and technical characteristics)"?
At the training ground?
As always, a solid blbble.
Already to sleep but go to bed without blurt out nonsense and praise themselves

probably the price ...

[Viktor Sergeev]

Well, yes, in terms of the amount of money stolen for the creation of this really rusty (at least the one that was delivered to Asia) miracle, in the cost of working with a file and on laudatory comments on social networks, yes, this tank is a record holder. But to be honest, this is not a separate tank, but simply an alteration from the T80 by painting and replacing equipment.

[Incvizitor]

Maybe the tanks are good, but they were unlucky with the "country", there they have no prospects and will not, everything is again moving towards the Wild Field.
In general, this is an alteration of 80 tons, so it was properly dekkuniziroval.

[Eug]

The question is - do potential buyers think so too? And even if this is so, then this does not negate the need to produce them (Strongholds). And with this, as life has shown, there are sooooo big problems ...

[venik]

From this article:
"....Tanks "Oplot" for a number of performance characteristics (tactical and technical characteristics) are among the best in the world... ... "
-------
From yesterday's article (https://topwar.ru/180327-v-indijskom-reportazhe-tank-arjun-mk-1a-nazvan-odnim-iz-samyh-prodvinutyh-tankov-sovremennosti.html)
"....in the NDTV report, the Arjun Mk-1A was named "one of the most advanced tanks of our time." .... "
========
The "great tank-building powers of our time" continue to create "wunderwaffe" ..... Competition in the market "supertanks" is growing rapidly!

[iouris]

There are not so many tanks "in the world".

[orionvitt]

for a number of performance characteristics are among the best in the world

Exactly. Like the Indian "Arjun". The best in the world, but the T-90 is better.

The tank is produced by the Kharkov plant named after Malyshev.

What, what? What is produced there? And how much has already been done? I remember 8 pieces, and one more cannot be made for the parade. I am generally silent about the overwhelmed Thai order.

[Fitter65]

Tanks "Oplot" for a number of performance characteristics (tactical and technical characteristics) are among the best in the world.

This is according to the general director of Ukroboronprom Yuriy Gusev,

The tank has improved "hunter" abilities. The commander has a panoramic system that provides round-the-clock surveillance with 360-degree coverage. This allows him to detect targets and hit them on his own, or transmit data to the gunner for tracking.

and this is said by the Director of the Center for Research and Development of Combat Vehicles V. Balamurugan, like a comrade from India, but it feels like it's from Ukraine, or vice versa

[Berg berg]

And according to Western experts, the Ukrainian Oplot is the worst tank released in recent years, even those contracts concluded with East and Asia had to be terminated due to a huge number of defects and cracks and the use of spare parts from old recycled T-64 warehouse in the tank.

[vvp2412]

In "Ukroboronprom": Tanks "Oplot" in a number of performance characteristics are among the best in the world

Let the Indians and their Arjun be told about it! :))))

[Andre]

The T-34 will soon begin to be produced. Inexpensive.

[Ros 56]

They will not start, they will not have enough intelligence, nor specialists.

[75 Sergey]

This is the height of perfection, the development of tank building is over, it is better not to come up with it, you did everything you could - keep thinking the same, we support you!

[vodolaz]

And the inflatable boats donated by the Americans are not considered the best destroyers in the fleet?

[Metallurg_2]

Pralna: and the Ukrainian army is one of the strongest in the world :)

[Ros 56]

Good students of striped banderlog are obtained. The striped ones gag like a pack of dogs, and these idiots took an example from them, lie more, maybe someone will believe.

[Thorvlobnor IV]

By the way, the T-84 Yatagan (a derivative of Oplot, but with a 120-mm cannon and a special automatic loader from the tower niche) at one time reached the final of the Turkish tender together with Leopard. The Turks are pretty good guys, and that says something about Oplot's capabilities. The tender, however, was later canceled and the Turks eventually bungled their tank, hell knows what happened in the end.

[zenion]

And if outside the row? Does the tank know the way home when everyone is asleep? Does not know! Better to do it on horse-drawn. Eight smart horsepower all-round tank.

[Tarasios]

Quote: Richard

I propose to Indians and Ukrainians to arrange a dance battle Hopak vs Jimi-Jimyes
Whoever wins has the best tank

Alas, even if Ukrainians and Indians meet on the battlefield / biathlon, nothing concrete will come of it: the Ukrainians will quickly put up a couple of stands and start bragging uncontrollably, talking about their next imaginary overtures; at the same time asking for money and hinting that they have almost entered into an agreement of intent to become candidates for association with the European Union, and the Indians - to dance, find out who is whose brother, lost in childhood, and decorate tanks with flowers. But then the show will be excellent :) I would have watched)))

[Popov I.P.]

The contract for the supply to Thailand of 49 new T-84 Oplot-T tanks and two Atlet armored repair and recovery vehicles based on them was signed on September 1, 2011 with a deadline for completion by the end of 2014. According to the schedule, Ukraine was supposed to ship: December 2012 - five vehicles, August 2013 - 15 vehicles, December 2013 - 15 vehicles, August 2014 - 14 tanks and both ARVs. According to a Thai web resource, the last batch of Ukrainian BM "Oplot-T" tanks was unloaded on July 29, 2018 at the Thai port of Sattahip. Such is the punctual fulfillment of contractual obligations. Even a dozen and a half cars a year is not a feasible task, this despite the fact that the foreign exchange contract and penalties are also paid in currency. The pace of production is good. During the Great Patriotic War, the Chelyabinsk "Tankograd" (it also included some of the evacuated Kharkov factories) produced 18 tanks and self-propelled guns, that is, approximately 000 a year or 4500 vehicles a day. But ukropaganda is screaming at every corner that there is a war going on, where is the mobilization of all forces? There is one of two things: either there is no war or degradation of production. According to Wikipedia, the number of T-12s produced since 2008 is 84, if 50 went to Thailand, then where else is 49? Or is it the copy that is taken to exhibitions and rolled out on the streets of Kharkov on holidays? Although somehow the figure of 1 T-10s allegedly issued for the Armed Forces of Ukraine flashed, there is no confirmation of this. And so - about the best in the world - an obvious overkill, a good tank on a par with a dozen similar in the world, but there is nothing revolutionary.

[TermNachTer]

Yeah, but they just can't get to the front line))) or they are not allowed there on purpose, so that later it would not be excruciatingly painful)))

[Growlers]

Let's figure it out. Ukraine has lost the technology for the production of armored hulls, moreover, it buys armor for its armored car crafts in Poland and Finland. The production of tank guns began to be established in Sumy under the "traitor" Yanukovych and something seemed to work out. Now the story is the same as with the armored hulls, everything is ruined. The radio stations were assembled in Ternopil, but the quality and price ..... The question is, what kind of tank production are we talking about? Collecting from one to ten mid-level vehicles, stuffing them with gadgets purchased in Europe, using the cemeteries of old Soviet tanks - this is the current level of Ukrainian "tank building". The question is, why all this hype and loud statements? Most likely for internal use. the budget cut has not been canceled. The civil war feeds many officials of the "Square" in Europe and even in the United States, both in elegant suits and generals' uniforms.

[APASUS]

Tanks "Oplot" for a number of performance characteristics (tactical and technical characteristics) are among the best in the world.

Interestingly, Americans know?