Military Review

Yavlinsky and his sworn friends

56
Yavlinsky and his sworn friends

The founder and ideological leader of the oldest liberal opposition party with a peculiar name for a political organization, Yabloko, unexpectedly burst into a programmatic article under a very bold and meaningful title "Against Putinism and Populism."


"Yavlinism" versus "Navalnism"


This article, which contained a standard set of political assessments and ideological postulates of the Yabloko party, nevertheless caused a wide response. And extremely harsh criticism, primarily from the "progressive" liberal community in the opposition media and social networks, including those who, as a rule, sympathized with Yavlinsky.

It even caused a split in the Yabloko party itself. Which, until very recently, was the classic personal clientele of Grigory Yavlinsky. Almost in the same way as the LDPR is a long-term clientele of Vladimir Zhirinovsky, and not a full-fledged political party of the European type.

A host of opposition liberal publicists, journalists and bloggers branded Yavlinsky as a political renegade and simply a traitor to the democratic movement.

Thus, MK journalist Alexander Minkin, in an article under the unmatched title "Serial Suicide", wrote about the Yabloko leader that this "suicide" was committed by a political corpse.

And all because in his article G. Yavlinsky explained in detail why he does not share the line of Alexei Navalny and his supporters from the camp of the liberal opposition.

Yavlinsky thoroughly criticized Navalny's chaotic political views, accusing him of nationalism, authoritarian manners and leaderism at the same time. And also in cheap populism, manifested in the incitement of "Bolshevik" social enmity towards wealthy people.

Yavlinsky also condemned the methods of Navalny's team - the organization of unauthorized actions and processions, as well as the involvement of minors in them.

Yavlinsky shows quite convincingly how Navalny and his team manipulate their supporters, citing a fake film about "Putin's palace" as an example.

The Yabloko leader states:

"This is all selling emotions in line with consumer advertising technology."

According to the author, Navalny and Russia's democratic development are completely incompatible.

“Democratic Russia, respect for man, freedom, life without fear and repression are incompatible with Navalny's policy.

These are fundamentally different directions. "

- sums up his reflections Grigory Yavlinsky.

Since at the dawn of his political activity Navalny was an activist of the Yabloko party and was expelled from it for “nationalism”, it is obvious that between these two opposition politicians

"The black cat ran for a long time."

Moreover, in the next article "Keep quiet - you will fall into the executioners", where Yavlinsky, responding to numerous accusations of political apostasy, argues that

"The philosophy of these social protests is Nietzscheanism and National Socialism."

A particular piquancy of the situation consisted in the fact that at the time of the publication of these articles, there are trials over Alexei Navalny. And he was already sentenced to a real prison term.

In this demarche of Yavlinsky, his former friends from the liberal camp saw not only a morally questionable act (it is ugly to blame a political opponent under arrest for all mortal sins), but also a clear message towards the Kremlin.

In short,

Grigory Alekseevich sold himself to Putin with "guts"

- such is the conclusion of his numerous chorus of critics and accusers.

I sold for "three percent"

- according to the liberal publicist Sergei Parkhomenko.

As you know, for a political party to receive state funding from the budget, it must gain at least three percent in the parliamentary elections. And to get into parliament and create a faction there - five.

At the same time, the authors of this criticism seem to completely ignore not only the harsh criticism of the policy of Vladimir Putin contained in this article, but also the completely unambiguous assessments of his political regime as anti-democratic, dictatorial and repressive. Which can hardly prompt the authorities to admit Yabloko (which includes such radical opponents of the regime as Lev Schlosberg from Pskov) into the State Duma.

The same Schlosberg, who actively participated in rallies in support of Navalny and called for the removal of the president from power, completely dissociated himself from Yavlinsky's position, stating that this was just his private opinion, and not the position of the entire party.

The formal chairman of the party, Rybakov, spoke in defense of the leader.

But this is unlikely to save the party, if not from a split (its opponents have nowhere to go), then from a serious political crisis, fraught with its collapse.

Since, not being formally the head of the party, its founder provides support under his own name from a number of influential businessmen. The fall of Yavlinsky's authority may put an end to the existence of the oldest liberal party in modern Russia, as such.

Message to Biden


However, the embittered critics did not seem to understand the main point of Yavlinsky's plan.

His article is, of course, a message.

But not the Kremlin, but rather the White House. And not to Moscow, but to Washington.

Obviously, this article was prepared by the author in connection with Biden's victory in the US presidential election. And it was addressed to the American Democrats. In order to show that in Russia there is their real ally and like-minded person who must be supported.

The fact is that earlier Grigory Yavlinsky published a whole series of articles, where he criticized the policies of Donald Trump, Vladimir Putin, Recep Erdogan as dangerous authoritarian populists. And he declared his full sympathy for the US Democratic Party.

Since the fight against white racism in the United States was one of the "skates" of the Democrats' election strategy, Navalny's assessments as a nationalist and xenophobe should serve as a lethal argument for Biden's team.

In order to show the collective West that it is Yabloko that is defending “European values” in Russia, Yavlinsky in his article strongly condemns the “annexation of Crimea” and the outbreak of war in Donbas.

Unlike Navalny, whose statements on the Crimea issue were clearly ambiguous.

It is known that when asked whether Crimea should be given back to Ukraine, he replied that this is not a sandwich that can be given to someone.

On the other hand, the same Navalny talked about the possibility of holding a second referendum in Crimea.

Yavlinsky's position on this issue (in contrast to Navalny's) is completely unambiguous:

"Russia is to blame for everything."

And this also confirms the version that this article is a clear message to Biden and not to the Kremlin, since for Vladimir Putin the issue of the Russian jurisdiction of Crimea is absolutely fundamental.

And the assumption that Yavlinsky deliberately wanted to "drown" Navalny does not hold water. Because he is not being tried for political extremism.

Yavlinsky's calculation seems to be perfectly correct in theory. Navalny (with his anti-emigrant rhetoric) clearly does not fit into the ideological trends of the victorious American Democrats.

At the same time, Grigory Alekseevich, it seems to us, made one significant mistake.

The stake on the support of Alexei Navalny (as the main fighter against the Putin regime) has been made in the West (both in the United States and the EU, and in its political center - Germany) for a long time.

It is hard to believe that they didn’t know who they were dealing with when they made this choice.

Yavlinsky's calculation that America will no longer support right-wing populists with Trump's departure may be true for the situation in Poland, where the Kaczynski brothers' right-wing and nationalist Law and Justice Party enjoyed particular support from the Republican administration.

In Russia, where Navalny (and his FBK) acts as a non-partisan exposer of corruption in the highest echelons of power, this is the most profitable strategy to discredit the Kremlin. And his political past (participation in nationalist marches) can hardly serve as some kind of serious accusation.

On the contrary, it allows attracting additional supporters. In addition, the use of the standard accusation of corruption was frequently used in a number of orange revolutions. As, for example, in Egypt against President Hosni Mubarak.

However, later it turned out that most of the charges were simply fabricated for political purposes by his opponents.

And here I cannot but share my personal memories.

Nemtsov's order - write on the fences


Sometime during the premiership of Yevgeny Primakov, I happened to be present at the president-hotel in Moscow at an event of the Belarusian opposition and Russian right-wing liberals, who were unexpectedly removed from power at that time.

They discussed methods of fighting the "dad".

And over a glass of wine, Boris Nemtsov began to explain to his Belarusian friends that they were acting completely wrong, accusing Lukashenka of clamping down on democracy.

"So you will never overthrow him."

- said Nemtsov. -

“The people don't care about your democracy.

We must act differently.

Accuse him of corruption, that he stole millions!

And the people will follow you. "

The Belarusian oppositionist was very puzzled.

"So you need proof, right?"

He remarked uncertainly.

"What for?"

- Boris Efimovich exclaimed with surprise. -

"Write on the fences - Luke is a thief!"

Therefore, most likely, the hopes of the founder of Yabloko that in connection with Navalny's landing in the White House they will stake on his party are hardly justified.

There, apparently, he will not be forgiven for the destruction of the emerging broad liberal coalition in support of Navalny.

After all, during the Ukrainian Maidan, the active participation of ultranationalists and neo-fascists from the Svoboda party did not in any way alienate Western leaders from supporting the coup and overthrowing the moderate centrist Yanukovych?

But the Yabloko party did not condemn Ukrainian nationalists either?

At the same time, there is only one plus for Yavlinsky in this difficult situation for him (as a politician).

He showed to his few, but ideologically verified supporters that for him liberal values ​​are more important than momentary political tactics.

In general, as the Stalinist Nina Andreeva wrote in her time in the newspaper "Soviet Russia":

"I cannot compromise my principles."

It seems that Grigory Yavlinsky sincerely thinks so.
Author:
56 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. NDR-791
    NDR-791 15 February 2021 10: 03
    -2
    Grigory Alekseevich sold himself to Putin with "guts"
    They are all in the Duma and who did not get there for a long time sold and spent on drink.
    1. Boris55
      Boris55 15 February 2021 10: 06
      -6
      Quote: NDR-791
      They are all in thought and who did not get there

      Do you know another way to run the state? Name.

      The apple is not much different from other puppets melted by the West in our political arena.
      1. NDR-791
        NDR-791 15 February 2021 10: 13
        +8
        Do you know another way to run the state?
        And you know ... and not even one. Why shake the air? The management method available to us for our country is completely inappropriate. It's just a feeder for not the best representatives of the people.
        The apple is not much different from other puppets melted by the West in our political arena.
        And I completely agree with this. hi
        1. Nikon OConor
          Nikon OConor 15 February 2021 19: 45
          -1
          And you know ... and not even one

          Socialism, Monarchy ...
          IMHO the monarchy, the king himself and his children will not steal ... A good king .... I))
      2. Svarog
        Svarog 15 February 2021 10: 26
        +13
        Quote: Boris55

        Do you know another way to run the state? Name.

        For some reason, we copy all methods from the west. Well, with the exception of the Soviet period ... although that system was not effective either. It's time to come up with and implement your own management model.
        Is that why we need senators? What are they doing, besides eating budget money ... and now for life as well? And the Duma .. does it reflect the opinion of the people in fact? Useless organs in my opinion.
        1. Boris55
          Boris55 15 February 2021 11: 07
          +1
          Quote: Svarog
          Is that why we need senators? What are they doing, besides eating budget money ... and now for life? And the Duma .. does it reflect the opinion of the people in fact?

          If you initially think that power is built for the people, then such misunderstandings take place. Try to look at it from a different angle and it will become clear to you what they are doing in the Federation Council and the Duma:

          "State policy and management in a crowd-" elite "society is an agreement reached on the capabilities of various clan-corporate groupings in using the state structure and system to achieve their narrowly corporate goals."

          According to Karl Marx, the state is the apparatus of violence of the minority over the majority, but the state is also a system of people's survival. When the balance between these two concepts is in harmony, then everything is calm in the state - the wolves are fed and the sheep are safe. The task of any president is to maintain this balance, to preserve the country.
          1. qQQQ
            qQQQ 15 February 2021 11: 42
            -2
            Quote: Boris55
            "State policy and management in a crowd-" elite "society is an agreement reached on the capabilities of various clan-corporate groupings in using the state structure and system to achieve their narrowly corporate goals."

            Now "witnesses of democracy" will run up and throw minuses.
        2. Ross xnumx
          Ross xnumx 15 February 2021 11: 58
          +3
          Quote: Svarog
          Is that why we need senators? What are they doing, besides eating budget money ... and now for life as well? And the Duma .. does it reflect the opinion of the people in fact? Useless organs in my opinion.

          What are you? To strike at the "sacred"? To paraphrase a famous saying, we can say:
          "Russians without SovFed and State Duma - what a tree without a caterpillar!"
          And here is another gem from the "people's choices":
        3. Nyrobsky
          Nyrobsky 15 February 2021 13: 48
          +9
          Quote: Svarog
          It's time to come up with and implement your own management model.
          Is that why we need senators? What are they doing, besides eating budget money ... and now for life as well? And the Duma .. does it reflect the opinion of the people in fact? Useless organs in my opinion.

          That rare case when I completely agree with you, especially considering the fact that there are critically few people in the Federation Council and the Duma who have gone from being a "hard worker" from the ground (workshop, mine face,), or from junior management positions ( flight leader, foreman, foreman) and seriously imagine the needs of the people. Singers, artists, athletes, professional party opportunists, businessmen, etc. who hardly imagine what public transport is, or what bills of 50-100 rubles look like, not to mention "full-weight" coins in denominations of 10-50 kopecks. They should not be dismissed for vacations, but annually scattered in small beads to the most distant settlements with an amount equal to the minimum wage, so that they, with their "Duma experience", plunge into the life of the people and help debug it.
        4. syndicalist
          syndicalist 16 February 2021 17: 41
          +4
          I’m even curious if there was at least one deputy in the modern history of Russia who would have read (no, not developed, but only read) at least one law for which he voted. There are definitely no such convocations from the last convocations. 100% sure. A purely procedural position - vote for what the leader of the faction indicated. And that, in turn, broadcasts what is indicated to him in the presidential administration.
      3. Nikolaevich I
        Nikolaevich I 15 February 2021 12: 32
        +5
        Quote: Boris55
        The apple is not much different from other puppets melted by the West in our political arena.

        I agree with you! At the present time, I have not been interested in Yavlinsky and his "work" for a long time! But there was a time when I looked closely at him ... read articles ... But, rather, quickly turned away from him, when he got tired of the liberal cry of "yavlinism"! And what about Yavlinsky's intentions to give "everything and for free" .. so Crimea and Donbass (!) ... Yavlinsky and the Kuriles are ready to give, for example! In general, it is better to spit on Yavlinsky and grind!
        1. major147
          major147 15 February 2021 13: 29
          +2
          Quote: Nikolaevich I
          I agree with you!

          And I am with you. Himself once in the 90s even voted for Yabloko. Then they confronted the "ever-drunk", but then looking at empty chatter lost interest in them. And in this article, Yavlinsky, accusing Russia of Ukrainian problems (Crimea, Donbass), somehow modestly kept silent about the affairs of the Ukrainian "democrats" in Odessa and elsewhere. Apparently the owners from Washington told him so, but they need to like it, otherwise they won't give money to "fight Putinism".
    2. Civil
      Civil 15 February 2021 10: 12
      +2
      Well, of course, Yavlinsky will not bite his liberals in the Government, one field of berries. However, Provalny was also a member of Yabloko.
      "I cannot compromise my principles."

      Nina Andreeva spoke primarily against what is happening in Russia now. Don't touch her bright name "gentlemen". Do not try to interfere with the communist in your liberal showdown.
    3. Finches
      Finches 15 February 2021 10: 15
      +15
      Throw back Grigory Alekseevich in mothballs, from sin further, even his curators in the State Department were surprised - Alive, smoking room ??? laughing

      He sits in our ZAKS, God knows what he is doing, though we have the entire ZAKS God knows what he is doing ... If you stop a deputy near the Mariinsky Palace and suddenly ask head-on - what have you done useful during your cadence, he will not immediately understand - what do you want from him and who is this cadence! laughing
      1. Pilot
        Pilot 15 February 2021 11: 00
        +1
        Quote: Finches
        Throw back Grigory Alekseevich in mothballs, from sin further, even his curators in the State Department were surprised - Alive, smoking room ??? laughing

        He sits in our ZAKS, God knows what he does, though we have the entire ZAKS God knows what he does ..
        Grishka is not sitting on a jerk, but in your legislative body, he is sitting, which means he serves the existing system and you undeservedly paraffinized him. lol Ay-yay-yay Zyablitsev, you are staggering ... wassat
        1. Finches
          Finches 15 February 2021 11: 07
          -1
          And I didn't choose him there! Therefore, the clamps have nothing to do with it - I am generally against the parliamentary system at all state levels - I am for dictatorship and absolutism! hi
    4. Svarog
      Svarog 15 February 2021 10: 22
      +2
      Quote: NDR-791
      Grigory Alekseevich sold himself to Putin with "guts"
      They are all in the Duma and who did not get there for a long time sold and spent on drink.

      Yavlinsky wants to become a senator for life .. he is no longer interested in votes. In general, they are all Navalny and Yavlinsky of the same berry field.
      1. Nasrat
        Nasrat 15 February 2021 10: 38
        +3
        Everything is simple, with Yavlinsky ... - they began to forget about him, one might say - they forgot that in politics it is tantamount to death. Moreover, the elections are on the way, the old "smoking room" decided to remind about itself - you need to blurt out louder in order to stay on state support .... To paraphrase the classics - they don't do politics with white gloves! All means are good ...
        1. Ross xnumx
          Ross xnumx 15 February 2021 12: 02
          0
          Quote: Nasr
          you need to blurt out louder to stay on state security ...

          Then it is necessary to rename his party to the party "Iron Egg". Let him walk - bryat.
  2. Ros 56
    Ros 56 15 February 2021 10: 08
    +11
    What are we talking about, the apple has already rotted for so many years, it remains only to throw out the pigs for food. hi
  3. Gardamir
    Gardamir 15 February 2021 10: 09
    +11
    For Nina Andreeva to the author Aagromny minus.
    In general, what is the article about? Liberal Yavlinsky exposes Liberal Navalny's film, in which Liberal Navalny exposes liberal Putin. This music will be eternal.
    1. Pilot
      Pilot 15 February 2021 10: 14
      -2
      Hmm, this music is schizophrenic. laughing How will the local systemic liberals-bracers now react to Yavlinsky, now for them, "G" on the board ... or their own ... wassat
      And all because in his article G. Yavlinsky explained in detail why he does not share the line of Alexei Navalny and his supporters from the camp of the liberal opposition.
    2. qQQQ
      qQQQ 15 February 2021 11: 44
      +1
      Quote: Gardamir
      In general, what is the article about? Liberal Yavlinsky exposes Liberal Navalny's film, in which Liberal Navalny exposes liberal Putin. This music will be eternal.

      And all this serves one purpose - to get to the trough himself.
  4. Cowbra
    Cowbra 15 February 2021 10: 18
    0
    Ykhykhy. By the way, it still won't help the sectarians. De-ge-ne-ra-you are a priori selected for any sect. No critical thinking at all. And they do not care who and what will yell in both ears. They will still howl the mantra that blue panties are a sign of democracy and Putin personally at night stole a pension from each of the mother's creepers, snatched it right out of his hands!
    1. aleksejkabanets
      aleksejkabanets 15 February 2021 10: 34
      +1
      Quote: Cowbra
      De-ge-ne-ra-you are a priori selected for any sect. No critical thinking at all.

      Please tell me, on what basis are the characters selected for the "Putin lovers sect"?
      1. Svarog
        Svarog 15 February 2021 10: 41
        -1
        Quote: aleksejkabanets
        Quote: Cowbra
        De-ge-ne-ra-you are a priori selected for any sect. No critical thinking at all.

        Please tell me, on what basis are the characters selected for the "Putin lovers sect"?

        Precisely according to what he described laughing They face facts .. and all the dew of God ..
        The country has lost about seven hundred thousand citizens in a year .. for 7 years in a row the economy has been degrading .. there is no industry .. twenty million beggars .. But in their opinion, this is not an indicator of the president’s activity .. And then what is the indicator?
        1. aleksejkabanets
          aleksejkabanets 15 February 2021 10: 58
          0
          hi
          Quote: Svarog
          The country lost about seven hundred thousand citizens in a year .. for 7 years in a row the economy has been degrading ..

          You are apolitical, Comrade Vladimir. Not "lost about seven hundred thousand citizens", but "the birth rate curve has a slight negative dynamics, with a general positive background" (I can't find where this pearl subtracted). Not "the economy is degrading," but "at certain intervals it shows a slight negative growth."))))))))
          Quote: Svarog
          But in their opinion, this is not an indicator of the president's performance ..

          Certainly not an indicator))))) You just have to endure a little more, the damned State Department is strong, you can't break it right away. The fact that they were all stealing there, so what can you do then. They are good people, they understand everything, they realize, they must be understood and forgiven. It's easy for us here, on our sofas. And they think about Russia !!!!!!
        2. Cottodraton
          Cottodraton 16 February 2021 02: 53
          -1
          Again they carried Mitya's shoes ...
      2. Cowbra
        Cowbra 15 February 2021 11: 00
        0
        They won't take you with svarog. For lack of a sect, I guess. By the way, you just proved, together with svarog, that I'm right.
        1. aleksejkabanets
          aleksejkabanets 15 February 2021 11: 03
          0
          Quote: Cowbra
          They won't take you with svarog.

          We won't go, you boring ones.
          Quote: Cowbra
          By the way, you just proved, together with svarog, that I'm right.

          I'll tell you one secret. Do adults and educated people, when communicating with each other, use the pronoun "you", or do you not count yourself as such?
          1. Cottodraton
            Cottodraton 16 February 2021 02: 54
            -1
            I think you are boring. Whine the same thing every day ...
  5. Doctor
    Doctor 15 February 2021 10: 20
    +4
    Yavlinsky understood what the liberals did not understand.
    Navalny is never a liberal. wink
  6. aars
    aars 15 February 2021 10: 26
    +2
    Small-town squabbles who is cooler than a democrat ...
    Yavlinsky has discredited himself for many years and has not been interesting for a long time ...
    Well, I put in another 500 days, but what's the use of that?
    1. Azimuth
      Azimuth 15 February 2021 11: 00
      -1
      What percentage of people in Russia do not agree with the annexation of Crimea? Small, I think. And Yavlinsky with his opinion, God forbid, if he takes 3%, and Navalny is a competitor. Consequently, he must be screwed up, perhaps the new administration will consider an alternative and the democratic media will start talking about the new savior of the Russian Federation.
      1. Cron
        Cron 15 February 2021 13: 24
        +2
        Small, I think. And Yavlinsky, with his opinion, God forbid, if he takes 3%, and Navalny is a competitor here.

        How old are you? Yavlinsky did not say anything new at all, he had already formed a definite opinion about Lech for a long time and he expressed it regularly. Gregory in his time turned the Nazi Alexei from Yabloko.
        It's just that this "elite" of society is now overexcited, so they are poisoning everyone. Even Echo yesterday with Venediktov fell for a caustic headline about the action of night fireflies
  7. prior
    prior 15 February 2021 10: 37
    0
    As soon as I hear "Yabloko", the association is immediately rotten.
  8. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 15 February 2021 10: 40
    +1
    It is very interesting to observe how the so-called. The "liberal opposition" with pleasure and enthusiasm rushes to devour its adherent and not an ordinary person who dared to express his opinion. They devour their own people and smear them on the wall without pity, but what could happen to those who think completely differently if you give the "light-faced and handshake" power?
  9. Odysseus
    Odysseus 15 February 2021 10: 58
    +4
    It should be noted with some satisfaction that the Russian authorities had previously successfully overthrown themselves. nevertheless, they slowed down this process somewhat and moved on to more meaningful actions. It is difficult to expect any special revelations from them, but they still launched a mandatory program
    1) The king is good, the boyars are bad. So citizen Putin made a sensational discovery last week - the real salaries of scientists are not 85, but 25 thousand. This is, of course, the discovery of the century. But here, of course, Siluanov is to blame, and other officials. Well, and so on.
    2) Submission to elections. The authorities themselves launched information about "social transfers" as much as 500 billion, then they themselves denied it, but the main thing is that the signal has been given. Plus they launched eternal music with "indexation of pensions"
    3) We do not abandon ours. Mr. Putin, who has been standing behind the backs of women and children in the Donbas for 7 years, suddenly remembered his existence. We will not leave Donbass, but we will do it responsibly, because Russia is behind us.
    In part, they are also helped by Navalny, who, in their boundless deceit, could not think of anything better than illuminating the sky with flashlights. Here are the super-technologies of the State Department.
    True, a systemic problem is presented by staff propagandists, officials, and so on. Due to the incredible stupidity combined with sycophancy in their five minutes of hatred for enemies, they give out such that they infuriate even adherents of the cult of patriots Putin-Medvedev.
    PS As for the article, the AP uncovered everyone and even pulled out of the dusty closet, God forgive me, Yavlinsky. The old oppositionist did not disappoint, no matter how delusional the official propaganda is, but the story that Navalny is a national-socialist has surpassed even Channel 1. Liberal skills, as they say, cannot be drunk.
  10. Mikhail3
    Mikhail3 15 February 2021 11: 03
    +2
    For centuries, the Russian people have learned from all the surrounding peoples how to fight. The most advanced techniques and the best weapons were adopted. All this must be done in the military quickly, until the enemy destroyed you, and take the best. Only better. No intermediate stages. It seems that Russian roots are letting down our politicians)
    How are democratic movements developing in the West? Talented and honest people come to politics with faith in democracy and with ideas of struggle for the people's cause. At this stage, they recruit the electorate, gather the same loyal and honest supporters and try to fight for what they believe in. This stage is priceless!
    The fact is that the truly vile, unprincipled and, most importantly, the most effective scoundrels are obtained ONLY from former idealists. As a matter of fact, this is how the Western elite turns out - a person is brought up on the best models, and then they are mercilessly broken. Well, our fighter for the people's cause already has a large and strong party, or a large faction, which he brought into the existing party, strengthening it. And he begins his political career for the present.
    And ours? And our scoundrels immediately gather collectives of scoundrels, and as part of a small band they begin political activities. They do not and cannot have any authority. They do not have a base of idealism, accumulated over the years - the ability and desire to work for the result, perseverance, resentment against idealism that did not help them and poisonous anger ... They just want money and wealth.
    They do not consider it necessary to lead the people, and they cannot - the people will not follow the original scoundrels. The people of such people have come across. So they just rely on political strategists who are bought according to the available budget. That is, the initial bet is on total deception. Do not think (scoundrels are not at all characteristic of brooding. Brains are not so arranged), why are they at the political summit? The authorities themselves will buy political strategists and deceivers of a different kind. Any wallet thicker ...
    These people are just scammers. And that's all. He is treated as swindlers in the country. What about Navalny, what about Yavlinsky, what about the rest. If the authorities had not pursued a fierce policy of total moronization and destruction of all sprouts of knowledge and reason, they would have no supporters at all. Alas, children raised by OUR POWER are very, very good material for turning into bulk. But they will not become members of Yavlinsky's party. To Yavlinsky, the guys from the United States do not make scripts, and he himself understands even fewer American curators in people.
    This man is a political dummy. No matter how anyone give him money.
  11. ALARI
    ALARI 15 February 2021 11: 03
    -1
    They pulled out of the naphthalene thinking that this man was worth something.
  12. U-58
    U-58 15 February 2021 11: 37
    -3
    I read it. Either I understood, or not.
    Is it worth discussing?
  13. Mihail55
    Mihail55 15 February 2021 11: 48
    +1
    Instead of political battles, I look more at the constant "picture" in Yandex - the dollar, the euro, the price of oil. The oil price has reached almost 64 !!!! Almost like in 2014, but then the currency was 2 times CHEAPER !!!! Why is the great ECONOMIST keeping quiet about this ??? Took to judge his former partner ... hmm. I do not approve of either one or the other. No one is interested in the boring economy - the young like to warm up on the street festivities, the elderly to throw out their painful (real plight), officials and other oligarchs are happy to all of us noodles ... DRIVING !!! When will we do our daily business ???? We write ... chatting ... ugh!
  14. rocket757
    rocket757 15 February 2021 12: 03
    -4
    And also in cheap populism

    Cool, considering that this path has not passed anyone.
  15. Daniil Konovalenko
    Daniil Konovalenko 15 February 2021 12: 15
    +2
    All this is ridiculous. The liberal opposition is fighting the liberal government. It is trying to attract the masses for this. None of the above will lose, only the people will lose.
  16. Knell wardenheart
    Knell wardenheart 15 February 2021 12: 32
    0
    Well, firstly, the engine is offended that he "could not" and Navalny "could" cause such a stir, purposefully build up supporters and not lose them, become the agenda of the season, etc.
    Second, of course, an attempt to separate some of the protesters against repression, but who are not specifically supporters of Navalny
    Finally, thirdly, Yavlinsky has long been in a state of political totem, neither he nor Yabloko have long played the role that they played in the golden years for their party (and by the way, even then they did not boggle the imagination). For many years he has not been able to generate some kind of intelligible line, even against the background of Mironov and Zhirinovsky, showing simply miracles of amorphousness and passivity. So this is also an attempt to loudly attract attention, because the Duma elections are ahead.
  17. lis-ik
    lis-ik 15 February 2021 14: 48
    +5
    That's strange. I don’t even know who is more disgusting to me. These are democrats or current crooks. It is not for nothing that the opposition is called systemic. who, if not her. did not break apart with those whom she actually criticizes.
    1. veritas
      veritas 15 February 2021 22: 23
      +1
      Quote: lis-ik
      I don’t even know who is more disgusting to me. These are democrats or current crooks.

      It is not the same?
  18. Cossack 471
    Cossack 471 15 February 2021 19: 38
    +1
    All parties. who in the Duma have stained themselves with the adoption of anti-popular laws. which have worsened our lives and they should all be rolled out in the elections.
    1. syndicalist
      syndicalist 16 February 2021 17: 46
      0
      Quote: Cossack 471
      and they all should be rolled in the elections

      How is it? There are no other parties and will never be. Counts "Against all" too. How are you going to "roll" them?
  19. Nikon OConor
    Nikon OConor 15 February 2021 19: 42
    0
    "Shaw ?, again?" (c) Wolf from the cartoon.
    "This has never happened, and now, again" (C) Chernomyrdin.
    Again? ... where it came from this Yavl ... hmm .. Apple.
    I haven't heard about them for a long time ... and now)))
  20. evgen1221
    evgen1221 15 February 2021 19: 53
    0
    I read several unflattering conclusions about postsovka politicians from the text on the fly. Yavlinsky, the political corpse, decided to promote himself and make money on the hype in the basement, and at the same time, they will change for the political moment and the mood of the authorities (forgive ... and those are more honest.)
    I was poisoned and went to the country to give a reason for sanctions in the big game against the Russian Federation for a couple of lyamas, in general, the same is simple). Nemtsov, who needs proof? The song is the same and it is characteristic that the whole post-Soviet political elite and those rushing there think in the same way, that is, to shout louder and blame a competitor with lies, and then there is no need to answer for slander, all the courts are mine, I am the power. (Moral abomination, and so all politicians live in the post-soviet period in power). The percentage of parties' passage and their state funding, the percentage of support for the passage is generally on the verge of a statistical error, and when voting by party members plus a minimum crowd for shawarma, the passage is guaranteed even without stuffing, but they also do not disdain. State funding, and why should everyone be bothered to keep something else in addition? They receive robust benefits from beneficiaries for laws, plus membership fees, plus fees along the chain from the bottom up. Is it not bold? And finally, what a pity that the population is being led in the elections for advertising and charisma, while ignoring the moral face and the amount of unfulfilled noodles from the previous elections of the same candidate (s).
    1. veritas
      veritas 15 February 2021 22: 26
      +1
      Yavlinsky the political corpse decided to promote himself and make money on the hype in the basement and at the same time they will change under the political moment

      Basement - just making money

      That's the problem. That we all make money. And all politics and politics are aimed at making money. Here is the corresponding result.
  21. iouris
    iouris 15 February 2021 20: 07
    +1
    It's pointless to argue with these guys. They have no socio-economic program. There is a task: to overthrow and destroy. they hate so much that they cannot eat
    1. veritas
      veritas 15 February 2021 22: 27
      +2
      Quote: iouris
      overthrow and destroy

      Yavlinsky does not have such a task. He would have a warm and profitable place and no one would have heard of him for the next twenty years.
  22. Maks1995
    Maks1995 20 February 2021 14: 46
    0
    Another anti-naval attack?
    What he wrote, when, where - no nifig.

    But all the same, to brand everyone, and N, and I, and liberals ...

    Everywhere articles and letters are taught to write - 3 parts and an introduction - a conclusion - something is wrong ...
  23. alexey alexeyev_2
    alexey alexeyev_2 22 February 2021 07: 40
    0
    And I thought that he died ... the smoking room is alive