Kremlin Press Service: The telephone conversation between Vladimir Putin and Joe Biden was businesslike and very frank

It became known that the presidents of Russia and the United States held their first telephone conversations after the inauguration of Joseph Biden. The press service of the head of the Russian state reports that Vladimir Putin congratulated Joe Biden on the beginning of his work as President of the United States and wished him success.

It was noted that in his conversation with Biden, Putin drew attention to the fact that normalization of relations between Moscow and Washington would meet the interests of not only the two countries, but the entire international community. The President of Russia stressed that the Russian Federation and the United States have a special responsibility for maintaining global security.

The heads of state noted the importance of extending the START-3 Treaty, which expires in February. Recall that a few days ago, Biden decided to extend the current agreement for five years, which is provided for by START. Joe Biden's predecessor, Donald Trump, refused to do this, saying that without China joining the treaty, the agreement itself would lose its relevance.

In the conversation between Putin and Biden, they said that representatives of the diplomatic circles of the Russian Federation and the United States would soon complete all procedures that accompany the extension of the START-3 treaty.

Previously, satisfaction with the fact that the treaty is being extended was expressed by almost all states of the world, including the countries of NATO. China also approved the START extension, but without specifying when it is going to join the agreement.

Among other things, according to the Kremlin press service, Vladimir Putin and his American counterpart discussed other important issues on the current international agenda, including the fight against coronavirus, trade and economic activities.

The issue of the US withdrawal from the Open Skies Treaty was also discussed. After leaving the US Donor, Russia also left it.

It is noted that such topics as the Iranian nuclear program, the situation in Ukraine, the initiative to hold a summit of heads of state included in the circle of permanent members of the UN Security Council were discussed.

The Kremlin noted that the telephone conversation was businesslike and very frank.

Comments

[janeck]

This is encouraging ... and gives some hope for a change in the format of communication. in our relationship.

[Cosm22]

"Blessed is he who believes - warmth to that in the world!"
By the way, the version of the essence of the negotiations of the White House secretariat is somewhat different from the Kremlin's.
For some reason, the latter does not mention the issues of the detention of Navalny, the issues of cyber attacks and interference in the American elections, raised by Biden.
Whose version is more true - I can not judge.

[Dodikson]

and where in the article it is written that they did not mention anal, hackers and that the lives of blacks are more important than the lives of whites?
here they mentioned what worries us, and what worries the states will be described by the states.

[Stas157]

... Telephone conversation between Vladimir Putin and Joe Biden was business

The value of this business conversation will be shown by tomorrow's course of wood.

By the way, there is very good news for the ruble - the European parliament is not going to introduce tangible sanctions for the time being because of the persecution of "useless".

[Brturin]

Quote: Stas157

The value of this business conversation will be shown by tomorrow's course of wood.

Based on the very unpopular prediction I made in June of a 35% drop in the dollar by the end of 2021, we are still only in the third round of a baseball game of nine. If the forecast comes true, then it will become an important exclamation mark in the first year of the 46th President of America Joe Biden - a member of the Board of Directors of the US Federal Reserve System Stephen Roach.
https://inosmi.ru/economic/20210126/248993776.html
Tomorrow ... predictions are not rewarding, but ...

[Alex777]

US Treasury candidate Janet Yellen said she would review the United States' sanctions policy if approved. Yellen announced this, speaking at a hearing in the US Senate Finance Committee.
https://www.rbc.ru/politics/20/01/2021/60077e469a79475a5d58a778

The extension of START-3 is likely to lead to the return of the United States to the Don.
If the JCPOA on Iran is restored, the picture of the world will change somewhat.

[Temples]

Quote: BrTurin

Based on the very unpopular prediction I made in June ...

yet another one himself looked like God.
The same sit in government offices throughout Russia.
Forecasters and forecasters.
Perhaps changed to I suppose.

[Temples]

About the article note:
- who called whom?
Previously, Psaki said that Biden picks up the phone if they call him.
It turns out that the President of Russia called the Washington swamp.

On the other hand, the swamp through the psaku made a request for a conversation.

It turns out that I do not want to climb where the devil broke his legs.

[Alex777]

About the article note:
- who called whom?
Previously, Psaki said that Biden picks up the phone if they call him.

This is exactly what you wrote about next:

On the other hand, the swamp through the psaku made a request for a conversation.

It turns out that the President of Russia called the Washington swamp.

They did not wait for such happiness and Biden called himself.
Under the pretext of a note on the extension of START-3.

[antivirus]

Perhaps changed to I suppose.

-Do not you see the difference? that's why the country falls into the leading holes

[Stas157]

Quote: BrTurin

Based on a very unpopular forecast I made in June regarding a 35% drop in dollar quotes by the end of 2021

My forecast was more optimistic for the ruble. But it may not come true. The driver can play sanctions and unfinished construction of SP2 (if this happens). I myself took a buck at 68,2 (I succeeded, I wrote about it at that moment). I sold it at 77,3 (I needed the money, although I could sit still).
I planned to buy again from the level of about 70 rubles. But maybe I thought too well of the wooden one. At the moment, the downward trend is breaking. In general, the situation is uncertainty.

[BecmepH]

Quote: Stas157

At the moment, the downward trend is being broken. In general, the situation is uncertainty.

They call our bucks dollars there (C)

[BecmepH]

Quote: Stas157

By the way, this is not very bad news for the ruble.

Those in power do not need a strong ruble. That means he will not be strong. Unless, before the elections, they will make a feint with the strengthening of the ruble, they will slow down prices for something, they will pay something there, compensate ...
Well, after the elections ... And after the elections they will tell us: "Basta, little kids" ...

[Alex777]

Those in power do not need a strong ruble.

As you know, there are "different towers" in the Kremlin.
Raw materials producers do not need a strong ruble.
But without it, the rise in food prices cannot be stopped.
And the rise in housing prices, and so on.
So let's see how it will be and what interests will prevail.

[BecmepH]

Quote: Alex777

But without it, the rise in food prices cannot be stopped.
And the rise in housing prices, and so on.

And who needs to stop the rise in prices? Well, besides the common people, of course?

[Alex777]

The GDP has been talking a lot about this lately.
Therefore, I propose to see: whose will take?
Personally, I see one way out - tax cuts.
Business, prices and people can be supported only in this way.
When the top will think of this - I don't know.

[BecmepH]

Quote: Alex777

GDP has been talking a lot about this lately

)) And that's it!))

[three]

Shebekinsky pasta (magnet, pack 400 g) - 45% growth per year, sugar, buckwheat. oil ... Indexation of beggarly pensions and monthly incomes - 6%. this is not inflation, this is stagflation (slumpflation). At this rate, the elections themselves will not be needed by the time of the elections, the state will simply not be there, the 90s will be 2.0. Such as the bulk of the crowd will simply demolish as a soft right-wing opportunist and will demand a revolution ... (devaluation of the Nabiullin ruble and a low rate will not help) Although there is still a margin in the level of public debt, here the ruble is already over a hundred ...

[poquello]

Quote: tros

Shebekinsky pasta (magnet, pack 400 gr) - 45% growth per year,

)))))))))))))) A magnet, a magnet, our milk in a cardboard box drives almost 75 rubles each, and small networked under-depressed stores sell it cheaper by almost 10%, everything is according to Adam Smith, predatory plans of corporations the remnants of healthy competition resist

[three]

So the fact of the matter is that the small ones are being strangled, and in the most impudent way - they brought in money (no, not corruption, that you are a lobby) and voila! Healthy competition is also about Adam Smith. And on TV - a bunch of surprised, devoured pestilences .., sorry, faces - "How so? Prices are growing? Can't be!" .... They will wait .... If the demand (CPI) increases by a fraction of a percent, then pride and the dollar grows, while ours have poverty all around, people save on food - even a count on their heads - everything is fine .. ...

[Vadim_888]

... So let's see how it will be and what interests will prevail.

certainly not the interests of ordinary workers and their families

[Krasnoyarsk]

Quote: Stas157

The European Parliament is not going to introduce tangible sanctions for the time being because of the persecution of "unnecessary".

Do not pronounce his name in sue. Is it so?

[Cosm22]

Of course, we have every right to mention something that only worries us.
But one of the criteria for the quality work of a journalist is the objective presentation of information.
The same DB secretariat, covering the conversation, mentioned, among other things, all the facts given in the article.
Why is that? Why not too one-sided?

[Dodikson]

strange, but me all last week gentlemen from Israel and our liberals wrote that the American media do not talk about Russia at all. because she is not interested in ordinary mattresses.

[Nyrobsky]

Quote: Cosm22

But one of the criteria for the quality work of a journalist is the objective presentation of information.
The same DB secretariat, covering the conversation, also mentioned all the facts given in the article. Why so? Why not too one-sided?

The way they amicably and one-sidedly brought down Trump, we still have to learn and learn. Navalny, hackers, interference is a figment of the collective imagination of American politicians, but we are interested in current topics.

[Cosm22]

Clear.
Those. Navalny, his arrest and the film, which has already gained more than 94 million views - is this a topic for Russians not relevant?
By the way, when you say "us", do you sign for all Russians? Then I suppose you are also among those 94 million?

[Dodikson]

the fact that they know how to wind up views is far from news.

[Rusticolus]

the fact that they know how to wind up views is far from news.

Oh yeah, don't be so naive. It is only stupid navalnata who can believe that watching this "movie" around the clock, they wind it up views. Remember how Zuckenberg was reprimanded in Congress as the last student. Do you think Google is better？ Yes, as many as they tell him to draw views, so much he will draw. I can also post any video on my website and draw a counter with at least 100 billion views. And then all that is some kind of a hundred lyamas, tfu and grind, some trifle.

[Dodikson]

I mean the same. and you have already gone to minus.
the liberals really do not like it.

[Temples]

Quote: Cosm22

Navalny, his arrest and the film, which has already gained more than 94 million views - is this a topic for Russians not relevant?

for the "Russians" is apparently relevant.

But among Russians, this causes disgust.
A Russian man, having been born with such substances, only approached with a stick.
With a wand he will throw him away from his path and continue to follow.

And I'll give you a problem. Think.
How many views will an ad banner on the Moscow Ring Road get in a month?

Imagine a banner ad for dog food.
How many dogs will go to the store to buy this food?


Answer:
- on the fence is written "bolt", and behind the fence there is firewood.

[Vadim_888]

... the same I can put any video on my website and draw a counter with at least 100 billion views.

Try this on YouTube
It's one thing to attach a counter on your website, another thing on a platform built to monetize views

[Dodikson]

the YouTube administrator can draw at least a trillion views, moreover, if he wants, instead of numbers, there will be letters written and the penis is drawn.

[Vadim_888]

... a YouTube administrator can draw at least a trillion views,

Maybe, but it won't, and cannot, the reason is trivial - you will have to rewrite the viewing algorithms, but they are not easy there

[Dodikson]

no . it is enough for him to change the value of views in the database. It is done in 10 seconds.

[Vadim_888]

... no . it is enough for him to change the value of views in the database. It is done in 10 seconds.

Are you a Google employee to say that?

[poquello]

Quote: Vadim_888

... no . it is enough for him to change the value of views in the database. It is done in 10 seconds.

Are you a Google employee to say that?

you don't need to be a Google employee for this

[Dodikson]

I know what a server is and how it is managed.
that is, how this is done is known by far more than one million people and only for you this is a secret sealed with seven seals

[Temples]

Quote: Vadim_888

It's one thing to attach a counter on your website.

"Browsing" on the Internet is following a link.
Only.
Following a link does not mean viewing the content at all.

Clicks on the link are made by robots, which are the basis of all search engines.

"Number of views" is more of a technical indicator.

Those who have done at least a little advertising know that the number of views depends on the time.
It is for the time that money is paid.
When it is necessary to convey information to the client in a short period of time, this information is replicated in all possible places.
Money is paid for it.

It makes no sense to advertise the "Magnet" store.
All residents of the area where it is physically located will see the inscription on the store itself many, many times.
For such advertising in the media, you can safely drive a responsible employee into the neck and demand compensation for material damage from him.



"Views" is essentially a report to the customer that the advertising campaign has taken place.
The number of views speaks about the effectiveness of the advertising campaign.
But the number of views does not in any way indicate the quality of the advertised product.

If you want, you can create a company about shit,
With a competent approach and appropriate funding, there will be multimillion-dollar clicks on links (views)
But shit will remain shit.
The result of crap advertising will be disappointment.

But the advertiser will make a lot of money.

Xixiang is that shit.

[Vadim_888]

.
"Browsing" on the Internet is following a link.
Only.

What is more expensive to explain to yourself?
Conduct an independent experiment - go to YouTube, find a channel with a low number of views, select a video, turn on viewing and look at the views counter,
Re-enter and play the video ...
Maybe after that you will understand ...

[poquello]

Quote: Vadim_888

.
"Browsing" on the Internet is following a link.
Only.

What is more expensive to explain to yourself?
Conduct an independent experiment - go to YouTube, find a channel with a low number of views, select a video, turn on viewing and look at the views counter,
Re-enter and play the video ...
Maybe after that you will understand ...

yes, you do not drive this fairy tale, smoke the dynamic assignment of the ip, but rather contact the seo office - you will be given a tariff, how much they will wind up

[Rusticolus]

What the hell are algorithms, they banned their own pridedent because they wanted (or ordered), and nothing. And then all that is some kind of counter ..

[Vadim_888]

For a hundred-dollar boost of views, you need to order from companies that do this, and this costs money, with such amounts of money not small

[Dodikson]

resource owners do not need any money.
they can do anything.

[Vadim_888]

... resource owners do not need any money.
they can do anything.

I agree, that's why I don't watch Solovyov
YouTube does not put him in the rivers, but at the same time you can really see how much he looks and how many dislikes he is gaining

[Alex777]

Read how many foreign countries threw in protests. That's enough for the counters.

[Vadim_888]

Where to read? Did the CIA send you a checklist with Navalny's PR funds?
Yes, Navalny is a provocateur, pop Gapon of the 21st century version, but his investigations do not allow the authorities to sleep peacefully, whoever sponsored them, the authorities themselves are to blame for the appearance of such people, because it was not possible at the beginning of 2000 to take all the media under full control

[Alex777]

Where to read?

Search - you will find what you think is reliable.

because it was not at the beginning of 2000 to take all media under complete control

Tell this to the states. )))
Read the "free press". Rain, Echo ...
We have so much freedom as nowhere else.
Berlusconi, at one time, hounded the media belonging to the States.
The "democrats" bought everyone up. And at home and around the world.
Some antics with Trump are worth something.

Yes, Navalny provocateur, pop Gapon of the 21st century version

Just an agent of the West on the RFP.

but his investigations do not allow the authorities to sleep peacefully, whoever sponsored them

10-year-old tops. Nothing new and important has been found since then. Neither he nor his employers. This is the most important thing for me.

[Vadim_888]

... Rain, Echo ...

rain paid channel, echo - Gazprom media, left to keep the semblance of democracy, my ears fade from the echo,
See telegram channels - Double Yat, By the way, Real War, Nebrechnya, fairly objective info goes
And by the way, yesterday Putin submitted the SNV3 treaty to the State Duma for ratification.
The only suitable channel on TV is Culture, there is no politics

[Crash]

Quote: Vadim_888

It's one thing to attach a counter on your website, another thing on a platform built to monetize views

A completely legal way to transport dollars to the Invincible

[Stas157]

Quote: Dodikson

the fact that they know how to wind up views is far from news

Yes Yes! Nobody saw the movie !! YouTube is brazenly lying to our beloved king! The king himself did not watch the film either - he only told in details. So does the mustache.

[Krasnoyarsk]

Quote: Stas157

Yes Yes! Nobody saw the movie !!

Well, yes, I didn't look. And I don’t understand why such a stir about this?
1. Who is Putin? Putin is a protégé of big business, therefore he himself is a capitalist. 2. We live in a cap. country and under the laws of the cap. countries. Why doesn't Putin have the right to build something there for himself? If he really does.
3. There is evidence that he builds, if he builds, at the expense of the state. budget? No.
Why such a stir?
So, if he builds, and at his own expense, then he has the right.
In the 90s, we wanted "freedom" and 100 varieties of sausage? So - eat and do not crap.
Say it's immoral. And where is morality in the cap. society?

[Nastia makarova]

that's exactly the bulk itself does not interest anyone))) of all who left 10% only for bulk

[mikh-korsakov]

Vladimir. What the Russians watched happened simply because of the advertising of this film in the media (and in both negative and positive directions). This does not mean anything - I looked - we could have tried better - glued together roughly - they are lazy. Now the liberals will begin to minus me, but what about freedom of opinion?

[Nyrobsky]

Quote: Cosm22

By the way, when you say "us", do you sign for all Russians?

No. In this case, when I use the word "us" I mean the state. Two sides, "their side" and "our side," took part in the conversation, and coverage of events in the media from "their side" and from "our side".

Quote: Cosm22

Navalny, his arrest and the film, which has already received more than 94 million views, Then one must assume. Are you also among those 94 million?

No, I have not watched Navalny's film because I do not consider this pretzel a figure worthy of any attention. Well, perhaps from the side of law enforcement agencies.

[poquello]

Quote: Cosm22

Clear.
Those. Navalny, his arrest and the film, which has already gained more than 94 million views - is this a topic for Russians not relevant?
By the way, when you say "us", do you sign for all Russians? Then I suppose you are also among those 94 million?

I have not watched and I am not going to watch the movie you advertise))))))))))))))))))))), about 94 million I already wrote everything earlier - divide by 10, in the USA more than lives, and you refer to YouTube, they generally refer to the left office, especially by counting votes

[poquello]

Quote: Cosm22

Of course, we have every right to mention something that only worries us.
But one of the criteria for the quality work of a journalist is the objective presentation of information.
The same DB secretariat, covering the conversation, mentioned, among other things, all the facts given in the article.
Why is that? Why not too one-sided?

yes, it is somehow inconvenient, suddenly he will be offended, the DB did not say that he was sent on all these issues to the mail car

[Konnick]

Do you need to be able to read between the lines?
And between the lines of the message of the Kremlin press service it was written I am not me and the house, that is, the palace, not mine. As they say, someone does not finish saying something. To avoid misunderstandings, it was necessary to mention all the topics of the conversation.

[Machito]

Quote: Dodikson

and where in the article it is written that they did not mention anal, hackers and that the lives of blacks are more important than the lives of whites?
here they mentioned what worries us, and what worries the states will be described by the states.

We in Russia are very worried that blacks have stopped robbing shops, and whites have stopped kneeling before blacks. Where is democracy? Biden needs to activate the atrocities of blacks for the triumph of freedom. Yes, and the Statue of Liberty needs to be repainted black.

[Rusticolus]

Hey Hey hey. Only black is not allowed. LGBT people will be offended. You need the front half with boots in black, and the back must be in rainbow. So it will be tolerant.

[tihonmarine]

Quote: Cosm22

For some reason, the latter does not mention the issues of the detention of Navalny raised by Biden,

Was this question understood? As if the Navalny navel of the Earth, and other serious matters Putin and Biden no longer have.

[KCA]

Right against the background of talks about START-3, there are no more important topics than Anal, well, absolutely in the first conversation there is nothing more to discuss than some Berlin patient, and the conversation about the notorious cyberattacks and interference would turn to mutual "self", you just imagine negotiations between the two presidents?

[KCA]

Censored, it was "myself" a synonym for the word stupid person "

[eklmn]

Quote: Cosm22

Whose version is more true - I can not judge.

And in vain, tk. The Kremlin believes that the citizens of Russia need to know only what is of interest to the Kremlin, and the Kremlin edits the info. Biden discussed with Putin the poisoning of Navalny, his arrest, dispersal of demonstrations, support for Ukraine against Russian aggression, Russian interference in the amer elections and hacker attacks. The Kremlin's streamlined briefing about the call reminds the CPSU newsreel before the start of all the films: A meeting of delegations took place in the Kremlin today ... The meeting was held in a friendly atmosphere ...
In short - on this site, in Russian, you can read different interpretations ...
https://www.bbc.com/russian/news-55819378

[Botanologist]

The Kremlin believes that press releases need to write an official format. If you are interested in what was said and in what tone - wait for the memoirs.

[eklmn]

Quote: Botanologist

The Kremlin believes that press releases need to write an official format.

The official format has nothing to do with hiding the topics of discussion. Yes, a press release may not include a list of all the topics of discussion, but when there is not a single hot topic on this list, unpleasant, but discussed with Putin, then this is associated with a “cowardly” president. After all, with the Internet open to Russians, there is no point in hiding the discussion of topics, since open sources in the west, you can find out "at_them" ...

[3315061]

Biden looks too old for his 74 years, he may not live until the end of his term .... But the format of communication with the United States is unlikely to change - across the throat Russia is their "deep state", led by shadowy all-powerful globalists.

[kapitan92]

Quote: 3315061

Biden looks very old for his 74 years,

Biden is 78 years old. (20.November 1942)

[Kushka]

There is an old woman Joan Collins, born in 1933. at the camera
got accustomed, neighing about this "scratch",
and at home I immediately rolled a "glass". Can,
so jerk in front of her.

[210ox]

Come on. This is a common sample statement. It is usual when dealing with the new president of zashtatnikov. Then the fun and the Sabbath will begin.

[Krasnoyarsk]

Quote: Janek

This is encouraging ..

Well I do not know. On the one hand, I understand why China is in no hurry to join. And on the other, hottsa and limit him in this matter. Careful, as they say ...

[polpot]

Agent Bidon got in touch, and Andropov recruited to extradite.

[Pamir]

Here is the evidence, they need START3 more than the RF. They don't want the RF to withdraw from it, oh, how they don't want to.

[Vadim_888]

They need China to join it (SNV3), they don't care about Russia.

[113262a]

What a bad feeling after reading all this. Yesterday they breathed so, breathed so ...

[g1v2]

The can has already done a lot of useful things. Prolonged SNV3, stopped construction of a pipeline from Canada, banned drilling on federal lands, etc. The shutdown of the pipeline from Canada means that refineries on the US coast will not receive Canadian oil, but will buy either Venezuelan oil or ours. The blow to the American oil and gas workers all the more plays into our hands. In general, Brezhnev's friend started well for us.

[Vaўkalak]

I doubt that they will buy Venezuelan, it is very annoying to them that they could not throw off Maduro for so many years. It is unlikely that they will buy oil from a person whom they could not move, having spent a lot of money and time. For some reason, it seems to me that they will take on Venezuela (and not only) even more tightly, all the same, such a "group" got administration.

[g1v2]

Well, that means they will buy Venezuelan oil through us. They still have little choice. Only heavy oil is suitable for these refineries. That is, once the pipeline has broken off, then either we, or Venezuela or Iran.

[Quadro]

START is not profitable for us, they are knocking out their time like this.

[Rusticolus]

I think so too. We must withdraw from START. To quickly build up the nuclear arsenal 10 times like this, and then we can agree again on what we have.

[KCA]

In Venezuela, heavy oil, no ice, will not save, so tankers will drive from the same Canada

[Dkuznecov]

"was businesslike and quite outspoken"
"- How are you, Can?
- I will be frank, Volodya ... "

[Knell wardenheart]

What else could the Kremlin press service (Peskov's clones, in fact) say about this conversation? Considering how Biden "loves" Putin, how Putin "loves" Biden. The essence of the future relationship was clearly visible from the way we delayed to the last with congratulations to Biden, because of how relish Biden said that Trump is an agent of Moscow's interests and personally VVP. It would be better to simply not comment in any way, than to add more lies in the time already saturated with lies ..
I do not know why we need this agreement, what we are trying to preserve them. Unless we are trying to somehow slow down the transition to low-yield nuclear weapons in the American strategy ..

[Runway]

So START does not regulate the number of TNW?

[Odysseus]

Quote: WFP

So START does not regulate the number of TNW?

Of course not. These are completely different topics.

[Knell wardenheart]

START-3 regulates the number of nuclear warheads on carriers such as missiles and nuclear submarines. It does not apply to knapsack nuclear bombs or low-yield free-fall bombs. However, it will probably protect against low-power installations on missiles. Maybe. But that's all)
Considering the superiority of the United States in conventional weapons and economic and industrial capabilities to create a layered innovative missile defense system, there is absolutely no reason for them to fool us in excess of their 1400-1500 warheads, but in our case, just the same, given the total resources of NATO and their bait may not be sufficient.
In this regard, I do not quite understand the fanaticism with which we clung to START-3, given that our developments are based on a strategy with the use of nuclear weapons in the event of a major war.

[KCA]

The number of TNW has not been counted by anyone at all, but Russia has much more, according to rumors, as much as 20 times

[Odysseus]

Quote: Knell Wardenheart

I don't know why we need this agreement, what are we trying to keep them

We just really need it. And so the Voevoda has to extend the service life for the 150th time and put a hundred square meters from storage. But globalists do not stake on the fight against the PRC and on nuclear domination, like Trump. So Biden also needs this agreement.
We agreed and thank God.

[Knell wardenheart]

There is no military need to support this treaty - the world is still based on the fear of guaranteed destruction. True, on their part (the United States) there are economic resources to gradually move the resolution of this containment in their favor - from the point of view of the fact that the BSU can cut down a number of our objects with nuclear weapons, their fleet and aviation can cut down part of our missile carriers, the developing global missile defense system can also be detected in the prospect are more likely to intercept our warheads. And given the fact that not all elements of our retaliatory strike will be launched at the same time - in the future, again, we run the risk of finding ourselves in a situation where their military planning and R&D will be built under this specific START-3 limit. The main charm of defense is concealment of opportunities, we personally give to the enemy.
The essence of START-3 is more and more political - they say we are the dove of peace, we agree, we hold the world on our weary shoulders together with the United States, as they say. In general, this is a historical fetishism, which in my opinion has little to do with defense and the real state of affairs today (sad, I must say).
I hope I am wrong! )

[Odysseus]

Biden described his agenda - START-3, Ukraine, Navalny, hackers, Iran, etc.
We agreed on START-3. What was expected.
But that's better than nothing.

[Egoza]

Ay-y-yay! Only today Psaka said that the conversation with VVP is not yet on Biden's schedule! And they just ... and talked! This is their conspiracy!

[Konnick]

Quote: tihonmarine

As if the bulk of the navel of the Earth, and other serious matters Putin and Biden no longer have.

Judging by the news, Putin has no more serious case.

[Konnick]

Quote: Egoza

Ay-y-yay! Only today Psaka said that the conversation with VVP is not yet on Biden's schedule! And they just ... and talked! This is their conspiracy!

And whoever said that Biden called, most likely Putin called to congratulate Biden.

[mikh-korsakov]

Nikolay. Psaki said it was Biden who called. Of course, Psaki d.ura could have confused, but still.

[Konnick]

Do you have this information? I can't find where Psaki said that Biden called Putin. By common sense, Putin called Biden and congratulated.

[mikh-korsakov]

Nikolay. I received this information today from Yandex, directly from the search box. Putin has already congratulated with a telegram, apparently through force, because there are a lot of questions for the elections. But when we have elections, regardless of how they are held, the entire West will stand up and declare that nothing more disgusting than our elections has happened in history. This is the difference between the position of the strong and the weak. Weak refers to laws. Strong declares - I want and can. But the West is mistaken, despite its vile intrigues, in fact, the real situation in the economy is better than five years ago (I emphasize, in the economy - not the same as in my pocket). Under Stalin, everything grew in the economy, and money was saved in pockets to buy a coat for his son for the winter.

[mojohed2012]

Another message "smoothed" for domestic Russian consumption. I can't believe that Baydon's puppeteers put such sane and polite topics for discussion into his mouth. On the eve, I remember, he shouted that there would be a tough talk with Putin with presentations. The way the United States is behaving more and more impudently and more assertively demonstrates that apart from the nuclear weapons treaty, we will not see any advantages and friendly impulses. It will only get worse. God grant Nord Stream 2 to be completed and launched without incidents. And the Russians will survive, as always. For gasoline rises in price, followed by products and tariffs for everything.

[mikh-korsakov]

I'm not talking about the content of the conversation - it's a diplomatic secret. I'm talking about the commentary on the conversation that I read in the article. The comments are written in the avian language typical of the Soviet press. What is it worth "the telephone conversation was businesslike and very frank". I think that translated from bird into Russian this phrase means: Biden -" immediately give Crimea and Donbass to Ukraine, release Navalny, then we will think about cooperating with you or demanding to do something else, because Russia is nowhere without a dollar , as without a dollar. So think Vladimir, or not that
I won't give you dollars. "Putin -" Joseph, but you know that contacts are beneficial to both parties? Biden "well, yes - they are profitable, so give us Sevastopol - then it will be profitable for us - for a while.

[Baloo]

Colonel Bidenov received a complete deal. It is difficult to say how adequate he is with his age-related cyclical thinking and emphasis on the empire of evil. I believe that the GDP did not bend and will not bend like Medvedev before Obama. It's good that we will never know what Medvedev whined so pitifully that Obama patted him on the knee in a friendly way.

[Petro_tut]

Obama. It is good that we will never know what Medvedev whined so mournfully that Obama patted him on the knee in a friendly way.

The firmware from the iPhone flew

[svoit]

Quote: mikh-korsakov

could try better

You can always do better, but for propaganda it will do just fine. Although, for example, self-respecting (and consumer) propagandists would have tried better. This film is suitable when there is already a revolutionary situation, but for its preparation it is not suitable.

[Bomb]

Did you tell about the palace?

[Baloo]

Quote: Bomb

Did you tell about the palace?

see on RT "This video turned the idea of ​​bulk upside down", there is about the palace, and about the owner, and about the difficult share of a corrupt dog, a petty crook and a traitor sucked from behind the fence. And about the palace VVP told us everything at a meeting with students. The navralny's career for the benefit of the Stars and Stripes began at the courses at Yale University in 2006, as well as at the State Duma deputy Gudkov.

[evgen1221]

A brief summary of the conversation - OK, you won, slow down the horses pliz, otherwise the population here is almost ready to sweep us away, we apologize for the inconvenience caused to you, we are ready for any requests and wishes from across the ocean. Yours forever!