The Ministry of Defense received a new batch of modernized T-80BVM tanks

The Russian Ministry of Defense has received another batch of modernized tanks T-80BVM. This was reported by the press service of the Uralvagonzavod concern.

According to the report, T-80BVM tanks were produced in Omsk at a transport engineering plant (Omsktransmash) and transferred to the Russian Ministry of Defense as part of the state defense order. The entire batch went to the customer at the end of December. The number of new equipment in the party has not been reported.

As part of the execution of the state defense order (GOZ) in December 2020, the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation received a batch of T-80BVM tanks produced by the Omsk Transport Machine Building Plant. The tanks were thoroughly tested before entering service with the Russian army.

- Reported the press service.

At present, Omsktransmash has started to fulfill the state defense order in 2021.

The T-80B tank and its modifications were produced at Omsktransmash JSC from 1979 to 1991 a year. The latest modification was the T-80BV tank, adopted by the Soviet army in the 1985 year. MBT T-80BVM - a new version of the modernization of the tank, developed in Omsk.

The machine, which has undergone a thorough modernization, is equipped with an 125-mm gun, which has the ability to fire guided missiles, a multi-channel sight, a modified gas turbine engine with 1250 horsepower, an arms stabilizer and a driver’s observation device. The tank is protected from fire by a complex of modular dynamic protection and an anti-cumulative lattice screen.

In Soviet times, more than 10 thousand T-80 tanks of various modifications were produced.

Comments

[Magic archer]

It would be interesting to see him in the tank biathlon. It's strange why nobody else is allowed there except for the T-72

[Graz]

it is logical that an export-oriented machine will be used there, so 80k will never appear there

[bad]

Quote: Magic Archer

It's strange why nobody else is allowed there except for the T-72

Of the potential participants with the T-80, not everyone is familiar. T-72 is more common.

[113262a]

Because crews of eighty will make the rest of the participants like children! Convenience, ergonomics and intuitive work of all crew members make such competitions unequal! And UVZ will never admit that their tanks are for the poor!

[d4rkmesa]

The Chinese brought their Type-96. In general, it is logical that one platform, so all participants are on an equal footing, otherwise you need to introduce strict regulations and regulate, as in "Formula 1". With military equipment, this is hardly possible.

[Magic archer]

Yes, what does some regulation have to do with it)? NATO members use more than one platform in their similar competitions. The only thing that they have in common is the caliber and ammunition. So we have 125 mm on all tanks

[d4rkmesa]

And what does NATO have to do with it? Is it okay that the essence of these competitions is different? For example, in the Russian biathlon there is an "individual race" stage. How do you imagine the race of very different cars?

[antivirus]

the main thing - for sand or for black soil undercarriage? Kohly should think about it.

[Aerodrome]

The number of new equipment in the party has not been reported.

and what, the T-80 BVM, is produced from scratch? gee ...

[YOUR]

Completed in 1998

[venik]

Quote: antivirus

the main thing - for sand or for black soil undercarriage? Kohly should think about it.

=========
And I walked well on the sand and on black soil!

[Togilen]

Because the T-72B3 is the main (and poor) tank of the Russian Federation. And recently the girls performed at 80UE-1

[Lord of the Sith]

For the poor, he is also poor (no).

In battle, he showed himself perfectly. Just how do you know?))

[Togilen]

Listen boy. If you are not aware that before becoming 72B3 in 2016, all these gadgets were tried, perhaps before your birth. For example, the famous photograph during the storming of Grozny in 1996. T-72B (88 g) into which 172M crashed. After that there was a 72B2 modification with a real Relic, and not with an EDZ 4S23 in the K-5 building, if you don't understand this, then there is no point in talking to you.
In addition, tell me in what battles he managed to participate and where did he show himself perfectly? In addition to several vehicles in Syria and the Donbass, where he encountered enemy armored vehicles only in the second case, and not always successfully.

[Lord of the Sith]

In Donbass, he tore the Sumerians into rags, especially in Debal, although how do you know that. Boy)))
Have you ever seen him in battle?

[Togilen]

No, I saw the T-62M in battle. And what vomited you in "Debala" is basically 64BV and 72B. I ask you to ride on the sidelines, you are our cheerful one.

[Togilen]

I saw the T-62M in battle.
I'll tell you this. Nehru to talk about what you saw, two if you are on the other side of the barricade misinformation is also not worth letting. And then after all, to listen to you so there were only 72B3 and there were .... despite the video chronicle (including personal) that mostly 64BV and 72B rolled. Keep quiet more.

[Lord of the Sith]

Didn't see means. Well, why are you raising feathers here, if not in the subject?

And you listen to one place hike. I never said that there were only 72B3.
I say that they showed only the positive side.

And video chronicles can only be downloaded to a USB flash drive and inserted into that place below the belt, which is very far from hygiene.

I personally do not intend to be silent, seeing the pioneers around))

ZY About fucking chatting. Did I tell you a particularly big secret? Those who are in the subject know. Unlike some)))

[113262a]

At 14 until the arrival of the NORTH WIND We fought exclusively on this. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g14nJvgPuI4 They fought as best they could, hence the different results. This one was out of luck. Many 64 have survived to this day. And 72b and bv-old ones appeared on August 15-20. And apparently, they also danced lezginka!)))

[Lord of the Sith]

Yes ... This is trophy 64, the guys who stopped the Sumerians are real heroes. Cartilage, then Sharp Mogila, and Lugansk. At the cost of their lives, they did not let the Ukronazis.
Summer 2014 was hot.
From personal.

[Togilen]

It is because of such cretins, including those who take selfies against the background of this or that technique, the Western press raises panic, and the Ukrainian press raises panic among the population of Ukraine, including convincing the Ukrainians that their country is at war with the Russian Federation. You are one of those idiots.
Something else. I am absolutely violet on people like you, the fact that 72B3 were there, it was shown by a lot, including the Russian Federation channels. But what did they "tear" there? Abrams, Leopards, Challengers? here you need to compare 72B3 with equipment that is in service with NATO countries, and not 64BV APU with overhaul. If you cannot understand this on a physical level, these are only your problems. And unfortunately for everyone, they will stay with you for the rest of your life.

[Lord of the Sith]

Where do you see a selfie, dodik?)) Do you even know what this word is?)))

Those who need and so know who is fighting whom.

And yes, getting personal is so-so. For blockheads and infantile Buratin.

In short, sklifasoska-nipple, let me decide for myself what to post, what to write, and what not.
As an officer of the 2nd AK NM LNR.

Let me command a little in my country?

[Togilen]

In fictional? command me to spit. see you soon troll
P.S. About personalities, well, then write to yourself in a reproach, the "first line" behind you was a boy. "an officer"

[vindigo]

And the lattice screens were already installed then.

[Togilen]

RE, additional booking, as well as lining from aramid fabric, began to be used in Afghanistan. developer of the Research Institute of Steel. So no "Syrian experience" is at all in the works.

[vindigo]

It was just that at one time it was customary to laugh at the lattice screens of the Ukrainians. Fences, etc. And in fact, we ourselves have been using them for a long time.

[Togilen]

Their REs were made homemade. Those that stood in Afghanistan and Chechnya are the result of the exact calculation of the Research Institute of Steel, the distance of the RE from the hull or tower, the pitch of the bars, their thickness, etc. + fasteners, material and much more.

[frei67]

I confirm. On my tank in Afghanistan, which came to replace 87, there were grilles.

[Togilen]

They stood wherever they were. Development of the Research Institute of Steel. Chechnya 2001

[Ros 56]

What for? There is no need to upset foreigners, and the T-72 shows itself perfectly.

[Bad_gr]

Quote: Ros 56

and the T-72 shows itself perfectly.

He even manages to set records. Let your own, but who would have thought that it could be fired up to such speed:

At the tank biathlon competition, Russian tankers were able to accelerate the T-72B3 combat vehicle to a speed of 84 kilometers per hour. This is a new tournament record.

https://www.ferra.ru/news/techlife/v-rossii-pobili-rekord-po-skorosti-peredvizheniya-tanka-18-08-2019.htm

[Diverter]

Because tank biathlon is also an advertising campaign for T 72

[Vladimir_2U]

The "window" on the sides of the cannon was never covered.

[frei67]

and you still need to get there. when driving and at a distance of 2-3 km, they shoot at the silhouette

[Vladimir_2U]

Quote: frei67

and you still need to get there. when driving yes at a distance of 2-3 km

And what, closer to some particularly strict instructions, is it forbidden to shoot? Not to mention the accidental hit, in the most fired part of the tank, actually.

[frei67]

by now, tank battles are likely to have outlived theirs. In Syria, the fighting was fought from holes in the ruins. most of the losses, if not all of them are losses from pturov

[Vladimir_2U]

Quote: frei67

most of the losses, if not all of them are losses from pturov

And now you can leave the "hole" in the fired place of the tank?

[frei67]

and here the question is not the desire or unwillingness to cover the hole. it is impossible to adequately cover it due to the location of the mechanical drive hatch. if you cover it like the whole tower, the fighter will not be able to leave the tank

[Vladimir_2U]

Quote: frei67

it is impossible to adequately cover it due to the location of the mechanical drive hatch

But no, the T-90MS has solved this problem.

[frei67]

but not the fact that the plate will work almost at a right angle

[Vladimir_2U]

Quote: frei67

but not the fact that the plate will work almost at a right angle

Find a right angle in the photo, by the way, what do you mean by that?

[frei67]

poor mech. one hundred percent he will not get through there

[Vladimir_2U]

Quote: frei67

poor mech. one hundred percent he will not get through there

It's funny how he got there, not with the holy spirit.

[Bad_gr]

Quote: frei67

poor mech. one hundred percent he will not get through there

The driver can have problems leaving the tank through his hatch in two cases:
if the gun barrel is lowered onto the hatch and
if the tower is turned with the barrel back.
Then he got out of the tank only through the battle. AZ, unlike MZ, allows it.

[frei67]

a photo from a different angle below from comrade misfortune geer shows what angle there is

[Vladimir_2U]

Quote: frei67

comrade troubles geer

What kind of words are these?

[venik]

Quote: Vladimir_2U

And what, closer to some particularly strict instructions, is it forbidden to shoot? Not to mention the accidental hit, in the most fired part of the tank, actually.

=======
It's simple, even at relatively small distances, to lay the projectile exactly "into a hole" 50x50 cm in size, is quite problematic, especially if the tank is moving (and even shooting) ..... Here in general - God forbid, at least somewhere get there!

[Vladimir_2U]

Quote: venik

exactly "in the hole" 50x50 cm

There is generally more, but more importantly, the forehead of the turret is the most exposed part of the tank, and the probability of hitting this "hole" is directly proportional to the ratio of the hole area to the turret projection area, purely statistically, provided that it hits the turret projection by itself.

[Sanichsan]

Quote: Vladimir_2U

There is generally more, but more importantly, the forehead of the tower is the most substituted part of the tank.

let's operate with facts, in the case of the T-72 this is not a problem. this tank is involved in a great many conflicts. Kindly statistics, how often T-72s hit this supposedly vulnerable spot.
I could not find any photos with defeat in this place

[Vladimir_2U]

To begin with, I wrote not "the most striking", but the "most substituted" - a very big difference.

Quote: SanichSan

in the case of the T-72, this is not a problem. this tank is involved in a great many conflicts

In the overwhelming majority of conflicts, these tanks fight against the "partisans" with appropriate weapons and tactics and are knocked out, respectively, on the sides and stern, so your claim is not entirely justified. Although there is a photo of the T-90 hit in the forehead, it is quite famous:

So, with all the "partisan" tactics, not even ATO, but "hunting" tanks, such hits are possible. What we see: "Shtora" did not work, or maybe it did not work at all, the frontal armor was not affected at all, thanks to the remote sensing unit. And here assumptions are quite possible: what if the ATGM got closer to the gun, bypassing the remote control; if instead of the ATGM BOPS more modern, how would everything have turned out then?

However, with all this, they created and are creating tanks based on the likelihood of meeting with other tanks, and here the vulnerability, which is also completely removable, is useless.
I wish you success.

[Sanichsan]

Quote: Vladimir_2U

To begin with, I wrote not "the most striking", but the "most substituted" - a very big difference.

I beg of you! this "vulnerability" is targeted by the players of the computer game wartander in order to knock out the barrel or the breech. where does real life ???

Quote: Vladimir_2U

In the overwhelming majority of conflicts, these tanks are fighting against the "partisans" with appropriate weapons and tactics and are knocked out, respectively, in the sides and stern, so your claim is not entirely justified.

the fact that the side and stern are the most vulnerable has nothing to do with guerrilla tactics. it is a fact. it is not the partisans who hit the tank in the most vulnerable places, but everyone. yes, there are rare exceptions. for example, your photo or video with an Abrams that was burned in the forehead with a cornet ... by the way, both are not in the mask of a gun.

Quote: Vladimir_2U

Although there is a photo of the T-90 hit on the forehead, it is quite famous:

you are a little disingenuous firstly, this T-90 was hit in the forehead of the turret, and not in the gun mantlet. that is, again past your supposed vulnerability. secondly, everyone has long known that he was hit in the forehead of the tower not by accident, but thanks to the action of the tank's protective systems.

PS
I agree with you that it is better when there is reliable protection everywhere than when the protection is fragmented, but in this particular case it is a very insignificant problem.

[venik]

Quote: Vladimir_2U

There is generally more, but more importantly, the forehead of the tower is the most exposed part of the tank, and the probability of hitting this "hole" is directly proportional to the ratio of the area of ​​the hole to the area of ​​the projection of the tower,

========
If you do not take into account the probability of shooting "strictly in the forehead" of the tower! The rest is correct: we take the area frontal projection of the entire tank (hull + turret) we relate to the area of ​​the "hole", we introduce an amendment for the probability of firing "strictly on the forehead"and get the probability of hitting the" hole "taking into account the probability of a miss.!

[Vladimir_2U]

Quote: venik

we introduce a correction for the probability of shooting "strictly in the forehead" and we obtain the probability of hitting the "hole" taking into account the probability of a miss.!

Non-alcoholic! )))

[venik]

Quote: Vladimir_2U

Quote: venik

we introduce a correction for the probability of shooting "strictly in the forehead" and we obtain the probability of hitting the "hole" taking into account the probability of a miss.!

Non-alcoholic! )))

=========
Well, I do not! Non-alcoholic beer is the same as sex without partner!
Happy Old New Year! (Not "non-alcoholic" !!!)

[Vladimir_2U]

Quote: venik

Non-alcoholic beer is the same as having sex without a partner!

Yes, I don't even drink that, and nothing, my wife is only glad! ))) So my alcoholic beer is more like sex without a partner. Most funny, but true.

[Togilen]

At the exercises, tanker Abram broke in a different way from 2.6 km at night. At our biathlon, the BEST crews smear every day from a smaller distance every year. Not to mention last year's shameful firing of rockets where in milk: T-90A - 1 hit, 80U - 1 hit, 80UE-1 - 2, 80BVM - 0, 72B3 - 4 out of 4.
So think about what will happen in a real clash. We have everything during the day and from short distances with the BEST crews. And the average amerikos hit the target from 2,6 km at night.

[Kart]

How many hits are there? One?
I thought so. It happens.

[Togilen]

Wow, but we have several shells and missiles going into the molokon ... it happens.

[Uncle Vanya Susanin]

And the average amerikos hit the target from 2,6 km at night.

turn epic obser into epic rework, it's epic I give a hint: the Americans have over 8 non-combat losses in aviation over the past 200 years, try to come up with some epic excuse for this, well, like: "they fly a lot, what great fellows", etc. etc.

[Ben Gunn]

Regarding aviation - yes, they fly a lot, to the fullest and in any weather conditions, and especially a lot - the aviation of the fleet, where the accident rate has always been many times higher. I personally discussed this topic with American pilots. But they had a hard joint with the tank, there are no excuses.

[sustav75]

To put you and people like you there! And shoot from two kilometers. We will not get into this open zone!

[frei67]

and I was sitting there in Afghanistan. so don't be smart

[Vladimir_2U]

Quote: frei67

and I was sitting there in Afghanistan. so don't be smart

On the T-80?

[frei67]

T-62M course

[Vladimir_2U]

Quote: frei67

T-62M course

Respect.

[svp67]

The Ministry of Defense received a new batch of modernized T-80BVM tanks

Well, it's better late than not when ...

The T-80B tank and its modifications were produced at Omsktransmash JSC from 1979 to 1991. The last modification was the T-80BV tank, which was adopted by the Soviet army in 1985.

The author, in "LITERA" do not get confused. The last modification of the T-80, just produced in Omsk, was the T-80U. And in 1985, the T-80BV was in front of him.

[Dimide]

And where are the new "Armata"?
They "pointed a finger" to Ukraine, they say they are modernizing old stuff

[sustav75]

100-500 times already said! For parades!

[Dimide]

No, not so, it was put into service only in the "Arbat Military District"

[Kart]

If you get there, honestly, you will have Armats. At the gate.

[sustav75]

How I would like the "armata" to stand at the gates of nowadays Bandera-fascist Kiev!

[Dimide]

They will not reach it on their own, there is no normal "dvigla", 900 km after all

[Bad_gr]

Quote: Dimid

They will not reach it on their own, there is no normal "dvigla"

Since when has he not been?
The MTU-2 and MTU-16 units were developed with a 1200V1 diesel engine (X-shaped, 2 l / s). This was in the late 1970s, early 1980s. These monoblocks were developed for modernization and as a backup option for the initially T-80 gas turbine tank. They were run in at the Chelyabinsk "object 785", "object 219RD (St. Petersburg) and at" object 186 "(from UVZ). The development of this motor (with a 2V12-3 (A-85-3) engine - 1500 l / s) stood on the" object 187 "and" object 195 "(aka T-95). I came across information that along the 195 polygons I wound about 12 thousand km with it.
The fact that someone wants to get money for the development of a new dvigla does not mean that there is no normal engine at the moment.

[Dimide]

And they are already massively equipping the "Armata"? What is the saturation of the troops with the same "Aromas" or how many T-14s are in the ZabVO? Still, the seventh year comes from the time of the first reports

[Bad_gr]

Quote: Dimid

And they are already massively equipping the "Armata"?

The "Armata" has an engine compartment from "Object 195". How many tanks, so many installed engine compartments. Or what are you asking about, I'm already confused about something:
You mean that we do not have engines for tanks or
about the fact that we have no tanks in the troops?

[Dimide]

It is in the troops, not for parades.
Some want to come to "visit" on "Armata"

[Bad_gr]

Quote: Dimid

And where are the new "Armata"?
They were pointing a finger to Ukraine

Once again, "I'll poke my finger": according to information from the same Ukraine, their warriors against "Armata" are fighting in full in the Donbass. Photos, however, do not confirm this (the smartphone has run out of batteries).

[Dimide]

The FSB also constantly intercepts the breakthroughs of the DRG MTR of Ukraine at the border, but it turns out that ordinary "gesheftmachers" wipe out

[svoit]

Quote: frei67

by now, tank battles have most likely outlived their

Probably not, just with strongly unequal sides, it is difficult to save a tank for an oncoming battle

[113262a]

The machine, which has undergone a deep modernization, is equipped with a 125-mm cannon capable of firing guided missiles, a multi-channel sight, a modified 1250 hp gas turbine engine, a weapon stabilizer and a driver's observation device. The tank is protected from fire by a modular ERA and an anti-cumulative lattice screen. Of all the above, only a lattice screen is new! Almost nothing has changed since my demobilization in '85! In addition, UVZ ate Omsktransmash.

[Bad_gr]

Quote: 113262

Of all the above, only a lattice screen is new!

It was

It became

Quote: 113262

UVZ gobbled up Omsktransmash.

"Gobbled up" - how's that? Redeemed and destroyed? How does he then produce tanks and special equipment?

[113262a]

Gobbled it through intrigues in the government brought to the closure of tank production at the Kirov plant in St. Petersburg, and Omsktransmash .. They lobbied government purchases exactly 72, and competitors gagged with their products. By absorbing both enterprises, the machine park was torn apart and the possibility of producing tanks was excluded. In addition, the factory staff of designers and technologists has been completely dispersed. And about BYLO_STALO, the changes are minimal!

[Bad_gr]

Quote: 113262

And about BYLO_STALO, the changes are minimal!

Bulwark
a thin sheet (cm?) covered half of the combat + the front of the tank
Replaced with armor + DZ for the entire front part and all combat + lattice protection of the motor
DZ "Contact-5" was replaced by "Relic"
The gunner's night sight was replaced with a thermal imager.

[113262a]

And I mean that! Non-brothers almost all of their 64 upgraded with thermal imagers, knives and screens with checkers - even on our equipment since 14 years! Has Omsk slipped to the level of the LPNR rembats?

[Bad_gr]

Quote: 113262

and screens with checkers

The bulwark on the T-80BVM is the same as on the T-90M - it is armor + DZ, although the evidence of DZ is not visible.

And the side tank is covered with some centimeter armor

Quote: 113262

Really Omsk slipped to the level of rembats

The development of special equipment is the same on it.
At UVZ, the management has changed relatively recently (as I understand it, now there are absolutely all managers) and how it will end for the enterprise is not clear.

[Alexey RA]

Quote: Bad_gr

"Gobbled up" - how's that? Redeemed and destroyed? How does he then produce tanks and special equipment?

Everything was complicated there. While Omsk was independent, UVZ drowned for The T-72 is the tank of the present, the T-90 is the tank of the future, and the T-80 has no future. And since UVZ had much more opportunities, Omsk was brought to the point of being absorbed.
Then, suddenly, it somehow happened that the T-80 turned out to be quite a modernized and modern machine - and Omsk again took up its usual business, but already as part of UVZ.

[Togilen]

wrong "was". In the photo as it was - 80U, and the BVM is sawing from the BV like a UE-1 with a UD tower

[Bad_gr]

Quote: Togilen

wrong "was". In the photo as it was - 80U, and the BVM is sawing from the BV like a UE-1 with a UD tower

T-80BV

The fact that it is with the BV they are being altered, I missed, thought any of the ones in storage.

[lopuhan2006]

Instead of produced, you should use a modernized tank that was already produced earlier. This is called a substitution of concepts, or misleading. Here either the low competence of the afftor, or the order from above.

[GELEZNII_KAPUT]

Quote: lopuhan2006

Instead of produced, you should use a modernized tank that was already produced earlier. This is called a substitution of concepts, or misleading. Here either the low competence of the afftor, or the order from above.

A common lie.

[lopuhan2006]

Rather, the general tendency is that when the Tu-16 is a strategic bomber, built for the fleet of 40 ships (of which 30 are boats), the Su-57 is the best, and it’s not even 10 in the stand, our nuclear weapons will crumble everyone; ZAO 30mm), Poseidon is already swimming everywhere and Petrel flies, every citizen will live to retirement, it's difficult for you, but you hold on ...

[lucul]

Rather, the general tendency is that when the Tu-16 is a strategic bomber, built for the fleet of 40 ships (of which 30 are boats), the Su-57 is the best, and it’s not even 10 in the stand, our nuclear weapons will crumble everyone; ZAO 30mm), Poseidon is already swimming everywhere and Petrel flies, every citizen will live to retirement, it's difficult for you, but you hold on ...

What is this stream of God's chosen consciousness? ))))

[lopuhan2006]

And why should a fool, or a torol guess about it))) Bile can go to the end)))

[lucul]

Bile can go to the end)))

Just about, you be careful with this)))

[lopuhan2006]

Criticize, offer! And libels and references to God's chosen ones (which my gods forbid I am not) do not need to throw too much mind)))

[rruvim]

I still don’t understand. Why tanks in the Arctic?

[lucul]

I still don’t understand. Why tanks in the Arctic?

And what, has the possible landing of the enemy, on the coast, already been canceled? ))))

[rruvim]

Are you laughing? What PROBABLE enemy can land in the Arctic in such a composition that it will be necessary to use tanks against him? Maybe a sabotage group, maximum. What tanks?

[rruvim]

What I mean is that the propaganda from the Ministry of Defense is broadcasting that the T-80BVM are "Arctic" tanks. Maybe they're just machines whose engines don't need much oxygen. So this, them, on the border with China.

[Bad_gr]

Quote: rruvim

What PROBABLE enemy can land in the Arctic in such a composition that it will be necessary to use tanks against him?

The border with Finland, and there the Swedes are on the side ... And we have a long northern border. In general, tanks will not be superfluous there.

[rruvim]

During the Great Patriotic War were tanks used on the Kola Peninsula? Nothing has changed since then. War, God forbid, will only be in the air!

[113262a]

Ask, why in the Arctic there are gas turbine tanks that start only from batteries? Who do not like frost sooooo!

[gorenina91]

- It is very pleasant to read about native Omsk ... - once mighty ... - and industrial and agricultural, scientific and cultural (only one Omsk "drama", what is ... - "Omsk State Academic Drama Theater". .. - four "Golden Masks" !!!)) ...
- Well, if we are talking about tanks ... - then the Omsk plant of transport engineering; earlier it was ... - Production Association "Transport Machine Building Plant" named after the October Revolution (now almost killed by the enemies of our Fatherland); at one time he worked very hard for the good of our Great Motherland (sorry for the pathos) and built so many T-80U tanks with a gas turbine engine that even today they can serve with might and main for the good of our Motherland (again pathetic .. -sorry) ... - although beyond the Arctic Circle ...
- I will keep silent about the beautiful unique Omsk tank "Black Eagle"; which the enemies of our long-suffering Fatherland ... - were also not allowed into production; and by the way, this wonderful tank "Black Eagle" could have been in service with Russia for 20 years already ... - There are video materials about this tank "Black Eagle" ... - those who wish can easily find them in search engines ...
- Well, the tanks T-80, T-80B, T-80BV, T-80BVK, T-80U, T-80U-M1; which were once produced by the Omsk Transport Engineering Plant named after the October Revolution ... - also a great respect ...

[113262a]

I subscribe to every word! As the eighty was the best tank in the world, it is! Toldko good impressions from him. Against the backdrop of everything else, this is a masterpiece! And they will be for a long time! (There is something to compare with!)