The Ministry of Defense of Ukraine has issued a training manual for the media with the "correct" terms for Donbass

The Main Intelligence Directorate of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine has released a special training manual for the media and social networks with the correct terms that must be used when describing the events in Donbass. This was reported on the page of the military department in Facebook.

The manual says that the conflict in Donbass should be described by a "single language" for the Ukrainian and Western media in order to exclude an information threat from Russia and to exclude pro-Russian propaganda cliches.

In order for Ukraine and the world to speak about the war "in a single language", it is necessary to use the appropriate terms that will form a media space close to reality. The same perception of war allows you to find solutions to problems faster and more effectively and avoid conflicts that are caused by the lack of a common understanding of events

- the text says.

For example, according to the manual, it is wrong to say: "territories of the self-proclaimed DPR / LPR", "southeast of Ukraine", it is correct to say: "temporarily occupied territories in Donetsk and Lugansk regions" or "occupied part of Donbass", etc.

Meanwhile, in the Armed Forces of Ukraine, Ukrainian military ranks are brought to NATO standards. The corresponding order was signed by the Minister of Defense of Ukraine Andriy Taran.

By order of the Minister of Defense of Ukraine, a list of NATO military ranks codes according to the NATO STANAG 2116 standard is being introduced. This list establishes the correspondence of the codification of military ranks of military personnel of the Armed Forces of Ukraine to NATO military ranks

- it is spoken in the message of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine.

Comments

[Avior]

... For example, according to the manual, it is wrong to say: “territories of the self-proclaimed DPR / LPR”, “southeast of Ukraine”, it is correct to say: “temporarily occupied territories in Donetsk and Luhansk regions” or “occupied part of Donbass”, etc.

We will see who will speak and how :))

[anjey]

Say "bacon" a thousand times, it won't taste better in your mouth

[Orange bigg]

In order for Ukraine and the world to speak about the war "in a single language", it is necessary to use the appropriate terms that will form a media space close to reality. The same perception of war allows you to find solutions to problems faster and more effectively and avoid conflicts that are caused by the lack of a common understanding of events

- the text says.

Che? Have they brought a new grass? Are they trying to form a media space close to their new reality? Maybe a new globe of Ukraine will be released with borders from Alpha Centauri to the Milky Way. Under such a topic you need to choose the appropriate terms in order to try to talk with the world as if about one reality.

[avg]

It would be 404 with a better education in the country, they would know the classics: “And you, friends, no matter how you sit down;
All are not good musicians. "

[figwam]

correspondence of the codification of military ranks of the military personnel of the Armed Forces of Ukraine to the military ranks of NATO

Here is such an independence, but as always there is nothing of our own, not even titles.

[Kuroneko]

Quote: anjey

Say "bacon" a thousand times, it won't taste better in your mouth

By order of the Minister of Defense of Ukraine, a list of NATO military ranks codes according to the NATO STANAG 2116 standard is being introduced. This list establishes the correspondence of the codification of military ranks of military personnel of the Armed Forces of Ukraine to NATO military ranks

Let the Ministry of Education 404 choose what is more in line with NATO standards.

[Insurgent]

Quote: Kuroneko

Let the Ministry of Education 404 choose what is more in line with NATO standards.

Apparently THIS:

The Ukrainian army uses 100% mashed potatoes produced by the Russian Federation, which "in fact is an aggressor state."

Director of "Vimal" (a private diversified enterprise engaged in crop growing, vegetable growing, grain production, logistics) Sergey Samonenko told about this in the news agency "Interfax-Ukraine" during the press conference "Potato colors of the domestic market of Ukraine".

According to him, all of the three existing lines for the production of mashed potatoes in Ukraine have stopped working.

Ukraine imports 100% of these products from abroad. This product is strategically important to meet the needs of the Ukrainian armed forces.

Now our army uses mashed potatoes produced in the Russian Federation

[Revolver]

Quote: Kuroneko

In fact, bacon (bacon) is the most appropriate in America for a product called "lard" in Russian.

[Kuroneko]

Quote: Nagan

In fact, bacon (bacon) is the most appropriate in America for a product called "lard" in Russian.

No, their bacon is our regular brisket.

[Mikhail m]

Quote: anjey

Say "bacon" a thousand times, it won't taste better in your mouth

Especially if the lard is Polish and Belarusian. Well, what kind of geniuses you have to be to bring Ukraine to the import of bacon and potatoes ...

[Insurgent]

Quote: Avior

We will see who will speak and how :))

And there is nothing to watch, they will yelp with one voice about the occupation, and those not many media outlets that dare to have a different opinion will persecute the Bandera-Nazis.

The Main Intelligence Directorate of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine has released a special training manual for the media and social networks with the correct terms

- training manual from the GRU MO Outskirts obligatory for execution.

[Tatyana]

Quote: Insurgent

And there is nothing to watch, they will yelp about the occupation with one voice, and those not many media outlets that dare to have a different opinion will persecute the Bandera-Nazis.

That's right!

Khuntashny Kiev Bandera Ukroreikh under Zelenskiy with his party of power "Servant of the People" provided a gag for all those who, in one way or another, can shed truthful light on Russophobia on the part of Ukrainian Nazis and on the civil war in Ukraine, as such.

[figwam]

"territories of the self-proclaimed DPR / LPR", "South-East of Ukraine"

Then, a dozen regions of the Russian Empire, caught by the Banderaites, will sound in a new way.

[Avior]

I meant on VO-sent agents will immediately surface, they have the same instructions. I see that they have already rushed to put cons to me :)

[tihonmarine]

Quote: Avior

I see that they have already rushed to put cons to me :)

Now they will pounce, they put a minus through the program with "scripts". They do not enter the dialogue, only the buttons are pressed. As always, "around the corner.

[tihonmarine]

Quote: Insurgent

And there is nothing to watch, they will yelp with one voice about the occupation, and those not many media outlets that dare to have a different opinion will persecute the Bandera-Nazis.

When Oles Buzina spoke the truth, he was simply killed, the perpetrators are known, but they are still free to walk. True, Ukraine does not need it. In pre-revolutionary publications you can find the truth about Ukraine, but under the USSR it was forbidden so as not to sow discord, and even now.
How many people know about the adventures of Sagaidachny and Doroshenko together with the prince Vladislav across Russia in 1617-1618.

[Sidor Amenpodestovich]

Ukraine is the only country where the cargo cult has become a state ideology.
This is what happens when savages are released into the pampas. They immediately climb onto the palm trees and start throwing poop.

[Andrea]

Territories of Donbass temporarily occupied by Ukraine.
This means that even the ICC recognized the conflict as a civil war.

[Avior]

A little bit wrong
Recognized both non-international and international

“The prosecutor’s office also provided additional information indicating the existence of a direct military confrontation between the armed forces of the Russian Federation and Ukraine, from which it follows that at the latest since July 14, 2014, in parallel with the non-international armed conflict, an international armed conflict took place in eastern Ukraine "

https://www.rline.tv/news/2017-12-08-gaagskiy-tribunal-priznal-mezhdunarodnym-konflikt-v-donbasse/

[Volder]

Quote: Avior

the prosecutor's office also provided additional information indicating the existence of a direct military confrontation between the armed forces of the Russian Federation and Ukraine

What kind of information? Did you try to dig deeper? Russia has not accepted the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court since 2016, because When considering cases and making conclusions regarding the conflict in Donbass and the status of Crimea, this court used exclusively one-sided information provided by Ukraine. The court did not bother itself with checking that "information". That is, there is no objectivity and impartiality, and the Russian Foreign Ministry has generally stated that the court is not independent.

[Avior]

The Russian Federation signed the Rome Statute, but later withdrew the signature and did not ratify it. Ukraine has not ratified the statute either, but has given its consent to the consideration of cases in Donbass and Crimea.
For Russia, decisions of the ICC are not binding.
But practically all of Europe has ratified and for Europe the decisions of the ICC will be legal and enforceable, and those who are sentenced will face big problems in Europe.
A quote is taken from a site close to the Communist Party.

[Volder]

Quote: Avior

Ukraine has not ratified the statute either, but has agreed to consider cases in the Donbass and Crimea.

In the sense of giving consent? Who, if not Ukraine, applied to the ICC?

For Russia, decisions of the ICC are not binding.

What decision of the ICC Russia supposedly should comply with? Not interested?

for Europe, the decisions of the ICC will be legal and enforceable, and those who are sentenced will face big problems in Europe.

European countries will not have any problems, because de jure, they have nothing to do with what is happening in the Donbass and Crimea. Their only role in the international arena is to consolidate the international legal status of the Minsk Agreements-2.

[Avior]

1. You can accept the Rome statute and the ICC will consider all cases concerning the territory and citizens of the state, or you can give consent to the consideration of some specific cases on the territory of the state. Any of the parties can be accused in this case, the ICC itself conducts a preliminary investigation.
2. For the Russian Federation, decisions of the ICC are not binding, with the exception of cases possibly considered on the initiative of the UN Security Council and those cases if Russia agrees to consider cases concerning its territory. But Russia can agree to the consideration of some cases, then decisions on these cases will be binding on it.
3. Problems will arise not for Europe, but for those who will be included in the ICC verdict, since for almost all European countries the ICC decisions are binding. This means that if the ICC found you guilty of a war crime, for example, then for Europe you automatically become a war criminal with all the ensuing consequences.

[Volder]

Quote: Avior

You can give consent to the consideration of some specific cases on the territory of the state.

Ukraine initiating consideration of the case in Crimea and Donbass? Or are its Western curators deciding everything for Ukraine?

The ICC itself is conducting a preliminary investigation.

The investigation is purely paper, that is, it is a request for information to each person involved in the case. But Russia, most likely, did not respond to the request (it did not provide information). Therefore, the decisions of the ICC in this case are sewn with white threads, since based solely on information from Ukraine.

if the ICC found you guilty of a war crime, for example, then for Europe you automatically become a war criminal with all the ensuing consequences

What are the consequences? When charged with war crimes, a penalty must be imposed. What kind of punishment has the ICC imposed on Russia? Required all European countries to impose sanctions? That is, sanctions are not voluntary, but exclusively compulsory?

[Avior]

1 The ICC is conducting an investigation, and who originally contacted is irrelevant in this case.
2 The prosecutor of the ICC independently conducts an investigation within the jurisdiction and you can give your explanations, present evidence, etc., but the fact that you do not do this does not affect the course of the case. As in a regular court, you can give your explanations and evidence, you can refuse, the case does not stop.
3 consequences for those found guilty, essno
And the decisions of the court will be recognized by all who have signed and ratified the Rome Statute, as well as the decisions of the national courts.

[Volder]

Quote: Avior

who originally applied does not matter in this case.

That is, you do not know who applied. Then we will think that this is the USA.

Quote: Avior

As in a regular court - you can give your explanations and evidence, you can refuse - this case does not stop.

I did not say anything about the termination of the investigation. I told you something else. Reread.

And the decisions of the court will be recognized by all who have signed and ratified the Rome Statute, as well as the decisions of the national courts.

For God's sake! Russia deeply does not care about their decisions, so we stopped our participation in the statute. You did not answer my question about what specific consequences and punishments for Russia are we talking about.

[Avior]

That is, you do not know who applied and do not understand the essence of the appeal.
What you said about something else, I gave you an answer long ago. The signatories to the Rome statute introduced it into their legislator's system.
And third, does the ICC judge Russia?
Why don't you reread what I wrote to you?

[Volder]

Quote: Avior

That is, you do not know who applied

Yes, I don't know, that's why I'm asking you. Do not hesitate to share information.

What you said about something else - I gave you the answer long ago.

I can repeat, it's not difficult for me: The investigation is purely paper, that is, it is a request for information to each person involved in the case. But Russia, most likely, did not respond to the request (it did not provide information). Therefore, the decisions of the ICC in this case are sewn with white threads, since based solely on information from Ukraine. You don't think that ICC prosecutors themselves traveled to Donbass and Crimea to check the primary sources?

does the ICC judge Russia?

And who is being tried there? If Russia is not judged, then our state and statesmen have nothing to do with it! We have nothing to do with either Crimea or Donbass, right? I really don't know who was sued and punished there. Enlighten, please.

[Avior]

No one was sued. The trial has not yet begun while the prosecutor's investigation is ongoing.
About what is sewn with white threads, this is purely your statement, absurd due to the fact that there is no ICC decision yet. Just as absurd is your statement that the fact that any party did not exercise its right to provide an explanation casts doubt on the investigation or the lawsuit.
As for who applied, you misunderstand the essence of the process. Ukraine has agreed to the jurisdiction of the court in certain cases on its territory, in the Crimea, Donbass and the events on the Maidan. And at the moment, the ICC prosecutor's office is investigating these events. So do you understand?

[Volder]

Quote: Avior

No one was sued. The trial has not yet begun while the prosecutor's investigation is ongoing.

Well, you yourself wrote that the ICC admitted in 2016 that there was an international armed conflict in the east of Ukraine. That is, the decision has already been made, or not yet? If there is still no conviction with punitive measures, then what is the point of appealing to this court? The prosecutor can say whatever he wants, but the last word is up to the judge.

About what is sewn with white threads - this is purely your statement, absurd due to the fact that there is no ICC decision yet.

I explained to you why the decision of this court will be biased and biased. I can repeat it for the third time, if you stubbornly don’t understand: the case materials are based exclusively on one-sided Ukrainian information, without any verification on the territory of Crimea and Donbass by the ICC prosecutor. Russia does not participate in this show. The ICC decision in this case will be sewn with white threads. It is absurd to think otherwise.

Just as absurd is your statement that the fact that any party did not exercise its right to provide an explanation - it casts doubt on the investigation or the lawsuit.

In this case, an investigation without taking into account all factors and facts, of course, is doubtful. And can be easily challenged. However, Russia will not appeal against anything, tk. she deeply does not care about this ICC and everything that it does there.

As for who applied, you misunderstand the essence of the process.

So who applied to the ICC with a statement to investigate the events in Crimea, Donbass and Maidan? You don't seem to know anything either.

[Andrei Nikolaevich]

What nonsense, this ,, manual ,,

[Orange bigg]

Poles have a map of a Pole, and Ukrainians will have a manual of a Ukrainian (Ukrainian reality) with the appropriate terms so that at least someone in the world would somehow try to understand them. Their age-old uncompromising struggle with reality.

[Revolver]

Quote: OrangeBigg

Ukrainians will have a manual of a Ukrainian (Ukrainian reality) with appropriate terms

Is it like the Chinese have Mao's quotation book, obligatory for constant wearing, studying, and memorizing by heart?

[BIABIA]

Don't go there, go here. Do not call it that, call it differently. From zhezh .....

[YOUR]

Insanity grows stronger

[Vitaly Pogrebnyak]

Well, so what?

[Volder]

Sick people. There are no occupation troops of the Russian regular Army in Donbas and never have been. There is no evidence of their presence there. Fear has big eyes, especially when there are no victories. Several people caught with Russian passports are not servicemen of the Russian regular troops. These are just volunteers in purchased camouflage uniforms, retirees (who quit the RF Armed Forces). Soldiers and officers never carry passports with them, especially when performing a combat mission. Those who have served in the army should know about this.
Note: Volunteers are individuals who are not subordinate to either state or private structures (as a rule - former military personnel, retired to the reserve), but who fulfill unofficial requests from someone in a war zone.
Why are the Ukrainian authorities and the Ukrainian Defense Ministry afraid to call things by their proper names, preferring politicized false rhetoric? The fact is that if Russia's aggression is recognized as non-existent, then all the "heroes" of Ukraine will have to be deprived of awards, privileges, the title of "ATO veteran," and veteran payments. The Bandera nationalists will definitely not like this.
The conflict in Donbass is a civil war within the state, because Donbass belongs to Ukraine. The exchange of prisoners is full of citizens of Ukraine. In the Minsk Agreements-2, official Kiev recognized the civil nature of the conflict. A unanimous vote in the UN for a resolution in support of a set of measures to implement the "Agreements" raised the status of this document to international law. And Kiev, having signed this set of measures, has been sabotaging the implementation of "Agreements-5" for 2 years. The war ended in February 2015 with the surrender of Kiev, but with an euphonious name ... And the fact that the Ukrainian government cannot and does not want to come to an agreement with its own citizens, oppressing them as Russian speakers is a shame for the whole world!
The soldiers of the Armed Forces of Ukraine took an oath of allegiance to the Ukrainian people. But in Donbass Ukrainians are dying from the actions of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. How does this oath fit in with the actions of the Ukrainian Armed Forces soldiers? Constitution of Ukraine, article 17: no one can use the Armed Forces of Ukraine to limit the rights of citizens. In fact: in the Donbas, the Armed Forces are used to restrict the right to life. Yes, there is an "anti-terrorist law". But what is more priority: the Constitution or some law, if they conflict with each other? The Ukrainian Armed Forces are not afraid to shoot at the citizens of Ukraine, violating the military oath. But they are afraid to shoot at Crimea - they know that they will receive an answer in the form of a war with the Russian Federation and thus lose their statehood.
As long as aggressive nationalists are raging in Ukraine, and the authorities are passing laws against the Russian language, Donbass will not become de facto Ukrainian. Residents of the DPR and LPR, as well as Crimea, do not consider Russia an aggressor and occupier - this is the main thing. But for these local residents everything has already been decided in the West and in Ukraine, imposing an infringing position on them.

[tihonmarine]

"temporarily occupied territories in Donetsk and Luhansk regions" or "occupied part of Donbass", etc.
True, there are still such territories occupied by Ukraine.

[El Chuvachino]

Welcome to 1984

[cniza]

Meanwhile, in the Armed Forces of Ukraine, Ukrainian military ranks are brought to NATO standards. The corresponding order was signed by the Minister of Defense of Ukraine Andriy Taran.

Yes, even if you pass the standards to Papua New Guinea, how will this help the army?

[Vladimir61]

Defeat is heroic resistance.
The boiler is a desire to sign the next Minsk agreement.
Flight - avoiding conflict with civilians.
Surrender - open reconnaissance of enemy forces.
Desertion is the propaganda of the separatists.

[APASUS]

Meanwhile, in the Armed Forces of Ukraine, Ukrainian military ranks are brought to NATO standards. The corresponding order was signed by the Minister of Defense of Ukraine Andriy Taran.
By order of the Minister of Defense of Ukraine, a list of NATO military ranks codes according to the NATO STANAG 2116 standard is being introduced. This list establishes the correspondence of the codification of military ranks of military personnel of the Armed Forces of Ukraine to NATO military ranks
- it is spoken in the message of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine.

Here's a bad luck, a mistake came out! According to the latest regulations for the NATO standard STANAG 2116, one must say:
The Pentagon of Ukraine, not the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine

[Igoresha]

yandex.ua banned in UA and says -Ordlo, "militants", "terrorists", because "DPR", the so-called "Republic" - go and the Moscow authorities approve