Deadlines for the end of state tests of the robotic complex "Uran-9"

21
Deadlines for the end of state tests of the robotic complex "Uran-9"

State tests of the Russian robotic complex (RTK) Uran-9 will be completed in 2020. This was announced by the Commander-in-Chief of the Ground Forces, General of the Army Oleg Salyukov, in an interview with the Krasnaya Zvezda newspaper.

According to the Commander-in-Chief of the Ground Forces, at present, the development of a number of robotic platforms of various classes is continuing for use in the units of the Ground Forces, including the "Shturm" and "Companion" complexes of the heavy and medium classes. At the same time, state tests of the Uran-9 complex should be completed by the end of 2020.



This year, the state tests of the Uran-9 combat RTK are being completed. At the same time, in order to form high-tech units of the Ground Forces, work continues on the creation of ground-based RTKs of heavy and middle class

- added Salyukov.

The Uran-9 complex was adopted by the Russian army in 2016, however, during the experimental combat operation of the complex, shortcomings were found in control, mobility, firepower, reconnaissance and observation functions. There was a low reliability of the undercarriage, unstable operation of the 30-mm gun, untimely operation of the launch circuits, as well as the failure of the thermal imaging channel of the optical sighting station. In addition, the military made claims about the inability Robot shoot on the move.

In the spring of last year, the Ministry of Defense announced the modernization of the complex and the elimination of deficiencies. The modified car was sent for testing.

The Uran-9 complex includes two tracked combat vehicles with remote control, a control point and transport for their transportation. The basic armament of combat vehicles consists of an automatic 30-mm cannon 2A72 and a coaxial 7,62-mm machine gun, anti-tank guided missiles "Attack" and a jet flamethrower "Shmel". Depending on the tasks performed, the complex can be additionally armed with MANPADS.
21 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    9 December 2020 12: 23
    In general, a remotely controlled unit can hardly be called robotic. This was implemented back in the 30s of the last century, although at that level of development of electronics and telemechanics.
    1. +8
      9 December 2020 12: 28
      The target designation and the command to open fire must still remain with the person. UAV against this background is also an idea of ​​the 30s.
    2. +7
      9 December 2020 12: 59
      In general, a remotely controlled unit can hardly be called robotic. E

      And others are not yet in the troops. Not at all. Nowhere.
      1. -8
        9 December 2020 13: 41
        This is rubbish.
        Radio-controlled trough.
        Suitable only for smoking a couple of militants hiding in the hut.
        1. +1
          9 December 2020 15: 44
          This tin can will fit in any forest.
          In an open area, even a small-caliber machine gun will send him to scrap metal.
          The sniper will disable the optics.

          Well, in order to manage this crap, it must emit. So it won't be difficult to destroy this stupidity.
          Well, do not forget the electronic warfare.

          This misunderstanding is creeping along the ground. Pedestrian speed. Don't hide, don't hide.

          For the pampering of young schoolchildren engineers, this is a good thing.
          To master the budget, just a find.

          And for the conduct of hostilities, this thing is harmful because it will take time and the result will be disastrous.

          Who will it fight with? With a tank? With BMP?

          Apparently only with the civilian population.
          The guard to break up demonstrations?
          But even there they will burn with a Molotov bottle /
      2. -5
        9 December 2020 23: 49
        Quote: bk316
        And others are not yet in the troops. Not at all. Nowhere.

        What are you talking about? About a dozen countries have been armed with robotic systems with the possibility of full autonomy for 10 years already .. How good it is in your world, neither YouTube, nor world news, to watch only Ren-TV and central channels.
        There are no Boston Dynamic mixes, no Northrop Group, no Reinmetal, etc., but ours created a radio-controlled cart, wound a bunch of trunks and again ahead of the rest of the planet .. Hurray? Hooray!
        Only such carts have already been made even by Estonians and Ukrainians ..
        1. +1
          11 December 2020 14: 46
          About a dozen countries have been armed with robotic systems with full autonomy for 10 years already.

          Well, will you send a link to the combat autonomous systems?
          In reality, there is exactly one - and it is ours. Guess which one laughing
          1. -2
            11 December 2020 19: 50
            Quote: bk316

            In reality, there is exactly one - and it is ours. Guess which one laughing

            Oh, will you tell me about the Perimeter now?
            1. 0
              12 December 2020 23: 25
              Oh, will you tell me about the Perimeter now?

              I don't know anything about the perimeter, but I strongly doubt it. The fact is that automatic decision-making systems, which is the perimeter, have nothing to do with autonomous combat systems at all, they are perpendicular to them. And they have been in the army for many decades. For example, the anti-ship missiles themselves decide which ship of the order to attack, and the air defense system in which order to fire at targets. It looks like you are not in the subject at all, even at the level of concepts. Well continue your mantras about rheinmetal.
              1. The comment was deleted.
    3. 0
      9 December 2020 14: 26
      Quote: 210ox
      In general, a remotely controlled unit can hardly be called robotic. This was implemented back in the 30s of the last century,

      Then your "unit" could maintain a given course and a specified route? Could he drive several turns or bend around obstacles on his own?
      Could capture a target and hold it with subsequent destruction (by permission)?
      1. 0
        9 December 2020 18: 53
        Quote: Genry
        Quote: 210ox
        In general, a remotely controlled unit can hardly be called robotic. This was implemented back in the 30s of the last century,

        Then your "unit" could maintain a given course and a specified route? Could he drive several turns or bend around obstacles on his own?
        Could capture a target and hold it with subsequent destruction (by permission)?


        But can this device now?

        He himself can do exactly as much as is included in the software for quadcopters.
        Move along the points set on the map.
        He does not know how to bend obstacles.

        Все.
        He himself cannot do anything else.
        Everything else is done by human hands through a radio channel.
        1. -1
          10 December 2020 01: 51
          Quote: SovAr238A
          But can this device now?

          He himself can do exactly as much as is included in the software for quadcopters.
          Move along the points set on the map.
          He does not know how to bend obstacles.

          Uranus-9 can have much more processing power than a primitive quadrocopter, which has severe restrictions on weight, volume and energy. Therefore, all the necessary automation technologies are incorporated into Uran-9.
  2. 0
    9 December 2020 12: 59
    This is how you look at our electronics, the field is not plowed to the clock, but funds do not go there, which is why it is interesting, because with the advent of various types of UAVs, robots on the battlefield, the demand for aiming systems, detection, scanning sensors will be colossal
    1. 0
      9 December 2020 17: 57
      Why don't they come? They are coming. It's just that the problem is that you yourself said "unplowed field".
      There are a lot of directions. And you need to master everything gradually and prioritizing.
      1. +1
        10 December 2020 10: 24
        Quote: Alexander Vorontsov
        There are a lot of directions.

        Chipsets, sensors, controllers, they are in the rocket, in the TV
  3. +1
    9 December 2020 13: 17
    Judging by the article, everything depends on the quality of the components, and not on fundamental flaws. Until the quality is raised, they will be busy.
  4. 0
    9 December 2020 16: 30
    For the development of the industry and the fight against "entrenched" terrorists. For the time being, there is no need to think about the introduction of this crude technology into the troops.
  5. 0
    9 December 2020 21: 47
    Quote: Temples
    This tin can will fit in any forest.
    In an open area, even a small-caliber machine gun will send him to scrap metal.
    The sniper will disable the optics.

    Well, in order to manage this crap, it must emit. So it won't be difficult to destroy this stupidity.
    Well, do not forget the electronic warfare.

    This misunderstanding is creeping along the ground. Pedestrian speed. Don't hide, don't hide.

    For the pampering of young schoolchildren engineers, this is a good thing.
    To master the budget, just a find.

    And for the conduct of hostilities, this thing is harmful because it will take time and the result will be disastrous.

    Who will it fight with? With a tank? With BMP?

    Apparently only with the civilian population.
    The guard to break up demonstrations?
    But even there they will burn with a Molotov bottle /

    You have not yet seen how, up to su-57, a man ran over a cliff with flapping wings. The young ladies stood nearby and thought what kind of fucking ...
  6. -1
    10 December 2020 09: 20
    He had already fought in Syria. There was a picture in a desert coloring against the backdrop of Middle Eastern buildings.