Sukhoi has completed a long-term contract for the supply of Su-34

The Sukhoi company has completed a long-term contract for the supply of the Ministry of Defense of Su-34 fighter-bombers. According to the press service of the United Aircraft Corporation (UAC), the final batch of aircraft has been manufactured and tested.

Sukhoi has completed another long-term contract for the supply of a batch of Su-34 fighter-bombers to the Russian Ministry of Defense

- said in a statement.

According to the general director of the UAC, the general director of the Sukhoi company Yuri Slyusar, about a hundred Su-34 bombers were manufactured and handed over to the military under the completed contract. The company is now embarking on a three-year contract for 20 front-line Su-34 bombers, signed in early summer this year. Within the framework of this agreement, all Su-34s will be produced in a standard version with certain changes made according to the operating experience of previously purchased bombers.

Another contract for a modernized version of the bomber is planned to be signed in 2021. According to him, the Ministry of Defense intends to receive 76 modernized Su-34M bombers by 2027.

All Su-34s under the new contract will be produced according to the modernized version as part of the Sych experimental design program, completed in 2019. This upgrade includes an avionics upgrade, the installation of precision weapons and a set of several suspended reconnaissance containers.

Comments

[Sofa batyr]

Another contract for a modernized version of the bomber is planned to be signed in 2021. According to him, the Ministry of Defense intends to receive 76 modernized Su-34M bombers by 2027.

So do not wait, on January 2021, XNUMX and sign.

[Orange bigg]

Looking for a reason to celebrate January 1st?

[Sofa batyr]

Quote: OrangeBigg

Looking for a reason to celebrate January 1st?

Why are there any other reasons for the official New Year celebrated on December 31 - January 1?

[alexmach]

There are also reasons why they are pulling and how much they have contracted with "minimal changes". The project of the SU-20M is apparently not ready.

[VO3A]

It's not that simple there. Obviously, the engine must be changed on the plane, especially since it is, and it would not hurt to expand the rocket armament. It would be nice to lower the ESR. But it is clear that all this will remain overboard.
The Su-34 has such a modernization potential that it will take your breath away. Up to the point that on its basis it is possible to make a STEALTH version with the placement of weapons in the internal compartment between the engines, and the latter can be removable in order to also carry the strategic missile and all the others ... The costs are minimal, and the efficiency can be obtained huge ... Especially since PAK YES is again molded into a monster, this is not right ...

[alexmach]

Yes, the time for a large-scale modernization of fourth-generation aircraft has come and the need is ripe. But there is one more thing - the modernization project is needed, including with an eye to the copies that are now in service. They still have decades to serve and it is necessary to raise the characteristics to the modern level, and preferably for a reasonable price. And the same stealth version is rather a new aircraft on the old base.

[VO3A]

I agree ! The Tu-22M3 (M3M) will die in 10 years, no modernization will save it, the Su-24M will be written off in 10 years, the aircraft of generation 2/3 is very expensive and old, the Tu-95 will not fly forever either ... All these aircraft will be replaced Su-34 (M) ... We believe that 300 units will be needed to replace ... And in ten years they will make about 100 Su-34 (M) .. We are already at the "broken trough" ... The pace of creation should not even be increased 2, and 3 times ... we will not touch the Tu-160, we will assume that it will be replaced by PAK YES ...

[alexmach]

M .. yes, not quite like that. I don't agree with everything.
First of all, it will definitely not be able to replace the Tu-95. Here, rather, there is hope for PAK YES. As for the Tu-22m3, it is also not entirely clear whether the replacement is equivalent.
Secondly, about increasing production, there are also objections, because there are already about 200 in stock. Well, here's another hundred and will make your target 300. Much more important than them, including the existing ones, modernize for urgent tasks and weapons and use them rationally. And there is nothing to increase the output without having a clearly delineated appearance or appearance and concept of application.

[Boris Chernikov]

Well, in Kazan, as they said ... that first the modernization of the Tu-22m3m, then the launch of a new aircraft based on the Tu-22m3m, but there, apparently, the revision will take into account the operation + an expanded missile compartment in order to place new missiles ..

[alexmach]

then the launch of a new aircraft based on Tu-22m3m

What other new car based on Tu-22m3 then and why? Those that have machines and projects would be brought to mind, including PAK DA and TU-160m.

[Boris Chernikov]

well, at the roll-out of the Tu-22m3m they mentioned this ... yes, and the situation itself begs to be released ... The car is simpler than the Tu-160, cheaper and taking into account the need for missile-carrying naval aviation + aircraft for launching promising X-50 and GZUR ... in fact ... PAK YES project, which at best will enter the troops in 10-12 years, the Tu-160M ​​is expensive and difficult to manufacture, so it's easier to rivet 10 new Tu-225s (mentioned under this index) than 5 Tu-160Ms ...

[alexmach]

The machine is simpler than the Tu-160

How is it easier then? The same variable sweep wing, the same engines (if by the mind, of course), the requirements for avionics are very similar. Is there no titanium case? It is better to let at least the production of Tu-160m be mastered. What else to undertake for one project. There are too many types of aircraft in service.

+ aircraft for launching promising X-50

Don't confuse this, it's more likely that the X-50 is needed for launching from aircraft with smaller bomb bays. And not vice versa. If you build a new plane, then the size of the internal compartments can be increased.

[Boris Chernikov]

1) that the Tu-225 is simpler due to the lack of titanium, due to the fact that there are 2 engines, and not 4, therefore it is simpler and cheaper ... For understanding ... in 2 years the Tu-22M made 500+ cars, and the Tu -160 in 10 years 35 cars ... with a difference in terms of 2 times the number of boards the difference is not even several times, but more than an order of magnitude ...
2) The X-50 fits into the Tu-22M3M really, but, for example, the X-101 does not fit there anymore, which is why it is said that replacing the Tu-22M3M will be able to launch the entire range of missiles due to the increased missile compartment ..

[VO3A]

Where did you get 200? Only 4 regiments, about 120 Su-34! We have about 270 Su-24M units, and 67 Tu-22M3 units! So my math is correct! This is the minimum amount! What's the concept? Su-34 is a carrier of nuclear weapons, like the Su-24M - this is its main purpose !!!
https://aviation21.ru/sostav-boevogo-aviaparka-vks-rossii-na-2020-god/

[alexmach]

Where did you get 200? Only 4 regiments, about 120 Su-34!

Yes, I was wrong. for some reason he thought that there were already about two hundred of them in the ranks, apparently he counted those that would only be contracted.

What's the concept? Su-34 is a carrier of nuclear weapons, like the Su-24M - this is its main purpose !!!

Come on, we need to prepare for non-nuclear conflicts as well. And above they themselves wrote about the wide possibilities of upgrading the platform and different ways of using them, for example, the idea of ​​using them in MPA is popular.

[Berkut752]

Young and zealous, to write off everything and the Su-34, rivet with modifications ................ DO NOT HURRY.
As in the joke "NOW LET'S LOWER, ALL THE HERD IS PER ........ YOM"
Tu-22, not yet time, not yet night.
And the Tu-160, generally new, after the last upgrade. You probably have never been to ARZ. DON'T KNOW what is being done to them ..................
And VOOOOOOOSCHE, let there be many, BEAUTIFUL AND LETHAL, for the enemy.

[VO3A]

Where is young? Okay handsome! They will fall apart by themselves! Su-24M is an ancient kerosene fighter! There is nothing to replace him, but he replaces the entire IBA out of hopelessness ... And this is in addition to his tasks ... Tu-22M3 barely breathes, this is not a resource aircraft, their wings will fall off at the turning knot, and even so there are only 67, even 30 for a useless modernization they will not find ... Nothing will happen, we are already only with postscripts in the 2nd place in the world in VKS aircraft ...
https://aviation21.ru/sostav-boevogo-aviaparka-vks-rossii-na-2020-god/
https://militaryarms.ru/armii-mira/vvs-rossii/
Compare these two open sources and you will understand everything ...
And for complete fun:
https://sdelanounas.ru/blogs/131457/

[Letun]

Quote: VO3A

Tu-95 will also not fly forever ... All these aircraft will be replaced by the Su-34 (M) ...

You can immediately see a modernizer from God Il-76 and Ka-32, Su-34 (M) will not replace the heap? You can also try to drive instead of the Tu-154. Why waste time on trifles

[VO3A]

And the brains of someone, at the same time! And there is only one Tu-154 in the Aerospace Forces!

[Bersaglieri]

Yes, conformal containers for the Duckling are just that. Perfectly "sit" on the extended frame on the 27th. And radar upgrade is a sacred cause. Great plane!

[Boris Chernikov]

rather, the fact is that Sukhoi delivered all the ducklings to the customer ahead of time

[Boris Chernikov]

well, the current contract for 20 cars is designed so that there is no downtime at the plant

[Hunter 2]

Nice to read such news! Thanks and Good Luck to the Aircraft Manufacturers Excellent SU 34 Car !!!

[Clear]

Quote: Hunter 2

Nice to read such news! Thanks and Good Luck to the Aircraft Manufacturers Excellent SU 34 Car !!!

Yes, now we need to make changes to the famous song "... I'm not Charlie, I'm SU-34!"

Greetings, Alex

[Sofa batyr]

Quote: Clear

Yes, now we need to make changes to the famous song "... I'm not Charlie, I'm SU-34!"

Have you forgotten in what context our Su-24 is mentioned in this song?

Don't change anything in the song. It is only necessary to do something so that none of the "partner friends" dared to allow such actions in relation to us, on land, in the air and at sea ...

[Clear]

Quote: Divan-batyr

Quote: Clear

Yes, now we need to make changes to the famous song "... I'm not Charlie, I'm SU-34!"

Have you forgotten in what context our Su-24 is mentioned in this song?

Don't change anything in the song. It is only necessary to do something so that none of the "partner friends" dared to allow such actions in relation to us, on land, in the air and at sea ...

There is only one context - faster, higher, more accurate! "

[Sofa batyr]

Quote: Clear

There is only one context - faster, higher, more accurate! "

Obviously, you are either not healthy, or slept badly ...
Now, after this addition, there is no doubt that you do not quite understand what you are writing about.

[Hunter 2]

Greetings Clear Sad song, unfortunately, the video is very good! Eternal memory to the Flyers - to the Warriors who have done their duty with dignity!

[VO3A]

Nice car ... And bad news! Few, very few! And it's not about the builders ...
"It will not be enough!"

[Alexfly]

20 in three years? However, we are walking by leaps and bounds ...

[kit88]

Let me ask you how much is needed to be "seven-league"? Based on the military-political situation in order to solve the assigned tasks in the conditional theater of operations.

[venik]

Quote: kit88

Let me ask you how much is needed to be "seven-league"? Based on the military-political situation in order to solve the assigned tasks in the conditional theater of operations.

========
It only remains to add: "And given the fact that the combatant Su-24 have not yet worked out their resource" .....

[VO3A]

How did they not work out? They have a designated resource for 30 years! Only on extension fly! That's it, they are planning to write off everything within 10 years ... This is also not a resource aircraft, since it has a PChK .... It is listed as 270, but only 75 flies ... Why engage in eyewash ?! If not for SVP-24 "Hephaestus", they would have been written off long ago ...

[venik]

Quote: VO3A

How did they not work out? They have a designated resource for 30 years!

=========
But the serial production was discontinued only in 1993 (that is, it has not yet been developed for the last serial cars!). Well, there are still a number of cars upgraded to the M2 level plus machines with an extended resource ..... Well, they will serve for a few more years, And there they will gradually replace the "ducklings" ...

[Alexfly]

Russia, it seems to me, is a huge country. And it is necessary to defend not only Moscow, but also the Far East, North, South and West. 120 airplanes are clearly not enough ... Su-24 is a consumable material, since it does not fulfill its task on its own. Or are stories about the successes of kamikaze still warming your soul?

[Alexey RA]

Quote: AlexFly

20 in three years? However, we are walking by leaps and bounds ...

The contract for the Su-34M is just on its way.

Another contract for a modernized version of the bomber is planned to be signed in 2021. According to him, the Ministry of Defense intends to receive 76 modernized Su-34M bombers by 2027.

Therefore, it was decided to order less non-modernized cars.

[Reviews]

I wonder if you can finish it off with the S-70? There is also a second person so that the pilot is not distracted. It will help you to hit the ground, and can accompany you if you teach us how to carry a long-range UR-explosive. Eh, dreams ...

[KCA]

If the S-70 goes from a demonstrator to an experienced one, it is most likely possible, an open architecture, as it were, and there will be enough space for additional blocks with a margin

[Reviews]

Quote: KCA

If the S-70 goes from a demonstrator to an experienced one, it is most likely possible, an open architecture, as it were, and there will be enough space for additional blocks with a margin

I'm talking about the Su-34 - is that place left in it? And, most importantly, the customer's desire?

[KCA]

Proceeding from the fact that there was a place for a microwave and there is an opportunity to stand at full height during the flight, there will be a place for a block, which, most likely, will not be more than 25x25x25cm, and the customer's desire should call the S-70 demonstrator

[Reviews]

Quote: KCA

no more than 25x25x25cm

It’s hard to believe that this volume will be enough, despite all the modern miniaturization. There is not only the actual control of the drone, but also two-way data transmission, and control of the weapon. These are two new transceivers, at least.

[KCA]

A new transceiver is not needed, communication in the general information network of fighters, IB, A-50 (100), ground services, and everything else, it is enough to assign an ID to the drone, for controlling weapons, of course, your own separate communication channel is also not needed , communication is not analog, but digital, through one communication channel at one frequency, or at variable frequencies, you can maintain and control / receive instructions with hundreds of different devices / devices

[Reviews]

Quote: KCA

A new transceiver is not needed, communication in the general information network of fighters, IB, A-50 (100), ground services, and everything else, it is enough to assign an ID to the drone to control the weapon

... and for piloting it. And not only give him commands - he is out of visual visibility - but also receive flight telemetry from him.

[KCA]

The S-70, or its analogs, will not be piloted by the SU-57 or the SU-34, I can hardly imagine how one SU-57 pilot flies himself, and also controls the drone, not in vain over the airfield, and most likely not only above it, the C-70 flew and landed in a completely autonomous mode, without the participation of the operator, the pilot sets the course, the target, then the C-70 flies on its own, giving information only about the detection of a target or extraneous targets, about the readiness for launch, if not given the command for automatic start, the telemetry will not be accurately transmitted, unless at the request of the pilot

[OgnennyiKotik]

The question is solved by a hanging container. Su-34 is ideal for working with slave UAVs.

[serg.shishkov2015]

I like this plane! Therefore, the news is pleasant!

[Raven 95]

And the barmaley like it!
Well, at least there were no complaints from them.

[serg.shishkov2015]

Superfluous confirmation of the thesis - a beautiful weapon fights well!

[Smirnoff]

The Ministry of Defense intends to receive 76 modernized Su-34M bombers by 2027

Earlier, a contract was signed for 76 Su-57s. Not a bad load for aircraft factories

[RUSLAN]

This morning at "Zvezda" they talked about the Su-34m, they want to teach him how to fight on equal terms with fighters!

[Escobar]

I wonder if there will be supplies for the interests of the fleet? They can also install anti-ship missiles x-35. The aircraft carrier will certainly not sink, but the frigates can be put to the bottom, and I think there will be enough potential to limit the combat capability of destroyers

[faiver]

The company is now embarking on a three-year contract for 20 Su-34 front-line bombers.

- What is it like? I hope the factory still has some contracts, otherwise it's funny ... although no, it's not funny ...

[alexmach]

- What is it like? I hope the factory still has some contracts, otherwise it's funny ... although no, it's not funny ...

This is solely for "maintaining the pants" of the plant. From the next year he was supposed to start producing something civil. MS-21 or what? But he's not ready.
Well, contracts for servicing the Su-34 + previously delivered to the troops, again, their modernization, should also come up.

[Jacket in stock]

If the upgrade topic is complete, why build 20 more obsolete machines?
Wouldn't it be more logical to start a new batch immediately on a new project?

[Reviews]

Well, for example, because the series has not yet been deployed ...

avionics, (...) precision weapons and a set of several suspended reconnaissance containers.

[Comrade I]

Eh, still 76 for naval aviation to order.

[Vladimir Vladimirovich S]

Need more "Ducklings" - 34M, more for videoconferencing

[Maxwrx]

I am for unification and economy!
Upgrading the Su-30 (already planned) for new engines, afar and avionics. This is a multifunctional fighter that will not need to be covered like a Su-34, and it will be cheaper. It is also purchased by the Navy. Buy in bulk
Making the Su-35/57 is a full-fledged fighter
MiG-29k - for an aircraft carrier
To make an analogue in terms of load and overall dimensions of the Tu-22m3, only with much more economical engines. It will replace the Tu-160 and Tu-22m3 itself. Our missiles are firing already 3000 km away. Supersonic speed and combat radius are no longer so important.
Write off all other aircraft as the resource depletes / becomes obsolete

The unified fleet will make it possible to increase the real number of aircraft by 1,2-1,3 times for this price. R&D costs 2-3 times.

[Castro Ruiz]

SU-34M priam naprashivaetsa v MRA.