"Tanks, other armored vehicles and rocket artillery are actively used": battles in Karabakh and shelling of Martakert

61

In Nagorno-Karabakh, hostilities continued not only with mutual shelling of positions and territories, but also with mutual accusations of violations of the "humanitarian truce". Let us remind that on the basis of the next agreements between the foreign ministers of Azerbaijan and Armenia (this time in the USA), the truce was supposed to start the day before at 8 am local time. But it did not last even an hour ...

The Armenian side today reports on the shelling of Martakert by Azerbaijani troops. It is stated that as a result of the artillery strike, there are civilian casualties.



Armenian journalists say that electricity has gone out in Martakert, problems with water supply have arisen.

Press Secretary of the Armenian Defense Ministry Shushan Stepanyan reported on the use of the Azerbaijani side tanks and other armored vehicles along almost the entire front. The intensification of attacks began in the evening on October 26.

From the summary:

The enemy is actively using tanks, other armored vehicles and rocket artillery.

Meanwhile, the Azerbaijani side continues to publish information and video materials on the territories taken under its control. In particular, a video is presented about the entry into Gubadli (Kubatly), which was controlled by the troops of the unrecognized Nagorno-Karabakh Republic.


Attention is drawn to the actions of the Azerbaijani soldiers with the flag.

As you can see, there is not even talk of any humanitarian truce.
61 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    27 October 2020 06: 34
    No destruction, or not shown! Even me, who is not sympathetic to more than one participant in the conflict, was jarred by the handling of the flag of Armenia! Anna is waiting for your minus!
    1. +2
      27 October 2020 08: 48
      Quote: ASAD
      No destruction, or not shown!

      These cities were abandoned back in 1994, they are not at war. It's my pleasure.
      Now battles are going in 3 directions Lachin, Red Bazaar, Martuni.
  2. -8
    27 October 2020 06: 39
    Turks and terrorists from Syria are fighting with Azerbaijanis. Nobody is for Armenia. Wait and see.
    1. +9
      27 October 2020 06: 45
      Trench truth.
      1. -2
        27 October 2020 14: 01
        To whom is war, and to whom is mother dear?
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +8
      27 October 2020 07: 35
      Quote: Fungus
      Turks and terrorists from Syria are fighting with Azerbaijanis. Nobody is for Armenia. Wait and see.

      Is Armenia already at war?
      NK is fighting - it seems like, but Armenia is not in business, but if in business - so Armenia is fighting for NK.
      1. -7
        27 October 2020 07: 56
        NK is Armenia.
        1. +8
          27 October 2020 08: 09
          Quote: Fungus
          NK is Armenia.

          Seriously ?
          NK is Armenia - but Armenia does not recognize NK.
          Multi-way laughing
          1. -12
            27 October 2020 08: 11
            Well, think about it yourself. Why do they fight and help not then.
            1. +5
              27 October 2020 08: 21
              Quote: Fungus
              and help not then

              belay request
      2. NTD
        0
        27 October 2020 08: 17
        Quote: atalef
        and Armenia type out of business

        Armenians from Armenia and Armenians from other regions and Kurds from the PKK are also fighting for the Armenians.
    4. NTD
      -8
      27 October 2020 08: 15
      Quote: Fungus
      Turks and terrorists from Syria are fighting with Azerbaijanis. Nobody is for Armenia. Wait and see.

      and the Kurds from the Kurdistan Workers' Party? Do you know how many Christians are not Armenians? Even the Armenians from Georgia are fighting, I am silent about the Syrian and Lebanese Armenians. So don't write a lie here.
      1. +3
        27 October 2020 11: 31
        That is, you can, but others cannot?
    5. -2
      27 October 2020 08: 40
      Are there any docks for Turks and terrorists? If not, then you are a balabol!
    6. +2
      27 October 2020 16: 04
      Blatantly lying, the PKK is fighting for Armenia
  3. +4
    27 October 2020 06: 59
    Media: The Pantsir air defense missile system may be the reason for the destruction of Turkish drones in Armenia. The Bayraktar TB2 Turkish drones were attacked by the Russian Pantsir air defense missile systems. This is reported by a number of Russian media.

    The Tula development is called the probable cause of the mass “death” of aircraft over the territory of NKR and Armenia. These complexes, we note, are not officially in service in Armenia. At the same time, "Armor" showed their effectiveness against drones in Syria and Libya.
    1. +4
      27 October 2020 07: 03
      It would be great if this is true, where else to test new weapons, and there is no need to spend money on targets!
      1. NTD
        -7
        27 October 2020 07: 34
        Quote: ASAD
        It would be great if this is true, where else to test new weapons, and there is no need to spend money on targets!

        Do you remember well what you write? Then do not be surprised when the rod is against you. The law and truth are on our side, but you are writing about great news. Clear.
    2. +4
      27 October 2020 07: 38
      Quote: Guards turn
      Media: The Pantsir air defense missile system may be the reason for the destruction of Turkish drones in Armenia. The Bayraktar TB2 Turkish drones were attacked by the Russian Pantsir air defense missile systems. This is reported by a number of Russian media.

      While the destroyed UAVs were not shown, the fallen ones - yes.
      I did not see the wreckage, then, the use of Shells not in service with NK will demonstrate the ambiguous position of Russia in this conflict with subsequent conclusions by Azerbaijan.
      Now the question is, does Russia need it?
      1. -1
        27 October 2020 07: 55
        Yes, Israeli and Turkish drones shoot down every day. Israel and Turkey are for Azeris and nothing. So Russia has the right to supply defensive weapons.
        1. +3
          27 October 2020 08: 07
          Quote: Fungus
          Yes, Israeli and Turkish drones shoot down every day

          good, can you take a photo?
          Quote: Fungus
          Israel and Turkey are for Azeris and nothing.

          and Russia for them.
          Quote: Fungus
          So Russia has the right to supply defensive weapons

          to whom?
          1. -8
            27 October 2020 08: 13
            See different VK groups and channels in the telegram there are a lot of shot down Drones. Russia does not interfere now, unlike you.
            1. +4
              27 October 2020 09: 18
              Only in Libya and Syria.

              Reliably so far 1 (2 - because it looks like the first in a different angle and disassembly, or it just seems to have fallen, so we count 2) - TV2. Plus small UAVs like Orbiters, which are expendable. Plus various Haropes that fall anyway wink ... Even without opposition. As well as this SkyStreaker.


              By the way, Armenia / NKR started using drones from Alishka.

              1. -3
                27 October 2020 09: 47
                In Armenia, they are also shot down quite well. Learn.
                1. +8
                  27 October 2020 09: 54
                  Well, in words, you can shoot down a starship. While they are basically winning in words, tomorrow they will enter Baku and hang Aliyev. Well, something like this.

                  Proofs - 1 (2) TV-2, a pack of small reconnaissance UAVs, and loitering ammunition, which quite possibly fell on their own.
                  1. -4
                    27 October 2020 10: 28
                    Not bad considering the ancient Armenian air defense.
          2. +1
            27 October 2020 09: 14
            How to whom?
            Everyone!
          3. +8
            27 October 2020 10: 36
            Here are the pictures, enjoy) !!!!!




      2. 0
        28 October 2020 11: 51
        Russia will not ask anyone for anything, but the fact that Aliyev complained to Erdogan and the latter had to call Vladimir Putin to ask how he should be is a fact.
    3. 0
      28 October 2020 10: 23
      Keywords - maybe and probably. And so - it may very well be winked
  4. +12
    27 October 2020 07: 04
    Quote: Fungus
    Turks and terrorists from Syria are fighting with Azerbaijanis. Nobody is for Armenia. Wait and see.

    And also a battalion of Pokémon, 3 Tyronasaurus and special troops from Mars, sent personally by Queen Marcianita himself, whose goal is the Armenian genocide sad
  5. +2
    27 October 2020 07: 24
    Russian media have a one-sided approach to the Karabakh problem. Nobody remembers that there are about 50000 refugees from Karabakh. With 7 adjacent districts about 800 thousand. 200 thousand from Armenia.
    And only they write how Azerbaijanis kill the most long-suffering and genocidal Armenians.
    This is a war for the homeland. It is sacred for Azerbaijan. There was no history that Karabakh was Armenian. Even the rulers of the Armenians were never there.
    And Erdogan decided to help. How did all the other countries “helped” for 30 years, represented by Russia. They helped. Here is the result.
    1. +20
      27 October 2020 07: 30
      Quote: Fon Elia
      Russian media approach the problem one-sidedly

      And, presumably, only the Azerbaijani media approach all problems from all sides ... Did they write about the sacred Crimea for Russia? Did you write about the millions of Ukrainian citizens forced to flee to Russia after the 2014 coup? First take the beam out of your eye, please, and then comment on how the Russian media work.

      And about "Erdogan's help", don't be so naive. Erdogan is not Russia. Then he will take off three skins from you and will strip you off for his "help" ...
      1. +5
        27 October 2020 07: 41
        Alexey, I am surprised at myself, but for the second time in three days I give you a "plus" laughing
      2. -1
        27 October 2020 07: 43
        Quote: Volodin
        about "Erdogan's help", don't be so naive. Erdogan is not Russia. He then off you three skins and peels off for his "help" ...

        Well, Russia is the same, somehow, not from kindness of soul helps, but about what will happen then - so this is later - who knows, Erdonan there seems to be like a year ago, there was a dumb friend and s400 and the nuclear power plant, but now how?
        Road spoon for dinner
        1. +2
          27 October 2020 13: 05
          Inter RAO announced a possible withdrawal from the NPP project in Turkey
          Moscow. October 26. INTERFAX.RU - PJSC Inter RAO may withdraw from the Akkuyu NPP project, in which it participated at the stage of forming a consortium to participate in a tender announced in 2008 by the Turkish authorities for the construction of the country's first nuclear power plant. At that time, Inter RAO, which joined the consortium with Atomstroyexport, was a monopoly in the export and import of electricity and had not yet acquired the role of a consolidator of the Russian generation, which the company inherited after the liquidation of RAO UES of Russia.

          The issue of termination of PJSC Inter RAO's participation in Akkuyu Nuclear JSC has been included in the agenda of the meeting of the board of directors of the Russian energy holding scheduled for October 26, follows from his message.
          1. 0
            28 October 2020 16: 49
            From the article that you mentioned https://www.interfax.ru/business/734300
            The Rosatom companies own 99,2% in the capital of Akkuyu Nuclear JSC, which is implementing the Akkuyu NPP construction project in Turkey. Inter RAO owns the remaining 0,8% in the project company.
            Akkuyu NPP is being built according to the BOO scheme, when the owner of the foreign nuclear power plant is the Russian side.

            And what follows from this news?
      3. The comment was deleted.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. -1
      28 October 2020 02: 35
      Quote: Fon Elia
      And Erdogan decided to help.

      It is for this help that you will receive your "fiii" from Russia. Think about the future.
  6. +4
    27 October 2020 07: 26
    What is the next country - "enthusiast" laughing Reskno to host truce negotiations lol ??? Bolder gentlemen, this is not for you to wow to Russia! Or all "there are no bad" everyone understood that this idea is no use to expect? ??
    1. 0
      28 October 2020 00: 44
      What is the next country - "enthusiast"
      I think that Syria can try)) Only there it makes no sense to speak, but just to arrange an excursion, so to speak, a cruise around the country with a photo as it was the current reality, to show Aliyev the oil fields that the Americans "guard", to show Pashinyan what has become of the border with Turkey, to lead the shrines, or rather what is left of them, and to both the children of the hungry and cured, and then look and there will be words for negotiations ...
  7. -1
    27 October 2020 07: 46
    I believe that Armenia will win. It's not just my "Wishlist". Here, nevertheless, the situation inspires hope:
    1. The Armenians are kind of slowly beginning to cope with drones. If they eliminate this threat, the Turks and Azeris will not take the Lachin corridor. And the bridgehead at Hadrut will not be expanded. This means that the Azeris were drawn into the operative intestine, like the Izvarinsky / Debaltsevsky cauldron.
    2. If the Azerbadzans / Turks cannot move further from the north, then all they have is this very gut in the south.
    3. The Armenian troops are now holding their defenses in the mountains, there are enough natural shelters, and the Azeris are essentially on the plain, so the artillery firefights should end in favor of the Armenians.
    4. Well, there is still hope for a well-thought-out attack from the Armenians and the capture of the Azeri / Turks in the cauldron.

    Russia really does not need to get into Karabakh with troops. It is now necessary to break Perdogana in Idlib with the hands of the Syrians. And start a war with Turkey. And pull up the Kurds. And talk the Greeks about at least a provocation in the area of ​​Constantinople.
    And then Turkey finally khan. All according to the prophecy of Paisius the Holy Mountain!
    1. NTD
      0
      27 October 2020 08: 12
      Quote: Magadan
      I believe that Armenia will win.

      That's what I was talking about. Believe further.

      Quote: Magadan
      The Armenians are kind of slowly starting to deal with drones. If they eliminate this threat, the Turks and Azeris will not take the Lachin corridor.

      Turks with Azeris :) hmm. They are losing. Video coming soon. Even if the war is stopped now, Armenians need many billions and lives to recover.

      Quote: Magadan
      Armenian troops now hold their defenses in the mountains

      The Azerbaijani army in 2016 and now has shown more than once how they can destroy Armenians in the mountains.
    2. +2
      27 October 2020 08: 12
      Quote: Magadan
      It is now necessary to break Perdogana in Idlib with the hands of the Syrians. And start a war with Turkey. And pull up the Kurds. And talk the Greeks

      all that matters.
      We need to entrust Lavrov, he will succeed
      1. +4
        27 October 2020 08: 41
        Usually he can only show concern. So xs-xs ...
    3. -1
      27 October 2020 13: 28
      I agree with you that there is nothing for Russia to get directly into Nagorno-Karabakh. But, on the other hand, the Armenians, not the Azerbaijanis, are with us in all our alliances. Yes, their current prime minister has significantly spoiled our relations, but the Pashinyans come and go, and the friendly Armenian people have been and will remain our neighbor and ally. It seems that it is necessary to provide the Armenian Armed Forces with all-round necessary support. as well as the necessary weapons and ammunition. Turkish influence in the Caucasus cannot be allowed to increase, otherwise it will be too late.
    4. 0
      28 October 2020 02: 39
      Quote: Magadan
      Syrians break into Perdogana in Idlib. And start a war with Turkey. And pull up the Kurds. And talk the Greeks about at least a provocation in the region of Constantinople.
      And then Turkey finally khan. All according to the prophecy of Paisius the Holy Mountain!

      Forgotten about the Kurds
  8. +7
    27 October 2020 07: 50
    Quote: MTN
    In Armenia, they insult Russia, they insult Russia at the forums, they don't want to be in one block, but the local users, despite spitting in their direction, are still for them. It's tough! I have not seen this anywhere else. And then everyone is surprised at Azerbaijan's vector towards Turkey. I have always said that the Turks have no friends except the Turks. Every time I naively start to think that there is no, to wake up but in fact not. Nothing to say, worthy allies. But at the same time, when Azerbaijan begins to make plans with Turkey, everyone has such faces and words, as if Russia was betrayed for a silver piece. Although they do not understand that they are doing everything to make Azerbaijan go aside. F16 as Aliyev stated, if 3 forces intervene. Thanks to Turkey for such a gesture. In this conflict we understood who is who.

    Azerbaijan, these are not Turks and their religion is different (Sunnis, Shiites). This union is not for centuries. Let me remind you that Azerbaijan and Iran were one country and in this common country of Persia, representatives of the Azerbaijani dynasty (the last) ruled. Therefore, the union of Turkey and Azerbaijan is not all for centuries.
    1. NTD
      +1
      27 October 2020 08: 13
      Quote: ALSur
      Therefore, the union of Turkey and Azerbaijan is not all for centuries.

      You are deeply mistaken, although there is some truth in your message. Azerbaijanis are Shiite Turks. But we also have Sunnis. In general, Shiism and Sunnism are the choice of the person himself.
      1. 0
        27 October 2020 12: 42
        Quote: MTN
        Quote: ALSur
        Therefore, the union of Turkey and Azerbaijan is not all for centuries.

        You are deeply mistaken, although there is some truth in your message. Azerbaijanis are Shiite Turks. But we also have Sunnis. In general, Shiism and Sunnism are the choice of the person himself.

        Good day! hi
        Are there many observers in Azerbaijan? Visiting the mosque, etc.?
    2. -3
      27 October 2020 08: 24
      Zhirinovsky recently told everything. Azerbaijan is closer to Iran, but the Turks went through and Turkified Azerbaijan)
      1. +4
        27 October 2020 09: 01
        Is Zhirinovsky generally aware of his origin?
      2. +5
        27 October 2020 09: 13
        Quote: huntsman650
        Zhirinovsky recently told everything. Azerbaijan is closer to Iran, but the Turks went through and Turkified Azerbaijan)

        Zhirinovsky is now the ultimate truth.
    3. 0
      27 October 2020 08: 59
      Generally speaking, the Turks do not get hung up on religion. Among them are Christians, Muslims, Buddhists, Tengrians, Zardushti fire-worshipers (Zoroastrians), and atheists in general. The root is the same for all. To discuss such moments it would be worthwhile to create an information base for yourself at least a little. Half (if not more) of Russia consists of Turkic roots. Shiism and Sunnism appeared 1400 years ago, and the Turks were much earlier. Because of such ignoramuses as you, many Russians think that Russians were actually converted to Christianity by the Armenian Monophysites, who themselves became Christians 800 years ago. And all the temples they claim are Albanian and Georgian!
    4. +1
      27 October 2020 09: 10
      ALSur (Alexey) Today, 07:50

      Azerbaijan, these are not Turks and their religion is different (Sunnis, Shiites). This union is not for centuries. Let me remind you that Azerbaijan and Iran were one country and in this common country of Persia, representatives of the Azerbaijani dynasty (the last) ruled.

      Just the last dynasty (Pahlavi) were not Azerbaijanis, but proudly declared that they were Persians. As for the Shiites and Sunnis (friendship or enmity between them), I can say that everything is normal in Azerbaijan. A Shiite can calmly recite namaz in Sunni temples and vice versa. And much more...
      And we have no problems with Sunni states.
      It all depends on government policy.
      1. 0
        27 October 2020 12: 47
        Quote: Bilal

        Just the last dynasty (Pahlavi) were not Azerbaijanis, but proudly declared that they were Persians. As for the Shiites and Sunnis (friendship or enmity between them), I can say that everything is normal in Azerbaijan. A Shiite can calmly recite namaz in Sunni temples and vice versa.

        Even a Jew can pray in any mosque laughing They are not prohibited, Muslims, in 99% of cases, do not make problems for him with this. About Shiites and Sunnis in countries where there is no enmity between them, and so it is understandable
  9. +2
    27 October 2020 08: 42
    Quote: Guards turn
    the reason for the mass “death” of aircraft over the territory of NKR and Armenia.

    Show a photo or video. If not, then the verbal diarrhea of ​​Armagitprop means.
    1. -3
      27 October 2020 22: 27
      Cool)))) when the Ministry of Defense of Azerbaijan uploads videos of a very dubious quality - this is the truth))) when Armenians upload photos, high-quality, close-up - is this nonsense?))))
  10. -2
    27 October 2020 08: 53
    Quote: Fon Elia

    This is a war for the homeland. It is sacred for Azerbaijan. There was no history that Karabakh was Armenian. Even the rulers of the Armenians were never there.
    - You're lying.
    The ninth century, the Khachem principality is Armenian, later it became part of the Armenian kingdom.
    The XNUMXth century Arabic author Istakhri reports on the ethnic composition of the Nagorno-Karabakh region:
    "... for Berd'a and Shamkur people from the tribe of Armenians ..."
    In general, the Armenians lived on the territory of Karabakh even in ancient times, even when the Azerbaijani ethnic group did not even exist - what did you say there about "even the rulers of the Armenians were not there"? Go, learn history, Losers!
    1. +2
      27 October 2020 09: 51
      Don't tell my sneakers. It is immediately obvious that you are Armenian. This song is sung during breaks in Armenian schools. Not Berda, but Barda was the capital of ancient Albania back in the 5th century BC. Armenians have nothing to do with the Albanians at all!
      1. -2
        30 October 2020 22: 01
        "Armenian"??? laughing
        I am a Russian from Ukraine, and the truth is more important to me, and this truth is that the Armenians lived on the territory of Karabakh even when even Azerbaijanis did not even appear, even before the birth of Jesus Christ!
  11. The comment was deleted.
  12. 0
    27 October 2020 22: 24
    Photos of the BTR - 70 have already appeared on the network, as part of the Azerbaijan Army, in Karabakh. It must be understood that modern armored vehicles are either over, or transferred to another place. And for the mountains "70" is very sad. As a rule, the synchronizer does not work, you have to ride on one engine. 90 h.p. "up the hill" - will "boil" like dear mother.