Terms of acceptance into the Navy of the second "Varshavyanka" for the Pacific Fleet

29
Terms of acceptance into the Navy of the second "Varshavyanka" for the Pacific Fleet

The second diesel-electric submarine of Project 636.3 Volkhov, built for the Pacific fleet at the "Admiralty Shipyards", will become part of the Navy on 24 October. This was announced by the official representative of the Russian Navy, Captain 1st Rank Igor Dygalo.

The submarine "Volkhov" (...) by order of the Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Navy, Admiral Nikolai Evmenov, will be accepted into the Russian Navy on October 24

- said in a statement.



It is specified that the solemn ceremony of raising the Andreevsky flag on the submarine will take place at the Admiralty Shipyards, which built the submarine.

The Volkhov diesel-electric submarine is the second Varshavyanka-class submarine in a series being built for the Pacific Fleet. Laid down on the same day as the lead diesel-electric submarine "Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky" - July 28, 2017, launched on December 26, 2019. The lead submarine "Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky" has already entered the Pacific Fleet. The third and fourth submarines, named Ufa and Magadan, were laid down at the Admiralty Shipyards on November 1 last year.

The contract for the construction of a series of six “Varshavyanka” for the Pacific Fleet was signed by the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation and the “Admiralty Shipyards” in September 2016. DEPLs belong to the third generation of diesel-electric submarines. As previously reported by the Ministry of Defense, some changes were made to the design of submarines to improve their tactical and technical data.

In early October 2020, it became known that the first Varshavyankas built for the Pacific Fleet will arrive in Kamchatka next year, 2021.
29 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -5
    22 October 2020 14: 04
    It was necessary to start building ten years earlier, but better late than never.
    1. +17
      22 October 2020 14: 17
      These submarines stand very fast anyway. Three years old and ready. We wish now to quickly get to the permanent duty station. And so that surfacing and diving.
      1. +3
        22 October 2020 14: 38
        These submarines stand very fast anyway. Three years old and ready. We wish now to quickly get to the permanent duty station.

        More "Black holes" are needed, especially at the Pacific Fleet.
      2. -3
        22 October 2020 14: 59
        Quote: Borik
        Three years old and ready. We wish now to quickly get to the permanent duty station.

        I, of course, do not serve in the General Staff, "strategic" thinking is the maximum at the platoon level. Moreover, I have nothing to do with the fleet from the word "in any way". So explain to me who understands.

        In the event of a global conflict, the "strategists" risk simply not making it. Huge missiles, flying 10000 km, fly for a long time, along a predictable trajectory and can also be intercepted.
        Who will interfere with the "decision-making centers" with the soil and form the "Stalin Strait"? Those who quietly, imperceptibly come close and from a small distance, they burn strongly.

        So what's the reasonthat we have good things, capable of this, are produced per hour by a teaspoon? What is missing? Money, specialists, shipyards? As practice shows, in case of emergency, everything is found very quickly. Before the President has time to ask, it was already "yesterday" done. “There is money, there is a lot of money,” Chubais told us. The fact that shipyards are so loaded with orders for yachts of oligarchs that there is no time to build "Varshavyanka" - I do not believe. Workers, again, wages ...

        So where is it now? As long as there is time, until it catches fire? June 22 (no matter what year) it will be too late to think ...
        1. -1
          22 October 2020 15: 14
          Quote: Zoldat_A
          Quote: Borik
          Three years old and ready. We wish now to quickly get to the permanent duty station.

          I, of course, do not serve in the General Staff, "strategic" thinking is the maximum at the platoon level. Moreover, I have nothing to do with the fleet from the word "in any way". So explain to me who understands.

          In the event of a global conflict, the "strategists" risk simply not making it. Huge missiles, flying 10000 km, fly for a long time, along a predictable trajectory and can also be intercepted.
          Who will interfere with the "decision-making centers" with the soil and form the "Stalin Strait"? Those who quietly, imperceptibly come close and from a small distance, they burn strongly.

          So what's the reasonthat we have good things, capable of this, are produced per hour by a teaspoon? What is missing? Money, specialists, shipyards? As practice shows, in case of emergency, everything is found very quickly. Before the President has time to ask, it was already "yesterday" done. “There is money, there is a lot of money,” Chubais told us. The fact that shipyards are so loaded with orders for yachts of oligarchs that there is no time to build "Varshavyanka" - I do not believe. Workers, again, wages ...

          So where is it now? As long as there is time, until it catches fire? June 22 (no matter what year) it will be too late to think ...

          There is no political will or decision-making. Cold War 2.0, announced after the Munich speech, has long been in full swing, as even the liberal-pro-Western Sytin claims on Channel One. The further into the forest, the thicker the partisans. The confrontation will only grow. And yes, US sanctions are forever, until Victory. Our decision to win is not yet visible. Maybe this is another Sly Plan?
        2. +2
          22 October 2020 15: 43
          Quote: Zoldat_A
          Who will interfere with the "decision-making centers" with the soil and form the "Stalin Strait"? Those who quietly, imperceptibly come close and from a small distance, they burn strongly.

          Well, this is definitely not about Varshavyanka.
          These are small boats completely tied to the shore. A maximum of the Japanese can be mixed with the soil and the American base, but certainly not the center of decision-making.
          1. 0
            22 October 2020 16: 00
            Quote: Jacket in stock
            Well, this is definitely not about Varshavyanka.
            These are small boats completely tied to the shore. A maximum of the Japanese can be mixed with the soil and the American base, but certainly not the center of decision-making.

            Yes, I'm not talking about "Varshavyanka" specifically ... I in general - what prevents you from building what you need for high-quality mixing with the soil anyone from under the water? Or will we have to take heights by platoon and port again?
            1. +5
              22 October 2020 16: 11
              Quote: Zoldat_A
              but I'm not talking about "Varshavyanka" specifically ... I in general - what prevents you from building what you need

              Nuclear boats are being built, sort of. Yars and Vanguards too. Vaughn, Americans write that even the "Petrel" is being tested.
              Or are you not talking about that too? Then what about?
              1. 0
                22 October 2020 17: 01
                Quote: Jacket in stock
                Or are you not talking about that too? Then what about?

                About the fact that they need to be stamped, in my opinion, like nails. And here they devil knows how many are being built, then the same amount are being modernized. And you want a lot at once.
        3. 0
          22 October 2020 17: 39
          Money, specialists, shipyards!
        4. +4
          22 October 2020 21: 35
          Unfortunately, the shipyards are not loaded with orders for the oligarchs' yachts. And that's bad. The fact that yachts are being built abroad at the same German shipyards is wrong. Our hard workers, not German, should make money on their construction. My opinion is. If you make money in Russia, then spend right there. am
          Varshavyanka women have nothing to do with the Stalin Strait - they have their own purpose. In general, Lada and not Varshavyanka were supposed to be built, but the project had been brought to mind for more than 10 years, so we ordered something for the Black Sea Fleet and Pacific Fleet that we can build quickly. 6 Warsaw women have already been built for the Black Sea Fleet. This is the second for the Pacific Fleet. Another 4 for the Pacific Fleet and one for the Baltic Fleet have been ordered. In theory, both the Pacific Fleet and the Black Sea Fleet would not interfere with 6 more pieces, but it is necessary to bring the Lada construction to normal rates. The head office is now being modernized after 10 years of trial operation. The first serial is being tested. The second serial is under construction. Another 3 pieces have been ordered. They will lick the project, cure all the ailments and in a couple of three squares and frets will begin to build as quickly as Varshavyanka.
          In general, we are developing a production of ships and vessels of new projects. At the same time, 100 ships are being built in the region. ships and submarines. And there are much more priority things now than DEPL. This is superimposed on the need for maximum import substitution, which further increases the cost and slows down the construction.
      3. 0
        22 October 2020 15: 45
        Quote: Borik
        These submarines stand very fast anyway.

        I know, but the construction should have started earlier.
      4. +1
        22 October 2020 17: 00
        Quote: Borik
        These submarines stand very fast anyway. Three years old and ready. We wish now to quickly get to the permanent duty station. And so that surfacing and diving.

        good
    2. -7
      22 October 2020 14: 23
      Quote: Dart2027
      It was necessary to start building ten years earlier,

      What for? Where is it burning?
      Or a war? Thank God no.
      But the fleet will have fresh ships. (Somehow you can't really call them new)
      1. Aag
        +5
        22 October 2020 15: 55
        "Why? Where is it burning?
        Or a war? "
        You need to smoke right under the booty ?!
        I, frankly, no longer have time to keep track of all the news: Belarus, Donbass, Karabakh, Transnistria ... And this is on top of the already familiar, but, recently, intensified movements of NATO near our borders in ALL regions.
        1. -4
          22 October 2020 16: 16
          Quote: AAG
          Belarus, Donbass, Karabakh, Transnistria

          So what?
          We didn't have enough submarines in the "Belarusian Sea"?
          No, they somehow managed without them.
          Unless it will be easier with them near our nuclear-powered bases, but nobody seems to be drowning them either.
          1. Aag
            +1
            22 October 2020 16: 39
            ... "We didn't have enough submarines in the" Belarusian Sea "?
            No, we somehow managed without them. "" .. Are you sure you did? For now, maybe. But in light of other events, there is no particular confidence. For example, in the next branch they write: "
            Isim soyad
            Today, 14: 13

            -1
            We were all betrayed. First of all, Russia. Moreover, this was done with a mean smile on the face of its President Putin, who was called the most contemptuous nicknames in the KGB for a reason. This dictator and war criminal, notorious from head to toe, should have long ago been responsible for everything he has done and ended his life like Saddam Hussein or Muammar Gaddafi.

            This has not happened yet, but we all, the entire Armenian people, pray for it. We believe that the triumph of historical justice will take place, and Putin will answer for the betrayal of the Armenian people in full. "...
            All "suddenly" offended became ... am
            1. 0
              22 October 2020 16: 51
              Quote: AAG
              ... Are you sure you got by? For now, maybe.

              So I am writing about that that we did without these Varshavyanka for the previous 10 years. No one landed on our shore, did not torpedo the bases of the fleet, did not sink the nuclear-powered ships ...
              But now we will have in the fleet not old boats with a resource depleted in ten years (this is me in response to the fact that they had to be built ten years ago), but completely new ones (albeit outdated).
              And the fact that people in Armenia, Belarus, Ukraine, and in Russia, too, are brainwashed, submarines will not help here.
              Here it is necessary to approach the issue wisely.
              Control the Internet, control the media, offer something intelligible to people ...
              But there is nothing to offer.
              1. Aag
                +1
                22 October 2020 17: 03
                And you say "does not burn ..."
                This angered me ... hi
                1. +3
                  22 October 2020 22: 00
                  Quote: AAG
                  We have done without these Varshavyankas for the previous 10 years.
                  The issue of building submarines pr 636.3 (6 units for the Black Sea Fleet and 6 units for the Pacific Fleet) was accepted by the General Staff of the RF Armed Forces, as carriers of the sea-based CRBD. In addition to the 3M54.1 anti-ship missiles, the units can carry and fire the 3M14 KRBD, which they demonstrated from the waters of the Mediterranean at ISIS targets in the SAR. The last use was on November 03, 2017, during the operation of the Russian Armed Forces in Syria, the B-271 Kolpino submarine fired 6 missile defense missiles of the Caliber-PL complex at the targets of ISIS fighters in the Deir ez-Zor province in the Al-Bukemal area.
                  Among other things, 636.3 can conduct a database against NK and enemy submarines using TO and PLUR (91R1). Therefore, they were apparently chosen for BMZ, tk. 677D is not really there yet, and 777A is just being developed. There will be new projects, there will be something to talk about with the General Staff of the RF Armed Forces. In the meantime, we have what we have.
                  But.
                  1. Aag
                    +1
                    23 October 2020 04: 13
                    You cited other people's words, like mine. I did not write that.
                    1. +1
                      23 October 2020 14: 45
                      Colleague, I apologize, but I chose the computer this way, although, you are right, it was said by my colleague "Pinzhak" ...
                      The poor fellow hangs on the sly. Once again - "mille pardons!"
                      1. Aag
                        +1
                        25 October 2020 12: 51
                        Quote: BoA KAA
                        Colleague, I apologize, but I chose the computer this way, although, you are right, it was said by my colleague "Pinzhak" ...
                        The poor fellow hangs on the sly. Once again - "mille pardons!"

                        Sometimes ... hi
  2. +17
    22 October 2020 14: 13
    Were already tired drinks
  3. -6
    22 October 2020 14: 20
    The first boat has been in the fleet for a long time, but will go to the base almost in a year.
    I wonder if there is a problem with the boat or the fleet doesn't really need it?
    1. +3
      22 October 2020 14: 46
      We need it very much in the Far East, but it's too costly to drive it there on its own. And now these two submarines will be loaded onto a special transport vessel and will be transported in such a way, saving the resource of mechanisms to the Pacific Ocean. In this way, the submarines built for them were transported to Vietnam.
  4. +18
    22 October 2020 14: 24
    Admiralty Shipyards work well that way. Feels like the hand has already been filled. Well done good
  5. +2
    22 October 2020 14: 47
    He started his career there in 1983.
    Hopefully "some changes" are not about that one.
    And then some of the devices there looked archaic even for 1983.
  6. -1
    22 October 2020 21: 55
    Diesel-electric submarines belong to the third generation of diesel-electric submarines.
    but still no one can find them)))