Military Review

US Navy URO destroyer and British Navy reconnaissance ship entered the Black Sea

33
US Navy URO destroyer and British Navy reconnaissance ship entered the Black Sea

NATO has recently become a frequent visitor to the Black Sea, at the moment there are three ships of the alliance in its water area. According to information portals, as well as the press service of the Black Sea fleet, the French reconnaissance ship was joined by an American destroyer and a British reconnaissance ship.


On Tuesday evening, the American missile destroyer USS Roosevelt (DDG-80) entered the Black Sea. According to the command of the 6th operational fleet, the destroyer was sent to the Black Sea for "regular naval operations."

The 6th Fleet regularly operates in the Black Sea to support its allies and partners in the region

- said in a statement from the fleet.

Following the American destroyer into the Black Sea on Wednesday morning, i.e. today, the British Royal Navy's reconnaissance ship HMS Enterprise, officially considered a multipurpose hydrographic survey vessel, entered. It is equipped with multibeam echo sounders and multiple towed transducers for data collection.

Currently in the Black Sea is a large French naval reconnaissance ship Dupuy de Lome, conducting electronic reconnaissance in the interests of the French Military Intelligence Directorate (DRM).

The press service of the Black Sea Fleet emphasized that all NATO ships that entered the Black Sea were taken under continuous monitoring of the forces and means of the fleet. It is clarified that the American destroyer was taken under the control of the Russian frigate "Admiral Essen".

Note that the entry of the American destroyer into the Black Sea caused a violent reaction from the Ukrainian media.
Photos used:
https://twitter.com/USNavyEurope
33 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Mavrikiy
    Mavrikiy 16 September 2020 09: 28
    0
    Maybe it's time for us in the Thames to conduct maneuvers? repeat
  2. Grandfather
    Grandfather 16 September 2020 09: 31
    +3
    Quote: Mavrikiy
    Maybe it's time for us in the Thames to conduct maneuvers? repeat

    "Khibiny" right now ... but in fact, survived ... "PARTNERS" are crazy.
    1. Cyril G ...
      Cyril G ... 16 September 2020 09: 47
      +5
      Quote: Dead Day
      Quote: Mavrikiy
      Maybe it's time for us in the Thames to conduct maneuvers? repeat

      "Khibiny" right now ... but in fact, survived ... "PARTNERS" are crazy.

      What the hell is - they constantly climbed there even during Soviet times. One ram in Yorktown was worth ...
      1. Sayan
        Sayan 17 September 2020 06: 05
        0
        Not a battering ram, but a bulk)))) yes, then our Moremans let the Yankees go))))
  3. Ervin
    Ervin 16 September 2020 09: 37
    -9
    Oh, and NATO will play out with its saber rattling of weapons, that "Omsk" will again surface somewhere in the English Channel!
    1. Normal
      Normal 16 September 2020 09: 54
      -4
      Kindergarten - panties with straps.
  4. GTYCBJYTH2021
    GTYCBJYTH2021 16 September 2020 09: 38
    +1
    It is necessary to turn on electronic warfare devices, various interference and other harmful radio affairs ... It is too late to conduct training firing, you should understand ...
    1. aszzz888
      aszzz888 16 September 2020 11: 31
      0

      GTYCBJYTH2021 (Andrey)
      Today, 09: 38
      0
      It is necessary to turn on electronic warfare devices, various interference and other harmful radio affairs ... It is too late to conduct training firing, you should understand ...
      Mine them, during the Second World War, slip, but not one! wink
  5. Prisoner
    Prisoner 16 September 2020 09: 39
    +2
    Intelligence often. Not good.
  6. Potomac
    Potomac 16 September 2020 09: 42
    +2
    The stormy reaction of the Ukrainian media ?! What kind of publications are reacting so violently? If not only on an adequate military portal, then even on the jaundiced censor, there is not a word about this.
  7. Connor MacLeod
    Connor MacLeod 16 September 2020 09: 44
    +2
    KUG - in the Black Sea, KUG - in the Baltic Sea and KUG - in the Arctic ... what
  8. Ded_Mazay
    Ded_Mazay 16 September 2020 09: 45
    -3
    A couple more candidates for the role of "Black Sea reefs"?
  9. Vladimir Vladimirovich Vorontsov
    Vladimir Vladimirovich Vorontsov 16 September 2020 09: 45
    +1
    ***
    "And the Dnieper will flow into the Pontus sea with three zherela, the sea hedgehog will say Ruskoe ..." ...
    ---
    Increase the time.
    ***
  10. Normal
    Normal 16 September 2020 09: 53
    -1
    What's the use of being under surveillance? Well taken and? They do their job.
  11. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 16 September 2020 10: 05
    -1
    to support its allies and partners in the region
    Without support, the "ally" is certainly not the same - lethargic, shy. But the fact that the NATO bloc (read the USA) has become insolent at our borders to such an extent that it did not allow during the Cold War it is a fact.
  12. APASUS
    APASUS 16 September 2020 10: 11
    -4
    It's time to teach and practice the skills of anti-ship missile crews
    1. Bez 310
      Bez 310 16 September 2020 10: 19
      +1
      Quote: APASUS
      practice the skills of anti-ship missile crews

      "Anti-ship missile crews" - who is this?
      1. APASUS
        APASUS 16 September 2020 10: 44
        0
        Quote: Bez 310
        Quote: APASUS
        practice the skills of anti-ship missile crews

        "Anti-ship missile crews" - who is this?

        PBRK Bastion and its anti-ship missiles "Onyx"
        1. Bez 310
          Bez 310 16 September 2020 11: 15
          +2
          Quote: APASUS
          PBRK Bastion

          Now it has become much clearer
          we are talking about a DBK type "Bastion", and its
          combat crew.
    2. tlauicol
      tlauicol 16 September 2020 10: 21
      +4
      Quote: APASUS
      It's time to teach and practice the skills of anti-ship missile crews

      Anti-ship missile crews? It's time, it's time
  13. zwlad
    zwlad 16 September 2020 10: 18
    -1
    Good training for our aircraft, videoconferencing and navy
  14. north 2
    north 2 16 September 2020 10: 25
    0
    Crimea was, is and will be part of the Russian state, therefore in the Black Sea the Russian fleet
    I didn’t have to relax before, I don’t have to now, I won’t have to in the future either. Remember how two ships of the USSR Chechen Black Sea Fleet even had to use a bulk against a sluggish American. For the fleet
    not news. But if the United States creates its own VM base in Odessa, it will be bad news. But if
    DPR and LPR then did not stop by something strange order in front of Mariupol, so after LPR and
    Odessa would have followed the DPR and now there would be no need to fear that the United States in Odessa would create
    NATO naval base. And they would still receive sanctions, even though the DPR and LPR, as now, are not part of Russia, but Russia loaded the sanctions, even though the LPR, DPR and Odessa with the region would be part of Russia, the sanctions would be exactly loaded on Russia.
  15. Livonetc
    Livonetc 16 September 2020 10: 50
    -3
    Give more goals!
    But in principle.
    What damage can such a "group" cause in the Black Sea before its destruction?
    1. Wolf
      Wolf 16 September 2020 11: 31
      +1
      This grouping serves to prepare damage not for damage. Detailed mapping of defense and defense capability.
      1. Livonetc
        Livonetc 16 September 2020 11: 44
        +3
        Detailed "mapping" of this region has already been performed many times in the smallest detail.
        Do you mean the identification of coastal defense assets?
        Do you think it makes sense to work out plans for an invasion of Russian territory in this region?
        Crimea, in this thread, dotted the i's.
        There is absolutely no chance.
        Is that to demonstrate their presence to such countries as Ukraine and Bulgaria, no more.
        1. Wolf
          Wolf 16 September 2020 12: 38
          0
          One of them all can be expected, even a sudden massing of the CD strike from all directions east, south, north and west, the amount of technology gives them the opportunity to think about it. Hitler's lesson must be well remembered. He attacked the USSR completely not logically !!! The ego had no thread for one reason to do this. I do not believe that they will attack the Krim, but I believe that they can fully try to massaging the blow in Russia as a whole. Their Krim is not a target, but the resources of Siberia and the north. For this happened Ukraine, and now Belarus, they have a long-term plan and are implementing it. Of course, they can try with a proxy war against Russia from the south and in the Caucasus, but it is less likely that nothing will be achieved except that the Ruska army add operational force and rapid armament of modern equipment.
          1. Livonetc
            Livonetc 16 September 2020 12: 54
            0
            From them can and can be expected.
            However, they definitely expect from Russia.
            They are not feeble-minded.
            In the event of an attack on Russia from a group that entered the Black Sea.
            Expect the following:
            1 The earliest destruction of a group of warships located in the Black Sea.
            2. Possible retaliatory strike using nuclear and conventional tactical weapons against NATO infrastructure and facilities.
            3. Possible escalation of the conflict into a full-scale nuclear war.
            It is these expectations of the Anglo-Saxons that protect the world from a global catastrophe.
            Well, Russia certainly has no right to relax.
            1. Wolf
              Wolf 16 September 2020 13: 02
              -1
              Livontek if they attack it will not only be from the Black Sea and all directions at the same time. The idea of ​​a massive strike on the bases of instant destruction of 80-90% of the nuclear potential of Russia, and then who will they shoot at? The remainder of 10-20% will be able to intercept from missile defense.
              1. Wolf
                Wolf 16 September 2020 13: 07
                0
                So if they launch a missile launcher from Japan, South Caucasus, Alaska, Poland, Rumunia, and from all the seas, how many times do you need missiles to reach the target? How much time is left for reaction? This is a question of minutes.
                1. Wolf
                  Wolf 16 September 2020 13: 09
                  0
                  As for dementia, Stalin did not expect that Hitler was weak-minded, but ..... wink
              2. Livonetc
                Livonetc 16 September 2020 13: 11
                +1
                I understand that.
                My question concerned precisely the location of NATO warships directly in the Black Sea region.
                In my opinion, the presence of warships in the Black Sea basin during the planned massive NATO strike against Russia is absolutely inappropriate.
                These ships will be destroyed too quickly.
                The military infrastructure of the Russian Federation in this region will make it possible to accomplish this task quickly and guaranteed.
                And about the massive attack by conventional weapons by NATO.
                According to the military doctrine of Russia.
                In the event of a real threat to the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Russian Federation, all means will be used, up to strategic nuclear weapons.
                This is the main deterrent.
                Russia will not be drawn into a conventional arms race, as the USSR did.
                Now the Russian Federation cannot afford it.
                The potential for the destruction of forces and assets of NATO countries and their allies by strategic nuclear weapons will simply be maintained and improved.
  16. 1536
    1536 16 September 2020 12: 17
    +1
    We do not give them a tough rebuff at the diplomatic level, so they are now preparing military provocations, and in fact an attack on Crimea. Why is our ambassador still not recalled from Berlin for consultations, while the German one hangs out in Moscow, like, excuse me, "macho"? Why do Poles feel at home in Moscow and Belarus, as a result of which they become insolent into cabbage? Why do we need the embassies of the three Baltic "tigers", although it would be quite enough that their interests, if any, were represented by a third party. What are these military maneuvers in Belarus, if we enter, then we leave? We entered, so we will sit all the way. Endless apologies for their words, fussing around some alcohol addicts, their fabrications, taken as the ultimate truth. Etc. etc. Therefore, there is nothing to be surprised if the Anglo-Americans and their mycelium land troops on the Crimean coast and try to seize our ports on the Black and Azov seas. Why bring to trouble, when now it is possible to give adversaries on tinsel not by military, but by diplomatic and economic methods?
  17. iouris
    iouris 16 September 2020 19: 26
    +1
    It would be time to relocate the Bocharov Ruchey residence to the district ... but there is nowhere.