Military Review

How Russia can win the trust of the former Soviet republics

282

Having almost lost the last friendly country in the post-Soviet space, Moscow is now rapidly making up for its own and others' omissions, trying as reliably as possible to bind the almost escaped Minsk to itself. In this case, the issue with the next color revolution, which would have brought Russophobes to power in Belarus, did not work, but the situation was, as they say, on the verge. What's next?


The question, as a matter of fact, refers not only and not so much specifically to Belarus, as to all other states that were formed on the site of the former republics of the USSR. Relations with them are a moment of paramount importance for Russia, and it is for this reason that the West is making every effort to spoil these very relations to the limit, turning our yesterday's brothers into the worst enemies. Will we continue to wait for the last line in order to save the situation by the most desperate measures, up to promises of military assistance, or will we still learn to calculate the game at least a few moves ahead?

Today it is already quite obvious that it is not possible to form any pro-Russian agenda in such states, relying solely on the deeds of bygone days, that is, decades spent together within the Soviet Union. Generations are replaced, in place of people who still remember the times of the USSR and who lived or at least were born during its existence, people who perceive the definition of "Soviet" in a predominantly negative context come to the political and power elite of the independent states of the post-Soviet space.

And local nationalists, which are abundant in almost every such country, are working tirelessly in the field of perversion and denigration of the past. So, "museums of the Soviet occupation" and similar institutions grow in them like filthy mushrooms, which in no way contribute to an increase in the love of the local population for Moscow. The problem lies in the fact that it is today's Russia that should offer something attractive, interest and give reasons for sympathy. But does she have anything to offer potential partners and allies? ..

It would seem that the concept set forth in the "Diamond Hand" ("and if something goes wrong, turn off the gas"), which worked for a long time quite properly, has clearly shown its complete failure. After all, energy is produced not only in Russia. And not only it produces modern weapons. But it was deliveries of both the first and the second from time immemorial that Moscow has used as the notorious carrot and stick to regulate relations with its post-Soviet neighbors. The examples of Ukraine and Belarus in this matter have already become textbooks, so this time we will consider another country - Armenia.

Having in its neighbors a belligerent Azerbaijan that has serious territorial claims and is actively supported by Turkey (and not only Turkey), Yerevan is extremely dependent on military-technical cooperation with Russia. Nevertheless, this did not prevent the Armenian parliament from adopting, and the president of this country from approving this year a law on electronic media, according to which all Russian TV channels that previously broadcast programs in the republic are subject to a total ban. At the same time, no one hides that Channel One, Russia and Kultura will disappear from the Armenian air on the grounds that they "posed a threat to national interests."

At the same time, as it became known the day before, the US Ambassador to Yerevan Lynn Tracy signed memorandums with the local government on "assistance in the formation of anti-corruption institutions and a new patrol police in the state." Thus, one more step is being taken to transfer Armenia to external control from Washington according to the scenario of Georgia and Ukraine. And it's not just that the United States is taking on a significant portion of the funding for these reforms. It's just that the Americans managed to convince the whole world that their model of fighting corruption and law enforcement is the most advanced and effective. Although this statement is far from reality, they continue to believe it all the time.

It is in this way, through the creation in the post-Soviet states, first of various NGOs and controlled media, which are taken to extol and promote various aspects of the American way of life, and then through the reorganization of key state institutions and structures in their own image and likeness, the United States creates all new and new "anti-Russia". The same, in principle, applies to the process of planting pro-American, pro-Western political parties and public organizations.

Seizing the enemy's initiative in this matter is not an easy task. I'm not even sure that it is generally feasible for our country at the present stage. The question is not so much even about the huge investments that sensible, professional and systematic propaganda requires. Yes, yes, it is she - no need to frown in disgust at hearing this word, we cannot do without her! The basis for victory in the ideological confrontation with the West can only be real victories and bright achievements of Russia, which the former Soviet republics will want to be equal to.

It will be extremely difficult to achieve greater attractiveness than the West, not only for the elites, but also for the society of post-Soviet countries in general, but it is necessary to strive for this. Everything else, both cultural, economic, and military cooperation, will certainly follow. Another option is powerless to look at the ring of hostile states shrinking around Russia, with whose hands the West will try to destroy it.
Author:
Photos used:
Twitter of the Belarusian opposition
282 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. NEXUS
    NEXUS 6 September 2020 15: 07 New
    17
    How Russia can win the trust of the former Soviet republics

    Develop an honest and adequate policy towards the CIS republics. Finally, for myself to understand that the policy towards these republics is much more important than the policy towards the United States or England. This is our underbelly. And once, historically quite recently, we lived as one people, regardless of nationality.
    1. Svarog
      Svarog 6 September 2020 16: 04 New
      22
      1. The idea uniting the population of the countries is socialism.
      2. Integration of the elite into joint projects.
      3. General purpose.
      4. And the end is honesty and responsibility in relationships.
      It'll be enough. But this issue is not on the agenda at the top, and the capitalist system can "be friends" and unite only against someone ... in this paradigm, everything goes to the point that they unite against Russia.
      1. military_cat
        military_cat 6 September 2020 16: 30 New
        +1
        the ring of hostile states shrinking ever tighter around Russia, with whose hands the West will try to destroy it
        But why? For the sake of resources, how is it most often claimed? But even the text of the article provides a wonderful example of why an attempt to put resources at the head of the world order gives a completely inadequate, non-working picture of reality.
        1. Aleksandr1234
          Aleksandr1234 7 September 2020 08: 34 New
          +1
          What for? For power and money. The USA wants to dominate the world and is doing everything for this.
          1. umah
            umah 11 September 2020 14: 28 New
            +3
            In order to neutralize the Russophobes in the neighbors, first you need to neutralize the Russophobes in Russia. No one will join us if we ourselves in the power structures sound proposals to "surrender" to the hegemon.
        2. Roman070280
          Roman070280 7 September 2020 09: 37 New
          +8
          Maybe everything is much simpler ??
          And we're really not as good as Solovyov tells us ??
          1. DrEng527
            DrEng527 7 September 2020 12: 05 New
            0
            Quote: Roman070280
            And we're really not as good as Solovyov tells us ??

            the good ones are those who are alive ... and with your approach the Russians will have to die or become dung for others ... fool
        3. Simargl
          Simargl 8 September 2020 04: 23 New
          -1
          Quote: military_cat
          a wonderful example is given of why an attempt to put resources at the head of the world order gives a completely inadequate, non-working picture of reality.
          Because resources without sales markets are not an idea. We take resources at a bargain price, sell "beads" for a high price, "cream" for ourselves.
      2. Aleksandr21
        Aleksandr21 6 September 2020 18: 24 New
        +6
        Quote: Svarog
        1. The idea uniting the population of the countries is socialism.
        2. Integration of the elite into joint projects.
        3. General purpose.
        4. And the end is honesty and responsibility in relationships.
        It'll be enough. But this issue is not on the agenda at the top, and the capitalist system can "be friends" and unite only against someone ... in this paradigm, everything goes to the point that they unite against Russia.


        As for socialism, it is a controversial idea, in the sense that Russia is now in a capitalist system and for the CIS countries to be interested in our experience and the general idea of ​​socialism, you need to show by your own example how attractive this system is. For example, "Socialism of the XXI century" to the group of which Venezuela, Cuba, Nicaragua belong and their experience is not interesting to other countries, i.e. the standard of living and the successes of these countries are very low (to put it mildly), but the successes of the capitalist countries, especially Western Europe: Norway, Denmark, Ireland, etc. quite attractive to the population, and young people in particular. But the joint projects of the CIS countries and Russia, this is interesting, we need projects from which all parties will benefit and strengthen economic ties between states, so that the countries of the post-Soviet space are themselves interested in deepening cooperation in all areas. Well, the general goal, here as an option, is the creation of one of the poles of the world, such an analogue of the EU that can significantly raise the standard of living of the population in post-Soviet countries and make these countries richer ... and there is already an attempt to create it, this is the EAEU and its further development within the framework of this concept, but the problem here is that the local elites are not interested in further integration into this structure, since there is a risk of losing personal power and leaps of influence, and how it is not clear here. The EU succeeded, but there is a completely different mentality, culture and benefits from economic advantages outweighed the personal benefits of individuals / forces of influence, and we are still at a dead end. Even with Belarus, the integration stopped, because Old Man does not want to give up power, about other post-Soviet countries and there is nothing to say about the situation with integration even further.
        1. dorz
          dorz 6 September 2020 19: 37 New
          10
          Almost lost the last friendly country in the post-Soviet space Moscow is now rapidly making up for its own and others' omissions ...

          This phrase evokes sarcasm in light of the loss of any control over its western neighbors, and the inappropriate irony of the Russian Foreign Ministry over the Serbian president at a reception in the White House is generally perplexing. The leadership of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs should send ̶n̶a̶ ̶s̶v̶a̶l̶k̶u̶ to resign.
          1. Alexander I
            Alexander I 8 September 2020 09: 06 New
            0
            but in my opinion they were poked correctly by harey, let them feel the difference in approaches
        2. aybolyt678
          aybolyt678 7 September 2020 05: 16 New
          +3
          Quote: Aleksandr21
          A controversial idea about socialism,

          why so? a society of social justice and security is in great demand today. Although we call the countries of the West capitalist, but there are high taxes that are spent on improving the standard of living of all! that is, there are elements of socialism in the West, which, of course, are not advertised. This is their strength today. IMHO of course
        3. Roman070280
          Roman070280 7 September 2020 09: 44 New
          -1
          A controversial idea about socialism, in the sense that Russia is now in the capitalist system and so that the CIS countries are interested in our experience and the general idea of ​​socialism is you need to show by your own example how attractive this system is.


          1. By your own example, you will need to show any of your experience, in any form of government .. so this statement is inappropriate in principle ..

          2. When we already had socialism before, we managed to somehow interest more countries with this example than now .. so this statement is also erroneous ..

          3. Socialism is good .. capitalism is bad .. This is an axiom !! Proceeding from it, if you do well, then the result will be the same .. And you can attract by lies and deceit .. you can only attract deceivers and attract .. who will rob you later ..
          1. DrEng527
            DrEng527 7 September 2020 12: 12 New
            -8
            Quote: Roman070280
            This is an axiom !!

            it is nonsense! socialism is a prison for people, which clever people have long understood ...
            https://olegmakarenko.ru/1938791.html
            1. businessv
              businessv 8 September 2020 18: 06 New
              0
              Quote: DrEng527
              that smart people have long understood ...

              If you are talking about Chicherin, then his reasoning is completely divorced from the management of the state, we examined in detail this very statement of him, to which you referred. So indiscriminately do not write bloopers, referring to essays, or abstracts of one person. No one in the world could repeat the phenomenon of Stalin's industrialization, this is a fact that no one was able to refute, which means that socialism is a progressive system, to which you need to add modern laws and requirements, and of course, competent leadership, more patriotic and independent than the current ...
              1. DrEng527
                DrEng527 9 September 2020 12: 18 New
                0
                Quote: businessv
                his reasoning is completely divorced from the management of the state,

                Seriously? Let me remind you that he is the first state specialist in Russia ... hi
                Quote: businessv
                So indiscriminately do not write bloopers, referring to essays, or abstracts of one person

                be surprised, but only a few think and discover new things bully Let me remind you that the periodic law was invented by Mendeleev, and the kernel was discovered by Rutherford, although Chicherin's hypothesis ...

                Quote: businessv
                No one in the world could repeat the phenomenon of Stalin's industrialization,

                Brad! bully development of the industry of Ingushetia before WW1 went on at a faster pace than in 1 five-year plan! At the same time, the level of consumption did not fall, but in the USSR it fell by half - hence the famine and 7 million deaths ... This is the price of Stalin's industrialization .. request

                Quote: businessv
                which means that socialism is a progressive system

                only for imbeciles who cannot think ... request Chicherin pointed out exactly - socialism is inevitably a terrible dictatorship! However, this can be seen from the KP Manifesto - if you read carefully - there are already labor armies there ... request However, the question of the commanders of these armies did not emphasize wink
                Quote: businessv
                which needs to be added modern laws and requirements, and of course, competent leadership, more patriotic and independent than the current one.

                the main problem with idealists is that they live outside reality ... bully
                1. businessv
                  businessv 9 September 2020 15: 11 New
                  +1
                  Quote: DrEng527
                  Seriously? Let me remind you that he is the first state specialist in Russia.
                  I recommend keeping your ambitions and irony with you when chatting - you are not on the podium and you are not the ultimate truth.
                  Let me remind you that he is the first state specialist in Russia.
                  And you, for an hour do not confuse Boris Nikolayevich with his nephew, Georgy Vasilievich, or with Kirill Lavrentievich? Boris Nikolayevich was not a "specialist in state law", but a lawyer (one of the founders of constitutional law), a philosopher and historian who died in 1904, so his essay could not be tied to a specific state. the device of the Union, and I wrote about this as a matter of course.
                  Quote: DrEng527
                  Rave! development of the industry of Ingushetia before WW1 went on at a faster pace than in 1 five-year plan!

                  You don't even know what time there was industrialization in the Union! Who are you? Victim EG? Until 1917, Russia was 80% a peasant country! Have you heard the slogan "Land for the peasants"? What industrial development are you whispering about ?!
                  Quote: DrEng527
                  be surprised, but only a few think and discover new things
                  only their thoughts are implemented, as a rule, by collectives. Please do not write to me any more your pseudo-liberal and anti-socialist nonsense! hi
                  1. DrEng527
                    DrEng527 9 September 2020 22: 36 New
                    -2
                    Quote: businessv
                    I recommend keeping your ambitions and irony with you when chatting - you are not on the podium and you are not the ultimate truth.

                    keep your complexes to yourself bully
                    Quote: businessv
                    and could not be tied to a specific state. organization of the Union

                    he predicted the essence of this system - without idealism hi
                    Quote: businessv
                    You don't even know what time there was industrialization in the Union! Who are you? Victim EG?

                    I understand that you don’t know the statistics for 1909-13? And what antlers and demagoguery ... bully By the way - against my background, you are a banal ignoramus, but I will remain incognito request

                    Quote: businessv
                    Sevdoliberastic and anti-socialist nonsense!

                    you are a banal bass, and not curious ... good luck bully
                    1. businessv
                      businessv 9 September 2020 22: 54 New
                      +1
                      Quote: DrEng527
                      I understand that you don’t know the statistics for 1909-13? And what antlers and demagoguery ... By the way - against my background you are a banal ignoramus, but I will remain incognito

                      You are funny! The industrialization of the USSR was carried out from 1930 to 1939. Antlers are young deer antlers, like you. The background from you is very murky and provocative, and as regards incognito and scholarship, it is in your interests to keep them further, so as not to disgrace the alma mater, although you probably did not graduate from universities (c) due to the fact that you are an elementary disgrace! Learn, your 8 classes are clearly not enough to oppose this resource! laughing
                      1. DrEng527
                        DrEng527 9 September 2020 23: 06 New
                        0
                        Quote: DrEng527
                        development of the industry of Ingushetia before WW1 went on at a faster pace than in 1 five-year plan!

                        Quote: businessv
                        The industrialization of the USSR was carried out from 1930 to 1939.

                        as I understand it, for you the history of Russia began in 1917 bully By the way, ignorant, why didn't you mention the third five-year plan? Did not hear? bully
                        Quote: businessv
                        although for sure you "did not graduate from universities" (c) due to the fact that you are an elementary disgrace!
                        did not finish bully I am a graduate of Physics and Technology TPI, ignorant! hi
                        Do not announce your university?
                        Quote: businessv
                        Learn, your 8 classes are clearly not enough to oppose on this resource

                        what a complex you have! bully
        4. Simargl
          Simargl 8 September 2020 04: 27 New
          -1
          Quote: Aleksandr21
          Russia is now in the capitalist system
          In Russia, neo-feudalism. And classes are reborn, and social elevators are covered up.

          Quote: Aleksandr21
          For example, "Socialism of the XXI century" to the group of which Venezuela, Cuba, Nicaragua belong and their experience is not interesting to other countries, i.e. living standards and successes of these countries are very low (to put it mildly)
          It is not the fault of the system, but the sanctions. Capitalism in such conditions would long ago have fallen into anarchy.
      3. DrEng527
        DrEng527 7 September 2020 12: 06 New
        +2
        Quote: Svarog
        1. The idea uniting the population of the countries is socialism.

        Where did you get this nonsense? have you ever been to one republic? We are just sewing this socialism that the Germans invented ..
        Quote: Svarog
        And over there is honesty and responsibility in relationships.

        another complacent demagogue ... bully
      4. businessv
        businessv 8 September 2020 09: 02 New
        0
        Quote: Svarog
        in this paradigm, everything goes to the fact that they are united against Russia.
        Exactly! And our "elite" in the first generation, headed by our government, contributes to this pretty much!
    2. snake
      snake 6 September 2020 16: 29 New
      23
      Quote: NEXUS
      Develop an honest and adequate policy towards the CIS republics.

      You have to start with yourself. First of all, develop an honest and adequate policy towards the population of the Russian Federation. But the compradors-shift workers are not up to it. They should grab more and transfer to the West. Russia will continue to lose influence. How she loses population, resources, smart people and respect (Olympics under white flags, yeah.)
    3. Civil
      Civil 6 September 2020 19: 32 New
      +4
      Two indicators of the state's success in the 21st century:
      1. The standard of living.
      2. Life expectancy.
      And no matter what kind of system it all provides.
      1. Hlavaty
        Hlavaty 6 September 2020 20: 31 New
        +9
        Quote: Civil
        1. The standard of living.
        2. Life expectancy.
        And no matter what kind of system it all provides.


        It doesn't matter to you because you've forgotten the third, and most important, indicator:
        3.Content of life

        A high standard of living does not in itself make life meaningful, but simply provides more varied ways of wasting life.
        Moreover, the duration of life simply prolongs this void in time.

        Capitalism benefits from this emptiness - it refines the methods of filling it, inventing the wildest "needs".
        Socialism (communism) aims at the development of man and society.
        That is why the results are so different.
        1. Simargl
          Simargl 8 September 2020 04: 45 New
          0
          Quote: Hlavaty
          It doesn't matter to you because you've forgotten the third, and most important, indicator:
          3.Content of life
          It depends on the work of propaganda.

          Quote: Hlavaty
          A high standard of living does not in itself make life meaningful, but simply provides more varied ways of wasting life.
          A high standard of living implies opportunities. And culture is their realization.

          Quote: Hlavaty
          Capitalism benefits from this emptiness - it refines the methods of filling it, inventing the wildest "needs"
          Not. Capitalism, once again, benefits from expensive needs. Compare: reading old books or doing motorsport. I think it is obvious that it is more profitable for the capitalist that the plebs are engaged in expensive motorsport, and not read books.
          Another thing is that the mind loves silence ... usually ...

          Quote: Hlavaty
          Socialism (communism) aims at the development of man and society.
          If it does not slide towards leveling. And if it does not slip, inequality happens and it grows: first, workers and / or intellectuals receive more benefits, then they group and the group stands out in society. Even if it is possible to completely cut off all blockages, to leave an honest social ladder where a person will have equal opportunities, stratification will still occur. The more "honest" and "equal" the opportunities, the slower. So? Revolution and taking away the accumulated benefits "equally"?
          Do you know where socialism was practically? In ancient Greece ... and in Sparta. In the first - not as "equal" as in Sparta. The latter did not survive. Think why.
          1. Hlavaty
            Hlavaty 9 September 2020 15: 17 New
            0
            Somehow you didn't quite manage to argue.
            Everything in the state depends on propaganda. In any state.
            Quote: Simargl
            A high standard of living implies opportunities. And culture is their realization.

            Opportunities also don't make life meaningful. Society should stimulate a person to develop. But the culture under capitalism is absolutely deplorable. That is why the realization of possibilities is such a curve.
            Quote: Simargl
            "Capitalism benefits from this emptiness - it refines the methods of filling it, inventing the wildest" needs "
            Not. Capitalism, once again, benefits from expensive needs.
            ... it is more profitable for the capitalist that the plebs are engaged in expensive motorsport, and not read books.

            The word "no" looks strange here. So further you confirm my words. I didn't write that invented needs should be cheap. I wrote that they come up with wild "needs", that is, not really needed. But, as you rightly pointed out, they require a lot of money. Profitable for the capitalists.

            Quote: Simargl
            Socialism (communism) aims at the development of man and society.
            If it does not slide towards leveling. And if it doesn't slide, inequality happens

            And who told you that socialism is equality? And what do you even mean by equality? Capitalist propaganda presents equality as a crowd of people dressed in uniforms and living in barracks. In fact, we are talking about equality of opportunity.
            Real equality, not the "equality of opportunity" advertised by the adherents of capitalism.
            With real equality of opportunity, everyone can get an education, choose any profession, and become the head of state. And this is really provided by society. The USSR is a vivid example of this - there was no other country in the world with so many leaders of all levels, scientists, military leaders, etc., who came from the very bottom of society.
            Under capitalism, your options depend on how much money and political connections your family has. And for this "some are more equal than others."
            Quote: Simargl
            Do you know where socialism was practically? In ancient Greece ... and in Sparta.

            You know, before you make such statements, you should study the history better.
            About Greece. The cradle and model of "democracy" Athens, considered the people ("demos"), which owned power in Athens, only those free men who had capital no less than the value of the house. There were even cases when those who did not have enough money were simply expelled from Attica. Is this practical socialism in your opinion?
            Well, the very fact that Athens and Sparta were slave-owning societies makes it senseless to search for socialism in them.
            Practical socialism as such has not yet been found anywhere. There were some attempts to build it, but so far unsuccessful. Including the USSR, although it approached more than others.
            1. Simargl
              Simargl 9 September 2020 20: 10 New
              -1
              Quote: Hlavaty
              Somehow you didn't quite manage to argue.
              Need to try better?
              Quote: Hlavaty
              Everything in the state depends on propaganda. In any state.
              I didn’t argue with that.
              Quote: Hlavaty
              Opportunities also don't make life meaningful.
              For that absence - leads to degradation.
              Quote: Hlavaty
              Society should stimulate a person to develop. But the culture under capitalism is absolutely deplorable.
              Is it deplorable? It still needs to be proved: then I see that there is not so much socialist culture recognized in the world, for which the socialists are actively adopting the capitalist one. Another thing is that the world oligarchy has slipped down the unpretentious path of satisfying base needs.
              Quote: Hlavaty
              That is why the realization of possibilities is such a curve.
              What is the "curve"? Drink less or read less? Which %% of the literature that you read is written in a socialist vein / society?
              Quote: Hlavaty
              I wrote that they come up with wild "needs", that is, not really needed.
              And what is really needed? By and large - eat and sleep. Everything else is invented needs. Including reproduction. Are you suggesting to slide down to the minimum necessary?

              Quote: Hlavaty
              And who told you that socialism is equality?
              .
              In fact, we are talking about equality of opportunity.
              Yes Yes:
              Quote: Simargl
              Even if it is possible to completely cut off all blockages, to leave an honest social ladder where a person will have equal opportunities, stratification will still occur. The more "honest" and "equal" the opportunities, the slower.
              Did you misunderstand what I wrote?
              Quote: Hlavaty
              With real equality of opportunity, everyone can get an education, choose any profession, and become the head of state. And this is really provided by society. The USSR is a vivid example of this - there was no other country in the world with so many leaders of all levels, scientists, military leaders, etc., who came from the very bottom of society.
              The USSR just confirms my words. Yes, there were pretty loose social lifts. Why do you think? Yes, because the places appeared faster than the nomenklatura could multiply !!! People who were very tested and / or built into the system came to power. As everywhere, as now. Read "forbidden" jokes. From the "Chukchi" series, for example. "The Chukchi watched TV, they said that everything in our country is for a person, the Chukchi was in Moscow, the Chukchi saw this person."

              Quote: Hlavaty
              Under capitalism, your options depend on how much money and political connections your family has. And for this "some are more equal than others."
              Is it true? As soon as there is a vacant place, the capitalists calmly let sensible people take it, invest money to make a profit. We don't have capitalism - we have neo-feudalism, that's why it doesn't work that way.

              Quote: Hlavaty
              There were even cases when those who did not have enough money were simply expelled from Attica. Is this practical socialism in your opinion?
              What is this? You seem to have read the letters, but did not deign to understand.
              Let's think I could be wrong.
              What can lead to poverty?
              - Disease.
              - Laziness.
              - Stupidity.
              - Vices.
              An ordinary person, as I understand it, can, without having these items in the ballast, at least not lose his home. The first thing you need to do is work !!!
              Quote: Hlavaty
              Well, the very fact that Athens and Sparta were slave-owning societies makes it senseless to search for socialism in them.
              What's the big deal? Now slaves are being replaced by machines, so what?
              And what do you mean by the concept of "slave"? Otherwise it turns out that athletes are slaves, because they sell them, change them.
    4. iouris
      iouris 6 September 2020 21: 45 New
      -1
      Quote: NEXUS
      Develop an honest and adequate policy towards the CIS republics.

      The CIS does not exist. And the "former Soviet republics" all together - this is Russia. This is an "honest and adequate" policy.
    5. Paul
      Paul 7 September 2020 10: 16 New
      0
      It seems that there is no point in arguing with your statement, but when you think about the fact that an honest and adequate policy should be done by honest and adequate politicians, you immediately lose heart. There are no such people anywhere - neither among us, nor among the peoples who lived "one people". Not only does the United States have an inexhaustible source of funding for "honesty and adequacy" in the near future, but our servants of the people are striving first of all for the "trough." It is only in the literature of the priest that the hero fights for the happiness of the Motherland, but in reality the heroes are dark, but there are no feats.
    6. Nikolay73
      Nikolay73 7 September 2020 13: 37 New
      +1
      Yes, enough ashes for the occasion and without, about one people and the underbelly ... people and nations believe in what they want and we need to already learn that we need to first understand ourselves and ourselves, think, act and live by their own interests rather than helping and saving others.
    7. Andrey Grad
      Andrey Grad 7 September 2020 16: 03 New
      +1
      Trust to win from whom, from peoples who themselves do not decide anything, and even from their not decisive elites? What is the point? If the republics are run directly from the west and are being poured into the ears from there?
      There is no independence here, complete, unconditional submission to the West.
      For example, in the 91st mattresses in Riga were immediately brought 200 labus prepared overseas and put in key places in management, media, economy, then for several more years they were selected, trained (recruited) and put until the entire top was replaced by their straight lines puppets. Now the president is a citizen of Germany, the prime minister is a citizen of mattress, the minister of defense is a small britain.
      The whole top is a puppet.
      What will of the local people interest them? They came to work, work on a rotational basis among the Papuans and with their earnings back to the metropolis.
      You can crawl out of your skin by coaxing them with gingerbread and location, but an order from the owners will come from across the ocean and they will make puppet regimes exactly as they are ordered, neither seductive projects, nor millions of kickbacks will help. Because they know the puppets, there you will not grease yourself with millions in front of the owners, they can treat a newcomer to them.
    8. georgiigennadievitch
      georgiigennadievitch 10 September 2020 15: 04 New
      0
      In general, one must understand that the native "elite" that came to power as a result of the collapse of the USSR sees the greatest danger to their power in Russia, suspecting the Russian leadership of striving to return to Soviet times. Therefore, any calls from the Russian side for integration are perceived by the native elites as attempts to deprive them of their power. It seemed to them that the United States, other Western countries, China, Turkey were allegedly sincerely interested in disinterested friendship and assistance. However, recently there is gradually coming to an understanding that in modern conditions it is possible to preserve its sovereignty and survive in general only together .Russia is also interested in a common market with these republics and ensuring security on its borders. In conditions when NATO countries, China, Turkey are trying to use the resources of these countries in their own interests and and repel them from cooperation with Russia, our Foreign Ministry, Foreign Intelligence Service, mines the economy and the government as a whole need to pay special attention to this important area. For this, an interdepartmental committee headed by the Deputy Prime Minister to coordinate actions and report on the results achieved.
  2. Mavrikiy
    Mavrikiy 6 September 2020 15: 07 New
    -4
    In the photo from the left is the reincarnation of Novodvorskaya.
  3. Alien From
    Alien From 6 September 2020 15: 08 New
    -15 qualifying.
    As practice shows, only with a whip! The gingerbread did not work)
  4. Same lech
    Same lech 6 September 2020 15: 08 New
    10
    How how ... to recruit applicants to educational institutions of Russia from problematic republics and from scratch put the commandments of Moses into their heads smile .
    But seriously there is the experience of the USSR ... there is the experience of the USA in penetrating the political elites of the republics ... there is nothing new here ... there would be a desire.
    1. Lipchanin
      Lipchanin 6 September 2020 15: 33 New
      -3
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      there would be a desire.

      I have. I do not distinguish by nationality on the site
      1. Same lech
        Same lech 6 September 2020 15: 40 New
        -2
        I have. I do not distinguish by nationality on the site

        There was such an organization in the USSR at one time ... The Comintern is called ... it can be revived on the basis of new ideas attractive to ordinary citizens of various countries ... don't say so, but Comrade Trotsky knew how to set fire to the color, that is, the world revolution ... skillfully use his heritage.
        1. Lipchanin
          Lipchanin 6 September 2020 15: 56 New
          -1
          Quote: The same LYOKHA
          There was such an organization in the USSR at one time ... The Comintern is called ..

          Alexey, well, I can't divide it into ours. I understand with my mind, with my heart. Well, I can't be an enemy of a Ukrainian, a Georgian, a Belarusian. Who's upstairs, yes. But people don't
        2. Kronos
          Kronos 6 September 2020 16: 10 New
          -1
          On what principles? You cannot become more economically attractive than the West, the ideology is exactly the same.
          1. Same lech
            Same lech 6 September 2020 16: 12 New
            -1
            On what principles? You cannot become more economically attractive than the West, the ideology is exactly the same.

            I do not know ... what maybe bright young minds will offer something ... how to come to universal happiness without letting the giblets out of those who disagree.
          2. iouris
            iouris 7 September 2020 00: 17 New
            0
            Quote: Kronos
            You cannot become more economically attractive than the West, the ideology is exactly the same.

            Well, that means "Etastrana" is not needed by anyone. It's over.
        3. Lipchanin
          Lipchanin 6 September 2020 16: 17 New
          +5
          My wife died 7 years ago. The neighbors are Armenians. So they helped. I still thank you for their help.
          1. Same lech
            Same lech 6 September 2020 16: 20 New
            +3
            My wife died 7 years ago. The neighbors are Armenians. So they helped. I still thank you for their help.

            I worked at one time with people from the southern republics ... for the most part they are the same people as we are ... as in any other people. smile ... always forged friendly relations and never showed aggression towards them ... it all depends on the upbringing of a particular person.
            1. Lipchanin
              Lipchanin 6 September 2020 16: 25 New
              -1
              Quote: The same LYOKHA
              I worked at one time with people from the southern republics ... for the most part they are the same people as we are ... as in any other people.

              He served in the SA. The percentage of freaks is about the same
        4. dgonni
          dgonni 6 September 2020 16: 37 New
          0
          Just the same Lev Davidovich knew how to get money and a carefree life on a beautiful idea. Which, by the way, to the masses, he knew how to masterly sniff. By the way, his friend and accomplice Yasha, who by his patronymic Moiseevich and by the last name Sverdlov was the same virtuoso in cashing the ideas of communism into loot and gold.
          So Lev did not set fire to anything there for the money of the country and the proletariat, but stupidly took it out of the cordon and shoved it into the banks!
          And although both Lyova and Yasha still considered Stalin a small Schniper, fit only for the rough work of extracting money from banks for the benefit of the world type of revolution. But Joseph was a practitioner and did not like the arrogant kidalov. For which, in principle, Lev paid. However, like Yasha for attempting to take away powers from the lurid illich, and again it is not clear where the loot has gone. Uh-huh Yagoda is a witness along with Yasha's safe.
          So there is no need for a new Comintern. As practice has shown, this is money down the drain. And nothing better than normal business interests between countries has not been invented.
          1. Same lech
            Same lech 6 September 2020 17: 13 New
            +1
            Yeah ... the United States shows how to have a normal business relationship ... do you really believe that ... in the world of capital, the main thing is profit at any cost.
        5. Ryaruav
          Ryaruav 6 September 2020 20: 28 New
          +2
          here is Comrade Lech, go and set fire to the world revolution, but please get away from Russia
  5. Svetlana
    Svetlana 6 September 2020 15: 11 New
    0
    >> the last friendly country <
    She's not really the last. From the Slavonic, yes, but not from the Soviet.
  6. zyablik.olga
    zyablik.olga 6 September 2020 15: 13 New
    24
    Until Russia has a viable development model and a regime of the greatest prosperity for its own population, there can be no talk of any confidence on the part of the former Soviet republics.
    1. saigon
      saigon 6 September 2020 15: 21 New
      +2
      zyablik.olga (Olga)
      Today, 15: 13
      +1
      Until Russia has a viable development model and a regime of the greatest prosperity for its own population, there can be no talk of any confidence on the part of the former Soviet republics.

      That is, to follow the imperial course, to raise the standard of living in the country.
      You have to change a lot and bear the temptation to others.
      1. Matthias
        Matthias 6 September 2020 15: 59 New
        0
        to follow the imperial course, to raise the standard of living in the country.
        the imperial course is synonymous with a poor and powerless people. Dictators like Lukashenka may appreciate such a proposal, but among the people you will only make enemies for yourself.
  7. iouris
    iouris 6 September 2020 15: 23 New
    -18 qualifying.
    How to win the trust of the Nazis? It's very simple: arrange everything as in Odessa. But first, repent for the occupation and colonization.
    1. Same lech
      Same lech 6 September 2020 15: 35 New
      -4
      The cellars of the Nazis are bored, dear one. what
  8. Ross xnumx
    Ross xnumx 6 September 2020 15: 24 New
    +9
    How Russia can win the trust of the former Soviet republics

    To embark on the socialist path of development and not allow spread rot on our own people ... And people will reach out ... yes
    1. Same lech
      Same lech 6 September 2020 15: 34 New
      -11 qualifying.
      To embark on the socialist path of development and not allow spread rot on our own people ... And people will reach out ...
      Are you proposing to arrange another revolution?
      1. evgen1221
        evgen1221 6 September 2020 15: 43 New
        +7
        And by evolution, the population will die out to wait when these steal enough and take over the country.
        1. Same lech
          Same lech 6 September 2020 15: 45 New
          -7
          Well, how in any revolution the revolutionaries must kill half of the people who do not agree with their ideas ... they will not torment you with pangs of conscience? ... you will have to kill innocent people along the way. hi
  9. pro100y.belarus
    pro100y.belarus 6 September 2020 15: 27 New
    +5
    Belarus is a lie, violence, dishonest elections, propaganda, elimination of dissent, irreplaceable ...
    Russia - lies, violence, dishonest elections, propaganda, elimination of dissent, irreplaceable ... plus corruption, theft, nepotism, Jews, oligarchs ...
    Do you seriously think that Belarusians will want to unite?
    1. Same lech
      Same lech 6 September 2020 15: 29 New
      -8
      Do you seriously think that Belarusians will want to unite?

      You yourself are a liar ... since you are trying to speak for the entire people of Belarus.
      Do you admit Soros's chick ?.
      1. The eye of the crying
        The eye of the crying 6 September 2020 16: 06 New
        10
        Not for the entire people of Belarus, but about the situation in the country. He probably lives in it and knows better. Although irreplaceable and visible outside Belarus.
        1. Same lech
          Same lech 6 September 2020 16: 14 New
          -8
          He probably lives in it and knows better.

          Yeah .. maybe he's sitting in Poland. what
    2. Matthias
      Matthias 6 September 2020 15: 56 New
      +7
      Do you seriously think that Belarusians will want to unite?
      they don’t care about the Belarusians, local Russian patriots, here they are generally offered to press and genocide with tanks, people in Russia have never been appreciated.
      They want to unite the territory with industry, and therefore they support the criminal usurper, appease him with billions of dollars in gifts.
      1. Same lech
        Same lech 6 September 2020 16: 02 New
        -3
        Well, I don’t know ... I consider myself a patriot of my country ... but I never called on people to crush people in any country with tanks.
        For me, the overthrow of Lukashenka with the help of a color revolution is a classic crime ... try, for example, in Germany, to organize the overthrow of Merkel after her elections on the basis of non-recognition of third-party election officials ... this is already a scam in its purest form ... what the opposition of Belarus is doing together with Poland and Baltics.
        1. Matthias
          Matthias 6 September 2020 16: 25 New
          +7
          In a state governed by the rule of law, only the people can be the only legitimate source of power, and accordingly, the overthrow of the usurper is legal, regardless of what kind of scribbling this criminal in his own interests writes on the stamp paper and approves the state seal.
          The overthrow of Merkel is simply impossible to organize, unlike dictators, she received her power in a competitive struggle and there is not even a reason to suspect her of falsification.
          1. Same lech
            Same lech 6 September 2020 16: 36 New
            -4
            And what do you think of yourself to speak on behalf of the people? ... no one authorized you to do this ... then what you say is a call to overthrow the current government ... then you are a criminal and your place is in prison.
            As for Merkel, you can apply the same Orange Revolution methodology to her that you and your (colored) orange revolutionaries use. hi
            1. Matthias
              Matthias 6 September 2020 16: 51 New
              +4
              And what do you think of yourself to speak on behalf of the people? ...
              I am not speaking on behalf of the people. I live in a completely different country, but sometimes I visit Belarus, I have many acquaintances from there, I follow the events, therefore I have no doubts that it is the mustachioed usurper who is the main enemy of the Belarusian people.
              means what you say is a call to overthrow the current government
              that's how the people have the right to revolt
              then you are a criminal and your place is in jail.
              from the point of view of Lukashenka it is. He said in a direct tect who is against his power - that criminal :)
              As for Merkel, you can apply the same technique of the Orange Revolution to her.
              and then she will easily spread her opponents in debates, call her supporters, and hold a fair election.
              In Paris or Berdin, mass protests are so commonplace that they are not something extraordinary and force majeure. Unlike the kings from the CIS, European politicians do not find it difficult to conduct a dialogue with opponents.
              1. Same lech
                Same lech 6 September 2020 16: 56 New
                -7
                So live in your own country and do not meddle in a foreign country with calls for the overthrow of the government ... call better to overthrow your government. Each country lives by its own rules and laws and traditions and it is not for you to decide how it should live.
                1. Matthias
                  Matthias 6 September 2020 17: 29 New
                  +5
                  Excuse me, but who are you to tell me?
                  I don’t know how it is with you, but a person does not need to ask permission in order to express his opinion.
                  There is no tradition or law in this world that would oblige you to be silent while atrocities occur among neighbors.
                  1. Same lech
                    Same lech 6 September 2020 17: 34 New
                    -8
                    You do these atrocities like you ... interfering in the internal affairs of other countries ... that's why I'm telling you not to meddle ... I don't meddle in Germany's internal affairs ... that's why here I take an uncompromising position and will fight with people like you always ... because after Belarus you will climb into Russia with new attempts to arrange another bloody revolution in it ... we have already gone through this.
                    1. Matthias
                      Matthias 6 September 2020 17: 50 New
                      +5
                      Do these atrocities like you
                      you call this support of the Belarusian people "outrage"? All the same, our swami's views on law and order are different ...
                      I do not meddle in the internal affairs of Germany ..
                      in general, you climb, Russia is actively funding various parties throughout the European Union, trying to bribe officials.
                      so here I take an uncompromising position and will fight with people like you always
                      your position is simple, clear and well known - to support the dictatorship around the world, nothing new.
                      because after Belarus you will climb to Russia

                      while only hordes of your guest workers climb to us.
                      1. Same lech
                        Same lech 6 September 2020 17: 53 New
                        -8
                        do you call this support of the Belarusian people "outrage"?

                        Supporting the Belarusian opposition, which presses on the riot police officers on cars, is a crime ... calls to stop work at Belarusian enterprises is a crime ... calls to kill special forces and their families is a crime ... the opposition of Belarus can already be invoiced ... but just like to you.
                      2. Matthias
                        Matthias 6 September 2020 18: 07 New
                        +1
                        Firstly, the ossified riot militants themselves threw themselves at passing cars, no one pressed them on purpose, you can clearly see this in many videos.
                        Secondly, isolated cases are not the whole opposition.
                        Calling for a boycott is not a crime, why would it?
                        There were no calls for violent actions towards the security forces.
                        What and to whom can an illegal usurper show? The right of the strong to present? Lukashenka's court "by concepts" has nothing to do with law, law and justice.
                      3. Same lech
                        Same lech 6 September 2020 18: 11 New
                        -5
                        Since when did the civil servants of Belarus become militants ... you have beguiled something dear ... probably plus or minus ... you probably want to see how they deal with the riot police of Belarus like the Berkut ... you will not wait ...
                        Now it is clear that you are one of those who provide informational support to the Belarusian opposition by throwing all kinds of lies about Lukashenka and the authorities of Belarus ... nothing new.
                      4. Matthias
                        Matthias 6 September 2020 18: 23 New
                        +8
                        Since when did civil servants of Belarus become militants
                        Since then, as they went into the service of the usurper, they changed the oath. In general, they should protect those who were beaten with passion.
                        Now it is clear that you are one of those who provide informational support to the Belarusian opposition by stuffing all kinds of lies
                        More about Soros and the Illuminati write something.
                        Indeed, after all, the people cannot be against any irreplaceable dictator ?!
                        We are slaves of God -> all power is from God -> we are slaves of power (its representatives), who should be meek and humble.
                        Whoever disagrees is a servant of Satan and an agent of the State Department.
                      5. Dart2027
                        Dart2027 6 September 2020 18: 55 New
                        +2
                        Quote: Matthias
                        Indeed, after all, the people cannot be against any irreplaceable dictator ?!

                        What kind of people.
                        Quote: Matthias
                        he is a servant of Satan and an agent of the State Department.

                        In principle, it is really the same thing.
                      6. tralflot1832
                        tralflot1832 6 September 2020 20: 59 New
                        -2
                        We recognized the elections of Lukashenka, the People's Republic of China recognized even the main Turk admitted. And that you do not like the results of the vote count, this is your protestant opinion. So the riot police act heroically to protect the legally elected government and the people who elected this government. Contact the European sports lotto they will help you And you will soon answer for the threats to the population of Lukashenko A.G. supporters. Europe has no instrument of influencing Hrygorych, he is not Janik. The Belarusian people were lucky with the president. 100 protestors, this is not all the people. Go to work tomorrow? Or protest yours Job?
                      7. Revival
                        Revival 7 September 2020 01: 25 New
                        0
                        I agree, we are professionals in elections and voting
                2. DrEng527
                  DrEng527 7 September 2020 12: 16 New
                  +1
                  Quote: Matthias
                  There were no calls for violent actions towards the security forces.

                  and against their families?
                  Quote: Matthias
                  What and to whom can an illegal usurper show?

                  do you know the election results? if not a secret - where?
              2. Revival
                Revival 7 September 2020 01: 24 New
                +2
                1. Let's objectively.
                2. There were 2 collisions for the entire time! Only 2!
                3. Calling for a strike is not a crime!
          2. New Year day
            New Year day 6 September 2020 17: 58 New
            +7
            Quote: The same LYOKHA
            because after Belarus you will climb into Russia with new attempts to arrange another bloody revolution in it ..

            YOU and Putin have already entered Belarus

            and get a reply.
          3. sniperino
            sniperino 6 September 2020 18: 13 New
            -1
            Don't feed the troll. Each of your comments with arguments (albeit for others) is used by him only in order to pour the next portion of new dirt on our country, depicting a "discussion", and get a pretty penny, and maybe a whole hryvnia.
    3. Dart2027
      Dart2027 6 September 2020 17: 33 New
      -1
      Quote: Matthias
      I am not speaking on behalf of the people. I live in a completely different country, but sometimes I visit Belarus, I have many acquaintances from there, I follow the events, therefore I have no doubts that it is the mustachioed usurper who is the main enemy of the Belarusian people.

      Something familiar
      1. Matthias
        Matthias 6 September 2020 17: 55 New
        +4
        The war in Syria began long before the international intervention.
        If Assad has such popular support, why does the Iranian militia and the Russian air force make up the basis of his army, why did the cities leave his control without firing a shot, and to "return to the historic harbor" they have to be smashed into rubble?
        1. Dart2027
          Dart2027 6 September 2020 18: 52 New
          -4
          Quote: Matthias
          The war in Syria began long before the international intervention.

          Yes, yes, yes ... And well, no one at all created or supported all these DIASH.
          Quote: Matthias
          cities got out of his control without firing a shot

          Before the appearance of the Iranians and Russians, well, no one fought at all.
          1. Matthias
            Matthias 6 September 2020 19: 10 New
            0
            Yes, yes, yes ... And well, no one at all created or supported all these DIASH.
            That is how

            Before the appearance of the Iranians and Russians, well, no one fought at all.
            Exactly so [2]. Before the arrival of Russia and Iran, Assad controlled ~ 20% of the Syrian territory, and then conditionally.
            1. Dart2027
              Dart2027 6 September 2020 19: 57 New
              -2
              Quote: Matthias
              That is how

              Quote: Matthias
              Assad controlled ~ 20% of Syrian territory

              Repeat the picture?
      2. New Year day
        New Year day 6 September 2020 18: 00 New
        +5
        and how long will Assad hold out without Russia? Russia will leave Syria and will be like in Afghanistan. History teaches. that nobody reads it
        1. Dart2027
          Dart2027 6 September 2020 18: 53 New
          -3
          Quote: Silvestr
          Russia will leave Syria and will be like in Afghanistan.

          And what does it change in the fact that (as in Afghanistan) all this opposition was created by the United States.
          1. New Year day
            New Year day 6 September 2020 19: 03 New
            +3
            Quote: Dart2027
            And what does it change in the fact

            does not change, but the question is, how much did it cost the USSR? And how much will it cost Russia?
            1. Dart2027
              Dart2027 6 September 2020 19: 08 New
              -5
              Quote: Silvestr
              does not change, but the question is

              That is, we do not argue with the fact that all these "fighters" are supported by the State Department - it's already good.
              Quote: Silvestr
              And how much will it cost Russia?

              Defending yourself on the territory of other states is always cheaper.
            2. New Year day
              New Year day 6 September 2020 19: 13 New
              +3
              Quote: Dart2027
              That is, we do not argue with the fact that all these "fighters" are supported by the State Department - it's already good.

              so we ourselves supported and raised nationalists in Ukraine
              Quote: Dart2027
              Defending yourself on the territory of other states is always cheaper.

              why can't it work?
            3. Dart2027
              Dart2027 6 September 2020 19: 59 New
              -5
              Quote: Silvestr
              so we ourselves supported and raised

              Are we communists? It was in the USSR that national elites were raised.
              Quote: Silvestr
              what doesn't work

              And what are they fighting on the territory of Russia?
  10. Revival
    Revival 7 September 2020 01: 29 New
    +2
    Well, do not disgrace yourself! (once again).
    In Syria, just a civil war, which, as always, got into a bunch of countries in their interests!
    At least read the story about Syria and the Assad family ...
    1. Dart2027
      Dart2027 7 September 2020 19: 16 New
      0
      Quote: Revival
      There is just a civil war in Syria

      In which one of the parties is represented by all kinds of terrorists, whom they are trying to present as some kind of opposition.
      Quote: Revival
      At least read the story about Syria and the Assad family

      This is when the late Assad quickly and decisively suppressed the Muslim Brotherhood's protest? What can I say - well done.
      Will you continue to disgrace?
      1. Revival
        Revival 7 September 2020 22: 06 New
        0
        If you strained and ineptly interpret reality substituting various names, with varying degrees of adequacy, then reality does not change from this following your fantasy.
        It was not about the composition of the participants in the civil war, but about the fact that it is as such, so stop shaming yourself breaking through the next bottom.
        Yes, and you can not answer me, otherwise someone else who reads fluently, does not understand and confuse us, then I will not wash it off.
        We will assume that you are absolutely right.
        1. Dart2027
          Dart2027 7 September 2020 22: 21 New
          +1
          Quote: Revival
          If you strained and ineptly interpret reality substituting various names, with varying degrees of adequacy, then reality does not change from this following your fantasy.

          That you are self-critical.
          Quote: Revival
          It was not about the composition of the participants in the civil war, but about the fact that it is as such

          That is, you acknowledge the fact that the notorious GW is just an invasion of all kinds of terrorists at the direction of the United States, but at the same time claim that this is GW? "Logical".
          Stop disgracing yourself by breaking another bottom.
        2. Revival
          Revival 7 September 2020 23: 55 New
          0
          Bye...
          Consider that you are absolutely right, just don't write me this nonsense again
        3. Dart2027
          Dart2027 8 September 2020 19: 07 New
          0
          Quote: Revival
          just don't write me this nonsense again

          That you are self-critical.
        4. Revival
          Revival 8 September 2020 19: 15 New
          0
          Don't be so intrusive
        5. Dart2027
          Dart2027 8 September 2020 19: 56 New
          0
          Is that you about yourself?
  • Revival
    Revival 7 September 2020 01: 19 New
    0
    And how do you think the people of any country, in principle, have the right to revolt with the usurpation of power?
  • Same lech
    Same lech 6 September 2020 17: 07 New
    -5
    The overthrow of Merkel is simply impossible to organize, unlike dictators, she received her power in a competitive struggle and there is not even a reason to suspect her of falsification.

    What are you telling me tales ... then your politicians are always screaming about Russia's interference in the elections.
    1. Matthias
      Matthias 6 September 2020 17: 31 New
      -1
      Politicians are PR on anything, there would be a desire, but there is a reason.
      It's just that Russia is a country that is not a pity to kick, and there will be no surrender. So this technique is abused by all and sundry.
      1. iouris
        iouris 6 September 2020 21: 43 New
        -2
        Quote: Matthias
        Russia is a country that is not a pity to kick

        Yes. But she gets up from her knees, and still stands (albeit half bent).
        1. Matthias
          Matthias 6 September 2020 22: 24 New
          +1
          It got up in the late 90s and in the "happy" 00s, and now, after a decade of falling in all spheres, the situation in Russia has become worse than in the early-mid 90s. And it will only get worse, but stable.
          1. iouris
            iouris 7 September 2020 00: 16 New
            0
            Not. It won't be stable anymore.
        2. Revival
          Revival 7 September 2020 01: 29 New
          -1
          Strong....
          ..
  • The eye of the crying
    The eye of the crying 6 September 2020 17: 05 New
    0
    Quote: The same LYOKHA
    try, for example, in Germany to organize the overthrow of Merkel after her elections on the basis of non-recognition of outsiders in the elections ...


    First, let her (more precisely, her party) gain 80% in at least one election.
    1. Same lech
      Same lech 6 September 2020 17: 11 New
      -3
      First, let her (more precisely, her party) gain 80% in at least one election.
      It doesn't matter ... the main thing is work with the electorate ... 60-80-100, you can increase 150 percent and accuse Merkel of cheating ... lie so lie.
      1. The eye of the crying
        The eye of the crying 6 September 2020 17: 44 New
        0
        Quote: The same LYOKHA
        60-80-100, you can increase 150 percent and accuse Merkel of cheating ...


        Well, screw up Merkel 80%, then make her say "I have 80%." We'll talk later.
        1. Same lech
          Same lech 6 September 2020 17: 46 New
          -6
          Well, screw up Merkel 80%, then make her say "I have 80%."
          It makes no sense ... the main thing in the information war is to throw in a lie in time and it will go for a walk by itself.
          Nobody asks Lukashenka about 80 percent ... but a lot of colored revolutionaries have already hung shit on him ... so a people's war is going on on all fronts.
          1. The eye of the crying
            The eye of the crying 6 September 2020 17: 53 New
            +2
            Quote: The same LYOKHA
            the main thing is to throw in a lie in time and it will go for a walk by itself.


            Lukashenka himself said about 80%, no one threw in for him.

            But in general, you are kind of strange. Everything does not matter for you.
            1. Same lech
              Same lech 6 September 2020 17: 56 New
              -3
              Lukashenka relied on the official count of votes ... but what do you and your opposition rely on? ... on your fantasies or what? ... more than strange.
              She is a lie and a lie to Africa.
              1. The eye of the crying
                The eye of the crying 6 September 2020 17: 59 New
                +3
                Quote: The same LYOKHA
                Lukashenko relied on the official vote count


                And the official calculations, of course, do not lie simply by definition.

                Quote: The same Lech
                ... what do you and your opposition rely on?


                On unofficial calculations, of course. If you were even a little in the know, you would know.
                1. Same lech
                  Same lech 6 September 2020 18: 02 New
                  -5
                  On unofficial calculations, of course.

                  You can only wipe your unofficial calculations ... I will stamp as many such calculations on my printer as I like.
                  If you have doubts about the official calculations, file a lawsuit and seek justice by legal means ... and not by staging a coup.
                2. The eye of the crying
                  The eye of the crying 6 September 2020 18: 04 New
                  +4
                  Quote: The same LYOKHA
                  If you have doubts about the official calculations, file a lawsuit and seek justice by legal means.


                  Clear. Go already, ignoramus.
                3. Same lech
                  Same lech 6 September 2020 18: 05 New
                  -2
                  Shaw's arguments are over? ... a pity. smile ... so it all started well ... okay, I'll go to bed again tomorrow for work. hi
              2. Revival
                Revival 7 September 2020 01: 34 New
                -2
                And if the court insolently sends you, then what do you propose?
                For example, the court refused to recount the bulletins. Next what?
      2. Revival
        Revival 7 September 2020 01: 32 New
        0
        So did Merkel speak of 80 at least once without typing "80"? Or not?
  • IS-80_RVGK2
    IS-80_RVGK2 6 September 2020 16: 17 New
    -4
    Why not if we all have the same and common interests? laughing And what, by the way, can the high-quality ones offer us apart from shitty "we are European" pathos? You just like the Ukrainians think that by themselves represent some kind of value. Come on, nebro, get rid of illusions.
    1. Same lech
      Same lech 6 September 2020 16: 23 New
      -6
      Come on, nebro, get rid of illusions.

      I have had no illusions for a long time ... about your brother.
      The orange revolutionary is immediately visible. smile
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. The comment was deleted.
                1. The comment was deleted.
                  1. The comment was deleted.
  • Terrible GMO
    Terrible GMO 6 September 2020 16: 45 New
    +3
    Quote: pro100y.belarus
    plus corruption, theft, nepotism, Jews, oligarchs ...

    Add these items to the list for Belarus too. In our country, however, the "oligarchs" are only those who are close to Lukashenka. Like his Armenian friends to whom they sell breweries in Brest for a pittance, Serbs who can build anything in the center of Minsk and Grodno in violation of all norms, and the Arabs are given tens of hectares of forest surrounded by thorns for personal use.

    But there are no Jews. All were killed by the Germans request
  • iouris
    iouris 6 September 2020 21: 41 New
    -3
    Quote: pro100y.belarus
    Do you seriously think that Belarusians will want to unite?

    Who is going to ask them? (Names, passwords, appearances ...)
    Yes. And who are the "Belarusians"?
  • rocket757
    rocket757 6 September 2020 15: 33 New
    +2
    A common past theme, but as an additional one. Agreements will not work, they will intercept, rip, lure, and this is a fact !!!
    As then??? It looks like you have to start with YOURSELF !!!
    And this "our" zhl / O / would understand, accept, they will never be able ... greedy without measure!
    No more prospects are in sight, so ... nothing good in the future!
    1. Feliks m
      Feliks m 6 September 2020 15: 59 New
      +2
      Neither carrot nor whip will help. First, as long as the states have an interest in containing Russia or playing a game of its collapse. Second, until Russia becomes a rich and self-sufficient country, only then the former republics will be attracted like a metal to a magnet. Well, or wars will not change the situation, a nightmare option.
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 6 September 2020 16: 13 New
        +4
        Quote: Feliks m
        The second is until Russia becomes a rich and self-sufficient country,

        Remaining rich and self-sufficient, but in a situation where the mass of working people, CREATORS, will be robbed even by their own rich .... no, no, not a penny of attractiveness.
      2. New Year day
        New Year day 6 September 2020 18: 03 New
        10
        Quote: Feliks m
        The second is until Russia becomes a rich and self-sufficient country

        with such managers - never
  • apro
    apro 6 September 2020 15: 36 New
    +4
    The question sounds strange .. trust. What is the purpose of gaining trust? Lately it is associated with fraud.
    And if you look realistically, today in the countries of the former republics of the USSR, capitalism of different development. And the law of financial expediency is in effect. And everyone wants to make money on someone ... or throw. If Russian capitalists want to return the markets. The ability to exploit these countries. That is one question . and if you are integrating ... why?
  • evgen1221
    evgen1221 6 September 2020 15: 41 New
    -2
    I feel that the article will collect a lot of comments. Any state and system is always people and their upbringing, morality and purpose. What of this does not the Russian Federation have? Total.
  • Nikolaevich I
    Nikolaevich I 6 September 2020 15: 43 New
    +9
    How can Russia gain trust? Mdaaa ... We lived ...! The only question is in this form? And "how can the former Soviet republics win Russia's confidence?" doesn't roll anymore? And why ?...
    1. New Year day
      New Year day 6 September 2020 18: 06 New
      +9
      Quote: Nikolaevich I
      And "how can the former Soviet republics win Russia's confidence?" doesn't roll anymore? And why ?..

      Have you noticed that Russia has ceased to be an attraction not only for the former USSR countries, but also for others?
      What example is Russia showing to its neighbors? - Zeroing and voting in toilets, falling living standards of the population? An example with a "-" sign, alas request
      1. Alexander X
        Alexander X 7 September 2020 08: 32 New
        +1
        About the attractiveness of Russia to others: no one will dispute the fact that Russia is flooded with immigrants from the Asian republics. This means that Russia is attractive for them. And the Chinese are also going. Ukrainians - so many come in large numbers ... Belarusians, Moldovans. I constantly meet their teams in the garden plots of the Russians. And the fact that the national elites do not want reunification is so in the kingdom of the blind and the one-eyed king. And in a big empire where to go? And the striped owner will not allow ...
  • seacap
    seacap 6 September 2020 15: 47 New
    12
    And what can we offer them all? The authorities are still the same people who betrayed and killed the state, who betrayed their ideals, violating oaths and commitments, betrayed friends and allies, surrendering them to the enemy for destruction, and, very often in the literal sense of the word. , if everyone in the world, without exception, looks at us as idiots, venal and poor, with whom you cannot have any business or normal relations. How can you deal with a person who opened the gates to his enemy and gave the country to plunder, and the people and friends to violence and abuse? The republics of Central Asia and Transcaucasia, almost on their knees begged not to destroy the country, they were forcibly pushed out, destroyed their education and science, economy, and most importantly the community of people, the traditional communal system, everything and everyone began to measure for the loot, threw, in fact, their the lands and peoples to the mercy of fate, which were collected and united by our great ancestors, watched as they were freely developed by hostile powers, and at our own expense, forcing us to pay our expenses and our profits, as well as to support our economies. , only the next concerns, smearing snot on whipped cheeks and utter helplessness, failure of the upper class, which neither intellectually nor mentally does not closely match the level of problems that have arisen because of their betrayal and epoch-making crime.
    1. Same lech
      Same lech 6 September 2020 15: 50 New
      -5
      In our country, only regular concerns, smearing of snot on whipped cheeks and complete helplessness, failure of the upper class, which neither intellectually nor mentally does not closely match the level of problems that have arisen because of their betrayal and epoch-making crime.

      They stepped on a sore spot. crying
    2. New Year day
      New Year day 6 September 2020 18: 11 New
      +9
      Quote: seacap
      if everyone in the world, without exception, looks at us as idiots, venal and poor, with whom it is impossible to have any business and normal relations.

      and not only that. The estimates are much worse. The Russian authorities have discriminated against Russia itself.
      What do you think, the opus of the official person of Russia Zakharova

      added sympathy of Serbs and other peoples? Rudeness and arrogance, snobbery and indifference are what a person sees
      1. Revival
        Revival 7 September 2020 01: 39 New
        +1
        This is a monstrous disgrace!
        The bottom of the frontal armor of the tank was pierced with a whistle and a crash !!!
    3. Nikolaevich I
      Nikolaevich I 6 September 2020 19: 03 New
      +6
      Quote: seacap
      And what can we offer them all? The power is still the same people who betrayed and killed the state ...

      Alas! No matter how bitter it is to realize it, you are right! At one time, the USSR did not disintegrate, but it was destroyed by the very people who are now the "backbone" of the current ruling regime! For, not all Soviet republics wanted to leave the Union! And later, many years of humiliation and self-humiliation by the ruling regime of the country, the nation ... betrayal of their interests and allies ... And this is all in the sight of the whole world ... and this was observed by the former Soviet republics! But, as they say, not a silver lining! There was enough time to rethink everything, realize mistakes, build new relationships, start a "new" life! I, personally, am categorically against the restoration of the former (!) Union! I have not felt nostalgia and regret for the USSR for a long time! It is very useful for the state to become the center of attraction again, but in a different and different way! Unfortunately, this did not happen ... it did not happen "thanks to" the existing initially face-to-face concept of state power, which has guided the ruling regime for all these years ... which the ruling regime does not change and, it seems, is not going to change! Russia never became an economically and socially attractive country for "others" ... but it managed to quarrel with half the world!
  • parusnik
    parusnik 6 September 2020 15: 51 New
    11
    The basis for victory in the ideological confrontation with the West can only be real victories and bright achievements of Russia, which the former Soviet republics will want to be equal to.
    ... Yes, Russia does not oppose the West. Absolutely. Back in 1991, a course was taken towards rapprochement with the West, as it was written then that Russia should fit into the Western economy and accept Western values. Slowly Russia fit in. What is happening now is just economic contradictions between partners. The President is constantly talking about the fact that the West and Russia are partners. What is the confrontation? What are you speaking about? And then, what are these real victories? ... Whom do you need to defeat? There are enough victories, for example, it is stated that the middle class in Russia is those who receive 17 thousand, and there are a lot of achievements, where you do not look only achievements ... Just level up and take an example. Only it doesn't work ..
    1. Same lech
      Same lech 6 September 2020 15: 55 New
      -6
      What is happening now is just economic contradictions between partners.
      Yes ... good here comrade Lenin clearly said
      THE STATE IS A DEVICE OF OPERATION CLASS

      https://ru.wikisource.org/wiki/Государство_и_революция_(Ленин)/Глава_I

      Where are we going again? ... I think again to the old rake.
      1. parusnik
        parusnik 6 September 2020 16: 55 New
        +7
        We have already arranged a disco on the old rake ... And what do you mean is not even a rake, hoes ... it's different: scythes, pitchforks ... And what kind of propaganda can be carried out in the former Soviet republics? About the fact that Russian capitalism is better than the Baltic or Georgian, Armenian ..? They understand this at the level of citizens and go to Russia to earn money ...
  • Simon schempp
    Simon schempp 6 September 2020 15: 58 New
    +7
    The question is not so much even about the huge investments that sensible, professional and systematic propaganda requires. Yes, yes, it is she - no need to frown in disgust upon hearing this word, we cannot do without her!

    Rave. Who needs Russian propaganda?
    You are truly out of touch with reality. Which NGOs, which Soros books?
    A person from Belarus or Ukraine simply sees with his own eyes how Europeans live, what their salaries are, what roads, what kind of medicine, and then tells their surroundings. Nobody is promoting it.
    What do you suggest? Open Russian NGOs? And what will they tell? That Russia is the best country in the world? So who will believe them? Will you print books? And who will read them?
    Until Russia is associated in the world with the top social sphere, top-end medicine, top-end culture, top-end cars and planes, ships and missiles, there can be no talk of any attractiveness.
    Now Russia in the eyes of the post-Soviet space is millitarism, it is constant threats to "return" the territory, constant statements about the worthlessness and insolvency of the latter.
    It’s not books that are needed, brains are needed.
    1. Same lech
      Same lech 6 September 2020 16: 09 New
      -5
      Well, you are also out of touch with reality.
      You do not notice the blatant lies of the Western media ... they lie literally in everything ... they accuse Russia of aggression, and NATO themselves drove them to the borders of Russia ... bombed Yugoslavia ... poisoned the Skripals and blamed everything on Russia, etc ... lies ... lies and again lies are pouring out of your mouth ... you are worthy disciples of Goebbels.
      1. Simon schempp
        Simon schempp 6 September 2020 16: 15 New
        +5
        accuse Russia of aggression and NATO themselves drove to the borders of Russia ... bombed Yugoslavia ... poisoned the Skripals and blamed everything on Russia, etc.

        What does Yugoslavia have to do with it? And Skripali?
        I'm talking about the attitude of the post-Soviet countries towards the West and Russia.
        1. Same lech
          Same lech 6 September 2020 16: 21 New
          -7
          And what does Russian propaganda have to do with it? ... you yourself are deliberately throwing this cliché. Pay attention to what you say, because you can answer with the same coin. hi
          1. Simon schempp
            Simon schempp 6 September 2020 18: 35 New
            +5
            And what does Russian propaganda have to do with it? ... you yourself are deliberately throwing this cliché.

            Wipe your eyes. The term "Russian propaganda" was thrown in by the author of the article.
        2. IS-80_RVGK2
          IS-80_RVGK2 6 September 2020 17: 27 New
          0
          Which of course happened by itself without any false propaganda. Oha.
      2. New Year day
        New Year day 6 September 2020 18: 14 New
        +9
        Quote: The same LYOKHA
        . lie ... lie and again lies pouring out of your mouth ... you are worthy disciples of Goebbels.

        your words may well be attributed to Skabeeva and Kisilev, Simonyats. Birds of a feather
      3. Revival
        Revival 7 September 2020 01: 44 New
        0
        Let's point by point.

        “A person from Belarus or Ukraine simply sees with his own eyes how Europeans live, what their salaries are, what roads, what kind of medicine, and then tells their surroundings.”

        What will we tell them about our medicine, salary, pension, roads, etc.?

        Will you tell us that all this is bigger and better with us? Without blushing?
    2. Dart2027
      Dart2027 6 September 2020 17: 36 New
      0
      Quote: Simon Schempp
      A person from Belarus or Ukraine simply sees with his own eyes how Europeans live, what their salaries are, what roads, what kind of medicine, and then tells their surroundings.

      But if you want to, you can find a lot of details about all of the above, but when you start talking about it, then everyone starts an attack of deafness.
      1. Revival
        Revival 7 September 2020 01: 46 New
        0
        And apart from subtle details, there is nothing more to say? Well, you won't get far ..
        1. Dart2027
          Dart2027 7 September 2020 19: 14 New
          +1
          Quote: Revival
          And apart from subtle details, there is nothing more to say

          And everything is in them. The fine print should always be read in contracts.
  • satelit24
    satelit24 6 September 2020 16: 07 New
    -1
    Slavs would have collected! The rest - so by interests))
    1. apro
      apro 6 September 2020 16: 09 New
      +2
      Quote: satelit24
      Slavs would have collected

      And what do they lack of their own masters?
  • The comment was deleted.
    1. IS-80_RVGK2
      IS-80_RVGK2 6 September 2020 17: 31 New
      -4
      "Krymchanin" if you feel bad in Russia you can go to Ukraine there you will be fine. And tell me how you were oppressed by the bloody Putin regime and what kind of Ukrainian you are to the marrow of your bones they will kiss you. Only if we're not expecting you back.
    2. Dart2027
      Dart2027 6 September 2020 17: 37 New
      +1
      Quote: ivymotek
      fought gas and trade wars with Ukraine, they still could not get drunk on the dough, and then the seizure of Crimea and intervention in the Donbass, which in fact led to the complete loss of Ukraine

      So it was the Russian oligarchs who staged a coup there?
    3. New Year day
      New Year day 6 September 2020 18: 18 New
      +7
      Quote: ivymotek
      The seizure of the Ukrainian Crimea in 2014 is Putin's catastrophic mistake.

      on the other hand, Putin earned medals for uniting Ukrainians against Russia, and after meeting with Luka - also from the Belarusians. Those who think that Belarusians sleep and see themselves in Russia are mistaken. Changing Luka to Putin is like changing an awl for soap. Let's wait until the anti-Lukashenka processions take on the character of anti-Russian request
      1. ivymotek
        ivymotek 6 September 2020 18: 29 New
        +6
        I agree with you. Sometimes I have the feeling that Putin is a sent Cossack, that he is an agent of the State Department. He did everything to destroy all friendships
  • Andvigor
    Andvigor 6 September 2020 16: 19 New
    +3
    Gain trust ?! Yes, there is nothing simpler, the well-known method of our "pornners"!
    To lend money, and tore it up for every penny so that they would give it away for the race, they ran until it arrived.
    Then they will start to respect, and as you throw them in, they will fall in love, for leaving them on a crust of bread!
  • withoutreverse
    withoutreverse 6 September 2020 16: 26 New
    15
    while in Russia there are thieves, and corrupt officials, and oligarchs officials and their children. chiefs of all departments. not one country from the post-Soviet space .. it is unlikely that we will be attractive to them.
  • Vladimir61
    Vladimir61 6 September 2020 16: 30 New
    +7
    To act according to the principle - Russia first of all! This is the development of science, technology, economy, raising the living standards of the population, high-quality and affordable education and medicine, eradicating corruption, ensuring the country's security - from any threats.
    We will be strong, we will be needed and in demand!
    1. Revival
      Revival 7 September 2020 01: 49 New
      -4
      Well then, apparently we arrived ...
  • Tired
    Tired 6 September 2020 16: 32 New
    +8
    The West is much richer than Russia. Accordingly, we can offer our neighbors much less than our opponents. All discussions about propaganda against this background are meaningless. Any ideology is just a wrapper for the economy. And our economy is capitalist, like that of the USA / Europe, only much poorer.
  • Izotron 3-150
    Izotron 3-150 6 September 2020 16: 32 New
    0
    Put things in order, remove this mafia that is in power.
    I respect ordinary Russian people .... ordinary people are the same everywhere and can always come to an agreement.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.
  • Terrible GMO
    Terrible GMO 6 September 2020 16: 40 New
    +5
    Moscow is now rapidly making up for its own and others' omissions, striving as reliably as possible to bind the almost escaped Minsk to itself.

    In the choice between a friendly people and friendly regime, Moscow chose the regime.

    Why is the confidence of the citizens of the former USSR in Russia leaving ... hmm. Unclear. As if the hand of the West is to blame.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. The eye of the crying
        The eye of the crying 6 September 2020 18: 19 New
        +2
        Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
        Whom did the friendly people choose?


        Not who, but what. The candidate who (who) promised a fair election.

        Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
        Natsiks, liberals and small Belarusian bays with a program to sever economic ties with Russia and arrange another Somalia on its borders.


        Could you name in whose specific program (out of 5 candidates) you saw this? Does Lukashenka, the official winner? Or do you yourself think that the people did not choose him? smile
        1. Dart2027
          Dart2027 6 September 2020 19: 03 New
          +2
          Quote: Eye of the Crying
          The candidate who (who) promised a fair election

          Did she promise? this is serious.
          1. The eye of the crying
            The eye of the crying 6 September 2020 19: 04 New
            0
            Do you have any questions about whom and why you have chosen? Perfectly. As for promises, do you have a problem with promises in general, or just with her promise?
            1. Dart2027
              Dart2027 6 September 2020 19: 07 New
              -1
              Quote: Eye of the Crying
              Are you having trouble making promises in general, or

              That is, there is nothing but promises and will not be? Expected.
              1. The eye of the crying
                The eye of the crying 6 September 2020 19: 08 New
                +1
                You did not answer the question.
                1. Dart2027
                  Dart2027 6 September 2020 19: 10 New
                  +1
                  Quote: Eye of the Crying
                  You did not answer the question.

                  Which one? Do I believe the promises of someone out there that she will be honesty itself if given power? Nope, not a penny.
                  1. The eye of the crying
                    The eye of the crying 6 September 2020 19: 12 New
                    +1
                    Quote: Eye of the Crying
                    Do I believe the promises of someone out there that she will be honesty itself if given power?


                    No, that’s not the question. In what - see above.
              2. Terrible GMO
                Terrible GMO 6 September 2020 19: 39 New
                +3
                Quote: Dart2027
                That is, there is nothing but promises and will not be? Expected.

                The cockroach did not even have an election program on election day. Does he have anything other than promises?
                1. Dart2027
                  Dart2027 6 September 2020 20: 01 New
                  -1
                  Quote: TerribleGMO
                  The cockroach didn't even have an election program on election day

                  https://officelife.media/news/lukashenko-program-2020/
                  Will there be more lies?
                  1. Terrible GMO
                    Terrible GMO 7 September 2020 10: 01 New
                    0
                    Quote: Dart2027
                    Will there be more lies?

                    From him ? In full.
                    On the first day of early voting there was no program, and if there was something after it, it doesn't matter. This is simply an indicator of how much he does not care about "rats" which he considers every Belarusian and dirty cows, Russians who can be milked with impunity and spit on them. So I repeat once again, does “comrade” Lukashenka have anything other than empty and false promises?
                    He so vehemently accused Russia of an attempted coup d'état, attempts by a bank to sponsor an "appalling oath," hitting his heel in the chest that would defend independence.
                    And now he is crawling on his knees to Moscow and hanging on the phone with "Putin, pamagi! I'm your only and most faithful ally, we're in the same trenches. And give me some money."

                    Should I believe him?
                    1. Dart2027
                      Dart2027 7 September 2020 19: 13 New
                      +1
                      Quote: TerribleGMO
                      From him ?

                      From you.
                      Quote: TerribleGMO
                      On the first day of early voting there was no program, and if there was something after it, it does not matter.

                      If you read what I showed you, you will see that this is just 1 day of early voting.
        2. IS-80_RVGK2
          IS-80_RVGK2 6 September 2020 20: 01 New
          -1
          Quote: Eye of the Crying
          Does Lukashenka, the official winner? Or do you yourself think that the people did not choose him?

          That is, you corny lied to us that Tikhanovskaya won, but you don’t believe it yourself? Well, OK. Then, in general, what complaints can there be against us?
          1. The eye of the crying
            The eye of the crying 6 September 2020 20: 11 New
            0
            Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
            That is, you trite lied to us that Tikhanovskaya won


            I do not know on behalf of which collective you speak, but you have hallucinations.

            Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
            but you don’t believe it yourself?


            Whether Tikhanovskaya won - I don't know. But I know that the election result is falsified.
            1. IS-80_RVGK2
              IS-80_RVGK2 6 September 2020 20: 16 New
              -1
              Quote: Eye of the Crying
              Whether Tikhanovskaya won - I don't know.

              What then do you want from us sign-quality? It turns out you don't know what you really want. Can you take the pills and let go?
              1. The eye of the crying
                The eye of the crying 6 September 2020 20: 22 New
                -1
                Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                What then do you want from us sign-quality?


                You asked a question - I answered. Problems? Do not post answers on the forums.

                Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                you don't know nichrome yourself


                You have difficulty understanding the text. I clearly wrote what I know and what I don't.
                1. IS-80_RVGK2
                  IS-80_RVGK2 6 September 2020 20: 28 New
                  -2
                  Quote: Eye of the Crying
                  You asked a question - I answered. Problems? Do not post answers on the forums.

                  There were two questions. But you answered, if it can be called an answer to only one, and you start wagging your ass and hysteria without answering the second. This is a sure sign that you are a common liar.
                  1. The eye of the crying
                    The eye of the crying 6 September 2020 20: 31 New
                    -2
                    Quote: IS-80_RVGK2

                    There were two questions. But you answered, if it can only be called an answer to one


                    You are lying. I answered all your questions.
                    1. IS-80_RVGK2
                      IS-80_RVGK2 6 September 2020 20: 34 New
                      -2
                      Quote: Eye of the Crying
                      You are lying. I answered all your questions.

                      No, not a sign-quality answer. Stop lying.
                      1. The eye of the crying
                        The eye of the crying 6 September 2020 20: 35 New
                        -2
                        You just didn't like the answers. But that's your problem.
                      2. IS-80_RVGK2
                        IS-80_RVGK2 6 September 2020 21: 27 New
                        -2
                        Quote: Eye of the Crying
                        You just didn't like the answers. But that's your problem.

                        I see you can’t help but lie to zmagar. But that's your problem. As well as your claims against Russia. We are not interested in your howls.
                      3. The eye of the crying
                        The eye of the crying 6 September 2020 21: 27 New
                        +1
                        Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                        As well as your claims against Russia.


                        I have no complaints about Russia. You're delusional again.
                      4. IS-80_RVGK2
                        IS-80_RVGK2 6 September 2020 21: 35 New
                        -3
                        Turned on the back? Well done. Good sense of self-preservation.
                      5. The eye of the crying
                        The eye of the crying 6 September 2020 21: 35 New
                        0
                        You're hallucinating again.
                      6. IS-80_RVGK2
                        IS-80_RVGK2 6 September 2020 21: 37 New
                        -2
                        Don't confuse your hallucinations with mine.
                      7. The eye of the crying
                        The eye of the crying 6 September 2020 21: 38 New
                        0
                        I am glad that you are aware of your hallucinations. Don't confuse them with reality.
  • Revival
    Revival 7 September 2020 01: 52 New
    +2
    Well, if you say that the people have chosen, then what is your business with ...
    The people have the right to choose whatever they want and then they will disentangle it themselves, their own choice, themselves
  • Dart2027
    Dart2027 6 September 2020 17: 42 New
    -5
    Quote: TerribleGMO
    between a friendly people and a friendly regime

    Do you speak for the whole people?
  • saygon66
    saygon66 6 September 2020 16: 42 New
    +4
    - To answer this question, you need to figure out what Russia can offer its neighbors, and what it can get in return ... except for brotherly love, of course ...
    - What do we not have that they have? Developed economy? It is doubtful ... Human resources - theirs are sitting without earnings ... Natural resources - to master their own ... Oh! Bourgeois! We have enough of this stuff! We can borrow any amount painlessly! But will they take it?
    - And more - nothing ... We are not attractive in any form. And under the kings only misfortune or strength united - so there are no kings ... request
    1. Same lech
      Same lech 6 September 2020 16: 54 New
      0
      - To answer this question, you need to figure out what Russia can offer its neighbors, and what it can get in return ... except for brotherly love, of course ...

      In the USSR there was internationalism and friendship of peoples ... now it will not work.
      1. saygon66
        saygon66 6 September 2020 17: 04 New
        +4
        - I have doubts about the friendship of peoples ... as a former resident of one of the Soviet republics ...
      2. victor50
        victor50 6 September 2020 17: 12 New
        +2
        Quote: The same Lech
        - To answer this question, you need to figure out what Russia can offer its neighbors, and what it can get in return ... except for brotherly love, of course ...

        In the USSR there was internationalism and friendship of peoples ... now it will not work.

        The USSR was the bearer of an idea attractive to people - building a communist society, equality and brotherhood, in the first place.
        1. saygon66
          saygon66 6 September 2020 18: 12 New
          0
          - The Union, and earlier the Russian Empire, from which the USSR inherited the national territories, was the dominant object ... both culturally and economically.
          - There were no alternatives for them at that time, and the idea of ​​equality on the basis of property is popular today ...
      3. Humpty
        Humpty 6 September 2020 18: 53 New
        +3
        Quote: The same LYOKHA
        In the USSR there was internationalism and friendship of peoples ... now it will not work.

        It never occurred to you that even under the tsars there were periods of relative internationalism .. The "friendship of peoples" is hardly tied to the economic formation. IMHO in the union, internationalism has always been one-sided.
        1. saygon66
          saygon66 6 September 2020 19: 15 New
          +5
          - It is unlikely that such a thing as "internationalism" could take place in the Empire ... Rather, as it is said "One state, one people, .....". No wonder, probably, the empires were divided inside by territorial (provinces, provinces), and not by nationality ...
          1. Terrible GMO
            Terrible GMO 6 September 2020 19: 40 New
            0
            Quote: saygon66
            No wonder, probably, the empires were divided inside by territorial (provinces, provinces), and not by nationality ...

            Everything would be fine, but in the Republic of Ingushetia the population was divided ..... according to religion. Catholic - Pole, Orthodox - Russian, Jew - Jew wassat (Jew) and so on.
            1. saygon66
              saygon66 6 September 2020 19: 48 New
              +3
              - Nevertheless, it is worth noting that there was no harassment on the basis of religion ... Mosques in St. Petersburg and Moscow, the Hospital Church in Tashkent, synagogues and churches - many are still standing! But if at the everyday level - there could be ... Places of compact residence were - but again: No coercion ... If you do not remember about the "Pale of Settlement".
  • Trapp1st
    Trapp1st 6 September 2020 16: 47 New
    0
    I wonder if anyone has already identified this scarecrow from a photograph?
  • MstislavHrabr
    MstislavHrabr 6 September 2020 16: 55 New
    +2
    Now the Poles live better than we do (I mean the bulk of the country's people) and it is not surprising that even Belarusians are more oriented toward Poland than Russia ... As soon as the situation changes (and this requires the political will of the leadership, first of all), the attitude towards the Russian Federation among the peoples of Belarus, Ukraine and others will also change.
    1. Trapp1st
      Trapp1st 6 September 2020 18: 21 New
      +1
      Poles now live better than us
      To Belarusians, so what? Even if they completely transfer the country under external control, they will still not live like the Poles. They would rather not live even as they do now. There is an example already.
      1. New Year day
        New Year day 6 September 2020 18: 33 New
        +5
        Quote: Trapp1st
        Even if they completely outsource the country ...

        1 question: when creating a union state with Russia, Belarus loses 95% of its sovereignty: foreign policy, a single army, one center of finance, one administration, etc.
        is this not external management?
        1. Trapp1st
          Trapp1st 6 September 2020 19: 02 New
          -2
          is this not external management?
          No, this is a union state, i.e. one state, not a state under external control. The second is that the Belarusians will probably live at the level of the Russians, and at the level of the Poles, they are not threatened in any way.
          1. Terrible GMO
            Terrible GMO 6 September 2020 19: 45 New
            +2
            Quote: Trapp1st
            No, this is a union state

            It's called annexation smile Or a puppet state, call it what you want.
            Or will Russia allow the leadership of this "union" state from Minsk, the Belarusian ruble will be the currency, and the National Bank of the Republic of Belarus will be the main bank? And money will be printed right there.
            1. Trapp1st
              Trapp1st 7 September 2020 10: 12 New
              +1
              It's called annexation
              It's called annexation
              And this is called reunion

              Russia will allow the management of this "union" state from Minsk, the currency will be the Belarusian ruble, and the main bank will be the National Bank of the Republic of Belarus

              There are 85 regions in Russia, thousands of cities in which people of 180 nationalities live, and all of them have one country, one capital, one ruble ... Is that bad?
              1. Terrible GMO
                Terrible GMO 7 September 2020 13: 08 New
                0
                Quote: Trapp1st
                It's called annexation

                Annexia (lat. Annexio, from lat. Annexus - "attached") - forcible accession by the state of all or part of the territory of another state unilaterally.

                So the picture you have given is not it. Illegal invasion of the territory of a sovereign state and the establishment of a puppet government (or at least its change, yes).

                Quote: Trapp1st
                And this is called reunion

                And this is precisely what is called annexation. Falls under all definitions whatever you call it. When the Germans absorbed Austria it was also a "reunification".

                Quote: Trapp1st
                There are 85 regions in Russia, thousands of cities in which people of 180 nationalities live, and all of them have one country, one capital, one ruble ... Is that bad?

                For Russians, no. Only now we are not Russians and we do not want to "join" your such "single" family.
                1. Trapp1st
                  Trapp1st 7 September 2020 13: 13 New
                  0
                  violent accession
                  another state in one-way order.
                  That is why this is not annexation.
                  we are not Russians and we do not want to "join" your "united" family.
                  If you don't want to, it will be easier for us. That we really are, the salvation of a drowning man is the work of the drowning man himself. Now I will pin my colleagues Belarusians, they will be happy to find employment as foreign citizens)).
          2. Overlock
            Overlock 6 September 2020 20: 26 New
            0
            Quote: Trapp1st
            The second is that Belarusians will probably live at the level of Russians

            and they need it, into poverty and international sanctions?
            Poland has a developed economy, while Russia has a so-called transitional one. Last year, one of the most reputable index agencies in the world, FTSE Russell, included Poland in the list of 25 most developed world markets, which include Germany, France, Japan, Australia, and the USA. The decision came into force at the end of September 2018, and today the Polish economy is officially classified as a developed one.
            In December 1999, a policy article by Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin was published, where Portugal was announced as a benchmark for economic development. The plans were for 15 years to catch up with not the most advanced country in Europe in terms of GDP (PPP) per capita. To date, it has failed to catch up with Portugal.
            Where is Portugal and where is Poland?
            1. Dart2027
              Dart2027 6 September 2020 21: 19 New
              0
              Quote: Overlock
              Poland has a developed economy, while Russia has a so-called transitional one.

              And how many subsidies from the Germans Poland receives for its economy?
            2. Trapp1st
              Trapp1st 7 September 2020 10: 15 New
              -1
              Where is Portugal and where is Poland?
              Where is Belarus and where is Poland, and who needs Belarus in Poland? From an economic point of view, I doubt that Russia also needs Belarus, but we do not measure everything with money, but the Poles do.
  • vavilon
    vavilon 6 September 2020 16: 58 New
    +4
    If our dear Putin does not change the system of oligarchs, which is not interested in uniting from the former Soviet republics, they have one goal, this is profit and the consumer and everything else does not interest them, then sooner or later he will be replaced with them.
    Well, very often in this Chaos of system changes, people come to power who further ruin the country and Ukraine is an example of this when the revolution was made against the oligarchs and ultimately got a criminal oligarchy
    1. IS-80_RVGK2
      IS-80_RVGK2 6 September 2020 17: 43 New
      +3
      Are you sure that those who are at the helm of the economy of Belarus want to unite? Or do you think that all this porridge was brewed without their participation?
      1. New Year day
        New Year day 6 September 2020 18: 20 New
        +6
        Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
        Are you sure that those who are at the helm of the economy of Belarus want to unite?

        who was by whom should become ничем? laughing The answer is obvious
        1. IS-80_RVGK2
          IS-80_RVGK2 6 September 2020 20: 02 New
          0
          Yeah, just like we have Roma Abramovich.
      2. vavilon
        vavilon 6 September 2020 20: 03 New
        +4
        The problem is not in Belarus, but the problem in Russia, or rather in its system
        Have you ever wondered why, if you look at the Russian media, the mass of information is all around us bad and we are good? Or maybe you need to ask yourself why something is happening, we are doing wrong in relation to the former Soviet republics.
    2. ivymotek
      ivymotek 6 September 2020 18: 38 New
      -1
      Ukraine is chronically unlucky with leaders as well as Russia itself, but in Ukraine they are still replaceable, but in Russia they are not. It is not known how Russia would have lived in the XNUMXs, if then the golden fountain of dollars from under the ground had not erupted .... Not everyone passes the test of power and money. No one is the president, no friends of the president, oligarchs can be above the law. In a country where there is no competition for power, there can be no worthy power.
      1. vavilon
        vavilon 6 September 2020 19: 57 New
        +3
        In Nutri systems, faces can change endlessly, and all this political fuss before elections in the West is just a performance in front of a lot of people.
        As they say for whom I do not vote, you will still get a "donut hole"
        And if candidates appear who pose a threat to this system, they are ruthlessly destroyed. And an example for you in France, Strauss-Kahn or the same Fillon who was sentenced to a real term
  • Mishanya 74
    Mishanya 74 6 September 2020 17: 02 New
    0
    Came to their senses ..
  • Xenofont
    Xenofont 6 September 2020 17: 02 New
    +5
    Time is hopelessly lost, because for 30 years our rulers have been exclusively protecting business interests to the detriment of everything else. And as a result, can the people feel confident on 10 tons of pension or salary? What can we say about the protection of the "Russian World" and other humanitarian ideas that can rally people. Beggars are easy to manipulate because their only goal is to survive.
    1. IS-80_RVGK2
      IS-80_RVGK2 6 September 2020 17: 55 New
      +5
      Thirty years stupidly sawing loot from which the majority got crumbs. And now everything is going downhill on the sly, especially under the influence of the coronavirus. And now the agents of the State Department and Lukashenka are suddenly to blame for what happened in Belarus, and our shitty effective managers of the type have nothing to do with it. Instead of creating a strong economy to raise the standard of living to decent values, they created all this shit with the middle class with incomes of 17 thousand, yachts for a billion and other binges in Courchevel and squandering money. Yes, if these scum even a little bit about their people thought this would be the situation, even it would be in our hands. The people of Belarus would not have waved salo-flags and demanded a standard of living as in Europe, but would have shouted about unification and waved the white-red-blue flag. But these only danced round dances with a multi-vector and for the fifth time assured each other of the construction of a chimera of the union state. And they sponsored their own defeat in Belarus at our expense. Fucking scum.
  • victor50
    victor50 6 September 2020 17: 10 New
    +2
    "It will be extremely difficult to achieve greater attractiveness than the West, not only for the elites, but for the society of post-Soviet countries as a whole, but it is necessary to strive for this."
    Honesty and truthfulness in everything that is so lacking not only in our country, in the whole world. The first country to understand the value of these principles and begin to implement them will begin to attract peoples to itself.
  • Viktor Sergeev
    Viktor Sergeev 6 September 2020 17: 27 New
    -3
    Why do we need trust? To feed the ungrateful rogues again? Business and nothing personal.
  • Sibguest
    Sibguest 6 September 2020 17: 42 New
    +4
    Hello everyone .
    To begin with, a small comment: I was not too lazy to search the Web for data on this m ... duck in the photo.
    This photo was taken on March 25, 2015 at the Zmagar event in honor of the so-called Freedom Day. It depicts the co-chairman of the Nazi group Young Front, Eduard Lobov. Soon after this action, he left for Ukraine and joined the ranks of the Azov battalion. In the photos on the Vkontakte social network https://vk.com/id91075958 this leader of the “Belarusian opposition” proudly poses both against the background of Ukronazi symbols and in a helmet with SS runes.
    *
    In essence, the article: the answer to the question (of the author) suggests itself - WHY DO WE GET THE CONFIDENCE OF THOSE WHO SMILING IN THE EYES (GIVE MONEY!) SPITS IN US IN THE BACK OR OPEN WANTS TO TAKE US "ON PRESS"?
    Let all these former Soviet republics go to ... right or left, in general - their own way.
    And we - RUSSIA - went and will go our own way.
    1. The eye of the crying
      The eye of the crying 6 September 2020 18: 14 New
      +6
      Quote: Sibguest
      this leader of the "Belarusian opposition"


      It's strange, you seem to have written yourself that he even left Belarus. Did he come back and even become a leader?

      By the way, Natsiks from many countries entered Azov. Including - from Russia.
      1. Sibguest
        Sibguest 7 September 2020 11: 31 New
        +1
        Have you read carefully?
        Again: This photo was taken on March 25, 2015.
        The author of the article just stuck what he found.
        1. The eye of the crying
          The eye of the crying 7 September 2020 11: 33 New
          0
          Quote: Sibguest
          Have you read carefully?


          Yes. The author stuck a photo that fits his idea, but for some reason you called this character the leader of the Belarusian opposition.
    2. New Year day
      New Year day 6 September 2020 18: 26 New
      11
      Quote: Sibguest
      And we - RUSSIA - went and will go our own way.

      it's certainly good to go your own way. But where?
      From the last, vital:
      "In August of this year, the FSB border service in the Murmansk region outlawed any operations with fish in the sea for coastal fishermen. Cleaning and evisceration were banned, without which the catch cannot be delivered to the shore fresh, since the fishing trip of a coastal vessel lasts several days. ...

      State technical regulations prescribe to process the caught fish as soon as possible in order to prevent spoilage of the product, but the FSB considered the processed fish "ready-to-eat". It is impossible to produce such products on coastal vessels under the threat of a fine of 300% of the value of the catch. laughing

      The fishermen said that if the FSB does not withdraw its demands by September 20, no applications for quotas will be submitted this fall and fishing will be stopped. request
      1. Sibguest
        Sibguest 7 September 2020 11: 34 New
        +1
        The question is "where?" judging by the other comments, it was only you?
        Having lived a quarter of a century in my patronymic - the USSR, I know where to go.
  • Azis
    Azis 6 September 2020 17: 48 New
    +6
    I do not think that Russia, with the current "elites" who have eaten their ear, can win someone's trust (except for temporary partners in the destruction of everything and everyone). The saying "Let the goat into the garden" is about them. In addition, it should be taken into account that over 30 years the republics have developed their own, similar "elites", who, too, absolutely do not want to share with anyone or even lose their feeding trough. And in the same way they are devouring their country and looking for somewhere to dump, to digest what they eat.
  • Oleg Skvortsov
    Oleg Skvortsov 6 September 2020 18: 12 New
    +3
    Sorry, what the hell is Russia to gain someone's trust? Russia should be a self-sufficient, imperial country - economically and intellectually developed above all. To my side, how are Kazakhs or Armenians with Tajiks living in their villages and auls. The state of the Russian Federation must first of all take care of its people and their well-being. All the more, I don't care whether a Georgian trusts me or not) There should only be economic interests and partnership, business. I don’t remember about Ukraine at all - who stayed there - it means that they are happy with everything - everyone should be responsible for himself. Still, in Russia, traitors to national interests from the political "elite" should be cleaned out, but so far the guts are thin
    1. Azis
      Azis 6 September 2020 18: 28 New
      -1
      Quote: Oleg Skvortsov
      who stayed there means they are happy with everything
      Not everyone has the opportunity to leave, not just to another region, but to another state. AND
      Kazakhs or Armenians with Tajiks
      the same people, with all the positive and negative traits.
      in Russia to cleanse traitors to national interests from the political "elite"
      not only political, economic too, although today it is so intertwined.
  • BAI
    BAI 6 September 2020 19: 38 New
    0
    Need money. All post-Soviet states are looking for whom it is more profitable to sell. Who pays - so the girl.
  • Aleks2000
    Aleks2000 6 September 2020 19: 45 New
    +2
    You do not.

    Since the elite will try not to let someone else in. So nationalists are being purposefully raised. After all, Gazprom will buy everything

    Moreover, our banks, oligarchs also support strangers and their own nationalists. (including in Ukraine it was)
    They really want to disperse everyone in the corners and trenches.
  • Igor Litvin
    Igor Litvin 6 September 2020 20: 05 New
    +3
    1) Well, the patriarch could at one time declare that he condemns the intervention in Ukraine - they would have remained in the same church.
    2) Well, Putin could have declared that he recognizes only fair elections - people would walk around Minsk with Russian tricolors, and that would be sincere.
    Trust can only be restored by truth, for there is strength in it. No matter how pretentious this common truth sounds.
  • German Titov
    German Titov 6 September 2020 20: 17 New
    0
    "Maskaley is definitely on" profit "! Come to Donetsk. You will not have time to" get used to ", Man Morally Omitted. Guy Especially Valuable
  • tech3030
    tech3030 6 September 2020 20: 18 New
    0
    I hope the subject in the photo is brought to the right place ?!
  • ibirus
    ibirus 6 September 2020 20: 37 New
    +1
    The trust of the former republics is not needed. It's important to focus on yourself. Spend all resources only on yourself, your country and your people. Build relationships with neighbors exclusively on mutually beneficial positions. Forget this idiotic mantra about fraternal peoples. All fraternal peoples live only in the Russian Federation, neighbors live abroad. Point.
  • uranium
    uranium 6 September 2020 20: 55 New
    +1
    having serious territorial claims and actively supported by Turkey (and not only by it) Azerbaijan, Yerevan is extremely dependent on military-technical cooperation with Russia.
    Armenia occupied Karabakh and 7 regions of Azerbaijan. Armenia declares territorial claims against Turkey, Azerbaijan and Georgia.
  • nikvic46
    nikvic46 6 September 2020 21: 13 New
    +1
    Recently A. Gradskiy expressed something like this - Unas there are many smart people. But it seems that it is unprofitable for them to teach young people so that they ask a lot of questions. Even the left will not find a unified position, and the right is not at all interested in young people looking at the root of life. questions. As one critic said, they study higher physics, but at home they can't fix a socket. We have a lot of school dropouts. It is clear what kind of movies they are watching. There is nothing to say about reading. And many of these guys have become adults. And they will have children ...
  • sniperino
    sniperino 6 September 2020 21: 56 New
    0
    How Russia can win the trust of the former Soviet republics
    Trust should not be gained by "seizing the enemy's initiative," but earned. The metaphor of conquest works better with women's hearts than with the brains of potential partners, on which it has a direct opposite effect.
    We will continue to wait for the last line, then to save the situation with the most desperate measures, up to the promise of military assistance
    If a calm, but firm confirmation of the readiness to fulfill the obligations undertaken earlier, which, in fact, deserves trust, for the author looks like "the most desperate measure" and "the last line", then for me the statement about the need to make "huge investments, which requires sensible, professional and systemic propaganda "begins to look like lobbying for the author's personal or corporate interests and does not inspire confidence.
    Japanese cars, for example, inspire confidence among motorists, not because two Japanese people knock on everyone's door once a week with a catalog and offer to "talk about a Japanese car", and not because their firms or the government bribe "integrate into joint projects" of our officials.
    We need to develop science, production, form the internal market, eliminate corruption, strengthen the Armed Forces and fulfill our obligations. And we will have a well-deserved trust.
  • gvozdan
    gvozdan 6 September 2020 22: 48 New
    +1
    We do not need these republics as it turned out. The best way to reason with the kids is to stop giving them money, otherwise they think a lot about themselves. Will go crazy.
  • Revival
    Revival 7 September 2020 00: 18 New
    +2
    We have nothing to offer them!
    There is nothing!
    Standard of living?
    A picture of the prosperity of the people?
    Success in leading areas?
    Legality and fairness?
    What!?
    1. hhhhhhh
      hhhhhhh 8 September 2020 09: 00 New
      0
      Quote: Revival
      We have nothing to offer them!
      There is nothing!
      Standard of living?
      A picture of the prosperity of the people?
      Success in leading areas?
      Legality and fairness?
      What!?

      Of course, there are crybies around like you.)))
      1. Revival
        Revival 8 September 2020 09: 13 New
        0
        And in essence, not stupidity, is there anything to say?
        Although, I will not demand the impossible from you ...
        1. hhhhhhh
          hhhhhhh 8 September 2020 09: 15 New
          +1
          Have you been to the EU? Did you talk to local Germans, Italians, French? Not near the sights, but where most of the common people live.
  • Valtimchenko
    Valtimchenko 7 September 2020 01: 05 New
    +3
    What for? That is why we, Russians, Armenia, Georgia, different limitrophes? What is their value in order to spend money on them again?
    About brazzkonorotnost it is not necessary to fill in. Nits with the memory of guppies, pulling carnations across borders and various other Natsiks smiling in the face and then spitting in the back (and in some places at the time of collapse, and different-sharp) are not my brothers personally. And I'm not going to give them money out of my pocket.
    They are not of strategic importance (Belarus, by the way, too).

    I sincerely hope that as the power of internazis and other communist women in Russia ended 30 years ago, it will no longer be here. And their ideas about feeding any ungrateful bastard will sink into oblivion. And, for once and for all, a healthy cynicism and neo-colonial attitude towards inadequate neighbors will prevail in Russia in, as they wrote here, "underbelly".

    If they want money, let them do what they are told to do, and on a purely commercial basis, without kissing hard. No - for a hungry ration and wait until they want to eat. The main thing is to close the border so that they don't come running here like cockroaches.
    Does someone want to take them on balance? - forward and with a song.
  • Alex66
    Alex66 7 September 2020 06: 56 New
    +1
    It will be extremely difficult to achieve greater attractiveness than the West, not only for the elites, but also for the society of post-Soviet countries in general.
    But what makes the West so attractive? the standard of living, raise the standard of living and our neighbors will want to join us, but for now they choose where it is better, which means that no matter what the words of Peskov, Solovyov, Skabeeva, we are still worse off.
  • EvilLion
    EvilLion 7 September 2020 08: 32 New
    0
    We do not need their trust, the West promises them more anyway, because it does not plan to give what was promised. The main thing is to understand that without Russia they are crazy. Feed only those who want to go to Russia.
    1. hhhhhhh
      hhhhhhh 8 September 2020 09: 19 New
      0
      Quote: EvilLion
      Feed only those who want to go to Russia.

      When will they move to Russia
  • Igor Litvin
    Igor Litvin 7 September 2020 09: 00 New
    0
    Quote: tech3030
    I hope the subject in the photo is brought to the right place ?!

    1) judging by warm clothes - photos from long-standing rallies organized by the regular opposition. The present rallies are the people.
    2) either it is a provocateur, or who has sat out in computer games