Military Review

Su-35s are tested for combat use.

30

Flight tests with real combat use of the Su-35S multifunctional super-maneuverable fighter are currently being conducted as part of the state joint tests (GSI) at the State Flight Test Center of the Russian Air Force. The obtained technical and accuracy characteristics of sight-and-aiming systems and combat use modes basically correspond to the declared technical task, the press service of the Sukhoy Company OJSC reports.

During the GSI, a significant volume of flights was performed to assess the flight technical characteristics, strength, stability and controllability, the power plant and the on-board equipment complex. Important ground and flight tests were carried out to verify the functioning of the information management system, communications complex, navigation, and the radar system. At the stands of the Sukhoi Design Bureau and subcontractors, active work is underway to conduct ground tests of the systems and systems of the aircraft.

Total flight test program performed more than 650 flights.

Su-35 - deeply upgraded super-maneuverable multi-generation fighter "4 ++". It uses the technology of the fifth generation, providing superiority over fighters of a similar class. The distinctive features of the aircraft are the new avionics complex based on a digital information control system, an integrated on-board equipment system, a new radar station with a phased antenna array with a large range of airborne targets with an increased number of simultaneously followed and fired targets and swivel vector thrust.
Originator:
http://www.aex.ru
30 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Alexander Romanov
    Alexander Romanov 8 August 2012 11: 36
    +6
    Real combat use ???? Who is bombing this week?
    1. click80
      click80 8 August 2012 11: 41
      +1
      no matter how sad it sounds most likely the target request
      1. VAF
        VAF 8 August 2012 13: 41
        +3
        Quote: click80
        no matter how sad it sounds most likely the target


        And what do you suggest, on GOS = ah and immediately on the real ones?

        This is not practiced, but at the stage of military trials, yes ... drinks
        An example .... the use of Su-34 in the August database! good

        In the meantime .. only on target at the landfills .... and this is quite normal!



        Su-35S board number 01 is blue with 4 R-73 missiles and one FAB-100 class bomb under the fuselage. Airfield LII Air Force in Ramenskoye, May 2012
    2. Skiff
      Skiff 8 August 2012 11: 51
      +2
      Yes, I also didn’t understand what combat use ???
      1. VAF
        VAF 8 August 2012 13: 51
        +1
        Quote: Skiff
        Yes, I also didn’t understand what combat use ???


        Aircraft is essentially a complex, i.e. a platform with equipment and weapons, so any component must pass its stage of testing, from design-mock-up bench to flying. +! soldier

        Therefore, at this stage, the GSI process is underway, both for separate weapons, on other carriers ...



        Su-35BM, board No. 901, with missiles of the R-77 type and missiles of the R-73 type. Airfield LII Air Force in Ramenskoye, May 2012

        So directly on that type of aircraft, i.e. on the Su-35S, for which this weapon was created.

    3. Aleks23
      Aleks23 8 August 2012 12: 15
      -6
      in August the eighth, bombed Georgian air defense
      1. leon-iv
        leon-iv 8 August 2012 12: 22
        +5
        Do not smash her nonsense it hurts rodent air defense crushed Mi-8 and Su-34
    4. VAF
      VAF 8 August 2012 13: 35
      +2
      Quote: Alexander Romanov
      Real combat use ???? Who is bombing this week?


      Sanya, welcome, +! Well, here everything is in order, even more than, because The ICG were on the plan for 2013, and you see how much they moved ... it's a lot of progress!

      Only now, it’s time for the author to get rid of the Su-35BM pictures, because there’s a conversation in the article about the Su-35C (that is, the modernization of BM is already the second generation!).



      The first production Su-35 of the second generation - Su-35S board number 01 is black. State tests, Ramenskoye, first half of July 2012
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 8 August 2012 13: 38
        +3
        Sergey greetings and with AMNESTY good
        1. VAF
          VAF 8 August 2012 14: 54
          +1
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Sergey greetings


          Sanya is great, +! Only not with an amnesty, but with ... with the return, or something ... recourse


          1. Vadivak
            Vadivak 8 August 2012 18: 05
            +2
            Quote: vaf
            Only not with an amnesty, but with ... with the return, or something ..


            Well really software junk?
            1. VAF
              VAF 8 August 2012 22: 26
              0
              Quote: Vadivak
              Well really software junk?


              Vadim, greetings, +! if you're talking about that .. early case, then yes .... "junk", reinstalled completely!

              After all, some promised and hack and burn, etc. etc., blow up there, I will not list .... and now, it seems, nothing, on a new one!
      2. leon-iv
        leon-iv 8 August 2012 13: 52
        +1
        VAF
        Which board do you think is best to make a separate EW plane
        1. VAF
          VAF 8 August 2012 15: 02
          +1
          Quote: leon-iv
          Which board do you think is best to make a separate EW plane


          For IA and FBA, in principle, he was already yes and there .. just change the stuffing ... Su-24MP!



          Although the Guide has a different opinion on this matter ... request

          In the section "Sale of property" on June 20 of this year, an information message was published on the sale of scrap of ferrous and non-ferrous metals, the source of the formation of which are 24 uncut gliders of front-line Su-33 bombers in the amount of 17 pieces. The location of 4,8 gliders is indicated at the Lebyazhye airfield, located in the Volgograd region, and sixteen more - at the Yeisk airfield in the Krasnodar Territory. The initial price of the former is set at 4,5 million rubles, and for the Yeisk ones - at 6 million rubles. The results of the auction will be announced on August XNUMX.

          Apparently, the planes being sold were decommissioned in the course of bringing the Air Force to a "new" look, when 1 bomber aviation regiment from Lebyazhye and 959 baptists from Yeisk, which operated the "classic" Su-24, were disbanded. As you know, during the reform of the Air Force, the backbone of the bomber aviation was made up of more modern Su-24M aircraft, including their modernized versions of the Su-24M2 under the Sukhoi holding program and the Su-24, which were revised according to the Metronome design and development project developed by Gefest CJSC and T ". Older Su-24s remained only in the Black Sea Fleet airbase, based in the Crimea, and, according to some sources, in the Air Force air group in Morozovsk.


          It is worth noting that this auction is the first auction to sell decommissioned aircraft after the Air Force reform began in 2009.
          1. VAF
            VAF 8 August 2012 15: 12
            +1
            And for long aircraft, only the Tu-22M3 ... there is no one else .....



            It's still better than "using" like this .....

  2. Eugene
    Eugene 8 August 2012 11: 36
    +1
    The question is, why did they decide to abandon the PGO, although they initially extolled it as an advantage despite the presence of engines with high-voltage gear?
    1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
      Andrei from Chelyabinsk 8 August 2012 11: 38
      +3
      For maneuverability - definitely an advantage, but fonit on the radar. So then came up with a way to do without it. Although there would not prevent the opinion of the pros to find out
      1. VAF
        VAF 8 August 2012 14: 05
        +2
        Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
        For maneuverability - definitely an advantage, but fonit on the radar. So then they came up with a way to do without it.


        Andrew, welcome, +! A little, very little, but not true ....

        PGOs were set due to the fact that new equipment and changes in the airframe violated the original alignment, the aircraft became too stable and a controlled destabilizer had to be installed.




        New cars come with normal centering and self-propelled guns optimized for it.

        1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
          Andrei from Chelyabinsk 8 August 2012 17: 42
          +2
          Thank you very much, I did not know!
          drinks
        2. 11Goor11
          11Goor11 8 August 2012 20: 24
          +1
          Sergey, what do you think about this, how true is it:
          http://vpk.name/news/73355_molodyie_letchiki_begut_iz_vvs.html
          "Pilots refuse to serve in combat units, preferring civilian airlines
          Due to the imperfection of the payroll system, the Russian Air Force began to lose young personnel. A source in the Air Force told Izvestia that out of 80 young pilots who entered the Air Force combat units last year, almost 60 have already begun the procedure of dismissal, without having served in the army for a year. If the situation does not change, by 2015 the army will have lost almost 70% of combat pilots.

          The pilots themselves explain that they were deceived with money and deprived of the opportunity to fly.

          - Last year, when we graduated, we were promised that from January 1, 2012 we will receive 100 thousand rubles each. In reality, they received about 60 thousand rubles. And now we have also changed the flight rate: now, if we do not fly 100 hours, we will receive 37 thousand in our hands. I’d better go to Aeroflot, ”the pilot of the Su-25, who is now passing the air flight commission before dismissal.

          He explained that 70% of a combat pilot's salary is a bonus "for special conditions of service" and a bonus "for the conscientious and effective performance of official duties." They are credited only to those who have fulfilled the established norm of flying hours per year. And from January 1, 2012, this norm was 100 hours per year for front-line aviation pilots. This is exactly how much it is necessary to spend in the air for everyone who flies on combat "dryers" and "MiGs" - Su-27, MiG-29, MiG-31, etc.

          At the same time, if it is not difficult to meet the norm for pilots of transport aircraft carrying out 2-3 hours in one flight (for IL-76, Tu-154 and other transport planes, the norm is 140-150 hours, this is 50-60 flights), then for pilots - fighters who spend in the air only 20-30 minutes per flight to fly 100 hours need to make 200 sorties.

          - Even if you count by the hour a day, it needs to fly 100 days a year. But nobody lets us fly so often, ”the lieutenant admitted.

          The commander of one of the long-range bombers' squadrons explained to Izvestia that it had been the practice to keep youngsters out of the Air Force since the difficult 1990s, when there was not enough fuel and serviceable aircraft (often the regiment had no more than 2-3 serviceable aircraft). Now, due to the shortage of young people, the aces are earning money "
          1. VAF
            VAF 8 August 2012 22: 38
            +1
            Quote: 11Goor11
            Sergey, what do you think about this, how true is it:


            When this new order was issued to increase the raid standards for the flight personnel of the Air Force aviation, we discussed this topic in detail, where I immediately said that they are, firstly, simply not feasible for many types, because. Remember the speeches of our superiors who rejoiced. that we now have almost a triple supply of pilots ???
            so of course, to disperse as many regiments, to fire so many, but still there was a lot left, and even then I said that it would be ... trouble, well, all the more so. when the order and concretization of the allowances came out, it became immediately clear what would happen .. .hat.

            For what I got ... well, you read what nicknames!

            This is what place you had to think about. What would practically level the raids of strategists and transporters with fighters and helicopters ???

            Therefore, the day before yesterday, I posted two pictures of the Su-27UB pairs that went to the factory because they knocked out the entire resource, but the next pair was the same ... it crashed accidentally in Chelyabinsk due to engine failure, because the equipment is not iron.

            So according to the logic of things, everything happens as it should happen, this is the technical side of the issue.

            Well, moral ... we did not have this, in the first Chechen so at all ... 5 months did not pay, it is true that they returned everything, but ... the families ate what they gave in stores on record, Well, we .... I will not tell ... but no one was going to quit ..... then we ourselves ..... in a "voluntary-compulsory" order .... reformed!

            I wrote the same thing about it!

            Here, in principle, as it is ...... but further ... it will only get worse, because. the old people will still quit, but there is no youth!

            Well, I already wrote about this!
  3. tronin.maxim
    tronin.maxim 8 August 2012 11: 43
    0
    Now many countries envy us, especially the USA and China! The United States because its exterminator really doesn’t work, and China is thirsty to buy a plane! (Well, China has rolled its lip, sell it, sell it! As we arm our parts, so maybe we will think about selling!) smile
    1. tronin.maxim
      tronin.maxim 8 August 2012 11: 45
      +1
      Wait another t-50 finish and in general good fellow soldier
    2. pribolt
      pribolt 8 August 2012 12: 13
      +1
      Venezuela also wants to buy SU 35, and the Chinese will have at least 200 pieces and go ahead, otherwise they will sell 2 and they will save.
      1. tronin.maxim
        tronin.maxim 8 August 2012 13: 22
        +1
        One hell how many do not sell 1 or 100 will make a complete copy!
        1. patsantre
          patsantre 8 August 2012 13: 52
          0
          So you calculate how much profit and profit we have from two, and how many from two hundred.
          1. Alexander Romanov
            Alexander Romanov 8 August 2012 13: 55
            +3
            Quote: patsantre

            So you calculate how much profit and profit we have from two, and how many from two hundred.

            And you will need money, if in the case of warriors we will not have 35 SU, but only the loot from their sale, you see, and our managers think primarily about money.
  4. with
    with 8 August 2012 12: 16
    +9
    “The State Department has no methods against Kostya Saprykin!”))) bully
  5. red 015
    red 015 8 August 2012 12: 22
    +1
    handsome !!!
  6. Horde
    Horde 8 August 2012 12: 49
    0
    I wonder who gave him so many advantages and what does this mean?
  7. 6o6er
    6o6er 8 August 2012 12: 56
    0
    By flight tests with real combat use, most likely we mean flights to Akhtubinsk at the training ground.
  8. damba
    damba 8 August 2012 13: 28
    0
    As far as I know, until the 15th year there will be 48 fighters, after which 48 more will be purchased. The serial purchase itself will be from the 13th, which means that it’s so bad
    8 units-13 16 units-12 and 24 units-15th year. The question is it turns out that from a period of 16 to 20, the speed of construction will be reduced
    1. patsantre
      patsantre 8 August 2012 13: 53
      0
      Why infa that after 2015 they want only 48?
  9. Delink
    Delink 8 August 2012 14: 06
    0
    With such an 18km ceiling, it was possible to try real targets with homing missiles. For example, the Georgian fleet, for starters.
  10. Hey
    Hey 8 August 2012 15: 22
    +2
    The plane is handsome. Only who will fly them and other planes? I read about how young pilots are being pressured, from which they leave for civilian life. (http://vpk.name/news/73355_molodyie_letchiki_begut_iz_vvs.html).
    I am familiar with such methods not by hearsay.
    There is one task of saving money. And the defenses of nevermind.
    It is a pity that young people want to fly and serve.
    When will these insatiable faces strangle them from this uncontrollable greed for money?