August 22 - Day of the state flag of the Russian Federation

103

For the first time in modern stories the tricolor Russian flag was raised as a state symbol on August 22, 1991. In this capacity, he came to replace the red banner with the hammer and sickle.

But our tricolor appeared much earlier than the Russian Federation was proclaimed and even than its predecessor, the Soviet Union, was founded. The author of the white-blue-red banner was the Russian emperor Peter I. Back in January 1705, he issued an imperial decree, according to which all civilian seagoing ships were required to raise the tricolor flag. The sovereign personally made a sketch, establishing the arrangement of flowers, which has already become familiar to us. There are many versions of why Peter the Great chose this particular color, but it is not known exactly what meaning the emperor put into one of the main state symbols of the country.



Actually, it was used in Russia even before the imperial decree was issued. Back in 1693, the tricolor, which was then called the "flag of the Tsar of Moscow", was first raised on the yacht "St. Peter". On board, Peter the Great sailed along with a group of warships in the White Sea. It is this panel that is considered the oldest Russian flag. Now it is kept in the Central Naval Museum of St. Petersburg.

There are several interpretations of the colors of the state flag of the Russian Federation. One of them claims that white symbolizes freedom, blue - the patroness of Russia, the Mother of God, and red - statehood. According to another version, white means nobility, blue means honesty, and red means courage.

There are several more versions, but be that as it may, the tricolor is associated with our Motherland - Russia.

And on this solemn day, the editors of Voenniy Obozreniye congratulate all citizens of the Russian Federation who are not indifferent to the fate of their Fatherland, who respect their flag with respect and pride.

Happy holiday, dear Russians!
103 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +12
    22 August 2020 04: 36
    Happy holiday, dear Russians!
    Wow! It is also necessary to introduce the Day of the State Emblem of the Russian Federation and the Day of the State Anthem of the Russian Federation. And declare them all non-working. Then we will definitely heal!
    In general, to celebrate the state symbols is some kind of perversion, honestly. Absolutely a sucked holiday. Akin to the so-called. Day of National Unity.
    1. +1
      22 August 2020 04: 50

      Happy holiday, dear Russians!
      everything is clear to me ... Under the crossed tricolor and the Andreevsky flag is a framed photograph of the traitor-general Vlasov. On the front side of the obelisk the inscriptions "They know" and "To the participants of the liberation movement of the peoples of Russia 1941-1945" are carved. On the other side there is an inscription: “Russia is ours. The past of Russia is ours. The future of Russia is ours. "
      1. +11
        22 August 2020 05: 26
        Quote: Dead Day
        .Under the crossed tricolor and the Andreevsky flag there is a framed photograph of the traitor-general Vlasov.

        Yes, they are there in the USA, even if they walk on their heads, the main thing is not to allow this ...
        This is a photo from one of the cemeteries in the United States ...
        1. +11
          22 August 2020 08: 49
          Historical importance is assigned based on the most recent significant event. I want to remind you that the tricolor fought against the Red in the last two most terrible wars. In WWII and Civil. These were the most destructive wars in the entire history of Russia. And our grandparents, who defended their country, would clearly not be delighted with the tricolor. The return of the tricolor would be associated with a return to the old defeated regime.

          Our country made the best and most grandiose accomplishments under the Red Flag (the tricolor was opposed to it at that time). All military and labor exploits, space, victories in sports, scientific achievements ... the people have never had such dedication and enthusiasm, and the symbol of this is the Red Flag.
          1. +11
            22 August 2020 09: 13
            Quote: Stas157
            Historical importance is assigned based on the most recent significant event.

            And I want to remind you of this ...

            These are flags over Dudaev's palace ...

            This is in 2008 ...

            This is in 2014 ...
            Quote: Stas157
            All military and labor exploits, space, victories in sports, scientific achievements ... the people have never had such dedication and enthusiasm, and the symbol of this is the Red Flag.

            You know, maximalism speaks in you.
            Do you think that the victories in the Northern War, the wars with Turkey, the repulse of the French aggression in 1812 and the overseas campaign of 1813-14, the Balkan War and many other military conflicts during this period were of little significance for Russia?
            Yes, and labor victories were enough, the development of the Black Sea region, Central Asia, the Far East, what was it worth, at the expense of scientific, do you think that Lomonosov, Mendeleev, Zhukovsky can be deleted from our history, since their achievements were under the tricolor?
            1. +5
              22 August 2020 09: 51
              Quote: svp67
              These are flags over Dudaev's palace ...

              Yes. There was also Georgia, Syria ... But victories in minor regional conflicts cannot be compared with our victory in the worst World War.

              Quote: svp67
              And there were enough labor victories

              Well, more about labor victories? Are there any of them that would have surpassed the Soviet ones?

              Quote: svp67
              Do you think that Lomonosov, Mendeleev, Zhukovsky can erase from our history

              Why do you ascribe to me a gag? Nevertheless, there is no doubt that the flourishing of science took place precisely during the Soviet era. And it is impossible not to reckon with this. And at the time of Lomonosov and Mendeleev, 90% of the population was illiterate.
              1. +3
                22 August 2020 12: 29
                Quote: Stas157
                Are there any of them that would have surpassed the Soviet ones?

                And everything is known in comparison. Do you think that the development of the Black Sea region, the foundation of dozens of cities and villages, the same shipyards ... is it not comparable with what the Soviet people did in the 20th century? Not. This is a huge work and success for its time. And the construction of the Transsib, the largest construction site of its time ...
                Quote: Stas157
                And at the time of Lomonosov and Mendeleev, 90% of the population was illiterate.

                Yeah ... and where did Lomonosov get his knowledge, before he left with a fish train ...
                1. +4
                  22 August 2020 13: 25
                  Quote: svp67
                  Do you think that the development of the Black Sea region, the foundation of dozens of cities and villages, the same shipyards ... is it not comparable with what the Soviet people did in the 20th century? Not

                  Judging by the size of the GDP of the USSR and tsarist Russia, Soviet construction projects were many times larger and more efficient. The main driving force was the enthusiasm of young people working for the public good, not slave forced labor, as it was in tsarist Russia.

                  Quote: svp67
                  Yeah ... and where did Lomonosov get his knowledge, before he left with a fish train

                  There were very few people like Lomonosov. They are exceptions to the general rule of widespread illiteracy. This story is about how not easy it was to get an education in the troubled times of tsarism for an ordinary person. The Soviet education system gave a start in life, without exaggeration, to thousands of outstanding scientists. And made Soviet science the most advanced in the world.
                  1. -3
                    22 August 2020 14: 56
                    Quote: Stas157
                    The main driving force was the enthusiasm of young people working for the public good, not slave forced labor, as it was in tsarist Russia.

                    At some points the question is VERY controversial. It's no secret that many construction projects from the 20s to the mid-50s were carried out, mostly by the hands of prisoners, consider the same slaves ...
                    1. 0
                      22 August 2020 15: 27
                      Happy Holidays to ALL!
                      Yes, many accomplishments were made under the red flag of a country whose history is an integral part of Russia. But today the flag of Russia is the same as it was approved by Peter the Great!
                    2. +1
                      22 August 2020 20: 29
                      When you look at the current masters of life who now rule our country and what they have done with the country in 30 years, you don’t at ease think that with a pick or an ax in a felling area they would be more useful to society than in their current form.
                    3. +1
                      22 August 2020 23: 06
                      Quote: svp67
                      mostly by the hands of prisoners, consider the same slaves ..

                      This is a liberal mantra, the share of prisoners in the country's GDP is less than 1%
            2. +2
              22 August 2020 10: 54
              Quote: svp67
              Quote: Stas157
              Historical importance is assigned based on the most recent significant event.
              And I want to remind you of this ...

              Are you delusional? Dudaev - an achievement? Heroism, yes. But this is a civil war. 08.08. Heroism, yes. But this is practically the same war.
              Do you think that the victories in the Northern War, the wars with Turkey, the repulse of the French aggression in 1812 and the overseas campaign of 1813-14, the Balkan War and many other military conflicts during this period were of little significance for Russia?
              Do you think they happened under the tricolor? Don't fantasize. By the way, what are you defining the battles of Kulikovskaya and Nevskaya, Molody, etc. forgot, they were held under the RED banner of Moscow.
              1. +5
                22 August 2020 12: 31
                Quote: Mavrikiy
                Are you delusional? Dudaev - an achievement? Heroism, yes. But this is a civil war. 08.08.

                Well, then we are raving along with my opponent, he generally cited the Civil War of 1918-1921 as greatness ...
          2. +3
            22 August 2020 10: 58
            Historical importance is assigned based on the most recent significant event.
            ======
            Curious, who decided that?
          3. +1
            22 August 2020 12: 57
            Our country made the best and most grandiose accomplishments under the Red Flag (the tricolor was opposed to it at that time). All military and labor exploits, space, victories in sports, scientific achievements ... the people have never had such dedication and enthusiasm, and the symbol of this is the Red Flag.
            I totally agree. What is the flag of the country, so is the power.
            1. +2
              22 August 2020 14: 56
              Quote: NordUral
              I totally agree. What is the flag of the country, so is the power.

              What power, such is the flag ...
              1. -1
                22 August 2020 15: 15
                I agree that this government will not get any better from a change of place in the response.
              2. 0
                22 August 2020 20: 38
                To understand where the current government is leading the country, it is enough to look at whom they erect monuments to all the Stolypins, Kolchaks and Solzhenitsins, build Yeltsin centers and rename the names of Soviet streets.
      2. +12
        22 August 2020 05: 45
        Why are you talking about this nonsense? The first Peter's merchants went under the trade flag of the Republic of Ingushetia, which contributed to the greatness and prosperity of Russia, and Ushakov, Nakhimov, Senyavin, the brig "Mercury" and the cruiser "Varyag" fought under the Andreevsky flag. Why all the time to attract scum Vlasov to these symbols?
        Well, you will not associate the bastard murderer Chikatilo with the entire USSR?
        1. +2
          22 August 2020 06: 15
          Quote: Varyag_0711
          Why are you talking about this nonsense?

          why "nonsense", these are facts. and note, many of those who fiercely defend the "tricolor", to which "there are several versions" and "several interpretations", or, simply put, no one knows a damn thing, so these same people, just as fiercely hate EBN, which is this flag made the state in 91 ... then either "remove the cross, or put on panties" ... tongue
          1. -12
            22 August 2020 06: 28
            You, Detkastary, are a real traitor-Vlasovite, trying to turn the Russian people against their own past, to tear them away from their roots and from their history. Today we trample the flag of Peter and St. George's ribbon, symbols with a centuries-old history, and tomorrow, even easier, it will be possible to trample the symbols of the USSR, because their age by historical standards is completely ridiculous and there is much less history behind them than behind the symbols of the Russian Empire. For example, that among the Vlasovites were Heroes of the Soviet Union, and holders of the Orders of Lenin and the Red Banner. So these orders, according to your logic, should be cursed and banned. Monuments to Lenin - to demolish, because orders with his image betrayed the Motherland. Oh, yes: Vlasov was a member of the Communist Party and an exemplary communist. So the Communist Party is also banned, as well as all its symbols: after all, it was the communists, according to your logic, they sold their homeland.
          2. -1
            22 August 2020 06: 46
            Grandfather (Grandfather Old)
            why "nonsense", these are facts.
            This is REDDY of a gray mare performed by "dedkistariy".
            and note, many of those who fiercely defend the "tricolor"
            I do not defend the tricolor, I prefer the flag of the USSR, but I do not like it when scoundrels like you mix the state symbol of my country with dirt, whatever it may be and whatever it is called.
            Personally, you remind me of a proverbial pig that finds dirt everywhere.
            1. +1
              22 August 2020 07: 52
              I'm not against cons, but I would just like to know "FOR WHAT"? What did I write that makes everyone so pins and sausages? Or on the site the Vlasovites dug in such numbers?
              1. +1
                22 August 2020 08: 48
                Quote: Varyag_0711
                but I don't like it when scoundrels like you mix the state symbol of my country with dirt, whatever it is and whatever it is called.

                Quote: Varyag_0711
                I'm not against cons, but I would just like to know "FOR WHAT"?

                Tricklolr was accepted as a state only under Kerensky and Yeltsin. Also, under this flag, traitors fought in the Second World War, who, together with the enemies, killed 20 million of our civilians (including my grandfather).

                What our country turned into under this flag (for clarity in pictures):

                Russian empire.


                Russia under Kerensky (tricolor).


                THE USSR.


                Russian Federation (tricolor).


                As long as the rtikolor is state-owned, we are obliged to respect it, but for some reason we don’t want to, nor did it bring anything good to our Motherland. excuse me, there will be no party-dance in my house on this occasion.
              2. -1
                22 August 2020 11: 10
                Quote: Varyag_0711
                I'm not against cons, but I would just like to know "FOR WHAT"? What did I write that makes everyone so pins and sausages? Or on the site the Vlasovites dug in such numbers?

                Have you broken causal relationships? You defend the Vlasov tricolor with foam at your mouth and call your opponents Vlasovites (and they are for the Reds)? fool
                At the same time, they slammed Claudia, spat on Monique, it's a shame. Ah (- 14), I will not survive this. You are rude and pose as a patriot.
                He turned off the computer and went to drink tea. You will come in an hour. Schoolgirl.
                Quote: Varyag_0711
                What did I write that makes everyone so pins and sausages?

                He probably wrote a lie.
              3. -3
                22 August 2020 12: 45
                Of course we dug in. And it is YOU, since you support individuals of the oligarchy of the Russian Federation - the faithful successors of Vlasov's ideas and the three-color towel he uses. And the neovlasovites and the lackeys of the oligarchy of the Russian Federation from the Soviet people will always receive a "minus". Hopefully soon in the form of a bullet or a rope.
              4. -8
                22 August 2020 13: 18
                Quote: Varyag_0711
                Or on the site the Vlasovites dug in in such numbers?

                No, the communists sold the USSR for all sorts of nyashtyaki ...
                In addition, those who do not know the history of Russia do not understand that before the formation of the USSR, the Red Army fought during the civil war under the flag of Soviet Russia, not the Soviet Union ...

                The communists do not like to compare the maps of the Republic of Ingushetia and the USSR, as well as to answer the questions why the communists squandered Russian lands to other "brotherly peoples" of the USSR, why Russia was divided into "autonomous apartments" ...
                Under the Soviet flag, Russia lost a large number of lands in the territories, than it acquired them with the tricolor ...
            2. -3
              22 August 2020 11: 02
              Quote: Varyag_0711
              This is REDDY of a gray mare performed by "dedkistariy".

              No when, no arguments, it is quite possible to bark and spit. This is so European!
              but I don't like it when scoundrels like you mix the state symbol of my country with dirt, whatever it is and whatever it is called.
              Clear. Pure English style. And I care what they did from my country, as it is called.
              Quote: Varyag_0711
              Personally, you remind me of the proverbial pig that finds dirt everywhere
              It turns out that the pig is a useful animal, because it helps the blind to see this dirt. By the way, when will we do the cleaning, how long can you live in the mud? Otherwise we'll get sick. request
          3. -5
            22 August 2020 08: 08
            Quote: Dead Day
            why "nonsense", these are facts

            It is not the fact that is disputed, but your interpretation of the fact.

            Here's the same fact for you: Red flag over Trotsky's grave:

            and now what: NOT to love already ... Red flag? belay

            You never know who will assign something to themselves.

            According to today's Banner, Russia has grown, formed and become the largest Power in the world.

            The Russian Army is serving and going into battle with him today.

            All citizens and the editorial board of VO- Happy Holidays! hi
            1. -6
              22 August 2020 09: 07
              Quote: Olgovich
              and now what: NOT to love already ... Red flag?

              Red flag on Trotsky's grave?
              Let him not forget in the next world who gave him the ice ax.

              Quote: Olgovich
              The Russian Army is serving and going into battle with him today.

              Under what banners do our regiments go:

              1. -6
                22 August 2020 09: 41
                Quote: Boris55
                Under what banners do our regiments go:

                under our:

                Flag of Russia and the Banner of Victory.
                1. -2
                  22 August 2020 09: 47
                  Quote: Olgovich
                  Flag of Russia and the Banner of Victory.

                  In the parade dedicated to the next anniversary of the victory of the Second World War, there should be no place for the banner under which the traitors fought and killed our winners, in whose honor this parade is dedicated. Also blasphemy against the lost, to have this banner in the ranks immortal regiment.

                  Only when the three symbols of the occupation fall (the closed mausoleum, the banner and the two-headed one), Russia will be free.
                  1. -6
                    22 August 2020 10: 09
                    Quote: Boris55
                    In the parade dedicated to the next anniversary of the victory of the Second World War, there should be no place for the banner under which the traitors fought and killed our winners, in whose honor this parade is dedicated. It is also blasphemy against the dead, to have this banner in the ranks of the immortal regiment.


                    The traitor Vlasov (since 1918) and others like him fought under the red banner for much, much more time, have you forgotten? Now what?

                    And yesThe USSR glorified itself The banner of Russia, and IMMEDIATELY after ... WWII (1946) and garbage about ... Vlasov's "flag" to him and never crossed my mind (clickable ::
                    ::


                    And yes, cancel these orders and medals, since they were on Vlasov


                    Or WHERE is your logic?
                    NOBODY tore off the Order of Lenin or the Red Banner just because they were worn by a traitor and traitor


                    2. The banner of Russia must be at the Parade, for it is the successor of the USSR and the keeper of the Victory.

                    Or WHO will defend (defend), preserve and glorify Victory? .... Non-existent country?
                2. 0
                  22 August 2020 11: 21
                  Quote: Olgovich
                  Victory Banner.

                  Is it puffy? It happens. The red flag brought many to a kandrashka. request
                3. -3
                  22 August 2020 12: 59
                  Yes, a disgusting moment of mockery of your masters from the Russian oligarchy over the Victory Banner. But nothing, soon your merchant-Bulkokhrustno-Vlasov flag will go to where it belongs, to the foot of the Mausoleum, along with the flags of other bantustans.
                4. +1
                  22 August 2020 21: 04
                  "Our" power, by its oligarchic nature, is trying to privatize both the Victory and the Victory Banner, but in fact, over the past 30 years, it has given everything the Soviet soldier fought for.
            2. +1
              22 August 2020 11: 19
              Quote: Olgovich
              According to today's Banner, Russia has grown, formed and become the largest Power in the world.
              Rave? fool It was formed under the Rurikovich under the Red Flag. And it grew under it until the Roormanovs. And under it we created the USSR and defeated everyone.
              Quote: Olgovich
              The Russian Army is serving and going into battle with him today.
              What to do, the Americans foisted this. crying
              1. -6
                22 August 2020 12: 34
                Quote: Mavrikiy
                Are you delusional? It was formed under the Rurikovich under the Red Flag. And it grew under it until the Roormanovs. And under it we created the USSR and defeated everyone.

                1. To school, ignoramus: Russia became Russia only under the Romanovs: the country grew from a meager 5 million to almost 2 million km22,5, i.e. on 350% ... Hack it on your forehead, yes.

                2.The USSR existed on the already assembled and mastered Russia.

                3.the most terrible, terrible, unseen never in history, loss of territory, people in its history, Russia suffered from 1917 to 1991: minus 5 million km2 and the Russian cross. Hack it on your forehead, yeah ..
                1. -6
                  22 August 2020 13: 22
                  Quote: Olgovich
                  Quote: Mavrikiy
                  Are you delusional? It was formed under the Rurikovich under the Red Flag. And it grew under it until the Roormanovs. And under it we created the USSR and defeated everyone.

                  1. To school, ignoramus: Russia became Russia only under the Romanovs: the country grew from a meager 5 million to almost 2 million km22,5, i.e. on 350% ... Hack it on your forehead, yes.

                  2.The USSR existed on the already assembled and mastered Russia.

                  3.the most terrible, terrible, unseen never in history, loss of territory, people in its history, Russia suffered from 1917 to 1991: minus 5 million km2 and the Russian cross. Hack it on your forehead, yeah ..

                  Communists (to that illiterate), do not persuade ...
                2. -3
                  22 August 2020 13: 59
                  Quote: Olgovich
                  1. To school, ignoramus: Russia became Russia only under the Romanovs: the country grew from scanty 5 million km2 to almost 22,5 million km2, i.e. by 350%. Hack into your forehead, yeah
                  Go to Europe, find your equal, woodcutter.
                  To school vezha, to the front desk, so that I don't sleep. I know you, Yes... Besides WIKI, what do we read?
                  Since the end of the 1301th century, the Greek word "Rosia / Rusia" has been increasingly used in official documents, especially in the diplomatic correspondence of the Moscow grand dukes and tsars. It, as it were, signified the entry into the international community of not one of the Russian states, of which there were several earlier, but the only legitimate Russian state. It is reported by Rambler. For a long time Russia was called in Western Europe not only Ruthenia, but also Rusia. So, the Galician prince Yuri Lvovich (16-1305), who received the title of king from the Pope in XNUMX, was named, judging by the seal, Regis Rusicus. Since Rusia was read by most Europeans as "Ruzia", ​​from some time they began to add a second "c" to it for greater accuracy. From here, the double "s" passed into the official title of the Russian tsars.
                  However, there could be another source. Back in the 42174190th century, in some Russian writings, under the influence of the Greek reading, the ethnonym "Ross" is found. Further: https://weekend.rambler.ru/read/XNUMX/?utm_content=weekend_media&utm_medium=read_more&utm_source=copylink
                  Yes, we became Russia before the Romanovs. Relax and take it for granted, woodcutter.
                  Not a meager 5 million, but as much as 2 million km5,4, but you did not lie, but you did not tell the whole truth, traditionally in the European way.
                  There were offers of citizenship from the mountain and Circassian princes, and Siberian Khanate recognized itself as a tributary of Moscow (1563). Moscow repelled two blows from the Ottoman Empire and the Crimean Khanate. In 1569, the campaign of the Crimean Turkish army to Astrakhan failed. The Ottoman army was almost completely destroyed. In 1572, in the decisive Battle of Molodi, the Crimean Turkish army was defeated, put to flight and destroyed, despite the great numerical superiority. The strategic consequences of these events were colossal. Moscow opened the way through the Volga to the East and South (Caspian Sea). The annexation of Siberia began.
                  That is, everything has already been done, before you, woodcutter.
                  1. -6
                    22 August 2020 14: 54
                    Quote: Mavrikiy
                    Yes, we became Russia before the Romanovs. Relax and take it for granted, woodcutter.
                    Not a meager 5 million, but as much as 2 million km5,4, but you did not lie, but you did not tell the whole truth, traditionally in the European way.

                    Didn't understand the first time lol

                    Well, ONCE AGAIN: Russia -Before the Romanovs-5 million km2, with them became 22,5 million km2.

                    Those. Russia has grown by THIRTY Frances! \

                    Got it, no? No.
                    1. -1
                      22 August 2020 21: 26
                      And cheerfully crunched a French bun
          4. -1
            22 August 2020 15: 03
            Quote: Dead Day
            here either "remove the cross, or put on panties" ...

            So take off the cross and put on your underwear. People understand that the world is not white or black, it is gray, a little lighter, a little darker ... Is everything in the world black, at least something light in your life?
            EBN has done a lot of troubles and the return of the tricolor can generally be credited to him, when compared with his other affairs.
            To our great regret, people whom we trusted, and this leadership of the CPSU turned out to be weak-willed and incompetent, which instilled the death of the USSR and the discrediting of its flag. With all the achievements of the USSR, but who now wants to return to the general deficit and queues? Well, after all, this was also in the USSR and the further, the more
        2. +1
          22 August 2020 09: 39
          Why are you talking about this nonsense?

          With the flag, everything is fine. Happy anniversary of the GKChP - that's not very good.
        3. -1
          22 August 2020 12: 59
          Under trade RI flag

          You have clearly defined the mercantile essence of this piece of matter.
      3. -3
        22 August 2020 06: 13
        Quote: Dead Day
        Under the crossed tricolor and the Andreevsky flag is a framed photograph of the traitor-general Vlasov.

        In fact, the ROA was full of symbolism. But tying it to the tricolor is at least strange:

        The flag was approved by Peter I in 1720, and the flag is not to blame that the Vlasovites also wore it along with other flags. ROA and the "Russland" division also used the St. Andrew's flag. Well now, and declare it illegal?
        And as battle banners, and on chevrons, the ROA and "Russland" had Andreev's flags. Tricolors remained only in unrealized projects. The only time with a white-blue-red tricolor some anti-partisan battalion came out for a review, and a few days later, in full force, fled to the partisans. The Vlasovites did not like the tricolor. And just for ideological reasons. The overwhelming number of Vlasovites, and almost all of their command staff, are former Red Army men, many of whom fought in civilian war against whites. And the tricolor is one of the most popular White Guard flags, as a result of which it caused rejection among the Vlasovites.
        1. -2
          22 August 2020 08: 53
          Quote: Bashkirkhan
          But tying it to the tricolor is at least strange:

          You will watch the parade of Vlasov in Pskov in 1943 (there is a video on YouTube).




          Quote: Bashkirkhan
          The flag was approved by Peter I in 1720,

          Peter 1 approved it only as a trade flag. He was never a state government under the Romanovs.
          1. 0
            22 August 2020 09: 20
            There is only one photo where these figures are marching under the tricolor. Pskov, June 22, 1943. This is the only recorded case of the use of the white-blue-red flag by the collaborationist militants. Already in November 1943, the soldiers from this photo, having killed the German curators and several especially ideological of their own, went to the partisans with their entire division.
            Let us remember that, say, the saboteurs of "Brandenburg" dressed in the Soviet uniform, the Bandera men wore it. They went to kill with red stars, think!
            And here's another photo fact. The traitor in his real, not masquerade form, wears the Order of the Red Banner. Note: not a drawing depicting an event that never happened, like a false daub with a tricolor at the mausoleum (the fact is easily verified, since the entire parade was filmed and lists of banners thrown to the mausoleum are in the archives), but a photographic fact. So the Soviet orders, according to your logic - down with, as symbols of betrayal and Vlasovism. So?
            1. -5
              22 August 2020 09: 38
              Quote: Bashkirkhan
              Pskov, June 22, 1943

              There are not only photos, but also videos (0:44):



              Pay attention to the cockade:


          2. +4
            22 August 2020 12: 05
            Quote: Boris55
            You will watch the parade of Vlasov in Pskov in 1943 (there is a video on YouTube).

            These are not Vlasovites. This is the ROA Guards Brigade, the Dovlasov ROA. The officers in it were White emigres. So they dressed up with a tricolor.
        2. -3
          22 August 2020 11: 23
          Quote: Bashkirkhan
          the flag is not to blame that its Vlasovites, along with other flags, also wore

          fool Is the swastika to blame that Hitler used it? Prohibited everywhere.
      4. +3
        22 August 2020 07: 06
        Dedcast darling, why are you so)))
        Tricolor is a symbol of our state, for the well-being and prosperity of which we are fighting with the whole world. He is the symbol of our struggle. And there are many of those who have already given their lives under the tricolor in the fight against international terrorism directed against all of us. Let's remember the warrior heroes. And let the winds of history fly our flag over us forever!
        Happy holiday, dear colleagues!
        1. -2
          22 August 2020 11: 25
          No, Lyudmila Yakovlevna, a referendum, not amerov's dictate on a drunken head!
        2. +2
          22 August 2020 13: 05
          Lyudmila Yakovlevna!
          Once again, you amazed me. It's a pity, for me the flag of my Motherland is only red.
          1. +5
            22 August 2020 13: 26
            Dear colleague of Nord Ural, well, for me the flag of my Motherland is red)))
            But I also cannot say that today's Russia is not my Motherland. But the functions are different. That was the real Motherland, and the present one replaces the lost one. And I cannot but reckon with the fact that for two generations of young people today's Russia is their homeland. And they died for her. To think differently is to show disrespect to them. And there it will be like a historical map.
            1. +2
              22 August 2020 13: 50
              An understandable but unacceptable position for me.
              If we leave the Union, the young will finally accept this treacherous and essentially enemy to my Motherland symbolism.
              1. +3
                22 August 2020 13: 55
                Where are the Marxist circles? Where are the new theorists? )))
                You see, I even put an accent in the word "circles", otherwise the young will not understand)))
                1. +1
                  22 August 2020 16: 26
                  Everyone must decide for himself, circles are already the second. The main thing is understanding where and why to direct your thoughts and feet. And we must start with thinking about a possible future. His own, children, grandchildren and ...
    2. -5
      22 August 2020 07: 12
      Quote: Dalny V
      Absolutely a sucked holiday.

      Literally understand! fool
  2. +4
    22 August 2020 05: 09
    The trade flag has become one of the main symbols of the state. What else can I say.
    1. +8
      22 August 2020 10: 37
      Who knew ...
  3. +5
    22 August 2020 05: 40
    Mmmmm ... what
    RF is the legal successor (read "heiress") of the USSR, and for some reason the same symbols are from RI.?.
    what what what
    1. +2
      22 August 2020 07: 36
      Quote: Yves762
      RF is the legal successor (read "heiress") of the USSR, and for some reason the same symbols are from RI.?.

      "Well, they wrapped the fish here, don't read."
  4. +13
    22 August 2020 06: 31
    The Russian tricolor is the flag of the traitor Yeltsin, who destroyed the USSR and turned Russia into a colony of the United States and Britain. The old red flag with hammer and sickle must be returned.
    1. +8
      22 August 2020 07: 34
      Quote: Kot_Kuzya
      The old red flag with hammer and sickle must be returned.

      I agree, because look at the icons, where most of the squads go into battle under the red banner. This is the main thing, and those who are choking with snot in emotion from the Approved tricolor, remembering its "antiquity", should be sent to school and taught history. And then the priests say that the Bible brought the light, and before it they sat in the trees, then they did not have gramata before the KiM, then under the Soviets they ate rubber galoshes. fool Brought, kind people. hi
    2. +2
      22 August 2020 13: 07
      Only one flag?
      1. 0
        22 August 2020 13: 51
        You can start with the flag as well. And then it will be seen.
        1. +1
          22 August 2020 13: 53
          I agree, the main thing is to push the stone from the summit captured by the enemy.
  5. +11
    22 August 2020 06: 42
    On this day, the "democrats" finally won ... EBN, Chubais, others
  6. +6
    22 August 2020 06: 53
    What flag, such is the country. Everything is bought and sold. Interestingly, when, in the fight against de-communization, Soviet stars will be replaced with a three-color circle on VKS aircraft?
    1. 0
      22 August 2020 10: 00
      Quote: Uran53
      What flag, such is the country.

    2. 0
      22 August 2020 18: 50
      Replaced. We have already pushed through the Pepsi-Kolnaya star, and there the "return to the origins" is not far off.
  7. -1
    22 August 2020 07: 01
    vague article ...., oh yes, lost Russia ...., inverted Dutch flag, Byzantine coat of arms ...., another Rome ...., and so on, but holiday, happy holiday !!!!
    1. +2
      22 August 2020 13: 26
      Quote: Iskazi
      indistinct article ...., oh yes, lost Russia ...., inverted Dutch flag, in

      You probably have never seen the Dutch flag, if you write such nonsense ...
      Here Serbs can be said that their flag is an inverted Russian ...
  8. +10
    22 August 2020 10: 01
    And I will not argue and argue anything, I will tell you my personal opinion. I like our Soviet red flag more, my grandfathers fought under it, and I grew up under it.
  9. +4
    22 August 2020 10: 41
    Quote: Note
    The trade flag has become one of the main symbols of the state. What else can I say.

    Down with!
    Yes, he did not, but was appointed, given. The difference is however. Become when based on tradition and sovereignty. And under Yeltsin ...... dali. A venal, mercenary flag cannot be the flag of an independent state.
    Historically, it was with the red banner that the Moscow princely squads went to battle. And according to the proletarian tradition, we took over the red flag from the Paris Commune.
    Whatever one may say, there is a red flag everywhere. request
  10. +3
    22 August 2020 12: 30
    Is there a holiday for the opening of the Yeltsin-drunk-center?
    1. +3
      22 August 2020 13: 09
      And these people have it all year round.
  11. +1
    22 August 2020 12: 35
    And why a holiday then? The day when the USSR was destroyed and Gauleiter's neovlas rags hung over the Kremlin.
    1. -4
      22 August 2020 13: 28
      Quote: Shore Cannes
      And why a holiday then? The day when the USSR was destroyed and Gauleiter's neovlas rags hung over the Kremlin.

      Well, the communists at the last congress announced the collapse of the Union, and before that they canceled Article 6 of the Constitution of the USSR ..
      1. -1
        22 August 2020 14: 53
        They were never communists. For communists and members of the CPSU are still very different concepts ..
        1. 0
          22 August 2020 15: 57
          Quote: paul3390
          They were never communists. For communists and members of the CPSU are still very different concepts ..

          I suspected this. Do not write like this anymore, the communists will be offended on such a non-native holiday for them ...
          1. +3
            22 August 2020 16: 05
            Well, I hope you don’t consider the nonesh bureaucrats and hucksters hanging around in the church and donating on them - Christians? For being a Christian is much more than baptizing your forehead with domes and wearing a golden cross all over your belly. This means - first of all, to live according to God's commandments .. Exactly the same difference between members of the CPSU and real communists. Well, do not you think for such, say Putin, Shoigu, Sechin and others like them? But they all had a party card ... But they are ordinary opportunists and careerists .. They are unworthy even to wipe the dust off their boots from the real communists of the era of Comrade Stalin ..
      2. 0
        22 August 2020 18: 53
        Neovlasovites, Banderlog, Zmagars and others of the riffraff announced the collapse of the USSR. There were no communists there.
    2. 0
      23 August 2020 07: 24
      Quote: Shore Cannes
      neovlasov's rags hung over the Kremlin

      I don't understand anything: there are VO Rules, where
      prohibited l) Use of derogatory language or nicknames in relation to Russia, its symbols and first persons.


      And then, through the commentary, THE State Banner of Russia is insulted.
  12. +2
    22 August 2020 12: 41
    Symbols are paramount, so understanding the true meaning of symbols is paramount.
    1. -2
      22 August 2020 13: 11
      For the dull, more detailed and simpler, please.
      1. +1
        22 August 2020 16: 02
        Let everyone dig for it on their own. For.
  13. +4
    22 August 2020 12: 49
    "..the arrangement of flowers, which has become familiar to us" ...
    But it was gone!
    Peter dragged everything European to Russia.
    And he brought the tricolor. Flag of hucksters and speculators.
    The Soviet red ylag cannot be confused with anything else. Even the PRC flag is not like that. And how many tricolors are there in the world ?! Including Slovenia and Slovakia .....
    So the red flag, the Red Banner, from which we took the Oath, will forever remain for me the main state symbols and shrines.
    And the tricolor will not become a shrine even for new generations. Other times, now priorities. The goal is loot, the main symbol is the green dollar.
  14. +3
    22 August 2020 13: 33
    Under the state flag, people go to new achievements, perform feats, save the flag when the enemy threatens to seize it and outrage the shrine. They are proud of the national flag. This is a part of the country that you shouldn't be ashamed of.
  15. +4
    22 August 2020 14: 02
    Quote: Bashkirkhan
    You, Detkastary, are a real traitor-Vlasovite, trying to turn the Russian people against their own past, to tear them away from their roots and from their history. Today we trample the flag of Peter and St. George's ribbon, symbols with a long history, and tomorrow, even easier, it will be possible to trample the symbols of the USSR ...

    The symbols of the USSR have long been "trampled" by the new masters of the Russian Federation. sad
  16. -1
    22 August 2020 15: 24
    Happy Holidays to ALL!
    Yes, many accomplishments were made under the red flag of a country whose history is an integral part of Russia. But today the flag of Russia is the same as it was approved by Peter the Great!
  17. -1
    22 August 2020 18: 04
    I didn't even know.
    It is somehow suspicious that the colors match the amerovskoy flag.
  18. +3
    22 August 2020 18: 46
    For me, "Russian Flag Day" is a holiday! Russia for me is the heiress of the Union. I am not changing my oath.
  19. 0
    22 August 2020 19: 16
    hot disputes ..., tricolor or ..., Vlasov, traitors, white movement ..., lost Russia ..., the real Russian Federation ..., has nothing to do with the Imperial, the tricolor is a civil flag, the flag of unserviceable classes. ..., yes, it fully meets the spirit of the times, the flag of bourgeois democracy, the flag of the February revolution ..., above it is white, below it is red, in the middle it is blue ..., such is it nowadays Russia - multicolored ..., not easy .. ...
    1. 0
      23 August 2020 21: 08
      For the last hundred years, the tricolor has been raised by scoundrels, traitors to the Russian people and what kind of feats the people have collected is known to everyone ... Eka, like red-striped vests on their chest tearing uryakalka ...