A video of the MiG-31 landing with a torn off wheel of the rear landing gear appeared on the web

54
A video of the MiG-31 landing with a torn off wheel of the rear landing gear appeared on the web

A video of the emergency landing of a MiG-31 fighter at the Bolshoye Savino airport in Perm has appeared on the Web. The emergency situation was reported earlier by the press service of the Central Military District.

As the press service explained, the MiG-31 fighter was performing a training flight; during the landing of the aircraft, one of the wheels of the rear landing gear was found to be destroyed. The MiG-31 crew, warned of the breakdown, managed to land the fighter without damage. The pilots were not injured or injured.



On August 11, in the Perm Territory, during the landing after a planned training flight of the MiG-31 aircraft, the flight director discovered the destruction of one of the wheels of the rear landing gear of the fighter. The flight director warned the aircraft commander about this. The crew made a normal landing, the plane was not damaged

- said in the message of the Central Military District.


Earlier, the emergency services of the region reported that the emergency services of the Perm airport (Bolshoye Savino) were expecting an emergency landing of a MiG-31 fighter, which had a wheel torn off during takeoff.

At the moment, the engineering and technical staff of the unit has carried out repairs of the MiG-31, a special commission will be investigating the reasons for the incident.
54 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +37
    12 August 2020 15: 40
    Well done pilots. We got out of an emergency situation professionally. I hope the command will appreciate it.
    1. +30
      12 August 2020 15: 52
      Quote: Leader of the Redskins
      Well done pilots. We got out of an emergency situation professionally.

      I support! Only not the back, but the main rack. (well it is). smile
      1. +1
        12 August 2020 16: 19
        I support! Only not the back, but the main rack. (well it is).

        So they seem to be paired, or both collapsed? And in the photo one wheel at a time, this is definitely Mig31 ???)))
        1. -5
          12 August 2020 16: 37
          Quote: loki565
          this is exactly Mig31 ???)))
          Yes he.

          Quote: loki565
          So they seem to be paired, or both collapsed?
          It says about the rack, not about the wheel. :))
        2. +9
          12 August 2020 16: 43
          this is exactly Mig31 ???)))


          This is the MiG-25rb. On the 31st there are 2 wheels of the main rack "by bicycle". And a cabin for two.
          1. +8
            12 August 2020 19: 05
            One of the two "pneumatics" on the left "cart" (on the other - on the left main rack) burst during takeoff.
            Well done !!! Then they planted it clearly and beautifully !!
            1. +4
              12 August 2020 19: 41
              One of the two "pneumatics" on the left "cart" burst

              Well, the "record holder" in this case was the B-58 from the Convert company. There they even put emergency disks in case of a tire explosion. On them and rolled on the concrete. laughing So they paid for the lack of landing wing mechanization and the huge landing speed. And all for the sake of range.
              Look, interesting goose. Of course the most famous is the 2000 Concorde disaster. There the tire has done things.
            2. 0
              12 August 2020 20: 20
              So the tire (pneumatic) burst, or the wheel came off? All the same, very different incidents.
              1. +3
                12 August 2020 20: 23
                Can you imagine what a pneumatic rupture is on takeoff?
                And then landing on the disk?
                1. +2
                  12 August 2020 20: 55
                  I can imagine, because I saw it (true, on civilian aircraft), but what would happen if the wheel came off, as in the article, I can hardly imagine, or rather with horror. Therefore, I am specifying.
                2. +7
                  13 August 2020 04: 12
                  Can you imagine what a pneumatic rupture is on takeoff?
                  Uv.NN52, in 1987. the pilots of my regiment Lolikarpov and Lipatov managed to land a twin Su-17 with the duct of the right main strut torn off during takeoff. Moreover, during takeoff, they also struck the racks along the runway with a metal "stub".

                  This led to a sharp turn in the takeoff course to the right. The antenna of the RSBN cockpit was almost demolished. So they found out about the separation of the entire dutik (along with its axis) immediately on takeoff (RP confirmed this to them). But no one yet knew that the blown off dutik hit the right tail fin. In short, the RP gave them the command to "eject", but they made a decision: we sit down! It was OGO-GO. They turned off the engine before touching the runway, so the landing took place in a ringing spring silence. The course of landing was chosen by them in such a way that the contact with the "mosle" of the right pillar would entail them into the primer of the IVVP (which actually happened). I remember the whole life of the pop of the brake parachute in complete silence! (because when landing with the engine running, it is almost impossible to distinguish it). When turning from the runway to the IVVP in the latter, they made an earthen dump about 300 meters (like after a plow in a sowing area). Both are without injury. Both were awarded medals.
                  1. +1
                    13 August 2020 08: 33
                    Here are the stories you need to publish on VO good can you play an article?
                    1. +2
                      21 August 2020 14: 07
                      I was the first to approach the plane. During landing, I was in my dedicated service (PDS) car near the runway, so immediately after stopping the SU-17 on this machine, the runway ran over (the Su-17 was a weather reconnaissance, so there were no other aircraft in the air) and stopped at the edge of the GVVP , for further on was the March mud. Almost all the snow had melted and the earth was swollen with water. But I was in flying boots with high ankle boots (those with metal locks), so I went to the plane, spitting on the mud. The rest of the chiefs, having jumped up to the GVVP in their service cars, did not dare to climb into the mud in their shoes. The pilots have already opened the lights and got out: from the first cockpit - onto the nose cone of the air intake; from the second - to the gargrot behind the cabin. That is, they didn't really want to get into the mud either. lol I asked them “why didn’t they jump, because the RP gave such a command”. To which he received the answer "yes, we flew to the designated area of ​​ejection, and there the river overflowed so much (March and intense melting of snow) that it is not clear where the river is, and where the land is flooded with water. Therefore, the prospect of being in the March river caused them a persistent rejection Therefore, they decided to sit down, which was reported to the RP. " I agreed with them and went around the plane to have a look (what was on it and how). What I saw: The leading edge of the ball's right height stabilizer is badly deformed. A deep dent (here it is - the dutik that bounced off so much force majeure along with the axle) led the end cut of the stabilizer towards the fuselage, so much so that the gap remained less than a centimeter (the thumb of my palm still crawled through, but the thumb was gone). I reported this to the pilots. To which Polikarpov replied that they, too, were puzzled by the incomprehensible shaking of the plane at any turn. We tried to see something in the rearview mirror, but we couldn't. And no wonder. The most important thing is that the stabilizer did not jam on the fuselage !!! (pah, pah, pah three times!).
                      About 15 minutes later, a techies' Ural made their way to us, and the pilots jumped from the fuselage into the open body. So, without getting dirty with spring mud, they got to the concrete GDP, where the general's "Volga" were already waiting for them.
                      This is how I remember that sunny spring day ... drinks
                      hi
                  2. +4
                    13 August 2020 15: 38
                    Colleague, allow me to urge you? The runway is a runway with artificial turf, the primer is the runway. wink
                    And in general, landing without engines is cool. My classmate, upon failure of the SU and landing, were sent documents for rewarding. A refusal came with motivation - the plane is intact, the pilot is alive, so there is no composition of the feat. This is such a mess now.
                    Now she carries passengers in civilian life.
          2. +1
            12 August 2020 20: 19
            The 25th, even RB, does not have a tandem main strut, but with a single pneumatic. Don't mislead the ignorant!
            And even more so about the "bicycle" chassis is not worth trying
            1. +2
              12 August 2020 20: 28
              The 25th, even RB, does not have a tandem main strut, but with a single pneumatic. Don't mislead the ignorant!


              At least insert a quote so that you can see who you are answering. In my picture, the 31st, in the photo in the article - 25rb.
              By the way, I also found a variant with vertical triangular plates on anti-flutter wing weights.
              1. 0
                12 August 2020 20: 41
                I confess - I don't know how to insert a quote ..
                1. 0
                  12 August 2020 23: 27
                  Quote: Turist1996
                  I confess - I don't know how to insert a quote ..

                  Under the message that you want to comment, there is an inscription "Reply" - press it. In the text of the future opponent, underline the text that you want to comment (with the right mouse button). Press the "Quote" button. Well, then, type in the text of your comment.
          3. +1
            12 August 2020 20: 34
            Revised the video - I apologize! You won't understand in the video, but it really looks much more like the 25th, not the 31st ..
            1. 0
              13 August 2020 05: 07
              Quote: Turist1996
              Revised the video - I apologize! You won't understand in the video, but it really looks much more like the 25th, not the 31st ..

              And here..
      2. +1
        13 August 2020 15: 37
        That's right, the main rack)
    2. +12
      12 August 2020 15: 53
      The MiG-31 crew managed to land the fighter without damage.
      Well done! And Happy Holidays! drinks
      1. +11
        12 August 2020 16: 01
        By the way, yes! Happy Holidays, heaven !!!
      2. +3
        12 August 2020 17: 48
        Quote: Uncle Lee
        The MiG-31 crew managed to land the fighter without damage.
        Well done! And Happy Holidays! drinks

        Professionals, the car feels like its continuation ..! Happy Russian Air Force Holiday.
        Peaceful sky for YOU and for us of course drinks
  2. Hog
    +13
    12 August 2020 15: 43
    And what side is the photo of the MiG-25?
    1. 0
      12 August 2020 20: 12
      Quote: Hog
      And what side is the photo of the MiG-25?

      И the back landing gear, which can be in an aircraft with a bicycle scheme, such as Yak-25/28, 3M, Il-54 ...
  3. +4
    12 August 2020 15: 47
    Well done, and RP and pilots and letak! Good news!
  4. +4
    12 August 2020 15: 59
    They showed skill and courage ... Well done. They also saved an expensive car. good
    1. +4
      12 August 2020 16: 51
      It happens. They will figure it out and say who is great.
  5. +6
    12 August 2020 16: 19
    Sokoliki, Happy Air Force Holiday!
  6. +1
    12 August 2020 16: 30
    Some resources indicate that the pilots were not combatants, but cadets hi But, the main thing is that they acted without panic, clearly according to the instructions!
    1. +3
      12 August 2020 17: 33
      Hardly cadets. The regiment is a combatant; cadets are not trained. The expression “training flight” could have been misleading.
      1. +2
        12 August 2020 19: 07
        The lieutenants are being taken out ... In the rear cockpit there is an experienced pilot-instructor.
    2. +1
      12 August 2020 17: 53
      Quote: Thrifty
      Some resources indicate that the pilots were not combatants, but cadets hi But, the main thing is that they acted without panic, clearly according to the instructions!

      Cadets on the MiG-31? belay
    3. 0
      13 August 2020 05: 07
      Bredyatina some media. Cadets are not taken to the MiG-31.
    4. +1
      13 August 2020 15: 43
      Well, yes, 31 cadets, yeah laughing In Soviet times, at least class 2 could fly on it, and for the most part only with the first. Since 1996, they began to roll out leytech, but even then only after flights on the MiG-25PU. And you are cadets ...
  7. +5
    12 August 2020 17: 15
    Photo on the screen saver - MiG-25
    1. +6
      12 August 2020 17: 48
      Quote: Fitter65
      Photo on the screen saver - MiG-25

      Moreover, it is also taking off. The fast and the furious are on. The MiG-25 (31) is a harsh machine, like a hangover hedgehog, but still not enough to sit in afterburner modes.
  8. +1
    12 August 2020 17: 20
    The guys did it. Respect!
  9. 0
    12 August 2020 17: 25
    whose wheel came off during takeoff.
    Runway! angry
    1. 0
      12 August 2020 18: 05
      Quote: Mavrikiy
      whose wheel came off during takeoff.
      Runway! angry

      Airfield / runway co-based (with shpak) - and nobody knows? Amazing business. Maybe a jamb of old technology? Or service?
  10. +6
    12 August 2020 17: 28
    Does the MiG-31 have a rear landing gear? what And the lads are great, they carefully planted the apparatus. The Turks would have to see that they would understand what the talent and dexterity of a pilot means (the other day at VO there was about Turkish enthusiasm about the flight of their F-16 near the ship).
    1. 0
      12 August 2020 18: 52
      Quote: Captive
      The Turks would have to see that they would understand what the talent and dexterity of a pilot means (the other day at VO there was about Turkish enthusiasm about the flight of their F-16 near the ship).
      But this is yes. The flight of a fighter, even with some kind of buns, tweaks is one thing, and landing in an emergency situation is another. That the situation was clearly extremely abnormal is clear to anyone: either the rubber could be "demolished" or the entire wheel. In both cases, the consequences are unpredictable. The guys are definitely worthy of the award. And not excuses in the form of "gratitude before the formation", but real.
  11. +3
    12 August 2020 17: 45
    Do not say ... sat down nicely.
    If it were not for the article, I would not have immediately understood what the video is about.
    Happy holiday guys! Well, really - Happy Birthday! drinks
  12. +2
    12 August 2020 17: 53
    Happy Air Force Day !!!!
  13. 0
    12 August 2020 18: 17
    Letunov, happy holidays!
  14. 0
    12 August 2020 20: 27
    I read "Half a Century with the Sky" by E.Ya.Savitsky - there he had to endure a similar episode: he took off as an overflight pilot (as a representative of the customer from the Air Force) on a MiG-15 - everything was smooth, no problems, the chassis was removed, he was going to go to the "zone" to work flight mission. And to him with the CP: "be on the circle!" And so on until almost complete fuel consumption.
    It turned out that a wheel from one of the main struts flew off during takeoff.
    So here!
  15. +1
    12 August 2020 20: 28
    There is no rear landing gear for the MIG-31. There are front and main struts.
  16. +1
    12 August 2020 20: 52
    Well done asses, what to say on the holiday of all those involved!
  17. 0
    12 August 2020 21: 11
    The main strut pneumatic burst. The rear pillar was at the Il-62.
  18. 0
    12 August 2020 22: 50
    The pilots are great! And questions to the flight director may appear during analysis. On the video start
    For some reason, the fire truck did not go to the plane from taxiing, barely began to move, and there is not one main fire truck in the stopped plane on the video, just as there is no medical car. Or did the glorious firefighters spend the entire foaming agent on disinfecting the airfield from the coronavirus and there was no one to fill the chassis that was burning and there was nothing?
  19. 0
    12 August 2020 23: 38
    Happy Air Force Day !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  20. 0
    13 August 2020 01: 40
    So what's next? What's wrong with that happened?
    And on the top photo in general, the MiG-25 (it has more wheels and one per rack). To me, too, editors of a serious military publication ... fool
  21. -1
    13 August 2020 20: 39
    I landed professionally, but I also used the parachute for braking