American general: We are ready to deploy missiles capable of sinking Chinese warships


Chinese aircraft carrier "Shandong"



General James McConville, a spokesman for the US military, said about the "Chinese threat to the disputed islands in the Pacific seas." According to the American military leader, "it is very important for the United States to ensure the safety of the islands that China is making claims to."

McConville, in his statement on the "threat from the PRC," indicated that the United States is going to deploy medium-range missiles in the Asia-Pacific region. From the statement of the US Army General:

We are preparing medium-range missiles that will penetrate the Chinese shield.

It is important to recall that the United States previously withdrew from the treaty on the elimination of intermediate and shorter-range missiles. Now, having untied its hands in the missile plan, the Pentagon is ready to go to a new round of aggravation in relations with China. The US general does not say where exactly the US is going to deploy medium-range missiles “capable of penetrating the Chinese shield”.

At the same time, the American and Japanese press notes that these may be territories that allow missiles to "reach" both mainland China and the Taiwan Strait. The publications say that if the Chinese army "knows about such a missile capability of the United States, it can cool its ardor."

General James McConville:

We are ready to deploy missiles capable of sinking Chinese warships.

In China, these statements of the American general have not yet been officially commented on.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

73 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Hunter 2 1 August 2020 15: 58 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    The Chinese will definitely not meet such a "statement" with Fireworks! The situation will heat up!
    1. Clear 1 August 2020 16: 13 New
      • 10
      • 5
      +5
      American general: We are ready to deploy missiles capable of sinking Chinese warships

      Oh, what a brave general winked .
      And then Pompeo once again modestly repeat will say
      "anti-aircraft systems around the world are not always successful"
      Remember, after the American Patriots failed to repulse the attack on Saudi Arabia crying
      1. Insurgent 1 August 2020 16: 35 New
        • 8
        • 5
        +3
        American general: We are ready to deploy missiles capable of sinking Chinese warships

        In the meantime, others prepare to sink American aircraft carriers.

        A mock-up target of an American aircraft carrier sunk during a large-scale Iranian exercise + video of rocket firing.


        1. Mitroha 1 August 2020 16: 53 New
          • 8
          • 3
          +5
          it is very important for the United States to ensure the safety of the islands that China is making claims to. "

          What do you care about these islands, you are sitting on the continent of America, well, don't shine. There is a plug in every barrel
        2. Charik 1 August 2020 16: 55 New
          • 3
          • 2
          +1
          You can't sink an avik with such a bomb from an UAV - in addition to anti-aircraft guns, it should also have nearby missiles
          1. Insurgent 1 August 2020 16: 56 New
            • 3
            • 6
            -3
            Quote: Charik
            You can't sink an avik with such a bomb from an UAV - in addition to anti-aircraft guns, it should also have nearby missiles

            You watch ALL the video yes
            1. Charik 1 August 2020 17: 01 New
              • 3
              • 3
              0
              -And- after the UAV rocket firing, where? What? There is no video of a missile strike in Avik
              1. Insurgent 1 August 2020 17: 02 New
                • 4
                • 6
                -2
                Quote: Charik
                -And- after the UAV rocket firing, where? What? There is no video of a missile strike in Avik


                What the Iranians found it possible to show, they showed.

                Enough with you and the photo lying on the side of the target layout yes



                1. Charik 1 August 2020 17: 07 New
                  • 7
                  • 12
                  -5
                  they did not show how they sunk the avik, well, if only a water funnel was organized by a carousel of boats and it was sucked in laughing
                2. Voyager 1 August 2020 17: 15 New
                  • 6
                  • 11
                  -5
                  Iran has nothing to sink the whole AUG with.
                  1. Observer2014 1 August 2020 17: 48 New
                    • 5
                    • 7
                    -2
                    Quote: Voyager
                    Iran has nothing to sink the whole AUG with.

                    How there is nothing ?! "Insurgent" Clearly showed how and what will and need to drown the Americans' AUG. wassat
                  2. Charik 1 August 2020 19: 28 New
                    • 0
                    • 3
                    -3
                    a conversation about the avik they made - from which is also interesting
            2. Observer2014 1 August 2020 17: 41 New
              • 6
              • 8
              -2
              Quote: Insurgent
              Quote: Charik
              You can't sink an avik with such a bomb from an UAV - in addition to anti-aircraft guns, it should also have nearby missiles

              You watch ALL the video yes

              Well, have you watched all your videos, what's next? Die from laughter right away? Or wait for your minuses? crying wassat laughing
          2. mdsr 1 August 2020 19: 12 New
            • 4
            • 7
            -3
            Quote: Charik
            You can't sink an avik with such a bomb from an UAV - in addition to anti-aircraft guns, it should also have nearby missiles

            The aircraft carriers themselves have practically no air defense, but they are covered by several destroyers and cruisers, which have hundreds of air defense missiles and the Aegis system.
            never showed what avik
            Opened the kingstones or exploded pre-laid TNT below the waterline winked But seriously, in case of a possible American attack on Iran, the aircraft carrier groups will be at a decent distance from the coast, and all the time they will be in motion, while being at the same time within reach of Iranian targets by carrier-based aircraft. The main attack will be delivered by coastal aviation from numerous ground airfields. In this situation, the possibility of the defeat of the aircraft carrier by the Iranians will be close to zero. Iran's main response will be with short- and medium-range missiles at numerous American bases in the Middle East.
            1. Charik 1 August 2020 19: 33 New
              • 1
              • 1
              0
              Anti-aircraft artillery 3 or 4 × 20-mm AU Mk 15 [1] or ASMD
              Missile armament 16-24 launchers "Sea Sparrow" [1] is practically nothing? Anti-aircraft guns and sispers
        3. paco.soto 1 August 2020 16: 56 New
          • 2
          • 3
          -1
          Thank you for the information ! Interesting!
        4. Observer2014 1 August 2020 17: 23 New
          • 5
          • 12
          -7
          "Insurgent" - I especially liked your second video. I feel deep knowledge of military issues yes laughing wassatHa ha ha !!!! Who is so active on our site? : I am silent, I am silent. lol
          1. Insurgent 1 August 2020 17: 48 New
            • 9
            • 5
            +4
            Quote: Observer2014
            "Insurgent" - I especially liked your second video. I feel deep knowledge of military issues

            Claims for "non-professional video selection"(is this the case?) can you show your colleague Boris Rozhin (Colonel Cassad).

            Photos and videos, as it is, from his blog in LJ, but with my comments and ratings.

            Quote: Observer2014
            Who is so active here on our site?


            Strange affair what ... Why do you need to know my "ins and outs" more than that I am from the DNR?

            And what kind of individual are you, hovering under the flag of the DPR, but clearly having nothing to do with Donbass?

            Gulchatay, throw off your balaclava yes
            1. Observer2014 1 August 2020 17: 56 New
              • 3
              • 9
              -6
              Insurgent
              Gulchatay, throw off your balaclava
              Well throw it off laughingLet's go already with God. Notice I am silent, I can’t speak, but I am silent. lolAbout the Iranian achievements in the military-industrial complex, the video finally "finished off". laughing Well, study the MAT part in the end! Compare. Make a conclusion. Analyze !!!! Well, in the end, consult with someone who understands both in the military sphere. And politics at the same time. For all this is INTERCONNECTED !!!
              1. Insurgent 1 August 2020 18: 05 New
                • 9
                • 6
                +3
                Quote: Observer2014
                Well, throw it off. Come on with God. Notice I am silent, I can’t speak, but I am silent.

                Of course, a fugitive from Ukraine, to whom Russia has never become a beloved Motherland, has nothing to say.

                Remind " highly patriotic whining "?


                Observer 2014 April 25, 2020 15:53

                -36
                In Finland, they tried to justify the creation of concentration camps in Karelia during the war

                Quote: tarakan
                Clever "observer" come to Latvia and look at our pensioners, run away


                Quote: Observer2014
                I am also an example to follow. Will there be proposals from Sweden, for example, and other normal socially developed countries? I’ll leave with pleasure! And then you feel nauseous with your favorite examples. laughing My wife's friends last year who left for Vatsapu threw off the vidos. That they brought the Spanish red cross home! For a week. There is my monthly salary.Linus even to death.
                1. Observer2014 1 August 2020 18: 10 New
                  • 2
                  • 12
                  -10
                  Quote: Insurgent
                  Quote: Observer2014
                  Well, throw it off. Come on with God. Notice I am silent, I can’t speak, but I am silent.

                  Of course, a fugitive from Ukraine, to whom Russia has never become a beloved Motherland, has nothing to say.

                  Remind me of "patriotic whining"?


                  Observer 2014 April 25, 2020 15:53

                  -36
                  In Finland, they tried to justify the creation of concentration camps in Karelia during the war

                  Quote: tarakan
                  Clever "observer" come to Latvia and look at our pensioners, run away


                  Quote: Observer2014
                  I am also an example to follow. Will there be proposals from Sweden, for example, and other normal socially developed countries? I’ll leave with pleasure! And then you feel nauseous with your favorite examples. laughing My wife's friends last year who left for Vatsapu threw off the vidos. That they brought the Spanish red cross home! For a week. There is my monthly salary.Linus even to death.

                  laughing Well, what should be clear here? wassat Go before you are offended. wassat Specifically about the discussion article, put something smart at least? I posted an Iranian video, laughing then what? Will you flood? Or your nickname is not dear to you? Let's further discuss the Iranian military capabilities.
                  1. Insurgent 1 August 2020 18: 16 New
                    • 10
                    • 5
                    +5
                    Quote: Observer2014
                    Go before you are offended.

                    Fortunately, I am independent from such pseudo-DNRists in choosing where and when to go. yes

                    Be rude, more unpleasant material will be published yes If you insult, I will do it within the framework of the VO yes

                    Quote: Observer2014
                    Will you flood?



                    Flood began to impose you, with your appearance in the topic.
                    1. The comment was deleted.
                      1. The comment was deleted.
                      2. The comment was deleted.
        5. paco.soto 1 August 2020 18: 31 New
          • 4
          • 2
          +2
          Insurgent "- I especially liked your second video. One can feel deep knowledge in military matters yes laughing wassat
          Neutral opinion: even I have a poor lawyer with insufficient coverage of licenses has all the "bio" for this respected comrade.
          As a lawyer, I ask you not to spread rot on Kamrad!
          1. Insurgent 1 August 2020 18: 44 New
            • 4
            • 3
            +1
            Quote: paco.soto
            I have a poor lawyer with insufficient coverage of licenses has all the "bio" for this respected comrade.
            As a lawyer, I ask you not to spread rot on Kamrad!

            Thank you, but I don’t need the services of a lawyer yet (but I don’t promise laughing wink )
            I fight off such ukhars myself ...

            What kind of "bio"? I hope not compromising wassat ?
            1. paco.soto 1 August 2020 19: 02 New
              • 4
              • 1
              +3
              Thank you, but I don’t need the services of a lawyer yet (but I don’t promise either laughing wink)
              I fight off such ukhars myself ...

              What kind of "bio"? Hopefully not compromising wassat?
              Reply ©
              I am sorry for my comment. My pathetic excuse: shouldn't have posted this comment!
              Regards to you.
              But you really do have a presence in European Internet databases. Please don't worry! So far, these are only internet bases,
              Regards to you.
    2. Ghost of reagan 1 August 2020 16: 42 New
      • 2
      • 18
      -16
      I've been waiting for the S-300/400 to show itself. The Patriot, with its modifications, has at least some statistics, in contrast to the air defense that does not have an air defense system. So far I saw how the C200 instead of the F-16 shot down an IL-20. I'm very interested in how the S-300/400 will show itself against a tomahawk, for example, or a more or less expensive UAV. While I see how the IDF Air Force with F-35s has been mocking the Syrian S-300 for months.
      1. carstorm 11 1 August 2020 16: 52 New
        • 7
        • 4
        +3
        but how, for example, does the tactical YaB work? no one seems to use them either)
      2. Clear 1 August 2020 16: 58 New
        • 10
        • 5
        +5
        Quote: Reagan's Ghost
        I've been waiting for the S-300/400 to show itself.
        Don't wait for the squirrel today, it's worse than you winked

        Quote: Reagan's Ghost
        While I see how the IDF Air Force with F-35s has been mocking the Syrian S-300 for months.
        Where are the Russian calculations? wink Or not?
      3. paco.soto 1 August 2020 17: 11 New
        • 4
        • 4
        0
        Turkey has officially announced its intentions to transfer to the United States all the necessary technologies related to the S-400 complexes acquired from Russia. This is caused by Ankara's attempt to remain in the program of the American fifth-generation F-35 fighter, moreover, Turkey itself does not hide this at all, directly stating that it is ready to eliminate all US concerns from a technical point of view. ©
        https://avia.pro/news/turciya-obyavila-o-peredache-ssha-tehnologiy-rossiyskih-s-400

        There is such information. Only I apologize: there is no time to check now on the English-language resources.
        1. Grazdanin 1 August 2020 22: 02 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: paco.soto
          Turkey itself does not hide this at all, directly stating that it is ready to eliminate all US concerns from a technical point of view

          https://twitter.com/tcsavunma/status/1288378945688215552?s=20
          There is nowhere official.
      4. Pete mitchell 1 August 2020 17: 41 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        Quote: Reagan's Ghost
        So far I've seen C200 instead of ...

        .. do not confuse mediocre database management with decent planning in a real situation .. it is also necessary to remember about Tupolev
  2. To be or not to be 1 August 2020 17: 54 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    General. do not drool .. declare and sink are two different things ..
  • Eldorado 1 August 2020 16: 02 New
    • 2
    • 4
    -2
    Let them just try! The PRC will also place something somewhere. wassat
    The situation in the Pacific region continues to heat up.
  • Dmitry Makarov 1 August 2020 16: 04 New
    • 10
    • 7
    +3
    The United States is an industrial dwarf compared to China, and it is suicidal for Americans to start a new Cold War in such conditions.
    During the confrontation with the USSR, the Americans at least had an adequate industrial base, and today there are hundreds of millions of barbershops, stock exchange traders and simply unemployed blacks.
    1. Courier 1 August 2020 18: 17 New
      • 1
      • 14
      -13
      No industry has helped your SeSeSeR, and this Chinaland will not help either.
      Where is the dollar, and where the yuan does not help the yuan, this is an industry, comradesi)
  • Grazdanin 1 August 2020 16: 06 New
    • 6
    • 9
    -3

    Location of US bases. To understand the danger to China.
    1. ximkim 1 August 2020 16: 15 New
      • 2
      • 2
      0
      A rocket fence will be erected near China. Well, probably China will show a crowbar and an ax to US help
    2. nPuBaTuP 1 August 2020 16: 40 New
      • 3
      • 1
      +2
      I think the Philippines can be removed from this list ..... they are unlikely to be allowed to place anything there for mattresses ..... they recently are not happy with them ...
    3. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
  • Gloomy skeptic 1 August 2020 16: 10 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    Quote: Dmitry Makarov
    and today it is hundreds of millions of barbershops, stock traders and simply unemployed blacks.

    You do not understand anything, because they are the "force"! How they distinguished themselves in robbing and burning shops with rags, as well as washing each other's dirty feet!
  • zenion 1 August 2020 16: 17 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    The missiles can be placed so that if they do not hit the Chinese ships, they will return to where they were fired from.
  • Crash 1 August 2020 16: 25 New
    • 5
    • 1
    +4
    We are preparing medium-range missiles that will penetrate the Chinese shield.

    Well, the real reason for the breakup of the INF Treaty has officially surfaced. And then all the Russians violate ...
  • tralflot1832 1 August 2020 16: 25 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    Everything is within the reach of Chinese missiles and there are definitely no "beacons" on them for the guidance of US anti-missile defense systems. And the Chinese have already poured concrete on the disputed islands. Welcome.
  • Mountain shooter 1 August 2020 16: 42 New
    • 0
    • 4
    -4
    They are bluffing again, like a cheat ... Where do they have these missiles? What are the performance characteristics? How many missiles and launchers were made?
  • paco.soto 1 August 2020 16: 44 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    The United States is an industrial dwarf compared to China, and it is suicidal for Americans to start a new Cold War in such conditions.
    Neutral opinion: air raid lights off !, disagree - it is very hot outside today. (with smile)
    The United States is not a "dwarf", but probably the main consumer of the products of the Chinese economy. Metaphorically, these statements remind me of our everyday neighborly friendly barbaco-drunkenness here with Russian oligarchs. Measure plans, discuss possibilities, think, accept reality and pour again. And again, defeat everyone and pour again (with a smile)
    I apologize if the metaphor "touched a bare nerve" to someone
  • Vladimir61 1 August 2020 16: 59 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    And China does not need to prepare! He, in his region, has long been ready for any development of events - "And Vaska listens, but eats!"
  • Free wind 1 August 2020 16: 59 New
    • 1
    • 3
    -2
    I wonder who writes such articles, even if they were interested in the material. The missile treaty deals with land-based missiles. Sea-based missiles are out of the question in the treaty. Therefore, ships and boats with Tomahawks do not violate any agreements. Happy weekend to you.
  • fruit_cake 1 August 2020 17: 04 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    Does the United States have high-precision bombs located on Earth's orbiting satellites? the aircraft carrier is a rather large target, why are there any missiles, launch yourself from a satellite, from several, one will hit
  • Zaurbek 1 August 2020 17: 05 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    But what if China starts to deploy MRBMs where necessary? And the base?
  • Pandiurin 1 August 2020 17: 09 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    A futile arms race.
    The Americans in the countries surrounding China will deploy a bunch of INFs. China will do the same for the Chinese INF targets these countries and bases. Quite quickly, these INF missiles will be replaced from conventional to nuclear missiles.
    In parallel, the states will sell petriot and promote Aegis missile defense in the region. China is planning to increase all the constituent strategic nuclear forces.

    Russia, too, most likely will have to increase the quantitative component to match the club. Only the question of the INF Treaty on a massive scale will be required for Russia or not.
    Most likely it will depend on the situation in the EU. The states will probably want to host, but will the EU agree to accept these gifts.
    1. Zaurbek 1 August 2020 20: 16 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Under this case, I'll have to put rockets on the Far East
    2. Arthur 85 1 August 2020 22: 02 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Rather, we must wait for November - will the states even exist on the globe.
  • rocket757 1 August 2020 17: 21 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    Again, nothing new. Anything sho you want, just away from their shores.
    That's when / if in "their sandbox" the movement will spread, expand, then they will act differently.
  • paco.soto 1 August 2020 18: 15 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    Combing with bewilderment an old man's beard and laughing - in the voice of a "kid kibalchish": listen to comrades - it seems to no one that I don’t know where to leave from here or to demand that the new moderators return the old tube VO, without trolls?
    I would be grateful for your answers.
    1. Grazdanin 1 August 2020 23: 13 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Where? There are funny comments on Thedrive, but it's still hard for me in English, I have to strain.
  • Courier 1 August 2020 18: 21 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    It seems to mean a translation error.
    In order to sink ships, the United States does not need medium-range missiles, they are usually ballistic.

    Medium-range missiles, aka Pershing, are needed directly for strikes on the territory.
  • tralflot1832 1 August 2020 18: 32 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    : They can't cope with Comrade Eun, but they are aiming at China. By the way, Eun hasn’t said anything for a long time, then he has a reason. Big brother is offended. am
  • AB
    AB 1 August 2020 19: 20 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    General James McConville 100% go. From. China will never backtrack on disputed islands in the Pacific seas.
  • Charik 1 August 2020 19: 36 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    I wonder if ShanDun has any toys from the air defense system that are similar to Kuznetsov's ali no
  • From Tomsk 1 August 2020 19: 36 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    So China has nuclear weapons. Another delirium.
  • Charik 1 August 2020 19: 38 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Anti-aircraft artillery 3 × 11 × 30-mm ZAK Type 1130- somebody explain how to understand this
    1. Crash 2 August 2020 07: 04 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      ZAK "Type 1130" is armed with a 14 mm H / PJ-30 cannon. The main feature of this gun is a rotating block with 11 barrels. The barrel block is attached to the body of the gun and is also held in place by a special frame. The proposed original design of the gun made it possible to increase the rate of fire to 10 thousand rounds per minute. It was reported that with such characteristics, the Type 1130 anti-aircraft complex is capable of shooting down missiles flying at speeds up to M = 4, with a probability of 96%

      https://topwar.ru/63769-korabelnye-zenitnye-artilleriyskie-kompleksy-type-730-i-type-1130-kitay.html
      1. Charik 2 August 2020 12: 21 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        so for the number 11, I did not understand what it means, now I see-11-barrel-3 pieces
  • zwlad 1 August 2020 19: 42 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Is China already scared? And nothing that the Chinese can bang nuclear weapons in the United States right now and they do not need to place anything anywhere. Everything is already on alert.
  • voyaka uh 1 August 2020 21: 01 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    "they didn’t show how they drowned the avik-well, if only a water funnel was organized by a carousel of boats and it was sucked in" ///
    ----
    The Iranians have such an old tradition: once a year they build a model of an American aircraft carrier,
    take him out to sea and cheerfully drown him with rockets.
    It's kind of a tradition to go to the bathhouse on New Year's Eve in "Enjoy Your Bath".
    Traditions must not be violated! fellow
    1. Arthur 85 1 August 2020 21: 59 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      H'm. Is there any problem with the sinking of an aircraft carrier in the Persian Gulf? From the Indian Ocean he can act, but in a puddle he is kaput.
  • Pandiurin 1 August 2020 21: 08 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: Courier
    It seems to mean a translation error.
    In order to sink ships, the United States does not need medium-range missiles, they are usually ballistic.

    Medium-range missiles, aka Pershing, are needed directly for strikes on the territory.


    Perhaps, as according to Freud, the general was thinking about the fleet that could be sunk, the American fleet.

    China is developing its forces more and more. The notorious A2AD zone is expanding.
    If, for example, with Taiwan, the states need to demonstrate support, then they will be able to approach the fleet at a distance where they can operate, but they will find themselves in this zone, i.e. if you rock the boat then they will ogrebut in full.
    How to support Taiwan or another ally without substituting the Navy. It is necessary in the region to place a bunch of missiles on foreign territory.
  • Arthur 85 1 August 2020 21: 56 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Not fresh, but yankee go home.
  • APASUS 1 August 2020 22: 25 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    We are ready to deploy missiles capable of sinking Chinese warships.

    The peacekeepers have arrived!
  • Plastmaster 1 August 2020 22: 35 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: Courier
    No industry has helped your SeSeSeR, and this Chinaland will not help either.
    Where is the dollar, and where the yuan does not help the yuan, this is an industry, comradesi)

    What is this kindergarten?
  • Tagan 2 August 2020 05: 52 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Quote: Courier
    No industry has helped your SeSeSeR, and this Chinaland will not help either.
    Where is the dollar, and where the yuan does not help the yuan, this is an industry, comradesi)

    Your SeSheA is already a dead lion, puffing out its cheeks by inertia, with GDP sagging by a third in a few months and 40 million. unemployed (about 20 percent). Even drawing a few trillion greens didn't help. Hurry to the waste paper collection point)))
    "this industry does not help the yuan" - what is this all about? More often the yuan helps the industry.
  • Mavrikiy 2 August 2020 06: 16 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    At the same time, the American and Japanese press notes that these may be territories that allow missiles to "reach" both mainland China and the Taiwan Strait. The publications say that if the Chinese army "knows about such a missile capability of the United States, it can cool its ardor."
    Kindergarten, junior group. "And I have this at home, only dad does not allow"
    In China, these statements of the American general have not yet been officially commented on.
    What can I say? request , fool Biden's insanity has not yet entered into force. What lies ahead for the world? request
  • 5-9
    5-9 2 August 2020 11: 01 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Generally it is not clear what is meant .... US Chinese MRBM ships going to sink chtol? Or RCC (which? LRASM only) will be installed on land around?
    Okay, let them compete THERE ... it's easier for us
  • K298rtm 2 August 2020 11: 07 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The general has not yet remembered about torpedoes (or does he not know about them?).