In Belarus, they tested the modernized 9M114MB anti-tank missile

A video of tests of a new anti-tank missile conducted in Belarus appeared on the Web. The video on its YouTube channel was posted by the Belarusian TV channel VoenTV.

As stated in the description of the video, an updated 9M114MB anti-tank missile was tested at the Obuz-Lesnovsky training ground in the Brest region. This missile is used for firing from the 9K113 complex, located on a Mi-24 helicopter, from 9P149 and 9P133 combat vehicles. As part of the modernization, the weight of the rocket was reduced, the flight range was increased, and the control unit was also changed.

During the tests of the modernized missile, firing was carried out at the minimum and maximum distance of destruction (400 and 6 thousand meters, respectively). In addition, a missile was shot with a warhead at an armored object (decommissioned MT-LB tractor unit). Based on the results of firing, the tests were recognized as successful, the objectives of the tests were achieved.

The tests involved artillery calculations from the 11th Guards Mechanized Brigade of the Armed Forces of Belarus. Shooting was carried out from an anti-tank missile system (ATGM) 9P149 "Sturm-S", made on the basis of the multi-purpose floating light armored transporter-tractor MT-LB.

Comments

[tlauicol]

non-contact detonation. shock core?

[loki565]

no, the campaign went high and hit the manhole cover.

[svp67]

Quote: loki565

no, the campaign went high and hit the manhole cover.

Beat from the hill, as it was in excess.

[Uncle Izya]

It’s not from a good life that all this, any junk to modernize Belarus boasted that it was launching its own rockets or maybe for other poor countries

[svp67]

Quote: Uncle Izya

It’s not from a good life that all this, any junk to modernize Belarus boasted that it was launching its own rockets or maybe for other poor countries

Earlier, Belarus worked closely with Ukraine in the creation of modern ATGMs, Belarus made command devices, and Ukraine made missiles. So the ATGM "Stugna" turned out. I will not be surprised that cooperation continues

[Uncle Izya]

Belarusian "Thunderstorm" lit up in war in Libya


A Belarusian-made jamming station came into northern Africa in transit through the UAE.
Alexander ALESIN / 12.07.2020/14/17 / XNUMX:XNUMX / Techno
Views: 3774





A-
A+
The results of the combat use of Belarusian-made electronic warfare equipment in Libya not only confirmed their high tactical and technical characteristics, but also will certainly contribute to the promotion of these products on the world market.


Photo mil.ru
Recently, the Turkish government issued a statement accusing Russia of supplying arms to the Libyan National Army (LNA) in defiance of international sanctions. The LNA is fighting against the forces of the Government of National Accord (PNS) of Libya.
According to the Turkish side, the Russian military illegally handed over the KLA “Krasukha-4” electronic warfare systems (EW), with which the LNA units disabled all Turkish-made unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) that were available to the PNS within two weeks.
To refute these allegations, LNA published a photo of the electronic warfare complex, with the "assistance" of which 11 Turkish UAVs belonging to the PNS crashed. Unexpectedly for many experts, this terminator was the R-934UM2 Groza-6 jamming station manufactured in Minsk by KB Radar OJSC, the managing company of the Radar Systems holding company.


Photo bte.by
This EW facility was originally sold by Belarus to the United Arab Emirates, which then, as part of the military assistance to the LNA, transferred the station to armed groups led by Field Marshal Khalifa Khaftar.

What is this station?
As far as one can understand from the manufacturer’s information, “Thunderstorm-6” is designed to search, detect and suppress VHF radio communication lines operating at fixed frequencies and in adaptive and programmed tuning of the operating frequency (AFC and PPRCH).
The station has an expanded operating range of reconnaissance and radio suppression frequencies, and a high total power of radio suppression characters. It forms aimed, obstructive and misinforming interference.
It has features:
detection and radio suppression of radio sources at ground and air objects;
detection, direction finding and positioning of radio frequency sources in the frequency hopping mode with a speed of up to 1000 hops per second, radio suppression of communication lines in frequency hopping mode with a speed of up to 500 hops per second;
simultaneous radio suppression of up to 28 radio communication lines at fixed frequencies.
According to unofficial sources, the range of the Thunderstorm-6 is about 200 km. Its advantages also include a short deployment and coagulation time due to the use of rapidly deployable antenna mast devices and radio stations mounted on a car chassis.

Azerbaijan was the first to buy
For obvious reasons, KB Radar will not unveil the algorithm for using Thunderstorm-6 for electronic countermeasures of UAVs. Therefore, we have to confine ourselves to the considerations expressed by experts in the field of electronic warfare in this regard.
Modern UAVs for solving missions for their intended purpose (reconnaissance, adjustment, target destruction, etc.) are equipped with rather sophisticated electronic equipment (REA). It, providing the drone with wide combat capabilities, at the same time determines its high sensitivity to the effects of organized electronic interference from the outside.
One of the main reasons for this is the need to constantly exchange information with a ground control point and determine the location of UAVs using satellite navigation systems. A large amount of data transmitted in this case requires the presence of active, intensively working radio communication channels, for which it is very difficult to provide the required stealth operation and a high level of reliability.
In this regard, the following devices and systems are among the most vulnerable elements of REA UAVs:
signal receiver of satellite navigation system (s);
devices for obtaining specific information;
radio transmission and reception of specific and telemetric information;
command and navigation radio links with an antenna-feeder device;
command information exchange device;
information exchange device.
The jamming stations, including Thunder-6, are aimed at these vulnerabilities. Its technical characteristics allow you to:
detect UAVs by electronic radiation and track their movement;
detect and suppress UAV control channels from the ground control point and data transmission channels from the UAV to the ground control point;
to effectively suppress the equipment of the UAV's onboard navigation systems (GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou) and replace real navigation data with false ones in order to remove the device from the intended route or force it to crash landing.
This, presumably, was the reason for the failure of all Turkish-made UAVs that were in service with the PNS.

See also:
Belarus takes the lead in electronic warfare market
Interfere with the enemy - half the battle success

According to media reports, Azerbaijan was the first foreign buyer of Thunder-6, which even partially advanced its development and development of serial production. A number of commentators regarded this as recognition of the high technical level of design solutions incorporated in the design of stations of the Thunderstorm family.
And recent events in Libya have confirmed the validity of such a conclusion.
And not only with rockets and rap they have good

[Nikolaevich I]

Quote: Tlauicol

non-contact detonation. shock core?

In fact, the "native" warhead of the 9M114 "Cocon" missile is cumulative ... Although, subsequently, a thermobaric warhead was created ... If memory serves, there is also an improved (tandem-cumulative) anti-tank warhead. !

[Victor_B]

Beautiful!
Well done Belarusians!

[Klingon]

a shot at the "armored object" - a motorbike, with a bulletproof cartonium, and even in the stern - neighing

[voyaka uh]

It is not indicated how the rocket is aimed at the target.
Laser corridor like Cornet’s, or is it different?

[tralflot1832]

Indeed, what did it induce? Why did the Unas fire and forgot not to be used? Except for helicopters.

[Nikolaevich I]

Quote: tralflot1832

Why unas shot and forgot not used? Except for helicopters.

Lord! So, with us and in helicopters, I shot and forgot, not used! Toka are going!

[Zaurbek]

And there is not used

[dvina71]

Quote: tralflot1832

Why unas shot and forgot not used?

GOS? Thermal? In a real battle? .. Better shot already hit ..

[tralflot1832]

Probably the first competent answer to my question! Why ...

[sedoj]

Why unas shot and forgot not used?

Try to forget - he pressed the button, and then thousands flew into the pipe. Sorry. At least run after.

[Nikolaevich I]

Quote: voyaka uh

It is not indicated how the rocket is aimed at the target.
Laser corridor like Cornet’s, or is it different?

Well, if nothing is said about the guidance system, then it remains to be assumed that the old, system ....., native, is left, that is, a semi-automatic radio command! As far as is known, the combined (laser beam + radio command ...) guidance system has a modification of 9M120-1. ,, Attack ,, developed in Russia in the tenths of this century. ...

[kaban7]

Old Man steers.

[avdkrd]

Quote: Tlauicol

non-contact detonation. shock core?

It is more like getting into the roof of the aft part along a gentle path. A miss is shorter. Although I could be wrong. Comments would not hurt. If the core, then the hit should provide a defeat in the central part of the roof. The warhead operation algorithm must have a reference point (frontal projection) or the gos should see the entire upper projection. In addition, for the formation of an impact core, a distance of at least a meter is needed.

[loki565]

The video shows that the cumulative stream has gone into the field. Impact core explodes wrong, typical example of Bill 2

[Nikolaevich I]

,, Bill-2 ,, doesn’t have a shock core ,,! This ammunition is equipped with two cumulative charges ... leading and main ...

[Nikolaevich I]

Externally, the Bill 2 rocket is practically no different from the Bill rocket.

To defeat targets equipped with dynamic protection, a missile uses a warhead consisting of two cumulative charges that fire down when a rocket spans over a tank.

The warhead also includes:

• optical target sensor;

• magnetic target sensor;

• contact and non-contact fuses.

The optical sensor determines the distance from the rocket to the surface below it, while simultaneously determining its contours. The magnetic sensor determines the distinguishing characteristics of possible targets in order to distinguish a target corresponding to the embedded algorithms among other metal objects.

To hit different types of targets, several shooting modes are used:

• destruction mode of the main battle tanks;

• mode of damage to light armored vehicles;

• destruction mode of unarmored vehicles;

• damage regime for dugouts, long-term firing structures, etc.

The choice of mode is carried out by a switch installed on the left side of the launcher, before the launch of the rocket.

The defeat of targets is carried out by the warhead of a rocket, consisting of two cumulative charges. The first charge of 80 mm caliber was borrowed from a grenade launcher AT-4 and installed at an angle of 100 ° relative to the longitudinal axis of the ATGM. The second charge with a caliber of 105 mm is installed at an angle of 90 ° to the longitudinal axis of the rocket. The charges fire alternately after a certain time when the missile flies over the target, while cumulative jets of both charges get to the same point. This, according to the specialists of the Bofors company, ensures penetration of armor in the upper part of any modern tank, including one equipped with dynamic protection.This is especially for the "especially gifted mind below the belt ..." minus players!

[Hermann]

This is the shock core (what you described), it is also formed from a cumulative charge.
In a cumulative charge, in the explosion at a certain distance from the armor, the cumulative effect is impaired. It takes 1-1.5 meters to form a shock nucleus.

[Nikolaevich I]

Quote: Herman

This is the shock core (what you described), it is also formed from a cumulative charge.
In a cumulative charge, in the explosion at a certain distance from the armor, the cumulative effect is impaired. It takes 1-1.5 meters to form a shock nucleus.

The shaped charge "from which the" shock core "is formed ..." is called SPS or EFP according to ,, western ,,! Where, at least once, was the abbreviation EFP used in descriptions of the "Bill-2" ATGM? A shaped charge can be triggered at a distance from the armor ... usually the distance does not exceed 1 meter ... "Nuclear shock" ammunition, usually "monobloc"! In the "Bill" 2 shaped charges are used: the leading and the main ... which are designed to "hit" at one point! Exactly as in the "conventional" tandem-cumulative ammunition! The leading 80 mm shaped charge was taken from the AT-4 grenade launcher ... This is a shaped charge (!) Grenade! (google the AT-4 grenade launcher!) Next ... look at what excess over the line of sight the ATGM sighting equipment is calculated for! No more than 1 meter! Just 1 meter, which I already mentioned! In the performance of EFP ammunition, the "liner" material has a special meaning! Often people try to use tantalum or tantalum-copper alloy! In cumulative ammunition, usually by default, copper is assumed ... moreover, so often that sometimes it may not be mentioned! And once again "further" ... "cumulative jets of both charges hit the same point! Not" shock nuclei ", but" cumulative jets "," Karl "!

[Hermann]

"The BILL 2 is armed with a pair of vertically striking Explosively Formed Penetrator." Actually, as you said, EFP i.e. shock core, just opened the English Wikipedia.

[Nikolaevich I]

But hasn't this happened "with us" too, when the journalists of "near-war" magazines heard the "ringing", but "not knowing where he is"; that is, without thoroughly understanding the essence of the material received, they begin to freely interpret the "heard" terms, placing them where they please !? Maybe you gave an example of an incorrect (erroneous) phrase? How do you explain the fact that, in fact, a cumulative (!) Grenade from an AT-1 grenade launcher was used as the leading shaped charge? 4. ATGM "Bill", for example, can attack an armored target in the "forehead" with the triggering of a contact fuse (!) ... how is this possible, if, according to your own words, a distance of at least 2-1 m is needed to form a "shock core "? 1,5. Why is the excess of the distance above the line of sight no more than 3-0,6 m (that is, the ATGM must fly over the target no higher than 1 meter ...), which is within the maximum tolerance for shaped charges?

[Hermann]

Even at a short distance, the cumulative charge loses its effectiveness (which is why rubber screens and metal grilles are placed on armored vehicles), only lightly armored targets (charges look down), the leading charge from the AT-4 is apparently sufficient to remove d / z from the roof, in a mine The TM-83 lining is also copper, but this does not prevent her from punching the T-72 through the side.
By the way, EFP is often called simply a cumulative charge (the impact core itself is simply a variation of it).

[Nikolaevich I]

TM 83 does not interfere with penetrating DZ armor and a "monoblock" EFP charge is installed there ... as well as on SPBE "Motiv", KSTAM-II tank shells, "Polynege" ... That is, EFP charges do not need a leading charge for "removing" DZ! The "Staff" projectile has 2 identical (!) EFP charges so that at least one can hit the target ... the TOW-2B has 2, almost identical (!) EFP charges, to hit 2 (!) Points on an armored vehicle (engine and turret)! ... That is, even one EFP charge is enough to hit the target, regardless of DZ like BOPS! Usually, for an EFP charge, as well as for BOPS, a leading charge is not required to "remove" DZ! Why is the "Bill" used a leading charge? Why are they used different-caliber charges (leading and main), as in the "usual" tandem-cumulative warhead?

[Hermann]

Yes, here you are right, the leading charge is not for removing the d / z. Why are the charges on the "Bill" different? Maybe two missiles of the same size just didn't fit.

[Nikolaevich I]

Well, that did not fit .... here it is unlikely ... We would like, squeezed in! (as a whole, Bill's scheme does not reject that ...) Identical functions of "different-caliber" charges are hardly possible! (If a 105-mm charge still fulfills the desired function, then why on earth can an 80-mm charge be able to do this? And if it cannot, then nafik is needed? Only then it makes sense if different (!) Charges have different functions! These different (!) Functions are mentioned in the descriptions of "Bill-2"! ...: 1.leading (!) Charge (one function!) ... 2.main charge (another function!) ...!

[Doccor18]

modernized 9M114MB anti-tank missile ...

Tested on MTLB ... Decommissioned tank was not found or something ...

[Avior]

Looks like a miss.
And zhovto - black marking on a rocket what does it mean?

[The leader of the Redskins]

And it was specially pasted in order to tease couch patriots / funeral workers in VO)))