A second Tu-214PU aircraft was built in Kazan for the Rossiya SLO

At the Kazan Aviation Plant (KAZ) named after S.P. Gorbunov completed the construction of the second Tu-214PU aircraft in the configuration "control point" for the FSBI "Special Flight Unit" (SLO) "Russia" of the Office of the President of the Russian Federation.

It is reported that this aircraft (registration number RA-64532) made its first flight from the airport of the Kazan aircraft factory on June 19, 2020 and became the first Tu-214 aircraft built in the past year and a half. On July 8 of this year, the Ulyanovsk JSC Spectrum Avia announced the completion of the painting of this Tu-214PU aircraft in the livery of the SLO Rossiya.

The first Tu-214PU aircraft, built for the SLO Russia under the 2017 contract, made its first flight on December 28, 2018 and was handed over to the customer in the summer of 2019.

According to the blog, in March 2017, UAC and Rostec entered into an agreement for the supply of three Tu-214 aircraft in the Tu-214PU configuration for the Rossiya SLO. At that time, all three Tu-214 aircraft were at the Kazan Aviation Plant in the initial stage of construction.

Today, the SLO Russia has at its disposal 15 Tu-214 aircraft of various modifications and four Tu-204 aircraft.

To date, a total of 32 Tu-214 aircraft have been built at the Kazan Aircraft Plant, and the total number of built vehicles of the Tu-204 / Tu-214 family built in the USSR and Russia since 1989, together with prototypes, amounted to 86 units.

Comments

[credo]

Such a nice "drying" and domestic engines are worth it, but why is it not sold to domestic airlines along with a "superjet" for the transportation of ordinary citizens?

[svp67]

Quote: credo

Such a cute "drying"

"Carcass" ... still, because she is the "granddaughter" of the Tu-154 ...

[donavi49]

They sell, even discounts promise and leasing. But they want a whole 0. Without service, without procedures, without training, without statistics, with obviously much worse economic indicators (not only fuel, but the same average planned daily raid) no one needs it even below cost.

[credo]

Quote: donavi49

They sell, even discounts promise and leasing. But they want a whole 0. Without service, without procedures, without training, without statistics, with obviously much worse economic indicators (not only fuel, but the same average planned daily raid) no one needs it even below cost.

But what about the SLO "... without service, without procedures, without training, without statistics, with obviously the worst indicators ..." bought the TU-214, despite the fact that they carry not ordinary people, but VIP?

[Pereira]

Apparently, there is no need to count money.
I would like to know how the SLO reports in the tax? With profit or loss?

[Svetlana]

They live off the collected taxes and therefore do not pay taxes and do not report to the tax.
That is, of course, there is some kind of reporting, but not before the tax.

[Pereira]

Here I am about that. I see the dignity of an airplane in one - completely mine. Money is not important.

[Piramidon]

Quote: Pereira

I would like to know how the SLO reports in the tax?

About the same as the military. The tax has nothing to do with them.

[hagen]

Quote: Piramidon

About the same as the military. The tax has nothing to do with them.

In order not to carry nonsense, you just need to press a couple of buttons, and ....
"..... Organization FEDERAL STATE BUDGETARY INSTITUTION" SPECIAL AIRCRAFT SQUAD "RUSSIA" OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION DEPARTMENT from Moscow on which in the Tax Statement service you can get an extract from the EDS or check the organization for reliability and payment to our database of firms INN 7732537999, OGRN 1097746322156 and the official office of the company is located at 119027, Moscow, Vnukovo district, Reisovaya str. 1, d 2. You can also find out information about registration with the tax office and the date of creation of the company, information on registration with the Pension Fund and the FSS, the profit of the organization and the balance sheet of the FGBU "SLO" RUSSIA "according to Rosstat, affiliates of the Federal State Budgetary Institution, the full name of the director and founders and their participation in the management of third-party companies, company details, the actual address of the location of the founder, the main type of activity and additional OKVED codes. With data for checking the organization by TIN and information aboutFSBI "SLO" RUSSIA "can be found below or immediately order a paid extract in the form of a pdf document with an electronic signature to your mail ...."
More details: https://vypiska-nalog.com/reestr/7732537999-fgbu-slo-rossiya

[Piramidon]

Quote: Hagen

In order not to carry nonsense

Can you do without boorish tone? Just give a link and say - "You are wrong"

[hagen]

Well, sorry. Did not want ... I thought that before public approval, checking the information is accessible and possible to a person with any level of training. This is obvious to me.

[donavi49]

Well, that’s SLO. Drops on board for a month - while waiting for the details? Well, nothing, the other is always in reserve. To train pilots - well, the budget and the budget will pay. What questions? Here, any plane will fly without problems. In the first place, rather, prestige - its own, well, the increased content of domestic components (especially key or smart ones - where functional bookmarks are possible).

[Cyril G ...]

The Air Force buys them as scouts

[KCA]

They have a raid of 2 drops per year, there is time in a hurry to carry out maintenance, repairs, wait a month for spare parts, for pre-flight and after-flight maintenance, well, let’s have 3 flight departures per month for flight and ground personnel, the cost is not important , precisely because it is not ordinary people who are transported, that's where the previous Malaysian Boeing went and why? Missing, as in the Bermuda Triangle, no rustle, no peep, no debris, and if so the plane with Putin and Shoigu disappear from the radar?

[Tavrik]

In the Arctic Ocean, the aircraft does not need to make a profit. You need to spend money allocated from the budget.

[aybolyt678]

Quote: donavi49

with obviously significantly worse economic performance

why would it be the worst? Soviet planes are worse than Boeing only because there is not enough tank before America, the volume is small, and the sound is a little louder. Tu 154 on safety in general is much ahead.
I believed these tales about import efficiency until I bought a foreign car myself. Russian nines are more economical than Toyota.

[donavi49]

The PS-90 engine, as it were, is even worse than the P-R / PV even of the previous generation, not only in fuel, but also in checks, and a check - this plane is idle and causes losses.
The LEAP or 1000 series (which they buy for the MS by the way) is a new generation.

Next, we go further - the ideology of service. What A / B do according to the procedure overnight (and they really fit) - Tu will do 3 days according to the same procedure, and if something is not found, then it will become stuck for a week without airworthiness. What A / B is done in 8-12 days - Tu does 20 days according to the procedure, but it’s real and stuck for a month. D - A / B is made at the base service point, and Tu is done only at the repair plant.

Idle aircraft = losses. Again, without revealing the trouble with the details, from which the sides sway mercilessly, where they are in operation. Because no company can afford to wait two weeks for a detail.

Next is the peak and recommended raid (or rather, the number of flights per watch). In Tu it is much lower than in A / B. Again - an airplane standing on the ground in an inter-flight check generates only losses.

Further - on the A / B, a bunch of pilots with certificates and a touch, invite, interview, hire, although I didn’t like hiring another there tomorrow. On the Tu-204/14 it is necessary to personally train pilots, spend money. Again, if he mows, then firing him will have to cook a new one for denyushka.

Similarly with the staff. And the whole economy needs to be recounted. And there will be problems with loans - because banks also do not really believe.

[aybolyt678]

And now, the construction of aircraft is an industry, ranging from titanium with aluminum, a bunch of factories, ending with an educational institution with a professorship. About electronics, navigation, I generally keep quiet.
having a closed training cycle of everything, the country generally wins ... and not just the company leasing aircraft. With the right state approach, with executions of the guilty, we would all sing together:
"we were born to make a fairy tale come true,
overcome space and space
the mind gave us wings of steel hands ...... "

[Narak-zempo]

Why, once the domestic plane, then immediately

Quote: donavi49

Without service, without procedures, without training

Are you sure about that?
And about

Quote: donavi49

without statistics

so it is being put into operation, right?

[donavi49]

Yes. Aeroflot suffered with Ilami. The few Tu-204s delivered did not really fly into the AK and, after their bankruptcy or redemption, the first thing they threw out the remaining Tu-154/204. SSS is a key factor in the collapse of international promotion in that the service did not work out. As a result, Interjet disassembled most of the fleet into parts.
According to flightradar24, only six SSJ100s from Interjet fleet continue to fly. Seven more do not fly for more than a year, five stand from the fall of 2018, three from December 2018 to January 2019, and the last from March 2019.

Taking planes for dismantling is a bad idea even at a used market (civilian).


Training and procedures are developed only on the basis of the availability of aircraft physically. If one AK buys 10 planes, then everything will be extremely expensive. If we are talking about 100 boards, then you can already think of something and even a special basic service point can pay off.

[Pavel57]

For a long time even Aeroflot was ready to buy 204 with RR. But it did not add up due to the fault of the manufacturer. Red Wings was ready to take 204. But the price did not agree.

[businessv]

Quote: donavi49

But they want a whole 0. Without service, without procedures, without training, without statistics, with obviously much worse economic indicators (not only fuel, but also the same average planned daily raid) no one needs it even below cost.

Why then is it produced in such a configuration ?! All the shortcomings that you listed can be corrected, or is it impossible?

[donavi49]

Support pants factory + in the Arctic Ocean, these disadvantages are not significant, because it is not a commercial AK.

[Servisinzhener]

Do not take. It is inferior to similar foreign aircraft when operating on economic indicators. Even though it costs less. And in the Arctic Ocean in the first place is not economics, but reliability in the broad sense of the word. Minimal use of foreign components. especially when it comes to the control room.

[donavi49]

Minimal use of foreign components. especially when it comes to the control room.

They fly 100% foreign sides if that.

[Harry.km]

Quote: Servisinzhener

especially when it comes to the control room.

For PU, its engines are exactly two times less than necessary)))
Yes, such tasks are the IL-96 ...

[aybolyt678]

Quote: Servisinzhener

Even though it's cheaper

It costs more because it’s new. And foreign boeing only bu.

[loki565]

Superjet is significantly better by flight / economic indicators, it would be better to replace French engines)))

[slipped]

Quote: loki565

Superjet is significantly better by flight / economic indicators, it would be better to replace French engines)))

Superjet - short-haul, it is not suitable for PU. But the MS-21 with PD-14 is perfect, but it requires a touch and regular operation. Well, the maximum import substitution of course.

[Never mind]

In our city, the safest plane was assembled, to this day they fly, smoothly turned virtuous into Auchan! Well done Kazan.

[L-39NG]

What a joy! Will there be a public holiday, with a salute? And the distribution of state awards? Although, awards are distributed among the partners.

[Vladimir61]

Quote: L-39NG

What a joy! Will there be a public holiday, with a salute?

Yapping? And again to the booth!

[sevryuk]

The son of an officer ...

[Vestovo]

In Tatarstan, many technological manufactures are located ..
So, of course, well done! And if suddenly "a friend suddenly turned out to be" V. Vysotsky .. Info the war continues

[Imperial Technocrat]

______Beautiful

[Serpet]

Who needs it, except for SLO ...

[Olegi1]

Quote: credo

Quote: donavi49

They sell, even discounts promise and leasing. But they want a whole 0. Without service, without procedures, without training, without statistics, with obviously much worse economic indicators (not only fuel, but the same average planned daily raid) no one needs it even below cost.

But what about the SLO "... without service, without procedures, without training, without statistics, with obviously the worst indicators ..." bought the TU-214, despite the fact that they carry not ordinary people, but VIP?

Because for boards of this purpose, ONLY domestic avionics / equipment is allowed. For transportation of first persons - similarly.

[Whirlwind]

In the Soviet Union, three planes were produced every day, and budget revenues from sales of aircraft were comparable to oil revenues.
Now the civilian aircraft industry in the pen, but this is a fee for the loss of sovereignty.
Without a sovereign Central Bank and, accordingly, a sovereign ruble and a loan, we will invest in Boeing and Airbus until some further sanctions of the crazy West ...

[boris]

Again old songs about how bad and uneconomical Soviet /
Russian aircraft. In fact, this, as they said before,
"enemy propaganda". And this is not a figure of speech. Speaking of which
about economic indicators, you need to consider everything in a complex.
In this complex, the issue of fuel economy is not so
important as comrades like donavi49 say. The thing is,
that Russia has its own oil and there is a lot of it. Further. Import aircraft
so expensive that their vaunted fuel economy is not
pays for this difference in the purchase price, operating costs
Ki, the cost of training crews and other personnel (self
themselves abroad). There are direct and irrefutable ones
evidence. For example, the availability of air travel for
ordinary citizens. As an example. With very "evil more-
vikah "and backward IL-62, TU-154 and IL-86 air ticket on the route
Tashkent-Moscow was less than a quarter of my monthly salary.
Today, this ratio is closer to the reciprocal. With such
hands me, as a potential passenger, deeply violet-
how many people are in the crew and what are in the pilot's cabin
super duper color displays. Another important (actually
the most important) issue is flight safety. And here at the western
Airplanes are not doing so well (ultra-modern Boeing). Lot
one can still say, I will turn to the main thing - what is the progress then?

[boris]

For Ivanovich-2.
In vain, ironic about the enemies. At least one was seen alive.
It was around 2003. TAPOiCH handed over IL-114 for
National airline of Uzbekistan. This gentleman (worker
airlines) as soon as I could under any pretext
slowed down the acceptance. All the same, this plane (and a few more
copies of the same type) were accepted. A little later this
Mr. received a term, but on other matters. Then these
aircraft for several years quite successfully operated.
Now about oil. As you know, western planes are bought
not for rubles, but for currency. In turn, the currency in Russia
appears from the sale of this very oil, gas and other
raw materials. Try to calculate how much oil you need to sell.
(or gas or wheat) to buy one plane. By
about the subsidies for air travel in Soviet times
one digit. As of the mid-80s, Aeroflot
bought one TU-154 for about 8 million domestic
rubles. That is, he could work successfully without subsidies.
Now the question is: how much is fine today
modern A320? This type carries about as much
same passengers.

[Joker62]

Quote: Ivanovich-2

This is not what I wrote to you. And the fact that the SSJ chassis are not designed for structural strength.
And if they are calculated, then with an error.

Friend! Woe couch expert, do not drive the blizzard here about the chassis with an error in strength.
To do this, there is a Center for Static Testing (CSI), there they are checked for everything - from the chassis to all the elements of the fuselage. And they work out every finished product to complete destruction. In addition, during the test, all miscalculations are revealed, if any. Without a conclusion from the CSI, more than one plane and a helicopter will not give permission for production! Is that clear to you? Or do you want to drive the blizzard, like Ekperst sofa?
I myself am an aircraft manufacturer, and I know what it is and a lot of things. Go learn the materiel, especially as Sopromat!