Military Review

The construction of the lead icebreaker of project 10510 Leader has begun at SSK Zvezda

60
The construction of the lead icebreaker of project 10510 Leader has begun at SSK Zvezda

In the Big Stone of Primorsky Krai at the Zvezda shipbuilding complex, construction of the lead large linear atomic icebreaker of project 10510 (LK-120Ya, code "Leader") has begun. The steel cutting ceremony for the icebreaker was held on July 6 at the Zvezda hull production unit.


The contract for the construction of the Leader project’s lead atomic icebreaker, dubbed “Russia,” was signed between the Zvezda shipbuilding complex and the Atomflot FSUE on April 23, 2020. The state customer of the icebreaker is Rosatom State Corporation. The first icebreaker of project 10510 will go into operation in 2027. All three icebreakers of this project should be put into operation before 2033.

As previously reported, in total it is planned to build three icebreakers of the new project. In January of this year, the Russian government allocated 2020 billion rubles from the federal budget for the construction of the lead icebreaker from 2027 to 127,576979. Funds have not yet been found for the construction of two other icebreakers of the series, but there is still time, their laying is scheduled for 2023.

Icebreakers "Leader" will be designed for year-round pilotage of large-tonnage cargo ships along the Northern Sea Route.

According to the project, the total displacement of the new icebreakers will be 71,4 thousand tons with a length of 209 meters, a width of 47,7 meters and a height of 20,3 meters. The ship will receive two RITM-400 nuclear reactors with a capacity of 120 megawatts on propellers and a thermal capacity of 315 megawatts each.

As the developers of the project from the St. Petersburg Iceberg Central Design Bureau stated, the Leader icebreaker will be able to reach speeds of up to 24 knots in clean water and up to 12 knots on ice up to 2 meters thick. The maximum overcome ice thickness is 4 meters. The service life of such an icebreaker is designed for 40 years. The crew is 127 people. The autonomy of the icebreaker in terms of provisions will be 8 months.
Photos used:
LLC “Shipbuilding complex“ Zvezda ”
60 comments
Ad

The editorial board of Voenniy Obozreniye urgently needs a proofreader. Requirements: impeccable knowledge of the Russian language, diligence, discipline. Contact: [email protected]

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Alien From
    Alien From 7 July 2020 12: 54 New
    19
    Big ship, great sailing)))) seven feet under the keel !!
    1. Fan
      Fan 7 July 2020 17: 30 New
      +3
      Quote: Alien From
      Big ship, great sailing)))) seven feet under the keel !!

      So far, they have only laid it, but I hope they will not pull it with the construction .. They have laid a serious ship! Well, God help shipbuilders .. hi
      1. Rzzz
        Rzzz 8 July 2020 09: 06 New
        -3
        Quote: Ventilator
        .. a serious ship laid

        Only, I'm afraid, completely useless. The costs of construction and operation will be space, and the economic return is minimal.
  2. antivirus
    antivirus 7 July 2020 12: 54 New
    +1
    According to the project, the total displacement of new icebreakers will be 71,4 thousand tons with a length of 209 meters, a width of 47,7 meters and a height of 20,3 meters

    -this is the answer about the priorities before aircraft carriers ... and also 70 tons of VI; not to me, but to the Kremlin, claims ..... "pushers" of Yaroslavl paints ...

    there’s money for the right things .. always
    1. AU Ivanov.
      AU Ivanov. 7 July 2020 13: 10 New
      13
      Impressive 12 knots on two-meter ice.
    2. mvg
      mvg 7 July 2020 14: 55 New
      0
      and also 70 000 t VI

      The cost of the hull is 15-18% of the price tag of a warship. South Korea container ships of 300 tons dozens rivets. The most expensive is a weapon, as always.
      1. kig
        kig 8 July 2020 02: 22 New
        0
        There are no container ships of 300 tons each. But otherwise you are right.
  3. rocket757
    rocket757 7 July 2020 12: 55 New
    +3
    Build is GOOD!
    We will see when this MIRACLE will be built.
    1. Fan
      Fan 7 July 2020 17: 32 New
      +2
      Quote: rocket757
      Build is GOOD!
      We will see when this MIRACLE will be built.

      It should be beautiful "icebreaker" and the power is impressive.
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 7 July 2020 20: 03 New
        0
        WE NEED! The longest coastline with us, with a limited time / season, is passable for ships. Not an order.
  4. And Makarov
    And Makarov 7 July 2020 13: 04 New
    20
    Yes, we have no equal in icebreakers.
    By the way, yesterday the laying of the sixth Aframax took place.
    1. tralflot1832
      tralflot1832 7 July 2020 13: 22 New
      +6
      Six slipways are occupied, how much is still free. Good ferry. From experience. Stralsund is gaining one, One in the hangar .. Delivery every 4 months. But the tonnage of Stralsund and Zvezda is not comparable. By the way, Afromaxa builds a ship from Astrakhan. Leading engineer. Even transporting a beloved cat transport paid. I’m completely satisfied. She wants to realize her ambitions. Well done. But logistics?
      1. aftbreeze
        aftbreeze 7 July 2020 16: 58 New
        0
        What are you speaking about? Misunderstood!
        1. tralflot1832
          tralflot1832 7 July 2020 20: 40 New
          0
          Specialists were gathered from all over the former Soviet Union. 100% are sure from Ukraine and the Baltic states too.
      2. Interlocutor
        Interlocutor 7 July 2020 19: 01 New
        +1
        But the logistics?

        Our country is big. There have always been problems with logistics, but it does not matter. The main thing good things are done.
    2. Courier
      Courier 7 July 2020 13: 37 New
      -11
      In Korea held?
      1. Nastia makarova
        Nastia makarova 7 July 2020 14: 24 New
        +3
        Troll in Russia
        1. NOMADE
          NOMADE 7 July 2020 14: 36 New
          +3
          Itself such) I live in Vladivostok and often go to B.K., above, the person was partly right. The first Afromaxes were in fact / will be assembled at the shipyard from most (aft with engines, etc.) from a kit from South Korea .. We built the bow + connected everything) PS Look at the contracts with the shipyards)
          The entire production / logistics chain is not ready for a full production cycle.
          According to Leader, the news is excellent, so there really is a great chance that a plant for the production of "large-format" ship sheet metal will be built, this is a problem at the moment. It was discussed earlier, as there is a problem with the delivery of such rolled metal. + the rest of the sections will be completed.
          Therefore, you should not call everyone trolls and sacredly believe all statements!)
          1. Nastia makarova
            Nastia makarova 7 July 2020 15: 00 New
            +3
            better let them collect from us than generally ready to buy in Korea
          2. NEXUS
            NEXUS 7 July 2020 15: 40 New
            0
            Quote: NOMADE
            According to the Leader, the news is great, so there really is a great chance,

            An interesting question - will the Leader be a dual-purpose icebreaker, as it was in the USSR, or will it be a completely "civilian" ship?
            1. NOMADE
              NOMADE 7 July 2020 15: 46 New
              +1
              Good question, displacement, dimensions, power plant allow you to make reserves)
              But it is embarrassing that the shipyard essentially belongs to Rosneft.
              Although the way in which partly useful lobbies are invested in it and in some century (as an example, quotas for crab producers will now be issued subject to the construction of a mining fleet in Russia) inspires cautious optimism
              1. Eldorado
                Eldorado 7 July 2020 16: 11 New
                +3
                Quote: NOMADE
                Good question, displacement, dimensions, power plant allow you to make reserves)
                But it is embarrassing that the shipyard essentially belongs to Rosneft.
                Although the way in which partly useful lobbies are invested in it and in some century (as an example, quotas for crab producers will now be issued subject to the construction of a mining fleet in Russia) inspires cautious optimism

                There, not only an icebreaker is already being built, but a closed floating dock for SSBNs of the Borey Pacific Fleet project, which are based in Vilyuchinsk, is almost ready.
                1. NOMADE
                  NOMADE 7 July 2020 16: 36 New
                  0
                  Well, about the floating dock which is "almost ready", I would not be so categorical ..) Photo for May ..
                  Damn, I can’t attach it from the phone.
                  Here is the link to the photo

                  https://i.imgur.com/sjZyDsW.jpg
              2. Eldorado
                Eldorado 7 July 2020 16: 13 New
                +1
                Quote: NOMADE
                Good question, displacement, dimensions, power plant allow you to make reserves)
                But it is embarrassing that the shipyard essentially belongs to Rosneft.
                Although the way in which partly useful lobbies are invested in it and in some century (as an example, quotas for crab producers will now be issued subject to the construction of a mining fleet in Russia) inspires cautious optimism

                In theory, the cannon and containers with "Calibers" are not a problem to deliver.
                1. Rzzz
                  Rzzz 9 July 2020 21: 12 New
                  -2
                  Quote: El Dorado
                  cannon and containers with "Caliber" n

                  What for? Penguin scare? Where this ship will be used, no other can.
                  And substituting under enemy fire is a stupid idea. The target is huge, it’s difficult to miss. In terms of power, it will be no worse than Chernobyl, especially considering the fact that reactors using highly enriched fuel - after all, they can also smell when damaged.
              3. tralflot1832
                tralflot1832 7 July 2020 20: 44 New
                +1
                Krabolovs will build even in Karelia. They themselves were stunned by such a contract !!!
            2. tralflot1832
              tralflot1832 7 July 2020 21: 00 New
              +1
              The answer will always be dual-purpose. Non-cretic winches are removed from the foundation and what is needed at that moment is put in their place. Everything is done very quickly. In 2000, the owner of the Murmansk shipyard shouted out what to do with the stock of weapons at the shipyard. big.
          3. kig
            kig 8 July 2020 02: 45 New
            +1
            Quote: NOMADE
            The whole production chain is not ready

            With tankers, this is just understandable, if you keep in mind that the shipbuilding enterprise, in fact, is exactly what it is doing that assembles a steamer from cubes and components that are made by someone else at other factories and in other countries. Almost all the equipment for a tanker is made in Korea, and if something is produced in other countries, then a supply chain has already been established there. So the assembly of tanker sections at Hyundai factories looks logical. Confused only by our willingness to hang the tag "made by us" and notify the whole world about it. Although people hawala. The icebreaker is a different matter, here at least the power plant will be completely domestic. And it is also embarrassing that the Star, in fact, has not yet produced anything on its own, and suddenly such a grandiose project. Well, even 7 years ahead.
  5. Fungus
    Fungus 7 July 2020 13: 13 New
    16
    Putin "shattered" shipbuilding. We build mega-ships at new factories.
    1. Eldorado
      Eldorado 7 July 2020 16: 17 New
      +7
      Quote: Fungus
      Putin "shattered" shipbuilding. We build mega-ships at new factories.

      Yes, the end of Russian shipbuilding has long come. Yesterday another Aframax was laid down with an icebreaker, last week the Akademik Lomonosov PATEK reached full capacity, and the newest SSBN Knyaz Vladimir moved to Gadzhievo to serve.
      Shipbuilding ruins Putin, ruins ...
      1. Angelo Provolone
        Angelo Provolone 8 July 2020 00: 07 New
        -2
        To lay is not to build.
        It was under Putin that the Vladivostok Shipyard was cut. In place of the 178th Shipyard, the embankment of the Cesarevich is now. In general, it was under him and under Yeltsin that all shipbuilding and ship repair went to China and Korea. Asians are still tumbling with the happiness thrown by him, including Putin. And your patriotic moans - this is for every sneeze.
        I understand that the development of the industry as a whole has an effect for the whole country and for every citizen. This is reflected in the well-being of every citizen. This is felt by everyone, including materially. But I don’t understand, they will spit out some kind of icebreaker, God forbid, once every 10 years. Well, what does it matter to you. Not for you personally, but for "you" who read such news? Well, why are you mad? Do you enjoy looking at these Teletubbies? Or is it nice to realize how much such a center will be simplified on a fragile secretary, until he is trampled for incompetence and theft? Hooray! Hooray!
        1. Simargl
          Simargl 8 July 2020 07: 56 New
          0
          Quote: Angelo Provolone
          But I don’t understand, some kind of icebreaker will spit it out, God forbid once every 10 years.
          In fact, the nuclear icebreakers themselves have not been built for almost 25 years. But now 3 are lowered and are being completed, and one, about which in the article, is laid down.
          Icebreaking ships were built, and not one in 10 years.
          How many atomic icebreakers do you think? These 3 will replace, in the near future, the old people of project 10520, who almost all went to recycling ...
    2. Rzzz
      Rzzz 9 July 2020 21: 53 New
      0
      Quote: Fungus
      We are building mega-ships at new plants.

      If you still know with what quality, from what materials, and how much with crooked hands, it will become sad. And if you imagine that a ship with two Chernobyls on board will also be done through the ass - you would like to dump somewhere on another globe.
  6. Trevis
    Trevis 7 July 2020 13: 43 New
    +3
    Great news! Good luck!
  7. Doccor18
    Doccor18 7 July 2020 13: 58 New
    +3
    This is "icebreaker"! Over 70 thousand tons !!! Finally, the NSR will start operating all year round.
    1. Rzzz
      Rzzz 9 July 2020 21: 20 New
      -3
      Quote: Doccor18
      Finally, the NSR will begin to work year-round

      Do you have any idea of ​​the scale of the NSR? In order for it to work "all year round" such icebreakers need about fifty.
      And this (one thing) is needed in order to withdraw Rosneft tankers, Gas carriers of Gazprom, and Norilsk Nickel bulk carriers from the polar ports in winter so that the flow of dough does not deplete budget Fuck there, not in the budget, but in corporate income.
      That is why it was so famously laid and will be actively built.
      1. Doccor18
        Doccor18 9 July 2020 23: 04 New
        +1
        Do you have any idea of ​​the scale of the NSR? In order for it to work "all year round" such icebreakers need about fifty. 

        Imagine the scale. And not bad.
        For year-round operation of the NSR with 250-300 ice wires, 8 atomic icebreakers with a capacity of 80-120 MW and 10 non-nuclear icebreakers with a capacity of 20-30 MW., As well as 10-15 non-nuclear icebreakers with a capacity of 10-20 MW, are required.
        In total: 8 atomic and 25 non-nuclear modern icebreakers are capable of ensuring year-round cargo transportation of 10 million tons.
        There is little left and the NSR will work in full force. And there is no alternative to it.
        1. Rzzz
          Rzzz 9 July 2020 23: 07 New
          0
          Quote: Doccor18
          And there is no alternative to it.

          Alternatives for what ??
          1. Doccor18
            Doccor18 9 July 2020 23: 13 New
            +1
            For the shortest route from Europe to Asia.
            1. Rzzz
              Rzzz 9 July 2020 23: 51 New
              0
              Quote: Doccor18
              For the shortest route from Europe to Asia.

              Firstly, the Northern Sea Route is NOT the shortest way from Asia to Europe. If you do not believe balabolami, like me, then you can easily find many resources that consider it.
              Well, unless of course you need the Murmansk-Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky route, the truth is shorter there. And from China, where most of the goods are made, in short via Suez.
              Now let's take it.
              10 megatons of cargo flow, in terms of the average ship 100 thousand tons - a hundred ships.
              Follow on.
              8 atomic ships and 25 non-nuclear ones need to be built. It is very expensive. Dohreniliard money.
              They must be exploited - it is also very expensive. Especially nuclear - fuel extraction, its manufacture, delivery, all safety measures, reloading of reactors, storage of spent nuclear fuel for the next hundred years until they figure out how to process it. Disposal of nuclear ships themselves after their service life. Regular repair of steamboats, and they will require frequent repair during intensive work in ice. Training of specialists who need to be motivated by high salaries (a specific profession, do not change work).
              Well, in general, just try to imagine the level of expenditures of this icebreaker, it’s terrible.
              Now we need to think what income we will cover these costs. Only two options are seen here.
              1. Throw everything on the budget. He is big, he will endure. In an extreme case, there is one specialist who knows what to "hold on" for when there is no money. For the rest of the budget, you can shoot videos "made by us".
              2. Divide all costs into the same hundred ships a year. Yes, even two hundred ships a year. It will cost ONLY icebreaking service. Add pilot, lighthouse, weather, ice reconnaissance, parking. And in fact, the movement itself, even a schoolboy understands that in the wormwood behind the icebreaker fuel consumption will be greater, and the speed less. Less speed means a longer flight, more pay must be paid. We must wait for the ice caravan, the same time. We have to wait for favorable weather. It is necessary to protect the cargo from low temperatures, if you are afraid !!!
              And a cherry on the cake - it’s necessary to build ice class ships. More expensive, more metal, less payload, more power reserve, more fuel should be carried instead of payload. Plus, and specific environmental requirements now, it is necessary to put the appropriate equipment.
              Now put yourself in the shoes of a shipowner or shipper. Where would you say "well, it's on" ???
              1. Doccor18
                Doccor18 10 July 2020 10: 19 New
                0
                You said a lot correctly, but ... The NSR is primarily a project for the Fatherland. Without the development of the NSR there will be no development of the Russian North. And he, this north, is GIANT. And the oil fields of Western Siberia are coming to an end, you need to move north. NSR is primarily infrastructure. Yes, expensive, yes - difficult. But what do you suggest - abandon the Russian North, because it is unprofitable? It will be cost-effective much later, when the entire infrastructure of the NSR will be established and work like clockwork.
                And another important aspect is security. What can happen to a ship and cargo while it goes through the waters of 30 states, where local wars, pirates, tensions and corrupt border guards and officials ..? And almost the entire route of the NSR is the territory of one country, where everything is calm and sure that the cargo will reach the recipient.
                1. Rzzz
                  Rzzz 11 July 2020 13: 57 New
                  0
                  Quote: Doccor18
                  But what do you suggest - abandon the Russian North, because it is unprofitable?

                  I do not suggest abandoning it. But let those who receive income from the north bear the costs. And it turns out interestingly - NSR due to the treasury, and all the benefits are in the pocket of corporate owners.
                  As for the need to extract oil there, I personally absolutely do not care about this need. I don’t care what kind of gasoline will be in the tank of my car - Russian, Turkmen, Turkish, Iranian or Arabic. Moreover, the Russian one is the most expensive.

                  Quote: Doccor18
                  What can happen to a ship and cargo while it goes through the waters of 30 states, where local wars, pirates, tensions and corrupt border guards and officials ..?

                  Thousands of ships go, and nothing of the sort. Everything is in order with security, the coastal states provide, it is economically important for them. corrupt officials - are eliminated either by keeping the vessel in order so that no inspector gets to the bottom, or by putting a couple of hundred-dollar bills in a folder with problem documents.
  8. Angelo Provolone
    Angelo Provolone 7 July 2020 14: 39 New
    -14
    Tsar - the cannon doesn’t shoot, the king doesn’t ring the bell, the king didn’t fly ...
    A star was built on the Star. He rotted right there on the slipway.
    1. Simargl
      Simargl 7 July 2020 17: 16 New
      +1
      Quote: Angelo Provolone
      Tsar - the cannon doesn’t shoot, the king doesn’t ring the bell, the king didn’t fly ...
      This is because the king of the bourgeoisie was removed from his post tongue
      1. Angelo Provolone
        Angelo Provolone 8 July 2020 06: 57 New
        -1
        The position of "Tsar" - who are you talking about? Bunsha? so he is acting
        1. Simargl
          Simargl 8 July 2020 06: 58 New
          -1
          Quote: Angelo Provolone
          The position of "Tsar" - who are you talking about?
          About the king.
  9. Ros 56
    Ros 56 7 July 2020 16: 25 New
    +3
    However, a healthy boat will turn out and probably with a surprise for the striped. good
  10. aftbreeze
    aftbreeze 7 July 2020 16: 54 New
    +3
    This is a "steamer"! 8 months of autonomy for provisions! Gorgeous!
    1. tralflot1832
      tralflot1832 7 July 2020 21: 07 New
      0
      By the provisions, you don’t keep food in your refrigerator for months. Meat and fish yes. Everything else is bought up every month and delivered on board. The ports were restored to the NSR and there are also supply vessels.
      1. Simargl
        Simargl 8 July 2020 07: 00 New
        -1
        Quote: tralflot1832
        You don’t keep food in your refrigerator for months.
        And where are the potatoes sold?
      2. aftbreeze
        aftbreeze 16 July 2020 13: 12 New
        +1
        I'm in my refrigerator what I want and how much I want to store. Why then write 8 months?
  11. Gray-haired
    Gray-haired 7 July 2020 19: 38 New
    0
    Judging by the faces exhausted by malnutrition, everything to the last copy of Yushechka will be invested ... It's not good to croak, but even without croaking everything is "captured". And the Commander-in-Chief does not have enough strength, although for the sake of truth, they pack every day, and he drags everything.
  12. tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 7 July 2020 22: 20 New
    0
    From Volgodonsk to drag reactors across the whole country. Steel for hulls from the same opera. Railway has limitations in size. That we will rivet the hulls from steel scraps. Iron is definitely the PRC or South Korea. Or it will be necessary to build a steel plant in the Far East.
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 7 July 2020 23: 20 New
      +3
      So now they are going to build
      Petropavlovsk - Ferrous Metallurgy LLC, part of the IRC Limited holding, intends to build a plant for the production of hot briquetted iron (HBI) in the Far East, according to a joint statement of the company and the Far East Agency for Attracting Investments and Export Support (ANO API) following the results investor day in the Jewish Autonomous Region The products can be used as raw materials for steel production at the shipyards of the Far East - SSK "Zvezda", PJSC ASZ, JSC KhSZ.

      A plant for the production of HBI is planned to be built as part of the development of the Kimkano-Sutarsky GOK. At the end of 2019, GOK produced 2,6 million tons of concentrate, due to the development of the Sutarsky and Kostenghinsky deposits in the Jewish Autonomous Region it is planned to reach a volume of 3,5-4 million tons of concentrate per year.

      IRC was originally part of the gold mining Petropavlovsk as an iron ore subsidiary, but in March Petropavlovsk signed a preliminary $ 10 million sale of its shares with Stocken Board AG.

      Petropavlovsk will retain 1,2% of the company. According to IRC materials, Evraz is the only buyer of its concentrate in Russia, in 2019 he bought raw materials worth $ 98,9 million. He was interested in buying the company in 2019, but negotiations did not reach the deal. The company also supplies to China.

      The Far East is a scarce region in terms of scrap collection, the alternative to which in steel production is HBI. According to the FRTP, in 2018 the deficit of scrap in the Far Eastern Federal District was 228 thousand tons, or 46% of the need. The government has long been considering different ways of providing steel sheet for SSK Zvezda (owned by Rosneft, Rosneftegaz and Gazprombank): supply of sheet by rail, construction of a mill-5000 in Primorye, for which slabs will be supplied, and cycle. The Ministry of Industry and Trade has repeatedly stated that there is no need for new rolling facilities in the Far East. Kommersant's interlocutors among metallurgists talked about the technical possibility of supplying large-format sheets by rail, but the head of Rosneft, Igor Sechin, said at a meeting with Vladimir Putin a year ago that a sheet of this size could not be transported by rail.

      According to Boris Krasnozhenov from Alfa-Bank, the idea of ​​creating HBI production on the basis of the facilities of OOO Petropavlovsk - Black Metallurgy looks quite logical. HBI is traditionally used in electrometallurgy.

      The only large metallurgical production in the Far East is Amurstal, which has electric arc furnaces (EAF) for steel production. Given the convenient logistics, HBI can be supplied to existing or new EAF facilities in the Far East. HBI, unlike traditional types of iron ore raw materials, practically does not contain harmful impurities, which is critical for the production of high-quality steel. Thus, the expert believes, the production of steel for shipyards can be set up without large-scale investments in large-scale blast furnace steelmaking facilities, the construction of which will take several years. "
      1. tralflot1832
        tralflot1832 7 July 2020 23: 26 New
        +1
        Thank you. Liberals are not interested, they are not interested in the full production cycle. They can only do something in a puddle. It’s clear from your information that they are working. You won’t know about it in the media. Thanks again.
    2. Simargl
      Simargl 8 July 2020 07: 03 New
      +1
      Quote: tralflot1832
      Or it will be necessary to build a steel plant in the Far East.
      Not foundry, but rolling
    3. Rzzz
      Rzzz 9 July 2020 21: 44 New
      +1
      Quote: tralflot1832
      From Volgodonsk drag reactors across the country.

      Why "across the country"? It is possible to bypass. In Volgodonsk, I loaded it on a steamer - and forward.
  13. ratfly
    ratfly 7 July 2020 22: 32 New
    +3
    Hari is unpleasantly fat for the signatories. It would be better to lay out the scheme of the boat itself.
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 7 July 2020 23: 33 New
      +4
      Yes, men need to lose weight,
      and the scheme - the model is there, admire
      1. tralflot1832
        tralflot1832 7 July 2020 23: 55 New
        +3
        Beautiful, infection !!!