Russian submarines in the North Atlantic became a "headache" of NATO

In recent years, the characteristics of the Russian Navy submarines have improved, and their crews have significantly improved their skills. The long and long campaigns of Russian submarines in the North Atlantic make NATO doubt its military superiority in this region.

About this writes the American edition of the Wall Street Journal.

Over the past few years, Russia has invested heavily in the modernization of its underwater fleetinherited from the Soviet Union. Now the Russian Federation has more silent and faster submarines that can go unnoticed at great depths and suddenly appear in the most unexpected places.

This is alarming for the NATO leadership, as Russian submarines are capable of disrupting US plans to quickly deploy troops across the Atlantic to Europe if the need arises. Moreover, in the near future it is planned to withdraw about a quarter of the American military contingent from Germany.

Americans are particularly worried about patrolling the Russian submarine fleet of the US East Coast.

And although NATO is in response to increasing the grouping of anti-submarine aircraft P-8A Poseidon in the UK, Norway and Iceland, this does not save the situation. Indeed, in recent years, thanks to its improved characteristics, Russian submarines are able to replay the Poseidons, hiding from them at the bottom of the Atlantic.

Comments

[Orangebig]

Americans are particularly worried about patrolling the Russian submarine fleet of the US East Coast.

This has been happening for decades, and nothing new.

[Paranoid50]

Quote: OrangeBig

And there is nothing new in this.

Well, no ... For example, yesterday "Prince Vladimir" (head Borey-A) arrived in Gadzhievo. Therefore, the service began.

[tralflot1832]

Probably ordered the weather! Warm, sunny. Long trouble-free years of service to the ship !!!

[Old26]

Another article from a series of custom-made. It took money for some kind of program - a Russian underwater threat appeared. Nothing is new. We already went through this. At one time, the United States talked about the missile superiority of the USSR in order to receive additional funding, and talked about otsovaniya
in strategic bombers. Now - submarines.

[tralflot1832]

Yes, everything is fine with the US submarines. They have a dream for our submarines to stand at their bases at the pier!

[Paranoid50]

Quote: Old26

It took money for some kind of program - a Russian underwater threat appeared.

Did she disappear somewhere? I mean, they need money constantly, and therefore the threat to them is permanent. Unless the immediate source of the threat is changing. Yesterday we went to Poseidon and Petrel, today - PL.

[NEXUS]

Quote: Old26

Now - submarines.

In general, the fleet is very expensive. And in the case of the United States, in which the fleet is essentially the main force of the Armed Forces, this is an expensive question and, given their doctrine, necessary.

[bar]

Russian submarines are capable of disrupting US plans to quickly deploy troops across the Atlantic to Europe if the need arises.

I wonder how such a need can arise? Is another "landing in Normandy" planned as an evacuation after a massive retaliatory nuclear strike?

[nPuBaTuP]

and the paragraph continues finally fire :))

Moreover, in the near future it is planned to withdraw about a quarter of the American military contingent from Germany.

that is, will we drown their ships with personnel on departure? :)))

[Aag]

Apparently, it is impossible to separate the political component from the military ...

[Mouse]

The states have a headache about everything .... a pill?
Doctor, something is hurting my head, and my ass too ...
the doctor takes a tablet from his pocket into two pieces and
extends to the patient: -This is from the head, this is from the backside, just look not
confuse ...

[Sonmaster]

Here I recall another joke:
“Doctor, that’s mine.”
- Oh, my friend, this is hemorrhoids!
- How hemorrhoids ??? On the face???
- So this is your face ??? !!!

[Kuroneko]

And although NATO is in response to increasing the grouping of anti-submarine aircraft P-8A Poseidon in the UK, Norway and Iceland, this does not save the situation. Indeed, in recent years, thanks to its improved characteristics, Russian submarines are able to replay the Poseidons, hiding from them at the bottom of the Atlantic.

Read the Wall Street Journal's words like: "Give us more more money".

[convoy]

Americans are particularly worried about patrolling the Russian submarine fleet of the US East Coast.

There is no one else in the world ..))) Well, here we are Russian ..
We just need someone to patrol This is our mission "gentlemen".

[tralflot1832]

Each SF submarine must have a photograph of the statue in the sunset at the entrance to the port of the City On the hill.

[dzvero]

Eto privates. The coolest should have a photo of the same statue, but a rear view against the backdrop of the rising sun

[SNEAKY]

There was a relatively recent article, quite literate, that the NATO means of detection do not really allow even Russian submarines to sail off the coast. And here, serenades under the window are singing with laudatory odes. And who should I believe?)

[tralflot1832]

See my post below. This is one of the options for the passage.

[Reserve buildbat]

You do not understand, this is different!
The article that NATO detection means see "everyone and everything, and everywhere" is for taxpayers. And "serenades with laudatory odes" are for the State Department, the Pentagon and other money-lovers

[tralflot1832]

In youth, if our steamer slowed down when leaving Murmansk and trudged barely to the fishing line, to the Nordkapp-Medvezhka-Spitsbergen line. It’s clear what we were doing. Orion will appear at least once.

[Guazdilla]

Russia has invested heavily in the modernization of its submarine fleet .....
About this writes the American edition of the Wall Street Journal.

Well, the Shtoto people had to come up with a solution to spend 128 billion dollars in the near future. dollars for 12 Columbia ".

[Guazdilla]

I also remember that the Horn came to Sevsk from 100 billion dollars. rubles for all this "Headache" for NATO
Everyone wept with happiness.

[tralflot1832]

Our submariners are such entertainers. In the mid-90s they went on the "baton", sorry, I don’t know the project. Between Canada and Greenland. We caught the AUG in the Atlantic and posted a photo taken through the periscope. Amers had such hysteria. The commander of the nuclear submarine and the admiral accompanying him, like the heroes of Russia received for this campaign.

[Charik]

on Baton? (pr 949 aka Antei aka Oscar (nato)) - maybe on Shchuk-B (pr 971- Shark (nato))

[tralflot1832]

Maybe, but through Labrador it’s for sure. And it seems that after the scandalous photo of the American admiral they flooded the fleet. But they wrote it to us, maybe embellished it.

[Bobxnumx]

Glory to the Russian fleet in centuries!

[tralflot1832]

I hope I won’t hurt the submariners' joke. The Russian submarine in the middle of the Atlantic is underwater. Commander’s compartment. Navigator: We can’t decide where we are, we’ve lost our coordinates! SO the last time I do it because of you. Commander: there is acoustics on the surface, there is acoustics and there is a single vessel right on the course. The torpedo compartment has two torpedoes on the noise or the radist and you write down the coordinates when this drowned person will SOS give. That's it ! But seriously, how the submariners determine their coordinates without surfacing.

[NOMADE]

Almost a similar anecdote, another option: the American captain "Halloween Russian!", Our captain "What!? Crappy painted ?!" "torpedoes for battle!"))

[tralflot1832]

The right side or !!! The second option is played out with a greeting HELLO, but VO will not miss foul language.

[Charik]

http://militaryrussia.ru/blog/topic-273.html

[nikant]

yes, there was a comment that almost the entire fleet (and submarines) Yankees "graze" in the seas and oceans: there are 2-3 times more of them ... it's like the former first tank line in the former GDR in a serious conflict: they had life before 15 minutes ... until cool to pull up the electronics, incl. and underwater, - there is nothing to catch at all ... someone is very smart it slows down ... you could only hope for railway mobile complexes, but they were also beautifully removed ... so think ...

[Aag]

Apparently, you did not understand ...

[PValery53]

"Russian submarines in the North Atlantic have become NATO's" headache "
- Keep it up !

[Rzzz]

Why are these submarines "steel nata's headache? Just somehow it became a shame.

They kind of always have been to her since the 60s.

[Aag]

"... Why are these submarines" becoming a headache for Nata? It just became somehow offensive .... "
Apparently, because for some time, they ceased to be it. Congratulations, with the re-entry into a series of threats to NATO! Strategic Rocket Forces. Without irony ... From the heart .... IMHO: in the native form of the sun, problems have accumulated ... I'm afraid we can’t take them out alone ... Harness yourself guys! Good luck to all of us!

[Bez 310]

The "Murukan" article is interesting for its hidden meanings.
"Sofa iksperts" VO immediately realized that "American
the military "demands even more American money to protect
from the increased power of the Russian submarine fleet.
The recorded patriots shouted loudly: "Keep it up!", "Slava
Russian fleet in the ages! ", And began to tell patriotic
jokes.
But it’s interesting not only how the warriors intimidate their own, but
and how Russians are praised:
"silent and fast submarines able to go unnoticed
at great depths and suddenly appear in the most unexpected places,
... Russian submarines are capable of outperforming Poseidons. "
In general, the "Murukans" have lost everything, and the Russians are great.
What is it for? How should we understand this message?

[Junior Warrant Officer]

How to understand this message?
Thanks to the amendments to the constitution, the Americans were afraid of our nuclear submarines.
Neither Armat, nor Poseidon, nor the Boomerangs, nor the Su-57, nor Peresvet, nor the eternal GDP, nor are they afraid of anything, but only the submarines are afraid

[Magog_]

This may also mean for our budget that the submariners, as in the 90s, decided again to "pull the blanket over their loved ones", so we hear again the familiar song that literally all the tasks of our fleet can be performed only by one submarine ...

[Charik]

which submarines are two or two?