The British media are hoping that Putin will leave behind a "normal" country

117

The emergence of a new generation of Russian voters who did not make the USSR gives Russia the opportunity to become a Western-style parliamentary democracy. Therefore, perhaps the main goal of a popular vote on amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation is not to get Putin the right to remain at the helm until 2036, but to ensure stability and prosperity in the country after he resigned as president.

So argues Mary Dezhevsky in an article published by the British publication The Independent. Unexpected rhetoric for British media.



Of course, one of the amendments to the Constitution will allow Putin to significantly extend his term in power, and a parade in honor of the 75th anniversary of Victory in the Great Patriotic War will contribute to an increase in the turnout. But the expert believes that this was not at all the main goal of the above-mentioned events.

She notes that although Putin’s personal rating in Russia has declined, it remains high enough for people to vote on the proposed amendments.

Mary Dezhevsky doubts that Putin will run for president in 2024. Having the opportunity of re-election, he will not allow competition between possible successors to break out, trying to maintain stability in the country. Even if this struggle cannot be completely avoided, it can be delayed.

Talking about “zeroing out” the presidential term, many do not notice that a number of proposed amendments to the Constitution change the balance between the executive and legislative branches of government, transferring part of the presidential powers to parliament. Thus, Russia may have "good chances to become a parliamentary democracy modeled on a number of European countries."

The expert noted that the struggle in Russia with the pandemic showed which way the Russian Federation was heading. According to Mary Dezhevsky, the central government is gradually transferring broader powers to the regional leadership. She believes that this is quite reasonable for such a huge country.

Summing up her reasoning, Mary Dezhevsky expressed hope that Putin would leave behind a “normal” country - more “normal” than that which he adopted 20 years ago.
117 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +26
    1 July 2020 11: 29
    It seems like she praised it) ... but the aftertaste from phrases like "Russia may have" good chances of becoming a parliamentary democracy on the model of a number of European countries "remains unpleasant ... Western democracy is not an example from the word at all ... these gay European values ​​are here Not needed ...
    1. +22
      1 July 2020 11: 39
      Mary Dezhevsky expressed hope that Putin will leave behind a “normal” country - more “normal” than that which he adopted 20 years ago.

      The country is already more normal than what it was 20-30 years ago.
      But our "normal" is always different from the English "normal", and I really hope that it will stay that way.
      1. +11
        1 July 2020 12: 57
        and in the country mostly young people who did not see what happened 20-30 years ago are dissatisfied
        1. +6
          1 July 2020 14: 27
          Yes, and education and the ability to do independent analysis is very lame ... they are unhappy ...
        2. +2
          1 July 2020 18: 44
          Quote: -sh-
          and in the country mostly young people who did not see what happened 20-30 years ago are dissatisfied

          And in my opinion, those who saw what happened 40-50 years ago.
          1. +1
            1 July 2020 19: 35
            It's right. One side. And on the other hand, when compared with the 90s?
        3. -12
          1 July 2020 19: 52
          How many more years will you scare for 90 years? They can justify everything! Are you seriously? Young people are so against the government that in 10 years they will be massively in power and there will be just a huge turn to the west (if the west itself does not change, which is unlikely). And the majority of young people have left-liberal views. So, you can say here, wow, what bad values ​​the West has, wow, we don’t like "these" at all, but at that time most of the young people share their values, they are not against "these", they are for freedom, for liberal values. Young people are completely Western in the Russian Federation, with which I congratulate you. Where does this opinion come from? I myself am a representative of youth, I study at the university, I sit in the largest groups in VK, where there are more young people. Therefore, while you were trying to return the USSR, beckoning greatness, the West, with the help of its culture, fully educated the youth.
          1. +1
            1 July 2020 21: 23
            Antonio_Mariarti, from your lack of foresight yourself and die from liberal values. The West itself will help.
          2. +1
            2 July 2020 00: 40
            Antonio_Mariarti Chick. Will you fly soon to study? You are our pro-Western. More careful.
          3. 0
            2 July 2020 17: 16
            I correctly understood that among the youth is full of buggers?
        4. +4
          1 July 2020 20: 00
          Quote: -sh-
          mostly unhappy young

          There are also middle-aged, but not far from youths. Yes
    2. -17
      1 July 2020 11: 41
      Quote: silberwolf88
      Western democracy is not an example of the word at all ... these geyropey values ​​are not needed ...

      True, we need the power of a strong leader.
      1. +3
        1 July 2020 11: 55
        The British media are hoping that Putin will leave behind a "normal" country

        Hope for Putin, but don’t be bad yourself! Yes
        1. +9
          1 July 2020 12: 34
          And who will determine the norm? Blacks have their own norm. Russians have their own. Or the English norm in India? Also, the norm was
      2. +14
        1 July 2020 12: 24
        True, we need the power of a strong leader.

        Isn’t that so? Vaughn Rockefeller glued the flippers - so the West has not been able to come to its senses for 4 years now - complete anarchy and anarchy.
        The emergence of a new generation of Russian voters who did not make the USSR, gives Russia the opportunity to become to parliamentary democracy of the western sample.

        This is a colony so diplomatically named, with a puppet government - I translate into Russian.
    3. +6
      1 July 2020 12: 09
      Quote: silberwolf88
      It seems like praised) ...


      But in fact they said disgusting in a completely British style.
    4. +1
      1 July 2020 12: 26
      What is wrong with parliamentarism?
      1. +9
        1 July 2020 12: 28
        What is wrong with parliamentarism?

        Inability to make a decision in time - it is no accident that the Romans, during crises, transferred power only in one hand ....
        1. +2
          1 July 2020 14: 06
          Quote: lucul
          Inability to make a decision in time - it is no accident that the Romans, during crises, transferred power only in one hand ....

          => And power can be transferred for life only on the assumption or in the expectation of a life-long crisis.
          1. +3
            1 July 2020 14: 11
            And power can be transferred for life only on the assumption or in the expectation of a lifelong crisis.

            Democracy, in the entire history of mankind, was only in Ancient Greece and Ancient Novgorod.
            But after Philip conquered Greece, and then, Alexander the Great, in only ten years of his life did what the Greeks could not achieve in 300 years, then the Greeks never again, in their history, returned to democracy ....
            1. +2
              1 July 2020 14: 31
              there is such a book by J. Heller Imagine a picture ... there is a lot of reasoning on the subject of Plato and democracy ... but the conclusions are correct ... there was not a single Mediterranean country that lived so poorly to accept Plato's democracy)))
      2. 0
        1 July 2020 21: 26
        Deniska999 - Brzezinski- give the Russians democracy. They themselves will be destroyed.
    5. +2
      1 July 2020 12: 30
      Quote: silberwolf88
      good chances to become parliamentary democracy modeled on a number of European countries

      Even if they do not hope.
    6. +6
      1 July 2020 12: 46
      On the day when the institute of monarchy is finally abandoned in LAndon and the monarchy is permanently abandoned, only on that day can the citizens of Russia give advice to Russia on how and what to do in their country!
    7. 0
      1 July 2020 15: 20
      Quote: silberwolf88
      but the aftertaste from phrases like "Russia may have" good chances of becoming a parliamentary democracy modeled on a number of European countries "remains unpleasant

      It seems that the British writer does not really understand what she wants .. if this happens, Russia and Britain did the same as they did with Libya. bring them democracy so to speak wassat
    8. +1
      1 July 2020 16: 10
      Any praise from the enemy is always a knife in the back and a chance to reflect on what's wrong, why is it that the Anglo-Saxons bowed in their bows ... If the enemy praises, then you need to do just the opposite, so that he goes out in anger: damned Russians again outwitted, deceived, and I so hoped for them ...
      Anglo-Saxons were never friends for Russia. These are constant enemies ...
    9. +1
      2 July 2020 10: 10
      The British leave ghostly hopes, the normality of Russia by your standards will not return, while those who remember the 90s are alive. And so we will try not to forget about them even after us.
    10. -2
      3 July 2020 10: 06
      Normal, this is which country? Like in the dashing 90s with retirees tearing down the trash, the beggars on every corner, the closed and closing enterprises. Workers receiving s / pl toilets, towels, spoons, etc.
      Everything, that normally for the Anglo-Saxons, not normal for normal people living in Russia ..
  2. +1
    1 July 2020 11: 29
    I have simplified the pros or cons to the limit. If the enemies shout "against", it means that they are afraid "for". So you have to do what they are afraid of ... wassat
    1. +7
      1 July 2020 11: 42
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      I have simplified the pros or cons to the limit. If the enemies shout "against", it means that they are afraid "for". So you have to do what they are afraid of ... wassat

      what can they say right now? turnout is already 56% - it will already be more than when voting on the old 93
      1. 0
        1 July 2020 11: 47
        Quote: poquello
        what can they say right now? turnout is already 56% - it will already be more than when voting on the old 93

        They can do all sorts of crazy "dumps". A friend from Kazan writes - his acquaintance told him that his wife, a state woman, was instructed to vote in another district for someone ... and even use the password - 100 rubles a piece of paper in the passport, attached with a paper clip on the page with the photo ... Well what do people have in their heads? And how much "garbage" is in the networks ...
        1. 0
          1 July 2020 12: 20
          Quote: Mountain Shooter
          They can do all sorts of crazy "dumps".

          and cameras seem to be everywhere, let’s look
        2. bar
          +6
          1 July 2020 14: 15
          A friend writes from Kazan - his acquaintance told him that his wife

          Convincingly, what. Almost like "one woman on the bus said"
    2. -20
      1 July 2020 11: 45
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      If the enemies shout "against", it means that they are afraid "for".
      If the enemies are shouting: Russians, don’t eat r ... oh and don’t drink water from the sewer, what does this mean? That's right, this means that you need to scoop up and enjoy what you did not do as they say to us from the west.
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      I have simplified the pros or cons to the limit.

      Well done! Bravo!!! good
      1. +12
        1 July 2020 11: 52
        Quote: mdsr
        That's right, this means that you need to scoop up and enjoy what you did not do as they tell us from the west.

        It’s a pity that you think that the Russians are not able to understand for themselves how and what they have ... and judging by their aggressiveness, you mark them as preachers?
        1. 0
          1 July 2020 12: 11
          Quote: Mountain Shooter
          .a judging by the aggressiveness - in the preachers mark?


          Surely ...
        2. 0
          1 July 2020 15: 26
          Quote: Mountain Shooter
          judging by aggressiveness - do you mark the preachers?

          rather clowns laughing
      2. -1
        1 July 2020 11: 53
        Quote: mdsr
        Quote: Mountain Shooter
        If the enemies shout "against", it means that they are afraid "for".
        If the enemies are shouting: Russians, don’t eat r ... oh and don’t drink water from the sewer, what does this mean? That's right, this means that you need to scoop up and enjoy what you did not do as they say to us from the west.
        Quote: Mountain Shooter
        I have simplified the pros or cons to the limit.

        Well done! Bravo!!! good

        laughing laughing laughing
      3. +5
        1 July 2020 12: 07
        If enemies shout: Russians, don’t eat r ... oh and don’t drink water from the sewer, what does this mean?


        "Don't drink, brother, you will become a kid," only sister Alyonushka can shout. But the Englishwoman Mary Dejevski will also praise and advise how it is more convenient to sip. wink Keep in mind, even if the British will help Russia, then only to then play off with their enemies.
        PS minus is not mine, for tales I do not minus. laughing
      4. bar
        +2
        1 July 2020 14: 19
        If enemies shout: Russians, don’t eat r ... oh and don’t drink water from the sewer, what does this mean?

        This means that this is a fake. Enemies will not worry about us. They will only be happy if we drink from the sewers.
    3. +3
      1 July 2020 11: 51
      And if they deliberately shout against? And by yourself decide without regard to the screamers what will be better for you and what is bad difficult?
      1. -5
        1 July 2020 11: 55
        Quote: lonely
        And if they deliberately shout against?

        All at once? What insidious laughing
        1. +7
          1 July 2020 12: 01
          Quote: Mountain Shooter
          Quote: lonely
          And if they deliberately shout against?

          All at once? What insidious laughing

          Well, agree that this is not an option ..
          Europe will say that BMW is better than Lada ... So Lada in your opinion is better than BMW? Choose what is better and what you need well with your mind, without listening to anyone hi
          1. +4
            1 July 2020 12: 15
            Quote: lonely
            Europe will say that BMW is better than Lada ... So Lada in your opinion is better than BMW? Choose what is better and what you need well with your mind, without listening to anyone

            Bad example.
            Europe says - it is necessary to abolish the prosecution of pedophilia. And for that I would tighten the punishment to the limit ... the United States kisses black boots and sues for trying to protect their home from pogromists ... what about Lada or BMW? This is your substitution of concepts ...
            1. +7
              1 July 2020 12: 45
              Quote: Mountain Shooter
              Europe says - it is necessary to abolish the prosecution of pedophilia. And for that I would tighten the punishment to the limit ...

              Well, I’m talking about the same thing .. By the way, in Russia, recently a court acquitted a pedophile .. You probably heard a story about this .. I would still have put a judge for this decision
              But to deny the usefulness of some things is absurd, even if you say Europe .. Therefore, we must decide with our own head, and not the negation
    4. +4
      1 July 2020 12: 20
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      I have simplified the pros or cons to the limit. If the enemies shout "against", it means that they are afraid "for".

      And if stuffing or disinformation? How Stalin before the war cleaned up the army. What then? Is there no prophet in his Fatherland?
      1. -3
        1 July 2020 13: 03
        Quote: Silvestr
        And if stuffing or disinformation? How Stalin before the war cleaned up the army. What then? Is there no prophet in his Fatherland?

        Stuffing or misinformation? Do you think that this amount of "disinformation" can be organized? Here you can throw stuff ...
        And in my own country I am my own prophet. Sorry, brothers, made a small provocation. It was necessary to calculate the trolls who minus the frenzy of all in a row ... especially those who have their own opinions that are different from their ... tasks, I suppose. There are also people very much offended by life ... but they are much less consistent wink
        1. +5
          1 July 2020 13: 12
          Quote: Mountain Shooter
          Do you think that so many "disinformation" can be organized

          There are no unsolvable problems, there is no desire to solve them
          Quote: Mountain Shooter
          calculate trolls who minus the frenzy of everyone ... especially those who have their own opinions that are different from their ... tasks

          Where without them request
          I was 20 years old laughing
          Figs with them. His opinion, now the product is expensive, sometimes dangerous
          1. +3
            1 July 2020 13: 20
            Quote: Silvestr
            Figs with them. His opinion, now the product is expensive, sometimes dangerous

            At the VO there are still much more adequate people. But they are in "minor ranks" and they can be "trampled". And an interesting social "cut" is obtained ... It is a pity, there is no possibility to analyze ... Previously, the majority here were military (including retired) and the defense industry, there were such interesting discussions. But there were flags, and it was clear who and where ... Anonymity is not always useful.
            1. +3
              1 July 2020 14: 37
              Happy Veteran of the fighting, comrades !!!!
        2. 0
          1 July 2020 17: 35
          It was necessary to calculate the trolls who minus the frenzy of all in a row ... especially those who have their own opinions that are different from their ... tasks, I suppose. ,,
          Are you one of those .... alert? Ukrainians, State Deputies have not yet begun to search?
    5. -1
      1 July 2020 13: 31
      rational decision.
  3. -2
    1 July 2020 11: 30
    We also hope that a normal country will remain after Putin.
    But in fact there will be a feudal-democratic parliamentary-presidential republic.
    1. +1
      1 July 2020 12: 05
      Quote: Junior Ensign
      We also hope that a normal country will remain after Putin.
      But in fact there will be a feudal-democratic parliamentary-presidential republic.

      However, you all moved .. Feudalism and democracy are incompatible concepts .. feudal serfdom, democratic parliamentary, democratic presidential or authoritarian presidential. Here are the options ..
      1. +1
        1 July 2020 12: 49
        Democracy is the right to choose!
        You have been given the opportunity to choose what they actually have accepted without you.
        This is the feudal-democratic form of government.
        1. -3
          1 July 2020 13: 32
          Are there objections in essence, or is the Baba Yaga stupidly against?
  4. +3
    1 July 2020 11: 33
    Before going to Russia with the wish of "democracy", the Anglo-Saxons should reconsider their clinically perverted monarchy.
    1. -7
      1 July 2020 11: 54
      Quote: Junior Private
      Before going to Russia with the wish of "democracy", the Anglo-Saxons should reconsider their clinically perverted monarchy.

      You are absolutely right! Let first:
      - abuse our constitution like we
      - they will find an irreplaceable person in their country, give him absolute power, and then, after the 20th reign, they will reset him to all terms
      - provide the middle class of their country with income in the amount of 17 thousand rubles and pensions in the amount of 13,5 thousand rubles
      and only then let them climb to us with their stupid advice. In the meantime, let them sit and blather on GREAT POWER
      1. +4
        1 July 2020 12: 21
        Quote: mdsr
        - abuse our constitution like we

        The most interesting thing is that Britain does not have its own constitution. There is a collection of laws and regulations that can be described as constitutional, but the document itself is not. wink
        1. +6
          1 July 2020 12: 49
          They suffer so much without the Constitution that they cannot eat already ... Nadot, send troops there and provide them with the Constitution ... laughing
      2. 0
        1 July 2020 12: 44
        Quote: mdsr
        will find an indispensable person in their country

        They have such a character - the queen
      3. +1
        1 July 2020 13: 37
        Can the Queen, with her powers, be elected by democratic vote or swapped for another? Not. So British journalists have no moral right to recommend living in other countries for some kind of democracy.
    2. -5
      1 July 2020 14: 25
      Anglo-Saxons should reconsider their clinically perverse monarchy.


      Leonid, this is just an article by a journalist. Otherwise, with all your "love" for the English, you need to update your knowledge of history.

      When the British announced Magna Carta Libertatum in the yard 1215 year. At that time in Europe there was shyness, serfdom, absolutism, and the British already limited royal power and talked about freedom. This hart of freedom and is considered the founder of modern democracy.
      1. +6
        1 July 2020 14: 56
        Strongly you wrote about the democratic ancestry of England. Only this is from the field of historical fiction, and I do not consider it a science. Tell me, for all the wars unleashed by England, open and not very robbery, drug trafficking and other democratic actions, who was a "demos" and who was a "kratos" and what kind of "freedom" are we talking about?
        1. -5
          1 July 2020 15: 15
          Tell me, for all the wars unleashed by England ....


          Yes, look, I’m not an admirer of the English either, so to speak, and you are right - only in the Opium Wars did they destroy the darkness of the Chinese, more than you lost in the Great Patriotic War .... But all the people and powers are like that - and at that time you bit off China's Primorye, Port Arthur, etc. etc. and there Count Ignatiev (if memory does not fail) played perfectly.

          But the story is in facts and if they are not interpreted selectively, then it does not turn into fiction. Sorry for the extensive writing - I'm just an admirer of history :)

          Good day to you hi
      2. +2
        1 July 2020 15: 15
        This hart of freedom and is considered the founder of modern democracy.


        You never know what they tell you, not all mu should be trusted !!! (from.)

        Quote: Keyser Soze
        When the British announced Magna Carta Libertatum


        The Charter of Liberty did not concern all Britons, but only privileged strata.
        In the XNUMXth century almost everywhere in England the peasants were freed from personal serfdom and their land was replaced. The corvee was replaced by cash rents, the volume of duties was fixed, and the Villanian holding was replaced by a copy-gold, giving a much greater amount of guarantees to the peasant.
        The result of the abolition of serfdom is not final - it is the 18th century. Then slavery was also abolished. And slavery in England is quite a reality. So it’s not worth adding up with fairy tales. The reality is different.

        1. -3
          1 July 2020 15: 20
          The Charter of Liberty did not concern all Britons, but only privileged strata.


          Well, of course - you have to start with something ... :) It concerned citizens, merchants, the Church, barons. But still the only such example in Europe at that time.
  5. +4
    1 July 2020 11: 34
    Summing up her reasoning, Mary Dezhevsky expressed hope that Putin would leave behind a “normal” country - more “normal” than that which he adopted 20 years ago.

    Despite what is written, I have a firm belief that the word "normal" country in the mind of an Englishwoman, and a normal country, in my understanding, are completely different things.
    Do parliamentary or presidential forms of government determine the degree of dependence of a country on external governance?
    Does it really matter and affect corruption?
    If the displacement of the center of gravity from one branch to another can determine "good" or "bad", then you can do nothing further.
    Transfer, every 10-20 years, the powers back and forth and everything is OK!

    When enemies praise, then I'm doing it wrong.
    Here is the main message.
    1. -6
      1 July 2020 11: 58
      Quote: demo
      When enemies praise, then I'm doing it wrong.
      Here is the main message

      Absolutely right good I also wrote this. Read my comment above.
    2. +5
      1 July 2020 12: 15
      Quote: demo
      Do parliamentary or presidential forms of government determine the degree of dependence of a country on external governance?

      Look at Moldova. The parliament is pro-Romanian and drowns for the surrender of sovereignty and unification with Romania, and President Dodon drowns for an independent Moldova, as a result they stomp on the spot and compete on who will put more sticks into the wheels.
      Quote: demo
      Does it really matter and affect corruption?

      It doesn’t. The importance of an independent court before which ALL are equal and the inevitability of punishment.
      1. +5
        1 July 2020 12: 22
        Quote: Nyrobsky
        The independent court before which ALL are equal and

        Where can I get it, with a monopoly of power?
        1. +6
          1 July 2020 12: 34
          Quote: Silvestr
          Quote: Nyrobsky
          The independent court before which ALL are equal and

          Where can I get it, with a monopoly of power?

          This is to say that the parliamentary or presidential form of government does not affect corruption, since this phenomenon is inherent in any system and exists in any form of government. It was in the USSR, and now there is the only difference - to a greater or lesser extent. In China, they are shot, but still they cannot be eradicated. And the United States is far from ideal, and maybe even more corrupt than anyone else in the world.
          1. +5
            1 July 2020 12: 42
            Quote: Nyrobsky
            It's me that the parliamentary or presidential form of government does not affect corruption,

            That's right! hi
          2. 0
            1 July 2020 17: 45
            In China, they are shot, but still they cannot be eradicated. ,,
            We DO NOT shoot them, but mostly reward them. And China is doing what is considered right — it’s like fighting flies, if they are not destroyed, there will be more. What is happening with the anti-corruption convention?
            1. 0
              1 July 2020 19: 13
              Quote: kotvov
              What's up with the convention about the fight against corruption, do not want to accept it.

              I don’t know. Maybe you need to ask the "edrists" about this? request
              1. The comment was deleted.
        2. 0
          1 July 2020 13: 05
          I’ve seen such a court in an American film .... but everyone knows that in any country it will be a myth
        3. -1
          1 July 2020 13: 36
          Well, why do the citizens of Uzbekistan care about our Constitution? Well, why? !!!! Is it smeared with honey? Well, why am I deeply and selflessly ... violet what is happening in Uzbekistan? Peace to you .... there ...
      2. 0
        1 July 2020 13: 26
        The importance of an independent court before which ALL are equal and the inevitability of punishment.

        You simply are not familiar with the modern realities of Russian justice.
        Or did you mean abstract court?
    3. +1
      1 July 2020 12: 15
      A "normal" country in the mind of an Englishwoman and a normal country, in my understanding, are completely different things.

      That's right ...
      When enemies praise, then I'm doing it wrong.

      As a mini worth looking around and pondering. They praise the head of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, and the people figured out what was happening and thought ...
    4. +3
      1 July 2020 12: 51
      Does it really matter and affect corruption?
      .. They say there: a rogue stole an apple, a gentleman already stole a billion ... laughing
  6. +5
    1 July 2020 11: 35
    Don't even dream. "Normal" in your understanding will not be. Have been, did not like it.
  7. +4
    1 July 2020 11: 37
    Which country after his reign will remain, only historians can give an answer, and the phrase
    The emergence of a new generation of Russian voters who did not make the USSR gives Russia the opportunity to become a Western-style parliamentary democracy
    offensive to me.
  8. 0
    1 July 2020 11: 43
    When difficult times come in Britain, their correspondents write more and more about Russia.

    “From January to March this year, the British economy contracted more than previously expected - by 2,2%. This is the sharpest drop in the UK economy since 1979. ”Http://www.imperiyanews.ru/details/ddd045b8-f9ba-ea11-8117-020c5d00406e
    In the St. Albany Cathedral in the British county of Hertfordshire, a picture with Jesus Christ, who has dark skin color, was placed on the altar. The painting is a variation on the theme of the fresco of Leonardo da Vinci "The Last Supper"
    http://www.imperiyanews.ru/details/33aa9c89-f9ba-ea11-8117-020c5d00406e
    Boris Johnson, Reuters reports on Monday, June 29.
    “It was a disaster. Let's not downplay our words, I mean that it was an absolute nightmare for the country, and the country experienced a deep shock ”,
    http://www.imperiyanews.ru/details/9e9f9bff-b0ba-ea11-8117-020c5d00406e
    Prime Minister Boris Johnson promises to get Britain out of the crisis with a recovery plan that he compares with Roosevelt’s new course.
    And the reviews of the people on his new course
    Robert norum
    Again fraud and dust in the eyes, quotes for the sake of self-PR and lies. At first, he wanted to be Churchill, and now he has shut himself up with Roosevelt - chickens to laugh! Yes, he is not good at tying their shoelaces - where should he be the prime minister!
    David
    The British were not slaves, but debts. Whether you like it or not, we are head over heels, and the Labor and Tories are to blame for this. And when at the same time they also sing “Rule, Britain, by the seas”, this is only salt to the wound.
    http://www.imperiyanews.ru/details/e53699dd-fdba-ea11-8117-020c5d00406e
    1. +3
      1 July 2020 12: 28
      And has our economy gone into growth?
  9. 0
    1 July 2020 11: 45
    "While talking about 'zeroing' presidential terms, many do not notice that a number of proposed amendments to the Constitution change the balance between the executive and legislative branches of government, transferring some of the presidential powers to parliament."
    But who reads and analyzes there one step ahead, everyone heard about zeroing and turned off the brain
    1. +10
      1 July 2020 12: 09
      Quote: Rubi0
      "While talking about 'zeroing' presidential terms, many do not notice that a number of proposed amendments to the Constitution change the balance between the executive and legislative branches of government, transferring some of the presidential powers to parliament."
      But who reads and analyzes there one step ahead, everyone heard about zeroing and turned off the brain

      And where did you see the parliament? In fact, it is an obedient instrument in the hands of the authorities, which accepts everything that is offered.
      1. +1
        1 July 2020 12: 27
        Do you kind of presidential hereditary power? Not?
        1. +1
          1 July 2020 12: 36
          Quote: Cyril G ...
          Do you kind of presidential hereditary power? Not?
          Reply

          Legally no, but actually Yes ..
          Do you think I’m delighted with this? In fact, what you have and what we have is the same .. We just all have a certain oriental flavor .. I do not think this is correct .. But I’m also against looking when choosing a solution on someone’s mouth .. The decision must be made by ourselves without regard to who said what ..
          1. 0
            1 July 2020 22: 21
            Quote: lonely
            In fact, what you have and what we have is the same ..


            No. You don't quite understand the structure of our power. Not the same thing. Although there are similarities. I don't mean which is better or worse, it is different. On the other hand, the "oriental flavor" is salvific in some way, in the matter of a certain centralization of power. There is no centralization, and the habit of it, and at one point in time an enchanting mess comes ...
  10. +2
    1 July 2020 11: 45
    What is good for England is bad for Russia! The whole policy of England has always been to cut Russia's wings!
  11. -1
    1 July 2020 11: 48
    She notes that although Putin’s personal rating in Russia has declined, it remains high enough for people to vote on the proposed amendments. 

    Well in Britain, you know better ...
  12. 0
    1 July 2020 11: 53
    She was not asked what to do.
  13. 0
    1 July 2020 11: 56
    Mary Dezhevsky doubts that Putin will run for president in 2024.
    Oh, how impudent are experiencing)) for us! laughing
  14. +1
    1 July 2020 11: 58
    So let them hope ..... they don’t go to someone’s garden with a pork snout !!!!
  15. +2
    1 July 2020 12: 00
    Normally, such a concept for describing social life can be applied very conditionally. Everyone has their own criteria.
    Non-coincidences can be serious, although some of the definitions are universal and essentially the same.
    May we have better living conditions for citizens, this is normal and universal.
  16. HAM
    0
    1 July 2020 12: 12
    "... Mary Dejevski expressed the hope that Putin will leave behind a" normal "country - more" normal "than the one he accepted 20 years ago ...."

    Read these lines - Yeltsin's Russia no longer satisfies with "normality", it is necessary to completely "normalize" to the west, well, something like Ukraine ....
  17. +1
    1 July 2020 12: 25
    AND.! I hope that the Anglo-Saxons will leave the whole world alone and return the loot to the peoples whom they robbed
  18. +5
    1 July 2020 12: 51
    Thus, Russia may have "good chances of becoming a parliamentary democracy modeled on a number of European countries."

    I believe that parliamentary democracy is an unacceptable form for Russia. They will engage in massacre in the Duma and laws will be adopted with a long delay, and most importantly, they will lobby the interests of the oligarchs as before. Of course, if everything remains as it is now, where EP steers everything, then generally write is gone.
    Our authorities should be centralized with great powers of the president, but the president should be a socialist.
  19. +1
    1 July 2020 12: 54
    Put the Western-style parliamentary democracy in one place. Soon, following the example of mattresses, you will kiss asses with all the colors of Europe
  20. +2
    1 July 2020 12: 54
    Finally, they recognize as theirs, bourgeois ... they will cancel the sanctions and go .. laughing
  21. +4
    1 July 2020 12: 59
    We were in London four years ago with my niece and rode the subway from Heathrow to the center. The carriage is black and colored, and we are like an eyesore. It would be better if they gave condoms to all colored ones so that they would not breed, but only for free they receive benefits, the more they plan, the more attendants they have.
  22. +1
    1 July 2020 13: 38
    Quote: Thrifty
    On the day when the institute of monarchy is finally abandoned in LAndon and the monarchy is permanently abandoned, only on that day can the citizens of Russia give advice to Russia on how and what to do in their country!


    the institution of the monarchy on the island of the damned performs a function very similar to the ebullient activities of Zhirinovsky / Volodya / Matvienko - they exist, they cost taxpayers dearly, but they do not solve anything, extras.
    in England, as in Russia, financial clans decide everything.
  23. +1
    1 July 2020 14: 06
    You shouldn’t rely on Putin anymore. He secured a period of survival. Most likely there will be no big shocks, but there will be no improvement either
  24. 0
    1 July 2020 14: 29
    For the Englishwoman - unexpectedly.
  25. +1
    1 July 2020 15: 59
    Quote: Attack aircraft
    Quote: Silvestr
    Where without them request
    I was -20 was laughing
    Figs with them. His opinion is now an expensive product, sometimes dangerous

    Ha ha ha -20? poor thing offended .. laughing here it reaches -1000 and you participate in this .. wink
    You are here one of the main trolls .. Everywhere climb ..! Only FIG understand now from Israel? Or an emigrant .. Well, it doesn’t matter, the struggle continues for Russia!

    TOTALLY agree with you! Sylvester complains about TWENTY minuses, and he and my companions in the last week have meted out TWO AND A HALF AND THOUSAND!
  26. +2
    1 July 2020 16: 05
    How these Western mosquek snakes from the Soviet Union))

    Banana them. There is no "Western model" there. The Russians are on their way.
  27. +1
    1 July 2020 16: 44
    For a large territory, only a stick / whip, otherwise it will be like in Moscow time, everything will be sold for a penny and dumped abroad, we know / passed
  28. +1
    1 July 2020 19: 39
    The British media are hoping that Putin will leave behind a "normal" country

    If "normal" for the impudent Saxons, then something is not very desirable. I remember in the 90s of the last century we were already "normal" for them. We still can't come to our senses ...
  29. +2
    1 July 2020 22: 28
    I hope that England will become a normal country without quotation marks. Without "Spanish women", without growing fascism, without other dirty tricks.
  30. 0
    2 July 2020 06: 16
    and we hope the same .. AFTER THE QUEEN the throne will finally TAKE OUR KING! and not how not a woman))
  31. 0
    2 July 2020 13: 50
    And I hope that Britain and this whole Western world will one day be able to become normal countries at last, and not remain brainless slaves of the consumer rut.
    1. 0
      3 July 2020 15: 51
      Everything can be. They will get sick, go mad in their own country in the West and become someday normal.
  32. 0
    2 July 2020 20: 45
    And we, in turn, hope that by the time Putin leaves his post from Britain, only memories will remain ...
  33. 0
    3 July 2020 07: 38
    The main thing is not so normal as Britain, EU countries and the USA.