Military Review

Kosachev: Russia does not conduct negotiations with the Kuril Islands with Japan

70

Moscow and Tokyo are discussing among themselves the conditions for concluding a peace treaty. During the discussion, the issue of the ownership of the Kuril Islands does not even arise, since the Kuril Islands are Russian land.


This statement was made by the chairman of the international committee of the Federation Council Konstantin Kosachev in an interview with reporters, which took place in a joint call center RTR и "Komsomolskaya Pravda".

During the conversation, the senator was informed that the Far Eastern residents were concerned about the content of the constitutional amendment on the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Russian Federation. They worry if its adoption would be the reason for the transfer of several of the Kuril Islands to Japan.

Kosachev noted that during negotiations with Tokyo, issues of disputed territories are not raised. Russia requires Japan to fully recognize the results of World War II in order to sign a peace treaty on this basis.

The senator noted that the transfer to the Japanese of part of the Russian territory is out of the question:

Theoretically, the territory of the Russian Federation may become larger, but will never become smaller.

A similar statement was made today for A REGNUM Honored Artist of Russia Denis Maidanov:

Russia can become more, not less. Even if the president and government change in the country, the new leaders will not be able to return to the issue of land transfer.
70 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Victor_B
    Victor_B 30 June 2020 17: 58 New
    +8
    Even if the president and government change in the country, the new leaders will not be able to return to the issue of land transfer.
    Actually, you can put an end to this.
    (Already for this you can vote for zeroing)
    1. 1976AG
      1976AG 30 June 2020 18: 07 New
      +8
      When did the constitution prevent our leadership from doing anything?
      1. Victor_B
        Victor_B 30 June 2020 18: 11 New
        +1
        Quote: 1976AG
        When did the constitution prevent our leadership from doing anything?

        Based on this amendment, Medved could not have transferred a piece of our shelf to Norway.
        1. 1976AG
          1976AG 30 June 2020 18: 12 New
          -1
          Was he legally ours?
          1. Victor_B
            Victor_B 30 June 2020 18: 17 New
            -2
            Was he legally ours?

            Come.
            Take it!
            (Someone of the greats)
            1. Tusv
              Tusv 30 June 2020 18: 39 New
              +5
              Quote: Victor_B
              (Someone of the greats)

              Tsar Leonid Xerxes said so. And now the Yankees say so when they ask for a loan to return
        2. NIKN
          NIKN 30 June 2020 18: 23 New
          +5
          Russia can become more, not less.

          I have an interesting neighbor, so I would trust him to bargain with the Japanese. I am sure that he would have bargained all over Japan for the Kuril Islands. laughing Well, this is so on the side of the topic, that something presented him simply in terms of the negotiator. laughing
          Well, on the topic, now it seems like there’s no sense in the negotiations already, it seems that the Japanese knew that they would have been climbing out of their skin so lately ...
          1. DMoroz
            DMoroz 30 June 2020 19: 04 New
            +3
            I have the feeling that the Japanese knew this, so that they would have lately climbed straight out of their skin ...
            We act correctly, otherwise the Kuril Islands or Seppuku ... (Abe himself promised at the grave of his ancestor). Let's look at the word japopremer ...
          2. Tusv
            Tusv 30 June 2020 19: 12 New
            0
            Quote: NIKNN
            I am sure that he would have bargained all over Japan for the Kuril Islands.

            Not. All Japan is not needed. Only South Sakhalin, which, out of ignorance of geography, the Japanese call Hokkaido bully
        3. Jager
          Jager 30 June 2020 19: 24 New
          +2
          And why was Medved entitled to transfer territories?

          GDP also gave away for free to the Chinese on the Amur Island - and silence in the media))
          And now here the turbopatriots are tearing up their vest - "nobody but Volodya!"
          1. 1976AG
            1976AG 30 June 2020 19: 39 New
            0
            Quote: Jager
            And why was Medved entitled to transfer territories?

            GDP also gave away for free to the Chinese on the Amur Island - and silence in the media))
            And now here the turbopatriots are tearing up their vest - "nobody but Volodya!"

            According to some, it’s not his fault, but the lack of relevant clauses in the constitution of the Russian Federation.
          2. Narak-zempo
            Narak-zempo 30 June 2020 23: 07 New
            +2
            Quote: Jager
            GDP also gave away for free to the Chinese on the Amur Island - and silence in the media))

            You do not understand this other
        4. Revival
          Revival 30 June 2020 19: 27 New
          +1
          How could delimitation and so on.
          He gave a direct chtoli gift, also under beautiful terms that have not disappeared
        5. syndicalist
          syndicalist 30 June 2020 20: 33 New
          0
          And Putin couldn’t pass the Tarabarov island to the Chinese comrades
        6. 210ox
          210ox 1 July 2020 06: 49 New
          +1
          Based on the Constitution of the USSR (where not a word was said about the inviolability of borders), no one at all had such a thing ... There is our state and that's it. It turns out that in modern Russia a certain "shpak" could always come to power and declare - "Kemsk volost? Yes, take it!"
        7. Rzzz
          Rzzz 1 July 2020 10: 07 New
          0
          Quote: Victor_B
          Based on this amendment, Bear could not

          Ha! They would have come up with an amendment to the amendment that this particular zone is not included in the amendment, or that the amendment applies only to land (in the same place the word "territory" is used).
          You have some high hopes for these crooks.
      2. Terenin
        Terenin 30 June 2020 18: 13 New
        +7
        Quote: 1976AG
        When did the constitution prevent our leadership from doing anything?

        And why, then, are you afraid of amending it?
        1. 1976AG
          1976AG 30 June 2020 18: 14 New
          -1
          Quote: Terenin
          Quote: 1976AG
          When did the constitution prevent our leadership from doing anything?

          And why, then, are you afraid of amending it?

          And where did you get that I'm afraid ??? Strange you ...
          1. Terenin
            Terenin 30 June 2020 18: 18 New
            +2
            Quote: 1976AG
            Quote: Terenin
            Quote: 1976AG
            When did the constitution prevent our leadership from doing anything?

            And why, then, are you afraid of amending it?

            And where did you get that I'm afraid ??? Strange you ...

            Are you writing this, not strange?
            1. 1976AG
              1976AG 30 June 2020 18: 20 New
              +2
              No, not weird. I just really look at things. And where did you see my fear of amendments?
              1. Terenin
                Terenin 30 June 2020 18: 29 New
                +1
                Yes, sorry forgot to clarify
                Quote: 1976AG
                When did the constitution prevent our leadership from doing anything?

                Which country's constitution and who is your leadership?
                1. 1976AG
                  1976AG 30 June 2020 18: 30 New
                  0
                  If I understand something else, then here is an article about amendments to the constitution of the Russian Federation. Or are you not from Russia?
                  1. Clear
                    Clear 30 June 2020 19: 19 New
                    0
                    Alex, here blurt out the provocative
                    Quote: 1976AG
                    When did the constitution prevent our leadership from doing anything?
                    and then "play the fool" and troll posts like
                    Quote: 1976AG
                    Strange you ...

                    Quote: 1976AG
                    I just really look at things.

                    Quote: 1976AG
                    Or are you not from Russia?
                    1. 1976AG
                      1976AG 30 June 2020 19: 23 New
                      +2
                      Quote: Terenin
                      Yes, sorry forgot to clarify
                      Quote: 1976AG
                      When did the constitution prevent our leadership from doing anything?

                      Which country's constitution and who is your leadership?


                      Why ask such questions? Or does his assessment of my comments depend on citizenship?
                      1. Clear
                        Clear 30 June 2020 19: 27 New
                        -1
                        Quote: 1976AG
                        Quote: Terenin
                        Yes, sorry forgot to clarify
                        Quote: 1976AG
                        When did the constitution prevent our leadership from doing anything?

                        Which country's constitution and who is your leadership?


                        Why ask such questions? Or does his assessment of my comments depend on citizenship?

                        Well, it’s really not clear what fact you meant by the statement that
                        When did the constitution prevent our leadership from doing anything?

                        Then bring this fact and everything will be clear ...
                        is it really difficult?
                      2. 1976AG
                        1976AG 30 June 2020 19: 33 New
                        +4
                        In particular, the procedure for secession from the USSR. A referendum was held, everyone knows how the majority of the population of the USSR expressed themselves and what happened next. Was the transfer of Crimea to Ukraine legal?
                      3. Clear
                        Clear 30 June 2020 19: 47 New
                        +3
                        Quote: 1976AG
                        In particular, the procedure for secession from the USSR. A referendum was held, everyone knows how the majority of the population of the USSR expressed themselves and what happened next. Was the transfer of Crimea to Ukraine legal?

                        Now I understand and I agree that in both cases there was a direct betrayal.
                      4. Rzzz
                        Rzzz 1 July 2020 10: 11 New
                        +1
                        Quote: 1976AG
                        Was the transfer of Crimea to Ukraine legal?

                        It is completely legal, as an internal administrative act of the USSR. But he ceased to operate during the collapse of the USSR, it was necessary to return the border at the time of the formation of the USSR in 1922.
                        And what Khrushchev did was not a decision at the state level. But like the creation of a "new Moscow", when a piece of territory was cut off from the region, and annexed to Moscow, so that more taxes would drip from rich territories.
                2. 1976AG
                  1976AG 30 June 2020 19: 25 New
                  +1
                  Quote: 1976AG
                  Quote: Terenin
                  Quote: 1976AG
                  When did the constitution prevent our leadership from doing anything?

                  And why, then, are you afraid of amending it?

                  And where did you get that I'm afraid ??? Strange you ...



                  This was my reaction to the fact that for some reason he decided that I was afraid of amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, although I believe that in my statements there was not a shadow of fear or fear ...
                  1. Nemchinov Vl
                    Nemchinov Vl 30 June 2020 23: 56 New
                    -2
                    Quote: 1976AG
                    Quote: 1976AG
                    Quote: Terenin
                    Quote: 1976AG
                    When did the constitution prevent our leadership from doing anything?

                    And why, then, are you afraid of amending it?

                    And where did you get that I'm afraid ??? Strange you ...



                    This was my reaction to the fact that for some reason he decided that I was afraid of amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, although I believe that in my statements there was not a shadow of fear or fear ...

                    Pooh pooh (!). good already "wag the tail"When and Terenin and Yasnaya right "caught by the tail and by the tongue" (!).. Right is no longer beautiful (!).
                    Quote: 1976AG
                    In particular, the procedure for secession from the USSR. A referendum was held, everyone knows how the majority of the population of the USSR expressed themselves and what happened next.
                    it is already "twist", rather than "move" (!!). And a comparison like -
                    Quote: 1976AG
                    Was the transfer of Crimea to Ukraine legal?
                    minimum incorrectly since the event took place under the power of Nikita Khrushchev (in the USSR !!!), and to vote on amendments to the current constitution of the Russian Federation, - WELL ABSOLUTELY NO SIDE !!!. From the word - TOTALLY (!)as warm with soft compare !!!..
                3. 1976AG
                  1976AG 30 June 2020 19: 36 New
                  0
                  And what is provocative about the question "are you not from Russia?" He touched upon the topic of citizenship, but I also don't know which country he is a citizen of.
    2. Jager
      Jager 30 June 2020 19: 26 New
      0
      I am for the inviolability of borders and against zeroing - where should I put a tick in the newsletter?

      They laughed at Brezhnev, and received a quarter of a century of rule.
      1. Narak-zempo
        Narak-zempo 30 June 2020 23: 17 New
        -2
        Quote: Jager
        I am for the inviolability of borders and against zeroing

        "I am for vodka, but against alcohol"
      2. Voyager
        Voyager 1 July 2020 14: 10 New
        0
        Quote: Jager
        They laughed at Brezhnev, and received a quarter of a century of rule.

        The presidential election has not yet begun. When they start, vote for others, what's the problem?
  • Thrifty
    Thrifty 30 June 2020 19: 04 New
    +2
    Let's hope that what is said is true, and the Japanese don’t have a donut hole shine abundantly anointed with wassabi. ..
  • 1976AG
    1976AG 30 June 2020 18: 05 New
    +4
    How the adoption of an amendment on the integrity of the Russian Federation can trigger the transfer of the islands of Japan?
    1. AVA77
      AVA77 30 June 2020 18: 11 New
      +6
      No way. It’s just that kind of work, there is a training manual and spin as you like, turn everything upside down. But work out grants.
    2. Terenin
      Terenin 30 June 2020 18: 14 New
      +4
      Quote: 1976AG
      How the adoption of an amendment on the integrity of the Russian Federation can trigger the transfer of the islands of Japan?

      Right. No way!
  • AVA77
    AVA77 30 June 2020 18: 06 New
    +1
    I doubt that the content of the amendment worries the Far Eastern residents, but apparently someone is worried if the "journalist" threw in such bullshit.
    1. Terenin
      Terenin 30 June 2020 18: 17 New
      +5
      Quote: AVA77
      but apparently someone is worried if the "journalists" threw such bullshit.

      Whatever it was, and a statement was made by the chairman of the international committee of the Federation Council K. Kosachev.
      Or again they will offer Putin to eat a cactus ...
      1. AVA77
        AVA77 30 June 2020 18: 30 New
        +1
        He will not eat a cactus, everything is in order with food. wink
  • Same lech
    Same lech 30 June 2020 18: 12 New
    +4
    Well, let's hope that there will be no more surprises with the transfer of land from Russia to foreign states ... I well remember the tricks of Shevarnadze and Gorbachev and Medvedev ... enough. am
    I will consider any attempt to give even a piece of our land to a foreign state as a betrayal of the interests of Russia and its people.
    1. 1976AG
      1976AG 30 June 2020 18: 17 New
      0
      And before it was considered as a betrayal, but for some this does not prevent to turn their affairs, even despite the results of the referendum.
    2. syndicalist
      syndicalist 30 June 2020 20: 41 New
      -3
      Quote: The same Lech
      Well, let's hope that there will be no more surprises with the transfer of land from Russia to foreign states ... I well remember the tricks of Shevarnadze and Gorbachev and Medvedev ... enough. am .

      About Putin's trick with the island of Tarabarov and 337 square meters. km of our land forgotten again? But the Chinese then did not sign the act of the complete absence of territorial claims against Russia. And now even more so they will not sign it.
    3. Siberian
      Siberian 1 July 2020 09: 06 New
      +1
      I am reading the Constitution (in force at this hour): chapter 1, article 4, paragraph 3 (quote, literally, copied) "3. The Russian Federation ensures the integrity and inviolability of its territory." Is it radically different? Amendment: The Russian Federation ensures the protection of its sovereignty and territorial integrity. Actions (with the exception of delimitation, demarcation, redemarcation of the state border of the Russian Federation with neighboring states) aimed at alienating part of the territory of the Russian Federation, as well as calls for such actions, are not allowed.
      Find a couple of differences ... And what is this, if not a change in boundaries?
      In the previous edition no demarcations, delimitations, re-demarcations were supposed.
      And so on almost every major amendment. Just read the text itself, everywhere there are some exceptions in brackets.
  • Million
    Million 30 June 2020 18: 13 New
    0
    The retirement age was also not supposed to increase ..
    But then: the circumstances were that way .... Over time, everything changes ....
    1. 1976AG
      1976AG 30 June 2020 19: 13 New
      0
      Quote: Million
      The retirement age was also not supposed to increase ..
      But then: the circumstances were that way .... Over time, everything changes ....

      See, minus. True eyes prick)
      1. Million
        Million 30 June 2020 20: 31 New
        0
        Yes, there is a certain category of people who are minusers and, in combination, pseudopatriots
  • tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 30 June 2020 19: 27 New
    -2
    The train left. Late on July 2, our Kuril Islands have always been on.
    1. 1976AG
      1976AG 30 June 2020 19: 45 New
      +3
      Quote: tralflot1832
      The train left. Late on July 2, our Kuril Islands have always been on.

      I wish it were so. My question arose, from the article I did not understand. It turns out Japan agreed to discuss the conclusion of a peace treaty without transferring our islands to Japan ??? Well then, this is already the success of our diplomacy !!!
      1. tralflot1832
        tralflot1832 30 June 2020 19: 53 New
        0
        I understand that too. But then for Abe it is political suicide, Rostov is not rubbery with us. Or Eastern insidiousness is present somewhere. The Foreign Ministry has such information only after the opponents in the negotiations.
  • Azis
    Azis 30 June 2020 21: 10 New
    0
    If the amendments to the Constitution would say: "not an inch of Russian [Russian] land, for it is not," and so ... demarcation, delimitation, redemarcation ... they will find a reason if they want to. Although, in general:
  • AML
    AML 30 June 2020 21: 11 New
    +2
    Quote: 1976AG
    Quote: Jager
    And why was Medved entitled to transfer territories?

    GDP also gave away for free to the Chinese on the Amur Island - and silence in the media))
    And now here the turbopatriots are tearing up their vest - "nobody but Volodya!"

    According to some, it’s not his fault, but the lack of relevant clauses in the constitution of the Russian Federation.


    And Putin, what does it have to do with it? The border was along the riverbed, the channel changed, the border moved. Now nothing depends on the river bed. You can drive the Chinese that they kind of artificially changed the channel, but who forbade it? If you want to threaten them with your finger, then remember the scythe on Tuzla. Now nailed to the coordinates. It is incomprehensible only with the Ukrainian borders and that is not in their favor, everything else is rigidly nailed.
  • Aleks2000
    Aleks2000 30 June 2020 22: 09 New
    -2
    Hahaha.
    It is impossible to transmit, it is possible to straighten and redistribute.
    3 cases are most known, like:
    The Chinese islands on the river, where our once repulsed
    Norway piece of shelf with oil.
    Japan, a piece of the bottom somewhere in the sea ...

    And nobody takes into account the little things, yes, no ...
  • Andobor
    Andobor 30 June 2020 23: 30 New
    0
    Japan is deprived of geopolitical independence, it makes no sense to speak with it about the islands.
  • Ros 56
    Ros 56 1 July 2020 05: 29 New
    -1
    All to the polling stations and drown for the integrity of the country. good
  • Siberian
    Siberian 1 July 2020 09: 13 New
    0
    The salary is not less than the MINIMUM subsistence minimum, which the devil knows what and by whom is determined, and they immediately joyfully informed that the hourly payment would be considered. Count - at least, but the calculation will not be for the whole day, but for a couple of hours of work that the state can provide (remember - 25 million high-tech and highly paid jobs, where are they all?). And the law is not violated, and even a reference to the will of the people, it seems like they themselves asked.