Military Review

The head of USC called the deadline for the return of the TAVKR "Admiral Kuznetsov

41
The head of USC called the deadline for the return of the TAVKR "Admiral Kuznetsov

The only Russian heavy aircraft cruiser Admiral Kuznetsov will be transferred to the Naval fleet in the year 2022. This was stated on the radio by "Moscow Talks" president of USC Alexei Rakhmanov.


According to Rakhmanov, work on the cruiser is in full swing, they were suspended only to assess the damage caused by the fire that occurred on the ship in December 2019. Also, the deadlines for the commissioning of Admiral Kuznetsov will not be affected by a change in the contractor for the construction of the dry dock, he added.

I am ready to confirm once again that our delivery plans are not moving anywhere and are not changing: in 2022 the ship will again be part of the Navy

- said Rakhmanov.

Earlier it was reported that the final cost of repairing the cruiser Admiral Kuznetsov was determined. According to information published on the public procurement portal, USC will pay the contractor 251,4 million rubles.

Recall that the repair and modernization of the Admiral Kuznetsov Tavkr began in 2017. It was originally planned that the cruiser will be delivered to the customer in 2020, but a series of accidents on the ship led to the fact that the timing of the return of the TAVKR began to shift to the right. Currently, Admiral Kuznetsov is located at the 35th shipyard in Murmansk (Zvyozdochka branch).
Photos used:
Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
41 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 25 June 2020 14: 09 New
    +1
    Not so long left. We will see ... wink
    1. Threaded screw
      Threaded screw 25 June 2020 14: 11 New
      -11
      We will see ...
      Yes, he saw species laughing
    2. The leader of the Redskins
      The leader of the Redskins 25 June 2020 14: 14 New
      -13
      Rakhmanov had already forgotten, go and tell me what term he called. Responsibility is still not borne ...
      1. Alex777
        Alex777 25 June 2020 14: 24 New
        -4
        If I had my way, Rakhmanov would have been the first to sit down. And Rogozin.
        Although, of course, I do not have all the information. This is IMHO. hi
        1. Serg65
          Serg65 25 June 2020 14: 30 New
          +6
          Quote: Alex777
          Although, of course, I do not have all the information.

          laughing But still shooting !!! good
          1. Alex777
            Alex777 25 June 2020 14: 31 New
            -1
            Everything secret will be revealed.
            Why shoot? Into his sharashka.
            If something useful can. bully
            1. Serg65
              Serg65 25 June 2020 14: 46 New
              +3
              Quote: Alex777
              Into his sharashka.

              laughing The same is only for free. lol
              1. Alex777
                Alex777 25 June 2020 16: 38 New
                +1
                The same is only for free.

                What is the same?
                Have you equated the execution you proposed with my proposal for a free character job for the good of the state?
                I see a big difference in this comparison.
                It’s strange that you don’t notice her. hi
                1. Serg65
                  Serg65 26 June 2020 10: 02 New
                  0
                  Quote: Alex777
                  I see a big difference in this comparison.

                  I mean that Rakhmanov will do the same as now, only for free wink Ie you deployed my hint but not to the end! If you think that he is a balabol and receives money for this, then in a sharashka for the same balabolism he will receive only a balance ... then it is better to shoot .... more economical for the state bully
            2. Grits
              Grits 26 June 2020 08: 18 New
              +2
              Quote: Alex777
              If something useful can.

              Able to. If only not to roll bags.
      2. Serg65
        Serg65 25 June 2020 14: 29 New
        +3
        Quote: Leader of the Redskins
        Rakhmanov had already forgotten, go and tell me what term he called. Responsibility is still not borne ...

        what How Ukrainians worry about Russia, already a tear breaks !!! crying
        1. Sandor Clegane
          Sandor Clegane 25 June 2020 14: 39 New
          +3
          Quote: Serg65
          How Ukrainians worry about Russia, already a tear breaks !!!

          how the LIBERALS try not to write comments, but to pour a bucket of waste on the accompanying comment, the only good thing is that the Fleet will contain an aircraft-carrying cruiser and its air wing, no matter what! And no matter how many minusers fought against Claudia, erasing fingerprints on buttons and sweating without a break for lunch and sleep - BE aircraft carrier fleet! And the rest will pass, like sewage water runoff!
          1. snucerist
            snucerist 26 June 2020 11: 40 New
            -1
            Who is stopping him? TO BE?
            Let it be. For the simple reason that we cannot build anything equal today. Not to mention full-fledged aircraft carriers such as American or English.
            Therefore, we will be forced to use this scrap.
            Although...
            To be honest - is it needed?
            Today, only the lazy did not laugh at the driving characteristics of Kuzi and his performance characteristics. As for the wing ... The question is the same - who needs it? Defective, able to take off only with incomplete combat loading and refueling (otherwise it will not take off)?
            What adversary scare Kuzey?
            Without AWACS cars, without a full AUG?
            Or will the treasury stand it all? Any endless repairs and upgrades?
            1. Sandor Clegane
              Sandor Clegane 26 June 2020 13: 12 New
              +3
              Quote: snucerist
              Therefore, we will be forced to use this scrap

              scrap metal - your garage
              Quote: snucerist
              that we can’t build anything equal today

              fool keep your inflamed conclusions

              Quote: snucerist
              The question is the same - who needs it?

              IMF RF
              Quote: snucerist
              What adversary scare Kuzey?

              who to scare akm? ... something you rested your head against the wall and don’t moo do not calve
              Quote: snucerist
              Without AWACS cars, without a full AUG

              The first common thought, but there is an AWACS !!

              Quote: snucerist
              Or will the treasury stand it all?
              even very easy to withstand - you must be able to spend the budget correctly and not steal!
          2. for
            for 26 June 2020 13: 56 New
            0
            Quote: Sandor Clegane
            how LIBERALS try not to write comments

            Power is not written here, they are mainly in foreign social networks. networks are sitting.
    3. Alex777
      Alex777 25 June 2020 14: 29 New
      -3
      Not so long left

      The floating dock was drowned and no one was going to lift. New do not build.
      Dry dock - a year of time and a lot of money lost and when they build it - no one knows.
      All at Rakhmanov’s forks by water. IMHO. To my deep regret. hi
    4. TermNachTer
      TermNachTer 25 June 2020 18: 53 New
      0
      I would like the modernization to be maximum. Remove "Granite", increase the composition of the air group, and other useful things.
      1. Avior
        Avior 26 June 2020 05: 18 New
        0
        Similar work on Gorshkov cost $ 2,3-2,9 billion
      2. Grits
        Grits 26 June 2020 08: 20 New
        0
        Quote: TermNachTER
        I would like the modernization to be maximum. Remove "Granite", increase the composition of the air group, and other useful things.

        Just on Granite, then there is no information. Therefore, they call him in the future either a cruiser or an aircraft carrier. If the missiles are removed, then he will no longer be a full-fledged cruiser, turning simply into an aircraft carrier. But there is no sense in leaving Granites.
        1. TermNachTer
          TermNachTer 26 June 2020 18: 03 New
          0
          Well, there are no "granites" anymore. And they took up a lot of space. The idea of ​​universality, alas, did not justify itself.
      3. Alien ...
        Alien ... 26 June 2020 19: 32 New
        0
        You can’t make an aircraft carrier out of it ... The Soviet legacy under the treaties ... Or rather, it is possible, but we’ll run into some restrictions ...
  2. Sahalinets
    Sahalinets 25 June 2020 14: 32 New
    +4
    For a long time I do not take seriously their promises. I don’t even remember when they completed at least one ...
    1. Piramidon
      Piramidon 25 June 2020 14: 39 New
      -1
      Quote: Sahalinets
      For a long time I do not take seriously their promises. I don’t even remember when they completed at least one ...

      If they were less on the air and in the Internet tryndeli, but they did more, maybe then the dates would not have shifted. Almost daily here, as thimbles for a period of time juggle all types of equipment. What really can be taken seriously. Only bitter smiles cause.
  3. pereselenec
    pereselenec 25 June 2020 14: 40 New
    -2
    I remember when, from the time when the dry dock sank, before the fire on Kuznetsov, when sensible people wrote about how it would all end, the local idiots minus such commentators, they called them more liberal and forgiving. And it’s how it turned out ...
    1. Serg65
      Serg65 25 June 2020 14: 48 New
      +4
      Quote: pereselenec
      when here healthy people wrote about how it would all end

      And how did that end?
      1. pereselenec
        pereselenec 25 June 2020 16: 47 New
        +2
        Quote: Serg65
        And how did that end?


        The Order of Alexander Nevsky and the continuing disruption of our only near-aircraft carrier.
        1. Serg65
          Serg65 26 June 2020 09: 55 New
          0
          Quote: pereselenec
          The Order of Alexander Nevsky and the continuing disruption of our only near-aircraft carrier.

          So is this the end? Will there be no continuation?
    2. codetalker
      codetalker 26 June 2020 13: 52 New
      +1
      Sound people are also seen by visionaries, since they predicted the flooding of the dock and the fire ...
  4. Runoway
    Runoway 25 June 2020 14: 52 New
    +3
    wait a long time request
    1. Ratmir_Ryazan
      Ratmir_Ryazan 25 June 2020 22: 24 New
      -3
      What directly burned down the flagship? A transfer to the fleet in 2022 was written in Russian for you, work is on schedule.

      And fires happen abroad and nothing happens, ships and submarines work and build.

      Look at how many ships and what kind of ships the fleet received over the past 10 years and with what weapons, how many civilian ships were built, and this is after 20 years of practical inaction of the shipbuilding industry and then you will understand that Rakhmanov deserved his order.
  5. Andylw
    Andylw 25 June 2020 15: 00 New
    +3
    He’s lying like breathing.
    Not once did the words of this wrecker on the deadlines for the delivery of ships correspond to real
  6. Alien From
    Alien From 25 June 2020 16: 10 New
    +1
    The difficult fate of this admiral .......
    1. antivirus
      antivirus 25 June 2020 17: 16 New
      +3
      I have always been against 7 pieces of 70 tons, but this must be returned to duty
      1. Alien From
        Alien From 25 June 2020 17: 34 New
        +5
        I agree with you, otherwise we will completely lose competence in this most complicated type of armament!
        1. Gaubvaxta
          Gaubvaxta 25 June 2020 17: 37 New
          +3
          Quote: Alien From
          otherwise, we will completely lose competence in this complex type of armament!

          It is for the sake of maintaining personnel and development that Kuzyu needs to be put in operation! This is a matter of principle, and all these accidents are strange to many thoughts. hi
    2. codetalker
      codetalker 26 June 2020 13: 55 New
      +1
      What can I say ... Poetically!
  7. Vadim237
    Vadim237 25 June 2020 18: 27 New
    +1
    It will be surrendered if only the next krivoruky fire there does not suit.
  8. Karaul73
    Karaul73 25 June 2020 20: 40 New
    +2
    Quote: Alex777
    If I had my way, Rakhmanov would have been the first to sit down. And Rogozin.
    Although, of course, I do not have all the information. This is IMHO. hi

    From crouched to pay off. But if you bring to the ravine, then something may change.
  9. Ratmir_Ryazan
    Ratmir_Ryazan 25 June 2020 22: 20 New
    -3
    I am ready to confirm once again that our delivery plans are not moving anywhere and are not changing: in 2022 the ship will again be part of the Navy

    - said Rakhmanov.


    Encouraging statement. Faster would have completed everything and on a campaign, again to Syria, and you can go to Cuba. So that evil tongues bite them for themselves, and our sailors experience and training, the prestige of the state from demonstrating in action an aircraft carrier.
  10. tolmachiev51
    tolmachiev51 26 June 2020 03: 12 New
    0
    - somehow they do not take root in our fleet !!! some problems.
  11. Arthur 85
    Arthur 85 26 June 2020 06: 00 New
    0
    Hurry up. And so that more workouts.