The head of USC called the deadline for the return of the TAVKR "Admiral Kuznetsov

The only Russian heavy aircraft cruiser Admiral Kuznetsov will be transferred to the Naval fleet in the year 2022. This was stated on the radio by "Moscow Talks" president of USC Alexei Rakhmanov.

According to Rakhmanov, work on the cruiser is in full swing, they were suspended only to assess the damage caused by the fire that occurred on the ship in December 2019. Also, the deadlines for the commissioning of Admiral Kuznetsov will not be affected by a change in the contractor for the construction of the dry dock, he added.

I am ready to confirm once again that our delivery plans are not moving anywhere and are not changing: in 2022 the ship will again be part of the Navy

- said Rakhmanov.

Earlier it was reported that the final cost of repairing the cruiser Admiral Kuznetsov was determined. According to information published on the public procurement portal, USC will pay the contractor 251,4 million rubles.

Recall that the repair and modernization of the Admiral Kuznetsov Tavkr began in 2017. It was originally planned that the cruiser will be delivered to the customer in 2020, but a series of accidents on the ship led to the fact that the timing of the return of the TAVKR began to shift to the right. Currently, Admiral Kuznetsov is located at the 35th shipyard in Murmansk (Zvyozdochka branch).

Comments

[Mountain shooter]

Not so long left. We will see ...

[Threaded screw]

We will see ...

Yes, he saw species

[The leader of the Redskins]

Rakhmanov had already forgotten, go and tell me what term he called. Responsibility is still not borne ...

[Alex777]

If I had my way, Rakhmanov would have been the first to sit down. And Rogozin.
Although, of course, I do not have all the information. This is IMHO.

[Serg65]

Quote: Alex777

Although, of course, I do not have all the information.

But still shooting !!!

[Alex777]

Everything secret will be revealed.
Why shoot? Into his sharashka.
If something useful can.

[Serg65]

Quote: Alex777

Into his sharashka.

The same is only for free.

[Alex777]

The same is only for free.

What is the same?
Have you equated the execution you proposed with my proposal for a free character job for the good of the state?
I see a big difference in this comparison.
It’s strange that you don’t notice her.

[Serg65]

Quote: Alex777

I see a big difference in this comparison.

I mean that Rakhmanov will do the same as now, only for free Ie you deployed my hint but not to the end! If you think that he is a balabol and receives money for this, then in a sharashka for the same balabolism he will receive only a balance ... then it is better to shoot .... more economical for the state

[Grits]

Quote: Alex777

If something useful can.

Able to. If only not to roll bags.

[Serg65]

Quote: Leader of the Redskins

Rakhmanov had already forgotten, go and tell me what term he called. Responsibility is still not borne ...

How Ukrainians worry about Russia, already a tear breaks !!!

[Sandor Clegane]

Quote: Serg65

How Ukrainians worry about Russia, already a tear breaks !!!

how the LIBERALS try not to write comments, but to pour a bucket of waste on the accompanying comment, the only good thing is that the Fleet will contain an aircraft-carrying cruiser and its air wing, no matter what! And no matter how many minusers fought against Claudia, erasing fingerprints on buttons and sweating without a break for lunch and sleep - BE aircraft carrier fleet! And the rest will pass, like sewage water runoff!

[snucerist]

Who is stopping him? TO BE?
Let it be. For the simple reason that we cannot build anything equal today. Not to mention full-fledged aircraft carriers such as American or English.
Therefore, we will be forced to use this scrap.
Although...
To be honest - is it needed?
Today, only the lazy did not laugh at the driving characteristics of Kuzi and his performance characteristics. As for the wing ... The question is the same - who needs it? Defective, able to take off only with incomplete combat loading and refueling (otherwise it will not take off)?
What adversary scare Kuzey?
Without AWACS cars, without a full AUG?
Or will the treasury stand it all? Any endless repairs and upgrades?

[Sandor Clegane]

Quote: snucerist

Therefore, we will be forced to use this scrap

scrap metal - your garage

Quote: snucerist

that we can’t build anything equal today

keep your inflamed conclusions

Quote: snucerist

The question is the same - who needs it?

IMF RF

Quote: snucerist

What adversary scare Kuzey?

who to scare akm? ... something you rested your head against the wall and don’t moo do not calve

Quote: snucerist

Without AWACS cars, without a full AUG

The first common thought, but there is an AWACS !!

Quote: snucerist

Or will the treasury stand it all?

even very easy to withstand - you must be able to spend the budget correctly and not steal!

[for]

Quote: Sandor Clegane

how LIBERALS try not to write comments

Power is not written here, they are mainly in foreign social networks. networks are sitting.

[Alex777]

Not so long left

The floating dock was drowned and no one was going to lift. New do not build.
Dry dock - a year of time and a lot of money lost and when they build it - no one knows.
All at Rakhmanov’s forks by water. IMHO. To my deep regret.

[TermNachTer]

I would like the modernization to be maximum. Remove "Granite", increase the composition of the air group, and other useful things.

[Avior]

Similar work on Gorshkov cost $ 2,3-2,9 billion

[Grits]

Quote: TermNachTER

I would like the modernization to be maximum. Remove "Granite", increase the composition of the air group, and other useful things.

Just on Granite, then there is no information. Therefore, they call him in the future either a cruiser or an aircraft carrier. If the missiles are removed, then he will no longer be a full-fledged cruiser, turning simply into an aircraft carrier. But there is no sense in leaving Granites.

[TermNachTer]

Well, there are no "granites" anymore. And they took up a lot of space. The idea of ​​universality, alas, did not justify itself.

[Alien ...]

You can’t make an aircraft carrier out of it ... The Soviet legacy under the treaties ... Or rather, it is possible, but we’ll run into some restrictions ...

[Sahalinets]

For a long time I do not take seriously their promises. I don’t even remember when they completed at least one ...

[Piramidon]

Quote: Sahalinets

For a long time I do not take seriously their promises. I don’t even remember when they completed at least one ...

If they were less on the air and in the Internet tryndeli, but they did more, maybe then the dates would not have shifted. Almost daily here, as thimbles for a period of time juggle all types of equipment. What really can be taken seriously. Only bitter smiles cause.

[pereselenec]

I remember when, from the time when the dry dock sank, before the fire on Kuznetsov, when sensible people wrote about how it would all end, the local idiots minus such commentators, they called them more liberal and forgiving. And it’s how it turned out ...

[Serg65]

Quote: pereselenec

when here healthy people wrote about how it would all end

And how did that end?

[pereselenec]

Quote: Serg65

And how did that end?

The Order of Alexander Nevsky and the continuing disruption of our only near-aircraft carrier.

[Serg65]

Quote: pereselenec

The Order of Alexander Nevsky and the continuing disruption of our only near-aircraft carrier.

So is this the end? Will there be no continuation?

[codetalker]

Sound people are also seen by visionaries, since they predicted the flooding of the dock and the fire ...

[Runoway]

wait a long time

[Ratmir_Ryazan]

What directly burned down the flagship? A transfer to the fleet in 2022 was written in Russian for you, work is on schedule.

And fires happen abroad and nothing happens, ships and submarines work and build.

Look at how many ships and what kind of ships the fleet received over the past 10 years and with what weapons, how many civilian ships were built, and this is after 20 years of practical inaction of the shipbuilding industry and then you will understand that Rakhmanov deserved his order.

[Andylw]

He’s lying like breathing.
Not once did the words of this wrecker on the deadlines for the delivery of ships correspond to real

[Alien From]

The difficult fate of this admiral .......

[antivirus]

I have always been against 7 pieces of 70 tons, but this must be returned to duty

[Alien From]

I agree with you, otherwise we will completely lose competence in this most complicated type of armament!

[Gaubvaxta]

Quote: Alien From

otherwise, we will completely lose competence in this complex type of armament!

It is for the sake of maintaining personnel and development that Kuzyu needs to be put in operation! This is a matter of principle, and all these accidents are strange to many thoughts.

[codetalker]

What can I say ... Poetically!

[Vadim237]

It will be surrendered if only the next krivoruky fire there does not suit.

[Karaul73]

Quote: Alex777

If I had my way, Rakhmanov would have been the first to sit down. And Rogozin.
Although, of course, I do not have all the information. This is IMHO.

From crouched to pay off. But if you bring to the ravine, then something may change.

[Ratmir_Ryazan]

I am ready to confirm once again that our delivery plans are not moving anywhere and are not changing: in 2022 the ship will again be part of the Navy

- said Rakhmanov.

Encouraging statement. Faster would have completed everything and on a campaign, again to Syria, and you can go to Cuba. So that evil tongues bite them for themselves, and our sailors experience and training, the prestige of the state from demonstrating in action an aircraft carrier.

[tolmachiev51]

- somehow they do not take root in our fleet !!! some problems.

[Arthur 85]

Hurry up. And so that more workouts.