Military Review

Israeli spy satellite showed pictures of "Russian airplanes, helicopters and radar" in Libya

102

In addition to the US African Military Command (AFRICOM), a company has joined the “revelations” from the “Russians in Libya” series, servicing Israeli ISI spy satellites.


Satellite images appeared in the social networks accounts associated with ISI, the captions to which tell us that "Russia has transferred to the Libyan air base Al-Jufra."

ISI Comment:

Intelligence demonstrates Russian military equipment at the Al-Jufrah air base, Libya. The expansion of the Russian presence includes MiG-29, MiG-23 fighters, trucks, helicopters, vehicles and a new radar.

In this regard, the Israeli spy satellite contradicts AFRICOM, which said that “MiG-29 fighters and Su-24 bombers were transferred to the Libyan Air Force” to Libya. Recall that the US African military command said that "the Russians repainted their combat aircraft at the Khmeimim airbase before being sent to Libya."




ISI Note, in which the spy satellite operator decides to refer to AFRICOM, which he has just actually contradicted:

According to the US African Command, military equipment is designed to support Russian state-sponsored PMCs operating locally in Libya.



Satellite photo showing the Mi-8 and Mi-24 helicopters:



In response to ISI, one of the users (Ahmed Hamad) left a remarkable comment (translated from English):

I knew this air base well, all these MiGs are old. They have been there since 1999, there are more than 20 of them.
Photos used:
Twitter / ImageSatIntl
102 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Doccor18
    Doccor18 28 May 2020 12: 24 New
    29
    What are they so squealing. Haftar crushed someone’s tail or something?
    1. Tatyana
      Tatyana 28 May 2020 12: 29 New
      11
      In response to ISI, one of the users (Ahmed Hamad) left a remarkable comment (translated from English):
      I knew this air base well, all these MiGs are old. They have been there since 1999, there are more than 20 of them.

      Still, the USA is able to goebbelsky with its anti-Russian lies in the world public consciousness to cast a shadow on the fence against the Russian Federation when Washington really needs it!
      1. kit88
        kit88 28 May 2020 12: 42 New
        10
        What is their own business?
        It is time for them to realize that the expression is again becoming relevant that the American military is interfering in the internal affairs of our country around the world.
        1. Break through
          Break through 28 May 2020 13: 04 New
          -5
          In vain, Israel creeps into Libya and blames us. Oh in vain.
          1. Doccor18
            Doccor18 28 May 2020 13: 21 New
            0
            What planes do the Israeli Air Force consist of? ... Everything needs to be worked out .... Everything ...
          2. ccsr
            ccsr 28 May 2020 13: 25 New
            +2
            Quote: Break through
            In vain, Israel creeps into Libya and blames us. Oh in vain.

            This is the style of their policy - they will gladly set fire to any fire in the Middle East, if only it does not directly affect them.
            Given the stuffing of this information, it becomes clear why they dream that we get stuck in the Middle East mess as much as possible, and they will only rub their pens.
            1. bayard
              bayard 28 May 2020 15: 20 New
              0
              The cherished goal of Israel and the United States in recent years is to push Russia and Turkey together. Let not war, so in a political clinch.
              Try hard. smile
              1. really
                really 28 May 2020 17: 25 New
                -3
                If Turkey knocks down a Russian plane it is Israel's fault, or the last demonstration of force by the Turks in Idlib
                1. bayard
                  bayard 28 May 2020 17: 48 New
                  +4
                  There (in Libya) there is no Russian aircraft. Let them bring down whoever they want.
                  Or are you again about the Su-24 in 2015?
                  I'm talking about the constant exaggeration of rumors, speculations and lies about repainted planes with stars, and the MiG-23 from the Russian VKS.
                  Israel and the United States benefit from Russia and Turkey quarreling, which is obvious. Therefore, the motivation for their body movements with fakes is quite obvious.
                  1. really
                    really 28 May 2020 18: 01 New
                    -4
                    You can start a company, we were not there, everyone is blaming us, talking about Soviet or Russian-made planes, it is clear that no one will serve them better than Russian specialists, and will not collect two out of three. The USSR and Libya have long-standing ties, and the next Libyan leader was in Moscow, and there were a lot of questions about the participant in the negotiations, and as you know, many people from their point of view think up the fact.
                    1. bayard
                      bayard 28 May 2020 18: 38 New
                      +8
                      Quote: really
                      You can start a company we were not there, everyone blames us

                      Why start something that doesn't make sense? request
                      Quote: really
                      talking about Soviet or Russian-made aircraft, it’s clear that no one will serve them better than Russian specialists, and will not collect two out of three

                      And how do dozens of countries cope? Operators of Russian and Soviet aircraft? Really yourself?
                      The MiG-29 has been shipped to many countries since the late 80s.
                      The MiG-23 has been supplied to no fewer countries since the 70s.
                      Do you think over the years no one has learned to service and operate them?
                      And yes, where did the very Su-24 go about that there was so much noise about?
                      Are they already gone?
                      Or wasn’t it?
                      Or for the Su-24 took the Libyan MiG-23?
                      They did not wipe the satellites with their lenses - was it not clearly visible?
                      The fact that journalists and politicians suck out sensations from the finger is understandable. But why duplicate and develop frank nonsense?
                      It is obvious that Russia will not carry out direct deliveries to the state under UN sanctions.
                      Right ?
                      It is obvious and well known that the sponsors of the Hawtor are the UAE, Egypt and France.
                      That the UAE supplies various types of weapons, equipment and ammunition from stocks of its own army and procuring for these supplies on the side. And he has the right to purchase the UAE. And in matters of supplies to Libya - it does not bother.
                      And everyone knows that.
                      As everyone knows, Egypt almost threatened the Turkish war for interfering in the conflict. Conducted relevant exercises and demonstrations. smile He shot courageous videos. yes He threatened to stoke Turkish ships and ships with weapons for Tripoli.
                      After all, do they know?
                      As you know, the Egyptian armament has, since some time, been equipped with a very fresh MiG-29.
                      So, after all the foregoing, can it be easier to assume that it was Egypt that transferred two or three MiG-29 links to cover the ally’s troops?
                      Do not find?
                      Or the fact that the UAE bought a batch of old MiG-29s in the secondary market (in Eastern Europe or Belarus) and delivered it to the Hawtor, do you want to assume?
                      Or the fact that, from allied considerations, Syria transferred part of its MiG-29 to Libya (which is unlikely) to help a friend?

                      After all, no one is blaming Israel for the fact that the Indians set bombs against them bombing Pakistanis?
                      Right ?
                      After all, they bought for this. smile

                      Russia is a great weapons power. Half of the world is fighting with Russian weapons - the same "Kalashnikovs" even on the emblems of some states.
                      And what, do we now blush for every shot in Africa?
                      You don’t blush for the "Uzi" delivered in 1988/89 to Nagorno-Karabakh?
                      Sure no.
                      So we have nothing to be ashamed of.
                      1. really
                        really 28 May 2020 19: 26 New
                        -2
                        So I actually wrote about this, noting that no one would do better than factory specialists, and the rest is just a thought-out considering the background.
      2. Mudavius
        Mudavius 28 May 2020 13: 14 New
        -14
        Quote: Tatiana
        Still, the USA is able to goebbelsky with its anti-Russian lies in the world public consciousness to cast a shadow on the fence against the Russian Federation when Washington really needs it!

        So yes Tatyana, but
        Israeli spy satellite showed pictures

        Most likely they bought from the Russian Ministry of Defense))) There are not so many satellites in Israel!
        You can kick everything .. hi
        1. really
          really 28 May 2020 18: 06 New
          -3
          Here they kick, rejoice
      3. Incvizitor
        Incvizitor 28 May 2020 15: 45 New
        +3
        Already connected satellites, but no one ever believes them either.
    2. letinant
      letinant 28 May 2020 13: 19 New
      +4
      In general, I hardly distinguish anything in these pictures.
      1. Grits
        Grits 28 May 2020 13: 37 New
        +9
        Quote: letinant
        In general, I hardly distinguish anything in these pictures.

        Even the Google Earth images are much clearer than those of the Israeli spies.
    3. Interlocutor
      Interlocutor 28 May 2020 14: 34 New
      0
      Well, definitely fill the air with the transfer of aircraft conveniently, and then around the coronavirus.
    4. Maz
      Maz 28 May 2020 21: 18 New
      +2
      And that I was not surprised by Israeli actions to support the American fake? Probably because the pictures are flawed and it’s just impossible to parse them. Like, well, we wrote on Facebook ... Shame on Israel. Unclean work at the level of the American mongrel. Like the owner said - it means the truth. I could have done this in Photoshop twenty years ago.
    5. Maz
      Maz 28 May 2020 21: 24 New
      +4
      The Pentagon powerfully sketched (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EY8If9vWAAAsL-B?format=jpg)about the Russian planes, as it were, in Libya. Also with photos (https://t.me/fotozak/175)!
      Our friend Alexander Ermakov (@nuclear_stormbringer) loves airplanes, and has considered the "proofs" in the most careful way.

      Today’s statement by the US AF African Command regarding the “Russian combat aircraft” deployed to Libya to help the Wagner Group PMC ™ raises conflicting feelings.

      On the one hand, the appearance of several MiG-29s and Su-24s at Libyan air bases controlled by Haftaru (we won’t specify the number, because there are options 4-6 of this order) is not news. The expert community found this in satellite images from May 19-20 without the help of the Pentagon. The conspiracy did not help much either because the Haftarsky voiced “the largest air campaign in history” and the transfer of reinforcements to Western news agencies on the same days. As for the aircraft themselves, there were different versions, from those transmitted by the Russian aerospace forces to the former Syrian or Belarusian (the latter was a particularly frequent option). National affiliation of pilots is also optional.

      The Pentagon, represented by AFRICOM, has been sleeping safely for a week, and it is only on May 26 that a "sensation" breaks out that Russian aircraft with painted over identification marks (this is an important point, remember!) Have been transferred to Libya. Since the command is African, it probably has a vague idea of ​​Belarus, and the planes were declared as categorically Russian. Without specifying the origin, but with multiple mentions of the insidious Wagner.

      But these are flowers, and a set of photo confirmations has become a real berry. From 15 images we can distinguish:
      - Two images of the MiG-29 with huge red stars;
      - two pictures of the MiG-29 without identification marks, moreover, it looks like "vanilla", which are difficult to find in our VKS;
      - two blurry frames, probably a pair of Su-24;
      - Two clear frames of the Su-24 with identification marks on the right places;
      - passenger Tu, probably Tu-154;
      - Su-34 with identification marks;
      - Su-35 with identification marks in place, clearly shot when accompanied by a patrol aircraft (EP-3 and P-8);
      - pictures probably from the U-2 or the drone, about the fact that four MiGs arrived at and departed to Khmeimim (with a pair of Su-35s); once (dates are smeared);
      - satellite image with one MiG-29 at the Libyan base of Al-Jufra;
      - something generally incomprehensible, some spots.

      Everything is removed, the devil knows when, but foolishly written in the media bank on 26.05.2020/XNUMX/XNUMX.

      Thus, only frames from U-2 and a satellite image from Libya are conditionally related to what is happening. How do they prove the transfer of disguised MiG-29s to Libya, the Su-34 with the stars or Carcass - we are lost in conjecture.

      Why are we all this? No, not to the fact that there was definitely no transfer of several aircraft (though most likely not from the Russian Air Force) to Libya. This is to the general degradation of the media services of the relevant ministries.

      But they did not forget to write in the conclusions of the press release that the Russian bridgehead in Libya is the path to building the A2 / AD zone and a threat to the entire southern flank of Europe. That unpleasant moment when USEUCOM receives money to deter Russian, and you also want to eat. Briefly - stuffing and now Israel is all in the American poop of this stuffing.
    6. Lister
      Lister 29 May 2020 01: 23 New
      18
      Quote: Doccor18
      What are they so squealing.

      We felt that the fried smell for them, and here they squealed. And in order to hide their helplessness in the Libyan issue, Russia was blamed as always.
  2. Operator
    Operator 28 May 2020 12: 27 New
    +7
    The Israeli-AFRICOM statement on the MiG-23 of the Russian Aerospace Forces was especially delivered. bully
    1. bk316
      bk316 28 May 2020 14: 14 New
      +2
      statement on the MiG-23 VKS of the Russian Federation

      So I read it and hung straight. He has long been withdrawn from service in the Russian Federation, but not in Libya .....
      1. Lister
        Lister 29 May 2020 01: 24 New
        20
        Quote: bk316
        long removed from service in the Russian Federation

        But they still removed it from our armament or not. For them, the main thing is to blame, but there at least the grass does not grow ...
  3. Thrifty
    Thrifty 28 May 2020 12: 27 New
    +9
    Well, thank God, even though the Death Star was not noticed, we sniffed it well lol (am I not sick of something superfluous belay repeat ?) lol
  4. bober1982
    bober1982 28 May 2020 12: 28 New
    +2
    Russian MiG-23 also managed to repaint, increasing the Russian presence in Libya.
    Intelligence claims so.
    1. Grits
      Grits 28 May 2020 13: 39 New
      +2
      Quote: bober1982
      Russian MiG-23 also managed to repaint

      Before that, having managed to search for their remnants and spare parts at airfields, assemble and repair. We need to know, at the Uglovaya aerodrome near Vladivostok, they accidentally were not removed from the pedestal? And it’s a pity - there was a good monument - and to Libya ...
      1. bober1982
        bober1982 28 May 2020 13: 52 New
        0
        Good news (from 02.12.2015g.)
        Samara Plant Aircraft Unit will erect a monument to the legendary MiG-23 fighter
        The monument will be installed on the Factory Highway.
        Bad news (from 28.05.2020g.)
        The monument was never installed on the Factory Highway.
        Apparently, and not to find the legendary fighter, even in disassembled form.
        1. bk316
          bk316 28 May 2020 14: 15 New
          -2
          Samara Plant Aircraft Unit at

          And I know where there are 23, but it is also in the form of a monument ..... Half in concrete.
          1. bober1982
            bober1982 28 May 2020 14: 22 New
            -1
            Quote: bk316
            Half in concrete

            It is so protected from hooligans that we have for the people.
  5. knn54
    knn54 28 May 2020 12: 29 New
    0
    Didn't you find the Iron Dome complexes?
  6. Piramidon
    Piramidon 28 May 2020 12: 29 New
    10
    Jews drew on a dance. The overlord gave the command, the vassal performed.
  7. svp67
    svp67 28 May 2020 12: 30 New
    +9
    Some kind of nonsense ... well, the MiG-29, but where did the efficient MiG-23s come from now, and most importantly, what is their combat effectiveness there now? And as I understand it, they beguiled them with the Su-24 ... Well, it’s all unlike the Israelis. They always worked better, but there are so many mistakes. The span is unknown which group, and the range of the MiG-29 does not allow it to be done without refueling, where and when, they could not understand the same for a long time, they have now speculated ... And this, having serious agents throughout the Middle East ... here it’s especially no satellites needed
    1. Aaron Zawi
      Aaron Zawi 28 May 2020 12: 33 New
      -16
      Quote: svp67
      Some kind of nonsense ... well, the MiG-29, but where did the efficient MiG-23s come from now, and most importantly, what is their combat effectiveness there now?

      If you can still find new PPSh in your warehouses, then why aren't there a dozen MiG-23s? And this car is much more familiar to Libyan pilots than for example the Su-24.
      1. bober1982
        bober1982 28 May 2020 12: 42 New
        17
        Quote: Aron Zaavi
        then why a dozen MiG-23 is not found?

        The MiG-23 cannot be found in our "warehouses" even for aviation museums or monuments.
        Do not make laugh.
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. Grits
          Grits 28 May 2020 13: 42 New
          +1
          Quote: bober1982
          MiG-23 in our "warehouses" can not be found even for aviation museums or monuments

          I know such a monument in Primorye
      2. g1v2
        g1v2 28 May 2020 12: 50 New
        +4
        Because instant23 has long been cut. Aircraft do not live with us long after decommissioning, so they don’t store junk at all already. But Su 24 removed from service, could easily fit them. Mig 29, too, is gradually written off, so selling them is also logical.
        1. donavi49
          donavi49 28 May 2020 13: 38 New
          -2
          Well, look 2017 officially officially, under the sauce of the fight against the Islamic State (then it was strong in Libya):
          Russia delivered MiG-23 fighters for aviation of the Libyan National Army, Marshal Khalifa Haftar
          Two of the three MiG-23s received by Libya from Russia during assembly in Benghazi




          In general - if you started pumping up Haftar, then the first thing to do is return the MiG-21 (probably Egypt is already scraping through the gimbal) and the MiG-23 into operation to the maximum. For this is the flight crew for which there are service staff and pilots, as well as the ability to quickly train pilots (they are already studying in Egypt - in 2018-19 there were many pictures of Libyan pilots in Egypt).

          Probably activity with MiGs-23, which were considered firewood, was regarded as a supply of new ones. Personally, I am inclined that active efforts are being made to raise the maximum number of equipment and put it into operation. Using cannibalization in the world and redemption of parts from the secondary, by the UAE.

          Moreover, the latter actively began to charter equipment. Of the last An-32s, the Tajik Asia Sky Lines is already flying actively in Libya and was lit up on video photos.
          1. figwam
            figwam 28 May 2020 14: 24 New
            +7
            Quote: donavi49
            Russia delivered MiG-23 fighters for aviation of the Libyan National Army

            Do not mislead people.
            Aircraft were delivered as donors for spare parts. In this case, the rear of the Soviet Mig-23 was delivered to the Libyan Mig-23UB.
            1. donavi49
              donavi49 28 May 2020 15: 13 New
              -3
              3 aircraft were delivered. They were used as donors in cannibalism. wink .

              Two of the three MiG-23s received by Libya from Russia during assembly in Benghazi
              This is a signature photo from LJ BMPD like.
          2. g1v2
            g1v2 28 May 2020 16: 36 New
            0
            There was infa that specialists came to Benghazi to repair Haftar's equipment. Maybe Mig23 also patched up on the spot.
      3. askort154
        askort154 28 May 2020 13: 06 New
        +2
        Aron Zaavi ...If you can still find new PPSh in your warehouses, then why not a dozen MiG-23s?

        Do not blah, blah! MiG - 23 has long been gone, even in Ukraine.
      4. Alexey RA
        Alexey RA 28 May 2020 13: 26 New
        14
        Quote: Aron Zaavi
        If you can still find new PPSh in your warehouses, then why aren't there a dozen MiG-23s?

        Because for PPSh we can provide storage conditions. But for airplanes - no. When they wanted to put MiG-27 from storage before the First Chechen War, it turned out that the planes turned into scrap metal.
        We do not have conditions like at AB "Davis-Monten" - the isotherm spoils everything.
      5. ccsr
        ccsr 28 May 2020 13: 29 New
        +7
        Quote: Aron Zaavi
        If you still can find new PPSh in your warehouses,

        Lies - their reserves back in the 60-70s went to the aid of different countries.
        Quote: Aron Zaavi
        then why a dozen MiG-23 is not found

        This is an expensive equipment and it is too expensive for someone to maintain it - it is not a machine in the warehouse, planes must be constantly serviced.
        Quote: Aron Zaavi
        And this car is much more familiar to Libyan pilots than for example the Su-24.

        And for this we must contain decommissioned equipment? You, with your cunning, look rather primitive in matters of armaments and military equipment.
      6. Vasyan1971
        Vasyan1971 28 May 2020 13: 34 New
        0
        Quote: Aron Zaavi
        If in your warehouses still brand new PPSh can be found

        But do not poke his nose on our warehouses!
      7. svp67
        svp67 28 May 2020 13: 36 New
        +4
        Quote: Aron Zaavi
        If you can still find new PPSh in your warehouses, then why aren't there a dozen MiG-23s?

        It will be found, of course it will be ... at the sites of the division for colormet ... and then almost none. They were still heavily replaced by the MiG-29 in Soviet times. And now their massive sites, such as in Turkmenistan and Kyrgyzstan, still remain, but they are not combat ready.
        There is no sense in reanimating them now. MiG-29 is enough, and there’s nothing to retrain pilots on it
    2. donavi49
      donavi49 28 May 2020 13: 08 New
      0
      Well, what's the point of clinging to little things and lamer? These are the local MiG-23s that have been there throughout the war. Some firewood, some fly (2-3).



      They still have old MiG-21s from Egypt, by the way. Which, back in the years 2017-18, were presented with a gentleman's shoulder. And even in the classical Egyptian livery.

      Monument in Egypt
  8. donavi49
    donavi49 28 May 2020 12: 31 New
    +3
    These are satellites of a private trader - ImageSat International. By the way, Eros from which photos were displayed by Roscosmos rockets. The company is generally legally from the Netherlands.

    They take photos of any interesting events (well, for which they will pay). True, things are not going very well, since updated satellites with 30cm resolution still cannot be assembled.

    For example, they took pictures of the Turkish UDC.


    Here is a Chinese aircraft carrier


    Here are more Chinese patrol aircraft deployed in the islands.


    Here are the tankers that went to Venezuela
    1. Volodin
      Volodin 28 May 2020 12: 45 New
      17
      And only Israeli nuclear facilities will not see in any way - what kind of optics do they have ... useless ...
      1. Piramidon
        Piramidon 28 May 2020 13: 20 New
        +7
        Quote: Volodin
        this is what kind of optics they have ... useless ...

        If you discerned that it was the Russian aerospace forces, that means optics are good for them. There, in the pictures, even passports with a Tambov registration can be considered. laughing
        1. svp67
          svp67 28 May 2020 13: 38 New
          +3
          Quote: Piramidon
          There, in the pictures, even passports with a Tambov registration can be considered.

          And they were immediately spotted by Ukrainian "experts"
      2. Alexey RA
        Alexey RA 28 May 2020 13: 29 New
        +2
        Quote: Volodin
        And only Israeli nuclear facilities will not see in any way - what kind of optics do they have ... useless ...

        It's just that no one can outbid Israel's bid to "not publish a photo." smile
      3. svp67
        svp67 28 May 2020 13: 37 New
        +4
        Quote: Volodin
        And only Israeli nuclear facilities will not see in any way - what kind of optics do they have ... useless ...

        "Resolution" cameras do not allow ... too "small" objects.
      4. Vasyan1971
        Vasyan1971 28 May 2020 13: 38 New
        0
        Quote: Volodin
        this is what kind of optics they have ... useless ...

        Racially correct. In a stranger's eye, he will notice nanosorin; he will not identify the baobab in his log.
      5. Grits
        Grits 28 May 2020 13: 47 New
        0
        Quote: Volodin
        this is what kind of optics they have ... useless ...

        There, in this optics, the log immediately gets stuck as soon as it hits its objects
    2. Vitaly gusin
      Vitaly gusin 28 May 2020 13: 28 New
      +1
      Quote: donavi49
      ImageSat International. By the way, Eros from which photos were displayed by Roscosmos rockets. The company is generally legally from the Netherlands.

      Not certainly in that way
      Address:
      Kaufman 2, Tel Aviv 61500, Israel
      Phone:
      972-3-7960600
      Fax:
      972-3-5163430
      Email:
      [email protected]
      ImageSat International's tracking station, located in Sweden in Kiruna.
      Quote: donavi49
      True, things are not going very well, since updated satellites with 30cm resolution still cannot be collected.

      At this stage, they cope with the tasks that are set and you see the results.
      Probably heard your wishes.
      ImageSat has announced plans to launch a total of more than three satellites at a later date in order to provide full coverage of the entire planet’s surface with six functional satellites.
  9. Andrei Nikolaevich
    Andrei Nikolaevich 28 May 2020 12: 39 New
    -1
    We have good friends,)
  10. Vitaly Tsymbal
    Vitaly Tsymbal 28 May 2020 12: 40 New
    0
    Poor Russia))) They did not find money for American paint (here the Americans are indignant), and so all the little things ... Well, at least they bought paint from Israel, otherwise these "bad Russians" are masked with tricolor))) Yes, instead of dogs, bears brought with them ,,, and what !!! Israel's all-seeing eye did not notice the bears ??? Then they lie, if there were bears, as if they were Russians))))
    1. GMM
      GMM 28 May 2020 13: 15 New
      -3
      Despite the many brackets you indicated where you need to laugh, I didn’t cause a smile in the style of Petrosyan.
      You need to work on yourself or go into another genre, into another copycat ...
      1. Vitaly Tsymbal
        Vitaly Tsymbal 28 May 2020 13: 50 New
        -2
        Oh))) Earlier they wrote to me about spelling Ashibki .... Now they compare with Petrosyan))) - growth !!!! Thank God, all people are different !!!! The world has not converged on you like a wedge ... or you are still the one to whom all the humorists of the world are "equal" ... You, dear, should first figure out what humor is and what malice is !!! I do not pretend to be Petrosyans, but I sneer at stupidity))) especially when stupidity is designed for stupid .... stupidity is when people who think (and not read) try to shove an unsubstantiated "highlighted" into their brains ...
    2. Vitaly gusin
      Vitaly gusin 28 May 2020 15: 26 New
      -1
      Quote: Vitaly Tsymbal
      The all-seeing eye of Israel did not notice the bears ??? Then they lie, if there were bears,

      It’s not calm with the copper-bears, but the wild boars have already appeared.
      1. Vitaly Tsymbal
        Vitaly Tsymbal 28 May 2020 16: 54 New
        0
        Is it because of self-isolation? or from ecology? Or there is no one to shoot - everyone went "to the front"))) A flock of wild boars will be more dangerous than bears both for humans and for the economy in particular.
        1. Vitaly gusin
          Vitaly gusin 28 May 2020 20: 39 New
          -2
          Quote: Vitaly Tsymbal
          Is it because of self-isolation?

          Yes, because of self-isolation and there were almost days that were allowed to leave the house for 100 meters, they used to walk occasionally at night.
          Quote: Vitaly Tsymbal
          Or there is no one to shoot - everyone went "to the front"

          It’s easier and easier to shoot yourself; cheaper it will be forbidden to touch animals.
          When the circus arrives, only artists no animals Kuklachev was allowed only once, menageries with cells are forbidden, animals only in aviaries in safari.
          Quote: Vitaly Tsymbal
          A flock of wild boars is more dangerous for bears than for humans, and especially for the economy.

          Damage to huge potato fields is plowed during the night, sometimes they are allowed to shoot, sometimes they are fed so that they do not climb onto the fields. By the way, for the winter, hundreds of thousands of cranes remain so that they would not fly to the fields they are also brought in corn grain and there is no damage from them.

          Well, at the expense of the danger "Only from the life of a dog can a dog be biting"
          When animals are fed, unlike people, they understand that you can’t leave it without food.

          1. Vitaly Tsymbal
            Vitaly Tsymbal 28 May 2020 21: 55 New
            +2
            Thank! Interesting! The world is diverse, you will not see this as a tourist !!!!
      2. mvg
        mvg 28 May 2020 17: 41 New
        0
        Such cutlets go, but everyone does not care ... What doesn’t eat stew in Israel?
        1. Vitaly gusin
          Vitaly gusin 28 May 2020 22: 54 New
          -1
          Quote: mvg
          Such cutlets go,

          It’s easier and tastier.

          And let them live. It's nice to see wildlife next to them.
  11. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 28 May 2020 12: 45 New
    +2
    Doccor18
    What are they so squealing.
    So they did not stop. Especially when it comes to BV and North Africa (Egypt, Libya). But the fact that under the leadership of the United States launched a new information company against Russia is a fact. When he presses Netanyahu from Moscow he doesn’t get out, and how to spoil the Russians must be one of the first to sing along.
    I am pleased to praise Israel for its attitude towards May 9, for the historical justice of the period of 2 MB, but often reduces cheekbones from their actions.
    1. Iris
      Iris 28 May 2020 13: 38 New
      +4
      .. and how to play Russian is necessary right there one of the first at the hype.

      ISI is a PRIVATE company, in Israel (as far as I know) the government does not solve the problem of controlling the publications of commercial firms. At the STATE level, however, no statements were made on the Russian presence in Libya. Regrettably (and perhaps fortunately) about "messing with" the official way - everything is just the opposite: From today and further into the past, as far as the eye can see, Israel did not join the anti-Russian measures - neither to European and American actions, neither the position on Crimea, nor the statements on the Donbass, nor the assessments of the Venezuelan events - in a word, to nothing. On the contrary, there is NOT a SINGLE vote with our participation - from UNESCO to the UN Security Council - where we would not oppose Israel on any issue under discussion. Even on such an important topic for Israel as the historical and cultural identity of Jerusalem, they voted for an anti-Israeli resolution, they did not even abstain. So I look at the Israelis and think - the guys have strong nerves ..
      1. Doliva63
        Doliva63 28 May 2020 18: 50 New
        0
        Quote: Iris
        .. and how to play Russian is necessary right there one of the first at the hype.

        ISI is a PRIVATE company, in Israel (as far as I know) the government does not solve the problem of controlling the publications of commercial firms. At the STATE level, however, no statements were made on the Russian presence in Libya. Regrettably (and perhaps fortunately) about "messing with" the official way - everything is just the opposite: From today and further into the past, as far as the eye can see, Israel did not join the anti-Russian measures - neither to European and American actions, neither the position on Crimea, nor the statements on the Donbass, nor the assessments of the Venezuelan events - in a word, to nothing. On the contrary, there is NOT a SINGLE vote with our participation - from UNESCO to the UN Security Council - where we would not oppose Israel on any issue under discussion. Even on such an important topic for Israel as the historical and cultural identity of Jerusalem, they voted for an anti-Israeli resolution, they did not even abstain. So I look at the Israelis and think - the guys have strong nerves ..

        They have not nerves, but strong ties with their homeland laughing
  12. Ka-52
    Ka-52 28 May 2020 12: 48 New
    +4
    the funny thing is that most of the equipment being transferred to Haftaru is of Saudi origin. Can the Americans really not know what their political and military allies are doing? Or again the same principle as in Iraq and Yugoslavia: misinformation will then be revealed later, but it will be later. Then, when no one will be interested. And now the main thing is to again suck out an occasion to show the aggressive imperial Russian policy!
  13. novel66
    novel66 28 May 2020 12: 49 New
    +2
    APA I don’t see, but without it ... and the plane is not a plane
    1. Piramidon
      Piramidon 28 May 2020 13: 14 New
      0
      Quote: novel xnumx
      APA I don’t see, but without it ... and the plane is not a plane

      Centralized food.
  14. rocket757
    rocket757 28 May 2020 12: 50 New
    +3
    So then a meaningless, empty fuss, BUT, the sediment then remains.
    1. askort154
      askort154 28 May 2020 13: 15 New
      +2
      rocket757 ....So then a meaningless, empty fuss, BUT, the sediment then remains.


      Yeah. In the 20th century, the media unofficially called it the 4th power, and they got so bad that in the 21st century they claim to be 2nd after the "nuclear triad".
      And in the "fight against coronavirus", it is clearly in the first place. hi
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 28 May 2020 13: 29 New
        0
        Quote: askort154
        And in the "fight against coronavirus", it is clearly in the first place.

        this sphere has grown and the influence on society, the layman, it has a specific!
        to be honest, quite often there is a desire to attach, if not to all, then to many, the label "THIS IS THE ENEMY" ...
        something like this has already happened, but how it goes one can only guess ... br r p r!
  15. Grandfather Crimea
    Grandfather Crimea 28 May 2020 13: 30 New
    -1
    The excitement is like a coronovirus, it is there, but it is not visible and it also looks weird
  16. askort154
    askort154 28 May 2020 13: 30 New
    +1
    askort154 .....Israeli spy satellite showed pictures of "Russian planes, helicopters and radar" in Libya

    And here is what the US Defense Ministry spokesman, Jonathan Hoffman, said yesterday
    at his press conference on this subject. We have no reason to call these aircraft the Russian Aerospace Forces, and limited ourselves to the phrase - these are Russian-made aircraft.
  17. alean245
    alean245 28 May 2020 13: 32 New
    +1
    Russian instant 23 is cool. At this pace, I think soon some Georgian reconnaissance aircraft will find in Libya the work of the Russian Muromites under cover of the I-15 and I-16.
  18. Pavel57
    Pavel57 28 May 2020 13: 49 New
    -1
    You don’t understand - either they took the Su-24 for the MiG-23, or vice versa.
    1. bk316
      bk316 28 May 2020 14: 21 New
      -4
      You don’t understand - either they took the Su-24 for the MiG-23, or vice versa.

      Yes, what is there to understand, there were 23 Libyan 10 years ..... And we probably have no pilots who flew on them ... They were replaced by the USSR.
  19. sergo1914
    sergo1914 28 May 2020 13: 51 New
    -2
    Snitches ...
  20. APASUS
    APASUS 28 May 2020 13: 55 New
    +2
    Interesting pictures. There is an impression that they were published for noise in the media, the resolution was specifically reduced to the point that the model of technology and condition would not be understood. And this comment is just about the topic:
    I knew this air base well, all these MiGs are old. They have been there since 1999, there are more than 20 of them.
  21. sleeve
    sleeve 28 May 2020 13: 58 New
    -2
    What happens to VO "passports"? What kind of reasoning where did they come from, could they not find? Where is the discussion on another, important topic? We, our country, have been charged with the illegal participation of our Armed Forces in an unauthorized military confrontation on the side of the "non-handshake" and therefore illegal formations. "Shows" are thrown by the organs of the Armed Forces of our sworn friends, that is, officials. While the rest of the pyramid is looking closely at the blah, blah, blah process. But what is being presented can be interpreted as "state terrorism". We can not only be deprived of the veto right, but even be overrun by the UN Security Council. Russophobia and genocide by citizenship will immediately become "international law". Where is the Foreign Ministry? Where is the collision "towards"? Already in every iron the "correct" version should sound where the "numbers" came from at the airbase, who sits at the helm, who has the "hurray, attack" button. What kind of Simpsons with airplanes is that? The fourth day, if I'm not mistaken already ...
    1. sleeve
      sleeve 28 May 2020 13: 59 New
      +1
      I'm in a hurry. Sorry. We will change the "passports" for "experts".
  22. Runoway
    Runoway 28 May 2020 14: 19 New
    +2

    They are satellites fellow there are many puzzles
    1. donavi49
      donavi49 28 May 2020 15: 16 New
      -1
      This is not a mystery, but a bug of Google’s photo-gluing algorithm. You can find a lot of this. Because photos are not always updated with a piece on the object, sometimes half of the object say the photo is 2017, and the second one is 2019. And from here artifacts.

      Immediately fotaly specially this AB, specially made for this by the Eros satellite with high definition, for individual objects.
      1. Oquzyurd
        Oquzyurd 28 May 2020 20: 16 New
        0
        An example, the Minister of Malta came to Tripoli, concluded a mutual assistance agreement with Saraj. I can’t understand whether Malta is the hand of Britain (knew that they were with the British) or France (some say they are French) in these parts?
  23. Evil 55
    Evil 55 28 May 2020 14: 24 New
    0
    Yeah .... Directly inflatable and repainted .. Especially so that "everyone" flew and looked ...
  24. Unclebens
    Unclebens 28 May 2020 14: 56 New
    +2
    And where was all this armada of reconnaissance, highly accurate satellites, both Israeli and American, when the Boeing was shot down over the Donbass?
  25. donavi49
    donavi49 28 May 2020 15: 26 New
    -3
    It seems that MiGs have already been leaked on the stage through Syria.



    Old men, not SMT and not Egyptians. By livery, you can determine the source.
  26. Klingon
    Klingon 28 May 2020 15: 54 New
    0
    Well, how can I do without Izi? Izya harnessed here too wassat
  27. Miron
    Miron 28 May 2020 17: 03 New
    -2
    "Israeli spy satellite showed images of" Russian planes, helicopters and radar "in Libya"
    ***
    Israel does not have a satellite that can show something over Libya.
    For the rest, only one thing confuses why Russia did not hit a hostile satellite that interferes with hostilities.
    1. really
      really 28 May 2020 18: 08 New
      0
      If you personally do not have a satellite, this does not say that others do not
  28. Kuzkin Batyan
    Kuzkin Batyan 29 May 2020 04: 29 New
    0
    Resolution kapets. On Yandex cards, it’s much better.
  29. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  30. Dimid
    Dimid 29 May 2020 19: 37 New
    0
    Quote: bayard
    in Eastern Europe or in Belarus

    Let’s say correctly - Belarus. Or, if you really don’t have any, then the old-fashioned way is Belarus. But in essence of your post - reasonable reasoning, it may even be so ..