Rogozin: We will not repeat the moon exploration program for the Americans


Two years ago, Dmitry Rogozin headed the state-owned corporation Roscosmos. Much has been done during this time, and more needs to be done.


Today, from 11.00 on this topic, the head of "Roskosmos" talked live with journalists Radio "Komsomolskaya Pravda".

Media representatives were interested in when the Russian cosmonauts would begin to explore the moon, and were there any plans at all.

Dmitry Rogozin said in this regard that Russia does not intend to copy the American program for the exploration of the moon. He believes that the Soviet Union had already made a similar mistake when it decided to repeat the US Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) program, unofficially called the Star Wars program:

We should not jerk in the way that, unfortunately, the Soviet Union once reacted to the strategic defense initiative, when tremendous money was actually thrown at a fantastic idea, which, as a result, was not realized.

Rogozin believes that Roscosmos should act more pragmatically, since Russia simply does not have such funds that the Americans can afford to spend on space Wishlist.


The head of Roskosmos said that now our country has its own lunar program, which is being implemented in stages.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

315 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Jack O'Neill 25 May 2020 14: 20 New
    • 33
    • 69
    -36
    Well, Rogozin is right. Americans can afford a lot more, in view of the fact that more money is corny.
    But to master along with the Americans, it is much cheaper, and in both directions. So we need to cooperate!
    1. poquello 25 May 2020 14: 28 New
      • 23
      • 2
      +21
      Quote: Jack O'Neill
      to master together with the Americans, then much cheaper, and in both directions. So we need to cooperate!

      ? Rogozin said that Russia has its own plans, and many of them do not seem to provide for cooperation with the United States.
      1. Jack O'Neill 25 May 2020 14: 30 New
        • 12
        • 16
        -4
        ? Rogozin said that Russia has its own plans, and many of them do not seem to provide for cooperation with the United States.

        There are different plans, and plans change.
      2. Sklendarka 25 May 2020 14: 53 New
        • 9
        • 2
        +7
        ,, .. real heroes always go around "
        ,, ... on dusty roads
        distant planets
        our tracks will remain ... "
        1. poquello 25 May 2020 15: 02 New
          • 5
          • 1
          +4
          Quote: Skalendarka
          , .. real heroes always go around "

          everyone decides to the best of his understanding, when in front of a person, for example, a ditch - he has seven options for action
          1. Sklendarka 25 May 2020 15: 22 New
            • 4
            • 1
            +3
            The film ,, Aibolit 66 ", where the heroes always went around ...
            1. Avior 25 May 2020 16: 33 New
              • 9
              • 4
              +5
              but we never turn a curve

              And it will be necessary - we will again go along the curve!
              smile
      3. Fan-fan 25 May 2020 15: 49 New
        • 42
        • 14
        +28
        Rogozin said

        Spit and forget what he said. And it’s better not to pay attention at all, since he can only blurt out some nonsense similar to the famous “Trampoline”. Except how can he say something else and can not.
        They found, damn it, the head of Roscosmos, about the same as the head of sports Mutko. Yes, they are managers of the same level there.
        1. mark2 25 May 2020 16: 14 New
          • 7
          • 7
          0
          But the day after tomorrow we will find out whether a trampoline is required or not. Mask is going to launch two gaiters into space. Something all fell silent. Wait.
        2. Reserve officer 26 May 2020 00: 48 New
          • 21
          • 3
          +18
          In fact, Rogozin is simply not allowed to talk about the alleged mistakes of the USSR in space programs. He is not Korolev, not Glushko, not Ustinov. He is a journalist caught in a career stream.
          And he has no moral right to say anything about criticizing the space programs of the USSR. He is not a specialist, he is a random person in this industry. Its ceiling is a leading television show.
          1. Misha Honest 26 May 2020 03: 14 New
            • 14
            • 4
            +10
            About 5 years ago I bombed about Rogozin and GDP - as it was and remains. Two morons is power. (((
            1. Misha Honest 26 May 2020 03: 26 New
              • 10
              • 6
              +4
              For me personally, GDP = Yeltsin.
              1. fider 26 May 2020 11: 54 New
                • 2
                • 1
                +1
                Misha Honest
                So already three?
                1. Misha Honest 1 June 2020 17: 15 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  In fact, there are approximately 20-30 million of them in the Russian Federation. Those whom Comrade Beria called "enemies of the people." If not 60)
          2. Simargl 26 May 2020 08: 26 New
            • 3
            • 1
            +2
            Quote: Stock Officer
            In fact, Rogozin is simply not allowed to talk about the alleged mistakes of the USSR in space programs.
            And to confuse development (bases, stations, a long stay and a program for many years) and conquest (lurking, stuck a flag, scored stones and go home) - it’s somehow weak for a journalist.
      4. Sling cutter 25 May 2020 16: 00 New
        • 27
        • 13
        +14
        Quote: poquello
        ? Rogozin said that Russia has its own plans, and many of them do not seem to provide for cooperation with the United States.

        if Ragozin did not say anything at all, then there would be more benefit from him.
        1. poquello 25 May 2020 16: 09 New
          • 14
          • 22
          -8
          Quote: Stroporez
          if Ragozin did not say anything at all, then there would be more benefit from him.

          no matter what he says, everything goes on as usual, but in general his words do not differ much from the process, adjusted for thick circumstances such as various sanctions and other bourgeois counteractions
          1. Sling cutter 25 May 2020 16: 18 New
            • 34
            • 16
            +18
            Quote: poquello
            no matter what he says, everything goes on as usual, but in general his words do not differ much from the process, adjusted for thick circumstances such as various sanctions and other bourgeois counteractions

            In any case, bourgeois Musk is more preferable to me than bourgeois ragozin. One rocket launches, and the other balabol trampoline.
            1. orionvitt 25 May 2020 20: 00 New
              • 14
              • 14
              0
              Quote: Stroporez
              One rocket launches, and the other balabol trampoline.

              I don’t know what Musk launches there, it's their business. But "trampolines", Americans are delivered to the ISS. And on a regular basis.
              1. Simargl 26 May 2020 08: 51 New
                • 2
                • 3
                -1
                Quote: orionvitt
                I don’t know what Musk launches there, it's their business.
                The problem is in perspective: they have relied on cheaper launches. It may be that it will be cheaper to buy flights from them. Not in this iteration, but with the stuck Federated Eagle ...
                1. orionvitt 26 May 2020 13: 13 New
                  • 3
                  • 2
                  +1
                  Quote: Simargl
                  they relied on cheaper launches.

                  Nonsense. Space has always been unprofitable, in monetary terms, at least. No private corporation will ever pull a space program without state subsidies. (They even have farmers on subsidies laughing ) What are they doing in the USA? Very comfortably. In case of failure, the private trader will always be to blame, and not a government structure like NASA. And it’s easier for officials to take a break.
                  it will be cheaper to buy flights from them
                  If you have not noticed, then I remind you that no one has flown anywhere. But the seats on the "Union", the Americans requested two years in advance. Maybe they know better than us what they have there and how.
                  1. Simargl 26 May 2020 19: 42 New
                    • 1
                    • 2
                    -1
                    Quote: orionvitt
                    Nonsense. Space has always been unprofitable, in monetary terms, at least.
                    Uh ... a trip to the Arctic has always been unprofitable ... until they opened the NSR ...
                    In general, I wrote:
                    Quote: Simargl
                    it will be cheaper to buy flights from them


                    Quote: orionvitt
                    No private corporation will ever pull a space program without state subsidies.
                    This is until space begins to bring income.

                    Quote: orionvitt
                    If you have not noticed, then I remind you that no one has flown anywhere.
                    Yes Yes! And they did not fly to the moon, and the Shuttle did not fly.
                    Their goal is to make cheap and cheerful. It was already expensive and very angry. However, all options are approximately equal in price to ours; this is enough for them to dump.
                    Do you think they will not succeed? It will work out.

                    Quote: orionvitt
                    Maybe they know better than us what they have there and how.
                    So Roscosmos is going to reserve places on the Dragon. We don’t know something?
            2. slipped 25 May 2020 20: 55 New
              • 14
              • 2
              +12
              Quote: Stroporez
              One rocket launches, and the other balabol trampoline.


              On May 22, the Soyuz-2.1b space rocket with the Frigate upper stage was launched from the Plesetsk Cosmodrome.



              The fourth spacecraft of the Unified Missile Attack Warning System "Dome" has been launched into orbit.

              Here, in VO, by the way, there was not a word about this. lol

              This would be Russia's seventh successful launch this year. In addition, preparations are underway for the next launch. laughing
              1. keeper03 26 May 2020 10: 30 New
                • 3
                • 1
                +2
                Hurray, comrades !!! fellow yes good soldier
                So let's drink for stability! drinks
            3. mikhailovich22 25 May 2020 21: 26 New
              • 9
              • 5
              +4
              Quote: Stroporez
              In any case, bourgeois Musk is more preferable to me than bourgeois ragozin. One rocket launches, and the other balabol trampoline.

              Bourgeois Musk in 2020 launched, at the moment, 6 rockets and bourgeois Rolozin 7 rockets.
              I didn’t hear that the Americans were flying into space on their spaceship, so while they are flying on the Rogozin trampoline.
              1. Simargl 26 May 2020 09: 08 New
                • 2
                • 5
                -3
                Quote: mikhailovich22
                Bourgeois Musk in 2020 launched, at the moment, 6 rockets and bourgeois Rolozin 7 rockets.
                The bourgeois USA has Musk, NASA, Lockheed with the Martin, Boeing, and the Orbital Science Corporation, and Russia ... Roscoskos and S-7 (which only intends to launch something there). So you only need to compare the Mask with the whole Roskosmos. So, the USA has 10 launches, against our 7, at the moment.
                1. slipped 27 May 2020 04: 14 New
                  • 2
                  • 0
                  +2
                  Quote: Simargl
                  The bourgeois United States has Mask, and NASA, and Lockheed with the Martin, and Boeing, and the Orbital Science Corporation, and Russia ...
                  Roscoskos and S-7 (which only intends to launch something there).


                  Roscosmos includes 76 enterprises and organizations that are no worse in terms of competence of Boeing, Lockheed Martins and other Grummans.

                  Quote: Simargl
                  So you only need to compare the Mask with the whole Roskosmos.


                  But why? laughing he will always be behind in launches from the whole Roskosmos. You better compare the Mask with Lockheed and Martin or Boeing. laughing

                  Quote: Simargl
                  So, the USA has 10 launches, against our 7, at the moment.


                  and it would have been more if it had not been for the six-month shutdown of the Guiana Space Center in Kura due to a virus (two launches of Soyuz-2 were postponed to the second half of the year) and questions with the British company OneWeb (also two launches of Soyuz-2 were gone to the right).
                  1. Simargl 27 May 2020 04: 49 New
                    • 0
                    • 1
                    -1
                    Quote: slipped
                    Roscosmos includes 76 enterprises and organizations that are no worse in terms of competence of Boeing, Lockheed Martins and other Grummans.
                    What am I talking about? Compare one of с state corporationwhich carries out all launches in the country at the moment.
                    Quote: slipped
                    What for? he will always be behind in launches from the whole Roskosmos.
                    I don’t know either, that's why I wrote
                    Quote: Simargl
                    only Mask with whole Roskosmos

                    Quote: slipped
                    but it would be more if not for the closure of the Guiana Space Center
                    The problem is that Guiana is ESA wassat ... and even then - 9 against 10.
                    On the other hand, then you can count 3 Atlas-5 drinks laughing
                    1. slipped 27 May 2020 12: 34 New
                      • 0
                      • 0
                      0
                      Quote: Simargl
                      Quote: slipped
                      but it would be more if not for the closure of the Guiana Space Center
                      The problem is that Guiana is ESA wassat .


                      This is a commercial sale of missiles with their launch for Arianspace. They let it all the same ours.

                      Quote: Simargl
                      and even then - 9 against 10.


                      No, you forgot about the two launches of the delayed vanweb, and you also moved Proton to the quarter since March laughing . But it doesn’t matter, all the same this year they will launch from the delayed, Proton flies at the end of July, and the same launches from the MCC are postponed to October-November.

                      Quote: Simargl
                      On the other hand, then you can count 3 Atlas-5 drinks laughing


                      No, we do not launch Atlas-5 - it is launched by ULA, we sell them engines only, as well as Grumann. This is taken into account by NPO Energomash more.
              2. orionvitt 26 May 2020 13: 24 New
                • 4
                • 2
                +2
                Quote: mikhailovich22
                I didn’t hear that the Americans flew into space on their ship

                Do not pay attention and do not waste your nerves. All adherents of the Mask sect, on this resource, by virtue of their tenacity, generally do not see the difference between flight and launch. When you start to prove to them that they launch their satellites, but fly then they’re on our “Unions”, you always hear one answer, such as “so what.” In response, they always talk about some "incredible quantities" of some sort of launches, also supposedly cheaper than a taxi ride. What can you do, some truly holy believe that in the West "all the best." I already spat and try not to interfere in such disputes. Useless.
              3. AnderS 26 May 2020 16: 34 New
                • 3
                • 0
                +3
                while they fly on the Rogozin trampoline.

                Well, so far there is both a trampoline and something Rogozinsky far. So far, everyone is flying modernized Soviet rockets and spacecraft.
      5. NEXUS 25 May 2020 20: 08 New
        • 15
        • 5
        +10
        Quote: poquello
        Russia has its own plans, and many of them do not seem to provide for cooperation with the United States

        All these statements look very blurry and look more like some kind of bravado, in case of a bad game. At the same time, people in self-isolation insistently hammered lies in their heads, while closing their mouths to those who want to understand and ask uncomfortable questions.
        Here I am interested in answers to a number of questions ...
        For example, with regard to the space theme ... why, while we are in a state of war (in fact) with the United States and NATO, we sell them titanium, palladium, rocket engines and much more, strategically important for many key industries of the United States?
        Here, many will answer, well, we sell, they say, because it supports our space industry and other industries, new jobs, and so on ... it seems to look smooth, but ...
        And during the Soviet era during the Cold War, what did the Union, in order to support its production and new jobs, not sell all this to the United States? At the same time, everything developed, was under construction, and there was practically no unemployment as such.
        Why do we need cooperation with the Anglo-Saxon civilization, with which we have been at war for many centuries?
        And this same cooperation or influence on our lives of sworn friends is observed in everything: starting with pharmacology, food, and ending with the banking system. If someone does not know, then out of 40% of Sberbank's free shares, 70% of them are in the hands of the United States and Great Britain.
        Such as Gref, Kudrin, Nabiulina are afraid of individual sanctions from Washington. For example, it is very significant how Gref evades the answer to the question-why in the Crimea (the territory of the Russian Federation, if that) does not open a representative office of Sberbank. In YouTube there is a record of his press conference.
        And with this epidemic, not everything is so clear and transparent. Especially after the EVENT 201. Who does not know, here is an excerpt about this event ..
        Event 201 (eng. Event 201) - pandemic exercises conducted by Johns Hopkins University 18 2019 October, the with the participation of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the World Economic Forum.

        The date is very remarkable ... that is, a month before the outbreak ...
        Simulation game
        During the game, the process of spreading a pandemic of a new zoonotic coronavirus, first transmitted from bats to pigs and then to humans, was simulated. Brazilian farms were recognized as the focus of infection. In the human population, infection was carried out by airborne droplets, as well as with handshakes and other tactile contacts. Tourists carry the disease across the oceans. A feature of the virus was the lack of an effective vaccine and selective mortality, mainly associated with individuals whose immunity is weakened. A hypothetical virus should look like a flu virus or SARS. In 18 months, he must destroy 65 million people around the world. The pandemic begins to slow due to a decrease in the number of susceptible people. The pandemic will continue until an effective vaccine appears or until 80–90% of the world's population is infected. From this point on, it is likely to become an endemic childhood illness. At the same time, the global economy will collapse by 11%

        At the same time, Trump suspended the financing of WHO ... But the Russian Federation paid $ 1 million to WHO for research and development of a coronovirus vaccine. Interesting ... At the same time, the United States wants to receive trillions of dollars from China for the spread of this infection.
        Can anyone remember at all what disease WHO has defeated in many years? But the money is poured there from all over the world. And from Russia as well.
        I had some kind of strange feeling that all these space games, epidemics, and so on are just some kind of performance for us simple and gullible spectators.
        1. Misha Honest 26 May 2020 03: 18 New
          • 1
          • 5
          -4
          Quote: NEXUS
          NEXUS
          if you wanted to say that ours - suckers - you are right),
        2. poquello 26 May 2020 03: 30 New
          • 2
          • 1
          +1
          Quote: NEXUS
          why, being in a state of war (in fact) with the United States and NATO, are we selling them titanium, palladium, rocket engines, and much more, strategically important for many key industries in the United States?

          still hoping for peace, friendship, chewing gum, and ... there is one small but very important detail - the difference from that time - business in the PM and American is not the same with the US government and its offices

          Quote: NEXUS
          And with this epidemic, not everything is so clear and transparent. Especially after the EVENT 201. Who does not know, here is an excerpt about this event ..
          Event 201 (Eng. Event 201) is a pandemic exercise conducted by Johns Hopkins University on October 18, 2019 with the participation of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the World Economic Forum.

          The date is very remarkable ... that is, a month before the outbreak ...
          Simulation game
          During the game, the process of spreading a pandemic of a new zoonotic coronavirus, first transmitted from bats to pigs and then to humans, was simulated. Brazilian farms were recognized as the focus of infection. In the human population, infection was carried out by airborne droplets, as well as with handshakes and other tactile contacts. Tourists carry the disease across the oceans. A feature of the virus was the lack of an effective vaccine and selective mortality, mainly associated with individuals whose immunity is weakened. A hypothetical virus should look like a flu virus or SARS. In 18 months, he must destroy 65 million people around the world. The pandemic begins to slow due to a decrease in the number of susceptible people. The pandemic will continue until an effective vaccine appears or until 80–90% of the world's population is infected. From this point on, it is likely to become an endemic childhood illness. At the same time, the global economy will collapse by 11%

          Americans' refusal to explain about the importation of the virus from the United States and their biolaboratory suggests certain thoughts

          Quote: NEXUS

          Can anyone remember at all what disease WHO has defeated in many years?

          In 1952-1964 the organization conducted the Global Tropical Granuloma Eradication Program (a skin disease that cripples and disfigures the human body), which included penicillin injection. For 30 years since 1974, WHO has implemented the “Onchocerciasis Eradication Program” (“river blindness”) in West Africa, as a result of which blindness was prevented in 600 thousand patients and 18 million children were saved from this disease.

          В
          In 1974, the “Expanded Program on Immunization to Ensure Access to Essential Vaccines for Children” was adopted. At that time, few countries had immunization programs, most of them only responding to outbreaks. WHO advised national epidemiologists on how to conduct surveillance and introduced a vaccine prequalification system. By 1990, global vaccination coverage for the first and third doses of pertussis, diphtheria, and tetanus vaccines reached 88% and 76%, respectively, and by 2012, 91% and 83%.

          In the years 1967-1979. the organization coordinated a campaign to eradicate smallpox, the results of which - the complete eradication of the disease worldwide - she considers her most serious achievement.

          In 1988, WHO launched the Global Polio Eradication Initiative, which reduced its incidence by more than 99%.

          In the late 1990s, WHO devoted financial and organizational resources to the fight against HIV. A lot of money was spent on developing a vaccine and medicine, but they never appeared. However, it was possible to develop other effective methods of treatment, including the use of inhibitors that prevent infection from entering the stage of a fatal disease.
        3. Per se. 26 May 2020 07: 12 New
          • 8
          • 2
          +6
          Quote: NEXUS
          all these space games
          The Americans were playing space, so far behind the USSR that even after its collapse they could not independently build an orbital station, and before the shuttles appeared, they could only make suborbital jumps, falsifying, including the Hollywood landing on the moon. "The conquerors of the moon," paid off from exposure by the leadership of the USSR, made an offer that our short-sighted politicians could not refuse then. There is still a real moon landing problem. Gallant Americans famously "visited" the Moon without having worked out flight technologies in automatic mode (unlike the USSR), in rag spacesuits, in an oxygen environment, with diapers ...

          The main thing is that according to the NASA declared trajectory of the Earth’s radiation belts (about which there was not enough information then), their astronauts (not astronauts) would expect 100% death from radiation. In addition, the brave cowboys "flew" in their super-successful show launches, during the years of maximum Sun activity.

          By the way, the US Congress demanded that Russia stop disseminating information refuting the Americans’ landing on the moon. Congressmen Ted Cruz, Lamar Smith, and Brian Babin made such an official appeal. Although, a monstrous lie, according to the lunar scam, is becoming apparent not only in Russia, but throughout the world.

          In what Mr. Rogozin is right, we do not need such programs of "conquering" the Moon. Why is still not officially declassified all the facts of American falsification, is another question. Sooner or later, this will happen anyway, if the Soviet archives are not declassified, there will be other evidence of America’s impossibility of landing on the moon in the last century, and the shame of the United States will already be colossal, commensurate with a lost war.
          1. Glory1974 26 May 2020 10: 47 New
            • 2
            • 3
            -1
            there will be other evidence of America’s impossibility of landing on the moon in the last century, and, the shame of the United States will already be colossal,

            Evidence is already there. Information technologies blur them, divert attention to the side. And so it can go on for a long time. And over time, interest in the topic will fade and everyone will let go on the brakes.
          2. Selevc 26 May 2020 15: 03 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            The main thing is that according to the NASA declared trajectory of the Earth’s radiation belts (about which there was not enough information then), their astronauts (not astronauts) would expect 100% death from radiation.
            Ask yourself a simple question - Why, after the successful implementation of the Apollo program, NO ONE space power did not take a manned flight around the moon ??? I'm not talking about landing on the moon and taking off from it - this is a separate conversation ...
            Neither astronauts nor astronauts have been flying into the orbit of the moon for almost half a century !!! Why ????

            The answer is simple and banal: the Moon is outside the Earth’s magnetosphere and the crew flying into its orbit will certainly die after receiving super-powerful doses of solar radiation !!! The USSR knew this, therefore, did not send a man to the moon, the United States hid it by imitating the flight of its astronauts to the moon !!!

            Trump’s current conversations about the moon are just the talk of politics and have nothing to do with space exploration ...
            1. kig
              kig 27 May 2020 02: 56 New
              • 0
              • 1
              -1
              Quote: Selevc
              radiation !!!

              Quote: Selevc
              to the moon !!!

              Quote: Selevc
              half a century !!!

              And why do people like you love exclamation marks so much? They probably think that the more exclamations, the more convincing they seem?
        4. Tusv 26 May 2020 10: 21 New
          • 2
          • 1
          +1
          Quote: NEXUS
          For example, with regard to the cosmic theme ... why, being seemingly at war (in fact) with the United States and NATO, we sell them titanium, palladium, rocket engines

          They say Andrey hi that we do not sell titanium, but supply high-tech titanium alloys. Without which, flight safety will decrease slightly. Another question with whose tacit consent was divided the market between Boeing and Airbass. Type Cargo may be, but do not pop into the passenger. And now we have what we have. The hard workers want to eat, and deliver either to the bourgeois, or to the Army. Here we have such an interesting war
        5. keeper03 26 May 2020 10: 34 New
          • 3
          • 1
          +2
          Ask the right questions, comrade NEXUS! hi yes good
        6. The comment was deleted.
    2. unaha 25 May 2020 14: 28 New
      • 12
      • 10
      +2
      In this case, the United States is not going to spend money at all, it creates the conditions for private companies to spend money.
      1. SOVIET UNION 2 25 May 2020 15: 17 New
        • 8
        • 6
        +2
        And who will give money to private companies? Who will give those tasks? Do it, I don’t know what? Or will they do it like with Chubais? They give money, money is mastered, what is available at the exit is not asked. What about the genius of private management with breakthrough technologies? Theoretically, we should already populate the sun. And practically? Or does he have such secret technologies before that he shouldn’t know about them? Mask has at least some kind of body movement.
        1. unaha 25 May 2020 15: 43 New
          • 6
          • 3
          +3
          "And who will give money to private companies? Who will give those tasks? Do something, I don’t know what?" - no one will give money or put TK. These are private initiatives. Who gave money or put TK Bezos for the development of BE-4? Where they find the opportunity to make a profit, they will invest there. It can be state. orders, but not for the rocket, but for the service of launching into orbit or delivery to the ISS.
          1. SOVIET UNION 2 25 May 2020 16: 06 New
            • 4
            • 7
            -3
            These are private initiatives.
            Well, okay. No one will invest! This is not Russian, something to create. After all, we have a private-state partnership. The state pays the private owner participation in money sharing (budget development). Even to raise money they created Plato. What private initiative can we talk about? Something is not visible to private aircraft factories or private shipbuilding. Judging by the stagnation of production in the country, we can only get profit from two pipes (and even then they are now in question).
            1. unaha 25 May 2020 19: 44 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              So I'm talking about the US and Trump's latest initiatives. This has nothing to do with the Russian Federation. We have a special way)
        2. Voltsky 25 May 2020 16: 05 New
          • 2
          • 2
          0
          Red has already come out in profit, no need to drive him - you can only use rods to educate
          1. SOVIET UNION 2 25 May 2020 16: 09 New
            • 3
            • 3
            0
            This is about the video where he says, We have money! We have a lot of money!
            1. Voltsky 25 May 2020 16: 12 New
              • 3
              • 2
              +1
              No about financial reporting
          2. Doliva63 25 May 2020 16: 26 New
            • 6
            • 1
            +5
            Quote: Voletsky
            Red has already come out in profit, no need to drive him - you can only use rods to educate

            And when he was not in profit? belay
        3. Tusv 26 May 2020 10: 40 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: SOVIET UNION 2
          Theoretically, we should already populate the sun. And practically?

          And almost the Americans brought the production of the left wheel to Asia, and the drawing was safely lost. Now turnips are scratched, which detail is better. 3D Printed or Chinese bully
      2. ultra 25 May 2020 18: 24 New
        • 2
        • 1
        +1
        Well you are naive. laughing
      3. The comment was deleted.
    3. Not_invented 25 May 2020 14: 33 New
      • 25
      • 17
      +8
      Sounds good, but not realistic.
      What will we offer them? Korolevsky Union? Or, maybe, operating time at Mir station? Collaboration is about equals. And Roskosmos surpasses NASA only in the number of unfulfilled promises.
      1. Jack O'Neill 25 May 2020 14: 41 New
        • 7
        • 23
        -16
        We can offer them brains. It is a demanding product.
        1. Not_invented 25 May 2020 14: 44 New
          • 24
          • 12
          +12
          Well, if you are talking about the re-purchase by Americans of specialists from Russia - yes, we can. And successfully offer. Our experts thrown there. To Ilon, for example, the Mask. Because when you work there you see how rockets take off and land, how humanity is getting closer to the stars. And in Roscosmos you see how a tower of money from corrupt officials becomes closer to the stars.
          1. Jack O'Neill 25 May 2020 14: 48 New
            • 11
            • 10
            +1
            Not everyone dumps. Someone may refuse for one reason or another.
            Although, it seems to me, it is better to work where your work is valued, and not for abstract things.
            1. Not_invented 25 May 2020 14: 51 New
              • 13
              • 5
              +8
              Not all, I do not argue. The family keeps some, some age, some hope to change everything. But until the thieves go to trial, and competent managers come in their place, we will be sad to look from the ground at the Americans and Chinese flying away to the moon.
              1. Jack O'Neill 25 May 2020 14: 59 New
                • 9
                • 10
                -1
                So it will be, if everything goes well with us, by gravity ...
                It’s not even Rogozin's fault (Rogozin is just a pawn), but ..
                The fish rots from the head!
                1. K-612-O 25 May 2020 15: 20 New
                  • 13
                  • 10
                  +3
                  I'm afraid to ask, what do you know about our lunar program? What devices are being built and developed, launch dates, media type? What is the concept at all?
                  And by the way, you can cram into someone, of course, but looking at China, which so far has only been able to copy Soviet space, this is not a progressive matter.
                  And about the decay and all the rest of the above, it’s for you in MK or Echo.
                  1. Not_invented 25 May 2020 15: 50 New
                    • 20
                    • 6
                    +14
                    Every day I see rotting at work. I was developing a remote control system for a locomotive, and I really wanted to put domestic components there. I searched, I searched. Well, not them. Our resistors are much more expensive than Chinese, similar processors are almost entirely made of gold for such money that you can buy the whole locomotive. As a result, I bought a domestic antenna. But not because it is better than the Chinese one, but because the dimensions are such that the Post has piled up so much money that the price has doubled. Of the three hundred nomenclatures in the product, there is only one domestic part. Because they either do not, or are more expensive and worse than the Chinese.
                    1. keeper03 26 May 2020 10: 41 New
                      • 1
                      • 1
                      0
                      Well, here are the ideal conditions for the development of something domestic! request And who created them!?! But on the box every day they shout about support, development, but in reality - they rob the country! am
                  2. Not_invented 25 May 2020 15: 53 New
                    • 10
                    • 9
                    +1
                    As for the program and the concept, the trouble is that they are not there. Every month Rogozin invents new nonsense. Either a space elevator, then a robot with legs in zero gravity will send, then it will come up with trampolines, then Martian rockets. But in reality, the last interplanetary station we flew in 20011, and even that sank.
                  3. sniperino 25 May 2020 19: 18 New
                    • 5
                    • 5
                    0
                    Quote: K-612-O
                    is it you in MK or Echo
                    I can assume that it sounds on these resources, it is repeated many times on VO: there it is interwoven with pseudo-liberal rhetoric, and here mainly in pseudo-communist.
            2. mikhailovich22 25 May 2020 21: 55 New
              • 2
              • 1
              +1
              Quote: Jack O'Neill
              not for abstract things.

              Today the most abstract thing is the American dollar.
              http://webdiscover.ru/v/22301
              The captain hacked all the pumps at full capacity, but the rats still ran from the ship.
              Allegory is an allegorical depiction of an abstract concept or phenomenon through a concrete image; personification of human properties or qualities.
        2. really 25 May 2020 14: 54 New
          • 6
          • 3
          +3
          So basically it happens, the brains go to work where they pay more, all other things being equal and normal.
          1. SOVIET UNION 2 25 May 2020 15: 24 New
            • 10
            • 2
            +8
            The statement seems to be true. But how then in the Union were able to create rockets and fly into space if you did not pay in bucks and there were no talented top managers? That is an insoluble mystery! Where did the talented fanatic engineers who did not graduate from foreign institutions come from in the Union !?
            1. really 25 May 2020 18: 04 New
              • 1
              • 4
              -3
              If the borders are locked, then where will they leave, and if you shove them around in sharashka, then you won’t go anywhere. But as soon as
            2. Venya Selnikov 26 May 2020 12: 45 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              The USSR was a closed, closed system. And the time was different ...
              You need to think about the present and future.
              Now the world is open to specialists (and this is wonderful), and the most intelligent ones from the university bench can choose not only the region, but also the country of application of their forces.
              What's bad about it?
              If you want to work only with those who want to work only for Russia, regardless of other conditions, it is possible, but there are not many of them.
              Russia wants to keep its specialists at home - it needs to offer better conditions. And the best conditions are, of course, not only money.
              1. SOVIET UNION 2 27 May 2020 19: 57 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                And the best conditions are, of course, not only money.
                Then I agree. Moral incentive is also a powerful factor! My wallet is thicker, the car is cooler, my wife has more boobs! In the system of capitalism, egoism is cultivated. I am the most. most! It seems good. But often you have to play for a team or team. But how to play for a team if the quotient is higher than the total? Although I agree that playing in a team with a single leadership can achieve more. In the Union, private was crossed with the common, and rightly so. My street, my city, my team, my factory, my sports team! Socialism must be returned! Capitalism is all crap and crap! We ourselves cannot! We have all the bad stuff! The neighbor is better! With such a psychology, we will soon move to the caves!
                1. Venya Selnikov 30 May 2020 23: 37 New
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  +1
                  Why so exaggerate the form of capitalism that now exists in the West, in the same USA? This is far from that wild form of Victorian capitalism, to which we, in Russia, IMHO, are much closer than they are. Alas.
                  The USA is able (as a system) to work not only with the private, but also with the public.
                  And very successful and productive.
                  Only in space do they spend billions every year on scientific programs whose results are available to the whole world. And who in the world does more (in the field of science in space) of them? I’m in such countries, you know, I don’t know. A person who is interested in science in space is a pleasure to “walk” on NASA sites. A sea of ​​information, everything is structured, of high quality. And we have open scientific results from Roskosmos in comparison with them - a roll ball.
        3. Lycan 25 May 2020 15: 42 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Not only we can, but also offer. And these brains, quite likely, work (indirectly, of course) against us, increasing the scientific potential of competitors. Ask better - why can't we offer them “final products”? (engines, as an exception, and resources will not be considered)
          I will answer right away: because we give away the brilliant brains of ̶п̶р̶о̶д̶а̶ё̶м̶ (by disruption to a decent salary) just to them. And why should they buy the final product if the brains they bought come up with the same product there with the full support of local contractors? ...
          1. Jack O'Neill 25 May 2020 15: 46 New
            • 6
            • 4
            +2
            Well then it's the finish, if we can only sell brains.
            Do you understand this?
            1. Lycan 25 May 2020 16: 06 New
              • 3
              • 0
              +3
              Understand. But I’m exaggerating. Of course, many brains are arranged at home (for various reasons), but the salary and bosses (managerial) conditions in which you have to live and work need to be improved, otherwise the prestige of scientific, engineering, teaching, medical, and other underestimated activities will decrease, reducing and the culture of such important areas. But to develop them - not so fast, but necessary. And beyond the hill - no, no, but there are vacancies.
              1. Jack O'Neill 25 May 2020 16: 42 New
                • 6
                • 2
                +4
                Beyond the hillock, the brains are also treated more responsibly, trying to increase them.
          2. Fan-fan 25 May 2020 15: 59 New
            • 10
            • 3
            +7
            What does it mean to sell brains? Are we selling people? Yes, people with brains themselves run there, run away from hopelessness and hopelessness here, because they want to get a decent salary for their work, not a penny.
            1. Lycan 25 May 2020 16: 09 New
              • 4
              • 1
              +3
              Quote: Fan-Fan
              Yes, people with brains themselves run there, run from hopelessness and hopelessness here

              Yes, I made a reservation, we do not sell, but we give.
              1. Venya Selnikov 26 May 2020 12: 54 New
                • 0
                • 1
                -1
                Quote: Lycan
                Quote: Fan-Fan
                Yes, people with brains themselves run there, run from hopelessness and hopelessness here

                Yes, I made a reservation, we do not sell, but we give.
                It’s not necessary to think “give away” in such categories.
                People are not goods, and not objects, they themselves go where they believe that they will be better. And it is right and good.
                In the modern world, you just need to create long-term conditions so that your situation is better than “there”. And people themselves will remain, and even from other countries will begin to come, so just have time to choose the best.
                1. Lycan 26 May 2020 13: 59 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Quote: Venya Selnikov
                  they themselves go where they think they will be better

                  Here you have 2 communicating vessels with liquid connected by a tube. You, for example, need to organize the transfusion of liquid (or parts of it) into the required vessel (possessing the necessary volume). What are we doing? We provide increased pressure in the resource vessel and air bleeding in the receiving vessel.
                  So it is with people (and with governments) in the 3rd world countries: in their regions we provide social services. instability with pom. internal agents, puppet-laden leaders, radical fundamentalists, arts. int., inter., interreligious. squabble ... But in contrast - the land of the SGA, west / north / center. Europe is a zone of stable life, where special agencies distribute a fresh delivery of “those who think it’s better here,” questioning the level of education and seniority by profession and, possibly, offering options to prominent specialists. Some, of course, themselves can settle down, but not a lot of them.
                  Quote: Venya Selnikov
                  In the modern world, you just need to create long-term conditions so that your situation is better than “there”.

                  Of course you need. But oh oh how notjust. To do this, you need to raise the welfare of citizens to an acceptable level, providing a decent salary relative to the price level of goods and services (purchasing power). This is not every country will pull. Here I look at the pensions of ordinary workers, plowing for the benefit of the motherland, but at the initial retirement age ... the question immediately arises - as adequately (and not beggarly) to survive in retirement? Well, the conclusions are appropriate.
        4. Leonid Batsura 26 May 2020 19: 58 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          What kind of brains? They (USA) don't need any brains. The United States spent $ 30 billion and nearly 10 years of time on the Constellation return program to the moon. Scientists (brains) were involved in the work. The Brains concluded that during the implementation of the Apollo program, not a single problem of a manned flight to the Moon was solved and that for the foreseeable period (then it was 2040 - now 2060) the USA will not be able to create technical means that will allow send people to the moon and safely return them to Earth. What brains? - from them in the corruption schemes only losses. Homotsifra people went. This is supposedly a homosapiens post. In reality, this is a return to Neanderthals. Corn to Arkhangelsk was much more productive. Try to feel if the dreamers of the digital economy are not similar to the Ambertals ??? The homocycle actually went from Ellochka the Ogre. With whom she crossed - is unknown ...
      2. 210ox 25 May 2020 14: 45 New
        • 15
        • 1
        +14
        I do not understand. What does the Reagan SOI and the exploration of the Kennedy Moon have to do with it?
        1. SOVIET UNION 2 25 May 2020 15: 37 New
          • 4
          • 6
          -2
          Rogozin probably believes that our academics believed in the SDI program. Although in reality they proposed a very real and inexpensive way to deal with orbiting satellites. A bucket of fractions is put into orbit and all the satellites become like a sieve! That's the whole race in the SOI program! Against expensive satellites a penny! In terms of the exploration of the moon. If Americans already have experience flying back and forth, let them fly on! Could fly in the era of lamp appliances !? What are the problems then today? And if we talk about cooperation with the states, it’s better not to! They themselves have already flown to the moon, but for some reason the orbital station is cohabiting! Therefore, we better arrange races in space with the Americans! Based on past experience, it will be better for everyone. And there they can economically tear them in space.
          1. A.TOR 25 May 2020 16: 17 New
            • 4
            • 1
            +3
            [quote economically tear them in space] [/ quote]
            Is it a joke or are you really going to bust Mask and Bezos. And the State is "theirs" here sideways
            1. SOVIET UNION 2 27 May 2020 19: 40 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Are you really going to bust Mask and Bezos?
              We must set high goals! Or is Russia weak? When they set high goals, then the rivers could turn back, split the atom, and launch the satellite! Well, when they came down to the desires of sausages and toilet paper, then regression came! yes So what?! Will we fight or surrender (if we have not already surrendered)? Judging by the fact that we drink Bavarian and drive a BMW-surrendered! hi And it is a fact! The Germans do not go to the Muscovites and do not drink Zhigulevskoe! On the internet, of course, there are videos where in Germany they demonstrate the packaging of Zhigulevsky! I'm talking about the desires of the Germans.
              1. A.TOR 27 May 2020 23: 33 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                Or is Russia weak?

                Russia is weak.
          2. Narak-zempo 26 May 2020 08: 50 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: SOVIET UNION 2
            A bucket of fractions is put into orbit and all the satellites become like a sieve!

            That's it, that's ALL. And that would be the end of space exploration in general.
            1. SOVIET UNION 2 27 May 2020 19: 43 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              And that would be the end of space exploration in general.
              Yeah! And chemical, bacteriological, nuclear weapons is the beginning of life on Earth !?
          3. Leonid Batsura 26 May 2020 20: 14 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            You can agree with a friend 100%. However, who drove the US to the moon? Hold on tight - just not NASA. She has nothing to do with it. She is clean. The fact that the Apollonavites stomp on the moon above our heads until 1972 was a star of TsNIImash. He even released the Apollo program in two parts (as of July 1968 and July 1971). Pay attention to the sources of information - no information from NASA. And then what? And the American Aerospace Boulevard. These sources have sunk into oblivion, and the Apollo Program in two parts has not been posted on the Internet. And since 1973, the USSR Academy of Sciences, the USSR Civil Code began to carry Americans to the Moon (after the last "flight" to the Moon). and technology, VNIIti. This is the so-called work of II Shuneiko. It was Brezhnev who brought him to the United States in 1973 (June 16-24) to Nixon. "Dear Richard, do not hesitate, your USA flew to the Moon, flew. That’s the approving signature of the theorist of Soviet cosmonautics in the rank of the President of the USSR Academy of Sciences "
        2. Thrall 25 May 2020 15: 39 New
          • 2
          • 2
          0
          Quote: 210ox
          I do not understand. What does the Reagan SOI and the exploration of the Kennedy Moon have to do with it?

          And I still did not understand when the USSR was copying the American SOI
          1. Vadim237 25 May 2020 15: 49 New
            • 3
            • 4
            -1
            When he created the Skif laser battle station - but they did not put it into the calculated orbit.
      3. Sklendarka 25 May 2020 14: 56 New
        • 4
        • 1
        +3
        But how- ,, ... space maps are tucked into tablets ... "?,
        or still read, Dunno on the Moon. "
        It's a shame, panimash ...
    4. Svarog 25 May 2020 14: 41 New
      • 14
      • 12
      +2
      We should not jerk in the way that, unfortunately, the Soviet Union once reacted to the strategic defense initiative, when tremendous money was actually thrown at a fantastic idea, which, as a result, was not realized.

      Rogozin has already folded his legs to the top and is not going to twitch at all. Enormous money was thrown into the development of science, the space program pulled hundreds of related enterprises and science as a whole. And if you don’t twitch, then we’ll sit on oil until it ends and degrade to African countries .. Millet and oil and gas are all of them.
      1. poquello 25 May 2020 15: 10 New
        • 4
        • 6
        -2
        Quote: Svarog
        Enormous money was thrown into the development of science, the space program pulled hundreds of related enterprises and science as a whole.

        What attracted the space program? I somehow assumed that the military program was pulling the space
        1. Doliva63 25 May 2020 16: 38 New
          • 3
          • 3
          0
          Quote: poquello
          Quote: Svarog
          Enormous money was thrown into the development of science, the space program pulled hundreds of related enterprises and science as a whole.

          What attracted the space program? I somehow assumed that the military program was pulling the space

          It would be more correct to say that these were parallel programs laughing
          1. poquello 25 May 2020 17: 58 New
            • 2
            • 1
            +1
            Quote: Doliva63
            Quote: poquello
            Quote: Svarog
            Enormous money was thrown into the development of science, the space program pulled hundreds of related enterprises and science as a whole.

            What attracted the space program? I somehow assumed that the military program was pulling the space

            It would be more correct to say that these were parallel programs laughing

            no, it’s not correct, p7 was created for delivery of 10 thousand thermonuclear charge, on its versions went the satellite, Laika and Gagarin
        2. sniperino 25 May 2020 19: 40 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          Quote: poquello
          I somehow assumed that the military program was pulling the space
          Of course, the arms race contributed to the development of the scientific and economic potential of the USSR. If the competition between the two systems at this point did not force the best brains of skilled workers to win the race, as before in preparation for the Great Patriotic War, with the wise Gosplan without internal competition, we would not have gone far in one social competition.
    5. Sergey39 25 May 2020 14: 48 New
      • 7
      • 9
      -2
      Quote: Jack O'Neill
      Well, Rogozin is right.

      Rogozin is right, but mastering with the Americans will be cheaper for the Americans. And now they, with their statements about the Moon, are mastering the budget of the election campaign. We do not need such allies!
    6. Gogia 25 May 2020 14: 56 New
      • 20
      • 2
      +18
      Americans do not plan to build a NASA office worth billions of dollars in central Washington ... They can count money, even though they have much more.
    7. AUL
      AUL 25 May 2020 15: 08 New
      • 3
      • 3
      0
      Quote: Jack O'Neill
      But to master along with the Americans, it is much cheaper, and in both directions. So we need to cooperate!

      As the experience of the ISS has shown, equitable cooperation with the Americans does not work. And to be in their grasp for their own money is not inspiring. Better with the Indians or the Chinese, but on strictly agreed terms!
      1. Svarog 25 May 2020 15: 24 New
        • 14
        • 5
        +9
        Quote: AUL
        Better with the Indians or the Chinese, but on strictly agreed terms!

        Things are not going smoothly with Indians and Chinese either .. especially with Indians laughing We ourselves need to simply shorten the yachts .. The USSR managed to do it all on its own, and also feed the floor of the world ..
        1. slipped 25 May 2020 21: 07 New
          • 3
          • 3
          0
          Quote: Svarog
          Things are not going smoothly with Indians and Chinese either .. especially with Indians laughing


          Everything is normal in our space with the Indians - now in the CPC, under the auspices of the Glavkosmos, four Indians are being trained.



          And with the Chinese, everything is in order with us - the group on the moon is working.
        2. Vadim237 26 May 2020 01: 37 New
          • 0
          • 3
          -3
          He fed half the world at the expense of his own, and he bought tens of millions of tons from the USA and Canada - and do not rub garbage about the fact that this grain was fodder because cattle and other cattle do not eat one grain.
          1. poquello 26 May 2020 03: 38 New
            • 0
            • 2
            -2
            Quote: Vadim237
            He fed half the world at the expense of his own, and he bought tens of millions of tons from the USA and Canada - and do not rub garbage about the fact that this grain was fodder because cattle and other cattle do not eat one grain.

            in this example, you rub it yourself, the bourgeoisie planted it on the Canadian grain of the USSR, the “battle for the crop” turned out to be cheaper
            1. Vadim237 26 May 2020 13: 54 New
              • 0
              • 1
              -1
              Of course, the bourgeoisie of the USSR planted grain purchases abroad - but by no means did anyone in their plan of Nichrome manage the needs of the whole country like the CX. Go to your grandmothers on the bench and tell them they absorb such nonsense.
      2. slipped 25 May 2020 21: 03 New
        • 2
        • 2
        0
        Quote: AUL
        As the experience of the ISS has shown, equitable cooperation with the Americans does not work.


        On the ISS between Russia and the USA equitable cooperation.
    8. Snail N9 25 May 2020 15: 27 New
      • 26
      • 9
      +17
      Judging by how quickly all educational institutions are “optimized” in terms of reduction, and the number of churches and other religious institutions is growing, I believe in such an end to the Russian space program:
      1. AML
        AML 25 May 2020 16: 33 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        And why not. The ocean is 80% unstudied.
      2. slipped 25 May 2020 21: 12 New
        • 3
        • 4
        -1
        Quote: Snail N9
        I believe in such an end to the Russian space program


        Well, yes, the main thing is to believe, and not to see the facts. laughing And sketch photojacks.
      3. Motorist 25 May 2020 21: 23 New
        • 4
        • 2
        +2
        Snail, your pictures are repeated. Is that all there is on the Internet on this subject ?! "All garbage, Misha - let's do it again ... Nobody will give money ..." (c)
    9. Ded_Mazay 25 May 2020 15: 33 New
      • 9
      • 4
      +5
      Quote: Jack O'Neill
      we need to cooperate!

      First of all - what for do we need this? And secondly - with whom? With the authors of “wonderful” ideas and semantic constructions like “it's all the Russians to blame”, “Russian hackers”, “we won’t finance the cart”, “we quit the open sky agreement” and so on?
      Yes, a deep thought, a person with a wealth of life experience ...
      1. Jack O'Neill 25 May 2020 15: 39 New
        • 4
        • 8
        -4
        Well, kindergarten, well.
        And what about the fact that "it's all the Russians to blame"? And if I tell you that it's all your fault?
        I also drive many people at work, but this does not stop me from working with them.
        Funny, isn't it? Interesting...
        As the saying goes: "they invented themselves, they believed."
        1. Ded_Mazay 25 May 2020 15: 59 New
          • 6
          • 5
          +1
          So i say
          Yes, a deep thought, a person with a wealth of life experience ..

          At your work, you can at least perform an ear stand; nobody cares. And here it is. that the United States has largely lost its ability to negotiate is a fait accompli. Take, for example, at least the “open skies” treaty, which, at their whim, they safely buried literally the other day.
          1. Snail N9 25 May 2020 16: 17 New
            • 6
            • 5
            +1
            The United States has largely lost its contractibility - this is a fait accompli.

            They "agree" with the powerful and influential, and different types of "addicts" are simply confronted with the fact or (and) punished for disobedience ....
            1. Ded_Mazay 25 May 2020 17: 54 New
              • 7
              • 1
              +6
              Well, China has been confronted with the "fact" that it owes for a coronocrisis.
              It will be interesting to see how the headquarters will punish him. lol.
    10. Kuroneko 25 May 2020 16: 21 New
      • 4
      • 1
      +3
      Quote: Jack O'Neill
      Well, Rogozin is right. Americans can afford a lot more, in view of the fact that more money is corny.

      Not everything is decided by money alone. On such a tip of human (the whole Earth) technology, people are needed first of all, not money. If there is no brainy genius, no matter how much money you throw, there will be no special effect.
      Korolev confirms.
    11. st25310 25 May 2020 16: 21 New
      • 3
      • 2
      +1
      It is necessary to place social advertisements on the salary cards of our deputies and officials, such as "do not steal," and the hungry eyes of kids, etc.
    12. smart ass 25 May 2020 16: 52 New
      • 6
      • 2
      +4
      It is written that a lot has been done in 2 years ... that's what exactly was done in Roskosmos to keep up to date?
      1. ultra 25 May 2020 18: 34 New
        • 6
        • 3
        +3
        Renamed the Federation to Orel. wassat
        1. Genry 25 May 2020 21: 41 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          Quote: ultra
          Renamed the Federation to Orel.

          Firstly, they realized that he was not needed. There is no need to launch more than 3 people into space. But the avatar of Fyodor is really lacking there - just make him have monkey legs .....
    13. astepanov 25 May 2020 16: 54 New
      • 7
      • 2
      +5
      The main thing is to put "effective blowers" wherever possible. Those trained to suck money. In myself and with riveting. And then we all, no doubt, will overcome.
      What the hell is the moon? The unfortunate "Federation" (sorry, "Eagle") has been under construction for three decades - and complete constipation. Not a single launch into deep space for more than thirty years. There is hardly enough strength to maintain the GLONASS system. Even Cosmonautics Day was bashfully hushed up, because achievements are not just equal to zero - they are negative. Of course, there is no money. There is no money for anything: neither for machine tools, nor for education, nor for free high-quality medicine, nor for retirement, what kind of space is there ... Only for churches. Until there are two churches for each Russian, they will be built, and then, probably, they will begin to rebuild. For there is no power, not even from God. Now everything will be blamed on the epidemic: they say, if it weren’t, they would have overtaken everyone, they would have spread butter on lard, and black caviar on top. Figs there, what kind of oil is there, if the blowers have not yet been pumped.
      1. smart ass 25 May 2020 19: 48 New
        • 3
        • 3
        0
        Bet better effective lawyers, what are you getting to the bottom of managers? Oh yes, we have a lawyer at the head of state !!!! This is about the same as forcing a surgeon to repair an elevator)
        1. keeper03 26 May 2020 10: 48 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Yes, Soviet engineer destroyed, but stamped Russian lawyers, managers, economists! Now we are reaping the benefits ... recourse crying
    14. The comment was deleted.
    15. Bar1 25 May 2020 17: 38 New
      • 6
      • 7
      -1
      Dmitry Rogozin said in this regard that Russia does not intend to copy the American program for the exploration of the moon. He believes that the Soviet Union had already made a similar mistake when it decided to repeat the US Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) program, unofficially called the Star Wars program:


      what nonsense?
      Moon exploration is one program, and Star Wars is another program. Let's not do one because it is bad in another?
      Pin_dos on the moon weren’t clear to everyone except Rogozin, but the Soviet military Skif laser can be completely renewed now.
    16. Interlocutor 25 May 2020 19: 42 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      So we already cooperate at the international station. Already kiss the gums.
    17. Civil 26 May 2020 07: 13 New
      • 0
      • 2
      -2
      Rogozin digs the curves like a gnome, normal heroes always go around.
  2. GMM
    GMM 25 May 2020 14: 24 New
    • 20
    • 10
    +10
    We will not repeat the moon exploration program for the Americans

    We will fly in the sun! And so that our cosmonauts do not burn out, we will fly at night!
  3. Piramidon 25 May 2020 14: 24 New
    • 10
    • 21
    -11
    Rogozin: We will not repeat the moon exploration program for the Americans

    That is, we will not order shooting in Hollywood, will we use Mosfilm? lol Who else would explain to me, popularly (I’m so stupid that I don’t understand), why the hell do we need this moon? On Earth and in the country, is everything all right and arranged, or is there nowhere to put money?
    1. Jack O'Neill 25 May 2020 14: 29 New
      • 7
      • 11
      -4
      If our descendants did not come out of the water, then we would not be there, or we would swim and eat algae.
      1. Piramidon 25 May 2020 14: 53 New
        • 8
        • 5
        +3
        Quote: Jack O'Neill
        If our descendants did not come out of the water, then we would not be there, or we would swim and eat algae.

        Ek, where did you push it, and this is called verbiage. And to a specific question - "what the moon has surrendered to us now?", Did not give an answer. hi
        1. Jack O'Neill 25 May 2020 15: 12 New
          • 3
          • 6
          -3
          Everything is simple - development!
          See how the first Earth satellite boosted us! And imagine a modern world without a satellite.
          This is material science,
          and technology, etc.
      2. astepanov 25 May 2020 17: 29 New
        • 2
        • 2
        0
        Quote: Jack O'Neill
        If our descendants did not come out of the water, then we would not be there, or we would swim and eat algae.
        Are you confusing anything? This is when and whose descendants came out of the water? My descendants, of course, came out of the amniotic fluid, but why did you decide that I exist only thanks to this event?
        1. Jack O'Neill 25 May 2020 17: 44 New
          • 1
          • 2
          -1
          Where did the mammals come from? Or do you think that mammals at the click of a finger appeared?
          1. astepanov 25 May 2020 18: 49 New
            • 2
            • 1
            +1
            Uncle, you do not know much about biology. Mammals did not emerge from the water, but not all entered it, however, not all: seal whales, for example. The remaining mammals on land appeared and live on land. And amphibians came out of the water. If you believe that amphibians are our descendants, then you are mistaken. Yours - maybe, but for me they are distant ancestors, not descendants.
            1. Jack O'Neill 25 May 2020 20: 45 New
              • 1
              • 2
              -1
              So where did the mammals come from? Not from the first amphibians (stegocephals)?
              Just imagine, two fish swim, Petya and Vasya. Vasya is like this: To sing, let's go out and see what kind of land there is?
              Petya answers: well, shaw, well, shaw, will we do it there? Why do we need this? Let's better swim to Natasha.
              The end!

              Yes, in this situation, a person would not have appeared, not in the form in which we are now.
              1. astepanov 25 May 2020 23: 45 New
                • 3
                • 1
                +2
                Quote: Jack O'Neill
                where did the mammals come from? Not from the first amphibians (stegocephals)?

                Venerable, from the amphibians went reptiles. You better explain with what hangover you decided that we are the ancestors of frogs?
                Quote: Jack O'Neill
                If our descendants would not come out of the water
                Did you write this? That's what EG brings to!
          2. Interlocutor 25 May 2020 19: 44 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            laughing laughing laughing Well, ours from Aldebaran flew in, yours came out of the water ...... laughing laughing laughing
    2. donavi49 25 May 2020 14: 30 New
      • 12
      • 7
      +5
      Well, the Portuguese king Juan also thought about the same. What a trip overseas. You look where to squander state money. Still yards and castles are not rebuilt. NECESSARY!

      But then he regretted it very much. True, he was able to make a fuss, catch up and grab half of the open (although all the gold, silver, resources and trade routes went to the Spaniards).
      1. poquello 25 May 2020 14: 40 New
        • 6
        • 3
        +3
        Quote: donavi49
        Well, the Portuguese king Juan also thought about the same. What a trip overseas. You look where to squander state money. Still yards and castles are not rebuilt. NECESSARY!
        But then he regretted it very much.

        and history doesn’t know empty campaigns?
        1. novel66 25 May 2020 14: 41 New
          • 0
          • 3
          -3
          Mongols ... and Tatars ...
    3. Lycan 25 May 2020 14: 48 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      The moon, in fact, is such a good training ground for the development of life support technologies. So to speak - a step in progress. Well - "everything is nailed up", and places for placement and stocks - a lot. Well, solar panels can be installed. Even some kind of production (from boredom) to establish.
    4. SOVIET UNION 2 25 May 2020 15: 47 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      At the national level, space costs seem to be small. You can certainly not explore space. And how then to develop new technologies? Or do we need to descend into the Stone Age? Won small Israel can launch a shell to the moon! But does Russia mean that it should be incapable? Russia has great distances. Theoretically, we should be in the lead of all branches of transport. Do we already need any transport? All to Moscow for permanent residence? With thoughts-Why do we need the Moon? -We will soon begin to plow so wooden plow!
      1. mark2 25 May 2020 16: 26 New
        • 4
        • 3
        +1
        And these screamers will be. One already advanced space power has become a great agricultural one. Fat is buying abroad.
      2. Fishery 25 May 2020 20: 06 New
        • 2
        • 2
        0
        environmentally friendly, and with the approval of the patriarch and the boyars))))))
  4. Hog
    Hog 25 May 2020 14: 25 New
    • 8
    • 8
    0
    Much has been done during this time, and more needs to be done.

    Rephrase it on the topic of the day.
    During this time, much has been stolen, and even more to steal.
    1. Sklendarka 25 May 2020 14: 58 New
      • 2
      • 2
      0
      Yes, you quickly decrypted it ...
  5. Voltsky 25 May 2020 14: 26 New
    • 15
    • 14
    +1
    Rogozin

    uti-paths who got out of the spotlights :) The greatest top-manager of modernity, who promised a megawatt-class nuclear power plant, ship Orlan, Angara. In general, he promises great
    1. Alien From 25 May 2020 14: 32 New
      • 9
      • 10
      -1
      And not only promises, but also works hard ....... on the welfare of the people ...... only their own ......
      1. Voltsky 25 May 2020 14: 43 New
        • 10
        • 7
        +3
        Attached the Ear and Son; not well, they can talk about him, but somehow the circling little star around him does not cause positive thoughts about this character. And his old-fashioned statements in the style of "trampolines" or "for the Tu-160 the next time I fly" ... To me it's all one bald man; he is more than a lover of corn and a cockroach exterminator.
  6. Not_invented 25 May 2020 14: 27 New
    • 27
    • 8
    +19
    Of course Rogozin is right. If you have been a world monopoly in manned launches for 10 years, earned extra profits, like any monopolist, had almost 70 percent of the launches market as a whole, and at the same time you could not earn money to create a new ship to replace the one developed in the USSR - yes, the American You won’t be able to copy the program, because there is clearly something wrong with you.
    1. Sergey39 25 May 2020 14: 57 New
      • 6
      • 12
      -6
      Quote: Not_invented
      yes, you won’t be able to copy the American program,

      And what program? To launch astronauts by Russian ships? Or a program for hanging noodles on the ears of the American electorate?
      1. Voltsky 25 May 2020 15: 11 New
        • 6
        • 4
        +2
        Quote: Sergey39
        And what program? To launch astronauts by Russian ships? Or a program for hanging noodles on the ears of the American electorate?

        You do not notice that the portfolio of orders decreased ?! The main thing is not how the goal is achieved, the main thing is that it is achieved; by dumping or rubbing the blizzard to the electorate, this is not particularly important. Formerly monopolist, losing ground
        1. K-612-O 25 May 2020 15: 32 New
          • 3
          • 1
          +2
          Even 9 years ago, it did not smell like a monopoly, but right now, over 9 years and 2 crises with the collapse of the dollar and ruble, has it fucked up awesome super-profits? Train
          1. Voltsky 25 May 2020 15: 41 New
            • 4
            • 3
            +1
            The message contains inappropriate text for publication.
            what's this ? squandering is not a curse, it’s a disease !?!

            Rogozin simply first promises to be heard publicly, and then sits in a puddle; Well, what the hell are you yelling for the whole world that we’ll do everything now and then zilch. Probably he either needs to reconsider his approaches, or he needs to be tapped on the cap to do more and less to shake.
      2. Not_invented 25 May 2020 15: 15 New
        • 1
        • 2
        -1
        Yes, we should at least have the one that they had to repeat fifty years ago, and I would have been happy about it.
        1. Voltsky 25 May 2020 15: 31 New
          • 4
          • 3
          +1
          Their program, now financially not profitable; too expensive. You would optimize the processes and technology in order to reduce the cost of services to the private sector; because they dump you and try to move you out of the market.
          It’s not bad, of course, to stop rushing from one project to another, the number of fatal errors in the design process with the subsequent closure of the project, for which money was allocated and part has already been mastered, is bewildering.
          Of the advantages from his leadership - only his promises of "mega-projects", with a constant shift of terms to the right, or with the subsequent closure
          1. Not_invented 25 May 2020 16: 07 New
            • 2
            • 2
            0
            You, I believe, did not want to call the promises of "mega-projects" pluses. Thus, there are no pluses. A manager from whose management there are no results. Let us have less money in Roscosmos. So be it. Then choose a project that will definitely be commercially viable, invest all resources in it. For example, a reusable rocket. We have been shouted in Russia for 15 years that this is unprofitable. For some reason, cargo is now being carried on disadvantageous Falcons, and profitable progress is being issued in ever smaller quantities. I'm not saying that you need to drop everything and break into the moon. This is objectively beyond our means. I would like at least some commercial projects. Any. So that space does not develop at the expense of subsidies from the Ministry of Defense for launching tracking satellites without any other perspectives.
            1. Voltsky 25 May 2020 16: 11 New
              • 1
              • 3
              -2
              Quote: Not_invented
              You, I suppose, did not want to call the promises of “mega-projects” a plus. Thus, there are no pluses

              Work is still underway, and some project work is underway - but there is too much failure, and even more idle talk.
              Quote: Not_invented
              We have been shouted in Russia for 15 years that this is unprofitable. For some reason, now the goods are transported to the disadvantageous Falcon

              Well, there dumping is not acidic at prices, and state support is squeezed out of the market (I wrote about this somewhere here)

              To your next text, I have already burst out with my opinions and criticism towards this passenger
    2. 5-9
      5-9 25 May 2020 15: 12 New
      • 10
      • 6
      +4
      And what kind of superprofits did Roskosmos receive?
      As of July 2019, NASA acquired 70 seats in Soyuz worth $ 3,9 billion to deliver US and partner astronauts to the station and back to Earth. "
      This is revenue, what profit is unknown, but even if 30%, then for a lard with a small new ship (and what for it is new, if the old one flies well and if the rocket is old ???).
      If the "American program" means Saturn and the Apollo, then they (and the components of that program) and the USA are not 10 years old, but they can’t copy anymore .. even J-2 ... although it’s more likely that you can’t copy that that only worked in the Kubrick pavilion.
      If the "American program" means that they are now bidding - then there will be nothing and soon will not be, because it’s very difficult to fly to the moon very well .... Let the Americans fly to the ISS in their ship, yes a few years fly accident-free.
      1. Not_invented 25 May 2020 15: 29 New
        • 4
        • 3
        +1
        In 2006, SpaceX became one of the winners of a competition held by NASA under the Commercial Orbital Transportation Services (COTS) program. Under the agreement, the company received about $ 396 million to complete the development and demonstration of the Falcon 9 launch vehicle and Dragon ship (Wikipedia)
        1. 5-9
          5-9 25 May 2020 15: 34 New
          • 7
          • 4
          +3
          What does this rocket and truck have to do with manned flights? How many astronauts have been put into orbit on Dragon, and what kind of trouble is it with buying seats at the gas station Unions?
          And by the way, in 2006 they received, but how many cargo Dragon and how many Progress flew to the ISS from 2010-2020?
          1. Not_invented 25 May 2020 16: 01 New
            • 2
            • 3
            -1
            I gave you an example that the profits from manned launches alone were enough to develop a pair of missiles and a ship, and this is in the States, where everything is more expensive, and by a private company without experience in such development. In 2010, more progress flew. In 2019, more Dragon flies flew.
            1. 5-9
              5-9 25 May 2020 16: 55 New
              • 4
              • 1
              +3
              If you really think that developing Falcon9 and Dragon alone cost $ 396 million, then I don’t see the point in the discussion ... but if you read your copy-paste again, you will find there
              received about $ 396 million to complete Development of and demonstrations

              By the way, what was promised there in 2012, how many years have myriads of American spacecraft been supposed to plow space in 2020? A manned ship with living people in the morning is not right for you ...
          2. donavi49 25 May 2020 16: 34 New
            • 3
            • 2
            +1
            how many freight Dragon and how many Progress flew to the ISS from 2010-2020?


            Usually formed 3-3-2-1. 3-3 - Dragon, Progress. 2 swan. 1 kounotori.

            However, for example, Kounotori usually delivers 6t immediately. A progress of 2,2t.

            More specifically:
            2019 - 3 Progress, 3 Dragon (+1 test, but he also brought supplies), 2 Swans and light Kounotori (5,3 tons in total, but he carried a lot of bulk cargo, experiments).

            2018 - 3 Progress, 3 Dragon, 2 Swans and record heavy Kounotori 6280 kg payloads.

            2017 - 3 Progress, 4 Dragon, 2 Swans, the Japanese did not fly.

            2016 - 3 Progresses (only 2 flew by), 2 Dragon, 2 Swans and 6 tons of Kounotori.

            Well, etc.
            1. slipped 25 May 2020 21: 21 New
              • 1
              • 1
              0
              Quote: donavi49
              More specifically:
              2019 - 3 Progress


              And even more specifically, the unmanned “Soyuz MS-14” for “Progress MS” also worked out in terms of delivery of “dry” cargo. laughing

              In general, "Progress MS" is basically the supply of operational cargoes to the ISS RS.
    3. Disant 25 May 2020 18: 43 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      nor was he able to earn money to create a new ship to replace the one developed in the USSR — yes, you won’t be able to copy the American program, because there is clearly something wrong with you.

      is there something wrong with the “old” ship? The ship is being improved, the concept of building the main components of the ship is impeccable, everything works like a clock.
      Answer, what are the advantages created over the past thirty years of new ones already And created And any other not yet built designed ships?
      And explain what you need to copy from the American program? What exactly?
      1. slipped 25 May 2020 21: 33 New
        • 3
        • 1
        +2
        Quote: Disant
        is there something wrong with the “old” ship? The ship is being improved, the concept of building the main components of the ship is impeccable, everything works like a clock.


        The fact of the matter is that the Soyuz MS is an excellent ship for the ISS. And while the ISS in orbit, the Unions will fly there. That's just here the contingent is imprisoned for another - to lick everything is not ours. laughing

        Quote: Disant
        Answer, what are the advantages created over the past thirty years of new ones already And created And any other not yet built designed ships?


        None at all lol Unless, if it turns out, Dream Chaser can be done, it’s a kind of "under-Spiral." Why is "under"? But the cosmonaut’s safety concept on Spiral was orders of magnitude cooler.



        And Dream Chaser remained at the level of the shuttle - if something happens - everyone will die.
  7. rocket757 25 May 2020 14: 36 New
    • 5
    • 3
    +2
    Two years ago, Dmitry Rogozin headed the state-owned corporation Roscosmos. Much has been done during this time, and more needs to be done.

    Trampolines striped sold or not?
    1. novel66 25 May 2020 14: 42 New
      • 3
      • 5
      -2
      space toilets
      1. rocket757 25 May 2020 14: 44 New
        • 3
        • 5
        -2
        This they would be happy to buy, but the ambition does not allow.
        1. novel66 25 May 2020 14: 57 New
          • 2
          • 4
          -2
          Vit, buy, I know for sure ..
          1. rocket757 25 May 2020 15: 09 New
            • 2
            • 3
            -1
            They can, but Tycho, Tycho! This, of course, is not what sho "hunger is not aunt", but this is also an important archie!
            1. novel66 25 May 2020 15: 13 New
              • 0
              • 3
              -3
              even more important! here the article was gorgeous
              https://topwar.ru/99530-o-proze-zhizni-v-missiyah-apollo.html
              to urge.
    2. Vadim237 26 May 2020 01: 41 New
      • 0
      • 2
      -2
      They have already made their own trampolines as many as four all manned.
      1. rocket757 26 May 2020 06: 32 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        A flag in their hands, God help them ....
  8. parusnik 25 May 2020 14: 37 New
    • 9
    • 4
    +5
    The head of Roskosmos said that now our country has its own lunar program, which is being implemented in stages.
    ... We will master the far side of the moon, so that no one would see ... smile
    1. And at night we’ll fly, so that the skin on the rocket would not heat up.
    2. Sklendarka 25 May 2020 15: 00 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Well then, we will drinks
    3. SOVIET UNION 2 25 May 2020 15: 50 New
      • 2
      • 3
      -1
      Will we explore the moon as the Far East? To all migrants on a free hectare of the moon? What if the sleepwalkers run to the earth from there? laughing
    4. slipped 25 May 2020 22: 45 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Quote: parusnik
      .We will master the back of the moon so that no one would see ... smile


      Especially for those who haven’t seen, I’m showing one of the stages from the Department of Nuclear Planetology of the IKI RAS:



      These are water ice concentration maps as a percentage of the mass of soil in the northern (left) and southern (right) near-polar region of the moon, constructed according to the Russian LEND instrument from the orbit of the moon in 2018.

      The next stage is landing in one of the areas indicated here with a high concentration of ice AMS Luna-25.
      1. A. Privalov 25 May 2020 23: 48 New
        • 2
        • 4
        -2
        Quote: slipped
        The next stage is landing in one of the areas indicated here with a high concentration of ice AMS Luna-25.

        I have areas in the North Pole area. Small - 70 ha. The place is nice, picturesque, near the Plato crater. At a depth of 1 m, the temperature is only -35 C. I have been on Earth in places where it will be colder. So, decide to fly, contact. Say that with VO. I’ll accept as relatives. drinks hi
        1. slipped 25 May 2020 23: 53 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          Quote: A. Privalov
          I have areas in the North Pole area.


          No, we are flying to the South Pole, in the crater of Boguslavsky. laughing

          Potential landing sites:

          1. A. Privalov 26 May 2020 00: 12 New
            • 1
            • 4
            -3
            Quote: slipped
            No, we are flying to the South Pole, in the crater of Boguslavsky.

            Well, fly next time. The invitation remains valid. Here are the coordinates for landing.
  9. Servisinzhener 25 May 2020 14: 47 New
    • 15
    • 4
    +11
    Dmitry Olegovich, what about the Federation ship? Would you like to tell us in anticipation of the launch of Crew Dragon, which will be in 2 days? Something based on plans for a new Russian spacecraft, it seems that it is created according to the concept of Hadji Nasredin.
    Roscosmos is considering the possibility of creating a winged manned spacecraft that will fly to orbital stations. This was stated by the general director of the state corporation Dmitry Rogozin.
    “Now the development of the manned program is connected precisely with the creation of space planes. The United States is conducting trials, such work is being done. We have an idea for a new manned spacecraft in the interests of an orbital station of the same plan ”
    - I’ll venture to suggest that the “Federation” revealed a “fatal flaw”. And those who previously created the Clipper found it.
    Initially, I was skeptical of the embarrassed criticism of Rogozin that was here from the very beginning of my arrival in Roscosmos. And he was inclined to the opinion: Let the person figure out what and how. But two years is more than enough. Let me remind you that the decision to build the Soyuz spacecraft was made in April 62, and the first unmanned launch took place in November 66. And this is without modern machining centers and design systems.
    1. Voltsky 25 May 2020 14: 53 New
      • 2
      • 4
      -2
      Quote: Servisinzhener
      I would venture to suggest that a "fatal flaw" was discovered in the "Federation". And those who previously created Clipper found it.

      very similar to that.
      1. Sklendarka 25 May 2020 15: 27 New
        • 0
        • 4
        -4
        And what, call the yacht ,, Klip r Federation ", it sounds !!!
        1. slipped 25 May 2020 22: 48 New
          • 3
          • 2
          +1
          Quote: Skalendarka
          And what, call the yacht ,, Klip r Federation ", it sounds !!!


          Marie Ivanna, and Vovochka called me a bad word ... lol VO rolls into kindergarten.
    2. SOVIET UNION 2 25 May 2020 15: 57 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      And this is without modern machining centers and design systems.
      Accounting accounts, slide rule and Felix arithmometer turned out to be cooler than modern computers! wassat Even managed to count the salary in the accounts on time and the difference from the current computers! wassat Can we invest in computer technology in vain? After all, the speed of creating products has fallen sharply! At this pace, we will soon be unable to create anything at all! belay repeat winked
      1. Sklendarka 25 May 2020 16: 43 New
        • 6
        • 1
        +5
        How you lagged behind life. Today, money is considered a dump truck, and you are talking about a calculator ... laughing
    3. Disant 25 May 2020 18: 47 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      Dmitry Olegovich, what about the Federation ship?

      I for him:
      where are you going to fly on it and for what purpose? Union is not enough for you? Are there not enough places at all? A line in the sky lined up? Or did someone in the world invent new engines based on new physical principles in order to break away from Earth cheaper?
      1. Servisinzhener 25 May 2020 20: 21 New
        • 3
        • 3
        0
        Stake the moon and Mars. Yes, now it is an extremely expensive undertaking without practical application. Now. But who knows what will happen next, in 100 years. And even less. Russia had such missed opportunities in the 19th and early 20th centuries. As was the case with California and Alaska. 7 years after the sale of possessions in California and 30 years from the sale of Alaska, gold is found there. Kuwait, which at the end of the 19th century requested under the Russian protectorate - why do we need a desert, what's the use of it. A desert in which 13,98 billion tons of proven oil reserves. (in Russia for the same 2013 was 12,74 billion tons).
        When they make new engines, it turns out that everything is already divided.
        1. Disant 25 May 2020 23: 53 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Stake the moon and Mars. Yes, now it is an extremely expensive undertaking without practical application. Now. But who knows what will happen next, in 100 years. And even less.

          I understood you.
          done by
          1) I just looked through the telescope at the Moon, discovered a microcrater on the surface of the Moon, assigned him a number and, with my internal sofa decree, declared the area around it within a radius of one hundred km - my private property.
          2) all lunar Soviet vehicles and landing sites within a radius of 200 km from them by decree number 2 are declared the property of the Russian Federation.
          3) the above decrees are announced publicly, publicly. The coordinates of the crater are indicated in a secret addition.
          The collision is over. Signature
          .
          so okay? mind you, it was cheap - a little of my time.
          What's next?
          .
    4. slipped 25 May 2020 21: 53 New
      • 5
      • 1
      +4
      Quote: Servisinzhener
      Dmitry Olegovich, what about the Federation ship? Would you like to tell us in anticipation of the launch of Crew Dragon, which will be in 2 days?


      This is what you need to be in order to turn to Rogozin here? laughing But I will answer for him, it’s not difficult for me. lol

      Quote: Servisinzhener
      Something based on plans for a new Russian spacecraft, it seems that it is created according to the concept of Hadji Nasredin.


      Is on? laughing You have elections on the nose and urgently need the Moon with a flag stick like Trump? laughing

      In order for a new ship to fly, it requires the construction of a new Amur space rocket complex. And along it, the whole construction site goes to Vostochny, even ahead of schedule for some positions:



      The launch of the first layout in the year 2023.

      Quote: Servisinzhener
      I would venture to suggest that a "fatal flaw" was discovered in the "Federation". And those who previously created the Clipper found it.


      Past

      Quote: Servisinzhener
      Let me remind you that the decision to build the Soyuz spacecraft was made in April 62, and the first unmanned launch took place in November 66. And this is without modern machining centers and design systems.


      You are confusing completely different ships. The 7K-9K-11K Soyuz of 1962, this is not the 7K-OK Soyuz of 1966, and this in turn is not the 7K-S Soyuz-T of 1979. laughing

      And the level of Soyuz and PTK NP is different - these are devices for various tasks.
    5. Vadim237 26 May 2020 01: 46 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      In terms of competing with the West, such dates in the 60s were not surprising, but the technique was weak in reliability and the astronauts died - now we do not have that pace in the competition for this and we are doing it slowly but reliably.
  10. The comment was deleted.
    1. Voltsky 25 May 2020 14: 59 New
      • 7
      • 4
      +3
      In 2015, Interfax reported that 5 billion rubles were stolen during the construction of the Vostochny Cosmodrome. In April 2015 and October 2017, the builders of the Vostochny Cosmodrome went on hunger strike because of wage arrears

      Here is his main accomplishment. if this happens at your enterprise; then a question arises for you as a leader, you either didn’t notice the imbecile, or you’re in share.
      1. Servisinzhener 25 May 2020 15: 20 New
        • 4
        • 2
        +2
        If you go back to the time of the beginning of the Soviet missile program, then events would develop like that. By decree of the Council of Ministers of the USSR, the creation of a cosmodrome began. Comrade Rogozin was appointed responsible. Money spent is unknown where. Workers are hungry. The spaceport is not built on time. Sentence of the military collegium of the Supreme Court of the USSR. Comrade Rogozin was shot.
        1. Voltsky 25 May 2020 15: 33 New
          • 3
          • 3
          0
          Tell Litvinov about the executions, and this is under the brutal Stalin.
      2. Brancodd 25 May 2020 18: 34 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Winnie, so for clarification. Dmitry Rogozin headed Roscosmos 24.05.2018/XNUMX/XNUMX. The construction of the second stage on Vostochny is on schedule, with a slight lead. All payments for settlement with contractors go through the treasury.
        1. Voltsky 25 May 2020 18: 41 New
          • 1
          • 3
          -2
          but he’s been talking for a long time :) over there, he’s quite quietly working, many people don’t even know who he is heading. although I emphasize in red not wherever I went through it in this topic I was absolutely right, but no one pulled his tongue either :)
          1. Brancodd 25 May 2020 18: 54 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Well, you don’t know who he headed and is now heading. Speak for yourself. For example, say I was mistaken with my red pencil when I connected Rogozin with the thefts in eastern 2015-12017. But it doesn’t turn out beautifully. It turns out, as it were, to say more delicately that you "tremble" just ...
            1. Voltsky 25 May 2020 18: 59 New
              • 0
              • 3
              -3
              no, here I connected him correctly with this scam; he missed it and overlooked it, if you didn’t notice what your wife instructed your horns - then you’re a fool, well, or if you prefer a “naive lover”
              You chose people who will follow this, it was you who invited them, it was you who made a mistake in their choice ... The only guilty party is fortune, evil rock
              ps
              I know who leads Rosatom if that, not graying dadka :)
              1. Brancodd 25 May 2020 19: 28 New
                • 2
                • 0
                +2
                Well, Rogozin was choosing the second turn of the eastern contractors. And he is personally responsible for this second turn. So let's look at the result. And with the first stage, the story was different. And other people chose contractors. As for control, the new leadership of Roscosmos in the UK transferred materials about theft. On their basis, dozens (about a hundred) of criminal cases were initiated. Quite influential characters did not like it. Mamutu, for example. The information resources under his control began the corresponding work. This is lenta.ru, rambler. Among their publications you will not find a single positive about Roskosmos and not only. About any achievement of Rosatom, VPK. But Roscosmos, at the tip of the pen. It is curious, for example, in 2012-2016, Roscosmos was not subjected to such attacks, although it was in a coma
                1. Voltsky 25 May 2020 19: 41 New
                  • 0
                  • 3
                  -3
                  Quote: Brancodd
                  Well, Rogozin was choosing the second turn of the eastern contractors.

                  Ripened, nevertheless thought - that construction is the most transparent type of activity; and it’s what it’s like ... as it was, "it never happened before, and here it is again"
                  Quote: Brancodd
                  Quite influential characters did not like it.

                  this is normal - no one likes it, excessive attention when you stick to the state feeder, and they take you for a wet udder.
                  Quote: Brancodd
                  Among their publications you will not find a single positive about Roskosmos and not only.

                  I have a different mindset, I look at the numbers, but I also don’t miss the publications of those in charge; balabolil-get and sign
                  Quote: Brancodd
                  About any achievement of Rosatom, VPK. But Roscosmos, at the tip of the pen. It is curious, for example, in 2012-2016.

                  It’s a normal practice, competitors entered the cashier’s office, and we generously pour shit on those we paid for.
                  Quote: Brancodd
                  It is curious, for example, in 2012-2016, Roscosmos was not subjected to such attacks, although it was in a coma

                  Now he is there, until Dmitry is quieter outside, and more active inside
        2. Voltsky 25 May 2020 18: 57 New
          • 0
          • 3
          -3
          added:
          he wants recognition, I understand that he was in charge of the military-industrial complex in his time; maybe some things that are now in the army is his merit. Vanity is not good, especially when you sincerely desire it so much - it pushes people away.
  11. Shahno 25 May 2020 15: 16 New
    • 2
    • 3
    -1
    And for some reason it seemed to me? Why not repeat, change the orbit, sit in another square ....
  12. Shahno 25 May 2020 15: 24 New
    • 2
    • 4
    -2
    Quote: K-612-O
    I'm afraid to ask, what do you know about our lunar program? What devices are being built and developed, launch dates, media type? What is the concept at all?
    And by the way, you can cram into someone, of course, but looking at China, which so far has only been able to copy Soviet space, this is not a progressive matter.
    And about the decay and all the rest of the above, it’s for you in MK or Echo.

    I'm afraid they’ll beat me now. But even the Israeli lunar program is more successful ... The satellite then ended up on the Moon in the end ...
    1. mark2 25 May 2020 16: 35 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      You agree on how he ended up there. The Jews collected something with a transmitter, but how was it delivered there?
  13. milestone 25 May 2020 15: 35 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    Mr. Rogozin, apparently, is covering up the weakness of the Russian cosmonautics, as it is now fashionable to do now, with the “mistakes” of the Soviet Union. Where was Soviet cosmonautics and where are we?
  14. Pvi1206 25 May 2020 15: 48 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    the philosopher should not lead the Cosmos ...
  15. 7,62h54 25 May 2020 16: 10 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Dunno will help the moonstone. Trampoline is not modern.
  16. Freedim 25 May 2020 16: 46 New
    • 2
    • 3
    -1
    (C)

    Here we are ... So what? ...
  17. Shahno 25 May 2020 16: 48 New
    • 0
    • 2
    -2
    Quote: mark2
    You agree on how he ended up there. The Jews collected something with a transmitter, but how was it delivered there?

    And I agree. Our experts ... Material resources are not ours. Our connections, and the money is not ours ...
    Well, something with a transmitter is not able to get to the surface. What are you speaking about.
  18. Trickster 25 May 2020 16: 54 New
    • 1
    • 3
    -2
    All right, comrade says, you need to give an asymmetric answer to the American printing press.
  19. Brancodd 25 May 2020 16: 58 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    To build any plans, even a very modest resource is needed. Including financial. Now the annual budget of Roscosmos is $ 3 billion. In 2016, Medvedev cut him 2 times. With these funds, several programs are developed that must be completed. This is the construction of the east, Soyuz5, Angara. Do not forget about the program of the Ministry of Defense. There is very little left for scientific research and promising developments. If society as a whole is ready to redirect some of the resources to the development of the space program, then the range of tasks can be expanded.
  20. APASUS 25 May 2020 17: 07 New
    • 2
    • 8
    -6

    Why not copy it? Yes and it will not be expensive
  21. Clueless 25 May 2020 17: 10 New
    • 5
    • 3
    +2
    Yes, no where we will not fly, because these Rogozins and other abominations will then already be retired. Now their work can only be promised.
    1. kenig1 25 May 2020 18: 37 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      You shouldn’t be so, Rogozin is a talented journalist (irony).
  22. vkd.dvk 25 May 2020 17: 32 New
    • 1
    • 4
    -3
    Quote: Jack O'Neill
    Well, Rogozin is right. Americans can afford a lot more, in view of the fact that more money is corny.
    But to master along with the Americans, it is much cheaper, and in both directions. So we need to cooperate!

    We already have experience working with Americans. At least during the Second World War.
    You should stay away from such an employee. Not to interfere with their work, but also not to allow them to come to you. Own station, own program of space exploration and the lunar surface. With Mars we can wait.
  23. Pavel73 25 May 2020 17: 34 New
    • 5
    • 3
    +2
    Well, in principle, having your own orbital station, with the Americans fly to the moon, why not? They flew with us to Mir, together with us they made the ISS. And they were not shy at all, and did not consider themselves flawed. I don’t see anything bad if the Russian cosmonauts fly with the Americans to the moon.
    1. Klingon 25 May 2020 19: 34 New
      • 3
      • 3
      0
      first, Mr. Rogozin will have to publicly apologize for the trampoline and chew his tie. And then yes, you can fly wassat
      1. Pavel73 25 May 2020 21: 35 New
        • 2
        • 3
        -1
        The trampoline was intended for domestic consumption, and everyone is well aware of this. There in America for domestic consumption they still don’t say that about us. And we don’t chew ties, this is the lot of Limitrophs.
        1. Venya Selnikov 26 May 2020 13: 42 New
          • 0
          • 1
          -1
          You will be surprised, but our news sites and forums very much read abroad. There is no "internal consumption" now, these are just stupid things. There is public and non-public. Rogozin speaks out publicly, and to the whole world.
          And statements that come from a senior official in the Russian space industry are taken (and remembered) quite seriously. Also, as if they were expressed by the head of NASA (but he is not so stupid as to say this). And, if you think that they do not know how to read the mood between our Russian lines - it’s also not worth it ... they all understand perfectly. I on reddit and nasaspaceflight more than once crossed with those who say that lately you can’t deal with Russians because of their statements in the direction of the United States, regardless of the fact that it can and is profitably purely for money.
        2. military_cat 26 May 2020 14: 19 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: Pavel73
          The trampoline was intended for domestic consumption, and everyone is well aware of this.
          Quite the contrary, Rogozin’s words are taken seriously there: https://spacenews.com/40547rogozin-calls-for-ban-on-us-military-use-of-rd-180/

          You do not remember this, because it was May 2014, then everyone was expecting that now we were about to get to Kiev, and then to Washington, and such statements did not seem to be an important part of the agenda.
  24. vkd.dvk 25 May 2020 17: 43 New
    • 0
    • 5
    -5
    Quote: Servisinzhener
    If you go back to the time of the beginning of the Soviet missile program, then events would develop like that. By decree of the Council of Ministers of the USSR, the creation of a cosmodrome began. Comrade Rogozin was appointed responsible. Money spent is unknown where. Workers are hungry. The spaceport is not built on time. Sentence of the military collegium of the Supreme Court of the USSR. Comrade Rogozin was shot.

    Anyone can write nonsense.
    If you go back in time, then there would be no independents of different ukrofashists. The factories of Dnepropetrovsk would rivet rockets, make new projects, Kazakhstan did not bother with ecology and earning dough, Estonians sculpted electronics, and proud Georgians worked in the mines of Rustavi. The KGB generals would not have accumulated tons of their homes in the apartments of their father-in-law. The Attorney General would not protect the underground gambling business. you, if only he leaned out on the Internet, would be put in 15 minutes for 10 years without the right to correspondence.
    And everyone would be in business. Peoples would be resettled for the past, future, and present. A new and more devastating collapse of the country would be forged by crazy projects, the organization of mismanagement, postscripts and general indifference.
    Read the Strugatsky.
    “If you were given the opportunity to improve the world, what would you change?” Don Rumata asks Budakh.
    - Nature is perfect. Why improve what is reasonable.
    “Would you like to give advice to God now?”
    - God does not need advice.
    - And still imagine. What would you ask for people?
    - I would ask the Creator: give us bread, wine, meat, give us a roof and clothes, then need and contention will disappear.
    “But the strong will again take their share from the weak.” And the weak will become as poor as they were.
    “I will ask the Creator so that people do not rob each other of what is given to them.”
    “But will it help?” If a person gets everything without making an effort, he will become lazy and indifferent.
    - I will tell the Lord: arrange so that everyone loves his work and knowledge, so that wisdom becomes the main meaning of human existence.
    “But that would mean wiping the human race off the face of the Earth and creating a new one.”
    - Then, Lord, sweep us off the face of the Earth and create us in a new guise, peaceful and pure.

    “I am convinced that evil is ineradicable.” Each of the worlds has its own fate and it is pointless to impose another. Therefore, it is wise to leave us as we are. I will ask God to give us the strength to find our way. "

    This is about us.
  25. kenig1 25 May 2020 17: 48 New
    • 5
    • 4
    +1
    What Moon, Rogozin the bowels of the Sun plans to explore.
  26. Dazdranagon 25 May 2020 17: 57 New
    • 4
    • 3
    +1
    Found someone to compete with! About ... whether space, forget it all! It was a more advanced civilization! Now would catch up with India.
  27. Knell wardenheart 25 May 2020 18: 05 New
    • 6
    • 3
    +3
    A terrible person, and at the same time a great dreamer, populist and rubbish. He would not have promised better, but would have substantiated why the deadlines for space products are shifting us for decades ..
  28. vkd.dvk 25 May 2020 18: 12 New
    • 2
    • 3
    -1
    Quote: Pavel73
    Well, in principle, having your own orbital station, with the Americans fly to the moon, why not? They flew with us to Mir, together with us they made the ISS. And they were not shy at all, and did not consider themselves flawed. I don’t see anything bad if the Russian cosmonauts fly with the Americans to the moon.

    On what terms? On our ship, or on them? On a joint? How to match requirements and constructs? For what money? On them? But then we will lose the ability to steer our pieces of iron. On ours? Enough of opportunities? We will not be disgraced with terms? We will pay the penalty by transferring ownership of our iron to them. Not equal, not very equal opportunity. Make cogs on your penny? Then we will ask for the opportunity to twist them from a rich EMPLOYEE.
    When we flew together in the Soyuz-Apollo program, a very ancient version of the ship was made specially for this program (by TODAY standards). At the training, the Americans were swollen with laughter, unless IT flies, like. I myself noticed that BEFORE this flight, the television picture from orbit was almost like a real one, from a television studio. But when flying with amers. the image was again low-line and low-frame.
    In order not to show them our achievements.
    1. kenig1 25 May 2020 18: 27 New
      • 2
      • 2
      0
      It’s dangerous to fly with the Americans, they’ll still drill holes. laughing
  29. Klingon 25 May 2020 19: 30 New
    • 3
    • 4
    -1
    if the Dragon starts the day after tomorrow and everything goes according to plan, it will be such a good scumbag to Mr. Rogozin, then he can publicly wipe his trampoline ... well, or as an alternative, eat your tie! wassat
    something like this .. you need to answer for the bazaar, uncle!
  30. Grading 25 May 2020 19: 36 New
    • 4
    • 8
    -4
    Quote: Stroporez
    Quote: poquello
    no matter what he says, everything goes on as usual, but in general his words do not differ much from the process, adjusted for thick circumstances such as various sanctions and other bourgeois counteractions

    In any case, bourgeois Musk is more preferable to me than bourgeois ragozin. One rocket launches, and the other balabol trampoline.




  31. pardonov 25 May 2020 20: 11 New
    • 2
    • 3
    -1
    Rogozin warned of an extraterrestrial threat. This is reported by Rambler. The head of Roskosmos, Dmitry Rogozin, in an interview on Komsomolskaya Pravda radio, said that in the future, with a high degree of probability, Russia will be able to protect the Earth from "uninvited guests from outer space." It is reported by Rambler. Next: https://news.rambler.ru/world/44238937/?utm_content=mnews_media&utm_medium=read_more&utm_source=copylink
    1. Vadim237 26 May 2020 01: 53 New
      • 1
      • 3
      -2
      A system for warning meteorite danger began to be developed in 2013, when a 17-meter meter exploded over Chelyabinsk since then 7 years have passed - and they have not created any system and just forgot about it.
      1. slipped 27 May 2020 04: 27 New
        • 0
        • 1
        -1
        Quote: Vadim237
        and they didn’t create any system, they just forgot about it.


        This is not entirely true, the MASTER system of robotic telescopes was used to search for new, potentially dangerous objects. Read at your leisure what kind of network it is.

  32. DDT
    DDT 25 May 2020 20: 22 New
    • 1
    • 4
    -3
    Rogozhin, go scared that they would call him a repeat pig?
  33. Revival 25 May 2020 21: 18 New
    • 0
    • 3
    -3
    Everything is simpler: we will not
  34. vkd.dvk 25 May 2020 21: 38 New
    • 2
    • 3
    -1
    Quote: Klingon
    if the Dragon starts the day after tomorrow and everything goes according to plan, it will be such a good scumbag to Mr. Rogozin, then he can publicly wipe his trampoline ... well, or as an alternative, eat your tie! wassat
    something like this .. you need to answer for the bazaar, uncle!

    We will bark AFTER the flight.
    To the good statistics of accident-free flights to them as to Mongolia on karachik. And a couple of five cases of successful salvation in an emergency, as we had.
    1. fider 26 May 2020 11: 58 New
      • 1
      • 2
      -1
      vkd.dvk
      "... as was with us."
      And as many emergency ones?
  35. vkd.dvk 25 May 2020 21: 44 New
    • 3
    • 5
    -2
    Quote: Grading
    Quote: Stroporez
    Quote: poquello
    no matter what he says, everything goes on as usual, but in general his words do not differ much from the process, adjusted for thick circumstances such as various sanctions and other bourgeois counteractions

    In any case, bourgeois Musk is more preferable to me than bourgeois ragozin. One rocket launches, and the other balabol trampoline.







    The mask before our achievements takes years. And that is unlikely. We did NEW, and he came to everything ready.
    I prefer any OUR, and those like you need to hang on birches, better, just two.
    1. Vadim237 26 May 2020 01: 57 New
      • 3
      • 3
      0
      And what was he ready for - NASA did not have returnable first stages of methane rocket propeller fairings and reusable cargo and manned capsule ships.
  36. vkd.dvk 25 May 2020 21: 49 New
    • 2
    • 5
    -3
    Quote: Stroporez
    Quote: poquello
    ? Rogozin said that Russia has its own plans, and many of them do not seem to provide for cooperation with the United States.

    if Ragozin did not say anything at all, then there would be more benefit from him.

    If you were to go somewhere ...... me. then you would be of more use.
    1. Brancodd 25 May 2020 22: 13 New
      • 5
      • 2
      +3
      Well, in principle, I agree, it would be nice. Tired of crying Yaroslavna. According to the allocated funds, the current Roscosmos program looks realistic. The second launch pad in the East, Angara, Union 5. There is confidence that will be realized. By the way, for a year and 8 months - trouble-free. 34 launches successful. So let EKA with its burning Vegas get closer to this result, then we'll talk about efficiency. Such are the things.
  37. iouris 25 May 2020 21: 51 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    Mania grandioso.
  38. vkd.dvk 25 May 2020 21: 53 New
    • 3
    • 4
    -1
    Quote: Pavel73
    Well, in principle, having your own orbital station, with the Americans fly to the moon, why not? They flew with us to Mir, together with us they made the ISS. And they were not shy at all, and did not consider themselves flawed. I don’t see anything bad if the Russian cosmonauts fly with the Americans to the moon.

    Do you know the results of cooperation in World War II? If we were the same boorish then on an equal footing could. These uki turn everything out without a notion of honor and conscience.
    So, giving them the opportunity, even in the smallest, is impossible.
    Perform your program, and that's it.
  39. vkd.dvk 26 May 2020 00: 04 New
    • 3
    • 4
    -1
    Quote: kenig1
    What Moon, Rogozin the bowels of the Sun plans to explore.

    Want to seem witty? Then be silent louder.
  40. slipped 26 May 2020 00: 16 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    The "private" Branson from Virgin Orbits had a booster accident at the initial stage of the flight after starting the engine.



    the experimental load was covered with a copper basin. sad
    1. Vadim237 26 May 2020 01: 59 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      Looks like they hurried and did not check.
  41. tolmachiev51 26 May 2020 02: 17 New
    • 3
    • 3
    0
    Dreamer-planner !!! Launch the Vostochny spaceport to start !!!
  42. fif21 26 May 2020 08: 39 New
    • 2
    • 4
    -2
    Dima ! Moderate your appetites. Roskosmos is mastering billions, and the middle class in the country has an income of 17 tons. Cooperate with China, the EU, with a damn bald and live within your means. The budget will not pull your imagination. hi
    1. Kat
      Kat 26 May 2020 09: 19 New
      • 2
      • 4
      -2
      Quote: fif21
      Dima ! Moderate your appetites. Roskosmos is mastering billions, and the middle class in the country has an income of 17 tons. Cooperate with China, the EU, with a damn bald and live within your means. The budget will not pull your imagination. hi

      It would be better if I handed out money to pensioners and made reliable roads to Moscow for NATO tanks ..)))) A familiar song of neoliberovs since 2000 x ..
      1. fif21 26 May 2020 09: 33 New
        • 1
        • 2
        -1
        Quote: Kat
        It would be better if I handed out money to pensioners and made reliable roads to Moscow for NATO tanks ..)))) A familiar song of neoliberovs since 2000 x ..

        Only pale policeman can step twice on the same rake. laughing Nothing is changing in Russia! Like always, two problems - not smart people and roads! wassat
        1. Brancodd 26 May 2020 21: 21 New
          • 0
          • 1
          -1
          That's what does not change so is the presence of Smerdyakov. The great writer was right, their nagging is the eternal background of Russian life ...
    2. Brancodd 26 May 2020 12: 46 New
      • 1
      • 2
      -1
      Sasha die your appetites. Well, Roscosmos certainly doesn’t have you lunch. The budget of Roscosmos - 3mrd. $.
      1. fif21 26 May 2020 13: 59 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        Quote: Brancodd
        Sasha die your appetites. Well, Roscosmos certainly doesn’t have you lunch. The budget of Roscosmos - 3mrd. $.

        Dima! How much can you overeat the budget ?! It's time to earn more than you spend. You do not fit into the capitalist economy. There is a redhead, long ago at self-sufficiency. The elections are coming soon, and you and your Angora have already taken out your whole brain. hi
        1. Brancodd 27 May 2020 12: 31 New
          • 0
          • 1
          -1
          Tell it to NASA and EKA. The cost of space in the United States, why only NASA expenses are always indicated. But this is only 40% of the US budget for space.
          In 2017, NASA expenditures amounted to $ 18,1 billion. Total US budget expenditures amounted to $ 47,5 billion.
          The budgets of space agencies are everywhere expendable to become budgets.
  43. Jurkovs 26 May 2020 08: 49 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    Rogozin: We will not repeat the moon exploration program for the Americans

    because we can’t. If they could, then they would definitely repeat it.
  44. SERSH1972 26 May 2020 09: 29 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    Rogozin says well .... Beautiful ... What he studied !!! But is it in its place ??
    1. Brancodd 26 May 2020 12: 49 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      A year and 8 months without accidents. 37 accident-free starts. For 30 post-Soviet years, this was not. China has 3 accidents during this time, ESA has 2 accidents
      1. slipped 26 May 2020 13: 37 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        Quote: Brancodd
        China has 3 accidents during this time, ESA has 2 accidents


        And America has an accident yesterday ... laughing By the way, China has more - they already have two this year.
  45. olhon 26 May 2020 09: 46 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Space Jumper number 1.
  46. ruivit1988 26 May 2020 09: 47 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    As he said there, we have our own path ... Well, the path is already known to everyone, I want to twist the torment of torment. Here they promised us a new ship Clipper. Where is he!? We were promised our own national station. Where is she? New launch vehicle. Where is he again? Lunar base, where is she ?! And other things. In general, here it is our way, to tell fables about how our ships plow the space. Alas, this is our way of exploring the moon.
    1. Brancodd 26 May 2020 12: 52 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      What did you personally promise? This year will be the launch of the Angara. From 2023, the Omsk plant will go into serial production. In the same year will be the first start of the Angara from the East.
  47. vkd.dvk 26 May 2020 10: 01 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Quote: Vadim237
    And what was he ready for - NASA did not have returnable first stages of methane rocket propeller fairings and reusable cargo and manned capsule ships.

    This, of course, exceeds the volume, timing, and cost of Korolev’s work.
    He received Marilyn free of charge from the closed lunar program. A few dozens. What makes him have as many as 9? Because the characteristics of the lunar module did not require another. Closed design bureaus, launch complexes. equipment, space materials, electronics, astronomy, precision engineering of the country, stands, patents and financing.
    1. Vadim237 26 May 2020 14: 08 New
      • 0
      • 2
      -2
      The Lunar module is one thing - the reusable first stages of the rocket are completely different; those engines from the Lunar program that he received were simply taken as the basis for the new engine of the reusable Merlin - Korolev the same rocketry didn’t come from scratch; it evolved as the engineering of materials science and the state into Soviet space the program allocated a lot of money.
  48. vkd.dvk 26 May 2020 12: 04 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    Quote: fider
    vkd.dvk
    "... as was with us."
    And as many emergency ones?

    Is laziness or lack of sense preventing you from finding it yourself? Self-found convinces better. The last time the crew with the American was rescued.
  49. Evgeny Strygin 26 May 2020 12: 44 New
    • 2
    • 3
    -1
    domestic space can be buried. It is sad to tears, but it is a reality.
    What kind of head on the TV says that we have everything tip-top is not important.
    1. slipped 26 May 2020 13: 49 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Quote: Yevgeny Strygin
      domestic space can be buried.


      I ran away. laughing Only in the last five months the Russian orbital group has replenished six new spacecraft and is already 169 spacecraft. Moreover, most of these are heavy and medium-sized devices with a long active life.
    2. Vadim237 26 May 2020 14: 10 New
      • 2
      • 2
      0
      We are waiting for the start of the Angara and Irtysh until 2023.
      1. slipped 26 May 2020 21: 28 New
        • 0
        • 1
        -1
        By the way, in TK all the same Soyuz-5, and not Irtysh, although who knows what they will call after launch. laughing
    3. orionvitt 26 May 2020 21: 40 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      Quote: Yevgeny Strygin
      domestic space can be buried

      Domestic space, on a regular basis, carries "American tourists" to the ISS. Which for nine years they have not been able to reach orbit independently. And for the domestic space, this is a routine. So who to bury then? We'll see tomorrow. How the Americans will announce the next "victory of democracy and the US leadership in space." laughing
  50. vkd.dvk 26 May 2020 14: 15 New
    • 0
    • 2
    -2
    Quote: Vadim237
    The Lunar module is one thing - the reusable first stages of the rocket are completely different; those engines from the Lunar program that he received were simply taken as the basis for the new engine of the reusable Merlin - Korolev the same rocketry didn’t come from scratch; it evolved as the engineering of materials science and the state into Soviet space the program allocated a lot of money.

    Are you a final boob, or just a beginner?