Clash on the border between India and Pakistan: there are losses on both sides

The Indian press reports a clash on the border with Pakistan. It is stated that the Indian border guards "took retaliatory measures" against the Pakistani military, which carried out shelling of three settlements at once: Kasbah, Kearney and Shahpur.

According to reports, several soldiers, as well as civilians, were injured as a result of the shelling on the Indian side.

As a result of a retaliatory strike (according to some reports, mortars and artillery systems were used), Pakistani troops lost four troops.

Mutual shelling was carried out in Kashmir, where just a few days ago, Indian paratroopers died, including representatives of the officers. Then, according to some reports, the Indian landing party was trapped and fell under the crossfire of militants. The Ministry of Defense of India believes that the militants who organized the ambush are sponsored by Islamabad.

The situation in Kashmir remains tense. According to some reports, additional forces and military equipment are being pulled together from both sides to the confrontation area.

Indian Army Press Officer:

The adversary must answer for his provocations against our civilians and military personnel.

Comments

[Walrus fang]

Again, the game and a little blood is allowed to each other .. Such a mentality, well, they like it!

Although the West may create a more serious provocation .. I hope they have direct phones on the General Staff.?

[alone]

Quote: Walrus Fang

Although the West may create a more serious provocation .. I hope they have direct phones on the General Staff.?

It has been going on for almost 70 years ... Yes, of course they will calm down .. not the first time

[AUL]

Again, someone was the first to return fire ... Here are just a showdown between the nuclear powers now and not enough!

[Astra wild]

In fact, Pakistan and India are one nation, but their religion has split.

[To be or not to be]

Quote: Astra wild

In fact, Pakistan and India are one nation, but their religion has split.

Is religion? or there were storytellers beyond the hill. using the religious factor?

[abvgdeika]

Definitely, these are the machinations of imperialism.

[Zeev Zeev]

Foreign splitters actually created India from hundreds of independent principalities and dozens of different peoples with different cultures, religions, languages. But it was divided into Pakistan, India and East Pakistan (Bangladesh) on its own.

[demiurg]

What are you saying?
And forgive the Mongols in the 12th century, fought in the Indus Valley?
The fact that the borders have changed repeatedly since then, I believe. Well, so in Europe there is Poland mocking about the borders of the 16th century from Mozh to Mozh.
India is a multinational state whose history can be traced back to the Sumerians.

[Zeev Zeev]

That's what I say. In the 12th century, Temujin Esugeevich (better known as Genghis Khan) sent his tumens not to the Indus Valley, but to the Amu Darya Valley. If you are talking about the Mughal empire that arose in the 16th century, then it did not occupy the entire territory of British India (from which the above states arose).

[demiurg]

Okay, I repent, I got it wrong with the dates.
If you started to find fault with the territories occupied in the 12-16th century and modern, tell us on what basis do people who preach Judaism occupy and genocide the local population in the territory of which Turkey previously owned? The fact that the Jews have a shrine there, do not care. Jerusalem is a holy city for all Abrahamic religions. What right do Jews living in Poland, Russia, or France have in the ghetto to evict people who have lived on this earth since the Sumerians? But how it all began compassionately, do not shoot, we fled from the genocide.

[Zeev Zeev]

There are no "since the time of the Sumerians" here. The overwhelming majority of local Arabs are newcomers from Arab countries of the last 200 (more than half over the last 100) years. And everyone who lives longer than this period is the Islamized descendants of Jews and Samaritans.
Now about genocide and occupation. Occupation is when one country occupies the territory of another. Which country was occupied by Israel?
Genocide is when there is a targeted destruction of some ethnic or religious group. For example - the mass killings of ISIS Yezidis (banned in Russia).
The result of the genocide is a sharp decrease in this group in general or in a given territory. Attention to the question. How many Arabs were there in the territory of Mandatory Palestine in 1920, when part of the Ottoman Empire was transferred to the British Empire for (quote) "creating a Jewish national home", and how many are there now?

[demiurg]

Good believe. 200 years is not a term. Then 2-3-4-5 Aliya is it all come in large numbers?
I still did not understand why the Polish Jews who fought in England and France occupy the territory of the Islamic state. Why do these people ignore UN resolution No. 181?
Show with numbers that Muslims under occupation breed better than in the same Syria or Egypt.

[Zeev Zeev]

1-2-3-4-5 Aliya is returning to her homeland. And the territory of which Islamic state are we occupying here? The Ottoman Empire ceased to exist in 1918.
As for resolution 181 of the UN General Assembly. Can you first find out what kind of resolution it is, what its legal force is, and what conditions are necessary for its entry into force?

[demiurg]

Which homeland? What do Polish Jews have to do with ancient Israel?

[Zeev Zeev]

Polish, Belarusian, Yemeni, Romanian, Moroccan, Czech, Iraqi, Turkish and even Russian Jews are directly related to ancient Israel. Direct historical, cultural, religious, linguistic, etc. attitude.

[pv1005]

Quote: Astra wild

In fact, Pakistan and India are one nation, but their religion has split.

One people? Why is it that there is a "tribe" on a "tribe".

[SSR]

Quote: Astra wild

In fact, Pakistan and India are one nation, but their religion has split.

In general, the comrade, they were split by the Anglo-Saxons as BV and APR, the most parasitic nation, they drew borders as they wanted, they did and did not care about geography and ethnicity.

[Yurahip]

Krsaaasavtsy !!! Straight young cockerels!

[Astra wild]

If it were the "powers" of the Upper Volta or Swaziland equals, I would not pay attention, but Pakistan and India have nuclear weapons. Of course, they will not be throwing nuclear weapons now, but I am not pleased to realize that nuclear weapons can start at any moment

[Barmaleyka]

well, they are throwing on the other side of the Pamirs, I don’t think that their arsenal is absolutely sky-high in volume

[Astra wild]

Hope you just joked. Whatever arsenals they have, but not the wine people will perish. I'm not talking about the environment. Remember what Chernobyl did, and they have enough charges for 5-6 Chernobyl there.
If you saw what mutants are born after. I once saw and always lasted

[Barmaleyka]

Quote: Astra wild

Whatever arsenals they have, but not the wine people will perish.

fair?
I don’t give a damn about them as they do about us, although I die, forward and with a song

[Sergey Averchenkov]

Innocents always die, where have you seen differently? Ecology in the war? Are you laughing In short, your experiences are stupid. There will be war, there will be casualties in the midst of peace, there will be mutants and much more - this is war.

[demiurg]

In Chernobyl in the 4th block there were about 200 tons of uranium. Kuzkina’s mother, 200 megatons is just 15-17 tons of fissile material. Only the USA and the Russian Federation have more than 200 tons of uranium in warheads, possibly China, but not very possible. India and Pakistan have approximately 100 charges, each with approximately 50-75kg of fissile material.

[abvgdeika]

Here also in the world belong to Russia !!!!

[Thrifty]

The lack of common sense, and the desire to live peacefully with neighbors is at hand for anyone, but not for the population of these countries, which used to be one country.

[abvgdeika]

India !!!!!

[Barmaleyka]

to be honest, then at least they’ll kill each other’s friend completely

[Mountain shooter]

An endless story ... So they will, try each other "to the teeth" ... Taking into account the presence of nuclear weapons on both sides, skirmishes at the border will give absolutely no result ... A decisive advantage of one of the parties will lead to a signal with a nuclear baton .. . with a predictable result.

[Valery Valery]

Pakistanis and Indians kill each other, but their blood is in the hands of the Queen of England

[abvgdeika]

Iron logic

[Ravil_Asnafovich]

Before that, there was a shootout between Tajiks and Kyrgyz; they can also divide the border, badly, very badly.

[Ravil_Asnafovich]

Kalashnikovs are armed.

[abvgdeika]

What money was enough, se la vie

[Astra wild]

Rather, common sense: it is better to buy cheaper, but more reliable than expensive, but moody. The husband said that the M-16 is well made, but capricious and requires tenderness + more

[Lord of the Sith]

Camouflage turban, this is clowning

[Astra wild]

Quote: To be or not to be

Quote: Astra wild

In fact, Pakistan and India are one nation, but their religion has split.

Is religion? or there were storytellers beyond the hill. using the religious factor?

Rather, someone takes advantage of the existing split

[Astra wild]

Quote: Barmaleyka

Quote: Astra wild

Whatever arsenals they have, but not the wine people will perish.

fair?
I don’t give a damn about them as they do about us, although I die, forward and with a song

If it is violet to you that women and children will die, then think about the environment. Our ecosystem is very vulnerable

[knn54]

When India and Pakistan, the so-called principalities, were formed in 1947, or rather, the Rajas, they were given the opportunity to choose which country to join. The religious factor turned out to be important. In Jammu and Kashmir, the majority of the population was Muslim, but its head, Hari Singh, was a Hindu.

[Andrey Vasilievich]

Quote: knn54

When India and Pakistan, the so-called principalities, were formed in 1947, or rather, the Rajas, they were given the opportunity to choose which country to join. The religious factor turned out to be important. In Jammu and Kashmir, the majority of the population was Muslim, but its head, Hari Singh, was a Hindu.

His last name indicates that he was a Sikh

[abvgdeika]

Are you for red or for white ?

[Pandiurin]

It seemed (not from this news) that the Indians consider themselves militarily, without taking into account nuclear weapons, much cooler than the Pakistanis. Therefore, they implement a more aggressive version of the confrontation. Pakistan is more restrained, i.e. there is an answer from him, but just to maintain parity, but carefully so as not to exceed some trait. If there are any provocations from Pakistan then mediated through third parties. Hindus, however, do not hesitate to use the armed forces against the armed forces of Pakistan.
For such an explosive region is very irresponsible.

[Astra wild]

Perhaps you are right: Pakistanis are more restrained. What explains this, I do not know. Perhaps the Indians have some deep antipathies: there was Great India, but there were destroyers, etc.?

[Astra wild]

Quote: Sergey Averchenkov

Innocents always die, where have you seen differently? Ecology in the war? Are you laughing In short, your experiences are stupid. There will be war, there will be casualties in the midst of peace, there will be mutants and much more - this is war.

So you are for the war and the destruction of the environment ?!

[Zomanus]

Yes, they are constantly chopped there. Now one or two weeks and again everything will calm down.