Clash on the border between India and Pakistan: there are losses on both sides

Clash on the border between India and Pakistan: there are losses on both sides

The Indian press reports a clash on the border with Pakistan. It is stated that the Indian border guards "took retaliatory measures" against the Pakistani military, which carried out shelling of three settlements at once: Kasbah, Kearney and Shahpur.


According to reports, several soldiers, as well as civilians, were injured as a result of the shelling on the Indian side.

As a result of a retaliatory strike (according to some reports, mortars and artillery systems were used), Pakistani troops lost four troops.

Mutual shelling was carried out in Kashmir, where just a few days ago, Indian paratroopers died, including representatives of the officers. Then, according to some reports, the Indian landing party was trapped and fell under the crossfire of militants. The Ministry of Defense of India believes that the militants who organized the ambush are sponsored by Islamabad.

The situation in Kashmir remains tense. According to some reports, additional forces and military equipment are being pulled together from both sides to the confrontation area.

Indian Army Press Officer:

The adversary must answer for his provocations against our civilians and military personnel.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

45 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Walrus fang 10 May 2020 12: 56 New
    • 7
    • 8
    -1
    Again, the game and a little blood is allowed to each other .. Such a mentality, well, they like it!

    Although the West may create a more serious provocation .. I hope they have direct phones on the General Staff.?
    1. alone 10 May 2020 13: 04 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      Quote: Walrus Fang
      Although the West may create a more serious provocation .. I hope they have direct phones on the General Staff.?

      It has been going on for almost 70 years ... Yes, of course they will calm down .. not the first time
      1. AUL
        AUL 10 May 2020 13: 29 New
        • 2
        • 1
        +1
        Again, someone was the first to return fire ... Here are just a showdown between the nuclear powers now and not enough!
    2. Astra wild 10 May 2020 14: 07 New
      • 4
      • 1
      +3
      In fact, Pakistan and India are one nation, but their religion has split.
      1. To be or not to be 10 May 2020 14: 34 New
        • 7
        • 3
        +4
        Quote: Astra wild
        In fact, Pakistan and India are one nation, but their religion has split.

        Is religion? or there were storytellers beyond the hill. using the religious factor?
        1. abvgdeika 10 May 2020 16: 03 New
          • 1
          • 4
          -3
          Definitely, these are the machinations of imperialism. am
        2. Zeev Zeev 10 May 2020 19: 41 New
          • 1
          • 3
          -2
          Foreign splitters actually created India from hundreds of independent principalities and dozens of different peoples with different cultures, religions, languages. But it was divided into Pakistan, India and East Pakistan (Bangladesh) on its own.
          1. demiurg 11 May 2020 05: 45 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            What are you saying?
            And forgive the Mongols in the 12th century, fought in the Indus Valley?
            The fact that the borders have changed repeatedly since then, I believe. Well, so in Europe there is Poland mocking about the borders of the 16th century from Mozh to Mozh.
            India is a multinational state whose history can be traced back to the Sumerians.
            1. Zeev Zeev 11 May 2020 06: 28 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              That's what I say. In the 12th century, Temujin Esugeevich (better known as Genghis Khan) sent his tumens not to the Indus Valley, but to the Amu Darya Valley. If you are talking about the Mughal empire that arose in the 16th century, then it did not occupy the entire territory of British India (from which the above states arose).
              1. demiurg 11 May 2020 07: 46 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                Okay, I repent, I got it wrong with the dates.
                If you started to find fault with the territories occupied in the 12-16th century and modern, tell us on what basis do people who preach Judaism occupy and genocide the local population in the territory of which Turkey previously owned? The fact that the Jews have a shrine there, do not care. Jerusalem is a holy city for all Abrahamic religions. What right do Jews living in Poland, Russia, or France have in the ghetto to evict people who have lived on this earth since the Sumerians? But how it all began compassionately, do not shoot, we fled from the genocide.

                1. Zeev Zeev 11 May 2020 08: 06 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  There are no “since the Sumerians” here. The vast majority of local Arabs are newcomers from Arab countries of the last 200 (and more than half over the past 100) years. And all who live longer than this period are the Islamized descendants of the Jews and Samaritans.
                  Now about genocide and occupation. Occupation is when one country occupies the territory of another. Which country was occupied by Israel?
                  Genocide is when there is a targeted destruction of some ethnic or religious group. For example - the mass killings of ISIS Yezidis (banned in Russia).
                  The result of genocide is a sharp decrease in this group in general or in this territory. Attention question. How many Arabs were on Mandatory Palestine in 1920, when part of the Ottoman Empire was transferred under the control of the British Empire to (quote) "create a Jewish national home," and how many are there now?
                  1. demiurg 11 May 2020 08: 14 New
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    0
                    Good believe. 200 years is not a term. Then 2-3-4-5 Aliya is it all come in large numbers?
                    I still did not understand why the Polish Jews who fought in England and France occupy the territory of the Islamic state. Why do these people ignore UN resolution No. 181?
                    Show with numbers that Muslims under occupation breed better than in the same Syria or Egypt.
                    1. Zeev Zeev 11 May 2020 08: 45 New
                      • 0
                      • 0
                      0
                      1-2-3-4-5 Aliya is returning to her homeland. And the territory of which Islamic state are we occupying here? The Ottoman Empire ceased to exist in 1918.
                      As for resolution 181 of the UN General Assembly. Can you first find out what kind of resolution it is, what its legal force is, and what conditions are necessary for its entry into force?
                      1. demiurg 11 May 2020 16: 29 New
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        0
                        Which homeland? What do Polish Jews have to do with ancient Israel?
                      2. Zeev Zeev 11 May 2020 16: 49 New
                        • 1
                        • 0
                        +1
                        Polish, Belarusian, Yemeni, Romanian, Moroccan, Czech, Iraqi, Turkish and even Russian Jews are directly related to ancient Israel. Direct historical, cultural, religious, linguistic, etc. attitude.
    3. pv1005 10 May 2020 17: 23 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: Astra wild
      In fact, Pakistan and India are one nation, but their religion has split.

      One people? Yes there, that there is a "tribe" on a "tribe".
    4. SSR
      SSR 10 May 2020 22: 00 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      Quote: Astra wild
      In fact, Pakistan and India are one nation, but their religion has split.

      In general, the comrade, they were split by the Anglo-Saxons as BV and APR, the most parasitic nation, they drew borders as they wanted, they did and did not care about geography and ethnicity.
  2. Yurahip 10 May 2020 15: 14 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    Krsaaasavtsy !!! Straight young cockerels!
  • Astra wild 10 May 2020 13: 19 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    If it were the “powers” ​​of the Upper Volta or Swaziland level, I would not have paid attention, but Pakistan and India have nuclear weapons. Of course, they’re not going to throw nuclear weapons right now, but I’m not pleased to realize that at any moment you can start nuclear weapons
    1. Barmaleyka 10 May 2020 13: 31 New
      • 3
      • 4
      -1
      well, they are throwing on the other side of the Pamirs, I don’t think that their arsenal is absolutely sky-high in volume
      1. Astra wild 10 May 2020 15: 04 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Hope you just joked. Whatever arsenals they have, but not the wine people will perish. I'm not talking about the environment. Remember what Chernobyl did, and they have enough charges for 5-6 Chernobyl there.
        If you saw what mutants are born after. I once saw and always lasted
        1. Barmaleyka 10 May 2020 15: 08 New
          • 1
          • 3
          -2
          Quote: Astra wild
          Whatever arsenals they have, but not the wine people will perish.

          fair?
          I don’t give a damn about them as they do about us, although I die, forward and with a song
        2. Sergey Averchenkov 10 May 2020 20: 22 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Innocents always die, where have you seen differently? Ecology in the war? Are you laughing In short, your experiences are stupid. There will be war, there will be casualties in the midst of peace, there will be mutants and much more - this is war.
        3. demiurg 11 May 2020 05: 53 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          In Chernobyl in the 4th block there were about 200 tons of uranium. Kuzkina’s mother, 200 megatons is just 15-17 tons of fissile material. Only the USA and the Russian Federation have more than 200 tons of uranium in warheads, possibly China, but not very possible. India and Pakistan have approximately 100 charges, each with approximately 50-75kg of fissile material.
    2. abvgdeika 10 May 2020 16: 05 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Here also in the world belong to Russia !!!!
  • Thrifty 10 May 2020 13: 20 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    The lack of common sense, and the desire to live peacefully with neighbors is at hand for anyone, but not for the population of these countries, which used to be one country.
    1. abvgdeika 10 May 2020 16: 06 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      India !!!!!
  • Barmaleyka 10 May 2020 13: 29 New
    • 3
    • 3
    0
    to be honest, then at least they’ll kill each other’s friend completely
  • Mountain shooter 10 May 2020 13: 32 New
    • 2
    • 3
    -1
    An endless story ... So they will, try each other "on the tooth" ... Given the presence of nuclear weapons on both sides, skirmishes on the border will not give absolutely any result ... A decisive advantage of one of the sides will lead to the go-ahead with a nuclear baton .. . with a predictable result.
  • Valery Valery 10 May 2020 13: 44 New
    • 7
    • 4
    +3
    Pakistanis and Indians kill each other, but their blood is in the hands of the Queen of England
    1. abvgdeika 10 May 2020 16: 08 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Iron logic wassat
  • Ravil_Asnafovich 10 May 2020 13: 45 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Before that, there was a shootout between Tajiks and Kyrgyz; they can also divide the border, badly, very badly.
  • Ravil_Asnafovich 10 May 2020 13: 48 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Kalashnikovs are armed.
    1. abvgdeika 10 May 2020 16: 09 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      What money was enough, se la vie laughing
      1. Astra wild 10 May 2020 20: 46 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Rather, common sense: it is better to buy cheaper, but more reliable than expensive, but moody. The husband said that the M-16 is well made, but capricious and requires tenderness + more
  • Lord of the Sith 10 May 2020 14: 35 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Camouflage turban, this is clowning laughing
  • Astra wild 10 May 2020 15: 11 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: To be or not to be
    Quote: Astra wild
    In fact, Pakistan and India are one nation, but their religion has split.

    Is religion? or there were storytellers beyond the hill. using the religious factor?

    Rather, someone takes advantage of the existing split
  • Astra wild 10 May 2020 15: 17 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: Barmaleyka
    Quote: Astra wild
    Whatever arsenals they have, but not the wine people will perish.

    fair?
    I don’t give a damn about them as they do about us, although I die, forward and with a song

    If it is violet to you that women and children will die, then think about the environment. Our ecosystem is very vulnerable
  • knn54 10 May 2020 15: 38 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    When India and Pakistan, the so-called principalities, were formed in 1947, or rather, the Rajas, they were given the opportunity to choose which country to join. The religious factor turned out to be important. In Jammu and Kashmir, the majority of the population was Muslim, but its head, Hari Singh, was a Hindu.
    1. Andrey Vasilievich 10 May 2020 17: 14 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: knn54
      When India and Pakistan, the so-called principalities, were formed in 1947, or rather, the Rajas, they were given the opportunity to choose which country to join. The religious factor turned out to be important. In Jammu and Kashmir, the majority of the population was Muslim, but its head, Hari Singh, was a Hindu.

      His last name indicates that he was a Sikh
  • abvgdeika 10 May 2020 16: 01 New
    • 0
    • 3
    -3
    Are you for red or for white soldier ?
  • Pandiurin 10 May 2020 18: 52 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    It seemed (not from this news) that the Indians consider themselves militarily, without taking into account nuclear weapons, much cooler than the Pakistanis. Therefore, they implement a more aggressive version of the confrontation. Pakistan is more restrained, i.e. there is an answer from him, but just to maintain parity, but carefully so as not to exceed some trait. If there are any provocations from Pakistan then mediated through third parties. Hindus, however, do not hesitate to use the armed forces against the armed forces of Pakistan.
    For such an explosive region is very irresponsible.
    1. Astra wild 10 May 2020 20: 57 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Perhaps you are right: Pakistanis are more restrained. What explains this, I do not know. Perhaps the Indians have some deep antipathies: there was Great India, but there were destroyers, etc.?
  • Astra wild 10 May 2020 20: 49 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: Sergey Averchenkov
    Innocents always die, where have you seen differently? Ecology in the war? Are you laughing In short, your experiences are stupid. There will be war, there will be casualties in the midst of peace, there will be mutants and much more - this is war.

    So you are for the war and the destruction of the environment ?!
  • Zomanus 11 May 2020 06: 33 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Yes, they are constantly chopped there. Now one or two weeks and again everything will calm down.