Myths about the war: "Hitler fought only with Bolshevism"

27
Myths about the war: "Hitler fought only with Bolshevism"

One of the myths actively planted today is related to the fact that Adolf Hitler set as his goal not the enslavement and destruction of individual peoples, but the fight against Bolshevism. This statement itself initially looks absurd, if only because the genocide of Jews and Gypsies was started before the moment when the Nazis invaded the territory of the Soviet Union. But those who are engaged in the creation of myths, in many ways even trying to “justify” the invasion war begun by the Third Reich, do not care about this fact.

A typical example of this myth: “If you had lost then, today you would have been drinking Bavarian beer.”



Moreover, this propaganda has an Achilles heel. She is trying to ignore the existence of the Hitler master plan “Ost”, which describes with incredible pedantry everything that was prepared for the peoples of the Soviet Union in the event of the defeat of our country in the war.

The drafters of this plan indicated which part of the population of Russia should be used as actual slaves, which part was exterminated, and to which Soviet territories the “true Aryans” should be resettled.

The Nazis compiled a real barbarian bookkeeping, where each Reichsmark was prescribed - in order to translate that very “Ost” master plan into reality. But in the world there was a force that turned all these plans into dust. This power became the Soviet people - the victorious people.

Video on the 75th anniversary of the Victory from the Russian Ministry of Defense “Cannibal Plan for the Arrangement of the East”:
27 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +14
    8 May 2020 14: 58
    Hitler demanded new lands for Germany and "living space" for the Germans. And he named specifically the lands of Russia, and not someone else. And Bolshevism was only a pretext.
    1. +7
      8 May 2020 15: 17
      Not a pretext, but a screen.
    2. +2
      9 May 2020 01: 45
      Pavel73 (Paul)
      Hitler demanded new lands for Germany and "living space" for the Germans. And he named specifically the lands of Russia, and not someone else. And Bolshevism was only a pretext.
      I suppose you are a little naive if you think that Hitler himself decided something. Hitler was at the top of the world’s capital, which wanted the resources of the USSR, so that Hitler had no other choice but to attack Russia, it was not for that that the bull was fed.
      1. +1
        9 May 2020 07: 40
        Right. Only between European, English and American capital is there a difference. Europe needed Hitler to win (and then all who helped him would get their piece from Russia. That is why Europe didn’t particularly resist Hitler, with the exception of Yugoslavia). England needed Russia to win (otherwise it would be the next victim). The United States was all the same who would win, the main thing is that no one won as long as possible.
  2. +10
    8 May 2020 15: 01
    but the fight against Bolshevism
    And for this, dozens of concentration camps were built, where they were "accepted" only with party membership cards! What nonsense! How much can you talk about this topic!
    1. +10
      8 May 2020 15: 55
      Europa does not stop trying to launder Nazism. For all of them were snooping, Someone fought in the SS against the Union, someone guarded the camps and engaged in mass killings, and most of them strengthened the military and economic power of the Reich in their area. What was well noted by the Czechs, and by the way the French, too, and others.
      1. +1
        9 May 2020 15: 13
        Quote: Cyril G ...
        Europa does not stop trying to launder Nazism. For all of them were snooping, Someone fought in the SS against the Union, someone guarded the camps and engaged in mass killings, and most of them strengthened the military and economic power of the Reich in their area. What was well noted by the Czechs, and by the way the French, too, and others.

        But there are rare voices of reason - so on the eve the German Foreign Minister published an article almost in Spiegel that only Nazi Germany was guilty of the war and blaming others was fatal, since German history itself proves the danger of revenge.
        1. +2
          9 May 2020 15: 17
          But alas, part of the East European mongrels and former Soviet republics are eager to curry favor with the hegemon in an attempt to piss off Russia, and therefore pretty play with the rehabilitation of Nazism ....
          1. +2
            9 May 2020 15: 35
            Quote: Cyril G ...
            But alas, part of the East European mongrels and former Soviet republics are eager to curry favor with the hegemon in an attempt to piss off Russia, and therefore pretty play with the rehabilitation of Nazism ....

            Unfortunately, this, in my opinion, is not just a desire to lick the hegemon, but also alarming bells - in Eastern Europe, their own Nazi movements are gradually emerging, and in some places they have already taken shape ...
    2. +5
      8 May 2020 16: 02
      The drafters of this plan indicated which part of the population of Russia should be used as actual slaves, which part was exterminated, and to which Soviet territories the “true Aryans” should be resettled.

      And now what is happening .. the same plan "Ost", only a side view ..
  3. +11
    8 May 2020 15: 07
    All the enemies of our country and people, who have inflicted enormous material and human damage on our country and people during these 100 years after the October Revolution, have always covered up and cover up their crimes by "fighting Bolshevism-communism", "saving" our country and people from "Bolshevism - communism ", slandering the Bolshevik communists.
    1. +2
      8 May 2020 17: 50
      Prior to this, liberation from royal oppression. They do not change.
  4. +10
    8 May 2020 15: 15
    Hitler and Krasnov fought against Bolshevism, but it’s not clear why Krasnov’s monument is erected in Russia like the rest of the fighters, but not Hitler ... laughing
    1. 0
      8 May 2020 15: 19
      Until they clean the government and parliament from the liberdas, they will erect monuments to the traitors of Russia and not only to traitors, but also to enemies. Liberda she is: Russophobic.
    2. +10
      8 May 2020 16: 28
      Hitler fought against the Russians as a nation. If the Russian emperor or president were at the head of the country, nothing would have changed. The West climbed into Russia at all times, regardless of the form of its rule.
  5. -1
    8 May 2020 15: 32
    So there was no Holocaust?
    1. +1
      8 May 2020 17: 29
      And why would the general / lieutenant "minus", were all the Jews really communists ???
  6. 0
    8 May 2020 15: 36
    Hitler just did not seek to fight only against Bolshevism. If he fought only with Bolshevism, the result of the war could be different
  7. +1
    8 May 2020 15: 38
    A typical example of this myth: “If you had lost then, today you would have been drinking Bavarian beer.”
    this is not a myth, but nonsense, which was immediately refuted, and the author was mixed with crap, 10 years have passed since then. And stupid cheers-propagandists drag and drag this nonsense, they called it a myth ...
    1. +1
      8 May 2020 17: 20
      and the author
      And who, by the way, is the author?
      1. +4
        8 May 2020 17: 44
        IMHO, the phrase Goizman quail, followed by our narrow-minded cheers-propagandists.
        “We agreed to the point that the victory over Hitler seems to be of no use to us:“ If we lost the war, we would now drink Bavarian beer. ”No. Gentlemen, if we lost the war, now you would be drinking slop and collecting scraps from the master's table, as befits a slave. " G. Chukhrai.
  8. +3
    8 May 2020 15: 54
    I wanted to see, I just heard this voice, this voice voiced, the series as criminals destroyed those who fought against the Nazis. ................ die !!!!
  9. +2
    8 May 2020 18: 15
    Well, yes, I crushed all the geyrops for myself, but there were so many Bolsheviks !!! Passion is so much shorter.
    Another b / p / unit .... nothing new, in short.
  10. +5
    8 May 2020 18: 32
    The Germans, having occupied a particular locality, sought and destroyed not only Jews, but also communists. The whole of humanity. including the current Russian authorities, mourn for the innocent dead Jews. But I have never heard that anyone, including our authorities, condemn the extermination of people as communists. Why? I’ll try to explain. In Babi Yar, Ukrainian policemen drove and killed not only Jews, but also identified Communists, whom communist neighbors indicated in Kiev. But no one ever regretted the Communists.
  11. +4
    8 May 2020 21: 23
    I must say that the seeds of fascism were all over the world at that time. Therefore, Hitler needed such a sign as the fight against Bolshevism. Some countries, like France, had nothing in common with the USSR. However, this did not stop Hitler from occupying them. They didn’t even come to Africa in order to free the peoples of this continent from colonialism. Fascism sprouts from nationalism, chauvinism, and from declaring its people superior over the rest. It is dressed in different clothes.
    1. 0
      9 May 2020 01: 19
      Hitler didn’t touch France at all; she declared war on him.
  12. 0
    5 June 2020 18: 56
    Behind every politician are the interests of various political, financial and ethnic groups. And depending on their capacity financially, they solve their problems.