The launching of the Khabarovsk nuclear submarine is planned for late June

The launching of the Khabarovsk nuclear submarine is planned for late June

The standard carrier of Poseidon unmanned aerial vehicles - the Khabarovsk nuclear submarine of project 09851, will be launched, most likely, at the end of June this year, there is no exact date to date. This was reported by TASS with reference to a source in the military-industrial complex.


Khabarovsk will be launched the earliest at the end of June. No exact date yet

- the agency leads the words of the source.

Earlier other news Agency - RIA Novosti - with reference to its own source, reported that Khabarovsk will be launched at the end of May this year. After the descent, the submarine will be completed afloat, after which the carrier of the Poseidons will go for trials, which will take at least two years. It was clarified that there were no official comments on the submarine either from the Navy or from shipbuilders.

It should be noted that the Khabarovsk nuclear submarine will be a regular carrier of underwater uninhabited vehicles and, according to unconfirmed reports, will be able to carry at least six Poseidons on board. At the same time, the Belgorod multipurpose nuclear submarine of Project 949A Antei, specially converted to Poseidons and launched on April 23, 2019, will be an experimental carrier.

The Khabarovsk project was developed at the Rubin Central Design Bureau (TsKB), the submarine itself was laid down at Sevmash in July 2014. The technical details of the project are not reported.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

41 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. knn54 7 May 2020 12: 24 New
    • 9
    • 15
    -6
    And when will the Poseidons appear? Or is it unclear for two years what to experience?
    1. Sky strike fighter 7 May 2020 13: 23 New
      • 6
      • 4
      +2
      For two years, the submarines themselves will experience. Poseidon has long been tested.
      in November last in Russia, the 11th test of the Poseidon underwater drone was carried out, which is capable of operating in a fully autonomous mode and has an unlimited range. As you know, only the lazy does not speak about Poseidon today. The tactical and technical data of the underwater drone, of course, are not known to anyone.


      Moreover, in February of this year Minister of Defense of the Russian Federation Army General Sergei Shoigu said that the sea tests of the Poseidon unmanned aerial vehicle were successfully completed. However, he also said that "the personnel of the Poseidon carrier submarine have been trained.
      According to the open press, it is believed that the carriers of the Poseidons may be the Belgorod project 09852 and Khabarovsk project 09851 nuclear submarines (nuclear submarines) under construction or modernization.

      http://www.ng.ru/columnist/2019-03-26/100_190326columnist.html
      1. Aag
        Aag 7 May 2020 15: 27 New
        • 3
        • 6
        -3
        Carriers of the all-planetary "northern animal"?)))
        We can’t crush, let's scare!
  2. Mavrikiy 7 May 2020 12: 32 New
    • 3
    • 5
    -2
    at the end of June this year, there is no exact date to date.
    June is good. And who asked the exact date? requestStupidly.
  3. Krasnoyarsk 7 May 2020 13: 27 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    Good news. Though it’s not such news.
    All the same, since the medium is being prepared, it’s already the second one, whatever one may say, there will be Poseidon.
    It is gratifying.
    1. abvgdeika 7 May 2020 13: 42 New
      • 4
      • 6
      -2
      But it is not exactly !!!!!!!
      1. Sky strike fighter 7 May 2020 14: 00 New
        • 3
        • 3
        0
        Quote: abvgdeika
        But it is not exactly !!!!!!!

        What is not accurate? The Belgorod nuclear submarine will become the carrier of rescue deep-sea and autonomous uninhabited underwater vehicles. Poseidon also refers to this. The nuclear submarine Khabarovsk is also the carrier of Poseidon, but the projects are different and their tasks are also different.

        , in March 2013, Izvestia, referring to a source at the headquarters of the Navy, revealed plans for the military department to build a sonar watch boat capable of detecting objects at a distance of up to 600 km. According to the publication, it was assumed that the construction of a special nuclear submarine would be entrusted to Sevmash, although the option of refitting an existing boat at the Zvezdochka ship repair center was considered.

        We add that in April 2014, Sevmash signed a contract with the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, according to which it handed over to Malakhit and Rubin design bureaus the task of developing the design of the experimental parts under the code Severomorets. In the tender documentation (1 and 2), according to the type of activity, these works are classified as “shipbuilding”.

        Earlier, in 2012, the Belgorod nuclear-powered research submarine was launched at Sevmash. And if Khabarovsk will be built under project 09851, the Belgorod nuclear submarine laid two years earlier will become the sole representative of project 09852. As the Central Naval Portal has already reported, the research submarine will be created to carry out complex tasks: conducting diverse scientific research in remote areas of the oceans, participating in search and rescue operations. In addition, the nuclear submarine should ensure the installation of underwater equipment and their inspection, testing of new types of research equipment, monitoring of underwater transportation routes. The submarine will be the carrier of rescue deep-sea and autonomous uninhabited underwater vehicles.

        https://flotprom.ru/news/index.php?ELEMENT_ID=169683
    2. Cyril G ... 7 May 2020 14: 00 New
      • 2
      • 7
      -5
      Although neither news nor good.
  4. abvgdeika 7 May 2020 13: 41 New
    • 1
    • 9
    -8
    The main thing is not to the bottom soldier
  5. Cyril G ... 7 May 2020 14: 00 New
    • 6
    • 9
    -3
    Non-traditional people, APKR pr.949, which had to be completed as a carrier of the Kyrgyz Republic Caliber, were killed. I'm talking about Belgorod. There would be a couple of orders of magnitude more. In fact, the idea is that two unique submarines (with an equally unique acoustic portrait) should become carriers of giganticpedas as wretched as those who proposed this, uh, unconventionally minded.
    - In the form in which Poseidon is declared - a weapon of deferred retribution, he has the right to life in exactly one version. If it is transported on a tanker, if it can be launched and sent on the last journey from any pier where a truck crane can call. That bish at the height of TMV. Otherwise, this is nonsense and absurdity.
    1. Sky strike fighter 7 May 2020 14: 18 New
      • 7
      • 6
      +1
      All the same, people of non-traditional orientation, APKR pr.949, who had to be completed as a carrier of the Kyrgyz Republic Caliber, were killed. I'm talking about Belgorod. There would be a couple of orders of magnitude more.

      Well, the Navy of the Russian Federation probably knows better what’s more useful. The construction units 949A are already planning to rearm on Onyx and Caliber. In the non-nuclear version, Poseidon is able to hit AUG more effectively than RCC Granite.

      in April, the Sevmash plant in Severodvinsk hosted the official launch ceremony of the first experimental multipurpose nuclear submarine Belgorod, which carries the Poseidon submarine nuclear drones. The boat belongs to Project 949A Antey (an analogue of Kursk), which was specially redesigned for such drones.
      Recall that the development of Poseidon by Russian President Vladimir Putin was first announced in a message to the Federal Assembly in 2018. He said then that such drones could be equipped with both conventional and nuclear munitions, which would allow them to hit a wide range of targets, including aircraft carrier strike groups, as well as coastal fortifications and infrastructure.
      The performance characteristics of the project submarine 09851 Khabarovsk have not been officially disclosed. According to data from open sources, the displacement of nuclear submarines is about 10 thousand tons, speed - 30−32 knots, depth of immersion - 500 meters, autonomy - up to 120 days, crew - at least 100 people.

      https://eadaily.com/ru/news/2020/04/23/perspektivy-noveyshey-apl-habarovsk-s-yadernym-dronom-poseydon-eksperty
      1. Boa kaa 7 May 2020 14: 42 New
        • 5
        • 2
        +3
        Quote: Sky Strike fighter
        In the non-nuclear version, Poseidon is able to hit AUG more effectively than RCC Granite.

        This machine in a non-nuclear version is not planned for use. Talk about "ordinary equipment" is the essence of a verbal smoke screen, so as not to shock the American public, as you can’t drown one, even such a “torpedo” as Poseidon, of the Nimitz or D. Ford class AVU. In addition, such a T-doy also needs to get into it., Without any "radius of destruction" there. And it’s not so easy from the salvo range that this wunderwaffle expects.
        1. Sky strike fighter 7 May 2020 14: 56 New
          • 3
          • 8
          -5
          This machine in a non-nuclear version is not planned for use.

          It is planned. Options with a conventional warhead and with a special warhead.
          you can’t drown one, even such a “torpedo” as Poseidon, of the Nimitz or D. Ford class AVU.

          Your aircraft carriers are directly unkillable. And if Poseidon has a non-nuclear version, about 5 tons of explosives are permissible?
          such a t-doy also needs to get into it., without any "radius of destruction" there.

          Do you think they will adopt a product that cannot be hit by an aircraft carrier?
          1. Cyril G ... 7 May 2020 15: 05 New
            • 1
            • 1
            0
            Omeriganians will fasten the tripwire on aircraft carriers
            1. Sky strike fighter 7 May 2020 15: 07 New
              • 1
              • 1
              0
              Quote: Cyril G ...
              Omeriganians will fasten the tripwire on aircraft carriers

              What is that?
              1. Cyril G ... 7 May 2020 15: 09 New
                • 3
                • 1
                +2
                Their Package-NK
                1. Sky strike fighter 7 May 2020 15: 11 New
                  • 3
                  • 2
                  +1
                  Do you think it will help a lot?
                  1. Cyril G ... 7 May 2020 15: 13 New
                    • 4
                    • 1
                    +3
                    If without SWAP, then clap and all. But Poseidon, in principle, is not for this. It is against ports and coastal cities. That is, only against stationary objects. Well, some kind of security system will be in case of an attempted attack, such as the work of the search sonar torpedoes in the asset. Then, as an option, undermining
                    1. Sky strike fighter 7 May 2020 15: 19 New
                      • 1
                      • 4
                      -3
                      If without SWAP, then clap and all.

                      How simple it is for you.
                      1. Cyril G ... 7 May 2020 15: 26 New
                        • 7
                        • 3
                        +4
                        If you have a clue about what, at least as part of the BSF (Fleet’s combat facilities) course, then it’s much easier. Gigatorpeda was offered for the first time back in the early 80s. And every time sober realists shoved her back. But now finally a pusher was found in higher spheres and decided to cut the loot on this nonsense. Eventually MINUS 2 APL. For me it’s a deserving act. The supreme measure of social protection.
                        - By the way, how you decided to shoot at the AUG torpedo is interesting to me. Gigatorpeda how will it be induced?
                      2. Sky strike fighter 7 May 2020 15: 38 New
                        • 3
                        • 6
                        -3
                        Gigatorpeda was offered for the first time back in the early 80s. And every time sober realists shoved her back.

                        And in vain. At a depth of 1 km in the oceans it is almost impossible to find, just like finding a needle in a haystack. It is much more promising than ICBMs. It’s just that at that time there was still no suitable technology and did not bother. We have now finished thinking.
                        As a result, MINUS 2 nuclear submarines.

                        Nothing. Soon they will lay 2 MAPL Ash-M.
                        By the way, how you decided to shoot at the AUG torpedo is interesting to me. Gigatorpeda how will it be induced?

                        Who will tell you such information? You can search the Internet. What should be.
                      3. Cyril G ... 7 May 2020 15: 46 New
                        • 6
                        • 3
                        +3
                        According to claim 1, at such depths the PZKs lie quite to themselves, therefore, a torpedo can theoretically be heard over thousands of kilometers, and for the declared speed it is real. A torpedo is either a weapon of the first silent strike, or some kind of nonsense from a military point of view. Further, a torpedo is a waste of money in any situation and can not be compared with a rocket. And finally, the issue is not engineering technology. Now there was just a pusher for a small share. I hope that we will soon find out who is who. By the way, SOSUS and the rich experience of opposing submarines in the Anglo-Saxons have not gone away
                        According to claim 2 - Minus 2 MAPL did not disappear. PLA is needed here and now and not in 10 years. Ask how many live multi-purpose people we have - IMHO 5 + 1 + 3 + 2 = 11-12 units. At the same time, how many submarines are in the USA, France and England.
                        According to claim 3. 2 + 2 I can quite add, tea is not Newton’s bin.
                      4. Sky strike fighter 7 May 2020 15: 59 New
                        • 3
                        • 5
                        -2
                        Ask how many live multi-purpose people we have - IMHO 5 + 1 + 3 + 2 = 11-12 units.

                        There will be more.
                        The naval composition of the Russian Navy (warships of the main classes) on 01.05.2020/XNUMX/XNUMX
                        https://navy-korabel.livejournal.com/237144.html
                        At the same time, how many submarines are in the USA, France and England.

                        So they didn’t have a disaster and the 90s. You would still have submarines of all NATO countries.
                        At such depths, PZKs are completely lying, therefore, a torpedo can theoretically be heard over thousands of kilometers

                        Funny about the theory.
                        By the way, SOSUS and the rich experience of opposing submarines in the Anglo-Saxons have not gone away

                        Its capabilities are very limited.
                      5. Cyril G ... 7 May 2020 17: 03 New
                        • 4
                        • 3
                        +1
                        I'm definitely funny. About PZK did not hear.
                        SOSUS is mothballed. There will be a real threat, re-preserve and change campus. The roaring Poseidon will surely be heard. In silent mode, 4-6 knots will crawl to America for months. What the hell do you need this weapon for?

                        And do not drag Shishkin. I counted boats in the ranks. Do you understand the difference? Total! and in service, combat ready! and?
                    2. Sky strike fighter 7 May 2020 16: 29 New
                      • 2
                      • 2
                      0
                      By the way, SOSUS and the rich experience of opposing submarines in the Anglo-Saxons have not gone away

                      In my opinion, they rejected SOSUS. It became not effective.
                      As a result, of all the BSAS operating in the 80s, only four were left in their original form.
                      Despite the positive experience of using the SOSUS system, it also had drawbacks, one of which was mentioned above, high cost, another drawback is cumbersome and not agility i.e. In order to organize monitoring of underwater objects in a new area, it is necessary to carry out lengthy work on installing this system and organizing its connection with the BGAS post each time. But the main drawback was that the detection and classification of modern nuclear submarines with a noise of Psh = 0,05 Pa using BGAS became problematic even when it was in close proximity to the receiving antenna, i.e. BGAS "Agam" has ceased to meet the requirements of the tactical and technical specifications for the detection of underwater and surface objects and practically does not fulfill its initial functions.
                      Therefore, there was a need to develop an underwater surveillance system that could quickly and covertly deploy in areas of crisis and solve a range of anti-aircraft missions in the interests of the US forces and their allies operating there.
                      To create such a system, it was necessary to abandon stationary passive noise-sensing systems (such as SOSUS) in favor of active passive hydroacoustic lighting systems for underwater rapid deployment.
                      What are such systems? A group of emitters placed in the sea in advance (installed either at the bottom, or at a given depth, or towed) sends acoustic signals according to a given program in the set frequency ranges and time intervals. These signals are received by a whole network of pre-deployed special antennas (they can be placed on submarines, surface ships, systems of discharged radio-acoustic buoys, antenna arrays located at the bottom, etc.). This group works as one giant sonar device, which allows to obtain the coordinates of the target system that has come into the zone of responsibility in the shortest possible time using echo signals. From the command post, information about the target is transmitted via space communications to the command post of the united operational formation. Thus, the location of even the most modern and low-noise submarine can be immediately established - and its destruction is extremely simplified.
                      Actually, the deployment of elements of active-passive sonar systems can occur from a variety of carriers - submarines (using uninhabited automatic submarines based on the mother submarine, as well as light divers), surface ships, planes and helicopters.

                      https://flot.com/blog/katastrofa/43879.php
                  2. Charik 7 May 2020 17: 07 New
                    • 1
                    • 2
                    -1
                    955A construction began in 2012, only in June 2020, as usual they promise to surrender to the fleet, 8 YEARS !!!!, we are waiting for the next Ash-tree to the year 30-35m.
                  3. Sky strike fighter 7 May 2020 17: 13 New
                    • 3
                    • 3
                    0
                    The head submarine of project 955A. So far, everyone has worked. On Yasen-M. Kazan and Novosibirsk may at the end of this year surrender to the fleet under favorable circumstances.
                  4. Charik 7 May 2020 17: 18 New
                    • 1
                    • 2
                    -1
                    Even with Kazan, nothing is clear, so it's too early to think about Novosibirsk
  • Aag
    Aag 7 May 2020 15: 33 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    There is probably a difference between pre-emitting known targets (with route options) and maneuvering?
  • ROSS_51 7 May 2020 16: 20 New
    • 1
    • 3
    -2
    Quote: BoA KAA
    Quote: Sky Strike fighter
    In the non-nuclear version, Poseidon is able to hit AUG more effectively than RCC Granite.

    This machine in a non-nuclear version is not planned for use. Talk about "ordinary equipment" is the essence of a verbal smoke screen, so as not to shock the American public, as you can’t drown one, even such a “torpedo” as Poseidon, of the Nimitz or D. Ford class AVU. In addition, such a T-doy also needs to get into it., Without any "radius of destruction" there. And it’s not so easy from the salvo range that this wunderwaffle expects.

    And why get into an aircraft carrier with an underwater nuclear drone of increased power? When this is triggered at the bottom, for example, there the whole AUG can be painted over with black. Or just a naval base.
    1. Ryaruav 7 May 2020 17: 12 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      paint over with black, it depends on the depth and range of detonation once again review the tests on a bikini, not everything is so simple
  • NEXUS 8 May 2020 09: 43 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: BoA KAA
    because you can’t drown one, even such a “torpedo” as Poseidon, of the Nimitz or D. Ford class AVU.

    Sasha welcome!
    Well, with a head full of sex megatons, all the AUG in a row, then Poseidon will turn into very radioactive and lifeless scrap metal. Well, something will send to the bottom. Operation Crossroads ... remember?
  • Cyril G ... 7 May 2020 14: 50 New
    • 4
    • 5
    -1
    In the Navy, or rather in the naval elite, they don’t know what is more useless, but they know who will give the most. We have multi-purpose submarines full out. You can say the verge of disaster. As a result, minus 2 multipurpose nuclear submarines. Not a damn thing.
    In the non-nuclear version, Poseidon is simply nonsense. In nuclear versus AUG, too.
  • Interlocutor 7 May 2020 15: 02 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    The essence of the moment is that the presence of such weapons in one, or even better in several copies, stops all adequate adversaries by 101 percent. Inadequate, as a rule, are simply driven with brooms. For they have no weapons capable of harming. Therefore, it is necessary, necessary, and once again it is necessary to make such a weapon.
    1. Aag
      Aag 7 May 2020 15: 35 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Or say that it is being done ...
  • SVM
    SVM 7 May 2020 14: 48 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    the submarine itself was laid at Sevmash in July 2014. Technical details of the project are not reported.

    So keep quiet about the entry date .. It would be better for such an infa, for treason, they reproached the Motherland for a long time .. Che chat!
  • flicker 7 May 2020 15: 59 New
    • 0
    • 6
    -6
    after which the Poseidon carrier will go for tests
    somewhere off the coast of the USA.
    And only after the USA is washed away, the tests can be recognized as successful. laughing
    1. SovAr238A 7 May 2020 19: 31 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      Quote: flicker
      after which the Poseidon carrier will go for tests
      somewhere off the coast of the USA.
      And only after the USA is washed away, the tests can be recognized as successful. laughing

      And if you wash Kamchatka or Sakhalin? Then you are the first out of habit, say: "And then why us?"
      1. flicker 8 May 2020 10: 30 New
        • 0
        • 1
        -1
        And if you wash Kamchatka or Sakhalin?
        if Israel is washed away, then
        according to the khozlyatsky habit you will say: "And then what for us?"
  • for
    for 7 May 2020 16: 53 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Better not plan, go down and show the descent report.
  • Old26 8 May 2020 12: 09 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Quote: flicker
    after which the Poseidon carrier will go for tests
    somewhere off the coast of the USA.
    And only after the USA is washed away, the tests can be recognized as successful. laughing

    I am afraid, dear, there will be no one to recognize, since the territory of Russia will become a radioactive desert. You are our peacemaker ...