The launching of the Khabarovsk nuclear submarine is planned for late June

The standard carrier of Poseidon unmanned aerial vehicles - the Khabarovsk nuclear submarine of project 09851, will be launched, most likely, at the end of June this year, there is no exact date to date. This was reported by TASS with reference to a source in the military-industrial complex.

Khabarovsk will be launched the earliest at the end of June. No exact date yet

- the agency leads the words of the source.

Earlier other news Agency - RIA Novosti - with reference to its own source, reported that Khabarovsk will be launched at the end of May this year. After the descent, the submarine will be completed afloat, after which the carrier of the Poseidons will go for trials, which will take at least two years. It was clarified that there were no official comments on the submarine either from the Navy or from shipbuilders.

It should be noted that the Khabarovsk nuclear submarine will be a regular carrier of underwater uninhabited vehicles and, according to unconfirmed reports, will be able to carry at least six Poseidons on board. At the same time, the Belgorod multipurpose nuclear submarine of Project 949A Antei, specially converted to Poseidons and launched on April 23, 2019, will be an experimental carrier.

The Khabarovsk project was developed at the Rubin Central Design Bureau (TsKB), the submarine itself was laid down at Sevmash in July 2014. The technical details of the project are not reported.

Comments

[knn54]

And when will "Poseidons" appear? Or it is not clear what to experience for two years?

[Sky strike fighter]

For two years, the submarines themselves will experience. Poseidon has long been tested.

in November last in Russia, the 11th test of the Poseidon underwater drone was carried out, which is capable of operating in a fully autonomous mode and has an unlimited range. As you know, only the lazy does not speak about Poseidon today. The tactical and technical data of the underwater drone, of course, are not known to anyone.

Moreover, in February of this year Minister of Defense of the Russian Federation Army General Sergei Shoigu said that the sea tests of the Poseidon unmanned aerial vehicle were successfully completed. However, he also said that "the personnel of the Poseidon carrier submarine have been trained.
According to the open press, it is believed that the carriers of the Poseidons may be the Belgorod project 09852 and Khabarovsk project 09851 nuclear submarines (nuclear submarines) under construction or modernization.

http://www.ng.ru/columnist/2019-03-26/100_190326columnist.html

[Aag]

Carriers of the planetary "northern animal"?)))
We can’t crush, let's scare!

[Mavrikiy]

at the end of June this year, there is no exact date to date.

June is good. And who asked the exact date? Stupidly.

[Krasnoyarsk]

Good news. Though it’s not such news.
All the same, if a carrier is being prepared, and it is already the second, whatever one may say, then there will be "Poseidon".
It is gratifying.

[abvgdeika]

But it is not exactly !!!!!!!

[Sky strike fighter]

Quote: abvgdeika

But it is not exactly !!!!!!!

What is not accurate? The Belgorod nuclear submarine will become the carrier of rescue deep-sea and autonomous uninhabited underwater vehicles. Poseidon also refers to this. The nuclear submarine Khabarovsk is also the carrier of Poseidon, but the projects are different and their tasks are also different.

, in March 2013, Izvestia, citing a source at the headquarters of the Navy, disclosed the plans of the military department to build a hydroacoustic patrol boat capable of detecting objects at a distance of 600 km. According to the newspaper, it was assumed that the construction of a special nuclear submarine would be entrusted to "Sevmash", although an option was considered to re-equip an already existing boat at the "Zvezdochka" Ship Repair Center.

We add that in April 2014, "Sevmash" signed a contract with the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, according to which it handed over to the design bureaus "Malakhit" and "Rubin" assignments for the development of a draft of the components of the development work under the code "Severomorets". In the tender documents (1 and 2), according to the activity code, these works are classified as "shipbuilding".

Earlier, in 2012, the nuclear research submarine Belgorod was laid down at Sevmash. And, if Khabarovsk is built according to project 09851, then the nuclear submarine Belgorod, which was laid down two years earlier, will become the only representative of project 09852. As the Central Naval Portal has already reported, the research submarine will be created for the implementation of difficult tasks: carrying out diverse scientific research in remote areas of the World Ocean, participation in search and rescue operations. In addition, the nuclear submarine must ensure the installation of underwater equipment and their inspection, testing of new models of research equipment, monitoring of underwater transport routes. The nuclear submarine will be the carrier of deep-sea rescue and autonomous unmanned underwater vehicles.

https://flotprom.ru/news/index.php?ELEMENT_ID=169683

[Cyril G ...]

Although neither news nor good.

[abvgdeika]

The main thing is not to the bottom

[Cyril G ...]

Non-traditional people, APKR pr.949, which had to be completed as a carrier of the Kyrgyz Republic Caliber, were killed. I'm talking about Belgorod. There would be a couple of orders of magnitude more. In fact, the idea is that two unique submarines (with an equally unique acoustic portrait) should become carriers of giganticpedas as wretched as those who proposed this, uh, unconventionally minded.
- In the form in which Poseidon is declared - a weapon of deferred retribution, he has the right to life in exactly one version. If it is transported on a tanker, if it can be launched and sent on the last journey from any pier where a truck crane can call. That bish at the height of TMV. Otherwise, this is nonsense and absurdity.

[Sky strike fighter]

All the same, people of non-traditional orientation, APKR pr.949, who had to be completed as a carrier of the Kyrgyz Republic Caliber, were killed. I'm talking about Belgorod. There would be a couple of orders of magnitude more.

Well, the Navy of the Russian Federation probably knows better what’s more useful. The construction units 949A are already planning to rearm on Onyx and Caliber. In the non-nuclear version, Poseidon is able to hit AUG more effectively than RCC Granite.

in April, the Sevmash plant in Severodvinsk hosted the official launch ceremony of the first experimental multipurpose nuclear submarine Belgorod, which carries the Poseidon submarine nuclear drones. The boat belongs to Project 949A Antey (an analogue of Kursk), which was specially redesigned for such drones.
Recall that the development of Poseidon by Russian President Vladimir Putin was first announced in a message to the Federal Assembly in 2018. He said then that such drones could be equipped with both conventional and nuclear munitions, which would allow them to hit a wide range of targets, including aircraft carrier strike groups, as well as coastal fortifications and infrastructure.
The performance characteristics of the project submarine 09851 Khabarovsk have not been officially disclosed. According to data from open sources, the displacement of nuclear submarines is about 10 thousand tons, speed - 30−32 knots, depth of immersion - 500 meters, autonomy - up to 120 days, crew - at least 100 people.

https://eadaily.com/ru/news/2020/04/23/perspektivy-noveyshey-apl-habarovsk-s-yadernym-dronom-poseydon-eksperty

[Boa kaa]

Quote: Sky Strike fighter

In the non-nuclear version, Poseidon is able to hit AUG more effectively than RCC Granite.

This machine is not planned for use in a non-nuclear version. Talking about "regular equipment" is a verbal smokescreen, so as not to shock the American public too much. one, even such a "torpedo" as Poseidon, Nimitz class AVU or D. Ford cannot be drowned. In addition, such a t-doi also needs to get into it., Without any "radius of defeat" there. And this is not so easy from the range of a volley, which is expected from this prodigy.

[Sky strike fighter]

This machine in a non-nuclear version is not planned for use.

It is planned. Options with a conventional warhead and with a special warhead.

one, even such a "torpedo" as Poseidon, Nimitz class AVU or D. Ford cannot be drowned.

Your aircraft carriers are directly unkillable. And if Poseidon has a non-nuclear version, about 5 tons of explosives are permissible?

such a t-doy you also need to get into it., without any "radius of defeat" there.

Do you think they will adopt a product that cannot be hit by an aircraft carrier?

[Cyril G ...]

Omeriganians will fasten the tripwire on aircraft carriers

[Sky strike fighter]

Quote: Cyril G ...

Omeriganians will fasten the tripwire on aircraft carriers

What is that?

[Cyril G ...]

Their Package-NK

[Sky strike fighter]

Do you think it will help a lot?

[Cyril G ...]

If without SWAP, then clap and all. But Poseidon, in principle, is not for this. It is against ports and coastal cities. That is, only against stationary objects. Well, some kind of security system will be in case of an attempted attack, such as the work of the search sonar torpedoes in the asset. Then, as an option, undermining

[Sky strike fighter]

If without SWAP, then clap and all.

How simple it is for you.

[Cyril G ...]

If you have a clue about what, at least as part of the BSF (Fleet’s combat facilities) course, then it’s much easier. Gigatorpeda was offered for the first time back in the early 80s. And every time sober realists shoved her back. But now finally a pusher was found in higher spheres and decided to cut the loot on this nonsense. Eventually MINUS 2 APL. For me it’s a deserving act. The supreme measure of social protection.
- By the way, how you decided to shoot at the AUG torpedo is interesting to me. Gigatorpeda how will it be induced?

[Sky strike fighter]

Gigatorpeda was offered for the first time back in the early 80s. And every time sober realists shoved her back.

And in vain. At a depth of 1 km in the oceans it is almost impossible to find, just like finding a needle in a haystack. It is much more promising than ICBMs. It’s just that at that time there was still no suitable technology and did not bother. We have now finished thinking.

As a result, MINUS 2 nuclear submarines.

Nothing. Soon they will lay 2 MAPL Ash-M.

By the way, how you decided to shoot at the AUG torpedo is interesting to me. Gigatorpeda how will it be induced?

Who will tell you such information? You can search the Internet. What should be.

[Cyril G ...]

According to claim 1, at such depths the PZKs lie quite to themselves, therefore, a torpedo can theoretically be heard over thousands of kilometers, and for the declared speed it is real. A torpedo is either a weapon of the first silent strike, or some kind of nonsense from a military point of view. Further, a torpedo is a waste of money in any situation and can not be compared with a rocket. And finally, the issue is not engineering technology. Now there was just a pusher for a small share. I hope that we will soon find out who is who. By the way, SOSUS and the rich experience of opposing submarines in the Anglo-Saxons have not gone away
According to claim 2 - Minus 2 MAPL did not disappear. PLA is needed here and now and not in 10 years. Ask how many live multi-purpose people we have - IMHO 5 + 1 + 3 + 2 = 11-12 units. At the same time, how many submarines are in the USA, France and England.
According to claim 3. 2 + 2 I can quite add, tea is not Newton’s bin.

[Sky strike fighter]

Ask how many live multi-purpose people we have - IMHO 5 + 1 + 3 + 2 = 11-12 units.

There will be more.
The naval composition of the Russian Navy (warships of the main classes) on 01.05.2020/XNUMX/XNUMX
https://navy-korabel.livejournal.com/237144.html

At the same time, how many submarines are in the USA, France and England.

So they didn’t have a disaster and the 90s. You would still have submarines of all NATO countries.

At such depths, PZKs are completely lying, therefore, a torpedo can theoretically be heard over thousands of kilometers

Funny about the theory.

By the way, SOSUS and the rich experience of opposing submarines in the Anglo-Saxons have not gone away

Its capabilities are very limited.

[Cyril G ...]

I'm definitely funny. About PZK did not hear.
SOSUS is mothballed. There will be a real threat, re-preserve and change campus. The roaring Poseidon will surely be heard. In silent mode, 4-6 knots will crawl to America for months. What the hell do you need this weapon for?

And do not drag Shishkin. I counted boats in the ranks. Do you understand the difference? Total! and in service, combat ready! and?

[Sky strike fighter]

By the way, SOSUS and the rich experience of opposing submarines in the Anglo-Saxons have not gone away

In my opinion, they rejected SOSUS. It became not effective.

As a result, of all the BSAS operating in the 80s, only four were left in their original form.
Despite the positive experience of using the SOSUS system, it also had drawbacks, one of which was mentioned above, high cost, another drawback is cumbersome and not agility i.e. In order to organize monitoring of underwater objects in a new area, it is necessary to carry out lengthy work on installing this system and organizing its connection with the BGAS post each time. But the main drawback was that the detection and classification of modern nuclear submarines with a noise of Psh = 0,05 Pa using BGAS became problematic even when it was in close proximity to the receiving antenna, i.e. BGAS "Agam" has ceased to meet the requirements of the tactical and technical specifications for the detection of underwater and surface objects and practically does not fulfill its initial functions.
Therefore, there was a need to develop an underwater surveillance system that could quickly and covertly deploy in areas of crisis and solve a range of anti-aircraft missions in the interests of the US forces and their allies operating there.
To create such a system, it was necessary to abandon stationary passive noise-sensing systems (such as SOSUS) in favor of active passive hydroacoustic lighting systems for underwater rapid deployment.
What are such systems? A group of emitters placed in the sea in advance (installed either at the bottom, or at a given depth, or towed) sends acoustic signals according to a given program in the set frequency ranges and time intervals. These signals are received by a whole network of pre-deployed special antennas (they can be placed on submarines, surface ships, systems of discharged radio-acoustic buoys, antenna arrays located at the bottom, etc.). This group works as one giant sonar device, which allows to obtain the coordinates of the target system that has come into the zone of responsibility in the shortest possible time using echo signals. From the command post, information about the target is transmitted via space communications to the command post of the united operational formation. Thus, the location of even the most modern and low-noise submarine can be immediately established - and its destruction is extremely simplified.
Actually, the deployment of elements of active-passive sonar systems can occur from a variety of carriers - submarines (using uninhabited automatic submarines based on the mother submarine, as well as light divers), surface ships, planes and helicopters.

https://flot.com/blog/katastrofa/43879.php

[Charik]

955A construction began in 2012, only in June 2020, as usual they promise to surrender to the fleet, 8 YEARS !!!!, we are waiting for the next Ash-tree to the year 30-35m.

[Sky strike fighter]

The head submarine of project 955A. So far, everyone has worked. On Yasen-M. Kazan and Novosibirsk may at the end of this year surrender to the fleet under favorable circumstances.

[Charik]

Even with Kazan, nothing is clear, so it's too early to think about Novosibirsk

[Aag]

There is probably a difference between pre-emitting known targets (with route options) and maneuvering?

[ROSS_51]

Quote: BoA KAA

Quote: Sky Strike fighter

In the non-nuclear version, Poseidon is able to hit AUG more effectively than RCC Granite.

This machine is not planned for use in a non-nuclear version. Talking about "regular equipment" is a verbal smokescreen, so as not to shock the American public too much. one, even such a "torpedo" as Poseidon, Nimitz class AVU or D. Ford cannot be drowned. In addition, such a t-doi also needs to get into it., Without any "radius of defeat" there. And this is not so easy from the range of a volley, which is expected from this prodigy.

And why get into an aircraft carrier with an underwater nuclear drone of increased power? When this is triggered at the bottom, for example, there the whole AUG can be painted over with black. Or just a naval base.

[Ryaruav]

paint over with black, it depends on the depth and range of detonation once again review the tests on a bikini, not everything is so simple

[NEXUS]

Quote: Boa constrictor KAA

since one, even such a "torpedo" as Poseidon, Nimitz class AVU or D. Ford cannot be drowned.

Sasha welcome!
Well, with a head full of sex megatons, all the AUG in a row, then Poseidon will turn into very radioactive and lifeless scrap metal. Well, something will send to the bottom. Operation Crossroads ... remember?

[Cyril G ...]

In the Navy, or rather in the naval elite, they don’t know what is more useless, but they know who will give the most. We have multi-purpose submarines full out. You can say the verge of disaster. As a result, minus 2 multipurpose nuclear submarines. Not a damn thing.
In the non-nuclear version, Poseidon is simply nonsense. In nuclear versus AUG, too.

[Interlocutor]

The essence of the moment is that the presence of such a weapon in one, or even better in several copies, stops all adequate adversaries by 101 percent. Inadequate people are usually just chased with "brooms". For they have no weapons that can harm. Therefore it is necessary, necessary, and once again necessary to make such a weapon.

[Aag]

Or say that it is being done ...

[SVM]

the submarine itself was laid at Sevmash in July 2014. Technical details of the project are not reported.

So keep quiet about the entry date .. It would be better for such an infa, for treason, they reproached the Motherland for a long time .. Che chat!

[flicker]

after which the carrier "Poseidon" will go to the test

somewhere off the coast of the USA.
And only after the USA is washed away, the tests can be recognized as successful.

[SovAr238A]

Quote: flicker

after which the carrier "Poseidon" will go to the test

somewhere off the coast of the USA.
And only after the USA is washed away, the tests can be recognized as successful.

And what if Kamchatka or Sakhalin is washed away? Then you will be the first, out of your hozlatskish habit, to say: "And what about us?"

[flicker]

And if you wash Kamchatka or Sakhalin?

if Israel is washed away, then

out of the hozlatskish habit you will say: "And what about us?"

[for]

Better not plan, go down and show the descent report.

[Old26]

Quote: flicker

after which the carrier "Poseidon" will go to the test

somewhere off the coast of the USA.
And only after the USA is washed away, the tests can be recognized as successful.

I am afraid, dear, there will be no one to recognize, since the territory of Russia will become a radioactive desert. You are our peacemaker ...