In LNR, Russian received the status of the only state language

59
In LNR, Russian received the status of the only state language

The Lugansk People’s Republic, following the Donetsk People’s Republic, defined Russian as the only state language. This was announced on his Twitter page by the head of the LPR, Leonid Pasechnik.

The Committee of the People’s Council of the LPR voted for the bill, which defines the status of the only state language in the republic for the Russian language. The bill was introduced by the head of the LPR, Leonid Pasechnik.



At a meeting of the profile committee, deputies of the LPR People’s Council promptly considered the bill I had introduced. This decision confirms our chosen path to integration with the Russian Federation in 2014 and reflects the real aspirations of the population of the Republic

- said the head of the republic.

At the same time, Pasechnik specified that the recognition of the Russian as the only state language does not detract from the importance of Ukrainian and other languages ​​used in the republic.

According to part 2 of Article 19 of the Constitution of the Luhansk People's Republic, everyone has the right to use their native language, to freely choose the language of communication, education, training and creativity

- explained the chairman of the relevant committee of the People’s Council of the LPR Dmitry Kukarsky.

Previously, Article 10 of the LNR Constitution defined Russian and Ukrainian as the state language.

In early March, amendments to the Constitution were made in Donetsk: the Russian language was recognized as the only state language in the territory of the Donetsk People’s Republic. The corresponding decision was made by the People’s Council of the DPR.
59 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    25 March 2020 14: 55
    Good news ! Tonight you have to roll about it!
    1. -7
      25 March 2020 19: 49
      Quote: Prahlad
      Good news ! Tonight you have to roll about it!
      It sounds caricatured and stereotyped, just like sarcasm. But this is a really sincere statement, that’s funny)))
  2. -28
    25 March 2020 14: 55
    Well, why copy the evil deeds of Kiev?
    Would leave two languages ​​and all. No...
    Head, run, rake.
    1. +7
      25 March 2020 16: 41
      Copying of Kiev will begin with the closure of Ukrainian schools. In Ukraine, even Russian classes want to close, while Tatar and Hungarian remain.
      Switzerland lives beautifully with FOUR state languages.
      1. -11
        25 March 2020 17: 09
        Quote: knn54
        In Ukraine, even Russian classes want to close.

        You are mistaken. They have long been closed.
        But ... I believe that such a decision was made too soon. I will explain.
        At one time, when Ukraine canceled teaching in Russian at schools and translated everything into Ukrainian, the Russians living in Ukraine were very disappointed. And from this resentment, Crimea and the Donbass also happened. Today, ethnic Ukrainians also live in LDN. And we cannot but understand that, in connection with the adoption of this law, the possibility of studying the Ukrainian language for Ukrainian children will be reduced. There is nothing wrong, but resentment will remain. Why the new state. entities (states) to begin their lives by offending their citizens? What is the need for this? I believe that in this matter the authorities of the LDP have begun, i.e. not yet completely, but began to follow the path paved by Ukraine.
        And they gave Kiev an extra reproach to throw at the LPNR in "oppression of the Ukrainian language."
  3. +3
    25 March 2020 14: 55
    Is this a mistake?
    Maybe it makes sense, as in the Crimea, official bilingualism?
    Although the place is more visible than from my sofa.
    1. -5
      25 March 2020 15: 04
      After this, the meaning of the Russian spring is lost. After all, the first message was stupid laws on the only state - Ukrainian. And immediately the topic of infringement of the rights of Russian speakers arose. Now we have to admit that either they were wrong then, or now ...
    2. +6
      25 March 2020 16: 06
      Quote: Victor_B
      Is this a mistake?

      hi
      The state language defined by law (IMHO) should be one. This is the language in which all state acts and governing documents are drawn up. And this is not an infringement of the regional nat. formations and ethnic groups that can communicate, study and send rites in their native language or dialect.
      1. -1
        25 March 2020 16: 08
        Quote: Lelek
        The state language defined by law (IMHO) should be one.

        Switzerland and Canada live with NOT ONE official language.
        And do not tweet.
        1. +3
          25 March 2020 16: 16
          Quote: Victor_B
          Switzerland and Canada live with NOT ONE


          Well and how many times in the same Canada, French-speaking and English-speaking wall-to-wall went into the muzzle to the point of dividing the country into two halves. As for Switzerland, it so happened in connection with the banking system, and she (Switzerland) is no example to us in this part.
          1. -2
            25 March 2020 16: 19
            Countries with two official languages

            Canada (English, French)
            Netherlands (Dutch, West Frisian)
            Finland (Finnish, Swedish)
            Ireland (Irish, English)
            Cyprus (Greek, Turkish)
            Israel (Hebrew, Arabic)
            India (Indian (Hindi), English)
            Iraq (Arabic, Kurdish)

            Countries with more than two official languages

            Belgium (French, Dutch and German)
            UK (English, Irish and Scottish)
            Luxembourg (Luxembourgish, French, German)
            Switzerland (German, French and Italian, partly also Romansh)
            South Africa (11 languages, including English, Afrikaans, Venda, Zulu, Spit)
            New Zealand (English, Maori and New Zealand Sign Language)

            Well stupid!
            1. +6
              25 March 2020 17: 10
              Victor_B, how do you imagine the adoption of Ukrainian as the state language in the L / DPR, while 6 years in a row the republics have been systematically fired upon by "people" demanding total Ukrainization of the population of the republics?
              1. -3
                25 March 2020 17: 12
                Quote: Ded_Mazay
                how do you imagine the adoption in L / DPR as the state language of Ukrainian
                Just do not prohibit it (in fact) by the adoption of the law on the ONLY official language.
                In this case, as I understand it, no one is going to prohibit learning Ukrainian.
                1. +3
                  25 March 2020 17: 18
                  Quote: Victor_B
                  Just do not prohibit it (in fact) by the adoption of the law on the ONLY official language.
                  In this case, as I understand it, no one is going to prohibit learning Ukrainian.

                  And how is it forbidden? Please, do not confuse yourself or others.
                  1. -2
                    25 March 2020 17: 21
                    Quote: Ded_Mazay
                    And how is it forbidden?

                    And do you not confuse the concept of the STATE language and the language of national minorities?
                    Of which (minorities) no one is going to infringe.
                    1. +2
                      25 March 2020 17: 36
                      Quote: Victor_B
                      Quote: Ded_Mazay
                      And how is it forbidden?

                      And do you not confuse the concept of the STATE language and the language of national minorities?
                      Of which (minorities) no one is going to infringe.

                      Horses mixed in a bunch, people ...
                      I am not confusing anything. That you are somehow strangely speaking. Here's the thing:
                      Quote: Victor_B

                      minority language
                      ?
                      You wrote just above:
                      Quote: Victor_B
                      Just do not prohibit it (in fact) by the adoption of the law on the ONLY official language.
                      . I somehow can’t understand how you came to the conclusion that this law forbids something?
                2. +1
                  25 March 2020 17: 33
                  Quote: Victor_B
                  Quote: Ded_Mazay
                  how do you imagine the adoption in L / DPR as the state language of Ukrainian
                  Just do not prohibit it (in fact) by the adoption of the law on the ONLY official language.
                  In this case, as I understand it, no one is going to prohibit learning Ukrainian.

                  Petrovich correctly explained .. So it should be. No one is going to forbid, but important state documents and instruction in schools and universities should be in Russian, as it is more suitable for explanation and training, etc.
            2. +2
              25 March 2020 18: 25
              Popua New Guinea record holder - 150 languages!
              1. 0
                25 March 2020 18: 27
                Quote: Alex Justice
                Popua New Guinea record holder - 150 languages!

                In Russia, probably more, but the STATE one.
                At the same time, two in the autonomies.
        2. 0
          26 March 2020 13: 01
          Canada has its own problems. There have already been attempts to split up. Not yet succeeded.
    3. +2
      25 March 2020 23: 26
      In Crimea, there is a trilingualism - Russian, Ukrainian and Crimean Tatar.
    4. +1
      26 March 2020 00: 49
      Quote: Victor_B
      Maybe it makes sense, as in the Crimea, official bilingualism?

      As far as I know, there are 3 state languages: Russian, Ukrainian and Crimean Tatar. However, I was there twice, the first time the day before, in 2013 and the second time in 2017. Both times all who I met spoke Russian. In 2013, Ukrainian met a couple of times, but these were vacationers from the western parts of Ukraine. but in Crimean Tatar I did not hear conversations at all, including Crimean Tatars. introduction of 3 official languages, political act. It has no practical basis. IMHO. request
  4. +11
    25 March 2020 14: 57
    Quote: Lincoln
    Stupid.
    There are three state languages ​​in Crimea.

    LNR authorities rely on the opinion of the people, not on the political moment
    1. -1
      25 March 2020 15: 05
      That is, you want to say that in Crimea, the opinion of the people is sideways? ...
    2. +2
      25 March 2020 16: 07
      Was the survey conducted or did community councils decide this? It’s just interesting, in principle, the political structure of the republic ... how the opinion of the people is expressed ...
    3. -1
      25 March 2020 21: 38
      Quote: maximNNX
      LNR authorities rely on the opinion of the people, not on the political moment

      was there a referendum on the language?
      I understand that they will most likely vote for Russian (but not all 100%, which will mean infringement on someone’s rights and freedoms)
      But the bill is changing the Constitution! In which 2 languages.
      Even in Ukrainian it was originally 1. Nobody changed this article with a bill. (Although everyone safely ignores the article on the use of Russian and its development by the state)
      And here, in one fell swoop without the opinion of the people * (referendum), the draft law changed the Constitution.
  5. The comment was deleted.
  6. +1
    25 March 2020 15: 02
    This should happen throughout the former Outskirts.

    T.N. "Ukrainian" language (Polish surzhik) should receive the status of one of the languages ​​of national minorities (Polish, Hungarian and Crimean Tatar).
  7. +5
    25 March 2020 15: 02
    The most valuable thing is that they did not prohibit the use of other languages.
    1. -4
      25 March 2020 15: 40
      Well, at least this is the difference from the junta
  8. +1
    25 March 2020 15: 29
    Great news!! Everything follows the example of Ukraine. They brazenly squeeze out Russian and introduce English, as in other Eastern European countries. So let our Russians speak Russian and not Selyukovsky Ukrainian !!!)
  9. -4
    25 March 2020 15: 36
    Not far-sighted. With such an approach, LDNR will remain LDN, the project of Novorosia with this approach is not feasible.
  10. +5
    25 March 2020 15: 41
    As a citizen of the LPR, it’s nice. Let Bandera themselves indulge in their farm surzhik.
    1. +1
      25 March 2020 16: 34
      I speak Russian calmly both in the Dnieper and in Kiev. I only mumble when I need to fill out some piece of paper, but with Google translator I’m always in my pocket, this is not a problem.
      1. +3
        25 March 2020 16: 38
        Talk, we do not prohibit. There are some laws in Banderstat, and others in the Republics.
        1. +2
          25 March 2020 16: 53
          I think this topic is too hyped. Tell me, do you have any political movement there? Are any elections, referendums taking place? The majority of people for joining Russia or independent LPR? What is the percentage for autonomy in Ukraine?
          1. +3
            25 March 2020 16: 58
            Come and collect statistics if you wish.

            But the people do not want to see the Banderstad, which is still killing civilians in their own land.
            Residents of punishers, Natsiks, assholes, Banderaites, zapadentsev and other garbage do not want to see how rich the Ukrainian land is.
            1. -1
              25 March 2020 17: 12
              When do you think the war will end? In a year, five, ten years?
              1. 0
                25 March 2020 17: 31
                When in Ukraine people grow wiser and realize that they are not fighting with those.
                1. -1
                  25 March 2020 17: 40
                  Well again you are slogans. ) You are there at the epicenter of events, unlike the distant one, what is your forecast for the duration of this war unnecessary for ordinary people?
                  1. 0
                    25 March 2020 17: 52
                    Tell me, when the inhabitants of Ukraine grow wiser, I will say when the war will end.
                    1. 0
                      25 March 2020 17: 55
                      A version of the Crimea, which is completely unrealistic?
                      1. 0
                        25 March 2020 17: 55
                        What is the option of Crimea?
                      2. 0
                        25 March 2020 17: 56
                        Entry into Russia
                      3. +2
                        25 March 2020 17: 58
                        Crimea was an Autonomous Republic before being admitted to Russia. With his power. Our situation is much more complicated.
      2. +1
        25 March 2020 21: 40
        Quote: Tuzik
        I speak Russian calmly both in the Dnieper and in Kiev. I only mumble when I need to fill out some piece of paper, but with Google translator I’m always in my pocket, this is not a problem.

        Well, in Russia everyone believes that it is prohibited in Russian. Shoot on the spot.
        Although even on TV, radio, etc. Russian speech sounds. Even with these stupid quotas.
  11. +2
    25 March 2020 15: 55
    Language is only Russian. And uk-roinsky mov! And, the right decision! It's time to put points on i!
  12. Ham
    +5
    25 March 2020 16: 06
    like the local hohlobots burned ... mince hellish)))
    1. +4
      25 March 2020 17: 27
      Quote: Ham
      local hohlobot burned ..

      Yes, these sideways, for slag. Here another thing is interesting - how the local swamp manifests itself in all its glory.fellow Now there is a whine about "Donbass is being drained", now a howl begins on the topic "oh, how is that?" negative
      1. 0
        25 March 2020 19: 19
        Quote: Paranoid50
        Now there is a whine about the topic "Donbass is being drained", now a howl begins on the topic "oh, how is this so" ...

        The main thing is that everything is bad !!!
  13. -4
    25 March 2020 17: 30
    Beautiful coat of arms! Well, the decision is right .. Mova is songs, etc. And so in serious documents and training, it sounds funny (no offense)
  14. -5
    25 March 2020 17: 40
    In LNR, Russian received the status of the only state language

    New Russia followed the path of Ukraine - with the prohibitions to speak and learn in their native language?
    1. +2
      25 March 2020 19: 20
      Quote: PO-tzan
      with prohibitions to speak and learn their native language

      No, it’s just returning to its native language.
  15. -2
    25 March 2020 19: 50
    LPR has not been recognized by any UN member country; it is not a country.

    Committee of the People's Council of the LPR
    The people's committee of my apartment decided that. The same thing from the point of view of international law.
  16. -2
    26 March 2020 07: 07
    A clear separation of the powers of the LPR, DPR and some commentators on the basis of ours - a spy, theirs - a spy. When there is one state language in Ukraine, they are "foshizd", oppression of the Russian-speaking people, etc. When the same is the case in the LPR and the DPR, they are so cute. Not evil foshizdy, but nice little fascists. wink