For whom is the new Constitution?


So, we have a month left until the moment we have to express our will about the sudden and urgent amendments to the Constitution. It seems like our opinion is worth something and deciding something.


The task was clearly set: to get acquainted with all the amendments to the Constitution and make an analysis: which ones will be harmful, which ones will be useful, and which ones about nothing.

Thoughtful reading of ALL amendments took a very decent amount of time, and this is what I would like to tell you after reading and comprehending.

I do not understand, to be honest, because of what such a noise.

No, if you accept the point of view that all this was conceived for the sake of zeroing, then yes, everything is in order. But was it worth it to fence such a garden?

In principle, all amendments can be grouped into three heaps.

First one. About the state system. In principle, nothing of such vital importance, I don’t know how we lived without the fact that only Moscow can be the capital, and only Russian can be the only common language. But somehow they lived here.

The second one. Arrangement "for the people." In general, all this is there in laws and codes, why it is necessary to introduce it into the Constitution is difficult to understand. The same controversial lawmaking as the first pile.

The third. President and state apparatus. Well yes, everything is pretty useful there. President and senior officials. This all doesn’t concern us at all, because if some next president wants to change everything, I think he will do it all in much the same way as Putin. With the same ease.

In general, I did not find any such stunning innovations. In principle, I agree that amendments, following the time, must be introduced. Gradually, not freaking out, without all this hype.

But how can we do this? Not. We need to take and plump before the people in the style of "vote, or lose." Amendments must be urgently adopted, or ...

However, we’ll talk about these “or” at the end, but for now we’ll rummage around in heaps.

First pile.

Articles 1, 68, 69, 70, 71. Nothing new, except that, besides Moscow, there can be no capital anywhere else. The rest is so-so.

Article 671. This is the MOST, where the ancestors who transmitted to us ideals and faith in God, protection historical truths and children as the most important priority of the spiritual policy of the state.

The cocktail is funny and creepy at the same time. It’s impressive with just such a hodgepodge, unrelated to anything.

Article 72. This is where the institution of marriage is defined as the union of a man and a woman. Well, as we used to live without a definition, I don’t dare say, but at least the representatives of the sexes from 3 to 24 seem to shine nothing.

The first article, where something sensible flashed.

Article 75. Everything according to Zadornov, to restrain laughter is unrealistic.

“Protecting and ensuring the stability of the ruble is the main function of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, which it carries out independently of other government bodies.”

I looked. The dollar is almost 80, the euro is almost 86. The Central Bank of the Russian Federation is doing its job. Nabiullina should be given the Hero of Labor of Russia.

Articles 751, 79, 791 are simply a jumble of letters. Higher, you know, leaders, you can’t have accounts abroad. So what? Children and other relatives can and even need. In short, about nothing.

Next, the most important thing. For the sake of what, everything was started.

Articles 81, 83, 921, 93 are devoted to the president and his opportunities. Immunity after termination of authority, appointment and so on. Everything is very interesting, but I liked only one point. I was impressed.

Article 93, paragraph 1. The President of the Russian Federation may be removed from office, and the President of the Russian Federation, who has ceased to exercise his powers, may be deprived of immunity by the Federation Council only on the basis of the charges raised by the State Duma for treason or the commission of another serious crime, confirmed by the conclusion Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on the presence in the actions of the President of the Russian Federation of both the current and the termination of the exercise of his powers crimes and the conclusion of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation on compliance with the established procedure for bringing charges.

In modern conditions, the president of Russia will not be removed from office. No way. I liked the item. True, what is there to impeachment threaten ...

Articles 95, 97,102, 103, 1031, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 117 are introduced with some changes on the topic of who appoints whom. Or takes off. In general, informative, but ...

This is not for citizens, it is a Duma-sovfederovskie showdown (theoretical), which we can not influence under any circumstances. This is not our whole business, the electorate.

Articles 118, 119, 125, 126, 128, 129 deal with the courts. Just believe, the judges had everything, is and will be fine.

The next block is devoted to local government.

Articles 131, 132, 133. Well, a little bit gave the local authorities the power to assign taxes and fees, but the rest was all about elections. How and where to choose whom.

Все.

What can I say on behalf of a person who has read everything in good faith? Honestly, boring and uninteresting. Not at all interesting.

No, of course, that children - this is the main component of spiritual development - it is wonderful. That the Russian language will be the main one, and national minorities have the right to study in their native language, is also delightful. That the family is a union of a man and a woman I welcome.

Creating conditions for a decent upbringing of children in the family, as well as for adult children to take care of their parents - yes, of course. It just needed to be written in the Constitution that children should take care of their parents.

97% of amendments to the Constitution exclusively affect the president, the State Duma, the government, the Federation Council, the Constitutional Court, lower courts, officials. How they will elect, appoint, remove and so on.

In general, just a slight restructuring of the existing system of power "for themselves." Under a long and happy rule for the good of Russia.

Did not impress.

Okay, Putin is happy with those who have started all this. We know them, heroes both in the literal and figurative sense of the word. Timchenko, Rotenberg, Sechin, Miller, Deripaska and so on.

The entire Belgorod region, for example, is hung with banners "Our choice - Our country - Our Constitution."

Now, having studied all these amendments, I now understand on behalf of whom all these banners are. And whose country is this, whose Constitution is.

Of course, it would be nice to return the status of the subsoil back, so that not only Sechin and Miller would be rich. Yes, let them get rich, since Putin believes that a million a day is a normal salary. No problem. It’s not for me to argue, I’m the very Putin “middle class” who receives more than 17, so I won’t even open my mouth, the gills will dry up.

But in general, as a citizen, it is completely uninteresting for me how the president will propose candidates to his hand-held State Duma and how this State Duma will unanimously vote “for”. All this has already passed, it is incredibly gray and boring.

This is all for them.

And for us:

“In the Russian Federation, conditions are created for sustainable economic growth of the country and improving the welfare of citizens, for mutual trust between the state and society, guaranteeing the protection of the dignity of citizens and respect for people of work, ensuring a balance of rights and obligations of the citizen, social partnership, economic, political and social solidarity.”

Yes, this is for the people. Incredible surprise of all ranks, from Putin to the governors that “suddenly” gasoline prices jumped. In Europe and America, down, and with us, up.

And right there the gas traders came in for subsidies. Well, coronavirus, the demand for gasoline has fallen. Give me the money.

And what, steady economic growth. Way down. And improving the welfare of citizens. Now it’s clear which, I hope? Under which everything and everything is added.

Well, the cherry on the cake - this:

“The provision of part 3 of Article 81 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, limiting the number of terms during which the same person may hold the office of the President of the Russian Federation, applies to a person holding and (or) holding the office of the President of the Russian Federation, without taking into account the number of terms, in the course of which it occupied and (or) occupies this position at the time the amendment to the Constitution of the Russian Federation enters into force, introducing an appropriate restriction, and does not exclude the possibility for it to hold the office of the President Of the Russian Federation within the time limits allowed by this provision. ”

In general, to me all this is completely uninteresting to me. This clowning with pouting cheeks. This Constitution, which no one will enforce in places where enforcement will not bring preferences.

And in general, I doubt that after the next successful victory of Putin in the elections, at least someone will even remember the Constitution.

The main thing, of course, is to ensure the continuity of power. From one Putin to another. I have already made sure that the promises that Putin made at that term in office are not binding on IT. Well, nothing, the main thing is stability.

Stable impoverishment as well.

I can imagine how together we all will begin to "grow fat" in Putin's way at 100 rubles per dollar. Obesity nationwide will begin. It has already begun. At prices. Thanks to everyone who, according to the Constitution, is obliged to keep the ruble and provide the country with prosperity. The effort is visible to the naked eye.

Total Someone will go to think about how useful this is. Someone will vote in favor, because thinking is too difficult. Understanding is even more difficult.

I did not see the promised changes that would benefit all citizens of Russia. Alas. I saw exclusively the restructuring of power.

To be completely uninteresting, to be honest. Unpromising for 99% of the population.
Author:
Photos used:
kremlin.ru
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

483 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Pessimist22 24 March 2020 05: 08 New
    • 110
    • 23
    +87
    It's simple: “When robbery becomes a way of life for a group of people living together in society, then over time they create a legal system that legalizes it and glorifies its moral code.”

    Frederic Bastia (1801–1850), French liberal economist. "Economic sophisms."
    1. bessmertniy 24 March 2020 05: 45 New
      • 75
      • 21
      +54
      The theft of the country in the early 1990s did not find consolidation in the Russian constitution. It seems that now the moment has come when our elite has decided that the time has come to legitimize the stolen constitutional amendments. stop
      1. Private89 24 March 2020 06: 23 New
        • 65
        • 10
        +55
        Laws are written by the ruling class, so as soon as the class in power changes, all of their philkines of letters and fig sheets with which they hide behind go to the dustbin of history, along with those who wrote them. So there is nothing reinforced concrete in this life. And the disappearance of the USSR is a big lesson to us, that’s what happens if class vigilance and the rejection of their ideals are dulled.
        1. 210ox 24 March 2020 06: 30 New
          • 40
          • 14
          +26
          Here it is .. From the Constitution of the State they made a letter to Filkin.
          1. Stas157 24 March 2020 06: 56 New
            • 65
            • 23
            +42
            Roman correctly designated all these amendments - booth with swollen cheeks. There is no sense in them, except for the king’s authority to renew once again.

            The king is atrocious, but wants to do it under popular approval. Rather, under his appearance. Because the opinion of the people has long been trampled upon.
            1. balunn 24 March 2020 08: 14 New
              • 34
              • 11
              +23
              the tsar is 68 years old ... it’s time to retire to his grandchildren, and he sets all terms to zero
              1. Chervonny 24 March 2020 09: 56 New
                • 21
                • 5
                +16
                Power does not let go, holds a grip laughing
              2. Nicola I 24 March 2020 18: 15 New
                • 4
                • 12
                -8
                And about the amendments and their need, to think poorly?
                1. Freeman 24 March 2020 19: 50 New
                  • 9
                  • 2
                  +7
                  Quote: Nicola I
                  And about the amendments and their need, to think poorly?

                  And what is their need? Before them, as it were, there were enough federal laws.
                2. balunn 25 March 2020 11: 56 New
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  +1
                  and what is the meaning of these amendments?
            2. Chervonny 24 March 2020 09: 53 New
              • 33
              • 4
              +29
              Quote: Stas157
              There is no sense in them, except for the king’s authority to renew once again.

              This is the meaning of all the amendments. Reset and renewal. For the sake of all this all this booth was started.
              1. nils 24 March 2020 12: 48 New
                • 17
                • 3
                +14
                Quote: Red
                For the sake of all this all this booth was started.

                Hopes for a normal shift of power have been nullified for a long time. This did not happen now, but in 2012, when Putin went on a third term after the “castling”.
              2. Nicola I 24 March 2020 18: 15 New
                • 4
                • 15
                -11
                Liberal stamp
            3. DED_peer_DED 24 March 2020 14: 56 New
              • 13
              • 6
              +7
              Initially, three bones were thrown to the people: family, faith, Russian.
              And while the people will “peal” them and his mouth will be busy with this business (but not only that, we will add to the people - cheap oil, the fall of the ruble, the growth of gasoline and, most importantly, concern for survival itself) - horror stories about the “royal virus” with by winding up hysteria and bodies on the streets), slowly we’ll pour it into the constitution, most importantly, to the noise, more so that we don’t figure it out, sniff it out, do not have time ...
              And further, the legitimization of the illegitimized and the people - “sit and don’t bark, be a patriot” of bergs, mans, dwellers, etc. with redone, misrepresented or just strange and unnatural for the Russian language and ear, last names.
              People - "sit and do not bark ...", people.
            4. NordUral 24 March 2020 17: 33 New
              • 10
              • 5
              +5
              The king is atrocious, but wants to do it under popular approval. Rather, under his appearance. Because the opinion of the people has long been trampled upon.

              I used to think that I had to go and say no to the referendum. But it turned out that there would be no referendum, instead of it an invitation to thieves to vote for amendments.
              Now I join those who intend to boycott this farce. Another choice while no.
              1. Freeman 24 March 2020 20: 04 New
                • 9
                • 2
                +7
                Quote: NordUral
                The king is atrocious, but wants to do it under popular approval. Rather, under his appearance. Because the opinion of the people has long been trampled upon.

                I used to think that I had to go and say no to the referendum. But it turned out that there would be no referendum, instead of it an invitation to thieves to vote for amendments.
                Now I join those who intend to boycott this farce. Another choice while no.

                By your non-participation, you only express your tacit agreement with the actions of the "thieves."
                1. NordUral 25 March 2020 12: 01 New
                  • 4
                  • 0
                  +4
                  Buridanov donkey remembered.
              2. 30143 25 March 2020 06: 37 New
                • 0
                • 2
                -2
                It is necessary to go, definitely. If they vote against it, the Democratic forces will raise such a gevolt, and then ... sanctions and again everything in a circle. But this thief is ours, Russian!
                1. NordUral 25 March 2020 11: 59 New
                  • 2
                  • 0
                  +2
                  I don’t understand a damn thing, Winnie.
                  1. 30143 25 March 2020 16: 38 New
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    0
                    Sorry, this is for the comet Volnopera.
                    I can not understand the algorithm of work, why clings to other people?
            5. alecsis69 28 March 2020 02: 28 New
              • 1
              • 1
              0
              Mr. Skomorokhov read all the words but could not understand the meaning, about which he wrote an article. Maybe already age?
          2. Arlen 24 March 2020 07: 22 New
            • 40
            • 12
            +28
            Quote: 210ox
            Here it is .. From the Constitution of the State they made a letter to Filkin.

            All changes to the Constitution are submitted by the authorities to talk about how healthy and rich we will heal after that. It turns out that before a good life, it remains only to vote for the amendments and that’s it, we will live better than anyone else. So right away, everything will change for the better in one moment. It will not change, everything will remain as it is ...
            1. Chervonny 24 March 2020 09: 58 New
              • 31
              • 6
              +25
              Quote: Arlen
              It will not change, everything will remain as it is

              Change, only for the worse.
          3. Victor N 24 March 2020 09: 12 New
            • 8
            • 42
            -34
            Understanding is the problem of the understanding. There are many areas of activity in which each of us DOES NOT WANT to understand. And God is our judge. But it is obscene to pester specialists with their judgments, knowing that they will consider it a silly and annoying bore. If I cannot imagine how to improve state power and, moreover, I am not interested in this, then I am a bad citizen, I am ashamed. But I can support (and MUST) those who know what to do and whom I respect. And I must respect those whom I put forward and elected the people in power.
            1. Ivan Kolodin 24 March 2020 09: 43 New
              • 26
              • 7
              +19
              And where is the constitution about improving the state system? There is just a mishanin of letters, except for zeroing the terms and immunity of the president there is nothing from the point of view of legal norms, nonsense and verbiage ...
              1. Victor N 24 March 2020 15: 45 New
                • 3
                • 21
                -18
                The Russian state was not created by us, but by our ancestors over the centuries. They needed it, it was useful. This is a value. Our business is to preserve and adapt to solve new problems - to increase the value of the Russian State. This YOU (!) Were unable to understand - it happens, not all universities graduate .....
                1. victor50 24 March 2020 19: 22 New
                  • 15
                  • 1
                  +14
                  Quote: Victor N
                  The Russian state was not created by us, but by our ancestors over the centuries. They needed it, it was useful. This is a value. Our business is to preserve and adapt to solve new problems - to increase the value of the Russian State. This YOU (!) Were unable to understand - it happens, not all universities graduate .....

                  ABOUT! Guru! If the mind itself is not enough, then it is not a fact that it is not enough for those to whom you are preaching. And such a state, unfortunately, is on our conscience. I think our ancestors did not dream of such a thing, especially not so old, in the 45th.
                  1. Victor N 25 March 2020 11: 07 New
                    • 0
                    • 5
                    -5
                    My ancestors spent on the creation of the state and gave their lives, from the state they were waiting for protection, not goodies. It was then all come along ....
            2. Den717 24 March 2020 14: 41 New
              • 3
              • 5
              -2
              Quote: Victor N
              Understanding is the problem of the understanding.

              “If you don’t want to pass for a liar or a lunatic, then do not tell everyone in the steppe about the high snowy peaks” (Someone, probably, who lived, saw and comprehended)
            3. DED_peer_DED 24 March 2020 15: 00 New
              • 9
              • 4
              +5
              Quote: Victor N
              And I must respect those whom I put forward and elected the people in power.

              And if their people do not choose? And they, all one - a rod? What to do ?
              1. Den717 24 March 2020 18: 58 New
                • 3
                • 9
                -6
                Quote: DED_peer_DED
                And if their people do not choose?

                There were many who wanted to prove this, but no one was able.
                1. victor50 24 March 2020 19: 23 New
                  • 8
                  • 2
                  +6
                  Quote: Den717
                  There were many who wanted to prove this, but no one was able.

                  Happy to cheat? lol
                  1. Den717 24 March 2020 19: 26 New
                    • 3
                    • 8
                    -5
                    Quote: victor50
                    Happy to cheat?

                    Try to refute wassat
                    1. victor50 24 March 2020 19: 34 New
                      • 9
                      • 3
                      +6
                      Quote: Den717
                      Try to refute

                      If memory serves, the last election is somewhere in the Far East. This is from the official that it was already impossible to hide. Yes, and a lot of things can be said, for example, how the turnout in the last 2 hours of the site increases by 2-3 times. But you don’t need it. And the investigators, yes, did not prove anything, as expected.
                      1. Den717 24 March 2020 20: 06 New
                        • 4
                        • 11
                        -7
                        Quote: victor50
                        If memory serves, the last election is somewhere in the Far East.

                        In short, you did not succeed either .... Somewhere, somehow, someone is not evidence.
                      2. Victor N 25 March 2020 11: 11 New
                        • 1
                        • 5
                        -4
                        Until it is proved - it is CHOPPING! And violations - yes, they do.
            4. Revival 24 March 2020 15: 17 New
              • 15
              • 6
              +9
              Yes, I remember how live 146% of voters voted. Oh! Bad luck.
              This is all you need to know about our elections, the very ones at which "the people chose" ...
            5. NordUral 24 March 2020 17: 36 New
              • 8
              • 3
              +5
              I did not put forward these and did not vote for them.
              1. Den717 24 March 2020 18: 59 New
                • 3
                • 12
                -9
                Quote: NordUral
                I did not put forward these and did not vote for them.

                We have democracy, so a minority will be forced to submit to the majority.
                1. Essex62 25 March 2020 06: 45 New
                  • 0
                  • 1
                  -1
                  Rather, the opposite. In fairness, it must be said that this is so everywhere.
                  1. Den717 25 March 2020 06: 52 New
                    • 2
                    • 2
                    0
                    Quote: Essex62
                    Rather, the opposite. In fairness, it must be said that this is so everywhere.

                    There is a law of reason in logic. According to which all true thought must be justified. Can you give reasons for your claim of justice without the use of the terms "believe / disbelieve"?
                    1. Essex62 25 March 2020 10: 19 New
                      • 0
                      • 6
                      -6
                      The minority, you are the backbones and strive to bend the rest. Most, that is, what is more logical? I don’t want to prove anything to you. There is no sense. The time will come once we clarify our innocence
                      1. Den717 25 March 2020 11: 35 New
                        • 3
                        • 1
                        +2
                        Quote: Essex62
                        I don’t want to prove anything to you. There's no point.

                        Rather, there is no possibility. Knowledge of the subject is lacking, so the function of "faith" is turned on. And with this subject, in general, everything is complicated. Because whoever pours into the free space in the head, he will convert to his faith.
                        Quote: Essex62
                        The time will come

                        Probably you mean with the help of Comrade Kalashnikov? We will have counterarguments, do not worry. Although you don’t have to expect practical actions from you, because nothing except flows from under you besides an unpleasant substance. You will not leave your kitchen to do something. You don’t even know who you’re talking to, but you’re trying to threaten them with insults. Are convincing arguments over? Funny you, right.
                      2. Essex62 25 March 2020 14: 16 New
                        • 0
                        • 3
                        -3
                        Judging by the comments, who you understand. And finish here. Your problem is that you, too, do not know who they are hanging labels hanging. A threat? No way. Historical process. Inevitably this is a huckster to the nail.
                        By the way, where did I insult you?
                      3. Den717 25 March 2020 14: 35 New
                        • 1
                        • 2
                        -1
                        Quote: Essex62
                        Historical process. Inevitably this is a huckster to the nail.

                        Unfortunately, socialism lasted 74 years and ended in almost all countries where it lived. What historical process do you mean, the triumph of a market economy?
                        Quote: Essex62
                        you are not knowing who you are talking with

                        Are you talking about "riddlers"?
      2. Sirocco 25 March 2020 16: 08 New
        • 3
        • 1
        +2
        Quote: 210ox
        Here it is .. From the Constitution of the State they made a letter to Filkin.

        Have you read the constitutional amendments? I read, try to spend some precious time and get acquainted with the amendments, well, there’s nothing there that many people write and groan about, read gentlemen read !!!!
    2. Malyuta 24 March 2020 08: 31 New
      • 39
      • 11
      +28
      Quote: Private 89
      Laws are written by the ruling class,

      “All countries have their own mafia. But only in Russia does the mafia have its own country!” (C)
    3. tihonmarine 24 March 2020 10: 24 New
      • 12
      • 1
      +11
      Quote: Private 89
      Laws are written by the ruling class

      The simplest and most comprehensive answer.
    4. Jager 25 March 2020 07: 15 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Which of them will betray the ideals of the golden calf? Gendarmes do not sleep on social elevators.
    5. flicker 25 March 2020 19: 03 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      all their filkin letters and fig sheets with which they are hiding will go to the dustbin of history, along with those who wrote them.

      Yes, they’ve checked Novaya Gazeta on the fact of cooperation with terrorists.
      It’s high time to press the tails to all these grant-eaters and Western mongrels.
  2. Svarog 24 March 2020 07: 26 New
    • 33
    • 13
    +20
    Quote: bessmertniy
    legitimize stolen constitutional amendments.

    That is not .. they want to cut for life .. here they decided to change the Constitution .. and betray everything to the children .. then when that .. and grandchildren .. that’s the point ..
    1. Victor N 24 March 2020 09: 19 New
      • 13
      • 41
      -28
      In VO, you can identify and then catch the entire fifth column.
      1. Ivan Kolodin 24 March 2020 09: 44 New
        • 26
        • 8
        +18
        Exactly, but a little self-critical, but thanks for the honesty, not everyone admits that he is a traitor
      2. AA17 24 March 2020 11: 23 New
        • 24
        • 2
        +22
        Dear Victor N. So that you do not get confused and have a clear concept - what is the “fifth column”, I offer you clear definitions given by Valentin KATASONOV.
        "... The Russian media use the term" fifth column "in the singular. In fact, in Russia there are many such" fifth columns ". In fact, we have a many-headed hydra, and I want to take an inventory of its heads. According to my estimates, there are at least seven.
        1. Offshore aristocracy (OA) - a narrow group of people who are formally considered citizens of the Russian Federation, and in fact are "non-residents", because their capital, assets, property are located outside the country ....
        2. Foreign capital within the country. First of all, foreign companies and banks are an ideal wallet for financing any subversive actions. Secondly, foreign companies and banks at the command of the Financial International can at any time destabilize the economic, political and social situation in the country ....
        3. Media, the funds for the maintenance of which are sent from abroad or from internal sources controlled by the West ....
        4. Part of a multi-million army of immigrants. Among them there are many people who arrived in the Russian Federation not so much to earn money ...
        5. Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) ....
        6. The Central Bank of the Russian Federation (Bank of Russia) as a special extraterritorial entity ....
        7. Russian banks, since this year, obeying the requirements of the American law "On taxation of foreign accounts", which makes the concept of national sovereignty in the financial sphere a fiction ... ". Http://tr.rkrp-rpk.ru/get.php?5297
        1. Den717 24 March 2020 14: 48 New
          • 4
          • 12
          -8
          Quote: AA17
          I offer you clear definitions given by Valentin KATASONOV.

          I understand that the appeal is not to me, but nevertheless, who is this Katasonov to blindly listen to his sayings? Which plant did you manage? What is the area from the depressed brought to the "donor"? What did he do with his theoretical training practical, except for his dissertations and teaching what he himself had never done? There are many such theoretical economists, and all contradict each other. But completely different people are engaged in real affairs. And these only broadcast .....
          1. Nicola I 24 March 2020 18: 21 New
            • 7
            • 1
            +6
            Katasonov is a person with a high level of understanding of reality, unlike some. And this sneaky trick is to discredit the author, but in fact he said nothing to say. Is it possible to deny that the offshore aristocracy, immigrants, and the Central Bank belong to the fifth column? It turns out there is no way to deny it, otherwise they will say-it was completely dived. Therefore, it remains an unenviable fate to take advantage of the kindergarten trick-to pour mud on the author, like you're nobody, and who am I!
            1. Den717 24 March 2020 19: 01 New
              • 3
              • 6
              -3
              Quote: Nicola I
              Katasonov a person with a high level of understanding of reality

              What practical is this understanding. You answer specifically, where were Katasonov’s theories put into practice? No dirt, bring the facts.
          2. Malyuta 24 March 2020 21: 22 New
            • 13
            • 4
            +9
            Quote: Den717
            But completely different people are engaged in real affairs.

            Are these rotenbergs with timchens and sechins or something? Or maybe the Mordashevs with Deripaska, the Michelsons with the Abramovichs and Somanov’s, and the Kerimka?
            Do these heroes do things? Well, they’ve already done 5 VSWs for each.
            1. Den717 24 March 2020 22: 00 New
              • 3
              • 9
              -6
              Quote: Malyuta
              Are these rotenbergs with timchens and sechins or something?

              At least Rotenberg built a bridge, Sechin produces oil. And from theorists what? Tons of wood spent on paper, economic theories and doctrines on which no one can build anything practical. From them, there is often often only one sewage voltage.
        2. Victor N 24 March 2020 15: 55 New
          • 3
          • 12
          -9
          Katasonov - little authority. And the list of enemies of the state, to put it mildly, is not unconditional.
          1. Nicola I 24 March 2020 18: 24 New
            • 5
            • 3
            +2
            Another authority overthrower. Then we are waiting for the “unconditional” list from the “great” authority.
            1. Den717 24 March 2020 19: 03 New
              • 3
              • 5
              -2
              Quote: Nicola I
              Then we are waiting for the “unconditional” list from the “great” authority.

              It is recommended not to create idols for yourself, to live your own mind.
      3. Revival 24 March 2020 15: 04 New
        • 5
        • 2
        +3
        So urgently wipe all comments, you still have a chance to hide in the taiga
      4. NordUral 24 March 2020 17: 38 New
        • 7
        • 1
        +6
        Appearance, victor n?
      5. victor50 24 March 2020 19: 25 New
        • 5
        • 1
        +4
        Quote: Victor N
        In VO, you can identify and then catch the entire fifth column.

        And even the sixth! Well, those with the number six! laughing
    2. DED_peer_DED 24 March 2020 15: 02 New
      • 6
      • 2
      +4
      That is not .. they want to cut for life .. that’s what they decided on the Constitution
      out of habit - cut.
  3. Chervonny 24 March 2020 09: 50 New
    • 21
    • 3
    +18
    Quote: bessmertniy
    the time has come - to legitimize the stolen constitutional amendments

    good
    And legalize the redistribution of property
  4. AAK
    AAK 24 March 2020 11: 12 New
    • 12
    • 5
    +7
    A colleague, in my opinion, is not so much an attempt to legitimize the stolen goods as an attempt to nip the root by intimidation of any discontent of the people and eliminating the slightest chance of positive changes in the future. And although they attribute to Stalin the phrase "... it doesn’t matter who votes, but it is important who believes ...", but conscience simply does not allow voting for it, regardless of personal consequences ... In short, there is a systematic slide into totalitarianism for some and serfdom for others
  5. CTEPX 25 March 2020 01: 40 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Quote: bessmertniy
    The theft of the country in the early 1990s did not find consolidation in the Russian constitution.

    Yah? In your opinion, the Constitution 1993 years did not consolidate the process of plundering the country in the early 1990s?
  • Far B 24 March 2020 05: 56 New
    • 47
    • 16
    +31
    In a good way, there is a criminal act, forcible seizure and retention of power. Violent - because Putin, whatever one may say, is the supreme commander in chief, the state apparatus of coercion is fully concentrated in his hands. If you try to object, they make you feel like a darling. And all of this is well understood, and therefore the indignation is only on the Internet.
    But in a good way, the same FSB bodies should be aroused now, but take these businessmen under the white handles, and bring them to the frontal place, for the fun of an honest person ... So that it would be inconsistent in the future.
    1. Stas157 24 March 2020 07: 13 New
      • 34
      • 12
      +22
      The basic law of the country is the Constitution, under Putin the value is variable, it is decorative in nature. What can not be said about the unshakable Putin, since he, unlike the Constitution, is a constant value. Constant ... But I would like the other way around.
      1. Nicola I 24 March 2020 18: 26 New
        • 5
        • 5
        0
        But what about the amendments? That is another supporter of same-sex marriage, the distribution of the territory of Russia, the management of the country by foreigners?
        1. Freeman 24 March 2020 20: 23 New
          • 4
          • 3
          +1
          Quote: Nicola I
          But what about the amendments? That is another supporter of same-sex marriage, the distribution of the territory of Russia, management of the country by foreigners?

          That is, you acknowledge that Yeltsin, Medvedev and Putin are “foreigners” ?!
          Well, at least - "foreign mercenaries"?

          - What a twist! belay wassat
    2. Malyuta 24 March 2020 08: 33 New
      • 25
      • 9
      +16
      Quote: Far In
      But in a good way, the same FSB bodies should be aroused now, but take these businessmen under the white handles, and bring them to the frontal place, for the fun of an honest person ... So that it would be inconsistent in the future.

      But do they not participate in the acts of power, justifying themselves by the fact that they have an order.
    3. Ivan Kolodin 24 March 2020 09: 58 New
      • 23
      • 6
      +17
      Ordinary FSB officers are pulling the strap, but almost all the top leadership, unfortunately, however Soviet the KGB officers are making money, make money in every way possible, probably everyone knows one episode with cherkalin is worth it, the best roof is like an office clerk in Moscow, especially so ... Fish specifically from the rotten, they don’t allow normal and honest guys to grow ... Therefore, do not count on the FSB there your own cleaning is required and not weak ...
      1. DED_peer_DED 24 March 2020 15: 10 New
        • 12
        • 2
        +10
        Quote: Ivan Kolodin
        Ordinary FSB officers are pulling the strap, but almost all the top leadership, unfortunately, however regrettably the Soviet KGB officers, make money in every way possible

        And so on throughout the "vertical".
        The system is such that it allows an individual to go up only under a few conditions:
        1. Relative, close, "your boyfriend."
        2. Unprincipled, disobedience, "shared participation" (this type - devotion).
        3. Meanness, spiritual callousness, attitude to people as a material (both to those and to others but all one ...).
        4. Low mental abilities (so that he knew the place and did not swell).
        According to such personal "data" the "environment", power, etc. are selected. starting from the lowest levels and higher.
        Similar ones move up the existing "ladder".
        Normal and honest are filtered by the "system" already at the LOWEST level! The methods are different, I will not list, we have heard about them all ...
        By the way, a similar property of the "system" to filter people ALREADY at the very initial level, at the first stages of growth, and led to the fact that some write - "Putin has no alternatives ..." (C).
        This is right, because through the efforts of the "system" all normal people are destroyed already at the very first steps and it is easy for them to take it at the country level - NOTHING ...
    4. Varyag71 24 March 2020 11: 36 New
      • 15
      • 3
      +12
      These bodies have now been sold for a long time. They have no faith
    5. Roman12345678 24 March 2020 12: 19 New
      • 6
      • 4
      +2
      If you try to object, they make you feel like a darling. And all of this is well understood, and therefore the indignation is only on the Internet.
      And in a good way, the same bodies of the FSB would now get aroused yes, take these businessmen


      Heh .. maybe even the State Duma should be outraged ?? Or do prosecutors start working in this direction ??
      It’s not in vain that Putin gathered and lured them all around so that now someone would suddenly become excited .. They wouldn’t let anyone excited there for a cannon shot .. in the best case, they would shoot a bullet in the forehead .. Science would also be different ...
    6. DED_peer_DED 24 March 2020 15: 07 New
      • 3
      • 2
      +1
      Quote: Far In
      Violent - because Putin, whatever one may say, is the supreme commander in chief, the state apparatus of coercion is fully concentrated in his hands. You try to object - and they make you feel pretty

      "The state is me!"
      Attributed to the French King Louis XIV (1643-1715)
    7. Ross xnumx 24 March 2020 20: 48 New
      • 7
      • 2
      +5
      Quote: Far In
      Violent - because Putin, whatever one may say, is the supreme commander in chief, the state apparatus of coercion is fully concentrated in his hands.

      Yes, he is violent because, having come to power according to the same rules and the same terms, they decided to appropriate the right to impose laws by which this power will remain with them forever.
    8. flicker 25 March 2020 00: 32 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      And in a good way, the same FSB bodies should be aroused now, but take these businessmen under the little white hands, and bring them to the frontal place, for fun to the honest people ...
      I fully support if you mean grant eaters and grant suckers.
      Grantoedami they are called people who receive money from our enemies for doing certain work for them that is harmful to the country.
  • Finches 24 March 2020 06: 37 New
    • 29
    • 63
    -34
    I myself am from a couch squeezed from the relentless struggle against the "bloody regime", I like to criticize the authorities, but Roman in his articles has really slipped into frenzied pessimism! laughing
    I flew to Siberia just now, then I returned to Europe, what I want to say with the example of coronavirus - our authorities work calmly and without hysteria - there are public transport, everything is in stores, no one panic, no hysterical ones are accepted, like in (in) Ukraine measures, and adequate solutions ... Oil, but why Putin went 100% none of us know, but we have more reserves in the bins of the Motherland than Saudi Arabia and it’s not good for them from such a situation - but I don’t forgive the Arabs for the collapse of oil prices in the USSR — the same blow was a blow to the stomach of our then-sick state — if anyone doesn’t remember or forget. And the market was brought down not by the fact of incompleteness with the Saudis, but by their subsequent loud voices. These gallant wars of Allah, obviously in collusion with their overseas friends, began to dump long before our OPEC + agreement exited - that is, it was time to change the rules on the oil markets and stop groveling before the Saudis overseas ears grow ... And Russia already there is an opportunity for this, and Uncle Vova did it - what, what, and his strategic flair is always at his best! There, in Riyadh, two princes were immediately arrested: the king’s brother and a former heir - which suggests that not everything goes smoothly with the Saudis at the top! But most importantly, there are no queues for the dollar in Russia, no one is buying up TVs ... People are wise! Judging by the news, foreign investors are not breaking out of Russia, but on the contrary, because Russia is now the most stable place in terms of business due to the problem of the pandemic of China and the bustling Europe.
    Amendments - I already wrote that I do not consider them necessary, but I had to somehow defeat the reset - and I personally, let the GDP continue to steer! Russia is a huge country and not always prosperous, it will not survive without a firm ruler in a confrontation with the United States and its sixes! A bear, an example marked by all of us ... And here they argue in America - in Russia there is an “Vanguard”, in Russia there is a “Dagger” ... not a khukh of a mukhra! In Syria and Trump, the Turkish gopnik in Sochi has become quiet and flies, and not the GDP, in Ankara ... Who helps today prosperous Italy - Russia!
    Yes, there are enough internal problems, so when were they missing? And through the prism of my life experience, I believe that for Russia socialism is a more advantageous system - with the dictatorship of the Communist Party, but since it is not there, then let there be a dictatorship of GDP ... And let’s see!
    1. Banshee 24 March 2020 07: 01 New
      • 60
      • 21
      +39
      Quote: Finches
      In his articles, the novel has really slipped into frenzied pessimism!


      You wrote stupidity, to be honest. You are for Putin-well, and no one is captive, go vote. Sorry, but you have already voted for the fall of the ruble, the rise in prices, pension theft. I'll see how you ride in Europe next year, with a dollar of rubles for 120 and euros for 150.

      No, of course, if Gazprom pays for you, then go for a drive.

      Moreover, just don’t think that I envy you, as if I don’t have a move in Europe.
      1. Finches 24 March 2020 07: 10 New
        • 25
        • 48
        -23
        I wrote about our Europe laughing I’m not allowed to travel abroad ... No, not stupidity! Compare with the crises of the late 90s and now, even in 2014 there was more stupidity - you need to get away from dollar dependence, but this is not a quick and easy way. Russia went this way after the sanction of 2014 and has already lost about $ 50 billion, but has not slipped into the chaos of the economic crisis of the 90s, or do you persistently not notice it?
        And I don’t go to the polls in principle! Since 1996 ... But I’ll ask you a question - who will you choose, at least! And I always compare through the prism of my army service - and I know that GDP is really made and I understand how much it all costs ... However, the Russian person is always dissatisfied with something - I have a brother - lives in an elite house, has 6 cars ... Yes, he works a lot, but Putin scolds everything! Now to build a house near Sochi, apparently, that would conduct its revolutionary activities right in the rear of the "enemy"! laughing
        1. Aerodrome 24 March 2020 07: 19 New
          • 40
          • 14
          +26
          Quote: Finches
          No, not stupid! Compare with crises of the late 90s

          real Nonsense, give an example of 90s.
          1. Finches 24 March 2020 07: 51 New
            • 15
            • 40
            -25
            Why stupidity? Then the main problem of the person was to scrape together a loaf of bread, and now he should have a good car in the courtyard, but his wife’s car should be dull ... laughing
            1. Prometey 24 March 2020 09: 39 New
              • 25
              • 7
              +18
              Quote: Finches
              Why stupidity? Then the main problem of the person was to scrape together on a loaf of bread, and now he should fix the car in the courtyard of the house, and let his wife’s car burn down ..

              Zadolbali you already with your machines - is that - a criterion of welfare?
              1. Chervonny 24 March 2020 10: 04 New
                • 30
                • 6
                +24
                Quote: Prometey
                Is that a welfare criterion?

                For him, yes, the criterion. And the fact that he does not notice cars on credit.
                1. DED_peer_DED 24 March 2020 15: 20 New
                  • 6
                  • 5
                  +1
                  Quote: Red
                  And the fact that he does not notice cars on credit.

                  And if only cars !!! People credited at the most - I do not want.
                  This, this kind of modern slavery.
                  Slave owners are bankers, oligarchs, and power that sings along with them.
                  If you have any questions, I took the installment plan for the refrigerator for the last time in 1985, for 2 years. So, for information.
                  1. Ross xnumx 24 March 2020 20: 53 New
                    • 6
                    • 0
                    +6
                    Quote: DED_peer_DED
                    If you have any questions, I took the installment plan for the refrigerator for the last time in 1985, for 2 years. So, for information.

                    If anything, I took a loan in 1979 at 4% for six months. How many are now offering ...
                    I do not see an urgent need to fall into credit bondage. For what? Feed the bankers?
                    1. Malyuta 24 March 2020 21: 04 New
                      • 10
                      • 3
                      +7
                      Quote: ROSS 42
                      I do not see an urgent need to fall into credit bondage. For what? Feed the bankers?

                      We do not have bankers, we have bandits, they just changed their styles, the thimbles became larger, only the schemes were old.
              2. Finches 24 March 2020 21: 34 New
                • 2
                • 4
                -2
                No, this is a comparative contrast!
            2. Varyag71 24 March 2020 11: 43 New
              • 17
              • 5
              +12
              African countries are also full of cars. And also nowhere to put and traffic jams. Is this an indicator?
              1. Ross xnumx 24 March 2020 20: 58 New
                • 7
                • 3
                +4
                Quote: Varyag71
                African countries are also full of cars. And also nowhere to put and traffic jams. Is this an indicator?

                good
                So, “yours” will understand this from his high bell tower? For him, apparently, it is not a criterion that in the regional center of Kuzbass, for example, there are wooden barracks and houses with stove heating and amenities in the courtyard. And the streets of Zavodskoy district are disfigured by "gypsy high-rises" selling drugs ... The true achievement of Putin’s power.
              2. Finches 24 March 2020 21: 35 New
                • 3
                • 4
                -1
                Have you been to African countries ... For example, Angola?
            3. WIKI 24 March 2020 11: 51 New
              • 10
              • 5
              +5
              Quote: Finches
              Why stupidity? Then the main problem of the person was to scrape together a loaf of bread, and now he should have a good car in the courtyard, but his wife’s car should be dull ... laughing

              I would be glad together with you for such achievements. only the trouble, this is not the merit of the authorities and Putin personally, but:
              Why rejoice?
              1. Finches 24 March 2020 21: 43 New
                • 6
                • 5
                +1
                I write 100500 times - I have something to compare with - what is the weakness of my position? I, through the prism of your life, you are yours - everything is subjective in reality, but you don’t need to juggle it, even if you personally for some reason do not like Putin ... Someone would be in his place, for example, you, why if not, they would do better and more for the people of Russia, and maybe not ... Hitler was supported by the majority of the people in 1933, but then it turned into disappointment. Or maybe the other way around - few people understand right now that Putin, with all the shortcomings, did everything right in this situation ... I don’t understand much either, but I’m satisfied with the situation today if the whole situation is assessed as a whole, and not just through the presence of buckwheat in his zashashnik. Do not worry, history is sure to, sooner or later, put everything in its place! hi
                1. WIKI 24 March 2020 22: 06 New
                  • 3
                  • 2
                  +1
                  Quote: Finches
                  if you evaluate the whole situation as a whole, and not just through the presence of buckwheat in your zahashnik.

                  I do not understand you either. Why can you assess the situation by the number of cars, and another, "the presence of buckwheat" can not do this? And the problem of your contradictory statements is that Russia has created a state with the highest stratification of society in the world. Just don’t say that Medvedev did it. And you are one of the elements of this stratification, defending a position from your "bell tower".
            4. Roman12345678 24 March 2020 12: 34 New
              • 8
              • 4
              +4
              Under Peter 1 and Catherine 2, I didn’t have a single car in my yard ..
            5. Malyuta 24 March 2020 21: 12 New
              • 8
              • 5
              +3
              Quote: Finches
              Why stupidity? Then the main problem of the person was to scrape together a loaf of bread, and now he should have a good car in the courtyard, but his wife’s car should be dull ...

              Well, let’s say that in 1917 there were a lot of horses too, and that this testified to the high prosperity of people?
              1. Finches 24 March 2020 21: 44 New
                • 2
                • 3
                -1
                In 1917, there were already enough cars or, as they were called, motors ... laughing
            6. flicker 25 March 2020 00: 41 New
              • 2
              • 3
              -1
              Then the main problem of the person was to scrape together on a loaf of bread, and now to have a good car in the courtyard, but his wife’s car to be dull ...
              That's right, and about a loaf of bread ... and about the number of cars. Already everyone in the provinces knows what traffic jams are.
          2. Revival 24 March 2020 15: 10 New
            • 3
            • 4
            -1
            And if they can’t be compared with the very bottom of the very piece of th .., then there will be no noticeable success, and even by a millimeter
          3. karabas86 26 March 2020 21: 17 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            If the price of oil does not rise in a year, two 90s will seem like a paradise.
        2. Oleg Skvortsov 24 March 2020 07: 40 New
          • 38
          • 14
          +24
          Mr. Zyablitsov. Excuse me, what state flows are riveted to? While sucking the budget womb - you will sing any thieves' power
          1. Finches 24 March 2020 07: 52 New
            • 15
            • 38
            -23
            I would have served this womb for almost 30 years in the army laughing military pension called!
            1. Oleg Skvortsov 24 March 2020 08: 03 New
              • 39
              • 11
              +28
              It is clear that of those in the ranks we went to vote for the current government
              1. Finches 24 March 2020 08: 07 New
                • 11
                • 36
                -25
                You "wrestlers with a bloody regime" does not please! When I wrote before the last presidential election that the election wasn’t a go because I think it’s a stupid thing to do, I’ve been denied that it’s not right, to put it mildly, but here we are building ... Yes, I’ve built the elections, but part of the service only laughing
                1. neri73-r 24 March 2020 09: 17 New
                  • 8
                  • 30
                  -22
                  Quote: Finches
                  You "wrestlers with a bloody regime" does not please! When I wrote before the last presidential election that the election wasn’t a go because I think it’s a stupid thing to do, I’ve been denied that it’s not right, to put it mildly, but here we are building ... Yes, I’ve built the elections, but part of the service only laughing

                  Well, it was recently said to Roman, write about the technique, why about something as a layman. Ann no, everyone is struggling with rJim. I don’t even want to enter into a discussion. I almost agree with Zyablitsov. Another country has become and the people have become wiser, but not all. laughing If, as Roman writes, nothing changes except zeroing, then why did the collective West stand on its hind legs, now in China they accepted the same thing, were they silent? You need to look wider and not from the inside, trying on your own skin, but from above, globally, as a whole.
                  1. Victorio 24 March 2020 09: 52 New
                    • 5
                    • 14
                    -9
                    Quote: neri73-r
                    Well, it was recently said to Roman, write about the technique, why about something as a layman. Ann no everything is fighting with rEzhim. Even enter into a discussion

                    =====
                    ) to the place or not, but it was recalled from the classics: "I feel such personal dislike that I can’t eat!" ..
                  2. Stas157 24 March 2020 10: 14 New
                    • 23
                    • 12
                    +11
                    Quote: neri73-r
                    Well, it was said recently Roman, write about the technology ... Ann no, everyone struggles with rEzhim

                    Who says? Who do you think you are here ??

                    Such trolls who behave so rudely with respected authors need ban for life.
                    1. neri73-r 24 March 2020 22: 28 New
                      • 2
                      • 6
                      -4
                      Quote: Stas157
                      Quote: neri73-r
                      Well, it was said recently Roman, write about the technology ... Ann no, everyone struggles with rEzhim

                      Who says? Who do you think you are here ??

                      Such trolls who behave so rudely with respected authors need ban for life.

                      Wow, this bend is counted! That is, in your opinion, it is impossible to criticize anyone here, and especially reputable (without sorcasm) authors? If you don’t understand what I’m talking about, specify, but don’t write everyone down to the trolls at once! It is necessary to ban those who are only hoping for the pluses and are afraid to go into the section of the "general" line! hi and about the respected Roman, so I did not try to insult him. I liked his article about the Tu-2, but I did not like about the Constitution, both this and the previous one. And the dialogue, as it were, came from there. You can’t write articles about the people and the state offended by people who squandered everything and brought at the local level, which he saw, to the directives voting from above - how to vote and how not to, these people do not reflect reality and only spoil a good idea. I’ll find an article about what I’ll throw off the link to type for a long time and it won’t work out so well.
                  3. flicker 25 March 2020 00: 54 New
                    • 3
                    • 4
                    -1
                    then why the collective West reared
                    Well, why is it clear? laughing Because they worry about Roman.
                    Well, like, how will we (the West) support Putin when Roman suffers from him, suffers, and writes about his sufferings.
                    That is why we are under sanctions. West comes in front of Roman.
                    Or is Roman coming in the west?
                    Well, of course not. wink
                2. lopuhan2006 24 March 2020 09: 31 New
                  • 27
                  • 7
                  +20
                  I in the army talked about such people "how to put on my sword belt, I’m getting dumb and dumb!" ..... It is useless to argue, because the opinion of the soldiers on retirement is not subject to discussion. As a person, I’m sure you’re good, I can feel it straight, but with the perception of the world, alas ..... You are not taught to take a critical view of the environment and ask questions. Unfortunately, everything is held by people like you, and even by inert, stupid, and box-dependent ones. PYSY: would write about me like that, I would at least think, but for what? And by the way, I began to think about it after the second child and refusal of alcohol in any form)
                  1. neri73-r 24 March 2020 10: 07 New
                    • 2
                    • 15
                    -13
                    Quote: lopuhan2006
                    and refusal of alcohol in any form)

                    Well, you grabbed it !!! laughing Too or after an emergency. wassat
                  2. tihonmarine 24 March 2020 10: 41 New
                    • 5
                    • 3
                    +2
                    Quote: lopuhan2006
                    And by the way, I began to think about it after the second child and refusal of alcohol in any form.

                    An interesting conclusion. Alcohol must be taken a couple of times a month, but not more than 300 grams, and you need to drink alone so that no one bothers. This removes all the negativity, you sit to speculate, and the next day the state is excellent. After two weeks, I repeat again. In general, it turns out pretty well. (You need to drink only a quality product.)
                    1. Svarog 24 March 2020 15: 07 New
                      • 5
                      • 4
                      +1
                      Quote: tihonmarine
                      Quote: lopuhan2006
                      And by the way, I began to think about it after the second child and refusal of alcohol in any form.

                      An interesting conclusion. Alcohol must be taken a couple of times a month, but not more than 300 grams, and you need to drink alone so that no one bothers. This removes all the negativity, you sit to speculate, and the next day the state is excellent. After two weeks, I repeat again. In general, it turns out pretty well. (You need to drink only a quality product.)

                      I do just that laughing hi drinks
                    2. DED_peer_DED 24 March 2020 15: 26 New
                      • 2
                      • 2
                      0
                      Quote: tihonmarine
                      After two weeks, I repeat again. In general, it turns out pretty well. (You need to drink only a quality product.)

                      The cycle is straight :)
                      Just like my "law of conservation of energy." Two weeks .... moonshine from friends, or gifted cognac from them.
                      Now I am in the middle of "..... pause" :)
                    3. tihonmarine 24 March 2020 15: 30 New
                      • 0
                      • 1
                      -1
                      Quote: DED_peer_DED
                      Just like my "law of conservation of energy." Two weeks .... moonshine from friends, or gifted cognac from them.

                      Nobody gives cognac (there are no such rich friends), it is necessary to observe the cycle, but it’s better to do the hitchhiking yourself, I don’t count on friends, my product is more reliable. Manufacturing cycle, once every two months. Through a pressure cooker, three hours - 2 liters.
                  3. lopuhan2006 25 March 2020 08: 38 New
                    • 1
                    • 1
                    0
                    It’s strange to talk about the dangers of a drug - inference. Although I was the same. Probably you are not ripe yet.
                  4. tihonmarine 25 March 2020 10: 12 New
                    • 0
                    • 1
                    -1
                    Quote: lopuhan2006
                    It’s strange to talk about the dangers of a drug - inference. Although I was the same. Probably you are not ripe yet.

                    Sorry, but I'm already scary by modern standards (not yours personally) overripe. So that I live as Botkin told about his patient
                    Say, in the summer I get up at four and drink a glass of [tea] vodka; they give me a shake, I go around the fields. I’ll arrive home for about 6 1/2 hours, drink a glass of vodka and go around the estate, the farmyard, the horse yard and more. I’ll return home at 8 o’clock, drink a glass of vodka, refresh me and lay down to rest. I will get up at 11 o’clock, drink a glass of vodka, get down to 12 with the headman, a burmistr. At 12 o'clock I will drink a glass of vodka, dine and after dinner I lie down to rest. I’ll get up at 3 o’clock, drink a glass of vodka ... etc. "
                    Botkin:
                    "Let me ask you, how long have you been leading such a right lifestyle?"
                    Landowner:
                    “I retired after the capture of Warsaw, I settled on the estate, and so on. Since then, professor, tell me, what regime should I follow?” Botkin:
                    "Continue to lead your right lifestyle, it seems to you to benefit."
                  5. lopuhan2006 25 March 2020 11: 14 New
                    • 1
                    • 0
                    +1
                    That's right, which I am very happy.
            2. Finches 24 March 2020 21: 50 New
              • 2
              • 2
              0
              It’s true that I’m putting on my sword belt, so dumb and dumb ... what to do - the “bloody regime” cuts out the department responsible for critical thinking before the oath
              and implants in its place an implant that develops a constant desire to drink ...

              "And drank it immediately!"@
              laughing
              1. lopuhan2006 25 March 2020 14: 43 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                Drinking, drinking, drinking, thumping, mortgaging, everyone can continue with an epithet suitable for themselves) Or maybe take a slightly different angle to look at what surrounds yourself? Vodka and circuses!) Who does not drink, he will die healthy! I’m her, only on holidays a couple of times a week! I don’t trust the drinkers! (Because they see you as a monkey? And they’re clean!) And what a secret joy from the fact that someone has unleashed! After all, he again sank to my level of drinker, drinker, mortgage, and so on ......... This is a natural selection - it is useless to explain to them that their descendants will die out and die out if they do not learn contrary to the examples of their drinkers, smokers, and child smokers. And I want my children to say that thanks to me they did not do it!
              2. Finches 25 March 2020 19: 39 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                If you are a standing man, then they will say it for any scenario .... hi
              3. karabas86 26 March 2020 21: 24 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                In vain you are so - they don’t understand, they will prove with foam at the mouth - poozlooooooo. To each his own, here it is necessary to explain to the children, and adults are often useless.
        3. tihonmarine 24 March 2020 10: 32 New
          • 3
          • 3
          0
          Quote: Finches
          When, before the last presidential election, I wrote that there’s no go to the polls

          That's right, and then you were stigmatized, and now stigmatized. We don’t understand when it’s good for us, and when it’s bad. But in the end, it's still bad.
          1. Finches 24 March 2020 11: 04 New
            • 7
            • 6
            +1
            hi Russia cannot be understood in the mind, common arshin cannot be measured ... And only faith remains ... in a happy future! laughing
      2. Varyag71 24 March 2020 11: 45 New
        • 13
        • 6
        +7
        I have almost all of my subordinate military personnel retired, or reserve. Some seriously say that they respect Putin because he gave them a pension. This is complete insanity!
        1. DED_peer_DED 24 March 2020 15: 32 New
          • 7
          • 4
          +3
          Quote: Varyag71
          Some seriously say that they respect Putin because he gave them a pension.

          This is such a psychotype of people.
          They think, quite seriously, that if they say it out loud to others, then nothing bad will happen to them themselves.
          Those. speaking aloud about his retirement, this psychotype supposedly guarantees himself its presence and quality in the future, and thus persuades "fate".
  • balunn 24 March 2020 08: 23 New
    • 22
    • 6
    +16
    If you look through the prism of the security forces, I agree that under Putin there is a lot of work done. But besides the power structures, there are also citizens where they raised their retirement age, where the indexation of pensions lags behind price increases, etc., etc.
    1. Finches 24 March 2020 08: 26 New
      • 8
      • 29
      -21
      Everyone goes to the polls, elects the deputies, who then vote ... Go to your deputies and ask them why he voted for this reform? Democracy is the same !!
      1. balunn 24 March 2020 08: 45 New
        • 22
        • 5
        +17
        I don’t vote for edro. So this is not my deputy. I don’t know at all who picks them. May be you?
      2. Essex62 25 March 2020 07: 19 New
        • 5
        • 1
        +4
        You are, that ... comrade retirement. All impression spoiled. I read, drowned for you, run over, thought it was not the case of the comrade, but you take it and blurt out. Where, sorry to go, to whom? This I once went to the first secretary of the district committee and ensured a heart attack to one ministerial cord. He, hanging for his son with a disabled Afghan man, a gentleman of two orders, he squeezed out the laid flat.
        And these deputies go to do the loot, they do not see us point blank. In the best case, they will repeat the words of the guarantor that one must understand and enter into a position.
        1. Finches 25 March 2020 19: 42 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          If this is for me - then I am not a retirement, I am in stock! And, actually, it was sarcasm! hi
          1. Essex62 26 March 2020 07: 06 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Excuse me, not clearing. Usually on the move and very amused, as some comrades begin to desperately minus sarcastic posts. And yes, of course, we are in reserve.
  • Victor N 24 March 2020 09: 30 New
    • 4
    • 21
    -17
    Thank you, Eugene, for your sound position. But you have to go to the polls - Who but us?
    1. Stas157 24 March 2020 10: 20 New
      • 16
      • 8
      +8
      I saw here how the sisters pressed on poor Zyablicev, and after:
      Quote: Victor N
      Thank you, Eugene, for your sound position.
      1. tihonmarine 24 March 2020 18: 43 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Quote: Stas157
        I saw here how the sisters put pressure on poor Zyablicev

        Yes, they pressed him hard, just like a tractor.
    2. tihonmarine 24 March 2020 11: 42 New
      • 9
      • 3
      +6
      Quote: Victor N
      But you have to go to the polls - Who but us?

      Does that change anything? I recalled the new saying, "Scratcharsha Vlvl, we have two news, good, you were chosen again, bad, no one voted for you."
      1. Victor N 24 March 2020 15: 37 New
        • 2
        • 5
        -3
        If you want changes - at least try to influence personally.
    3. DED_peer_DED 24 March 2020 15: 35 New
      • 12
      • 3
      +9
      Quote: Victor N
      Who but us?



      But what about ...
  • Roman12345678 24 March 2020 12: 32 New
    • 12
    • 4
    +8
    Compare with the crises of the late 90s and now,
    Oil .. different price of oil ..

    even in 2014 there was more stupidity - you need to get away from dollar dependence, but this is not a quick and easy way.
    Still get off the oil needle, make a breakthrough, get up from your knees and other heresy that there is no time to swing ..
    These fables can be told only in rooms for the insane ..

    Russia went this way after the sanction of 2014 and has already lost about $ 50 billion, but has not slipped into the chaos of the economic crisis of the 90s, or do you persistently not notice it?
    Oil .. different price of oil ..
    We’ve already printed a small egg .. It turns out that we will live for some time only due to this small egg .. due to oil at 120 ..
    And the question is not even how much that little bag is enough ..
    The question is why this happens, and what follows ... and when it will be understood by those who stubbornly do not want to notice ..

    PS .. in the 90s there really was chaos ..
    For when the husband has flour, and the wife has eggs, then when they divorce, they will both be left without bread and pancakes .. Here, even the drunk Yeltsin can not be blamed for this, because the process with any guidance would be the same .. At least it takes time until enterprises and the economy will be rebuilt ..
    But the economic crisis, forcing the government to deprive people of pensions .. this chaos is difficult to cover with anything ..
    1. DED_peer_DED 24 March 2020 15: 41 New
      • 5
      • 2
      +3
      Quote: Roman12345678
      For when a husband has flour, and a wife has eggs,

      Here you mix the ingredients in places.
  • codetalker 24 March 2020 11: 36 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    Do you have the goal of life in Europe to ride something?
  • The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
  • Nicola I 24 March 2020 18: 30 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    The most compelling argument is that another wrote "stupidity." And why stupidity, which is false, evidence of stupidity is let the critic criticize. That is, the brains weren’t enough for the arguments, and to give out one word, stupidity, this speaks of their own stupidity.
  • Aerodrome 24 March 2020 07: 18 New
    • 33
    • 17
    +16
    Quote: Finches
    and I, personally in favor, let the GDP continue to steer!

    it’s good to apparently have your own “candle factory”, and not think about retirement, not think about being kicked out of work at 50, and you automatically become a pauper, don't have a sick child and don’t collect money on television for treatment ... then yes, do not care what kind of power. and your "strategist", moreover, left Russia alone, without allies.
    1. Finches 24 March 2020 07: 55 New
      • 17
      • 40
      -23
      Do you dream of lying under the Anglo-Saxons, if only the dollar stood? Personally, I-no. It’s a sin not to recall the battered aphorism of Alexander III about the only faithful allies of Russia ...
      1. Prometey 24 March 2020 09: 42 New
        • 20
        • 6
        +14
        Quote: Finches
        Do you dream of lying under the Anglo-Saxons, if only the dollar stood?

        Russia - a long time ago occupied country - by villains and crooks of all stripes. You can even ponder - under whom it is better to bend - under your own masters or foreign. Under foreign - not so offensive yet.
      2. Ivan Kolodin 24 March 2020 10: 08 New
        • 21
        • 6
        +15
        Take off your pink glasses, I don’t want to think that you are so naive and such stupid officers who do not know that for decades, or rather since 2002, most of the proceeds from the sale of hydrocarbons have been accumulated in US bonds, that most of the cabinet and this composition and the previous ones have a residence permit in Europe and the USA, they are trained there and live, their children if it does not bend under the Saxons then I do not know what is going on in your head ....
        You are very far from the people very .... Direct analogies from 1917 slip ...
      3. tihonmarine 24 March 2020 11: 59 New
        • 6
        • 2
        +4
        Quote: Finches
        ex not remember the hackneyed aphorism of Alexander III about the only faithful allies of Russia.

        Sin is certainly great, and in 1917, and in 1991, everything turned out the other way around, than by an aphorism.
      4. Marine engineer 24 March 2020 12: 10 New
        • 17
        • 3
        +14
        “Do you dream of lying under the Anglo-Saxons ...”

        Wake up, Russia is already a half-colony of Anglo-Saxons
      5. The comment was deleted.
        1. DED_peer_DED 24 March 2020 15: 53 New
          • 5
          • 5
          0
          Quote: Roman12345678
          If only this president took care of the people

          And not about his "people", but about the people of the country in which HE is the president.
        2. Finches 24 March 2020 21: 17 New
          • 6
          • 5
          +1
          I did not swear allegiance to Putin, dear man, but I served my homeland ... You will be rude to your wife! hi
    2. Victor N 24 March 2020 09: 35 New
      • 6
      • 19
      -13
      Lovely Italy, too, suddenly, was left without allies.
      But one wise Anglo-Saxon said: Britain has no permanent allies, but there are permanent interests, something like that. And Putin understands this well.
  • Stas157 24 March 2020 08: 06 New
    • 33
    • 13
    +20
    Quote: Finches
    let GDP continue to drive!

    Quote: Finches
    And through the prism of my life experience, I believe that socialism is more profitable for Russia - with the dictatorship of the Communist Party

    Zblitsov, you either remove the cross or put on your underpants. And it’s awkward to look at you like that.
    1. Finches 24 March 2020 08: 20 New
      • 10
      • 32
      -22
      I am for absolutism, the Secretary General’s absolutism I like more, but since today it’s impossible let the absolutism of the GDP be. So understandable?
      1. Stas157 24 March 2020 08: 55 New
        • 23
        • 10
        +13
        Quote: Finches
        I'm for absolutism Secretary General's absolutism ... So understandable?

        For the absolutism of the Secretary General of the CPSU Central Committee or the tsar who protects the interests of the oligarchs? Agree, these are still two different perspectives.
        1. Finches 24 March 2020 21: 21 New
          • 4
          • 3
          +1
          There are no prospects here! Capitalism is always a service to capital, even a king, even a pope ... Excuse me, but when will you all grow wiser .... The transition from one political and economic formation to the opposite - always through the Revolution! And not elections - it's like 2x2 !!!
          1. Stas157 24 March 2020 22: 37 New
            • 6
            • 6
            0
            Quote: Finches
            The transition from one political and economic formation to the opposite - always through the revolution! And not elections - it's like 2x2 !!!

            How, then, did they pass from the USSR to capitalism without revolutions, what usually scarers frighten with? The formations were clearly different! Or do you think not?

            And then, why is revolution bad? Since childhood, I celebrated the day of November 7 - the Red Day of the calendar. Celebration (note!) Of the Great October Revolution! And for you, it was like a day of mourning?
            1. Finches 25 March 2020 05: 41 New
              • 1
              • 3
              -2
              No, we have passed through even, legitimate elections ... Don’t write nonsense! There was a real coup d'etat, with the collapse of the system and the state, and simply its Yeltsin clique did not advertise, calling it a bourgeois revolution!
      2. DED_peer_DED 24 March 2020 15: 55 New
        • 4
        • 3
        +1
        Quote: Finches
        let there be an absolutism of GDP. So understandable?

        Which of them?
        1. Finches 24 March 2020 21: 21 New
          • 3
          • 2
          +1
          All in a row hi
      3. Sling cutter 26 March 2020 02: 27 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: Finches
        I am for absolutism, the Secretary General’s absolutism I like more, but since today it’s impossible let the absolutism of the GDP be. So understandable?

        Eugene, are you this ?! belay
    2. Revival 24 March 2020 15: 23 New
      • 7
      • 5
      +2
      Yes, he is simply for any power, if it is power.
      So accustomed, not to think, but to support. "I am a small man, a large giraffe knows better."
      Very accurately, the majority of the population of our country is described by the poem "the master will come, the master will judge us ...".
      1. Finches 24 March 2020 21: 23 New
        • 4
        • 2
        +2
        To judge a person, you need to know him, judge by his actions ... And personally! But you think that you are smarter than everyone and not for any power - I ask in such cases, but for what kind of power do you begin to draw the image of Jesus Christ to me, moreover, in your personal interpretation ... laughing
        1. Revival 24 March 2020 22: 58 New
          • 5
          • 3
          +2
          Your answer is empty water.
          And you have already been written that as a person you are most likely good, within the framework of interpersonal communication, and how “it’s a shame for a power” is doubtful.
          I'm sorry ...
          1. Finches 25 March 2020 05: 42 New
            • 2
            • 4
            -2
            That is, if against Putin - it means for the Power, and if for - then against! Explanatory logic ... laughing
  • Ingvar 72 24 March 2020 08: 08 New
    • 30
    • 7
    +23
    Quote: Finches
    but adequate solutions ..

    What kind? Lack of elementary anti-epidemic actions - an adequate solution? A personal example - two friends are at home with a temperature below 40, and with inflammation of the upper respiratory tract, but the ambulance categorically, without any tests, diagnosed ODS, without any tests. There are no masks in pharmacies from the word at all, but 9 boards were sent to Italy. Uncle’s wife, himself to his aunt.
    Quote: Finches
    but we have more reserves in the bins of the Motherland,

    Truth? 577 billion against 500 mld. The cost of production was forgotten to compare, the quality of oil, as well as the ability to increase production. In addition, I recommend comparing the depreciation of national currencies of the Russian Federation and the CA.
    Quote: Finches
    I believe that for Russia socialism is a more advantageous system - with the dictatorship of the Communist Party, but since it is not there, then let there be a dictatorship of GDP

    And the idea that you would return to the Communists again did not occur to you?
    1. Finches 24 March 2020 08: 23 New
      • 11
      • 26
      -15
      This is impossible, unfortunately. And we do not have communists from the word at all. There is a pink party of Zyuganov, disguised as a popular supporter, but who has sold these people a long time ago. There are no masks in pharmacies, is Putin the same to blame? However, for some reason I observe very few masked people. laughing
      1. Chervonny 24 March 2020 10: 22 New
        • 25
        • 2
        +23
        We do not need such renegades in the communist movement. Live in your little world "my hut with the edge" and scold pink Zyuganov, maybe it will make you feel better.
      2. Revival 24 March 2020 15: 27 New
        • 6
        • 4
        +2
        And who is to blame that there is no necessary basic means of protecting the population, and this is not the first day?
        And from the one who is to blame, he can and should ask either I or you will dismiss the Minister of Health, Industry?
        Or is it the president?
        Or the prime minister, who again reports to the president
      3. DED_peer_DED 24 March 2020 15: 59 New
        • 5
        • 4
        +1
        Quote: Finches
        And we do not have communists from the word at all.

        Normal and honest are filtered by the "system" already at the LOWEST level! The methods are different, I will not list, we have heard about them all ...
        By the way, a similar property of the "system" to filter people ALREADY at the very initial level, at the first stages of growth, and led to the fact that some write - "Putin has no alternatives ..." (C).
        This is right, because through the efforts of the "system" all normal people are destroyed already at the very first steps and it is easy for them to take it at the country level - NOTHING ...
    2. DED_peer_DED 24 March 2020 15: 57 New
      • 9
      • 4
      +5
      Quote: Ingvar 72
      but in Italy 9 boards sent

      Outdated information. Already 14 boards.
      And there in Italy - THEIR people.
      And here are ours.
      Feel the difference?
      1. Ingvar 72 24 March 2020 16: 10 New
        • 8
        • 1
        +7
        Quote: DED_peer_DED
        And there in Italy - THEIR people.
        And here are ours.
        Feel the difference?

        Of course, which I always say. Something is brewing in the country, and it is commonplace for them to oil the alternate aerodromes. yes
  • Malyuta 24 March 2020 08: 44 New
    • 31
    • 10
    +21
    Quote: Finches
    what’s most important - in Russia there are no queues for the dollar, no one is buying TVs ...

    I agree with Skomorokhov, you write nonsense that you are trying to cover with a fig leaf of imaginary achievements and successes.
    Do you know why there are no queues, but dollars and televisions, and because the POPULATION DOES NOT have MONEY NP PRODUCTS AND MEDICINES, and you mean dollars.
    Quote: Finches
    I flew this morning to Siberia, then returned to Europe,

    But you know that a simple person from Zamkadye can not only fly away, but cannot leave the settled zone due to lack of money.
    Have you heard about such a city of Vorkuta? There, people remained abandoned forever, they do not even have the opportunity to dump from there-nothing!
    Quote: Finches
    And through the prism of my life experience, I believe that for Russia socialism is a more advantageous system - with the dictatorship of the Communist Party, but since it is not there, then let there be a dictatorship of GDP ... And let’s see!

    After this pearl there is reason to doubt your adequacy, I do not affirm, but I doubt it. This is IMHO my personal subjective opinion.
    1. Revival 24 March 2020 15: 29 New
      • 10
      • 5
      +5
      He is from the same breed that will strangle for his penny, he has a military pension and he is for the power that they threw him a penny.
      And the fact that millions are in poverty, he is not cold and not hot, pension, here it is ...
  • Stirbjorn 24 March 2020 09: 32 New
    • 24
    • 2
    +22
    Quote: Finches
    Oil, but what and why, Putin went 100% none of us knows, but in our bins in the homeland there are more reserves than in Saudi Arabia and it’s not sweet for them from such a situation

    Why didn’t their real result of a fall in oil fall at all, and our ruble, backed up by reserves of the Motherland, flew down ?! Although not so long ago, when oil was growing, but the ruble was not, the Guarantor just explained this by the fact that it was not growing, because we finally untied it from the price of oil fellow
    1. Chervonny 24 March 2020 10: 27 New
      • 27
      • 2
      +25
      Quote: Stirbjorn
      Why didn’t their real result of a fall in oil fall at all, and our ruble, backed up by reserves of the Motherland, flew down?

      Because they are backward, and they do not have our government that would tie their real to oil. Oh how!
    2. Varyag71 24 March 2020 11: 52 New
      • 17
      • 4
      +13
      Guarantor of lies and hypocrisy
  • basmach 24 March 2020 09: 49 New
    • 27
    • 5
    +22
    Well, Zyablintsev, as always, there is no alternative to GDP,. But there is one thing but ... He likes to leave a loophole for himself, and suddenly what. In general, the "weather vane". Pupkin will come to power tomorrow with other ideas - and he will be in the forefront of his admirers. Here he is already advocating socialism. It is because of these that we lost the USSR.
    1. Chervonny 24 March 2020 10: 29 New
      • 25
      • 3
      +22
      Quote: basmach
      In general, the "weather vane". Pupkin will come to power tomorrow with other ideas - and he will be in the forefront of his fans

      Bravo! good
      Sorry I can not put you 10+ hi
      1. Finches 24 March 2020 11: 08 New
        • 4
        • 19
        -15
        So two brave communists, who sold the country together with Zyuganov in 1991, and then again threw all those who threw themselves in 1996, cooperated! You need to ask the moderators that it would be possible to put + or - 10 - it will immediately become fair and correct! laughing

        Only I have a principled position, but you don’t have it - just blah blah blah - We all die as one in the struggle for this ... And for 30 years everyone has been dying in the struggle for this! Just do not understand why in 1991 no one died, except for three clowns, though from another camp, during the coup ???
        1. Chervonny 24 March 2020 11: 23 New
          • 26
          • 6
          +20
          Zyablitsev, you have not mixed up anything about the 91 year? As far as I understand, at that time you already served in the army, and in October 93 the same.
          You have a good principled position, fifth. 30 years Zyablitsov, you spit in the face of people from this your position of principle.
          1. Finches 24 March 2020 11: 44 New
            • 4
            • 13
            -9
            Why do I spit - I was a sovereign servant to them and remained! Yes, the army, one might say then stayed away - Yazov was a respected man, but constrained by party and military discipline - it was necessary to shoot the Mechen and arrest Yeltsin, and not participate in the State Emergency Committee - and I , even a tiny screw of a military machine, I’m not taking responsibility off myself! But today there is no left-wing party in Russia capable of bringing back the socialist system — not to come to power, but to return the system! NO, not even parties, but forces - only clowns - oligarch Grudinin, Platoshkin - violent, but the most adequate among the left and renegade Zyuganov! That’s the problem ... So I’d better lie on the couch, and let Putin steer Russia for now! But how a person appears who is able to rally the people around him and with determination to go to the barricades - I'll see! But even 1,5 people will leave the barricades today ...
        2. Ingvar 72 24 March 2020 12: 06 New
          • 13
          • 5
          +8
          Quote: Finches
          So two brave communists, who sold the country together with Zyuganov in 1991, cooperated

          Zhenya, I'm a monarchist if that. wink But in this situation, I see no other way out for the country, as a rollback to the "red" system. Regarding Zyuganov, yes, he was a weather vane, but judging by his statement over the past years, and because he disappeared from the media screens, he took the right course. Why do some have the right to change their minds, and others you immediately write in renegades? Your beloved Putin is the same global shifter - he was a communist, he became a capitalist. Like many powerful. Grudinin says VERY sound things, Potapenko, Platoshkin, and even Strelkov.
          And camps do not need to scare, does not call now none to change the global system, the maximum discussion is about the symbiosis of the capitalist system with the socialist system. China has proven that this is possible.
          1. Finches 24 March 2020 12: 21 New
            • 2
            • 11
            -9
            hi Yes, am I against it, but how to do it? Take our democracy - you see, everyone will come on April 22, or when there will be amendments! But if no one comes to the ballot boxes, it will be a call from the authorities! After all, the elections are more interesting than anything - the number of people participating in them - this is their indicator of people's confidence in the government and the system! And because I am for Putin, and someone for Zyuganov ... does not solve absolutely anything! In 1986, it was necessary to go along the Chinese path ... And today, our red train has gone far into the beautiful!
            As for the monarchy — let the GDP remain for them — our kings were forever the richest landowners and owners! Eka is unseen!
            1. Ingvar 72 24 March 2020 12: 25 New
              • 15
              • 3
              +12
              Quote: Finches
              Take our democracy

              There is none, for serious amendments are already legitimate, even Pamfilova said. Yes, and not a "poll" does not comply with the law on the referendum.
              Quote: Finches
              let the GDP remain to them - our kings were forever the richest landowners and owners!

              He is not a king, he is a usurper. This is a Byzantine-style monarchy. What Byzantium finished I think you know. hi
              1. Finches 24 March 2020 12: 34 New
                • 4
                • 9
                -5
                And on the other hand - well, the deadline will be reset to zero - there will be elections in 2024 - there will be Putin's candidacy and, for example, Navalny - let everyone come to the polls and elect Navalny! What is the problem then? In the last election, the majority of those who voted voted for Putin, and I do not believe in a total fraud with votes I have repeatedly participated in election commissions! What a noise out of nothing to do! Personally, he suits me, someone is not - am I against it? But I didn’t even put a minus to those who disagree with me — and I’m both an alcoholic and a dumb tarpaulin boot! I do not care, but this is an indicator of opponents!
                1. Ingvar 72 24 March 2020 12: 46 New
                  • 10
                  • 3
                  +7
                  Quote: Finches
                  I do not believe in total fraud with voices

                  And do you believe in one hundred percent turnout and Putin in the Caucasus?
                  Quote: Finches
                  I do not care, but this is an indicator of opponents!

                  Eugene - I don’t give a damn about the minus, I don’t put them at all. But this is not an indicator of my agreement with my opponent. hi
                  1. Finches 24 March 2020 13: 22 New
                    • 2
                    • 5
                    -3
                    I won’t say for the Caucasus, but when he commanded 100 not 100 commanders, he sought 90% of military personnel and members of their families ... But on Kakazode - this is possible when the senior ordered!
        3. Den717 24 March 2020 15: 09 New
          • 5
          • 6
          -1
          Quote: Finches
          Only I have a principled position

          I read the branch. Colleague, I support you in the vast majority of positions. good The annoyance is that somehow a certain community of VO guests has formed, who generally hold an opposition position laughing (butter, nonetheless). In most cases, an unconstructive critical position is not occupied by adults not from deep beliefs in their knowledge of the subject, but as self-affirmation, inaccessible to everyday life. The formula works - "if they (rulers or who else) are bad and stupid, and I criticize them, then I am good and smart." At the same time, access to the anonymous sphere often occurs when this is impossible to obtain in real life. But you don’t really anger at them. For the most part, these are normal people working one way or another for the country. It's just that they were not very lucky somewhere ...
          1. Finches 24 March 2020 21: 30 New
            • 5
            • 3
            +2
            I just don’t get angry! I am interested in reading this - this is a certain section of reality - as an indicator of the presence of civil society! Criticism, constructive criticism of the authorities is right, but it’s stupid that, given the existing capitalism, we’ll choose Grudinin (an example), he will immediately take everything from the oligarchs and return them to the poor ... I’ve gotten down to shape, but people believe that! Which, however, is also not bad ... A person must have faith, at least in something! laughing
            1. Den717 24 March 2020 21: 52 New
              • 2
              • 2
              0
              Quote: Finches
              A person must have faith, at least in something!

              It would be nice to believe in reason and try to somehow delve deeper into the real state of the topics discussed.
    2. Revival 24 March 2020 15: 35 New
      • 10
      • 4
      +6
      Quite rightly, there is such a category of population that with tenderness supports any power and considers itself unworthy even to open its mouth to the wide.
      As an example, meetings of the people with the president receive meager pensions, grumble, but as soon as the meeting, oh! "We love you so much, health to you, you can touch, oh already a tear of happiness has flowed." And the most interesting thing is that they sincerely look like a rabbit in love.
      And then they go again get their 8500r. pensions and consider a trifle at the box office and so on until the end ...
      1. Finches 24 March 2020 21: 31 New
        • 3
        • 3
        0
        You were mistaken - I have 8 550 rubles - so I have something to tear the anus for! laughing
        1. Revival 24 March 2020 23: 05 New
          • 5
          • 4
          +1
          Well, in the continuation of our correspondence ...
          So where is your pride? 8500?
          Have you measured yourself on this?
          Another is also 8500r. How was the gift measured?
          Asked from whom (judging by your comments a rhetorical question)?
          Yes, there’s a lot more I can ask, write, but it’s empty and it’s not for me to write
          1. Finches 25 March 2020 05: 47 New
            • 1
            • 4
            -3
            You write nonsense, I nonsense to you and answer! Personally, I have a good, relatively retirement pension! Someone has 8500, but surrounded by no such acquaintances, relatives have a minimum of 16 with a penny, that's not enough, I agree ... But I will explain to you that nothing will change in the Kremlin by simply castling, then why change anything in tactical plan, if in the strategic everything remains the same, but it could get worse !?
            1. Sling cutter 26 March 2020 02: 48 New
              • 7
              • 1
              +6
              Quote: Finches
              Personally, I have a good, relatively retirement pension!

              Eugene, and if you adjust your pension to 8850, how do you write, what will you do? You and I are of the same generation and I want to tell you what, you are better than me and many others who are not yet retired at your age but they’re scrambling for work so you get it? You can understand that the pension is not paid by the gdp, but by a people who live a hard life, but are happy with everything, but there are no other people, well, people don’t want to go to a wooden mackentosh before they reach retirement, and in the meantime you will use the fruits of their labor. Explain to me why you are better than Colonel Shendakova or Lieutenant Colonel Barabash? I understand your position, you feel good and you don’t need to change anything, but I don’t perceive it. You used to say that you have a commander-in-chief and an order, but now you’re drowning for it, why, for yourself? But what about the rest? Eugene, I understand that if we sit down at the same table, drink, talk and most likely become friends, but I won’t be able to accept your position, you know? You can’t be apart from the people, be so kind as to pull a common strap. soldier
  • WIKI 24 March 2020 11: 43 New
    • 11
    • 1
    +10
    Quote: Finches
    we have more reserves in the bins of the Motherland than Saudi Arabia

    “Saudi Arabia’s international reserves amount to $ 500 billion, and the debt-to-GDP ratio of 25% gives the kingdom the opportunity to significantly increase borrowing and do it cheaply at low interest rates. While Russia doesn’t have such an opportunity to borrow money cheaply. Given that that their population is 33 million and ours is 140, it is not yet known how to estimate these reserves. " No one can produce oil as cheaply as Saudi Arabia: it only takes $ 2.80 to get a barrel, compared to about $ 16 for Exxon Mobil Corp. and more than $ 20 for Rosneft.
    1. Ingvar 72 24 March 2020 12: 07 New
      • 7
      • 0
      +7
      Quote: WIKI
      : only $ 2.80 required

      In my opinion 8, but globally it’s still several times less than ours.
      1. WIKI 24 March 2020 12: 18 New
        • 5
        • 1
        +4
        https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2020-03-09/oil-crash-saudi-arabia-s-price-war-worked-once-but-may-backfire
        1. Ingvar 72 24 March 2020 12: 28 New
          • 5
          • 0
          +5
          The data vary according to different sources, but not the point. All the same, many times cheaper than ours. hi
          1. WIKI 24 March 2020 12: 38 New
            • 5
            • 0
            +5
            The Saudis have another option for maintaining the budget, this is the devaluation of their currency, as Russia did. Then they will be $ 10 per barrel simply for joy. But, because they depend on imports by 60%, this will lead to higher prices for goods and inflation. Will they go for it?
            1. Ingvar 72 24 March 2020 12: 43 New
              • 10
              • 1
              +9
              Quote: WIKI
              Will they go for it?

              I don’t know, but it seems to me that they will not need such a move. They have fewer people, almost the same amount of money, their cost is many times lower. We used to be blown away with such initial data. But not so long ago, Medvedev announced that we were able to get away from raw material dependence. Damn, wherever you look, some defective managers, what’s above, what’s on the ground. But how to report! good
              1. WIKI 24 March 2020 12: 58 New
                • 10
                • 1
                +9
                Saratov! Poor Saratov. Just arrived from the regional hospital yesterday. A cup, spoon, mug, toilet paper, soap - all your own. Upon discharge, the surgeon openly suggested "thank him."
                1. Ingvar 72 24 March 2020 13: 04 New
                  • 9
                  • 0
                  +9
                  Quote: WIKI
                  Upon discharge, the surgeon openly suggested "thank him."

                  The year before last, the mother was operated on oncology, a fee of thanks of 10 tr My mother’s roommate gave 8 tr, so they told her in plain text - not enough! laughing
                  1. WIKI 24 March 2020 13: 09 New
                    • 7
                    • 1
                    +6
                    Some have a patron king, others have batons with epaulets, and others have a scalpel. Where can a poor pensioner lean against?
                  2. DED_peer_DED 24 March 2020 16: 11 New
                    • 8
                    • 2
                    +6
                    Quote: Ingvar 72
                    My mother’s roommate gave 8 tr, so they told her in plain text - not enough!

                    It is necessary to make 2 entrances in each hospital: the "Hospital" and the "Funeral Services Bureau".
                    Near each door to hang up prices with prices.
                    And in the middle between the doors, there’s a big poster: “Choose, or you will lose.”
    2. Finches 24 March 2020 21: 31 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      hi I won’t argue ... It's all the same useless!
  • DED_peer_DED 24 March 2020 15: 15 New
    • 6
    • 3
    +3
    But most importantly, there are no queues for the dollar in Russia, no one is buying up TVs ... People are wise!

    Wise ... He buys cereals, salt, canned food and toilet paper.
    You are wiser here. That's how it is with me, with a salary of 8 thousand rubles. (part-time), it's time for dollars and TVs to run.
    But the "wisdom" .... I can even borrow.
  • Arlen 24 March 2020 06: 38 New
    • 34
    • 12
    +22
    Will we now amend the constitution under each president? The next president will correct the constitution for himself. And these changes will be endless, until we return the sch to the path of Soviet power.
    1. Svarog 24 March 2020 07: 29 New
      • 29
      • 12
      +17
      Quote: Arlen
      Will we now amend the constitution under each president?

      Apparently, yes .. we decided to make the rules of the road from the Constitution ..
      1. AK1972 24 March 2020 09: 12 New
        • 22
        • 3
        +19
        Quote: Svarog
        Apparently, yes .. we decided to make the rules of the road from the Constitution ..

        A man asks the saleswoman of the kiosk "Soyuzpachat"
        - Is there a constitution today?
        1. DED_peer_DED 24 March 2020 16: 15 New
          • 5
          • 2
          +3
          Quote: AK1972
          A man asks the saleswoman of the kiosk "Soyuzpachat"
          - Is there a constitution today?

          "There is no truth, they sold Russia. There remains Labor for 2 kopecks ..." (C)
          Plusanul frantically ... :)
      2. Revival 24 March 2020 15: 38 New
        • 2
        • 2
        0
        It is necessary to organize the release in the form of a "scroll", so it’s more convenient to read and emphasizes the real value
  • Svarog 24 March 2020 07: 24 New
    • 24
    • 10
    +14
    I looked. The dollar is almost 80, the euro is almost 86. The Central Bank of the Russian Federation is doing its job. Nabiullina should be given the Hero of Labor of Russia.

    There are all the heroes .. and everyone is working like bees ..
    1. Cat Kuzya 24 March 2020 08: 00 New
      • 32
      • 8
      +24
      Putin forever! Long live Putin, our eternal president!
    2. Chervonny 24 March 2020 10: 36 New
      • 19
      • 2
      +17
      It seems that the Central Bank is not Russian at all, but belongs to some aliens from the planet Saturn.
  • depressant 24 March 2020 09: 28 New
    • 18
    • 4
    +14
    Colleague Pessimist 22, support.
    The last year somehow highlighted especially clearly the division of society into a narrow class of bloodsuckers and an extensive class of extinct donors. The latter finally understood everything and became very dark --- strongly and very noticeably. To prevent the sudden consolidation of salt, gloomy on the principle of crystalline, thrown into its supersaturated solution, the bloodsucker class, sensing the danger of its precipitation, hastened to consolidate the current state of affairs in the Constitution, simultaneously introducing laws that allow the use of armed force against those who are not satisfied.
    A year ago, our society was an indefinite, amorphous mass, and everyone believed that he had every opportunity - even to become president! Remember all the last election - who was nominated. Almost housewives. And now --- no, no! Know your place, donor of economic and political blood. The structure of society has finally acquired a finished look. The aristocracy from the plow was fenced off from the bulk of the people by a constitutional barrier and legislatively turned off the elevators.
    1. Chervonny 24 March 2020 10: 39 New
      • 18
      • 3
      +15
      Quote: depressant
      The last year somehow highlighted especially clearly the division of society into a narrow class of bloodsuckers and an extensive class of extinct donors

      Now they will approve amendments to the constitution by voting, and there will still be roofing felts. Following can really come serfdom.
      1. Varyag71 24 March 2020 12: 05 New
        • 7
        • 3
        +4
        Therefore, they are now promoting the Russian Orthodox Church. As before, it will be on guard.
  • DMB 75 24 March 2020 05: 25 New
    • 47
    • 17
    +30
    Putin needs the changes to the Constitution in order to somehow preserve power after 2024, when his presidential powers cease. There were simply no other internal grounds for changing the Constitution. There were no economic, political, legal reasons for such a radical decision. The functions of the State Council would be incomprehensible. This is a central issue. The amendments, apparently, should strengthen the president’s sole authority.
    Elbasy will be, but for what ?. Putin is trying to ensure personal security. And this means that he is trying to maintain the maximum amount of power - it doesn’t matter in which package, and by what regulatory and administrative changes.
    1. Uncle lee 24 March 2020 05: 36 New
      • 49
      • 16
      +33
      That's all ! And no magic ....
      1. bessmertniy 24 March 2020 05: 47 New
        • 26
        • 13
        +13
        Field of Miracles in the Country of Fools. And this is the lot of a great people with a multi-million history! wassat
      2. The leader of the Redskins 24 March 2020 07: 17 New
        • 15
        • 9
        +6
        That’s why I’m not going to this “visibility” in a month! I have already buried so many "gold" in such "miracles" that I feel full of Pinocchio! laughing
        1. Ingvar 72 24 March 2020 08: 14 New
          • 23
          • 6
          +17
          Quote: Leader of the Redskins
          That’s why I’m not going to this “visibility” in a month!

          After Putin signed these amendments, it makes no sense to go to this “poll”. Before that I wanted to go, but after I found out about the conditions for the voting, I realized that this was nothing more than a farce paid by taxpayers. hi
          1. Boris55 24 March 2020 09: 08 New
            • 6
            • 27
            -21
            Quote: Leader of the Redskins
            That’s why I’m not going to this “visibility” in a month!
            Quote: Ingvar 72
            After Putin signed these amendments, it makes no sense to go to this “poll”.

            How, he already signed them? belay

            Are you happy with the Constitution written by the State Department and are you against changing anything in it? I’m embarrassed to ask, what oligarch do you have for feeding?
            1. Chervonny 24 March 2020 10: 45 New
              • 21
              • 3
              +18
              Boris, your beloved government has been living under the State Department’s constitution for decades, and now it’s not a new constitution that’s being adopted, but just amendments to the constitution written by the State Department.
            2. Svarog 24 March 2020 10: 49 New
              • 11
              • 6
              +5
              Quote: Boris55
              Are you happy with the Constitution written by the State Department and are you against changing anything in it? I’m embarrassed to ask, what oligarch do you have for feeding?

              Boris, they lived 30 years under the Constitution of the State Department .. and the funny thing is that today's amendments do not make this Constitution pro-Russian .. and it’s even funnier that the previous Constitution was often not respected .. and in this connection a logical question arises .. And actually what difference does it make when our people are robbing us or Western ones .. in any case, it turns out to be a people of the same kind .. with whom both these and those only shear .. So it’s ridiculous to call for patriotism in such a situation ..
            3. Ingvar 72 24 March 2020 11: 53 New
              • 10
              • 2
              +8
              Quote: Boris55
              How, he already signed them?

              MOSCOW, Mar 14 - RIA News. President Vladimir Putin signed into law on constitutional amendments. https://ria.ru/20200314/1568601156.html
              Quote: Boris55
              Are you satisfied with the Constitution written by the State Department and are you against changing anything in it?

              No, it does not suit me, but it needs to be changed for the better, and not for the worse.
              1. Boris55 25 March 2020 07: 28 New
                • 0
                • 3
                -3
                Quote: Ingvar 72
                President Vladimir Putin Signs Constitution Amendment Law

                Yes you are right. According to the Constitution, he was obliged to sign this law.

                "...If based on the results of the all-Russian vote, amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation will support more than half citizens who will take part in it, the changes provided for by the Law on Amendment to the Constitution of the Russian Federation in chapters 3–8 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, will come into force... "http://www.kremlin.ru/acts/news/62988

                That is what I wrote above. Our approval is necessary in order for the amendments to take effect immediately.

                Quote: Ingvar 72
                No, it does not suit me, but it needs to be changed for the better, and not for the worse.

                It’s a pity that you didn’t indicate which amendment (s) you are comfortable with (s).
            4. Revival 24 March 2020 15: 42 New
              • 2
              • 3
              -1
              Well, again, will you push the imaginary idea of ​​peremptory palling of international laws over ours, without citing evidence and examples?
          2. Victor N 24 March 2020 09: 44 New
            • 2
            • 14
            -12
            All responsible citizens will go and support, do not hesitate.
          3. Chervonny 24 March 2020 10: 43 New
            • 12
            • 3
            +9
            Quote: Ingvar 72
            Before that I wanted to go

            I’ll go if there really will be a turnout of 60% after summing up, for 70% or vice versa, I don’t remember how they said on the site a couple of weeks ago that I won’t have more than my foot in the elections.
            1. Leshy1975 24 March 2020 11: 12 New
              • 14
              • 2
              +12
              Quote: Red
              Quote: Ingvar 72
              Before that I wanted to go

              I’ll go if there really will be a turnout of 60% after summing up, for 70% or vice versa, I don’t remember how they said on the site a couple of weeks ago that I won’t have more than my foot in the elections.

              No! Here in the fall, on a single voting day, you will definitely have to go! To the elections, where there are observers, where there are opposition candidates who are personally interested in taking the seats of United Russia. Look, in the Moscow City Duma, the composition has changed after the summer confrontation and the subsequent vote. And so the updated Moscow City Duma recently invited VV Kvachkov to take part in the committee meeting, which is clear that he did not wag, but spoke sharply - this is still some kind of tribune.
              I personally will not go to the vote on the Constitution. There is no control whatsoever; on the contrary, everything has been done to remove it. Therefore, why will I participate in this circus?

              PS In the media there is information about a possible postponement of the vote, due to the virus, to June.
              1. Chervonny 24 March 2020 11: 26 New
                • 15
                • 1
                +14
                Maybe you are right...
      3. DMB 75 24 March 2020 08: 33 New
        • 20
        • 9
        +11
        Exactly kreks, peks, feks. Sleight of hand and no fraud! Then Kiselyov and Solovyov will convincingly tell that we ourselves wanted this.
    2. Same lech 24 March 2020 05: 48 New
      • 15
      • 19
      -4
      There was simply no other internal reason for amending the Constitution.

      There is a reason ... for example, article 15, paragraph 4 ... it subordinates our state to Anglo-Saxon laws, they directly affect our domestic policy .... which I do not accept in principle.
      1. Revival 24 March 2020 15: 45 New
        • 3
        • 2
        +1
        Give an example of a law, a convention, which has become mandatory for us, and even without our voluntary signing and ratification of the State Duma, simply upon adoption abroad.
        Otherwise, this problem is a "windmill".
    3. Banshee 24 March 2020 07: 02 New
      • 27
      • 7
      +20
      Quote: DMB 75
      Elbasy will be obtained, but for what?


      And what for Nazarbayev? All for the same.
  • Lannan Shi 24 March 2020 05: 27 New
    • 53
    • 19
    +34
    Article 93, paragraph 1.

    In fact, it is completely unconstitutional. Because violates article 19. Granting equal rights to all citizens of the Russian Federation. In the new edition, some citizens are somewhat more citizen. Division into the first grade and draft stock.
    .
    Article 671. This is the MOST where the ancestors who transmitted to us ideals and faith in God, the protection of historical truth and children as the most important priority of the spiritual policy of the state.

    But Buddhists, of whom there are not so few in the Russian Federation, completely deny the concept of God. Like atheists. The constitution is not for them? Or are they not for the constitution? And I, as an atheist, must urgently believe? Though in Allah, even in Christ, even in Cthulhu, it does not matter in whom, but to believe? And if I did not believe, then I turn into an unconstitutional element? Again, a direct violation of article 19.
    Nah. Edits are not so easy. The constitution is gradually beginning to be redrawn under a class-theocratic society. Forward to the past. To good bars, priests and rods. Yeah.
    1. HaByxoDaBHocep 24 March 2020 07: 05 New
      • 18
      • 9
      +9
      For Great Cthulhu fat like)
      1. depressant 24 March 2020 09: 38 New
        • 9
        • 3
        +6
        Cthulhu, he is a bloodsucker from the Pripyat Zone. I read and reread books about stalkers. Writers are great! A fighting detachment of political analysis of our reality. There, Russia anonymously acts as a Zone. By all indications. The case of the Strugatsky Teachers is alive!
    2. balunn 24 March 2020 08: 34 New
      • 9
      • 2
      +7
      to which priests? to the inquisitor !!!! laughing
    3. last astronaut 24 March 2020 15: 13 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      ,, In fact, it is completely unconstitutional. Because violates article 19. Granting equal rights to all citizens of the Russian Federation. ,,

      And equal rights have never been and never will be, because all people are different, and laws should be written under the majority.

      A woman and a man are initially not equal. A woman must give birth to children, this is not given to men. Infringement means.

      And here I am also proving everything to everyone that in boxing and other martial arts women must fight with men, for they are equal. But nobody is listening to me. no laughing
      1. DED_peer_DED 24 March 2020 16: 26 New
        • 2
        • 2
        0
        Quote: last astronaut
        A woman must give birth to children, this is not given to men. Infringement means.

        This "misunderstanding" is already being worked out in the "Developed Democratic Countries", the goods taken into account ...
    4. DED_peer_DED 24 March 2020 16: 24 New
      • 2
      • 4
      -2
      Quote: Lannan Shi
      And I, as an atheist, must urgently believe?

      In the Great and Horrible God - PU!
      This is just about him, amendments.
  • Sahalinets 24 March 2020 05: 27 New
    • 41
    • 10
    +31
    Everything is pretty simple. There is a gang of people robbing the country. And it is extremely important for them to maintain the status quo, for the new godfather will bring his friends, very hungry. That's all.
    1. Malyuta 24 March 2020 09: 05 New
      • 13
      • 7
      +6
      Quote: Sahalinets
      Everything is pretty simple. There is a gang of people robbing the country. And it is extremely important for them to maintain the status quo, for the new godfather will bring his friends, very hungry. That's all.

      Quote: Sahalinets
      Everything is pretty simple. There is a gang of people robbing the country. And it is extremely important for them to maintain the status quo, for the new godfather will bring his friends, very hungry. That's all.

      Everything is much worse for them; it is a matter of physical existence.
  • Private89 24 March 2020 05: 28 New
    • 36
    • 9
    +27
    Change of faces is not able to change anything until the class in power changes. No one has canceled the class struggle! They are and we are! And we have completely different interests. And we will never agree. Their task is to be enriched at our expense, ours will be freed from exploitation. There can be no compromise between a cancerous tumor and a healthy body.
    1. Ross xnumx 24 March 2020 05: 41 New
      • 40
      • 8
      +32
      Quote: Private 89
      There can be no compromise between a cancerous tumor and a healthy body.

      good
      I do not understand, to be honest, because of what such a noise.

      Novel! The noise here is only because people are amazed at how quickly anti-people decisions are made by those elected to power. People rightly wonder why the amendments are put to the vote by the package? Some people simply don’t know why there was no substitute for one of the 80 million potential candidates in the country, and what is its “historical role” and “incomparable personality”, if the whole vertical of power built by him and his circle does not recognize any dogma, does not adhere to any postulates . The expression of the will of the people is not checked in a “fictitious vote”, but in a referendum.
      And then the family situation: “How do we spend our money that dad drank?”
      It's time to finish this booth. All thoughts:
      Quote: Pessimist22
      “When robbery becomes the lifestyle of a group of people living together in society, over time they create a legal system that legalizes it and glorifies its moral code.”

      Quote: Lannan Shi
      In fact, it is completely unconstitutional. Because violates article 19. Granting equal rights to all citizens of the Russian Federation. In the new edition, some citizens are somewhat more citizen. Division into the first grade and draft stock.

      Quote: DMB 75
      Elbasy will be, but for what ?. Putin is trying to ensure personal security.

      Sincere and correct, because they do not have personal self-interest, unlike amendments.
      1. Prometey 24 March 2020 09: 48 New
        • 5
        • 1
        +4
        Quote: ROSS 42
        Some simply don’t know why in the country of 80 million potential candidates there was no replacement

        This is almost the same as with football - why in a country with 140 million people 11 players cannot be found.
        1. DED_peer_DED 24 March 2020 16: 30 New
          • 2
          • 2
          0
          Quote: Prometey
          why in a country with 140 million people can’t find 11 players.

          The same thing.
          Because sport, like all the best, is for the elite.
          Notice, not for the BEST, but for the elite.
    2. bessmertniy 24 March 2020 05: 51 New
      • 21
      • 9
      +12
      Neither the Constitution nor the Criminal Code are laws. With corrections, with amendments or without changes - they do not care. And that in that case, they should throw beads before them by our popular vote. negative
      1. Arlen 24 March 2020 06: 42 New
        • 20
        • 7
        +13
        Quote: bessmertniy
        Neither the Constitution nor the Criminal Code are laws. With corrections, with amendments or without changes - they do not care.

        They need legitimacy. They don’t give a damn about everything else. The main thing is legitimacy!
        1. bessmertniy 24 March 2020 07: 31 New
          • 14
          • 6
          +8
          And they don’t need an aspen stake !? To these ghouls.!? what
    3. Malyuta 24 March 2020 09: 09 New
      • 13
      • 4
      +9
      Quote: Private 89
      Change of faces is not able to change anything until the class in power changes. No one has canceled the class struggle!

      I agree with you, just try to characterize the current ruling class and give it a definition. Do you understand that such a monster has not yet existed in the history of the world, so the classical formula of the class struggle most likely will not work.
  • codetalker 24 March 2020 05: 29 New
    • 13
    • 9
    +4
    Quintessential Opus:
    I don’t understand, to be honest, because of what such a noise

    The possibility of introducing such amendments is the result of hard work for 20 years. This is the word that the next one will come and with the same “ease” will change.
    1. bessmertniy 24 March 2020 05: 57 New
      • 19
      • 7
      +12
      Our constitutional rights remain rights, but the state cannot provide them. Why such a constitution, which cannot reliably provide work for every adult in our country! no At the same time, shtrebreher or migrants from abroad are imported, and citizens are raised the retirement age, while not providing reliable employment! stop
      1. Ross xnumx 24 March 2020 06: 28 New
        • 28
        • 6
        +22
        Quote: bessmertniy
        and citizens are raising their retirement age, while not providing reliable employment!

        Citizens of Russia are offered an official monthly minimum wage of 12 rubles. It is in a country with a temperate continental climate and negative average annual temperature. Although the right solution in this situation is the hourly minimum wage. I know people who work for this minimum wage for 130 hours a day without lunch, and this is with the approved 10-hour work week.
        1. Same lech 24 March 2020 06: 44 New
          • 14
          • 3
          +11
          I know people who work for this minimum wage for 10 hours a day without lunch, and this is with the approved 40-hour work week.

          Of course, this is not normal and unfair ... and injustice in relation to its citizens is one of the reasons for the collapse of the states ... no laws here will help to resist such a state in the long run.
        2. Lannan Shi 24 March 2020 07: 13 New
          • 25
          • 8
          +17
          Quote: ROSS 42
          I know people who work for this minimum wage for 10 hours a day without lunch

          And this is another trick of our "social" state. So in the world the minimum hourly. And there is no point in pushing people out for shifts of 12-14 hours. But here is the month. And that many have to plow per month, not 160 hours, but 250-300 .... It’s politically incorrect to notice such trifles.
          1. The leader of the Redskins 24 March 2020 08: 14 New
            • 15
            • 2
            +13
            I have less than 200 hours, even in the "holiday" months it does not work!) laughing
        3. Sotskiy 24 March 2020 07: 41 New
          • 19
          • 5
          +14
          Quote: ROSS 42
          Citizens of Russia are offered an official monthly minimum wage of 12 rubles. It is in a country with a temperate continental climate and negative average annual temperature.

          The minimum wage is 12 rubles, this is how much! It can be said everyone will become a millionaire! True, with certain components laughing Namely: the dollar - 60 kopecks., Bread - 20 kopecks., Gasoline - 40 kopecks., Planted for speculation, well, then you understand ... wink By the way, who remembers what it is - a penny? laughing
          But those people who built their personal “communism” for themselves in the capitalist system believe that 12130 pe for social norms is a great achievement of the current government in the conditions of stable ruble volatility, “free” pricing and the absence of its own industrial base.
          And yes, maybe they are sincerely perplexed why they were able to build "communism with a capitalist face" for themselves, and the rest cannot "lift their ass off the couch" lol .
        4. Prometey 24 March 2020 10: 12 New
          • 11
          • 1
          +10
          Quote: ROSS 42
          I know people who work for this minimum wage for 10 hours a day without lunch, and this is with the approved 40-hour work week.

          And I know. My wife was looking for a job, got a temporary job. Payment - 750 rubles. per shift - 10 hours on feet with two 15 minutes. breaks. I went down 3 times and I forbade her - it’s better to live in poverty than to humiliate oneself for such a penny. I still cannot understand how to humiliate my own citizens and treat them like cattle.
          1. Revival 24 March 2020 15: 51 New
            • 2
            • 2
            0
            Only in one case, if that’s how you initially feel about them
    2. Arlen 24 March 2020 06: 45 New
      • 18
      • 10
      +8
      Quote: codetalker
      the next one will come and change it with the same “ease”.

      Will definitely change. Each heir / successor will change the constitution for themselves, a precedent is created.
      1. codetalker 24 March 2020 11: 31 New
        • 2
        • 8
        -6
        Of course ... no, of course, Putin didn’t redraw the constitution in 2001
  • Same lech 24 March 2020 05: 36 New
    • 22
    • 7
    +15
    Immunity after termination of powers, appointment

    Such an amendment does not suit me at all.
    Strongly against this ... if the president commits an official crime directed against the interests of the state, country and people, he must undoubtedly answer for this in full measure ... there can be no immunity for him in principle ...
    Further, article 15, paragraph 4, if it has not been amended in favor of our state, I will vote against such amendments.
    This (article 15, paragraph 4) subordinates us to vague norms. This is a concession to the people who ruled the country in the 1990s, and they are now very influential in power.
    1. Ross xnumx 24 March 2020 06: 36 New
      • 29
      • 7
      +22
      Quote: The same Lech
      Strongly against it ...

      good
      Indeed, ex-presidents in countries live and travel around the world without state support, and this “braid” will have to be protected (grave) for budget money after death.
      The most vile and base human trait when they become bold behind the backs of guards.
      After that, I doubt the biographical fact when the lieutenant colonel - director of the club (where did it come from?) Dispersed the crowd with a pistol ... Wow, I was not afraid. And in his own country, where support is above 76%, and the middle class - above 70%, he is afraid to marry a loaf of bread. How do everyone else live?
      Attached: once they fell into power and pulled veins from people to the last.
      1. DED_peer_DED 24 March 2020 16: 35 New
        • 2
        • 2
        0
        Putin is immortal. The constitution is eternal.
    2. Svarog 24 March 2020 07: 34 New
      • 29
      • 8
      +21
      Quote: The same Lech
      Such an amendment does not suit me at all.
      Strongly against this ... if the president commits an official crime directed against the interests of the state, country and people, he must undoubtedly answer for this in full measure ... there can be no immunity for him in principle ...

      This point characterizes Putin as a whole .. It seems to me that there are not many presidents in the world who, like that, brazenly and cynically remake the main law of the country for themselves ..
      1. Chervonny 24 March 2020 10: 54 New
        • 16
        • 2
        +14
        Quote: Svarog
        This item generally characterizes Putin ..

        Not only him, but also his advisers and his entire team, together with his domestic policies and economies
      2. DED_peer_DED 24 March 2020 16: 36 New
        • 4
        • 2
        +2
        Quote: Svarog
        it seems to me that there are not many presidents in the world who are brazen and cynical for themselves

        In hot Africa, there are many examples of this ...
        1. Svarog 24 March 2020 16: 38 New
          • 3
          • 4
          -1
          Quote: DED_peer_DED
          Quote: Svarog
          it seems to me that there are not many presidents in the world who are brazen and cynical for themselves

          In hot Africa, there are many examples of this ...

          That's it .. but it’s not a desire to consider Russia as Africa .. but in fact they are leading us there ..
  • Rust 24 March 2020 05: 40 New
    • 26
    • 13
    +13
    Thank you Roman! Wonderfully laid out. Great work. I tried to read the amendments, but could not, wimp. Thanks to your analysis, I was finally convinced that we do not need such changes.
    1. Essex62 24 March 2020 06: 58 New
      • 18
      • 7
      +11
      And yours, my, their opinion does not concern those who portrayed this constitution. They came to the conclusion that they saddled the spineless, in the mass, people and consolidate the conquests of the 93rd. The following amendments, apparently, will be even more radical and concrete. This is enough for Putin, too, with the following growth to a class society, fixed by the basic law of a 12-hour working day, and then all the charms on the list.
  • Scipio 24 March 2020 05: 47 New
    • 11
    • 6
    +5
    For whom is the new Constitution? Government: for you family, for you our beloved people live and try our best!
  • Van 16 24 March 2020 05: 50 New
    • 21
    • 9
    +12
    Seek someone profitable. And we get the answer - it’s primarily profitable for the current government. Specifically - Putin V.V.
    Everything else is a smoke screen.
    1. Same lech 24 March 2020 05: 55 New
      • 17
      • 6
      +11
      Specifically - Putin V.V.

      Putin is just a man ... he does not last forever ... sooner or later he will leave Olympus to power .. but those who are behind him are the most dangerous for the people ... what it takes their heads to usurp power is unknown .. The internal political cuisine of the Kremlin is hidden from the eyes of the people and it is very difficult to say what processes are going on there.
      1. Van 16 24 March 2020 07: 44 New
        • 12
        • 4
        +8
        It is truth too. Unfortunately, there are few people around the president who, to put it mildly, inspire confidence. hi
        1. Victor N 24 March 2020 10: 00 New
          • 4
          • 10
          -6
          Do you know the environment of the President so well? Or theoretically?
          1. Van 16 24 March 2020 10: 30 New
            • 4
            • 3
            +1
            You might think you don’t know this environment ..
          2. Ivan Kolodin 24 March 2020 11: 47 New
            • 5
            • 5
            0
            We have only Chubais, and the Rotenberg brothers are enough ... To understand that to understand who is who ...
          3. Ingvar 72 24 March 2020 12: 12 New
            • 6
            • 2
            +4
            Quote: Victor N
            Do you know the environment of the President so well? Or theoretically?

            Yes, good enough to understand that they are thieves. For their property is ten times more expensive than they officially earned in their entire lives.
      2. DED_peer_DED 24 March 2020 16: 39 New
        • 2
        • 2
        0
        Kremlin cuisine is hidden from the eyes of the people and it’s very difficult to say what kind of processes are going on there.

        They say there are many voids in that hill.
  • Mikhail Drabkin 24 March 2020 05: 52 New
    • 5
    • 19
    -14
    With all due respect to the labor and time spent, Roman - every bast in a row!
    You read the comments and remember the classics: discussions of “pique vests”!

    And the materials of the emigrant government of the acquaintance of Latvia to me - they considered themselves entitled and experts on the current agenda of the LSSR.

    If everything is predetermined - why goat button accordion?
    -----
    And all health, wash their hands, count and remember Moidodyr (Chukovsky, 1920-21), well, at least this:

    ".... It is necessary, it is necessary to wash
    In the mornings and evenings
    And unclean
    Chimney sweeps -
    Shame and disgrace!
    Shame and disgrace!

    Long live the fragrant soap
    And a fluffy towel
    And tooth powder
    And a thick scallop!

    Let’s wash, splash,
    Swimming, diving, tumbling
    In the tub, in the trough, in the tub,
    In a river, in a brook, in the ocean, -
    Both in the bath and in the bath,
    Anytime and anywhere -
    Eternal glory to the water! ... "
  • samarin1969 24 March 2020 06: 03 New
    • 29
    • 6
    +23
    The Central Bank’s capabilities are great - the management of gold reserves, a “firm” course, bank licenses, emission ... And the fact that this body continues to be declared “independent” makes it simply an independent branch of government.
    EZ Nabiullina’s ability to influence the country is no less than that of Nicholas II. Why is this “independence" of monetary power from the chosen one?

    And the clones of the new government are also surprising. Instead of putting things in order in the constitutional bodies, they invented a bunch of "independents": Sledkom, Rosguard, State Council, "ombudsmen", "advice on ...", a bunch of useless "grew ... supervision". On the ground, a double set of "leather cabinets" - the administration and "tips" ...
    With all the shortcomings of the tsarist and Soviet officials, there were few of them, and they didn’t particularly interfere. Now - the "civil service" is both the leading "branch of the economy" and the "big family" with a tireless reproductive function. laughing
  • Valerych 24 March 2020 06: 06 New
    • 30
    • 7
    +23
    The constitutional coup, in fact, has already been completed.
    22.04.2020/XNUMX/XNUMX formally "ustakanite" this action and all.
    People continue to hold for idiots.

    CEC Chairwoman Ella Pamfilova said that in fact, amendments to the Constitution have already been adopted and are legitimate, and the upcoming April 22 vote is just Putin’s “political will,” which is “worthy of great respect."

    “This law has already been adopted, amendments have been adopted, this process itself is legitimate. And only you can be very respectful that the president did not stop there, and his political will and desire is to hear in this case the opinion of the people that is not stipulated by the current Constitution. Additionally, [this] is a key phrase, he went for it, it is worthy of great respect, ”Pamfilova said.
    1. bessmertniy 24 March 2020 07: 09 New
      • 20
      • 5
      +15
      What is the whole point of voting if everything is decided for us. At least they saved money, which will be promoted to this circus. repeat
      1. Snail N9 24 March 2020 08: 19 New
        • 14
        • 2
        +12
        A list of “amendments to the Constitution” is published on the State Services website — an old and a new version and what has changed is added
        https://gosuslugi-online.ru/popravki-v-konstitucziyu-rf-2020-spisok-izmenenij/

  • The comment was deleted.
    1. Valerych 24 March 2020 06: 16 New
      • 35
      • 15
      +20
      And in my opinion, the author wrote everything correctly. It can be seen that a man thinks soberly and sees that the anti-people government promotes its selfish interests, blowing dust in the eyes of the people.
      Putin from a liberal is deformed into a usurper.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Ross xnumx 24 March 2020 06: 43 New
      • 27
      • 7
      +20
      Quote: Nitarius
      and to the author of the article there is a desire to solder the TIME for INFRASCIA and alarmism! !

      Mister "clone", to put it bluntly. It is not familiar to you that the original declared publicly that the COURT determines the guilt? Put you and your kind at 17 and no better to come up with.
    4. Banshee 24 March 2020 07: 13 New
      • 35
      • 10
      +25
      Quote: Nitarius
      the author is a liberal of pure water .. essentially a traitor to the MOTHERLAND! who ever ran this article here? question to administrators ..


      We have launched. Ktov doesn’t just have a head and thinks not with television, Mr. Nikolich, who has not mastered the Russian language. 6 mistakes ... Well, for a real "patriot" this is normal, I already wrote once that 146% of a patriot should be as stupid and illiterate as possible.

      Quote: Nitarius
      Who allowed the traitor to write an article here? the author is a lying parasite .... that climbs out who really writes articles here .... Custom-made article of pure water ..


      Calmer ... I have a monitor on the other side that you spit on ...

      The author can do what you do not know how to read and think. And in general, to each his own - I think you vote.

      Quote: Nitarius
      Changes to the constitution of the case IMPORTANT about voting for it MUST BE!


      "Nopezano to the rutting Chilec people!"

      Quote: Nitarius
      to the author of the article there is a desire to CONSOLIDATE TIME for INFRASCIA and alarmism! !


      Yeah, you are more careful with your desires ... Agree. Four-point chlorpromazine has not been canceled in some cases.
      1. Bashkirkhan 24 March 2020 07: 56 New
        • 5
        • 11
        -6
        Quote: Banshee
        I already wrote once that 146% of patriots should be as stupid and illiterate as possible.

        Because if a person is not stupid and competent, he will not be a patriot of Russia. And his children will live in Europe. Because the country has no future.
        1. DED_peer_DED 24 March 2020 16: 47 New
          • 2
          • 2
          0
          Quote: Bashkirkhan
          Because if a person is not stupid and competent, he will not be a patriot of Russia.

          You do not confuse horseradish with radish.
          Or do you "say Russia, I mean - Putin"?
          Yes, then write. What do you twist?
          1. Bashkirkhan 24 March 2020 19: 25 New
            • 3
            • 2
            +1
            With the terrible property stratification in Russia, as it is now, the country has no future. The same NATO today does not make sense to send its soldiers into our snowy wastelands. It is much more efficient to plant a puppet government that will work for its owner, but at the same time it is tough to keep a fooled population in check. No matter what, songs about external enemies, rising from their knees, spiritual bonds, the fifth column, endless parades, fireworks and salutes in honor of past victories, etc. Including that it is necessary to compress the rolls and tighten the belts. The main thing is that the country would not develop, but would remain in place as an oil well, or mine. And Russia's pseudo-elite on the Cote d'Azur, Sardinia, the Italian Riviera and other points where they hold private villas, will calmly use assets in the amount of 1 to 3 trillion dollars withdrawn outside Russia.
    5. Stas157 24 March 2020 08: 24 New
      • 21
      • 6
      +15
      Quote: Nitarius
      the author is a liberal of pure water .. essentially a traitor to the MOTHERLAND! who ever ran this article here? question to administrators .. Who allowed the traitor to write an article here? the author is false parasite .... that’s really who writes the articles here .... The article is ordered pure water .. Constitutional changes it is IMPORTANT to vote for it MANDATORY! and the author of the article has a desire to solder for NON-DEFENSE and alarmism! !

      Nikolaitch, go on to thump.
      1. DED_peer_DED 24 March 2020 16: 50 New
        • 1
        • 3
        -2
        Quote: Stas157

        Nikolaitch, go on to thump.

    6. The comment was deleted.
      1. Revival 24 March 2020 16: 07 New
        • 0
        • 2
        -2
        That's what happens when you write a comment and inadvertently sat on a hedgehog
    7. Varyag71 24 March 2020 12: 38 New
      • 2
      • 3
      -1
      It’s worthless to write about the guarantor
    8. DED_peer_DED 24 March 2020 16: 43 New
      • 0
      • 3
      -3
      Quote: Nitarius
      TIME to solder for VISCILITY

      Are you in your "specialty" so good at this issue?
      Or an amateur?
    9. AAK
      AAK 24 March 2020 21: 09 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Colleague, abuse in the text of words or sentences consisting of CAPITAL letters is one of the unconditional signs of serious ill health in the head, get better ...
  • The comment was deleted.
    1. Uncle lee 24 March 2020 06: 32 New
      • 32
      • 4
      +28
      We can write, read ... And think?
      1. Banshee 24 March 2020 07: 14 New
        • 26
        • 6
        +20
        It is individual. If you look at some saliva-splashing into the monitor, not everyone can.
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. DED_peer_DED 24 March 2020 16: 51 New
          • 0
          • 3
          -3
          Quote: Banshee
          not everyone knows how.

          Thinking is work.
  • Bastinda 24 March 2020 06: 21 New
    • 11
    • 3
    +8
    “All animals are equal. But some animals are more equal than others "(Eng." All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others ")
  • The comment was deleted.
  • Paul Siebert 24 March 2020 06: 25 New
    • 25
    • 6
    +19
    Quote: DMB 75
    And this means that he is trying to maintain the maximum amount of power - no matter in which package

    Yes DMB 75 - it is.
    But it’s not even important for Putin to stay in power.
    "Problem 2024" is about the current Oligarchy, who does not want to break away from the udder of mother Russia.
    "Sucked, sucked and will suck!" - the motto of the current economic elite.
    As for the Constitution, it’s a smoke screen.
    "Look who benefits!" - said the ancients. And some of us are watching. And they even see.
    I did not see the ballot for the referendum in the eye. But, I think - it will be very concise:
    "Do you support the amendments?
    WELL NO
    Underline whatever applicable."
    In my opinion, this document should consist of two points.
    Least.
    The first point is about amendments, since it’s already so hot for our government.
    The second is about trusting the policy of the head of state and the possibility of his nomination for the next term.
    So - it would be honest.
    Not like dancing with tambourines based on the "Tereshkova flight". wink
  • bandabas 24 March 2020 06: 38 New
    • 13
    • 4
    +9
    As for the promises, I recall the phrase of Fagot from “The Master and Margarita” in the circus- “And he simply lied! Congratulations to you, citizen, lied!”
  • The comment was deleted.
  • parusnik 24 March 2020 07: 00 New
    • 22
    • 4
    +18
    Normal historical process ... laughing From the beginning, they removed the candidate against all, then they introduced a 5% barrier, now in essence they offer the replacement of clans ... one sea otter changes the next, after the death of their representative ... wink
    1. Svarog 24 March 2020 07: 39 New
      • 25
      • 9
      +16
      Quote: parusnik
      From the beginning, they removed the candidate against all, then they introduced a 5% barrier, now they basically offer the replacement of clans ..

      And then they will generally remove the vote and transfer the power by inheritance ..
    2. Revival 24 March 2020 16: 09 New
      • 2
      • 2
      0
      An important milestone in this process was the abolition of the minimum turnout.
      So that the maze certainly was no way out
    3. DED_peer_DED 24 March 2020 16: 54 New
      • 1
      • 2
      -1
      one sea otter changes the next, after the death of their representative ...

      "For reasons beyond the control of the people ..." (C)
  • Whowhy 24 March 2020 07: 13 New
    • 12
    • 8
    +4
    I liked article 93. According to it, right now V. Putin should be "removed from office" for violating the Constitution with his "pension reform" (Article 55, part 2 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation: "2. Laws repealing the Russian Federation should not be passed or derogating the rights and freedoms of man and citizen ") and even after the end of the presidency" is deprived of immunity. I would add to it that "persons caught" not only lose their posts but also get a life-time ban on holding any posts in the public sector.
    But I didn’t like the tone of the article: “boring”, “not interesting” - I get the impression that this is a hidden call to “ignore” this vote. We must be aware that everyone who “votes with their feet” will actually vote “FOR”.
  • The comment was deleted.
    1. kartalovkolya 24 March 2020 08: 43 New
      • 5
      • 16
      -11
      I agree with you and I want to add something from myself; reading this liberal howl, I remembered the words of my long-dead father that if we were praised, our sworn enemies, then things are going "worse than to," and if they scold "for nothing" it means "comrades are on the right path "! That's exactly how the Russian liberals howled at Stolypin’s reforms, and what did we expect from their descendants and successors of anti-Russian affairs? !!!
      1. Buldozer 24 March 2020 09: 05 New
        • 3
        • 10
        -7
        Quote: kartalovkolya
        I remembered the words of my long-dead father that we were praised, our sworn enemies, then things are going "worse than to," and if they scold "for nothing," it means "comrades are on the right path!"

        I adhere to this tactic too, and it concerns Russia in particular!
        Quote: kartalovkolya
        That's exactly how the Russian liberals howled at Stolypin’s reforms, and what did we expect from their descendants and successors of anti-Russian affairs? !!!

        What a great example from our history and there are many .. And there is nothing to add! hi
      2. Varyag71 24 March 2020 12: 47 New
        • 9
        • 3
        +6
        Did the late father say anything about raising his retirement age? About the distribution of heroes and generals to anyone horrible? And about the middle class did not forget to share?
        1. kartalovkolya 25 March 2020 07: 52 New
          • 2
          • 2
          0
          What "liberal traitors" really pierces the eyes? Well, we "shook" this barrel of liberal shit, now the stink has risen to heaven! But as the popular wisdom says: "... the dogs bark, the wind blows ..."!
          1. Varyag71 25 March 2020 09: 07 New
            • 3
            • 4
            -1
            Kolya, are you from Urengoy by any chance? Your guarantor and your entire Kremlin are a whole liberal clan. I come from the USSR! And when SMERSH is created again and real people come to lead the country, you will crawl and merge each other in shit.
    2. AUL
      AUL 24 March 2020 08: 45 New
      • 20
      • 5
      +15
      Quote: Buldozer
      But what about the main change that the Russian legislation has a prerogative of international law ..?

      Do you really think that this is the main change (albeit very important)? The whole garden is set to zero for a specific character! And, even kill me, I do not see any logic in the fact that the amendment of the Constitution (the matter, in general, everyday life changes) should result in the termination of the presidency and not, for example, the results of privatization!
  • zsdk 24 March 2020 07: 39 New
    • 19
    • 7
    +12
    For whom is the new constitution? Yes, for that and those who want to rule forever without bearing any responsibility for their rule. And all the other amendments are just profanity.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • Gennady Korsunov 24 March 2020 07: 49 New
    • 17
    • 7
    +10
    Over time, all O.P.G. concepts and rules changed. The time has come for our O. P. G. to change which rules, but the concepts remain the same !! Skhodnyak of all levels (except bulls) spent! They have already approved everything, but with the bulls, as they say: We’ll see, they don’t moo and they don’t calve !!
  • Maks1995 24 March 2020 07: 52 New
    • 19
    • 4
    +15
    The worst part is that they will still vote as they should.
    They will add zeroes if something happens.
    And the virus will only help to hide it ....

    There will be life-long presidents, senators, judges, Families. All that is already now, but will be already legislative
  • The comment was deleted.
    1. AK1972 24 March 2020 09: 33 New
      • 3
      • 2
      +1
      Quote: Buldozer
      The more on the Internet we get (literally) opinions against the new Constitution, the more likely it will be accepted by a majority of votes ..

      This probability was 100% at the stage of discussion of the so-called. amendments at the very top, when we could not even dream of such a thing. Ms. Pamfilova will provide, otherwise there was no need to fence a garden.
  • Azis 24 March 2020 08: 05 New
    • 12
    • 5
    +7
    The "federal territories" introduced by Part 1 are not yet clear. x.NUMX. Further in the text, there is no concept of “federal territories” anywhere, only a footnote on the federal law (which is not yet available).
    Part 2 of the same article, which seems to be necessary, is correct in terms of the ban on the alienation of part of the territory, but it leaves not just a loophole, but a hole in the form of "delimitation, demarcation, re-marking of the state border" (for the northern territories of the Japanese?).
    new x.NUMX in paragraphs 5-7 actually duplicates the current article 7 with the exception of the concepts of "state pensions, benefits and other guarantees".
    And, in general, the limited restrictions associated with the “opening and availability of accounts (deposits), the storage of cash and valuables in foreign banks located outside the territory of the Russian Federation” for state / municipal services are not clear, i.e. are any other property, real estate, except cash, encouraged abroad?
    1. Rusvelt 24 March 2020 09: 41 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      Part 2 of the same article, which seems to be necessary, is correct in terms of the ban on the alienation of part of the territory, but it leaves not just a loophole, but a hole in the form of "delimitation, demarcation, re-marking of the state border"

      This is to account for the expansion of borders and the entry of future territories into Russia, which is inevitable!
      1. Revival 24 March 2020 16: 13 New
        • 3
        • 3
        0
        What does the extension have to do with it, the ban on alienation does not interfere with the expansion, so the loophole concerns the options for alienation
    2. Freeman 24 March 2020 10: 33 New
      • 6
      • 3
      +3
      Azis Today, 08:05 AM
      The “federal territories” introduced by part 1 of article 67 are not yet clear. Further in the text, there is no concept of “federal territories” anywhere, only a footnote on the federal law (which is not yet available).


      I can assume that in the future, territories with mineral reserves can be allocated from the lands of the constituent entities of the federation, to the so-called "federal territories". We get, as it were, the “oprichnina” and “zemstvo”, as in the time of Ivan the Terrible.
      Again, “specially authorized persons” can be put on these territories “on the board” (“feeding”).
      - Well, what is not a "village with ascribed (" serfs ").
      IMHO.
      1. Ivan Kolodin 24 March 2020 11: 56 New
        • 3
        • 3
        0
        That’s how it is worth interpreting this norm, it is a reserve for the future law where all lands will be assigned to the right people and all within the framework of the constitution ....
  • Old partisan 24 March 2020 08: 08 New
    • 7
    • 3
    +4
    It is enough to read and compare the constitution of 93goda and the current draft.
    In fact, the constitution is the Basic Law having the primacy of the law, and not a subordinate act obeying federal laws.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • Boris55 24 March 2020 08: 22 New
    • 7
    • 22
    -15
    Quote: R. Skomorokhov
    First one. About the state system. In principle, nothing of such vital importance, I don’t know how we lived without ... only the Russian language - the only common language. But somehow they lived here.

    Do you understand that language is one of the elements of the formation of a single state?
    Do you understand why in the Baltic States and Ukraine they are fighting the Russian language?


    Quote: R. Skomorokhov
    In general, all this is there in laws and codes, why it is necessary to introduce it into the Constitution is difficult to understand. The same controversial lawmaking as the first pile.

    There are laws and codes, but I well remember how at the beginning of the 2 thousandths, under the Ivanovo Defense Ministry, we didn’t add a single penny to our pension for a year, and inflation was good.

    Quote: R. Skomorokhov
    The third. President and state apparatus. Well, yes, everything is pretty useful there. President and senior officials. This doesn’t concern us at all,

    How does this not apply? We form the Duma, which appoints the prime minister and ministers. We, through the deputies, appoint the highest authority, which determines the future of our country.

    The redistribution of power from the president to the parliament guarantees in the future against tyranny of power both of the legislative (Duma) and of the executive (presidential).

    ps
    Call constitutional amendments a bunch - this is disrespect for the Constitution of the Russian Federation, for Russia and its citizens. Your message is not to vote on the Constitution (is it possible to vote for a bunch) and leave everything in it as the State Department wrote, very frank. They earned $ 30. Voting will show which of us is right.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. Boris55 24 March 2020 08: 58 New
        • 5
        • 16
        -11
        Quote: last astronaut
        Do not toss beads in front of pigs.

        Our people are as they are and there will be no other. And democrats, and liberals, and undecided - these are all our citizens. Management is an informational process. Not expressing your point of view, this means letting our enemies have us all as they please - they won’t wait!
    2. AK1972 24 March 2020 09: 38 New
      • 7
      • 2
      +5
      Quote: Boris55
      We form the Duma, which appoints the prime minister and ministers. We, through the deputies, appoint the highest authority, which determines the future of our country.

      If it’s not difficult, give an example when the Duma that we “elected” wrapped up the candidacy of the prime minister proposed by the president or some minister.
      1. Boris55 24 March 2020 10: 18 New
        • 2
        • 11
        -9
        Quote: AK1972
        when the "chosen" by us Duma wrapped up Prime Minister

        And now she will not consider the proposed candidate, but appoint. Do you understand the difference?

        Why the Duma did not wrap up the proposed candidacy - because the confrontation of the legislative (Duma) and executive (presidential) authorities will lead to the collapse of Russia. The responsible president will not propose a deliberate candidate, but an irresponsible one - will not be able to.
        1. AK1972 24 March 2020 11: 29 New
          • 3
          • 2
          +1
          Quote: Boris55
          And now she will not consider the proposed candidate, but appoint. Do you understand the difference?

          I understand, but I do not believe. The Duma, as before, will vote unanimously for the candidacy launched from the top.
    3. Varyag71 24 March 2020 12: 50 New
      • 3
      • 2
      +1
      And pensions, salaries of ordinary people is the respect of the authorities to them?
    4. Revival 24 March 2020 16: 21 New
      • 3
      • 3
      0
      It's funny ..
      1. "There are laws and codes, but I remember very well how at the beginning of the 2 thousandths, under Ivanovo, we didn’t add a single penny to our pension for a year, and inflation be healthy."
      And what prevents ignoring the constitution, as before laws and codes?
      Have you asked a lot from Ivanov’s Defense Ministry for not complying with the law?
      2. "How does this not apply? We form the Duma, which appoints the prime minister and ministers. We, through deputies, appoint the highest authority that determines the future of our country."
      We form a thought, are we?
      It is formed by "146%", which we do not define.
      3. "ps
      To call the amendments to the Constitution a heap is disrespect for the Constitution of the Russian Federation, for Russia and its citizens. "
      You write it to the top so they don’t read.
      Respect for the constitution?
      Causes? Does she guarantee something?
    5. DED_peer_DED 24 March 2020 17: 06 New
      • 1
      • 2
      -1
      Quote: Boris55
      We form the Duma, which appoints the prime minister and ministers. We, through the deputies, appoint the highest authority, which determines the future of our country.

      "Blessed is he who believes, warmth in the world!" “Woe from Wit” A. S. Griboedov
  • Gardamir 24 March 2020 09: 05 New
    • 15
    • 7
    +8
    I said that I would not go to a vote on the Constitution. But everything is much funnier. The constitution was adopted on April 22, the Kremlin simply deigns to find out the opinion of the people, although it’s a coronovirus, so the poll may not be possible.
    Unless Putin really wants to put a bomb on Lenin’s grave.
    1. Boris55 24 March 2020 09: 19 New
      • 4
      • 14
      -10
      Quote: Gardamir
      The Kremlin simply deigns to know the opinion of the people

      No, that's not why. Our opinion is necessary for the amendments to the Constitution to take effect immediately, without waiting for the change of the Duma and the president.
      1. Hypatius 24 March 2020 21: 31 New
        • 2
        • 2
        0
        In our opinion, do not care, extras are needed for "Western partners." Amendments to the 1993 draft have already been adopted; Ella the ogre is not lying. For plebeians (individuals) even a free day was promised a free pie. Citizens of the USSR have nothing to do there. Turnout is an complicity in a crime.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • Brigadier 24 March 2020 09: 11 New
    • 16
    • 6
    +10
    " Okay, Putin is happy with those who have started all this. We know them, heroes both in the literal and figurative sense of the word. Timchenko, Rotenberg, Sechin, Miller, Deripaska and so on. "

    You can’t say better. Well, let these figures vote for Putin’s amendments for Putin as well.

    And I will vote AGAINST !!!
    1. Boris55 24 March 2020 09: 21 New
      • 5
      • 23
      -18
      Quote: Brigadier
      And I will vote AGAINST !!!

      That is, you will vote to maintain the State Department Constitution? Well then, my friend, change the avataruk - the one in the bathhouse or a cross or underpants laughing
      1. Round Smesharik 24 March 2020 10: 02 New
        • 6
        • 18
        -12
        Quote: Boris55
        That is, you will vote to maintain the State Department Constitution?

        It doesn’t matter against which to vote .. If only against Russia .. hi
      2. Whowhy 24 March 2020 10: 51 New
        • 5
        • 5
        0
        And tell us, my friend, at least one State Department item of the current Constitution.
      3. Varyag71 24 March 2020 12: 51 New
        • 5
        • 3
        +2
        That is, after the adoption of the amendments, the State Duma will stop standing clapping its hands on the Americans?
      4. Revival 24 March 2020 16: 51 New
        • 1
        • 2
        -1
        Yes, you slipped to the templates, did not expect.
        Or nothing to say?
    2. DED_peer_DED 24 March 2020 17: 10 New
      • 1
      • 3
      -2
      Quote: Brigadier
      And I will vote AGAINST !!!

      I hope to personally verify this by unfolding a bag of seeds and seeing the bird you put in the right place.
  • Xnumx vis 24 March 2020 09: 11 New
    • 4
    • 11
    -7
    Bah, all faces familiar !!!! wassatTest: From the first three lines, identify the writer !!! laughing
  • Alexander I 24 March 2020 09: 12 New
    • 5
    • 9
    -4
    Yes, calm down, amendments to the constitution do not cancel the presidential election.
  • aglet 24 March 2020 09: 17 New
    • 8
    • 3
    +5
    Quote: Finches
    Go to your deputies and ask them why he voted for this reform?

    and who is your deputy who voted for you such a pension? oh yes, you don’t go to the polls, your commander in chief feeds you so well, so why vote, even for
  • aglet 24 March 2020 09: 21 New
    • 2
    • 3
    -1
    Quote: Boris55
    Do you understand that language is one of the elements of the formation of a single state?
    Do you understand why in the Baltic States and Ukraine they are fighting the Russian language?

    I understand perfectly, but we are not in the Baltic states and not in Ukraine, but at home. and here attacks on the Russian language are already serious, but in the current text of the constitution this is not written
  • aglet 24 March 2020 09: 23 New
    • 5
    • 3
    +2
    Quote: Boris55
    There are laws and codes, but I remember very well how at the beginning of the 2 thousandths, under Ivanovo, we didn’t add a single penny to our pension for a year, and inflation be healthy

    then who was the president, do not remind?
  • aglet 24 March 2020 09: 27 New
    • 10
    • 5
    +5
    Quote: Boris55
    We form the Duma, which appoints the prime minister and ministers. We, through deputies, appoint the highest authority that determines the future of our country

    Are you a member of the cooperative "lake"? no? then your statements are ridiculous, I’ll open your eyes to you, we cannot influence anything above, and the new constitution will not help you in this
  • The comment was deleted.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • aglet 24 March 2020 09: 32 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    Quote: Boris55
    Our people are as they are and there will be no other. And democrats, and liberals, and undecided - these are all our citizens

    but we are higher than this, they are all ... well, they are Dartanyans and everything is in white! well, you understand, colleague.
  • TAMBU 24 March 2020 09: 36 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Stormy and prolonged applause, turning into a standing ovation ... curtain ... =)
  • aglet 24 March 2020 09: 40 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Quote: bandabas
    phrase of the bassoon from "The Master and Margarita" in the circus

    the bassoon did not play in the circus, read the classics, it will be more interesting than the constitution, and will bring more benefits
  • Victorio 24 March 2020 09: 41 New
    • 3
    • 5
    -2
    Unpromising for 99% of the population.
    ====
    already counted ?! but in general, to the author, opinions / beliefs / methods of upholding may be different, except for this.
  • Andrei Nikolaevich 24 March 2020 09: 42 New
    • 8
    • 0
    +8
    I respect any opinion, any person regarding this article. The article is difficult, ambiguous. I agree that the higher echelons of power need updating. I agree that the GDP has also begun to be slightly entered and he has acquired lordly habits. The GDP of the beginning of 2000 and the current one are different people. But I’m afraid and didn’t forget how we all applauded Gorbachev, were angry with the Communist Party, how Moscow and Muscovites rode on, joyfully seeing the drunken, reformer, Yeltsin, and throughout the country, the army eked out a miserable existence .. All this was. Do not deny. This is our story, our shame and our choice. But at the same time, I am against chaos and mess. We laugh at the prickly neighbors, but it would be time for us to draw conclusions and not turn our homeland into a dirty, servile maidan. Just don’t quarrel, people. Maybe we’ll break through. Just let's think HEAD. HEART, we already ,, thought ,,
    1. DED_peer_DED 24 March 2020 17: 21 New
      • 2
      • 2
      0
      Quote: Andrey Nikolaevich
      But I am afraid and have not forgotten how we all

      About "everything", please be careful.
      Doctors call this diagnosis "Delusions of grandeur" when the patient speaks from himself - "We."
      1. Andrei Nikolaevich 24 March 2020 20: 34 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Oh well. ,, majority ,, - will you be satisfied?)
  • Rusvelt 24 March 2020 09: 43 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    Part 2 of the same article, which seems to be necessary, is correct in terms of the ban on the alienation of part of the territory, but it leaves not just a loophole, but a hole in the form of "delimitation, demarcation, re-marking of the state border"

    This is to take into account the expansion of borders and the entry of future territories into Russia, which is inevitable! [/ Quote]
  • vit670 24 March 2020 09: 44 New
    • 9
    • 2
    +7
    Quote: Buldozer
    But what about the main change that the Russian legislation has a prerogative of international law ..?
    The same Hague court ordered Russia to pay Khodor 50 lard, although according to our laws he is a thief and a murderer .. I think because of this amendment all the cheese goes and howling in the world

    All these amendments are nonsense in vegetable oil! It all depends on the power of the state! Try to offend the USA! And a poor, plundered Russia is kicked by anyone who is lazy from the Baltic to Ukraine ... Ukraine does not want to pay us 3 lard debt and does not pay. Instead, we dumped 3 lard for them .. And try to twitch - they will arrest property abroad, of which there are many! Yes, they will squeeze our billionaires who also have property and money there. But they in power in Russia will do as they are told from Washington as nice. And no amendments to the Constitution will help! How the Molotov-Ribentrop Pact did not help Stalin ... All these are empty pieces of paper ... Learn from the USA - they wanted to spit on all these Constitutions and treaties!
    1. Andrei Nikolaevich 24 March 2020 20: 36 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      You're right. The agreement is equal. Violate, the strongest.