The RAS announced the launch date of the first Russian spacecraft to the moon

The RAS announced the launch date of the first Russian spacecraft to the moon

The Russian lunar program will resume in 2021, when the first spacecraft will be launched on a satellite of the earth after a 45-year hiatus. This was announced by the head of the department of nuclear planetology of the Institute for Space Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences Igor Mitrofanov at a meeting of the RAS Council on Space.


According to Mitrofanov, the launch of a domestic spacecraft to the moon is scheduled for October 1, 2021, and a reserve date is October 30, 2021. For landing, two points were chosen in the region of the south pole. The point north of the Boguslavsky crater is named as the main point, and south-west of the Manzini crater as the reserve point.

The name of our device "Luna-25" continues the numbering of domestic lunar missions of the last century

- said Mitrofanov.

It is planned that after landing, the device will conduct soil sampling, its research, and also study the polar exosphere of the earth's satellite. As the scientist explained, there were no landings before in the pole region, all Soviet and American vehicles made landings at temperate latitudes or in the equator area. The apparatuses of other countries that managed to reach the satellite of the earth also landed there.

As previously reported, under the lunar mission program, Russia plans to send the Luna-2024 orbital station to the Moon in 26, and the Luna-2025 landing station in 27. The creation of these stations is included in the current Federal Space Program until 2025.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

66 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Meckajiuhe 17 March 2020 09: 11 New
    • 8
    • 8
    0
    Everything, it's time to dump?)))
    1. ximkim 17 March 2020 09: 26 New
      • 6
      • 8
      -2
      No. Rather, flights of vehicles to the moon to launch something fly and create news ..
      1. kjhg 17 March 2020 09: 41 New
        • 29
        • 18
        +11
        Under the program of the lunar mission, Russia plans to send the Luna-2024 orbital station to the Moon in 26, and in 2025 the Luna-27 landing station.
        I bet with anyone and anything that these plans will fail, like all previous ones. The problem is not a lack of minds or even a lack of funds. The problem is in the existing system.
        1. ximkim 17 March 2020 10: 00 New
          • 3
          • 11
          -8
          Flying to the moon is a routine. Plus, what do these plans give that show samples?
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. Krasnoyarsk 17 March 2020 12: 14 New
              • 4
              • 3
              +1
              Quote: For example


              Any American will confirm this to you.
              Anglo-Saxons and their vassals know that RUSSIANs examined the moon.

              You're not right. For the whole world of the USSR this is - the Russians. But we know that the RUSSIANS are the citizens of Russia. And not only Russians live in Russia.
              Therefore, yes, it is RUSSIAN missiles, because they have a share of labor not only of Russian nationality. So it will be fair. And the Communists with EBN have nothing to do with it.
          2. orionvitt 17 March 2020 18: 03 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: ximkim
            Flying to the moon is a routine

            Since when? Some today, even before the ISS, cannot reach. And before, it’s like to the moon, they flew (?) As in a “weekend trip”. From their words of course. lol
            1. Shurik70 17 March 2020 21: 22 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              There, even Israeli students launched their device
              1. orionvitt 18 March 2020 00: 30 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                So the device was launched, or flew.? You already decide on the terminology. Here, some particularly advanced ones constantly insist that Musk, along with NASA, constantly fly somewhere, although the last manned flight, the Americans had on July 21, 2011.
                1. Shurik70 18 March 2020 12: 53 New
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  +1
                  Quote: orionvitt
                  So the device was launched, or flew.?

                  In the article, the conversation is not even about the lunar rover, but simply the “apparatus”. That is, the analogue of the Moon-9 from the 1966th year. A soft-landed descent vehicle filled with various equipment.
        2. loki565 17 March 2020 10: 03 New
          • 8
          • 18
          -10
          I bet with anyone and anything

          put a point ???)))
          1. Bacha 17 March 2020 10: 14 New
            • 7
            • 6
            +1
            And you yours for flying?
            1. loki565 17 March 2020 10: 19 New
              • 15
              • 15
              0
              And you yours for flying?

              Yes, I don’t scratch my tongue left and right))) And all-crawlers will whine even if they fly, sit down and successfully complete the mission. Check for future comments, it will be like: it would be better if they gave this money to pregnant pensioners)))
              1. orionvitt 17 March 2020 18: 04 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                Quote: loki565
                Check for future comments

                Do you write from Lviv?
                1. Motorist 17 March 2020 23: 38 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Probably, it meant "check" - check, not wait.
                  1. orionvitt 18 March 2020 00: 21 New
                    • 1
                    • 0
                    +1
                    Quote: Motorist
                    Probably meant "check"

                    In any case, there are no such words in the Russian language. And then they swear that the native Muscovites are in the fifth generation. laughing
          2. kjhg 17 March 2020 10: 21 New
            • 11
            • 6
            +5
            Quote: loki565
            I bet with anyone and anything

            put a point ???)))

            Omitted ... argue about this?belay
            Dear, I’ll say in your language so that it comes to you. I have such zapadlo even in the same room to be. Well, and your place you already know where - near couples .. shi. Even from reading your question it feels as if I’ve stepped on the bow. Ugh!
            1. loki565 17 March 2020 10: 27 New
              • 9
              • 16
              -7
              So it’s you who grind with your tongue you don’t understand what))) Ok, will you set up an apartment? Miles of dollars you put ???))) it turns out just a couch empty
              1. Cruel beaver 17 March 2020 10: 36 New
                • 10
                • 4
                +6
                What is this bunch of LGBT people? Or nothing to talk about? Do not disgrace or go to gay sites !!!!
            2. loki565 17 March 2020 11: 44 New
              • 3
              • 7
              -4
              Omitted ... argue about this? Belay
              Dear, I’ll say in your language so that it comes to you. I have such zapadlo even in the same room to be. Well, and your place you already know where - near couples .. shi. Even from reading your question it feels as if I’ve stepped on the bow. Ugh!
              Well sho you dear so got nervous, already rewrite the comments twice, a sore subject ??? you are not in sports and everything will be the norm))) Here, take an example from the Israelis, they jumped moon-hop and everyone is happy. Crashed - also good, touched on the future, experience and so on.
        3. dirk182 17 March 2020 10: 52 New
          • 3
          • 4
          -1
          also reset to zero?)
  2. bukhach 17 March 2020 09: 13 New
    • 3
    • 5
    -2
    God forbid, otherwise the "cosmos" are continuous disappointments.
    1. Cowbra 17 March 2020 09: 18 New
      • 20
      • 14
      +6
      Well, how can I say ... Here, our next backup glonass was launched today ... It was at the Mask the day before yesterday that Spice-He again didn’t fly anywhere - it only had Starships flying - in pieces and not high, two had already flown ... 20 meters so laughing Almost to the moon, yes ... Soon it will fly to Mars
      1. Greenwood 17 March 2020 09: 23 New
        • 11
        • 12
        -1
        Are you hinting that Mask is failing?
        1. Cowbra 17 March 2020 09: 30 New
          • 15
          • 16
          -1
          How nothing? Fools nae ... Turning into your sect - it even turns out ... And from the rest - you don’t see a nifig ...
          1. donavi49 17 March 2020 09: 41 New
            • 17
            • 14
            +3
            Only Musk has already flown 4 times. All of Russia 3. Current account USA / Russia 7-3.

            b / ear booster that goes on a flight record, the computer detected a deviation in the operation of one engine and stopped the ignition. On the contrary, the accident protection system worked by 5 points.

            Fly tomorrow. If the weather doesn’t hurt.
            1. Cowbra 17 March 2020 09: 59 New
              • 9
              • 15
              -6
              There is such a thing. The mask is funded by NASA. NASA needs to account for where the money went. Because LOBBY pushes the Mask up. And flights, simply objectively, the US will now have all kinds of more, because as more money.
              But this does not negate the fact that the Mask does not go out of engineering nichrome. Those 4 flew - how much loading? 2,5 tons. Falcon-9 was opened at 22. By the way, this one, which did not fly, should display exactly 22 — there the orbit is low. What kind of download? Again somewhere near.
              The conclusion is simple - either lies with cargo capacity, or flies empty, i.e. nobody’s useless garbage was designed - for it is unprofitable to fly from 10% of the load.
              Nichrome again failed. And the lobby ... This is the USA, they have three unarmed Zyama floating at a cost of 21 lard ... So cut on a masked guan - seeds
              1. donavi49 17 March 2020 10: 19 New
                • 11
                • 9
                +2
                I realized I will not waste time on the reverse sectarian wink .

                It is so funded by NASA that Boeing was canceled a bunch of tests to catch up. Jim was ready to sign a manned flight, despite the failure of the lead. However, then, it suddenly became clear that due to other program errors, if the astronauts were in the capsule, they would probably die. Well, they have already been imposed on them an independent audit of the software from the committee. As a result, Jim had to blush, whiten, mumble and dodge for Boeing.
              2. Svetlana 17 March 2020 21: 42 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                Quote: Cowbra
                What kind of download?

                Musk smokes on the sidelines. Russian Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin instructed Deputy Prime Minister Yuri Borisov to develop and approve a roadmap for the development of the space industry in Russia within three months. According to RIA Novosti, it will include the creation of new satellite orbital constellations and the development of promising launch vehicles.
                To implement the project, in addition to Roscosmos, which is entrusted with drawing up the program, the Ministry of Industry and Trade, the Ministry of Communications, the Ministry of Economic Development and the Ministry of Education and Science, as well as the state corporations Gazprom and Rosatom will be involved. The main goal is the sharp development of Russian space technology and technology until 2024. An important role is played by the problem of the negative effects of prolonged exposure to zero gravity on the human body. The solution to this problem can be the creation of a promising manned spacecraft (PKA) "TOP", which is a freely rotating torus with a diameter of several tens of meters. It is now being developed at the Moscow Aviation Institute.
                The toroidal cryogenic tank scramjet is welded from 36 identical sections. Each section, together with a solenoid fixed inside the HTSC section, is manufactured at the factory. Dimensions of sections: width 3,14m; length 4,00 m, height 4.00 m allow transporting them to the cosmodrome (along the tundra, by rail where the courier Vorkuta-Leningrad rushes)
                Before starting, helium gas is inflated with gaseous helium over the free surfaces of liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen in a toroidal cryogenic tank and each and 36 pieces of HTSC solenoids are fed with an electric current of 3 MegaAmper. As a result, the toroidal cryogenic tank becomes stiff, like an inflated car tire. Rigidity is necessary for a toroidal tank to prevent destruction under the action of dynamic loads during launch from the cosmodrome and during entry into dense atmospheric layers on the descent from orbit.

                A toroidal spaceship can be used to deliver “payload” weighing 100 tons to a lunar orbit. (for organizing a noble bowling alley in geostationary orbit)
                A toroidal spaceship with a magnetic nozzle will not fall sideways when landing on released shock absorbing landing feet, due to the low center of gravity of the scramjet toroidal tank with a large diameter of 36 m and a small diameter of 4 m.
                A spaceship with a toroidal hypersonic ramjet engine and a magnetic nozzle will increase the payload mass, since it almost does not carry oxygen to burn fuel (liquid hydrogen), but takes it from the atmosphere.
                Technical characteristics of a reusable ring rocket:
              3. Evgeny Goncharov (smoogg) 18 March 2020 02: 41 New
                • 0
                • 2
                -2
                > Mask - funded by NASA
                You are a dumb balabol.

                > Because LOBBY pushes the Mask up
                You are a dumb balabol.

                > Those that 4 flew - how much loading? 2,5 tons
                If not a dumb balabol - tell us how many times during your entire career Proton-M brought more than 20 tons to the IEO.
            2. loki565 17 March 2020 10: 32 New
              • 8
              • 4
              +4
              on the contrary, the accident protection system worked by 5 points.

              It is difficult to say that it worked by 5 points, the timer reached the end, even an oxidizer was released, an explosion could well have occurred.
              1. donavi49 17 March 2020 11: 08 New
                • 7
                • 7
                0
                Well, so the computer cannot look to the future yet. As soon as the parameters went beyond the tolerance, they put out. It can be seen, until the ignition started, the engine issued normal data.

                Fail would be if she broke away and only then began somersaults. So everything is fine. Rocket and cargo saved. Rescheduling is minimal.
                1. loki565 17 March 2020 11: 55 New
                  • 5
                  • 4
                  +1
                  Well, so the computer still can not look to the future.
                  it’s strange how, then, the start is canceled in 10 minutes, in a minute, in a few seconds? then the system detects a breakdown before starting.
                  Fail would be if she broke away and only then began somersaults. So everything is fine. Rocket and cargo saved. Minor rescheduling
                  .
                  I agree, but not 100%. If the timer had stopped before starting and the oxidizer was not emitted, then yes, the system worked by 5 points. And here the oxidizing agent is oxygen, any spark, static discharge, and there would be a large BAH
            3. orionvitt 17 March 2020 18: 08 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Quote: donavi49
              Only Musk has already flown 4 times

              Tricky question. Where did it fly? I started something, it was, but to fly, no one has flown anywhere.
    2. Insurgent 17 March 2020 09: 19 New
      • 12
      • 11
      +1
      Quote: Buhach
      God forbid, otherwise the "cosmos" are continuous disappointments.


      The Russian lunar program will resume in 2021, when the first spacecraft will be launched on a satellite of the earth after a 45-year hiatus.


      “A 45-year break”, the article outlines the time lag of Russia, as a space power, lagging behind the level of such in the USSR ...
      1. slipped 17 March 2020 12: 33 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Quote: Insurgent
        “A 45-year break”, the article outlines the time lag of Russia, as a space power, lagging behind the level of such in the USSR ...


        What a stupid thing. The USSR didn’t have such a thing at all:



        Map of the southern polar region of the Moon according to the LEND instrument from 2009 to 2018. The color shows variations in the mass fraction of water (WEH), which corresponds to the observed amount of hydrogen in the soil (c) Department of Nuclear Planetology, IKI RAS
  3. Fedorov 17 March 2020 09: 15 New
    • 4
    • 2
    +2
    Plans are normal and correct. Or maybe they’ll decide to drill a well? km for 10, suddenly they will find. hi A crazy idea, of course, but plans and ideas can be built.
  4. georggy 17 March 2020 09: 23 New
    • 4
    • 6
    -2
    In "Energy" note that for the flights of the "Eagle" to the moon, in addition to rockets of the Angara family, it is planned to use the developed superheavy carrier Yenisei.

    Energia has been working on the Federation for more than 10 years. The ship was planned to be created in two versions - for flights to low Earth orbit and to the moon. Subsequently, it was decided to continue to use the Soyuz family ships for the first case, and to create the Eagle exclusively for flights to the Earth’s satellite. This ship has never flown.

    Unlike Russia, the United States currently has three high-readiness reusable manned spacecraft. The Lockheed Martin Orion aircraft, designed for lunar-Martian missions, made its first flight into space in December 2014, in 2021 it will carry out a second flight, during which it is planned to fly around the moon. The SpaceX Crew Dragon spaceship made its first flight (in unmanned mode) to the ISS in March 2019. In December, the Boeing Starliner will fly to the station (in unmanned mode).
    1. slipped 17 March 2020 12: 00 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: george
      Energia has been working on the Federation for more than 10 years.


      1.6 Timing for the implementation of the MF OCD

      1.7 Beginning -10.2016.

      1.8 Ending - 11.2025.
  5. donavi49 17 March 2020 09: 37 New
    • 8
    • 6
    +2
    I wonder how many total scientific equipment will fly there? The last time they squeezed in 18kg.

    Well, in fact, this unfinished building has the main goal, to show we are back on the moon. The science program is small. Equipment is scarce. Yes, they did not sit on the South Pole and this is interesting. But really there is nothing special to do research.
    1. loki565 17 March 2020 10: 09 New
      • 3
      • 1
      +2
      You straight
      moon hopper
      described)))
      1. donavi49 17 March 2020 10: 23 New
        • 5
        • 2
        +3
        Moon Jumping is a private mission. Which initially was generally done under Google Prize. Where you just had to land.

        Immediately the mission of the national agency, which was done for almost 10 years.
        1. loki565 17 March 2020 10: 34 New
          • 2
          • 1
          +1
          Rather, it was frozen for so many years due to lack of funding, so to speak, followed in the footsteps of Phobos-Grunt
          1. Mordvin 3 17 March 2020 10: 41 New
            • 2
            • 3
            -1
            Quote: loki565
            Rather, it was frozen for so many years due to lack of funding,

            Was there little funding over the last 15 years of work on Moon 25? It was planned to be launched 6 years ago.
    2. slipped 17 March 2020 12: 45 New
      • 1
      • 2
      -1
      Quote: donavi49
      But really there is nothing special to do research.


      Cool. laughing Do not worry, the number of devices on the device is enough to carry out its entire scientific program. For example, it has an active neutron and gamma ray detector ADRON:



      The device is designed to study the elemental composition of the lunar surface at the spacecraft landing site using methods of active neutron and gamma spectroscopy.

      Through the use of this equipment, data will be obtained on the composition of the material on the surface of the moon at a depth of 1 meter directly at the point of location of the stationary device. These data will be used to determine the origin of the lunar surface, to compare the composition of samples of lunar matter delivered to Earth with an average composition of matter at a depth of up to 1 meter, and also for exploration of minerals that are potentially suitable for the exploration of lunar resources.
  6. Chaldon48 17 March 2020 09: 37 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    At the same time, we find out whether Antarctica is on the Moon or not.
  7. rocket757 17 March 2020 09: 38 New
    • 2
    • 7
    -5
    The RAS announced the launch date of the first Russian spacecraft to the moon


    if the RAS is connected to the process ... of boltology about astronautics, I want to ask a question, is everything all right in that RAS ???
  8. arhitroll 17 March 2020 09: 39 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    The telescope must be put there, it will be useful ...
    1. lis-ik 17 March 2020 09: 56 New
      • 3
      • 6
      -3
      Quote: arhitroll
      The telescope must be put there, it will be useful ...

      No, it's better the State Duma building.
  9. knn54 17 March 2020 09: 41 New
    • 1
    • 4
    -3
    The BASIC problem is in the control system. The old one was practically on transistors. There were a couple of upgraded devices on the IC.
    It is also worth noting that in the USSR there were no microprocessors approved for use in the military and space industries.
    Now, yes, under the conditions of sanctions, we have to start with "0". Moreover, if the "ideology" is subject to revision.
    1. Genry 17 March 2020 14: 45 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: knn54
      It is also worth noting that in the USSR there were no microprocessors approved for use in the military and space industries.

      Have you heard about microchips with rhombuses? So you're talking about nothing ....
    2. Servisinzhener 18 March 2020 10: 06 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      What is this?

  10. Alex 2020 17 March 2020 10: 05 New
    • 5
    • 4
    +1
    ... It is a pity only - to live in this wonderful time
    I don’t have to - neither to me, nor to you ...
  11. Million 17 March 2020 10: 25 New
    • 5
    • 7
    -2
    Most likely it will not fly. And they don’t need to, the main thing is to master the money ..
  12. Mr. X 17 March 2020 11: 08 New
    • 0
    • 7
    -7
    We will see. The government has changed. Maybe we’ll fly.
  13. syndicalist 17 March 2020 11: 19 New
    • 3
    • 5
    -2
    All news in this topic starts the same way: "They are going to start," "It is planned to begin designing." And so for about 20 years.
  14. ximkim 17 March 2020 11: 43 New
    • 1
    • 5
    -4
    Quote: For example
    the first Russian spacecraft to the moon

    Here is the EBN and its comrades-in-arms, the communists, who invented the shnyaga with their “Russians” ...

    Russian rockets flew to the moon.
    Russian vehicles were the first on the moon.
    The Russian lunar rover was the first to explore the moon.
    The Russians were the first to bring soil from the moon.

    Any American will confirm this to you.
    Anglo-Saxons and their vassals know that the Russians sawed the moon.

    But the Communists furiously say that the first Russian missiles will fly to the moon.
    "Russians", "Soviet people" - no matter how rattles communists will come up with, their comrades-in-arms for the Russian man and the Russian state.
    Communists russophobes worse than tribalt and dill.

    What do flights and launches of vehicles on the moon give?
    1. Genry 17 March 2020 14: 58 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Quote: ximkim
      What do flights and launches of vehicles on the moon give?

      The main interest is that presumably the moon is a huge artifact (artificial object). His research can greatly advance science and technology.

      And there is Helium-3 on it ....
    2. orionvitt 17 March 2020 18: 16 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: ximkim
      What do flights and launches of vehicles on the moon give?

      And what did the launch of the first satellite and the flight of Gagarin give? And also all subsequent ones.
  15. Romanenko 17 March 2020 13: 55 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    What, you can bet how much and how many times her (date) is shifted to the right?
    1. orionvitt 17 March 2020 18: 18 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Everything is done slowly and costs more. (Murphy's Law). However, judging by the statements of some, especially gifted, both in politics and in space technology, it’s easier to do nothing at all.
  16. pexotinec 17 March 2020 17: 40 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    I would not make such statements in advance, so that later I would not sniff and postpone the deadlines. It always happens with our managers.