US does not believe in a real ceasefire in Idlib

56
US does not believe in a real ceasefire in Idlib

The United States does not believe in the ability of the Syrian government army with the help of Russia to free the Syrian province of Idlib from terrorists, and also to ensure a genuine ceasefire there. A statement was made by US Special Representative for Syria James Jeffrey.

According to Jeffrey, there will be no real ceasefire, since Russia, in violation of the agreements, will use the pretext of the fight against terrorists and violate this regime.



The Turks are now saying - and we support them 100% that there can no longer be such truces. They must be real, they must be solid, they must be a line on the earth that no one crosses. We support it

- said the American diplomat.

Another reason that the Syrian army will not be able to win, Jeffrey called is that "the Turks will not be able to retreat," because this will lead to new millions of refugees in their territory.

The US Special Representative for Syria confirmed that Washington is considering various options for assisting Turkey, but so far no decision has been made.

At the same time, Jeffrey accused Russia of unwillingness to resolve the situation in Idlib by political methods and proposed to increase pressure on Moscow and Tehran in order to force Russia and Iran to compromise on Syria.
56 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    6 March 2020 09: 23
    Oh. but who cares what you think there ?! What amuses -Russian break.
    1. +14
      6 March 2020 09: 31
      By this they simply say that they will not let the truce come to pass and will support the terrorists in the future. The typical American way of saying first is that we think Assad might use chemical. weapons and a few days later they themselves arrange a provocation through their jackals "white helmets" and shout, we told you. And the general chorus of condemnation begins. Everyone knows everything and everyone pretends to believe and this will continue until they get it in the teeth.
      1. +2
        6 March 2020 11: 34
        "Baba Yaga is against".
        1. +3
          6 March 2020 12: 28
          Morons ....
          The Dutch here wanted a no-fly zone in Idlib.
          Who is interested in the opinion of Holland?
          The Yankees have already been hinted that they are on the line, so they worry about the Turks. bully
          1. +1
            6 March 2020 13: 29
            Well, the Yankees do not believe in a ceasefire ... So what?
            I, too, do not believe that they "out of altruism" control oil production in Iraq and Syria.
          2. 0
            6 March 2020 23: 31
            Quote: Alex777
            The Dutch here wanted a no-fly zone in Idlib.

            Let the candidate be declared for ensuring a no-fly zone - Ukraine! They do not care whom and when to shoot down!
    2. +7
      6 March 2020 10: 16
      You just need to correctly read: "The USA DOES NOT WANT a ceasefire," and will do its best to escalate.
  2. +5
    6 March 2020 09: 24
    "The United States does not believe in a real ceasefire in Idlib," if there were only Syrians, Russians, Turks and terrorists in that area, so there the Americans fumble in the open, naturally there will be no ceasefire, they will contribute to this. According to the press, the lull lasted 18 minutes.
    1. -1
      6 March 2020 09: 53
      What are we? recourse Will we answer this special representative? !! angry At least verbally? !! stop
  3. +7
    6 March 2020 09: 26
    The US does not believe in a real ceasefire in Idlib.

    And I do not believe it, while the United States will run with a gas canister in BV.
  4. +5
    6 March 2020 09: 26
    Epic nonsense.
    However, it has become a tradition of US officials.
    1. +2
      6 March 2020 12: 41
      Quote: Livonetc
      Epic nonsense.
      However, it has become a tradition of US officials.

      And what is the nonsense? Do you believe the fighting will end? I do not believe in this, because it will actually mean the annexation of Idlib by Turkey, which neither Russia nor Syria can allow. On the other hand, do you think the Idlib gangs will lay down their arms and go cultivate the land? No, of course, they will not stop fighting. So, they need to either be destroyed or forced out to Turkey. Therefore, after a short respite, the war will continue.
  5. +3
    6 March 2020 09: 26
    To be honest, I also do not believe in a ceasefire in this long-suffering province!
    1. +2
      6 March 2020 09: 50
      Quote: Leader of the Redskins
      To be honest, I also do not believe in a ceasefire in this long-suffering province!

      So no side of the conflict is interested in this. Each seeks its own benefit in continuing it, but each in its own way and with its own ending.
    2. 0
      6 March 2020 11: 48
      yes, but the intensity has clearly decreased, the conflict has moved to another phase. low intensity fighting.
  6. +3
    6 March 2020 09: 26
    If the states do not believe, then it is immediately clear that there will be no ceasefire. Oh, they will try ....
    1. +2
      6 March 2020 09: 49
      While at least one terrorist or foreign occupier in the land of Syria - there will be no peace stopudovo ..
  7. +18
    6 March 2020 09: 27
    And I, as the self-appointed special representative of myself in the United States, declare: the so-called US authorities are not legitimate, due to the opacity and undemocratic nature of their elections. Therefore, I believe that the US government should be disbanded, withdrawn into the courtyard and executed in full force.
    1. +3
      6 March 2020 09: 50
      Quote: Yrec
      And I, as the self-appointed special representative of myself in the USA

      Well done! good
      And I, an honored participant of Sunday subbotniks, as a voice of the people - I support!
    2. 0
      6 March 2020 09: 52
      Quote: Yrec
      Therefore, I believe that the US government should be disbanded, withdrawn into the courtyard and executed in full force.

      If he accidentally hooks someone from Congress or the Senate, then he will do the same.
    3. +1
      6 March 2020 10: 01
      Why disband? On the contrary, form into columns in two, output in the field. Shoot from the ZU-23 from a distance of 50m. Running is allowed, but in circles.
  8. +1
    6 March 2020 09: 28
    At the same time, Jeffrey accused Russia of unwillingness to resolve the situation in Idlib by political methods

    Donnie can tell him what happens after a "good conversation" in Afghanistan, somehow right after the conversation they switched to a fight ... request
  9. +2
    6 March 2020 09: 30
    Quote: "The US does not believe in a real ceasefire in Idlib."
    Yes, simply because it does not fit into their plans to "pacify" the region.
  10. +3
    6 March 2020 09: 31
    The Turks are now saying - and we support them 100% that there can no longer be such truces. They must be real, they must be solid, they must be a line on the earth that no one crosses. We support it
    Well, that's the whole story. "We support them", support the war, but do not support the fight against ISIS terrorists and various evil spirits. You Turks seize the territory of an independent state, and we support you. And the Turks will continue the war with such support. As always, the states rake in the heat with the wrong hands. All this the world took place from 1938 to 1945.
  11. +1
    6 March 2020 09: 32
    Here you read the article and wonder
    [/ quote] The United States does not believe in the ability of the Syrian government army with the help of Russia to free the Syrian province of Idlib from terrorists, and also to ensure a genuine ceasefire there. A statement was made by US Special Representative for Syria James Jeffrey.


    Here is the logic

    According to Jeffrey, there will be no real ceasefire, since Russia, in violation of the agreements, will use the pretext of the fight against terrorists and violate this regime [quote]


    And then, as always .. go away, stop,
  12. +3
    6 March 2020 09: 33
    Jeffrey accused Russia of unwillingness to resolve the situation in Idlib by political methods and proposed to increase pressure on Moscow
    The reaction of the United States could not even be doubted. It is stereotyped, and therefore expectedly predictable.
  13. 0
    6 March 2020 09: 45
    The United States does not believe in the ability of the Syrian government army with the help of Russia to free the Syrian province of Idlib from terrorists

    Yes? And judging by the way the Sultan began to fuss, he believes. He knows better near, probably.
  14. +3
    6 March 2020 09: 46
    Mattresses are not hiding worrying about the fate of the terrorists in Idlib, they say Russia can continue to fight with them, but at the same time they use the same terrorists as an excuse for their presence on the fields of the Syrian oil industry, they say we would have left, but we need oil from the terrorists to guard. Everything as always - stupid double American standards.
  15. +2
    6 March 2020 09: 46
    Nothing new "Katz offers to stay".
  16. 0
    6 March 2020 09: 48
    They are FEEDING from this! how can they say otherwise ... Then they will be reduced as unnecessary!
  17. 0
    6 March 2020 09: 54
    There is an old, but absolutely accurate folk proverb, relevant to this case:
    If the mother-in-law is a woman with reduced social responsibility, then she does not believe in a daughter-in-law.
  18. 0
    6 March 2020 09: 58
    This is the main thing to pit countries. Cannibals.
  19. 0
    6 March 2020 10: 02
    Naturally, the agreement in advance contains demands that were obviously impossible for the militants, just as their previous Sochi agreement contained, the Sochi one ended up occupying half of the Idlib zone and destroying a large part of the stubborn fighters, whom the Turks had fought on Assad, and real non-compliance with the ceasefire will lead to complete elimination of terrorists.
  20. +1
    6 March 2020 10: 05
    Here you go, everything is upside down! I also don’t believe that the fire will be stopped. The bandits and their Turkish well-wishers will spoil unambiguously. Well, in the face they will receive regularly.
  21. 0
    6 March 2020 10: 16
    The Turks are now saying - and we support them 100% that there can no longer be such truces. They must be real, they must be solid, they must be a line on the earth
    And on whose "land"? did not explain merikatosina? angry
  22. +3
    6 March 2020 10: 18
    It means that it is necessary to bring in ammunition, repair kits, prepare defensive positions and, of course, echelon air defense. So that as soon as the "Russians violate" there was something to justify such expectations of the Americans. Well, so that it’s not enough to anyone, and those who want to fight for American money in the world have greatly diminished.
  23. +2
    6 March 2020 10: 35
    US does not believe in a real ceasefire in Idlib

    Most of the bearded are lured to the United States, what kind of truce can we talk about, provocations will begin with the riflemen and PRURAMI, the Syrians will answer and then the cry The Syrians have violated the "truce" from lovers of democracy.
  24. 0
    6 March 2020 10: 36
    The states deliberately drive in advance to the entire world community the idea that Syria and Russia will be to blame for the next shelling. In reality, the aggravation of the situation is beneficial to America, the Turks and their terrorists. I suppose that the terrorists with whom there was no agreement on a ceasefire will start shelling first.
  25. +1
    6 March 2020 10: 52
    Everything is mirrored, everything returns, we and not only do not believe the stripes from the definition of ALL!
    1. +1
      6 March 2020 11: 34
      Well, let them not believe, very few people believe them. They believe in white helmets, for example. And we did not believe that the states were leaving Syria .....
  26. 0
    6 March 2020 11: 48
    From the beginning it is necessary to ask this citizen from where these same terrorists appeared and thanks to whom? And already for those who really fight with them and who consider themselves exceptional.
  27. -4
    6 March 2020 12: 00
    Erdogan got his way. Turkish troops do not leave Syria, Assad's offensive is foiled. I think this is the main result of yesterday’s talks.
  28. +1
    6 March 2020 12: 04
    Americans have just begun to test their air racket air, and here such a bummer-truce.
    Especially after the idlib and the Turks, the turn to exit the eastern part of Syria and the Americans. So they rage
    1. -3
      6 March 2020 12: 11
      Turks just do not go anywhere. And yesterday, Erdogan clearly said everything at a press conference.
  29. 0
    6 March 2020 12: 35
    White Helmets are already rehearsing US prepared scripts, like Russia and Syria, violating the ceasefire ... are waiting ...
  30. ANB
    +1
    6 March 2020 12: 49
    . they must be a line on earth that no one crosses. We support it

    So this line is. The border of Turkey and Syria. Where is the support from the US?
  31. +2
    6 March 2020 12: 53
    The Special Representative simply once again repeated his favorite US mantras: 1. Russia is to blame for everything. Always and in everything. 2. The Turks need to fight with Russia. Why? Yes, just like that, just because the US wants it.
    The USA has lost the previous round, they are preparing for a new round.
  32. ANB
    +1
    6 March 2020 12: 55
    Quote: ertu
    Erdogan got his way. Turkish troops do not leave Syria, Assad's offensive is foiled. I think this is the main result of yesterday’s talks.

    What did he achieve there?
    I wanted our Syria to leave, give him the opportunity to gouge the SAA and take back the whole Idlib. Or maybe go further.
    But in fact, he secured everything that was squeezed from the barmalei and handed over another road.
    And, yes, I also received apologies and condolences for the dead Turks.
    To free all Idlib from Syria, we still wouldn’t have enough strength, even with our help. Yes, and where to put the family of barmaley? They cannot be killed, but nowhere to evict.
    1. -5
      6 March 2020 13: 05
      I got it. 70-80 percent. You just have to be able to face the truth. And the last word was left to him. At the press conference, he again laid all the blame on Assad. And warned for the future.
  33. ANB
    0
    6 March 2020 12: 58
    Quote: ertu
    Turks just do not go anywhere. And yesterday, Erdogan clearly said everything at a press conference.

    Yes, let them stick around. They were launched as a scarecrow for the Kurds. And after all, the effect is obtained.
    1. -3
      6 March 2020 13: 08
      As a scarecrow for the Turks, they are in other areas. In Afrin, for example. And no one started them here. And he did not ask anyone for permission. Yes, there was a compromise yesterday. But a little more beneficial for the Turks.
      1. ANB
        0
        6 March 2020 13: 13
        https://topwar.ru/168705-putin-jerdogan-kto-komu-slil.html

        Here in the next article everything is beautifully chewed. I won’t write so much on the phone. But I agree with every word.
  34. 0
    6 March 2020 13: 08
    Striped as always lie, just barmaley need to be smeared with a thin layer on the ground and local residents will not have to run somewhere, and striped and turks go to hell to go home.
  35. -1
    6 March 2020 14: 07
    The USA is not a world gendarme, but a world watcher. According to the Russian one who is in charge of creating a criminal community, should be in prison. The criminal community is NATO. Plus terrorism financing! Yes, even selling weapons to terrorists. You can file a lawsuit with a world tribunal for oppressing the country's indigenous population. And what is the sponsorship of Hitler’s fascist regime?
  36. 0
    6 March 2020 15: 05
    And what do we smoke in America?
  37. 0
    8 March 2020 09: 02
    then there are already plans to violate the ceasefire and the perpetrators have already been appointed