Lost Turkish tank M60TM with protection of Ukrainian origin


In the Internet space attracted the attention of users recently taken photograph, which depicts one of the main representatives of the tank fleet of the Turkish armed forces. The equipment destroyed as a result of the air raid was equipped with protection of Ukrainian origin.


During an aerial attack, the Sabra M60TM, adopted by the Turkish army, was shot down. Various modifications of the Sabra appeared as a result of the refinement of the American main tank M60, which was ordered by Ankara from the Israeli military-industrial complex.

Lost Turkish tank M60TM with protection of Ukrainian origin


Destroyed vehicle is equipped with AKKOR Pulat active protection system. This KAZ was created on the basis of Zaslon-L, developed in Ukraine as part of the modernization of the Soviet Zaslon product. In the photographs, you can see the radar unit, which is installed under the protective munition. Elements of the complex are on the fenders of the tank.

At the same time, tanks with clearly outdated “Contact-1” dynamic protection belonging to the first generation of complexes continue to operate in Russia. So, the Zvezda TV channel published footage of Russian T-72AV maneuvers serving in Tajikistan at the 201st military base. On them, the placement of the Contact-1 DZ is noticeable.

Photos used:
https://vk.com/armies_of_the_world
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

71 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Same lech 3 March 2020 02: 29 New
    • 32
    • 2
    +30
    Where, when, how, by whom and under what circumstances was this tank hit?
    And why is it knocked out? ... so it can be returned to service after repair ... the information in the article is complete jelly.
    1. Zoldat_A 3 March 2020 02: 39 New
      • 16
      • 2
      +14
      Quote: The same Lech
      Where, when, how, by whom and under what circumstances was this tank hit?

      And why are there some rags scattered on the armor - like in a reserved seat car after a drunken shift worker ....
      And who is there on the left - like someone’s hand?
      1. Same lech 3 March 2020 02: 46 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        And who is there on the left - like someone’s hand?

        Yes, it’s a rag ... it looks like a hand ... and you don’t see serious defeats on the tank ... the photo is not known where it was taken from. what
        1. Stalllker 3 March 2020 05: 29 New
          • 3
          • 1
          +2
          The crew thumped, not a single day. To the campaign. It looks like a hut after drinking
      2. carstorm 11 3 March 2020 03: 21 New
        • 4
        • 2
        +2
        tried to extinguish with everything that came to hand. Take a closer look, they also tried to fill up the ground with that, in principle, stupidity-bk will beat everyone apart.
        1. bessmertniy 3 March 2020 03: 51 New
          • 10
          • 1
          +9
          In general, perhaps, the tank and, probably, the crew were lucky. Of course, they are out of order, but they can return. I would like the Turkish tanks to burn better somehow or something ... repeat
        2. Zoldat_A 3 March 2020 04: 00 New
          • 5
          • 3
          +2
          Quote: carstorm 11
          tried to extinguish with everything that came to hand. Take a closer look, they also tried to fill up the ground with that, in principle, stupidity-bk will beat everyone apart.

          Why did I remember about drunken shift workers and a reserved seat car.

          About 20 years ago, he was traveling from Western Siberia, from relatives, home. In the reserved seat half of the car were shift workers returning from the "north" to the "mainland". Until two o'clock in the morning they thumped, at half-past four one of them had a mattress lit up - a smoking bastard, on the top shelf, and fell asleep. They dragged the poor fellow from the top shelf to the floor with a steaming mattress and for 30 minutes 10 drunken shift workers ran around the carriage to the toilet with glasses - they poured water on both of them. The picture was then about the same ... laughing

          Where did the rags come from in the tank? Some kind of rug ... I’m not a tanker at all, therefore I don’t know. Maybe these rags are regular property? laughing
          1. Stalllker 3 March 2020 05: 31 New
            • 17
            • 0
            +17
            As if the drunken NOT shift workers behave differently?))))) I have been working as a pig for 10 years, being a pig, it depends on the person himself, and not on where he works))
            1. Rostovchanin 3 March 2020 05: 45 New
              • 14
              • 1
              +13
              Who did not work on duty has a preconceived notion of the work and lifestyle of our brother. In their opinion, the image of a “real” person is office plankton.
              1. Zoldat_A 3 March 2020 08: 59 New
                • 3
                • 1
                +2
                Quote: Stalllker
                As if the drunken NOT shift workers behave differently?)))))

                Quote: Rostovchanin
                Who did not work on duty has a preconceived notion of the work and lifestyle of our brother.

                Yes, I myself am one of those ... laughing Therefore, no bias towards shift workers.
                Itself is not a year or two across Russia on business trips by an installer of metal structures.

                And yes. The main thing is not that a shift worker, but that they drink like the last time. We also had one such one - five hours on a shift bus and I don’t remember that he got out of the bus at least once on the day of arrival and on the day of departure on his feet. I respect cognac too - but not to the same extent ...
                1. Narak-zempo 3 March 2020 09: 50 New
                  • 2
                  • 1
                  +1
                  Quote: Zoldat_A
                  The main thing is not that the shift worker, but that they drink like the last time

                  Well, this is the case. And suddenly, really - the last. Who exactly can know this? Especially if the booze is of unknown origin. How many people were poisoned by singed vodka and industrial alcohol. And you can’t drink, because then, in general, longing.
                2. Stalllker 3 March 2020 12: 03 New
                  • 2
                  • 0
                  +2
                  Itself wrote "you had ONE such" !!!
              2. Essex62 4 March 2020 14: 35 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                Here it is, yes, the color of the nation of sedatives to holes and smoke breaks every 10 minutes. Workers plow. Plankton sways behind the glass.
            2. Piramidon 3 March 2020 10: 28 New
              • 3
              • 1
              +2
              Quote: Stalllker
              Some rug

              Staffing They perform prayers on rugs.
              1. Zoldat_A 3 March 2020 16: 27 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                Quote: Piramidon
                Quote: Stalllker
                Some rug

                Staffing They perform prayers on rugs.

                No, well, it's in the tank, of course, the main thing ... laughing
          2. unhappy 3 March 2020 07: 39 New
            • 4
            • 0
            +4
            [quoteWhere are so many rags in the tank? Some kind of rug ... I’m not a tanker at all, therefore I don’t know. Maybe these rags are regular property? laughing] [/ quote]
            I myself am surprised that the armored vehicles are moving loaded with trunks, suitcases, blankets and other junk, Porcupine.
            1. Zoldat_A 3 March 2020 09: 01 New
              • 3
              • 0
              +3
              Quote: unhappy
              I myself am surprised that the armored vehicles are moving loaded with trunks, suitcases, blankets and other junk, Wildness.

              Wives with five children are not enough ... But cho - some kind of trailer for the tank would have been knocked down .... From the kitchen ...
            2. Starover_Z 3 March 2020 10: 26 New
              • 1
              • 1
              0
              Quote: unhappy
              Quote: Zoldat_A
              Where did the rags come from in the tank? Some kind of rug ... I’m not a tanker at all, therefore I don’t know. Maybe these rags are regular property?

              I myself am surprised that the armored vehicles are moving loaded with trunks, suitcases, blankets and other junk, Porcupine.

              Or maybe the shuttles asked them to bring, "- well, at least to the border, pliz!" ?
            3. voyaka uh 3 March 2020 11: 31 New
              • 3
              • 4
              -1
              There are no rags inside the tank.
              And outside, sleeping bags and personal belongings of tankers are transported in a crazy basket.
              This basket was made specifically so as not to drag extra objects inside.
              1. Piramidon 3 March 2020 18: 15 New
                • 2
                • 0
                +2
                Quote: voyaka uh
                This basket was made specifically so as not to drag extra objects inside.

                Alex, thanks for the educational program. hi And then, in my tank illiteracy, I always believed that this was an anti-cumulative defense. And it in cho! The trunk, however?
                1. voyaka uh 3 March 2020 18: 39 New
                  • 3
                  • 4
                  -1
                  That's right. The trunk.
                  On the excellent English tanks Centurion, popular once in Israel, similar boxes for things of tankers and all kinds of tools and adaptations that are harmful to carry inside the tank were both behind and on the sides of the tower. When hit, they shattered, of course. Unaesthetically ...
                  But these are costs.
                  1. Essex62 4 March 2020 14: 42 New
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    0
                    Noble tank, beautiful precisely in the Jewish body kit, with boxes of blazer active.
        3. Zefr 3 March 2020 08: 49 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          I haven’t been in the tank, but as I see it
          - on the right, the trucks are covered with earth. Tracks of tracks are littered too. Apparently there is a funnel. The tank was covered with a tarp, it was thwarted by an explosion and the rags lie on the left side, and the tank itself was sprinkled. In the back basket were personal items - perhaps prayer rugs, sleeping bags - all this was twisted and thrown away.
          Well, in general, damage is only on the starboard side, a bit.
      3. Polymer 3 March 2020 04: 15 New
        • 7
        • 0
        +7
        The photo is as if this tank was simply thrown into the trash.
        1. Grits 3 March 2020 11: 57 New
          • 1
          • 2
          -1
          Quote: Polymer
          The photo is as if this tank was simply thrown into the trash.

          So these should be thrown away
          1. Essex62 4 March 2020 14: 50 New
            • 0
            • 2
            -2
            This layba will last as much as hell. With us, a global kneading of nata is not expected, and for locales, such as Syrian, just right. Jewish Arabs clobbered on completely antediluvian Shermans, only changing guns and hanging the same luggage carriers. More modern, at that time 54ki.
      4. Ka-52 3 March 2020 05: 09 New
        • 5
        • 1
        +4
        And why are there some rags scattered on the armor

        I think the most plausible explanation is that the ammunition got into the area behind the tank, which housed either a tent or a crew dugout. He smashed it to pieces, scattering personal belongings of the tankers around. Part of this rag is lying near the tank and on the tank itself
      5. Uncle Izya 3 March 2020 22: 00 New
        • 1
        • 4
        -3
        Remote machine gun installation, pay attention to what is not in the t-72
    2. Nikolai Grek 3 March 2020 04: 31 New
      • 3
      • 2
      +1
      Quote: The same Lech
      Where, when, how, by whom and under what circumstances was this tank hit?
      And why is it knocked out? ... so it can be returned to service after repair ... the information in the article is complete jelly.

      Do you have your own correspondents or something, so that there is a sea of ​​information ?? !!! what laughing
    3. loki565 3 March 2020 04: 36 New
      • 5
      • 2
      +3
      Yes, his campaign was covered by the FAB, a tank similar to 0.10s
    4. The leader of the Redskins 3 March 2020 07: 33 New
      • 11
      • 2
      +9
      Apparently, the author is not aware that KAZ is not a panacea for all types of weapons, but the "Ukrainian roots" are clearly savored in the stuffing ...
      1. novel66 3 March 2020 08: 27 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        yeah, FAB 100 on the roof .. what kind of DZ
        1. Grits 3 March 2020 11: 58 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          Quote: novel xnumx
          yeah, FAB 100 on the roof .. what kind of DZ

          Though Ukrainian, even Turkish, even Martian ..
          1. novel66 3 March 2020 12: 41 New
            • 6
            • 0
            +6
            no, well, against the Martian already 250
    5. Dreamboat 3 March 2020 21: 09 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Article confusion. What does KAZ and DZ have to do with it? Two completely different types of armor.
    6. tatarin_ru 3 March 2020 23: 01 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      The information in the article is full of jelly.


      It seems the whole article for the sake of this line

      At the same time, tanks with clearly outdated dynamic protection “Contact-1” continue to be used in Russia
    7. Zaurbek 4 March 2020 10: 02 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      They write, as a result of a bomb strike .... where a bomb fell nearby.
  2. Nehist 3 March 2020 02: 30 New
    • 11
    • 2
    +9
    Um ... What's so strange? No tank has protection against air attacks if hit
    1. Same lech 3 March 2020 02: 36 New
      • 6
      • 1
      +5
      No tank has protection against air attacks if hit

      And who attacked him from the air? ... an airplane, a drone, a turntable, or just a mine from above fell on him smile . What was the striking ammunition?
      1. Nehist 3 March 2020 02: 45 New
        • 2
        • 1
        +1
        Well, definitely not a mine, in that case they would have written during a mortar attack. And you did not carefully read it clearly says air raid
        1. Same lech 3 March 2020 02: 53 New
          • 1
          • 2
          -1
          And you did not carefully read it clearly says air raid

          smile It may very well be ... and if it was not an air raid?
          This is not written on the tank ... damage on one side only and then the rags on the tank during the explosion should have been dropped or burned ... this is not visible here. what
          1. carstorm 11 3 March 2020 03: 24 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            something shrapnel and a decent size. look at the radar unit and the machine gun. I suspect the NURSs and one of them from the starboard side went into the MTO.
        2. Nikolai Grek 3 March 2020 04: 34 New
          • 4
          • 0
          +4
          Quote: Nehist
          it clearly says air raid

          it is still necessary to find out where this information came from the one who "wrote" this "article" here !!! wink
      2. Zoldat_A 3 March 2020 02: 53 New
        • 6
        • 1
        +5
        Quote: The same Lech

        And who attacked him from the air? ... an airplane, a drone, a turntable, or just a mine from above fell on him smile . What was the striking ammunition?


        Thunder of heaven ... laughing
        1. bessmertniy 3 March 2020 03: 54 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Well, somehow mutually. Since the Turks from the air beat the Syrian technology, then air strikes went on Turkish technology. negative
  3. Incvizitor 3 March 2020 02: 35 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    So any tank can be destroyed from the air, and such a kaz is not an assistant here, that this ancient sabra, that is 90 modern.
    Sorry not completely destroyed with the crew.
  4. aszzz888 3 March 2020 02: 46 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Arrived and (-) another janissary tank. Whether protection worked or not - ??? or printed on top ???
  5. Graz 3 March 2020 03: 13 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    serious damage is not visible in this photo, it would be more if a direct hit would have blown it apart, and then it was chopped off by fragments
  6. maidan.izrailovich 3 March 2020 03: 36 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    Tank is good. But you have to "land" the planes.
  7. Retvizan 8 3 March 2020 03: 37 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    It’s not a fact that the tank was destroyed, there were no traces of burning, only attachments were cut by fragments, it seems that something like a land mine exploded to the right, behind the tank.
    And why so many rags on the armor is not clear, is the crew nervous after the explosion, the diapers are dried?)))
    1. Graz 3 March 2020 04: 06 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      rather, the junk was packed and stored on the tank and secured, I won’t be surprised if the junk was jammed, and with a nearby explosion it all reshuffled and scattered
      1. Zeev Zeev 3 March 2020 07: 05 New
        • 0
        • 3
        -3
        The building block is also marauded? Most likely the tank drove through some sort of Arab hut.
  8. svp67 3 March 2020 04: 18 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    I wonder which BTRZ installed the DZ a, la T-80 blocks on the T-72? You rarely see this on the tanks of the Russian army, and I understand the power and beauty, but in light of the recent battles in Syria, you cannot violate the BUSV and put the tanks so tight on the defensive, you can cover them with a single UAV attack or artillery fire raid
    1. Andrei Nikolaevich 3 March 2020 07: 15 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      You don’t understand anything in ,, Turkish military strategy ,,) But they do a good chirrup.
  9. Alien From 3 March 2020 04: 39 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Salom gosyanki forgot to grease the brothers, that’s the opportunity came out ......)))
  10. Olddetractor 3 March 2020 05: 18 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    And from what camp was beaten off?
  11. master 52 3 March 2020 05: 42 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    and where does the t-72av for those places where it is used it is enough for his eyes
  12. Rafaell 3 March 2020 05: 47 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    In the Soviet army, it was forbidden to wear rings, but here the leader of firing with a wedding ring. Maybe I got something wrong.
  13. rotmistr60 3 March 2020 06: 44 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    This KAZ was created on the basis of Zaslon-L, developed in Ukraine
    Today, the Ukrainian national court shouts that it is necessary to unite with Turkey against Russia and go to Syria to fight. About the tank - in war, as in war. Or want lossless?
  14. Zeev Zeev 3 March 2020 07: 04 New
    • 5
    • 4
    +1
    Are you sure the tank is down? For I already saw one such photograph, and what is interesting, it was with the M-60 tank, modernized in Israel (to be completely accurate, with the Magah6 Bet tank). One acquaintance showed what his tank looked like after participating in one of the anti-terrorist operations in the early 2000s in Samaria. His tank drove into the village, where the "civilians" took out all the monitoring devices with heavy fire from automatic weapons, and even slammed the turret from the RPG, after which the young tank commander quietly fell into a stupor, and the driver, without waiting for the order, stupidly rode forward through the houses of the village. After a breakthrough into the open area, their tank looked exactly that way: with a torn spare part, with broken-down fenders, with linen, broken furniture and building blocks on armor.
  15. Andrei Nikolaevich 3 March 2020 07: 10 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    You can only buy pork from forelocks .. Yes, and half in chemistry .. If not all.
    1. ZaharoFF 4 March 2020 08: 14 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      I would not risk it
  16. Topol M 3 March 2020 07: 57 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    To a light bulb what kind of protection does the tank have, any tank with any advanced protection is designed for a maximum of two fights. There is no reception against scrap. From the top view it is not protected at all
  17. Ratmir_Ryazan 3 March 2020 08: 10 New
    • 0
    • 5
    -5
    Turkey bypasses Russia not only in the development of UAVs, but even KAZ for tanks.
    A shame.
  18. Konatantin 1992 3 March 2020 08: 13 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    Ahhhhh, it’s like the tank in this photo was allegedly destroyed by the Russian Aerospace Forces, I met such data. So if it was a T-90 A, M, and some other tank with KAZ, then the aircraft would also destroy it. The fact is that a certain amount of M60 Sabra with KAZ Pulat was in Syria back in 2019, it’s hard to judge the effectiveness (not enough data), but several cars were destroyed by ATGMs (what did you want? KAZ is essentially a copy of the Barrier and the most European country in the world) but in general, the tank was adequately modernized by Israel (a cannon-like cannon, a 1000 hp engine, a modern control system, protection is higher than the usual M60 at times, a good help against the T-62 (M-1), T-55 , T-72 M, M1 and even the first T-72 B3 (model 2011), it’s another matter that they weren’t heavily used against tanks on the Syrian LDP (and di be) and ATGM. and if it had, and even improper use of tanks in principle .... Well, you get the idea.
  19. sledak 3 March 2020 08: 34 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    [/ Quote]
    And why are there some rags scattered on the armor - like in a reserved seat car after a drunken shift worker .... [/ quote]

    As in the car airbags, only worked out wink
  20. Kapkan 3 March 2020 10: 01 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    And what is the essence of the claims of the author of the article to the Contact system? If it was sloppy or “terribly” ineffective, then it would have been cut out from tanks long ago. .Yes, not modern, yes, not fashionable, but it works and protects from what it should be. Oh, these sofa-chair analysts ...
  21. Alexey from Perm 3 March 2020 13: 42 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Military review will soon turn into a humorous one.
  22. Phoenix 4 March 2020 01: 46 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    And what does Russia and contact1 have to do with it? What article in one line?
  23. ZaharoFF 4 March 2020 08: 12 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Somehow they threw trunks. In the article, everyone piled in a heap, as in the photo. About nothing. sad
  24. Protos 4 March 2020 17: 18 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: Essex62
    This layba will last as much as hell. With us, a global kneading of nata is not expected, and for locales, such as Syrian, just right. Jewish Arabs clobbered on completely antediluvian Shermans, only changing guns and hanging the same luggage carriers. More modern, at that time 54ki.

    "Antediluvian" Sherman Judeev were rearmament by 90mm. guns of Centurion with his same SLA!
    They clobbered the T-34 \ 85 and SU-85, when the A-55s threw the T to the Arabs, everything changed a lot!
    But Arabs Che do not give ...
    Strongly indicative of the benefits is the fact that in the following wars and until now, Israel has been actively using the T-55!
    And during the Third Indo-Pakistani War, the T-55 bent all classmates in more direct than Arab hands!