On the day of the 150th anniversary of the birth of Lenin: Putin approved the date of the referendum on the Constitution

It became known that the working group on amending the Constitution made a proposal on the date of the referendum. Recall that the question of amending the basic law will be put to a popular vote.

The date of such a vote was proposed to be made on April 22. And just a few minutes ago it became known that Vladimir Putin approved the proposal by date. Information on the support expressed by the president was expressed by the head of the Kremlin press service Dmitry Peskov.

It must be emphasized that April 22 in 2020 is Wednesday. But, as was previously announced, the day of voting will not be a day off, but the state will make it that way. In this case, we can say with confidence that on April 22 this year will be officially a non-working day precisely in connection with the fact that Russians will be expected at polling stations that day.

Earlier, the working group reported that there would be no specification of amendments to the ballot in the referendum. The question will sound something like this: “Do you support changes to the Constitution of Russia?” There are two possible answers: yes and no.

The network responded to the choice of the date of voting, noting that April 22, 2020 is the 150th anniversary of the birth of Vladimir Ulyanov (Lenin).

Comments

[Victor_B]

Did he ask Lenin's grandfather?
Did he enjoy such a birthday present?

[dSK]

There will be no "gift" from me - I will not vote.

[Askold Matveev]

I will go. I’ll go in principle and vote against the adoption of the amendments. At the same time, I’ll celebrate Lenin’s grandfather’s birthday.

[Spektr]

But it is known that Lenin’s real birthday is not April 22. According to the old calendar, he was born on April 10 + 13 days and it turns out according to the new calendar on April 23.

[Tatyana]

The date of such a vote was proposed to be made on April 22. And just a few minutes ago it became known that Vladimir Putin approved the proposal for the date

This is just an unheard of public mockery of the Soviet history of the country and its people!
Ay-yes Putin - ay-yes LIBERAL! So he threw off the mask of the "PEOPLE'S patriot", so he threw it off!

[Victor_B]

Quote: Tatiana

This is just an unheard of public mockery of the Soviet history of the country and its people!

And the fact that the Mausoleum is ALWAYS closed for all parades is a tribute to the memory?

[Tatyana]

Earlier, the working group reported that there would be no specification of amendments to the ballot in the referendum. The question will sound something like this: “Do you support changes to the Constitution of Russia?” There are two possible answers: yes and no.

I knew that in the amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, those in power behind the people would mix honey benefits and impunity for their loved ones and worsening lives for working people!
Vote, good people, as in a strange scumbag unknown to anyone!
The government mobilizes the administrative resource for voting - and everything will be adopted in the Constitution of the Russian Federation!

[bk316]

I knew that in the amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, those in power behind the people would mix honey benefits and impunity for their loved ones and worsening lives for working people!

Well, vote against. What is the question?
Weigh the pros and cons and vote. No administrative resource will change the voting results by more than percent, vote 90% against and there will be no changes.

[Tatyana]

Quote: bk316

Well, vote against. What's the question? Weigh the pros and cons and vote.

What to weigh from? I know some of the amendments, and they suit me. And what comes to their appendage is the mystery behind seven seals.
Do you understand that the provocation of such a vote by the authorities is not at all clear?
Essentially 1,5 months left before the vote! Amendments should be ready and publicly discussed!
Have you seen this somewhere? Me not.
Or do you think that this is not necessary at all? What do the people know and understand what is not at all appropriate?
What will happen in the Constitution of the Russian Federation with the presidency, with the promised State Council? This is essentially a coup in the country!

[Andrey VOV]

Today, we discussed the amendments for three hours, it would be a desire, you will find, and you will read

[Reserve officer]

... "Earlier, the working group announced that there will be no specification of amendments in the ballot at the referendum. The question will sound something like this:" Do you support amendments to the Constitution of Russia? " There are, respectively, two answer options: yes and no "...

Andrei, what's the point of discussing them if there is no specifics in the newsletter? And if I like something, but against something I am categorically against it? How to vote?
Pure profanity is all a vote. And a clear disrespect for the basic law of the state - the Constitution.

[Protos]

Quote: Stock Officer

... "Earlier, the working group announced that there will be no specification of amendments in the ballot at the referendum. The question will sound something like this:" Do you support amendments to the Constitution of Russia? " There are, respectively, two answer options: yes and no "...

Andrei, what's the point of discussing them if there is no specifics in the newsletter? And if I like something, but against something I am categorically against it? How to vote?
Pure profanity is all a vote. And a clear disrespect for the basic law of the state - the Constitution.

The texts of the amendments are ALREADY on the SITE of the Russian government!

[Misha Honest]

Quote: Protos

The texts of the amendments are ALREADY on the SITE of the Russian government!

A reference please. And then I didn’t find anything there.

[Tatyana]

Quote: Reserve officer

Andrei, what's the point of discussing them if there is no specifics in the newsletter? And if I like something, but against something I am categorically against it? How to vote?Pure profanity is all a vote. And a clear disrespect for the basic law of the state - the Constitution.

Yes, it is the purest PROFANATION - all this is a vote! Or rather, it is precisely the legitimization of a creeping coup d'etat "from above" in a beautiful wrapper on the introduction of a certain State Council and under sweet speeches for the people.

[andrew42]

PROFANATION, - I completely agree. Here, even on TV, I accidentally saw a fragment of the discussion of the amendments with Putin: a certain madame proposed to introduce into the Constitution a norm on a decent living wage, - the Guarantor deftly "ricocheted" the issue in the style of "the fools themselves" - let the government decide. What other expectations can there be after that? - Profanity is.

[Victor N]

Discuss before the vote - write, if there is WHAT. And do not have hysteria - there are many opportunities to express your opinion. Even here, in VO no one bothers. Dare!

[bk316]

Andrei, what's the point of discussing them if there is no specifics in the newsletter?

Why are they on the newsletter? They are in a separate law.

Law of the Russian Federation on an amendment to the Constitution of the Russian Federation "On improving regulation of certain issues of organizing public authority"

Bill No. 885214-7

Or do you think when they voted for the previous Constitution, they were put on the ballot?

[Tatyana]

Quote: Andrey VOV

Today, we discussed the amendments for three hours, it would be a desire, you will find, and you will read

Well, here's an example of popular discussion of amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation.

The AMF Discussed Amendments to the Constitution. M.Delyagin 18.02.2020/XNUMX/XNUMX | Yaroslavl.Online

[bk316]

Have you seen this somewhere? Me not.

How much time do you need to read all corrections?
Or do you think that they will not be published before the vote?

[andrew42]

This notorious State Council painfully resembles the "leaders" of the times of Anna Ioannovna - in fact, they got Osterman, Minich and, in the end ... Birena (ie Biron. The question is who will be the "mother-empress" who The President will nod at the lack of authority, State Councilors will steer their loved ones for themselves, and no one will personally answer for anything. Now the guarantor will still have to mumble something on uncomfortable questions, and then it will become unnecessary.

[pl675]

Quote: bk316

I knew that in the amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, those in power behind the people would mix honey benefits and impunity for their loved ones and worsening lives for working people!

Well, vote against. What is the question?
Weigh the pros and cons and vote. No administrative resource will change the voting results by more than percent, vote 90% against and there will be no changes.

Do you still believe in urinotherapy, in cucumbers from hemorrhoids, and Santa Claus? -
then you are in "edro", until they changed the sign, then the entrance will rise in price.

[bk316]

Do you still believe in urinotherapy, in cucumbers from hemorrhoids, and Santa Claus? -

No - I believe, or rather, I am confident in mathematics. AND I KNOW that there are methods AND EVEN I AM ABOUT USING THEM , to determine the falsification of voting results.

Well, people without an appropriate education like you can use urinotherapy .... All the same, it remains either to study for 10 years or to believe

[Bomb]

Then the hangers-on just announced that 64% of the population approved the amendments.

[Victor N]

Very important amendments prepared - Great job!

[Tatyana]

Quote: Victor N

Very important amendments prepared - Great job!

Only here a spoon of tar spoils a barrel of honey!
The functions and composition of the State Council - this "gray horse", this "pig in a poke" - please state!

[bk316]

The functions and composition of the State Council - this "gray horse", this "pig in a poke" - please state!

Tatyana, are you so anxious to wait a week for the law to pass the Duma and be published?
https://sozd.duma.gov.ru/bill/885214-7

[Tatyana]

Quote: bk316

Tatyana, can’t you wait to wait a week for the law to pass the Duma and be published? Https: //sozd.duma.gov.ru/bill/885214-7

And after that you can change something there ?!
The functions of the State Council should be clear now, and not later. And so we have every reason to suspect the introduction of dual power in the country. This is already tested in 1917, the path to anarchy and the collapse of the country.

[bk316]

And after that you can change something there ?!

You cannot change either before or after, but you can vote for or against.
If voted against, the law will not be enforced.
Or do you want the laws to include only those norms that you like? This does not happen, it is always a balance of interests, and you can choose whether such a balance suits you or not.

Well, by golly it’s even uncomfortable to tell such basics, just like a child
Do not be offended ....

[Tatyana]

I am simply amazed at your "EdRonov" liberal chicanery!
As if you don’t understand what was going on!
Only the Enemy of the people can speak and mock that way!

[bk316]

I am simply amazed at your "EdRonov" liberal chicanery!

Is this you to?

[Spektr]

Tatyana, what specific amendments do you dislike? At least one point? More specifically, please: addresses, passwords, appearances ...

[Tatyana]

Quote: Spectrum

Tatyana, what specific amendments do you dislike? At least one point?

The functions of the new body of state power introduced by the Constitution - the State Council - are not defined.
It was said that the State Council would be created on the basis of the Public Council under the President of the Russian Federation and the State Duma of the Russian Federation
If earlier the members of the Public Council worked on a voluntary basis — Pugacheva even went in there — now all this shushera will receive a salary - and not a small one (!), - and will not answer for anything. And how will they get there? Just by invitation.

Well, for example. Elena Yampolskaya - Chairman of the State Duma Committee of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation on Culture since July 25, 2018 - dragged singer and musician Makarevich to one of the committees of the State Duma of the State Duma! For what are his merits to Russia and its people? And simply, in her words, to reflect the diversity of existing opinions in the country!

Look at the composition of all these Public Councils - these are liberal musicians, artists, journalists, writers, anti-Soviet dissidents, "Gaidarists" of perestroika times (Svanidze, Lyudmila Alekseeva, economist-privatizer Yasin, etc.), etc., in general, Russian liberal intelligentsia.
People who have been knocked out of their professional rut by old age have simply been attached to the state budget trough to feed and balamute water in the country for people's money in the State Council!
How do you like all this? I do not like it at all.

[Spektr]

Quote: Tatiana

If earlier the members of the Public Council worked on a voluntary basis — Pugacheva even went in there — now all this shushera will receive a salary - and not a small one (!), - and will not answer for anything.

Based on what such conclusions? The child has not yet been born and the gender is still unknown ...

[Tatyana]

Quote: Spectrum

The child has not yet been born and the gender is still unknown ..

On ultrasound, the sex of the unborn child is already visible! So here - it is already possible to imagine what kind of functional orientation this State Council will be born.

[Spektr]

If the fetus has not yet formed, what kind of ultrasound? Banal Fantasy. The bomb has not yet exploded, and the fragments are already being collected.

[Spektr]

I see. If there’s nothing to answer, get a minus.

[Spektr]

Zadolbali these "clairvoyants" still have nothing, but they already know everything, they were everywhere, they themselves go to the toilet ...

[Victor N]

Well, you so squealing ?! Unpleasant ... You can send your suggestions. In the USSR, I sent proposals on the laws under discussion - and received answers. Everyone has a chance to be heard, it must be used. You are here at VO try to clearly state what you are offering. And it’s impossible to understand the essence behind your emotions.

[U-58]

Do you have such a brush?
What, to the jesters, suggestions?
All the fuss started to create a new management chair for a new leader

[Spektr]

And where is it reflected in the amendments, what you said? The amendments have not yet been made public, but already a lot of negativity. One amendment already covers all the nagging about this, the one that "says" that no one can command Russia from the West. Therefore, even before the promulgation of all the amendments, there is such hysteria of an incomprehensible riffraff around the basic law of the country. You are trying in vain, Russia will still get rid of the yoke of Naglo-Saxon influence. You at least get away, but after April 22 Russia will send all sorts of eiders there, shmyagi forest and further.

[Lannan Shi]

Quote: Spectrum

One amendment already covers all the nagging about this - the one that "says" that no one can command Russia from the West.

While the guarantor's friends buy bundles of apartments in London, villas in France, yachts in the Caribbean, they keep money in Switzerland and families in Spain, neither 1 amendment, nor 101, force them to act in the interests of Russia.
Dixi.

[Spektr]

I duplicate my comment to the addressee (the site engine is also the provocateur by redirecting comments).
And where is it reflected in the amendments, what you said? The amendments have not yet been made public, but already a lot of negativity. One amendment already covers all the nagging about this, the one that "says" that no one can command Russia from the West. Therefore, even before the promulgation of all the amendments, there is such hysteria of an incomprehensible riffraff around the basic law of the country. You are trying in vain, Russia will still get rid of the yoke of Naglo-Saxon influence. You at least get away, but after April 22 Russia will send all sorts of eiders there, shmyagi forest and further.

[Spektr]

This comment above is addressed U-58, but the site engine throws it from the response position to the general branch. What's this? So conceived? Administrators, what a setup. And this is not the first mess of the site. The site engine set me up under the ban with my randomize answers. Or so get rid of those who did not like the moderators? This is mean.

[Spektr]

Quote: U-58

Do you have such a brush?
What, to the jesters, suggestions?

All the fuss started to create a new management chair for a new leader

This is the third attempt to comment on your ...
And where is it reflected in the amendments, what you said? The amendments have not yet been made public, but already a lot of negativity. One amendment already covers all the nagging about this, the one that "says" that no one can command Russia from the West. Therefore, even before the promulgation of all the amendments, there is such hysteria of an incomprehensible riffraff around the basic law of the country. You are trying in vain, Russia will still get rid of the yoke of Naglo-Saxon influence. You at least get away, but after April 22 Russia will send all sorts of eiders there, shmyagi forest and further.

[SARANCHA1976]

listen to you here 50/50 half drinks - half latent (and maybe real)

[Victor_B]

Quote: karabass

In any orthodox society, 2% of men are homosexual

... according to homosexual scholars.
Or rather, some rating agencies, such as the Levada Center (a foreign agent - officially), which are most likely led by homosexuals. They did not conduct a survey among miners, combine operators, locksmiths and welders, but among creative parties, and there they underestimated because there really will be 50%.
Fool our brother!

I believe that nobody will read me apart from Karabas.
The topic has already drowned.

[Victor_B]

Looks cool ...

[Sergey Averchenkov]

You know, but I would write ... Without any bite.

[Victor_B]

Quote: Sergey Averchenkov

You know, but I would write ... Without any bite.

And disperse half of the "artists"!
For!
(Practice plz (!) The calculation procedure and what to do with the calculated next?)
And so yes! Many need to present a filthy broom!
By the way, not only "praative".

[lucul]

And disperse half of the "artists"!

It would not hurt .....

[Sergey Averchenkov]

I can’t understand you. Do you want to suggest that I sleep with some man, and not with my wife? Have your brains atrophied? . And yes, I suggest to enter.

[astepanov]

Quote: Sergey Averchenkov

I can’t understand you. Do you want to suggest that I sleep with some man, and not with my wife? Have your brains atrophied? . And yes, I suggest to enter.

Those. you want to say that if the Constitution does not have a separate article against homosexuality, then you have to become this ... how is it ...? I think that with a high degree of probability such an amendment in the Basic Law will not be. So get ready.

[Sergey Averchenkov]

I don’t want to write anything in, or write it in, you’re so tired of me, you don’t even imagine ... Pederasts.

[nikvic46]

Alexei. You are right. You cannot make a moral treatise from the Constitution.

[Sergey Averchenkov]

You are right, something has incurred me. But such an article would not be out of place. It’s just that our country would be ... normal - a man, a woman, children ...

[Aag]

Yes, yes, yes !!! You also need to enter so that you do not urinate past the toilet ...

[Nyrobsky]

Quote: karabass

Please decipher it. WHAT do you mean? Do you propose to include a separate article against homosexuals in the Basic Law?

Sorry, of course, but I mean that the Constitution proposes to consolidate the concept that "a family is a marriage between a man and a woman," which further excludes any options like "parent # 1" and "parent # 2" under koi you can bring the marriage of two numbered homosexuals, or two numbered lesbians, which is now practiced in Europe and the United States. Are you against?

[Nyrobsky]

Well, as it were, the person didn’t reveal the topic, but on the whole the message was correct - he was a vegetable, not our Russian family.

[SARANCHA1976]

can you at least clearly say what kind of changes are in front of such rebuffs full of righteous anger?

[Ross xnumx]

Quote: Spectrum

According to the old calendar, he was born on April 10 + 13 days and it turns out according to the new calendar on April 23.

But what’s Lenin’s birthday there ... It’s necessary to postpone Christmas on January 8 ... And the day of the fulfillment of the Sunday - on November 8 ...
So they didn’t have time to ask you ... And maybe they asked ... Yes, in your ears the sunflowers are stuck ...

[Malyuta]

Quote: Spectrum

But it is known that Lenin’s real birthday is not April 22. According to the old calendar, he was born on April 10 + 13 days and it turns out according to the new calendar on April 23.

Priests often confused metrics.

[rruvim]

In general, Ilya Nikolayevich Ulyanov (Lenin's father) was a serious person, he understood the metrics worse than priests. And if Maria Alexandrovna Blank decided to appoint a date of birth for her child on April 10, then no priest would have opposed this. Kabbalah however ... And were there any priests? There is no evidence that infant Volodimir was baptized.

[Malyuta]

Quote: rruvim

Kabbalah however ...

The first episode of the serial film "The Sealed Carriage" or "Bloody Lenin Drinking Blood Directly from Children". from the trilogy "About Three Spikelets".
A colleague, believe me, in the pedigrees of Lavrov, Mishustin and other non-Dimonov there is a much more interesting texture study.

[rruvim]

Of course have. I mean, to argue about whether Vladimir Ilyich was born on the evening of April 9 or in the morning of the 10th, those who are interested in zodiac or kabalistic moments can. For ignorant of these nuances of mankind, the date of birth of the Leader in a drum.

[Spektr]

Quote: Malyuta

Priests often confused metrics.

But after all, according to the old style and all the documents, Ulyanov-Lenin was born on April 10, and then according to the new one, what number is obtained?

[Yu-81]

But it is known that Lenin’s real birthday is not April 22. According to the old calendar, he was born on April 10 + 13 days and it turns out according to the new calendar on April 23.

26.01.1918/XNUMX/XNUMX The Council of People's Commissars adopted a decree on the transition to the Western European calendar. Recalculation is carried out depending on the century:
20th century +13 days
19th century +12 days
18th century +11 days
In what century was Lenin born? At 19. Therefore, you need to add 12 days, not 13. But this is not known to grammars from mathematics and history. Therefore, fools celebrate November 4, although on this day nothing significant happened in history. He didn’t make out the same grammar + 13 days, without regard to in which century the event happened and was normal, so there it will come down!

[Magog]

Therefore, fools celebrate November 4, although on this day nothing significant happened in history.

"RG Skrynnikov notes not only a number of chronological inconsistencies in existing sources, but also a direct revision of the Siberian chronicles, for example, the Byzantine events taken from the" Moscow Chronograph "of 1512, with their replacement by the Moscow Troubles of 1612, when This replaces the confrontation between the Byzantines and the Bulgarians with the confrontation between the Poles, on the one hand, and Muscovites with the Germans (!), on the other. " And what really happened - go and figure it out ...

[Spektr]

Quote: yu-xnumx

26.01.1918/XNUMX/XNUMX The Council of People's Commissars adopted a decree on the transition to the Western European calendar. Recalculation is carried out depending on the century:
20th century +13 days
19th century +12 days
18th century +11 days
In what century was Lenin born? At 19. Therefore, you need to add 12 days, not 13. But this is not known to grammars from mathematics and history. Therefore, fools celebrate November 4, although on this day nothing significant happened in history. He didn’t make out the same grammar + 13 days, without regard to in which century the event happened and was normal, so there it will come down!

Now the street is the 21st century, it means + 14, and then it leaves on April 24th. Cool!
And Christmas +0? Century is zero. Or + 13. Cool arithmetic.
So the Nativity of Christ on December 25th or January 7th?

[Naz]

The party said 22, which means 22. And then +, -.

[Dmitry Potapov]

Correctly!!! And it will be a worthy response of a free citizen!

[Victor_B]

Quote: Dmitry Potapov

Correctly!!! And it will be a worthy response of a free citizen!

I am embarrassed to ask - actually to whom or what did you answer so freely?
Or what?

[Spektr]

Quote: Victor_B

Quote: Dmitry Potapov

Correctly!!! And it will be a worthy response of a free citizen!

I am embarrassed to ask - actually to whom or what did you answer so freely?
Or what?

This engine or site operator shuffles the answers as he pleases. I got into a ban like this (a man insulted me, but wrote to another, I answered him, although the answer was slipped and as a result the ban got both. That's how the elect are pushed foreheads. The owner of the site is from the Promised Land). Keep this in mind do not fall into the trap of the owners of the site.

[figwam]

Quote: Askold Matveev

I will go. I’ll go in principle and vote against the adoption of the amendments.

In your opinion, let officials remain dual citizenship, and the laws of NATO countries will be higher than ours? And the constitution is unchanged - Yeltsin, pah.

[Askold Matveev]

amendments to the constitution cannot be corrected. I think we need to adopt a completely new constitution of our country.

[figwam]

Quote: Askold Matveev

amendments to the constitution cannot be corrected. I think we need to adopt a completely new constitution of our country.

Unfortunately, if you vote against, they will not accept the new constitution.

[Misha Honest]

Quote: figvam

Unfortunately, if you vote against, they will not accept the new constitution.

In any case, no one will accept a new one. Until the power changes ...
But now, just like air, we need exactly a completely new constitution.

[Private89]

They do not comply with this constitution, why will they become after the amendments? In the Russian Federation, the social state is written in the constitution. The people in this social state are dying. Subsoil belongs to the people - a law has been passed by which it is possible to lease subsoil. And so where do not spit. And the essence of all the amendments is to push the state council and sit there as a pharaoh. They carry out pension reform, face taxes and still want us to legitimize their power forever.

[spirit]

So the question is all that everything is presented in a row, that separately for each amendment to the GDP the bench press can be made) and so it looks like a handout for the mob here is ours and yours a bit

[Sotskiy]

Quote: spirit

So the question is that everything is presented in a row, that individually, for each amendment to the GDP, the bench press can be done)

Look what you’ve conceived separately! We have a market in our yard. No disinterested relationship! So only wholesale. Oh! The general list.
The people are amendments that are already in fact spelled out in federal laws (who would implement them), and the top-power. So everything is fair, market

[Malyuta]

Quote: spirit

So the question is all that everything is presented in a row, that separately for each amendment to the GDP the bench press can be made) and so it looks like a handout for the mob here is ours and yours a bit

This is called the tops for you, and the roots for us!

[Nikolai Grek]

Quote: spirit

that individually for each amendment

Well then you yourself will whine that a bunch of buzhki will have to be taken apart !!

[Victor N]

Write, major, write! Right here and now! Or nothing?

[Victor N]

So nothing ....

[Ross xnumx]

Quote: figvam

In your opinion, let officials remain dual citizenship

You already forgot that the whole procedure was contemplated for the establishment of the State Council.
In normal documents, each amendment is voted separately. And only flies are beaten together:
"Seven - in one stroke" ...
And at the end of the term, all these Putin’s “quacks” look like convulsions ... We did not accept the Yeltsin’s constitution (the Soviet suited it), but we were forced to live on it. And they voted against the dissolution of the USSR, but they did everything at the instigation ...
In a word, look so that you do not get 146 percent ...

[U-58]

Well, about 146 you turned down, but 76% - they definitely will.
They know how ...

[Private89]

And what is stopping now “our” authorities from simply not signing those treaties that are not beneficial for the country and not entering into those structures that limit sovereignty, not to mention the absence of an entry in the constitution?

[figwam]

Quote: Private 89

And what is stopping "our" government now from simply not signing those treaties,

The current Constitution does not allow.

[Romey]

Are you also an admirer of the creatures of the wife of Fedorov?

[figwam]

Quote: romey

Are you also an admirer of the creatures of the wife of Fedorov?

What is the wife of Fedorov?

[Malyuta]

Quote: figvam

Quote: romey

Are you also an admirer of the creatures of the wife of Fedorov?

What is the wife of Fedorov?

The ideologist of GCD, such as dibs from Putin's squads.

[Genry]

Quote: Malyuta

The ideologist of GCD, such as dibs from Putin's squads.

Well manifested ....
Now it remains to find out what territory you are broadcasting from.

[Romey]

Flag in hand. Find out. Just do not be surprised that from Voronezh, which must be bombed.

[SARANCHA1976]

Do you really think that the whole government will rise and leave?

[figwam]

Quote: SARANCHA1976

Do you really think that the whole government will rise and leave?

Where were you when the entire Medvedev government resigned?

[Romey]

Well, and who came to replace the departed? Ghouls are worse than before. Especially the author of the ege delivered ...

[figwam]

Quote: romey

Well, and who came to replace the departed? Ghouls are worse than before. Especially the author of the ege delivered ...

You chose Zelensky for yourself, and deal with him, but do not meddle in our affairs.

[Romey]

Native American hut, and how many do you take upon yourself, deprive me of citizenship?

[figwam]

Quote: romey

Native American hut, and how many do you take upon yourself, deprive me of citizenship?

How many do you have?

[Romey]

One thing. RF And you? Two? Three? Or just a residence permit, like your Shapiro?

[Bomb]

Changing the government is like waving a newspaper over shit, flies are removed, buzzing, and then they sit back.

[SARANCHA1976]

Meant the government and not the Cabinet.

[bk316]

Do you really think that the whole government will rise and leave?

Uh ... So it already went that way. Encore again?

[DymOk_v_dYmke]

Quote: figvam

In your opinion, let officials remain dual citizenship, and the laws of NATO countries will be higher than ours?

Most are for the prohibition of dual citizenship.
However, there is also a "squiggle" here: isn't there a ban on dual citizenship by cleaning up "glades" for themselves by those
who without formal second citizenship have the right to receive it at any time?
Semibankirshchina can be remembered ...

[AUL]

The fact of the matter is that, under the guise of a couple of really necessary amendments, a number of positions are introduced to us that legitimize the existing lawlessness. As a result, the overall result of these amendments will not be in our favor. Therefore, everything is taken to the vote in bulk, and not for each amendment specifically. Therefore, I will vote against this scam.

[SARANCHA1976]

Very accurate definition.

[Nikolay Ivanov_5]

And will you even read constitutional amendments?

[astepanov]

So, on April 2, the amendments should be considered in the second reading. Not the fact that they will. Then they should hone the wording, agree with the text of the current Constitution ... Then they should be studied, reviewed and approved in all subjects of the federation. Suppose, still two weeks. Then they must publish so that the people think it over. Some more time will go. And there will be time to think about everything, nothing. But this is the Constitution, not some kind of nonsense. And then the vote - in bulk, and among good initiatives you can cram as much as you want complete nonsense, or even completely noose. Something seems to me that, under the guise of Putin's initiatives, they want to give us rotten fish in the appendage. In the bazaar, this is usually done: on top is a good product, and under it ...

[kjhg]

Quote: astepanov

Something seems to me that, under the guise of Putin's initiatives, they want to give us rotten fish in the appendage. In the bazaar, this is usually done: on top is a good product, and under it ...

Believe me, it does not seem to you. All this is started precisely for this purpose. But sheep are never destined to understand that they are kept for wool and meat.

[RideMaster]

You want him to believe the unfounded comment. Not a single fact, but only a stamp about rams. Yes, you my friend propagandist.

[SARANCHA1976]

From the series, life will become better but you still have to walk with panties on your head .. And you stand so thoughtful;)

[Spektr]

Quote: SARANCHA1976

From the series, life will become better but you still have to walk with panties on your head .. And you stand so thoughtful;)

The engine will throw out the response branches anyway, so I quote.
And here is the answer to you opus.
"The Russians put a record amount on their current accounts in banks in 2019, the share of individuals' funds increased to 26% of the total volume of attracted retail resources.
Thus, in total equivalent, the amount of funds of Russians in current accounts has reached 8 trillion rubles. In 2018, the figures were 19,4% lower. "
Where’s Ben’s underpants?

[SARANCHA1976]

The percentage of Russians who put them do not want to voice?

[smart ass]

I remember that there were also working groups and voting on pension reform .... everyone knows the result

[knn54]

-It should be emphasized that April 22 in 2020 is Wednesday.
Petka writes an ad: "The division's party meeting will take place on Tuesday" "Asks Vasily Ivanovich:
-: How correct is Tuesday or Tuesday?
Vasily Ivanovich (leafing through the spelling dictionary):
- In the dictionary with the letter "f" there is no such word at all! Write: "The division's party meeting will take place on Wednesday" ...

[Campanella]

The dilemma, the old constitution is bad, the new one is not clear for whom it is written ... It will be necessary to think hard.

[snake]

Quote: Askold Matveev

I will go. I’ll go in principle and vote against the adoption of the amendments.

No need to walk. The authorities will draw only the result they need (for the first time or what?). But by going to the "elections", you ensure the legitimization of this very circus called "elections". The people should "keep silent" and not play games with swindlers, in which the outcome is predetermined by swindlers in their favor.

[SARANCHA1976]

Then apply the default settings;)

[bayard]

Quote: Askold Matveev

I’ll go and vote against the adoption of the amendments.

So you, young man, for Russia to continue payments on all fake claims of the so-called international jurisdictions?
Stockholm Arbitration Court?
And Khodorkovsky is ready from the state 50 billion dollars. to break off?
Ukraine is very encouraged by such prospects.
And Poland presented something there ... for the war and "occupation", will file a lawsuit - they will satisfy, like Ukraine.
With joy .
And glee.
And to the Balts, if they are served, they are sitting without money, Europe is tired of feeding them, but through lawsuits to breed Russia - that’s it. Do not even hesitate.
Do you remember with kagoy readiness and enthusiasm IMMEDIATELY the claim of Iran against Russia for not delivered (by Medvedev's decision) S-300 air defense system was satisfied?

As I understand it, you insist on such a strand of things?

Have you thought well about your choice?
Or what liberal-patriotic wind blew your ears.
Or do you have nothing to do with Russia?
It seems like that.

And grandfather Lenin, .... is capitalized, for it is a pseudonym \ party nickname of V.I. Ulyanov (Lenin).

[SARANCHA1976]

Take off your pink glasses if the court is not in our favor and we won’t give money, they will take away property and assets abroad and they won’t scratch that our law will be more important

[bayard]

Only an obligation to subordinate Russian legislation to international law gives supranational courts the power to pass such sentences. They can confiscate Russian property under the LAW only thanks to our consent, our international obligations.
If the constitutional norms of the Russian Federation directly PROHIBIT such practice, it will be "their word against ours." And attempts to alienate property - without limit and direct CRIME in accordance with the Constitution of the Russian Federation.
Do you understand?
Thanks to amendments to its Constitution, Russia will be able to denounce ALL international obligations contrary to its Constitution.
Including the law on the Central Bank.
Do you even remember who wrote the Constitution to us in 1993? And under what circumstances?
They wrote such a thing there that their consulting companies are still writing laws / bills to us.
For the Duma!
Do you really think this is normal?
Me not .
Or do you like juvenile justice after all?
But you will not send this trash out of the country - the Constitution does not allow, like many other things ... does not allow.
After editing - will allow.
Only for one such opportunity is to terminate shameful obligations; these amendments must be accepted.
Do not follow the crowd hysteria, think with your own head.
Leisurely .
Attentively and responsibly.

After the pension reform, you began to think so radically?
And why did it become possible?
Indeed, just a couple of weeks before the raised liberals' sabbath (for its adoption), Putin clearly announced that he considered this reform to be untimely and that there was money in the budget for retirement. Why did they sell it all the same?
Because Russia was OBLIGED to accept it.
Plus an ultimatum about mass attacks in the football championship.

Therefore, I ask again:
DO NOT YOU CHANGE ANYTHING?

[Llur]

It makes absolutely no difference whether you vote or not, your appearance is important. Do you really think that the choice of the population has any significance for the government? Not the choice is important, the turnout is important - then the vote is recognized as valid. And if the people completely ignore it, then the authorities will have problems ...

[Spektr]

What points of changes in the constitution do you dislike. Specifically and with the indication of the text, and keep general phrases like "truncated" with you. There is still no specific data on the amendments, and clairvoyants from the sub-Penguinists are already throwing a liquid consistency at the fan in full. At least you try for it, but Russia will still come out from under the influence of the sub-dynasty from across the ocean.

[Bomb]

Not for that, the muzhuhuks came up with amendments so that some peasants would spoil everything with their votes. They will.

[Roman070280]

I will go. I’ll go in principle and vote against the adoption of the amendments. At the same time, I’ll celebrate the birthday of Grandfather Lenin.

The only right decision !!
We must go .. but indulge these crooks - in no case ..

[Llur]

The only right decision is not to vote at all. You cannot beat the devil by playing by his rules.

[Ilya-spb]

Cheers, comrades!

All to vote!

You give the April theses!

Earth - to the peasants!
Factories to the workers!
Peace to the nations!

[Victor_B]

Quote: Ilya-spb

You give the April theses!

By the way, yes!
A great idea!
In the sense of the term.

[Malyuta]

Quote: Victor_B

By the way, yes! An excellent idea! In the sense of the term.

For sure, they ate everyone to come out with posters and accordions. To celebrate their birthday, but not to vote

[Private89]

And power to the councils!

[pl675]

Quote: Private 89

And power to the council of the cooperative and judoka!

[pl675]

Quote: Ilya-spb

Cheers, comrades!

All to vote!

You give the April theses!

Earth - to the peasants!
Factories to the workers!
Peace to the nations!

logging allowed !.
seaweed on the way!

[SARANCHA1976]

Do not tell me where to get coupons for deadwood?

[rruvim]

The voting results - the media!

[Nehist]

Along the way, there will be one thesis in this vote!
CROSSES to earthlings

[Malyuta]

And I will vote for Vladimir Ilyich instead of Vladimir vladimirych!
Long live the USSR! Workers of All Countries Unite !!!
NO PASARAN !!!

[Lontus]

Quote from dsk

There will be no "gift" from me - I will not vote.

The boycott strategy is untenable.
Faking the turnout is easier than the outcome of the protest vote.
Do not forget about exit polls - only a person who went to the site can affect them, and it is harder and more impossible for rogues to control exit polls in the areas.
The man whose voice was stolen is more active and meaner than the boycott.
Voting against delivers orders of magnitude more problems to crooks than a boycott.
It is possible to control the voting process more efficiently, where there is a significant protest population who came to the polls.
In addition, the political culture of the population is increasing.

[U-58]

Do not go
That is, vote for?
And I will go and vote. Against

[Igoresha]

There will be no "gift" from me - I will not vote.

gray mass which is not citizens but population argued with songs and enthusiasm, like tse bulo in Ukraine with the election of Zelensky and his gang of lay people. They will again be fooled and rightly so, and smart people who do not participate in scam will stay at home and play on the computer for pleasure.

[Svarog]

The network responded to the choice of the date of voting, noting that April 22, 2020 is the 150th anniversary of the birth of Vladimir Ulyanov (Lenin).

Yeah, if he had returned the Constitution of 1936, it would have seemed harmonious ..
I thought he would approve on April 1 .. since April 1, I don’t believe anyone ..

[bk316]

Yeah, if he had returned the Constitution of 1936, it would have seemed harmonious ..

For some reason, I am completely sure that you would be against it then.
Would come up with something ...

[depressant]

It’s already broken my brains to come up with versions of why such a rush and what it all means. Smoke screen? But for what? They say that Edro is being thrown out of wolf incarnations into a human being, the name changes, charter, composition. Having hidden fangs and claws, he goes to the elections of the 21st year under a new guise - they think, we will not recognize. Putin is changing the constitution without changing its anti-people nature. Werewolf edros and vampire oligarchs. Was the Hunter looming on the horizon?

[DymOk_v_dYmke]

Quote: depressant

Smoke screen? But for what?

This smoke screen has a cadaverous and deceitful smell.

Earlier, the working group reported that there would be no specification of amendments to the ballot in the referendum. The question will sound something like this: “Do you support changes to the Constitution of Russia?” There are two possible answers: yes and no.

The Jesuits are resting.

[kjhg]

Quote: DymOk_v_dYmke

The Jesuits are resting.

But what if they rule?

[pl675]

Was the Hunter looming on the horizon?

rather a polar fox.
Well, I see it, sorry.

[SARANCHA1976]

and according to new amendments to the president, NOBODY can remove anyone except the elections, but he can remove everyone. Our enthusiastic democrats for a couple of handouts with dual citizenship, etc. don't see anything

[AUL]

Quote: SARANCHA1976

and according to new presidential amendments, no one can remove except the election

And the chairman of the State Council is generally no one except the one who appointed him! And no one limits his term of office. And the competence of the State Council is described very vaguely. It becomes clear who this place is being prepared for. Here, basically, because of this, I will vote against! Although there are several sensible amendments.

[smart ass]

Duck sort of like a pack ate all the hunters?

[lucul]

It’s already broken my brains to come up with versions of why such a rush and what it all means.

The revenge was a success .....

[loki565]

Well, one amendment had to be made a long time ago, it was the supremacy of the laws of the country over external ones, as in the USA, China, etc. .. And then all these politicized European courts are already tired, Russia is always to blame for them and it must always pay.

[Eugene-Eugene]

and even an amendment would not hurt - everyone is accountable to the law.

[depressant]

And I am particularly interested in paragraph 10 - on the uniform principles of power in the territory of the Russian Federation. And then Udmurtia stipulated in its Constitution the right to self-determination - what is it anyway? Maybe it’s enough to play the possible independence of the regions and blackmail the central government, extorting extra handouts. Equal, so equal.

[Sky strike fighter]

After this vote, will Constitution Day be celebrated on April 22, not December 12? Do I understand correctly that this will be a new Constitution?

[Servisinzhener]

I doubt it very much. Because amendments are made, and a new constitution is not adopted.

[Sky strike fighter]

Quote: Servisinzhener

I doubt it very much. Because amendments are made, and a new constitution is not adopted.

When hundreds of amendments are introduced and a referendum is called, as in 1993, this is the new Constitution.

[Genry]

Quote: Sky Strike fighter

When hundreds of amendments are introduced and a referendum is called, as in 1993, this is the new Constitution.

The constitution will not be adopted on the day of the popular vote. Later.

[Slavenin82]

Hands and feet FOR !!! For the sake of this amendment, I will go and vote in favor.

[Campanella]

Of course, but the money is unlikely to reach the people.

[rruvim]

This is the only normal amendment. And behind her "back" is a bunch of incomprehensible texts.

[iouris]

I didn’t ask - I was afraid.

[Private89]

Putin and his team are building the antipode of the USSR. I think Lenin would have looked at these figures closely and said nothing, would have called Comrade Dzerzhinsky so that his structure would deal with these counter-revolutionaries.

[Malyuta]

Quote: Private 89

Putin and his team are building the antipode of the USSR. I think Lenin would have looked at these figures closely and said nothing, would have called Comrade Dzerzhinsky so that his structure would deal with these counter-revolutionaries.

To appoint a day for changing the bourgeois constitution, but in fact a constitutional coup with the introduction of the monarchy, is a cynical mockery of our Soviet socialist past.

[New Year day]

Quote: Victor_B

Did he ask Lenin's grandfather?

but he does not ask, he uses everyone and everything

[Paul Siebert]

I watched the film "Union of Salvation" today.
About how, at the end of 1825, the best representatives of the nobility and soldiers of the guard regiments went to die on the Senate Square in St. Petersburg.
For the Constitution.
He looked at the shining eyes of Pestel, Muravyov - the Apostle, Kakhovsky.
These idealists knew - the Constitution, this is the future ...
True, the soldiers in the ranks thought that the Constitution called the wife of the new Sovereign ...
He switched the channel, got into the discussion of amendments to the new Constitution of the Russian Federation. Live.
Displaced persons of the amendment council members. Empty eyes. Nonsense and petty pathos, interspersed with numbers of articles and paragraphs.
I don’t want to highlight anyone. It's my pleasure.
April 22, we will go to vote.
Although the people now, after almost two hundred years, will not understand - what is all this ... What will it give us all ...
Despite all the media resources, universal literacy, propaganda and own views.
I’m going to vote too. According to his conscience. So it is necessary. What this will give us is time will tell.
But to stand aside, grinning, somehow not in Russian ...

[SARANCHA1976]

A film about burning eyes is certainly a strong argument, but if you get acquainted with the real situation and the actions of these "freedom fighters", then only a feeling of disgust will remain. For starters, I can say that out of all the ringleaders directly on the square there were only a few, the rest sat in the corners and waited for what turn things would take.

[Russobel]

Screaming headlines again.
What does Lenin’s birthday have to do with it ?!
If only to connect with something ...
And Putin was born on October 7, the day of the librarian in Armenia ...
What is not a holiday?

[Campanella]

But he wanted to say something by this))) Only we are not fools! Maybe this is a signal that I am yours from the people and for the people)))

[Theodore]

Oh, let the liberals howl!

[Victor_B]

Quote: Theodore

Oh, let the liberals howl!

Well, these are already howling!
Just from "Baba Yaga against".
Even if Putin introduces into the constitution a clause that every liberalist should be given 100 kilo rubles for his birthday, they will be against it!
And on April 22 for them there will be another "day of mourning and remembrance" according to the Yeltsin constitution.

[Svarog]

Quote: Theodore

Oh, let the liberals howl!

Why should they howl, the liberals are changing the Constitution, but the people are howling ..

[Victor_B]

Quote: Svarog

liberals are changing the constitution,

Well, what do you think, besides the liberals, there are also "useful liberals"?
Maybe among them "not all are equally nasty"?

[paul3390]

besides liberals, there are also "useful liberals"

Liberast - can only be useful as a scarecrow in the exposition of the Museum of the World Socialist Revolution ..

[Vladimir16]

Quote: Svarog

Why should they howl, the liberals are changing the Constitution, but the people are howling ..

Are you comfortable with the current one? And you are not a liberalist? Who you are?
Supporters of external control howled from all the cracks.

[Svarog]

Quote: Vladimir16

Quote: Svarog

Why should they howl, the liberals are changing the Constitution, but the people are howling ..

Are you comfortable with the current one? And you are not a liberalist? Who you are?
Supporters of external control howled from all the cracks.

No, the current one doesn’t suit me .. but the guarantor’s life-long rule doesn’t suit me even more. Which, I must say, didn’t pay much attention to the Constitution, but draws it when it’s personally beneficial for him .. I’m not happy with the state council .. and the rest , all changes would be normal if the Constitution were respected ....

[DymOk_v_dYmke]

Quote: Svarog

No, the current one doesn’t suit me .. but the guarantor’s life-long rule doesn’t suit me even more. Which, I must say, didn’t pay much attention to the Constitution, but draws it when it’s personally beneficial for him .. I’m not happy with the state council .. and the rest , all changes would be normal if the Constitution were respected ....

Also, the illegal procedure for making changes does not suit.

[Svarog]

Quote: DymOk_v_dYmke

Also, the illegal procedure for making changes does not suit.

In general, there is some kind of absurdity in all this view .. Let’s take the courts ... the president has repeatedly raised the question that our courts are biased, corrupt and the percentage of acquittals now tends to zero .. and against this background, there will be an amendment, judging by which ordinary citizens of the country will no longer be able to apply to the European Court and sue the state for damages .. It would be perfect justice, well, or close to that, to hell with a European court .. but it turns out that an ordinary citizen can not find protection anywhere. .
Regarding the supremacy of international law .. so it was under the USSR .. and no one wavered .. on this subject Platoshkin is very accessible and simply explains ..
In general, I now have full confidence that this movement, and with such acceleration .., indicates that the president or his entourage really need to make him Elbasy ..
So the illusionist show continues .. I want to twist the twist I want to deceive ..

[DymOk_v_dYmke]

Quote: Svarog

In general, I now have full confidence that this movement, and with such acceleration .., indicates that the president or his entourage really need to make him Elbasy ..
So the illusionist show continues .. I want to twist the twist I want to deceive ..

Other versions do not work.
For it is better to sit than to sit.

[Andrey VOV]

Enough for you to move Platoshkin, but what, are the courts in Europe ideal and not biased? Yes, they will always make decisions against Russia and the authorities

[New Year day]

Quote: paul3390

Liberast - can only be useful as a scarecrow in the exposition of the Museum of the World Socialist Revolution ..

reason dangerous! May attract!

[Cut Samshitov]

Quote: Victor_B

Quote: Svarog

liberals are changing the constitution,

Well, what do you think, besides the liberals, there are also "useful liberals"?
Maybe among them "not all are equally nasty"?

Is it possible at least one full name of an "indecent liberal?"

[Victor_B]

Quote: Sawing Boxwood

Is it possible at least one full name of an "indecent liberal?"

Putin and Shoigu arrange?

[Cut Samshitov]

And when did they call themselves liberals?

[Victor_B]

Quote: Sawing Boxwood

And when did they call themselves liberals?

Always!
Give examples of how they can still be called or called.
Well, you can call conservatives and what will change?
But the compound word lib-rust does not fit them.

[Cut Samshitov]

On your "always!" you can also shout "never!" A link to a video or even an article. And so - a career Chekist liberal, sounds like a Jew - a reindeer herder. Theoretically possible, but practically ..

[Victor_B]

Quote: Sawing Boxwood

And so - the personnel Chekist liberal, sounds like a Jew - a reindeer herder.

So Bush Jr., the former head of the CIA has never been a liberal?
Reindeer breeder?

[Cut Samshitov]

Quote: Victor_B

Quote: Sawing Boxwood

And so - the personnel Chekist liberal, sounds like a Jew - a reindeer herder.

So Bush Jr., the former head of the CIA has never been a liberal?
Reindeer breeder?

Yes. The Republican Party, from the liberals is much further than the Democrats Clinton and Obama.

[pl675]

Quote: Cut Samshitov

On your "always!" you can also shout "never!" A link to a video or even an article. And so - a career Chekist liberal, sounds like a Jew - a reindeer herder. Theoretically possible, but practically ..

he (he) has everything possible and possible - practically he succeeded with a party card in his pocket, put candles in the church.
with the constitution, if he wiped his feet about it before that, what will he do now?

[New Year day]

Quote: Sawing Boxwood

And when did they call themselves liberals?

[cost]

Quote: Cut Samshitov
Is it possible at least one full name of an "indecent liberal?"

Please - Ivan Vasilievich Grozny And it's not a joke. Inet to help you. In correspondence with Queen Elizabeth I of England, he proudly called himself a highly educated and highly cultured liberal, and openly boasted of his famous Liberia

[Malyuta]

Quote: Victor_B

Well, what do you think, besides the liberals, there are also “useful liberals?” Maybe among them “not all are equally rotten”?

Of course everything and the most important liberal as well.

[Campanella]

All the convolutions have already braided the people of this mountain of liberals, pederasts and other helmsmen. There are no normal People anymore, there are cogs of verbiage theories behind which the Pharisees and power-hungry people hide.

[SSR]

Quote: Svarog

Quote: Theodore

Oh, let the liberals howl!

Why should they howl, the liberals are changing the Constitution, but the people are howling ..

I'm reading and don’t understand.
1. No one has yet seen an option to vote.
2. If even the Yes / No option, then who said that the majority cannot say No?
3. Edro sagged strongly after the retirement and it is worth seeing what other party members will express on this initiative.
4. If all factions support, then why blame the GDP if all power is that?))).
5. Now you just need to carefully monitor what is happening and then make a decision.
PS.
And so, on what date you don’t poke, all one can be dug up something, even though the same is the last day of Pompeii.

[Malyuta]

Quote from S.S.R.

I'm reading and don’t understand.

Novel You are not the only one, everything is done just so that no one understands anything.

[Victor N]

You can clean the "understanding". Although this will not help many: they have not grown to such matters.

[Arlen]

They always howl. Don’t feed them bread, just let them grow.

[Victor_B]

Quote: Arlen

They always howl. Don’t feed them bread, just let them grow.

That's it!
On ANY initiative of the authorities.
The power did something - bad!
I didn’t - it’s all the same bad!
I asked them - it’s bad again, because they don’t know what they are doing!
Americans should probably be asked to console our liberals.

[Svarog]

Quote: Victor_B

On ANY initiative of the authorities.
The power did something - bad!

The government did something .. but what exactly did she do? She is our beloved to work for myself .. I would work for the people, the population would grow .. and so for the fourth year in a row ..

I asked them - it’s bad again, because they don’t know what they are doing!

I forgot to ask about pension reform .. as well as about an increase in the rule of the president and the Duma ..

Americans should probably be asked to console our liberals.

I think they are advised .. your liberals ..

[Victor_B]

Quote: Svarog

your liberals ..

Such liberals, however, are YOURS!
I am generally for socialism. Without oligarchs and other abominations.

[Svarog]

Quote: Victor_B

I am generally for socialism.

Well, I’m FOR socialism too, but according to your comments it’s hard to understand .. what are you upholding the socialist idea ..

[Victor_B]

It is just that socialism in Russia at this historical stage is impossible.
And then in terms of liberal - liberalist we begin to look at personalities.
Liberasty:
- all grant-eaters (political, I have nothing against grants for science);
- Well, still a fagot and .. growth are different concepts. The second on the road, for example, all the time;
- and, to simplify the understanding, ALL of us, the so-called non-systemic opposition, who eat from the hands of Khodorkovsky and praise him;
- simply hidden and overt internal enemies of Russia. Like Chubais, Gozman, etc.
Liberals are more complicated here, because there is a thick layer today for your tomorrow for ours.
Well, more patriots and "patriots". Also very different.
And Putin is a statesman acting within the framework of liberalism.
Not perfect. Especially in domestic politics.

[Svarog]

I agree with everything except:

Socialism in Russia is simply impossible in this historical period

Very possible ... nothing is impossible .. 17-year-old Nikolai also seemed impossible ..

And Putin is a statesman acting within the framework of liberalism.

Putin is a liberal, which he has repeatedly stated .. Liberal Russia can’t be .. it is doomed .. Which, in fact, is proved by the figures and results of the liberals’ activity .. Of Putin’s major achievements, I can only single out Crimea ... I’ve tried everything else . And he has been in power for 20 years, and now, apparently, he has set his sights on life .. This fact doesn’t cause anything but sorrow, everything says that the population of Russia will decrease, science, industry, education, medicine and other vital spheres of life - degrade. Today's team has shown its complete failure for 20 years is a very long time ...

[Victor_B]

Quote: Svarog

Of the serious achievements of Putin, I can only single out Crimea.

Well, and a tiny detail - Russia in 2000 and Russia in 2020, apparently, "in spite of Putin" and thanks to the "will of the people", fat is a completely different country.
Stalin took over the country with a plow and surrendered with nuclear missiles.
Putin accepted just took a piece of the Soviet Union with a completely collapsed economy and separatism, and now it is another country. Quite another.
I understand that the time of Medvedev’s rule is prettier for you?
It seems to me that if Putin hadn’t been Prime Minister under him, Medved would pile / pile / collapse / surrender even more!

[Svarog]

Russia in 2000 and Russia in 2020, apparently "in spite of Putin" and thanks to the "will of the people", fat is a completely different country.

Well, what is it different? The facade - yes, they renewed .. and the foundation is still the same ... Courts, as there were "none", so everything remained .. as all and sundry were stealing, and they are stealing .. nepotism corruption is unprecedented scale .. (though now it is safe they steal those who are in the cooperative ..) medicine, bought equipment, again, they warmed up their hands on this ... but to the point, you won't get to a narrow specialist .. yes, nothing fundamentally has changed in everything .. The price of oil was sky-high, so it seemed that life is getting better .. and riali .. demography clearly speaks about them ..

I understand that the time of Medvedev’s rule is prettier for you?
It seems to me that if Putin hadn’t been Prime Minister under him, Medved would pile / pile / collapse / surrender even more!

Rather you don't understand Medvedev and Putin, one team ..

[Victor_B]

Quote: Svarog

Rather, you do not understand Medvedev and Putin, one team ..

The team is one, and the commander has changed.
Apparently, you didn’t have to work in production when you changed the director and returned from the post of deputy.
I have seen. And the difference is VERY big!

[Andrey VOV]

Are you swollen from hunger? Putin comes to you daily and takes the last one? Good whining, a peasant is not worth it

[Eugene-Eugene]

you're already at war, child of a coronavirus.

[New Year day]

Quote: Theodore

Oh, let the liberals howl!

That's for sure! Peskov confirms

[Mavrikiy]

On the day of the 150th anniversary of the birth of Lenin: Putin approved the date of the referendum on the Constitution

We approve Putin’s approval, and what remains. On the other hand, symbolic.

[Cut Samshitov]

Only one paragraph on the abolition of priority of international (read - Washington) legislation is enough to participate in a referendum.

[New Year day]

Quote: Sawing Boxwood

to participate in the referendum.

in the survey! Pension reform referendum where?

[Andrey VOV]

Are you a pensioner? No, there are hands on the legs? There is, so why are you whining then? Not a man, but a whiner

[New Year day]

Quote: Andrey VOV

Are you a senior citizen? No

Yes. In the operating room since 1980. Impossible to live on pension, I work

Quote: Andrey VOV

no, are there legs arms?

have hypertension III. Few? 2 coming to the cardiopulmonary resuscitation from the operating room is also not enough?

Quote: Andrey VOV

not a man, but a whiner

not for you to judge.

[Genry]

Quote: Silvestr

Pension reform referendum where?

Collect signatures and you will have a referendum.
Under the amendment of the Constitution, he collected the signatures of NOD.

[Eugene-Eugene]

approve yourself, no one has delegated you, especially from the Supreme Council.

[Tank jacket]

An interesting numerical measure of the event 22, 2020 ... 22; 22.
Strong managerial maneuver.

[New Year day]

Quote: Tank jacket

Strong managerial maneuver.

maybe a mystery of numbers? or believe in otherworldly forces?

[Malyuta]

Quote: Silvestr

maybe a mystery of numbers? or believe in otherworldly forces?

Is the entrance to Shambhala?

[DMB 75]

that there will be no specification of amendments to the ballot in the referendum. The question will sound something like this: "Do you support changes to the Constitution of Russia?"

Variants of answer:
1. Yes, not against change
2. No, not against the changes.
Of course, people are not opposed to revising the results of the Great Patriotic War or indexing pensions. And what else will be on this list? You can fix anything under the Constitution. Return Stalin's socially oriented, or 77 years.

[Alexga]

Once again "yes, yes, no, yes"!

[DymOk_v_dYmke]

Quote: AlexGa

Once again "yes, yes, no, yes"!

And the rapid destruction of ballots.

[Malyuta]

Quote: AlexGa

Once again "yes, yes, no, yes"!

I voted NO, NO, YES, NO!

[bk316]

And what else will be in this list complete?

And you read and write an article. We are pleased to discuss ....

[Campanella]

Yes, the president was covered for the New Year and it started! "Come on, herself, herself ...." (Station, for two)
Actually, the president stirs up, mixes and shakes.
The working group, in my opinion, decided to mock, at least something worthwhile to contribute, as they say, if you can’t avoid violence, you need to relax.
Be that as it may, everything will return as a boomerang if the authorities solve their problems.

[SARANCHA1976]

More on Thursdays to wear panties on his head

[faterdom]

For the Emperor Constantine and his wife - the Constitution!

[Eugene-Eugene]

then did not pass ...

[Thrifty]

You can pass a million new laws, and amendments to the constitution of the country, but when will the power itself learn to begin to implement its own laws that were adopted earlier? ??

[Nikolay87]

Quote: Thrifty

You can pass a million new laws and amendments to the constitution of the country, but when will the power itself learn to begin to implement its own laws that were adopted earlier? ??

You see what’s the matter, in our country officials themselves will not do anything, they need to be forced to do their job. And the only way to do it officially is to oblige it legally.
About pensions, I would also add "prohibit the freezing of pensions" and "annual indexation not lower than inflation"But somehow it was all lowered and these officials will get out again.

[New Year day]

Quote: Nikolay87

And the only way to do it officially is to oblige it legally

and now officials are not working in the legal field of the Russian Federation?

[Nikolay87]

Quote: Silvestr

Quote: Nikolay87

And the only way to do it officially is to oblige it legally

and now officials are not working in the legal field of the Russian Federation?

I mean, if this is not spelled out in their duties, in one way or another, then they will not lift a finger.

[Campanella]

Officials work in their field, they are afraid only of the president and his inner circle, and they do not care about the people.
A people of the type elected a president, and he rules in the interests of the people and rules ... It is ridiculous indeed.

[Campanella]

Bullshit, tomorrow Putin will come out and say that the situation does not allow him to pay a minimum wage, there is no gold reserve! And all swim geese by.

[lelik613]

A sapper is a self-taught ... "- What is the difference between an installation and a performance? If, for example, you gave a shit to a person at the door, and then rang the bell, this is an installation. But if you first called the person, and when he left the apartment, then you sat down in front of him and gave a shit, - this is already a performance. "

[fa2998]

Quote: DMB 75

indexation of pensions.

Well, about pensions there is a separate law, there is no need to overload the Constitution. Yes and little this amendment will give pensioners, after all, the authorities consider inflation, such and indexation. Although the prices are sky high!
And yet, probably in the world we will be the only country where the guaranteed earnings are reflected in the Constitution, pr.150-160 $, Hurray !!! Only employers will get out, because now many pay 5-6 thousand.

[carstorm 11]

No one pays 5-6 thousand. Why write these nonsense? The Labor Code of the Russian Federation clearly defines that a salary less than the living wage is not allowed. Reduced wages are a problem not only for the employee, but also for the employer, because according to Article 133 of the Labor Code, the salary cannot be lower than the officially fixed value of the living wage. I have never met anyone who is not so friendly with his head that this would violate.

[polar fox]

Quote: carstorm 11

No one pays 5-6 thousand. Why write these nonsense?

the niece works at the post office 7,5 tyrov.

[Servisinzhener]

Full time?

[polar fox]

Quote: Servisinzhener

Full time?

Yes.

[Andrey VOV]

Write a complaint to the labor inspectorate and prosecutor's office

[Nikolai Grek]

Quote: Andrey VOV

Write a complaint to the labor inspectorate and prosecutor's office

what for?? it's better to grind here !!

[carstorm 11]

people are also robbed on the street. necessarily a complaint. it’s their local superiors twisting something. and most likely refer to the minimum wage. if he says nothing, it’s very vain.

[Malyuta]

Quote: carstorm 11

I have never met anyone who is not so friendly with his head that this would violate.

small Worker work part-time.

[carstorm 11]

this is generally another article with real terms. people are forced to work full time for half the rate.

[SARANCHA1976]

Yes, for such a living wage it is already necessary to plant at this minimum

[Lord of the Sith]

To vote like that, you need to know what specific amendments have been made, otherwise there is little less sense in voting than no.

[DymOk_v_dYmke]

Quote: Lord of the Sith

To vote like that, you need to know what specific amendments have been made, otherwise there is little less sense in voting than no.

To know a little. There should be a referendum on each amendment separately.

[flicker]

On the day of the 150th anniversary of the birth of Lenin: Putin approved the date of the referendum on the Constitution

Finally, these amendments have long been obvious.
In the current constitution: "The norm of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, establishing priority of international law over national law ..."
Amendments propose to consolidate in Russia priority of Russian laws over international
Against the amendments, only rabid Russophobia.
Z.Y. And the date was chosen successfully!

[Paranoid50]

Quote: flicker

The amendments propose to fix in Russian territory the priority of Russian laws over international

There are enough useful items. At least the one that Mashkov introduced is a ban even on any negotiations regarding the territorial integrity of Russia. That is, nobody has any territories - whatever would be in their thoughts. And here's a funny moment: as in the past two years the local swamp has been rushing about, all this petty bourgeois organized crime group, howling about everything, give the islands-islands to damned yap ... And what we see now: the very same organisms we build are going into failure. Aw, that's the fawn. And this is only one point. In short, as one character used to say: our people are wonderful,
only people, here ... yeah.

[Overlock]

Quote: Paranoid50

Aw, that's the fawn.

Are you talking about the Daman and Norwegian Sea?

Quote: Paranoid50

the ban even to conduct any negotiations regarding the territorial integrity of Russia.

who did all this?

[Paranoid50]

Quote: Overlock

Daman and Norwegian Sea?

Not tired of procrastinating this bullshit? But, after all, everything is in the public domain, all the details have been chewed for a long time, but no, not in the horses of oats. This uncle to this day is cursed by one proud northern country:

Quote: Overlock

who did all this?

And then I’ll answer: you don’t even need to leave the resource to find out, yeah: the local host, to which the voices were whispered (again) about some mythical "deals". For almost two years, a form of hysteria took place here from scratch, fueled by unknown local "authors" (well, where are they without "flock"?), Who, I'm sure, themselves quietly sneered at all this action. The result - zilch, everything went into steam. And during this time, the notorious islands were pumped up to the fool with various types of weapons and deployed units of the RF Armed Forces. And everything is hand over and over ... Hey-bo, this was the last time something was explained to someone. That's it, Sabbath, let them chew their snot further.

[flicker]

There are enough useful items. At least the one that Mashkov introduced is a ban even on any negotiations regarding the territorial integrity of Russia.

That's right, enough. And territorial integrity - yes, it also knocks out a topic for speculation from the "supposedly" patriotic part.

And what we see now: the very same organisms we build are going into failure.

exactly what "organisms"

[Malyuta]

Quote: flicker

Against the amendments, only rabid Russophobia.

First you need to change the judicial system, and no ECHR will help you anymore and you will be able to safely forget International Human Rights!
General Assembly,

proclaims this Universal Declaration of Human Rights as a task that all peoples and states should strive to achieve, so that every person and every organ of society, constantly bearing in mind the present Declaration, seeks, through education and education, to promote respect for these rights and freedoms and to ensure , through national and international progressive measures, universal and effective recognition and implementation of them both among the peoples of the Member States of the Organization, and among the peoples of the territories, find those under their jurisdiction.

Article 1

All people are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and must act towards each other in a spirit of brotherhood.

Article 2

Everyone should have all the rights and freedoms proclaimed by this Declaration, without any distinction, somehow in relation to race, color, sex, language, religion, political or other beliefs, national or social origin, property, estate or other position.

In addition, no distinction should be made on the basis of the political, legal or international status of the country or territory to which the person belongs, regardless of whether the territory is independent, trust, non-self-governing or otherwise limited in its sovereignty.

Article 3

Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.

Article 4

No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade are prohibited in all their forms.

Article 5

No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

Article 6

Every person, no matter where he is, has the right to recognition of his legal personality.

Article 7

All people are equal before the law and are entitled, without distinction, to equal protection of the law. All people have the right to equal protection against any discrimination that violates this Declaration, and against any incitement to such discrimination.

Article 8

Everyone has the right to effective restoration of rights by the competent national courts in cases of violation of his fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law.

Article 9

No one may be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile.

Article 10

Every person, in order to determine his rights and obligations and to establish the validity of the criminal charge against him, has the right, on the basis of full equality, to have his case considered publicly and in compliance with all requirements of justice by an independent and impartial court.

Article 11

1. Every person accused of committing a crime has the right to be presumed innocent until his guilt is established by law through a public trial, in which he is provided with all the possibilities for defense.

2. No one may be convicted of a crime on the basis of the commission of an act or inaction, which at the time of their commission did not constitute a crime under national laws or international law. Nor can a heavier punishment be imposed than the one that could have been applied at the time when the crime was committed.

Article 12

No one may be subjected to arbitrary interference with his personal and family life, arbitrary attacks on the inviolability of his home, the secrecy of his correspondence or his honor and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or such encroachment.

Article 13

1. Everyone has the right to move freely and choose his place of residence within each state.

2. Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country.

Article 14

1. Everyone has the right to seek asylum from persecution in other countries and to use this shelter.

2. This right cannot be exercised in the case of persecution, in fact based on the commission of a non-political crime, or an act contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.

Article 15

1. Everyone has the right to citizenship.

2. No one may be arbitrarily deprived of his citizenship or the right to change his citizenship.

Article 16

1. Men and women of full age have the right, without any restrictions on the basis of race, nationality or religion, to marry and found their own family. They enjoy the same rights with respect to marriage, during a state of marriage and during its dissolution.

2. A marriage may be concluded only with the free and full consent of both parties to the marriage.

3. The family is the natural and fundamental unit of society and has the right to protection from society and the state.

[Malyuta]

Article 17

1. Everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association with others.

2. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property.

Article 18

Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change one’s religion or belief and freedom to practice one’s religion or belief, individually or in community with others, publicly or privately, in the teaching, worship, and performance of religious and ritualistic rites.

Article 19

Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to adhere freely to one's beliefs and freedom to seek, receive and disseminate information and ideas by any means and regardless of state borders.

Article 20

1. Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association.

2. No one may be forced to join any association.

Article 21

1. Everyone has the right to take part in the government of his country, directly or through freely chosen representatives.

2. Everyone has the right to equal access to public service in his country.

3. The will of the people should be the basis of government power; this will must find expression in periodic and un rigged elections, which must be held with universal and equal suffrage by secret ballot or other equivalent forms that ensure freedom of vote.

Article 22

Each person, as a member of society, has the right to social security and to exercise the rights necessary in order to maintain his dignity and for the free development of his personality in the economic, social and cultural fields through national efforts and international cooperation and in accordance with the structure and resources of each state .

Article 23

1. Everyone has the right to work, to free choice of work, to fair and favorable working conditions, and to protection against unemployment.

2. Everyone, without any discrimination, has the right to equal pay for equal work.

3. Every worker has the right to a fair and satisfactory remuneration, ensuring a decent living for himself and his family, and supplemented, if necessary, by other means of social security.

4. Everyone has the right to create trade unions and join trade unions to protect their interests.

Article 24

Everyone has the right to rest and leisure, including the right to a reasonable restriction on working hours and to paid periodic leave.

Article 25

1. Everyone has the right to such a standard of living, including food, clothing, housing, medical care and the necessary social services that are necessary to maintain the health and well-being of himself and his family, and the right to provision in case of unemployment, illness, disability, widowhood, the onset of old age or another case of loss of livelihood due to circumstances beyond its control.

2. Motherhood and infancy give the right to special care and assistance. All children born in or out of wedlock should enjoy the same social protection.

Article 26

1. Everyone has the right to education. Education should be free, at least with regard to primary and general education. Primary education must be compulsory. Technical and vocational education should be universally accessible, and higher education should be equally accessible to all based on the abilities of each.

2. Education should be aimed at the full development of the human personality and at increasing respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. Education should promote mutual understanding, tolerance and friendship among all peoples, racial and religious groups, and should contribute to United Nations peacekeeping.

3. Parents have a priority right in choosing the type of education for their young children.

Article 27

1. Everyone has the right to freely participate in the cultural life of society, enjoy art, participate in scientific progress and enjoy its benefits.

2. Everyone has the right to protect his moral and material interests arising from scientific, literary or artistic works of which he is the author.

Article 28

Everyone has the right to a social and international order in which the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration can be fully realized.

Article 29

1. Everyone has duties to a society in which the free and full development of his personality is possible.

2. In the exercise of their rights and freedoms, each person shall be subject only to such restrictions as are established by law solely to ensure due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others and to satisfy the fair requirements of morality, public order and general welfare in a democratic society.

3. The exercise of these rights and freedoms shall in no case be contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.

Article 30

Nothing in this Declaration shall be construed as granting to any state, group of persons or individuals the right to engage in any activity or perform actions aimed at the destruction of the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration.

[flicker]

You would still have the whole site: "https://studopedia.ru/10_226459_generalnaya-assambleya.html
copied.
Can you express your own thought?

[Malyuta]

Quote: flicker

Can you express your own thought?

My native language is Russian, I have outlined everything, but if you don’t know how to read or see poorly, this is your sadness.

[flicker]

Your thought.
And not a declaration of the text of the General Assembly on human rights and freedoms.
I do not think that you are its author.

[brat07]

And now, please:
Article 12:

No one may be arbitrarily interfered with in his personal and family

life, arbitrary attacks on the inviolability of his home, the secrecy of his correspondence, or on his honor and reputation. Everyone has the right to be protected by the law from such interference or such encroachment. "
Didn’t remind you ???
Let me remind you - juvenile justice, which is "flourishing" in double color in many European countries.
And how does it "fit" with this article?

[kot28.ru]

And how many articles are violated by the states, interfering in the internal affairs of other states, often with the use of armed formations? They spit on all this, why then what does not work should be higher than the Russian legislation? Or are the opponents of the amendment more frightened by others? dual citizenship, a ban on the rejection of territories, a bummer on a variety of claims-squeaks towards Russia?

[petrol cutter]

Interesting thought! I just returned from work.
I have two questions.
So the date was set, or did the parties exchange opinions?
Where can I find the final list of changes so to speak?
Once the vote is a list.

[Eugene-Eugene]

everything will be fine!

[petrol cutter]

And suddenly, will not be? And I, at that time, went out to smoke ...
That time, it came out, the Soviet Union collapsed. I personally have no right to make a mistake ...
I have to be sober to put an end to the newsletter!

[Sergey Averchenkov]

I am for Lenin, I don’t know who is there for whom, but I am for Lenin. There are even no questions.

[Andrey VOV]

Mummy fan?

[Sergey Averchenkov]

A fan of the USSR, then Lenin. What can I do, I was raised, grew up in the USSR. I understand you are against, well, shoot everyone like me.

[Andrey VOV]

I, too, was born in the USSR, but the way Lenin conceived the USSR, it came to us, Stalin, by the way, was against just such a union state, and in general, what still serves us was done under Stalin, and Lenin didn’t moreover, given that since the age of 20, he was physically unable to fully lead

[Sergey Averchenkov]

I agree that from the 20th. But you understand, without Lenin there would have been no Stalin. It would not be, it would not be stupid. And so on down to us, what a bad habit to shit on your past?

[Andrey VOV]

it can be an infinitely long story from a series that there used to be a chicken or an egg, I remain of my opinion, you are of your own

[Sergey Averchenkov]

On this and go. Sincerely.

[Radical]

Quote: figvam

Quote: Askold Matveev

I will go. I’ll go in principle and vote against the adoption of the amendments.

In your opinion, let officials remain dual citizenship, and the laws of NATO countries will be higher than ours? And the constitution is unchanged - Yeltsin, pah.

And do you know that the amendment proposed by actor Mashkov to ban the alienation of part of the territory of the Russian Federation in favor of any states will not be included in the list of changes, and what ridiculous reason did the Guarantor give in order not to include it?

[Svarog]

Quote: Radikal

And do you know that the amendment proposed by actor Mashkov to ban the alienation of part of the territory of the Russian Federation in favor of any states will not be included in the list of changes, and what ridiculous reason did the Guarantor give in order not to include it?

No, it is very curious why the guarantor rejected such an important amendment?

[depressant]

Stunned! Really really not included?!? And why then vote there.

[Andrey VOV]

It's stuffing, it's gonna be made, don't spread the lie

[brat07]

Quote: Radikal

Quote: figvam

Quote: Askold Matveev

I will go. I’ll go in principle and vote against the adoption of the amendments.

In your opinion, let officials remain dual citizenship, and the laws of NATO countries will be higher than ours? And the constitution is unchanged - Yeltsin, pah.

And do you know that the amendment proposed by actor Mashkov to ban the alienation of part of the territory of the Russian Federation in favor of any states will not be included in the list of changes, and what ridiculous reason did the Guarantor give in order not to include it?

I apologize, but the link will be about the rejection of the amendment of the actor Mashkov on the prohibition of exclusion will be ???
For some reason I did not find.
And this is already "annoying".

[Lord of the Sith]

Something you carry a blizzard, Sylvester in the Dining Room.

[New Year day]

Quote: Lord of the Sith

Something you are carrying a blizzard

you do not keep up with the likes of you!

[Lord of the Sith]

You like? Who is this? In more detail, please, I'm curious what a person will say (or maybe a bot, or a troll half-time), who am I, not knowing anything about me))

[Lord of the Sith]

What, zero attention, a pound of contempt?))
I actually asked a question.
Do not burst only from a sense of self-importance))

[Loess]

Quote: Silvestr

and it’s April 22 that appoints a vote for itself! Indescribable hypocrisy!

What you, however, write nonsense. But the most interesting thing is that you yourself understand this, but

Quote: Silvestr

Indescribable hypocrisy!

[Andrey VOV]

Everything was worked out on the shelves why exactly the 22nd date, if your mental abilities do not allow this to be understood, then I sincerely regret you

[carstorm 11]

when you already understand that April 22 is for 80 percent of the country's inhabitants just April 22 ...

[Professor Preobrazhensky]

For those who are happy that an article will appear on the impossibility of tearing off the territories of the Russian Federation, I want to ask:
- Have you read the current constitution?
- Isn't there an article on territorial integrity?
- If you don’t see such an article there, then on the basis of what did we restore constitutional order to the first Chechen company?
- Did this clause of the constitution prevent each of the mz presidents acting at that time (Medvedev and Putin) from giving away our territories?
- And on the basis of what then harsh sentences are handed down for attempts to change the integrity of the state?
The Internet will help you both about the constitution and about the article on the integrity of the state and about the first Chechen and about the given land.

[Overlock]

Quote: Professor Preobrazhensky

Have you read the current constitution?
- Isn't there an article on territorial integrity?
- If you don’t see such an article there, then on the basis of what did we restore constitutional order to the first Chechen company?
- Did this clause of the constitution prevent each of the mz presidents acting at that time (Medvedev and Putin) from giving away our territories?
- And on the basis of what then harsh sentences are handed down for attempts to change the integrity of the state?

the question is deaf: they are always "for" and it does not matter for what reason. The main thing is to please the authorities

[GUSAR]

And what kind of referendum are you talking about? After all, they said that it would not be a referendum, but a poll, yesterday they wrote that it would even be possible to vote on "State Services" ... Oh, how ... But in general, I remember once, relatively long ago and recently at the same time, there was something it looks like 1993, "Yes, yes, no, yes," remember? But there was a referendum. And by the way, what will the vote be about?

[petrol cutter]

For approval of amendments to the constitution of the Russian Federation. As far as I understand. Vote must be assumed by the list.
Where is it not clear to you?

[GUSAR]

It is not clear what specific amendments you can announce the list?

[spirit]

Yeah, you see, the Great Supreme Ruler loves very much that everything would be legitimate and official, so we will vote to approve what I have already approved)) but in general it reminds me of something

[vladimirvn]

Voting in a single package for changing the Constitution is a mockery and a spit in the face. So do not respect your people! I have no words!

[fa2998]

Quote: carstorm 11

No one pays 5-6 thousand. Why write these nonsense? The Labor Code of the Russian Federation clearly defines that a salary less than the living wage is not allowed. Reduced wages are a problem not only for the employee, but also for the employer, because according to Article 133 of the Labor Code, the salary cannot be lower than the officially fixed value of the living wage. I have never met anyone who is not so friendly with his head that this would violate.

Where do you live? In Moscow? In the outback, and even if it’s a day \ 2-3. The guard receives 5-7 thousand. A spouse says the hospital recently had a salary of a nurse-4600. At the janitor, the cleaners in the housing office, 5-7 thousand are a constant fluid. City beggar, subsidized. Come, do not be a dreamer.

[carstorm 11]

Firstly, I'm talking about the salary of a normal 8 hour day. she always goes the benchmark. the watchman and stuff is from another opera. secondly, if someone does not follow the laws for their own benefit, this is a crime. and these organizations need to write statements and complaints. What does the region have to do with it? TK is one for all.

[parusnik]

Earlier, the working group reported that there would be no specification of amendments to the ballot in the referendum. The question will sound something like this: "Do you support changes to the Constitution of Russia?"

...Those. April 23, we can wake up under the constitutional monarchy ...

[Overlock]

Quote: parusnik

Those. April 23, we can wake up under the constitutional monarchy ...

have any doubts? Churov! Aw!

[Professor Preobrazhensky]

For those who advocate the primacy of our legislation over international:
- We both adhered to international law and will live in accordance with international laws. Otherwise, we will become an outcast country. Well, you can not live with neighboring countries based on their laws. It’s like in a strange monastery ....
- Let's say our Petrov and Bashirov were convicted in absentia in London. We didn’t give them and we won’t give them back.
- Or does someone think that with the adoption of this amendment we will return the convict Bout, who was convicted by the states? We will return our other convicts around the world?
- Or will we ignore the decision of the European court in the Yukos case? Then they will arrest our property, as they once arrested Kruzinshtern, an art exhibition, an airliner.
- Or will our Gazprom not now pay penalties to Ukraine by decision of an international court? Then Ukraine will block our pipe for transit, as a warning.
- But when the European Court of Human Rights admits that you were illegally convicted in Russia for allegedly participating in a rally and decides to pay you 10.000 euros in compensation for each year of the colony, then this amendment will work. They solder another term at home, for violating the constitution and being shot as a repeat offender (the last joke, although who knows).

[tank64rus]

An outcast country from whom apparently from the liberals then I will vote three times. Since we ceased to be an outcast country, we have lost the entire economy, millions of people, millions of kilometers of territory, armed forces. The country is ruled by a comprador bourgeoisie in alliance with crime. So it’s better to live a country without this and I don’t care how good uncles from the wild West treat us, though for you this is the luminous city of Washington on a hill.

[Warrior MorePhoto]

Quote: Lord of the Sith

To vote like that, you need to know what specific amendments have been made, otherwise there is little less sense in voting than no.

All amendments are dust in the eyes, everything is already defined and clear. What prevents a kick in the ass with dual citizenship? This is generally how ??? Take an oath of allegiance to another country ... often these are NATO countries or even our potential enemies - America, England. Stalin would have really hung all of them publicly on Red Square for the treason of the purest water!
Pensions increase ... so they will increase by 100 rubles, and the ruble will collapse by 10 rubles, that’s all the math, and maybe increase by 10 rubles.
All questions go to all segments of the population, for example, grandmothers For retirement, opponents of rear-wheel drive and family For mom and dad, not parent1 and 2, for those who are tired of snickering EdRo, For against dual citizenship, etc., and + to 1. Increase rating 2 The most important thing is to consolidate the state council, which will decide everything with our permanent decisions. Any decision in the future, even the president, can be rejected by the State Council, as well as the approval of the president himself will be confirmed by them, i.e. he who needs them will be.

[samarin1969]

Why change the Constitution? There is one problem with it - it is not observed. Not respected, ranging from "honor and dignity" in public transport. Well, Chapters 1 and 2 are observed quite formally by "sovereign people".

ps In the XNUMXth century, one "enlightened ruler" gathered the "Legislated Commission" - it ended in war and revolt. ... Only Crimea has already been attached "in advance."

[Chess knight]

Quote: Petrol cutter

Interesting thought! I just returned from work.
I have two questions.
So the date was set, or did the parties exchange opinions?
Where can I find the final list of changes so to speak?
Once the vote is a list.

"What kind of socks do you want to wear, red or blue?" It is so convenient with children, because they wonder which ones, but in fact they do not understand what they will have to wear them. So here, it seems like everything is correct, only not a word about the State Council, everyone is puzzled, whether to write God into the Constitution or not, about pensions, well, which of the pensioners does not want to be raised? So vote FOR, but in fact, a body is being created more important than the president, where it will be clear who will be !?

[Whisper]

And the full list of changes will probably be announced on April 21st?

[Campanella]

The working group unanimously states that 97% of the people supported the constitutional amendment. Apparently I got to 3%, no one asked me.
The people are the bearers of power, and the basic law is ruled by a group of people, and the people only have to approve their choice. Somehow this is not constitutional. The role of the people in the development and adoption of the constitution should be more significant and procedurally spelled out.

[29dest]

I'm going to go and vote against the constitutional coup. And now the uryakryakals and pensioners have slipped another handout in the form of a ban on citizenship and the priority of local law over international law against the background of the creation of a body for the eternal rule of Elbasy, and they will happily run to vote not on points but for the adoption of the entire criminal package of amendments. Without even thinking that the powers of the "State Council" and the method of its formation have not yet been determined by federal law. Without thinking, how many notorious personalities with a residence permit and permanent residence are in the committee on changing the constitution ...

[Chess knight]

Quote: 29dest

I'm going to go and vote against the constitutional coup. And now the uryakryakals and pensioners have slipped another handout in the form of a ban on citizenship and the priority of local law over international law against the background of the creation of a body for the eternal rule of Elbasy, and they will happily run to vote not on points but for the adoption of the entire criminal package of amendments. Without even thinking that the powers of the "State Council" and the method of its formation have not yet been determined by federal law. Without thinking, how many notorious personalities with a residence permit and permanent residence are in the committee on changing the constitution ...

If we talk about the priority of local over international, then why is our Crimea?) Then it is not ours) the Ukrainian constitution has a clause which states that no territories can be transferred or separated, international society is against ... but Crimea is ours!)

[Karabin]

Earlier, the working group reported that there would be no specification of amendments to the ballot in the referendum. The question will sound something like this: “Do you support changes to the Constitution of Russia?” There are two possible answers: yes and no.

Those in power have started playing with the basic law with one single purpose - to retain power for life. The supreme body of power will be the State Council, headed by Putin for life. Dear Russians will not even have to bother going to the "elections"; the "best people of the country" will form the supreme body of power without the participation of the electorate. All other amendments are patriotic chaff, on which once again offshore Putin and Co. will lead gullible citizens. You, who hang labels of liberals and Russophobes on those who say "no" to amendments, do you really think that the consolidated priority of Russian legislation over international ones will somehow change the situation? Or will the prescribed ban on dual citizenship shake the ranks of high-ranking officials and deputies? I am begging you. Under the current constitution, no international law is higher than the Russian one, until consent is signed to enforce it. Signed by the way by the authorities and the president as well. Don't like paying the bills of the Hague court? So tear up the relevant international treaty and don't pay. What to do with international obligations under the new amendment? Either to refuse obligations, or to adjust the already internal law to the obligations. Knowing about the great love of Putin and Co. for dear friends and partners, the desire to be with them at the same table, to be in the same organizations with them, I will not be at all surprised at the redrawing of the necessary laws for these tasks. So why change the awl for soap, and even with a surcharge? The same is with dual-triple citizenship. A barrier for such people can be easily installed within the framework of current legislation. There would be desire and will. But no. We need a circus with a nationwide expression of will. Why circus? Yes, because all high-profile citizens will remain in their places, because they are pure lambs and have no green cards or residence permits. They swear by mom.
So, dear so-called patriots, at least worry about the amendments, there’s only one result - they’ll fuck you again.
PS By the way, for the adherents of "The king is good - the boyars are rubbish" a new stage begins. After the adoption of amendments to the constitution in bulk (of which I am 146% sure) and the formation of the state council, the president can be added to the bad boyars over time.

[remal]

Don't like paying the bills of the Hague court? So break the relevant international treaty and don’t pay. What to do with international obligations under the new amendment? Either refuse obligations, or customize an internal law to obligations. Knowing the great love of Putin and Co. for dear friends and partners, the desire to be at the same table with them, to be in the same organizations with them, I will not be surprised at all at redrawing the necessary laws for these tasks. So why change the awl for soap, and even with a surcharge?

Play something. There, all the cheese is boron because of the 50 billion euros that the privatizers sued from in court against Russia. Well, they took it to the referendum - "Pay?" and options "yes", "no", "don’t know". And then let the lawyers in our country and abroad think about how to formalize all this, leave the OSCE, or cancel the results of privatization, this is already a matter of technology. I am in favor not to pay on this occasion, and not because of money, but out of principle, but at the same time, I want the European Court for Citizens to continue working as far as possible. And for the union agreement with Belarus to work, regardless of the opinion of the constitutional court.

As for the extension of powers. Well, it’s such a vote in most countries of Africa, it happens in the BSSSR, it used to be in Latin America, now it seems that they are already moving away from that. In principle, I’m on the drum, how will the vote go there.

An important question about boundaries,

Vladimir Putin specified that it is necessary to find formulations that "would not prevent the Foreign Ministry from working on demarcation of borders in the future."

I’m not lazy, I’m going to vote against such formulations.

[Professor Preobrazhensky]

In order to vote for constitutional amendments, it is not necessary to visit a polling station or vote through a public services portal.
It will be enough on April 22 to turn on the TV on any federal channel and just blink.
That’s about 146% of votes will be counted for changing the constitution.

[Radical]

Quote: Svarog

Quote: Radikal

And do you know that the amendment proposed by actor Mashkov to ban the alienation of part of the territory of the Russian Federation in favor of any states will not be included in the list of changes, and what ridiculous reason did the Guarantor give in order not to include it?

No, it is very curious why the guarantor rejected such an important amendment?

And the reason, or rather, the reason he cited is funny - supposedly this amendment will make it difficult to resolve issues related to the demarcation of border sections, but he didn’t say which ones. It is strange that since 1918, when the border troops were created, such problems did not arise, in addition, you can always develop a mechanism that does not hinder the amendment on the ban on alienation of the territory - any border guard officer knows that!

[DPN]

That's right, until the guarantor is responsible for the territory with his head, all this will be from the evil one.
The main goal is not JURISDICTION for any act. Example: Gorbachev, Yeltsin that they received for the collapse? Government service and a monument.

[Professor Preobrazhensky]

ARE YOU NOT AGAINST PACKAGE AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION?
- yeah I do not mind
- no I do not mind

[sergo1914]

Would the new Constitution not receive the adjective "Lenin"?

[Radical]

Quote: Sheptun

And the full list of changes will probably be announced on April 21st?

On the 23rd and 24th, when the results are summed up / subtotal and it is announced that 99,9 percent of the population voted "for". We will be surprised when "the entire list is announced"!

[fif21]

The guarantor wants guarantees. And in a democratic society, everyone is equal before the law. I am against changes to the Constitution. Medvedev was also the President of the Russian Federation. ! And what else they want to change in the Constitution, they do not specifically say. They propose voting in the dark for some changes.

[Vasily Kritov]

Trolling of the West and liberal-tuned at the highest level)))

[Chess knight]

Quote: fif21

The guarantor wants guarantees. And in a democratic society, everyone is equal before the law. I am against changes to the Constitution. Medvedev was also the President of the Russian Federation. ! And what else they want to change in the Constitution, they do not specifically say. They propose voting in the dark for some changes.

Moreover, even logically, if there are 2-3 changes, I should have the right to speak out Against what I am and For what.
Every person has and can have something For and Something Against.

[Fishery]

150 from the day of Lenin’s birth) this is very important now, I think like other referenda will be held almost unanimously))))))))))) that’s why the GDP will be crowned

[7,62x54]

Before the referendum, it would be necessary to hammer the Mausoleum with plywood. And there May 9 is not far.

[75 Sergey]

This Constitution was written by a drunken EBN, dictated by the US State Department.

[faterdom]

Quote: Paranoid50

There are enough useful items. At least the one that Mashkov introduced is a ban even on any negotiations regarding the territorial integrity of Russia.

And what, is it separately necessary to stipulate? Or what other eccentricities? After all, President Yeltsin also used to soak his pants in the presence of meeting foreigners ... Also include a ban in the Constitution? Ah, yes, it’s still necessary to ban the parliament from thrashing tanks, otherwise it happens with us, because it’s not forbidden = allowed!

[rruvim]

The dismissed Surkov hinted that amendments to this very Constitution will nullify the presidential term (i.e. the Foreman will be able again and again). No matter how the presidential administration refutes this. I do not know if these amendments are useful for our Russian reality? It’s not obvious to me. Therefore, obviously I’ll go to vote and express firmly - NO !!!

[DPN]

Let's go lay flowers to V.I. Lenin, and then to the referendum.

[ultra]

Quote from dsk

There will be no "gift" from me - I will not vote.

This is your gift.

[syndicalist]

Quote: loki565

Well, one amendment had to be made a long time ago, this is the supremacy of the laws of the country over external ones, as in the USA, China, etc.

Freak! There are no "external laws". There are international agreements signed by the president on behalf of the state. Don't sign unprofitable contracts and there will be no "dominance".

[rruvim]

There is a moment with which the Kremlin brothers are blackmailing us: "The supremacy of the basic law of the Russian Federation over international law." They say we will not accept the amendments "together", then we will not accept this amendment either. This means for the "shoals" of GAZPROM, the return of the Crimea, the alleged downing of a Malaysian Boeing, and even for the famine, etc. etc. will have to pay for the decisions of international courts in accordance with our Yeltsin Constitution of 1993. And if we accept "together", then we will agree to the State Council, and more, to zero the presidential terms.

[remal]

Gazprom is already paying according to court decisions. The rest is all theory. Practice now in the Yukos case is 50 billion euros. According to this precedent, it is important to give a turn from the gate to distinguish between civil affairs, economic issues and politics.

[rruvim]

Well, that would be just this point: "The supremacy of the basic law of the Russian Federation over the international one" without any other amendments. It would be possible to vote the next day with all the people and en masse ...

[remal]

To vote on this court case, one must open people's eyes to how and by whom the privatization was organized. Who got the property. How the measure of Nefteyugansk was killed in order not to pay taxes, etc., etc. And just to vote with bows for all the good, it makes no sense.

[Roman070280]

This is called - under the fool ..

[Rostislav]

Rave. How can I vote without seeing a specific text? And when a few corrections. I agree with 2, let's say, but I don’t agree with 2 others. What `s next?
Such a statement of the issue of pure water is a profanation of the very idea of ​​a referendum.

[fk7777777]

That's what it is about, no specifics, just like in ancient Egypt, yes or no, that's all ...

[Lontus]

The boycott strategy is untenable.
You need to go and vote against it.
Faking the turnout is easier than the outcome of the protest vote.
Do not forget about exit polls - only a person who went to the site can affect them, and it is harder and more impossible for rogues to control exit polls in the areas.
The man whose voice was stolen is more active and meaner than the boycott.
Voting against delivers orders of magnitude more problems to crooks than a boycott.
It is possible to control the voting process more efficiently, where there is a significant protest population who came to the polls.
In addition, the political culture of the population is increasing.

[fk7777777]

Wow, well done, well done, what amendments, what are we talking about, what is being changed, simple - yes or no. Like dudika, you need to turn it on... We’ll change everything ourselves, don’t worry.

[Alexga]

For the coming sleep, I will allow myself a little bit of humor and recommend everyone to watch the music of the new BSU TEAM - CHILDREN... I don’t remember the exact name. So it’s about the Constitution and the future. Look, it's very interesting. The main thing is that the future will be better than the present. This is the second game of the 1/8 KVN major league.

[Protos]

Quote from dsk

There will be no "gift" from me - I will not vote.

So you Ukrainians won’t vote

[Protos]

Quote: Askold Matveev

I will go. I’ll go in principle and vote against the adoption of the amendments. At the same time, I’ll celebrate Lenin’s grandfather’s birthday.

Why have Russian polling stations opened there?!

[Alex bergman]

We must vote “against” until they break everything down on the ballot item by item! And vote point by point. Then it will work out honestly!!!

[Protos]

Quote: Tatiana

Earlier, the working group reported that there would be no specification of amendments to the ballot in the referendum. The question will sound something like this: “Do you support changes to the Constitution of Russia?” There are two possible answers: yes and no.

I knew that in the amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, those in power behind the people would mix honey benefits and impunity for their loved ones and worsening lives for working people!
Vote, good people, as in a strange scumbag unknown to anyone!
The government mobilizes the administrative resource for voting - and everything will be adopted in the Constitution of the Russian Federation!

I, as a sane Russian, don’t want to be drunk a second time along with Crimea in some Ukraine
Therefore, I will vote for pro-Russian amendments!

[Protos]

Quote: Rostislav

Rave. How can I vote without seeing a specific text? And when a few corrections. I agree with 2, let's say, but I don’t agree with 2 others. What `s next?
Such a statement of the issue of pure water is a profanation of the very idea of ​​a referendum.

All the amendments are available on the Internet, they are quite voluminous, and therefore they must be voted on as a package!

[29dest]

Quote: Protos

Quote: Rostislav

Rave. How can I vote without seeing a specific text? And when a few corrections. I agree with 2, let's say, but I don’t agree with 2 others. What `s next?
Such a statement of the issue of pure water is a profanation of the very idea of ​​a referendum.

All the amendments are available on the Internet, they are quite voluminous, and therefore they must be voted on as a package!

Is there already a federal law on the method of formation and powers of the State Council on the internet? Are you “like a sensible Russian” going to vote for an undefined new body of power? For a constitutional coup that was criminal for Russia? I am very sorry that I live in the same country with such sensible people...

[Protos]

Quote: karabass

In any orthodox society, 2% of men are homosexual, in a depraved society there are 10% of them, but they are already bisexual (due to promiscuity). This is in modern society! In the ancients, even purely heterosexual men had to have homosexual relationships in order not to be branded as a flawed degenerate
What I mean is that 50% CANNOT be homosexual! this is the first thing! Secondly, MORE than 50% of us in Russia drink!
But no one in their SENSE mind would propose to write something like this into our Constitution

Well... you know better there in Ukraine for the gays...

[Protos]

Quote: fa2998

Quote: carstorm 11

No one pays 5-6 thousand. Why write these nonsense? The Labor Code of the Russian Federation clearly defines that a salary less than the living wage is not allowed. Reduced wages are a problem not only for the employee, but also for the employer, because according to Article 133 of the Labor Code, the salary cannot be lower than the officially fixed value of the living wage. I have never met anyone who is not so friendly with his head that this would violate.

Where do you live? In Moscow? In the outback, and even if it’s a day \ 2-3. The guard receives 5-7 thousand. A spouse says the hospital recently had a salary of a nurse-4600. At the janitor, the cleaners in the housing office, 5-7 thousand are a constant fluid. City beggar, subsidized. Come, do not be a dreamer.

What the hell?!
From January 1, 2019, according to Art. 1 of the Federal Law of June 19.06.2000, 82 No. 07.03.2018-FZ (as amended on March 11, 280) “On the minimum wage” The minimum wage is XNUMX rubles per month
If it’s less than full time, then it’s criminally and administratively prosecuted, as is failure to pay it!
In your “poor, subsidized city” you probably get in hryvnias, but in rubles it turns out so little

[Al Asad]

I'm interested in two things:
1 Is anyone else tired of this circus of playing at democracy in an authoritarian state? There are no other problems in the country? Or if behind the Kremlin walls they eat black caviar with spoons, then everything is fine with everyone.
2.And how many billions of rubles (as we know, we have no money in the state) will be spent on this farce?

[Roman070280]

They don’t care.. everything is paid from our pocket anyway..
Let's whip ourselves again...

[Al Asad]

Quote: Tonya

150 from the day of Lenin’s birth) this is very important now, I think like other referenda will be held almost unanimously))))))))))) that’s why the GDP will be crowned

He’s not a particularly modest guy anyway. He crowned himself a long time ago. At least for the duration of his reign, he shouldered the royal goals upon himself. True, so far the only goals that turn out to be are to enrich oligarchs and produce batches of them and put his friends in luxurious places and give gifts

[BOR-5]

Has anyone seen the full list of amendments? Can you provide a link for example?
And then the date was set, but for what - not yet.
All this farce and hypocrisy is already infuriating. First, they used tricks in the laws to destroy the remnants of industry. Now they are setting such a qualification so that no one can land them.
Just like with the Duma under Nicholas 2.

[Imperial Technocrat]

I'll definitely go. This is a new era in Russian history

[Alex bergman]

"minus". Is there a reason for the minus? Or so... automatically...???
“Fresh Regs” are not welcome here! They don’t take root! ;)))))))

[nikvic46]

At all times, people have been interested in the law on land. Now there is a conversation about restoring “respect for human work.” This article was written when people had the right to work. There is a desire to pass some articles by voting. For example, there was a proposal to consider employers are the basis for creating an economy. From memory: “Why do you think that the people will avoid voting on articles of the Constitution? After all, they voted for Yeltsin” - the famous Boris Borisych.

[Den Sangoysky]

This is how democracy dies, we sacrifice our lives in exchange for one non-working environment

[3vs]

Earlier, the working group reported that there would be no specification of amendments to the ballot in the referendum. The question will sound something like this: “Do you support changes to the Constitution of Russia?” There are two possible answers: yes and no.

What the hell is this?!
Vote for a pig in a poke?
Please be kind enough to post a package of all planned changes to the Constitution on public resources,
on public services, in central newspapers, social networks - Odnoklassniki, Vkontakte and other means
mass media.

[RUS96]

Quote: Askold Matveev

I will go. I'll go and vote against it on principle

Your vote against, like anyone else’s, will not change anything. It’s time to understand this a long time ago.

[mi ah]

Go, don’t go, vote for or against - what difference does it make - anyway, in a single impulse, with 95 - 98 percent of the votes, the new constitution will be adopted. As I understand it, there are enough useful things in it. And small inclusions of shit... Nobody will let you split it up, take it in bulk. Well, even if not (which I personally doubt), then we’ll “work it out” and it will still be accepted

[faterdom]

Among other things, I was amazed by the proposal for an amendment “on the humane treatment of animals”! This is in the Constitution, the main Law, which should state who we are, what we are, what we want from the state, what we guarantee, and what we guarantee. That is, ideological and social norms of existence.
And for us - about animals... Will there be a list of animals? Up to what size? Class? Mammals? Amphibians? Insects? Is fumigator unconstitutional?
This is profanation, and not on purpose, these are people randomly gathered with their own concepts about the subject.
And everything should be crowned with a non-binding “vote” for, supposedly, legitimizing those changes that we do not know about, but which in fact are needed by someone and for some reason. There are too many vague and unnecessary things for such an important issue.
I remember Pugacheva’s song “Yes-Yes-No-Yes!”, which, however, she has never sung since then.

[Roman070280]

You can even add to the Constitution that theft is prohibited in the Russian Federation..
And by this, attract a few more percent of hamsters who will vote FOR, shouting - “And you want us to allow theft”

[chenderoni]

for some reason I remembered the animated series The Simpsons

[tank64rus]

Americans and Canadians and our liberals have already begun to scream; finally, Putin screwed up for the first time in 20 years, after all, 22.04. Lenin's birthday.

[Nikodim]

Quote: bayard

Quote: Askold Matveev

I’ll go and vote against the adoption of the amendments.

So you, young man, for Russia to continue payments on all fake claims of the so-called international jurisdictions?
Stockholm Arbitration Court?
And Khodorkovsky is ready from the state 50 billion dollars. to break off?
Ukraine is very encouraged by such prospects.
And Poland presented something there ... for the war and "occupation", will file a lawsuit - they will satisfy, like Ukraine.
With joy .
And glee.
And to the Balts, if they are served, they are sitting without money, Europe is tired of feeding them, but through lawsuits to breed Russia - that’s it. Do not even hesitate.
Do you remember with kagoy readiness and enthusiasm IMMEDIATELY the claim of Iran against Russia for not delivered (by Medvedev's decision) S-300 air defense system was satisfied?

As I understand it, you insist on such a strand of things?

Have you thought well about your choice?
Or what liberal-patriotic wind blew your ears.
Or do you have nothing to do with Russia?
It seems like that.

And grandfather Lenin, .... is capitalized, for it is a pseudonym \ party nickname of V.I. Ulyanov (Lenin).

Russia will pay for the claims, alas, in any case, regardless of what is written in Russia’s constitution. The leverage of international authorities can be very effective

[Roman070280]

The king continues to openly mock the people...

[fa2998]

Quote: carstorm 11

Firstly, I'm talking about the salary of a normal 8 hour day. she always goes the benchmark. the watchman and stuff is from another opera. secondly, if someone does not follow the laws for their own benefit, this is a crime. and these organizations need to write statements and complaints. What does the region have to do with it? TK is one for all.

You are like a child! I repeat once again - the city has 100 thousand, there is NO work!!!!! (Former miner) For example, a pensioner found a part-time job for 5-7 thousand, he is happy about it, he pays utilities. Like the medical staff of our hospital I sent “Putin” the pay stubs, the next day they were with the manager, called a meeting, said, “whoever doesn’t like it, get out, and if it happens again, I’ll fire everyone to hell.” Everything is “tied up.” By the way, our director of the Housing Office has a son in the prosecutor's office, won't he cover up for dad? People are wiping their paws... yes, with this Constitution and laws they are wiping themselves in certain places.

[Victor N]

If “work” doesn’t come to you, go to work. We need to look for options, and not criticize the Constitution and laws. If only because it is completely useless.

[Galina schreder]

Great. We must go and vote. I will go and take all my relatives. Let's vote FOR

[Igoresha]

Great. We must go and vote. I will go and take all my relatives. Let's vote FOR

and take a look at MMM, maybe there are dividends there))

[ric]

Read carefully about the amendments to the constitution, there may be a nullification of the presidential terms, and the article on two terms may be excluded altogether.

[remal]

They started talking about the return of foreign assets to the USSR, instead of dealing with the acquisition of USSR assets by Yukos. All because of the same 50 billion euros. In Ukraine, all this is simply resolved, the “reprivatization” of the desired company is announced, and the takeover deal is canceled. In our country, they rush around with this as if it were a sacred cow, listening to the liberals. Private property is ownership of what a person has earned through his own labor. And if hydroelectric power stations were built by the whole country, how can there be property there?