Military Review

On the day of the 150th anniversary of the birth of Lenin: Putin approved the date of the referendum on the Constitution

368

It became known that the working group on amending the Constitution made a proposal on the date of the referendum. Recall that the question of amending the basic law will be put to a popular vote.


The date of such a vote was proposed to be made on April 22. And just a few minutes ago it became known that Vladimir Putin approved the proposal by date. Information on the support expressed by the president was expressed by the head of the Kremlin press service Dmitry Peskov.

It must be emphasized that April 22 in 2020 is Wednesday. But, as was previously announced, the day of voting will not be a day off, but the state will make it that way. In this case, we can say with confidence that on April 22 this year will be officially a non-working day precisely in connection with the fact that Russians will be expected at polling stations that day.

Earlier, the working group reported that there would be no specification of amendments to the ballot in the referendum. The question will sound something like this: “Do you support changes to the Constitution of Russia?” There are two possible answers: yes and no.

The network responded to the choice of the date of voting, noting that April 22, 2020 is the 150th anniversary of the birth of Vladimir Ulyanov (Lenin).
368 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Victor_B
    Victor_B 26 February 2020 19: 13 New
    +4
    Did he ask Lenin's grandfather?
    Did he enjoy such a birthday present?
    1. dSK
      dSK 26 February 2020 19: 16 New
      -31
      There will be no "gift" from me - I will not vote.
      1. Askold Matveev
        Askold Matveev 26 February 2020 19: 18 New
        18
        I will go. I’ll go in principle and vote against the adoption of the amendments. At the same time, I’ll celebrate Lenin’s grandfather’s birthday.
        1. Range
          Range 26 February 2020 19: 31 New
          -23
          But it is known that Lenin’s real birthday is not April 22. According to the old calendar, he was born on April 10 + 13 days and it turns out according to the new calendar on April 23.
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. The comment was deleted.
                1. Tatyana
                  Tatyana 26 February 2020 19: 57 New
                  20
                  The date of such a vote was proposed to be made on April 22. And just a few minutes ago it became known that Vladimir Putin approved the proposal for the date

                  This is just an unheard of public mockery of the Soviet history of the country and its people!
                  Ay-yes Putin - ay-yes LIBERAL! So he threw off the mask of the "PEOPLE'S patriot", so he threw it off!
                  1. Victor_B
                    Victor_B 26 February 2020 20: 00 New
                    14
                    Quote: Tatiana
                    This is just an unheard of public mockery of the Soviet history of the country and its people!

                    And the fact that the Mausoleum is ALWAYS closed for all parades is a tribute to the memory?
                    1. Tatyana
                      Tatyana 26 February 2020 20: 27 New
                      10
                      Earlier, the working group reported that there would be no specification of amendments to the ballot in the referendum. The question will sound something like this: “Do you support changes to the Constitution of Russia?” There are two possible answers: yes and no.

                      I knew that in the amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, those in power behind the people would mix honey benefits and impunity for their loved ones and worsening lives for working people!
                      Vote, good people, as in a strange scumbag unknown to anyone!
                      The government mobilizes the administrative resource for voting - and everything will be adopted in the Constitution of the Russian Federation!
                      1. bk316
                        bk316 26 February 2020 21: 20 New
                        16
                        I knew that in the amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, those in power behind the people would mix honey benefits and impunity for their loved ones and worsening lives for working people!


                        Well, vote against. What is the question?
                        Weigh the pros and cons and vote. No administrative resource will change the voting results by more than percent, vote 90% against and there will be no changes.
                      2. Tatyana
                        Tatyana 26 February 2020 21: 33 New
                        17
                        Quote: bk316
                        Well, vote against. What's the question? Weigh the pros and cons and vote.

                        What to weigh from? I know some of the amendments, and they suit me. And what comes to their appendage is the mystery behind seven seals.
                        Do you understand that the provocation of such a vote by the authorities is not at all clear?
                        Essentially 1,5 months left before the vote! Amendments should be ready and publicly discussed!
                        Have you seen this somewhere? Me not.
                        Or do you think that this is not necessary at all? What do the people know and understand what is not at all appropriate?
                        What will happen in the Constitution of the Russian Federation with the presidency, with the promised State Council? This is essentially a coup in the country!
                      3. Andrey VOV
                        Andrey VOV 26 February 2020 21: 54 New
                        10
                        Today, we discussed the amendments for three hours, it would be a desire, you will find, and you will read
                      4. Reserve officer
                        Reserve officer 26 February 2020 23: 18 New
                        15
                        ... "Earlier, the working group announced that there will be no specification of amendments in the ballot at the referendum. The question will sound something like this:" Do you support amendments to the Constitution of Russia? " There are, respectively, two answer options: yes and no "...

                        Andrei, what's the point of discussing them if there is no specifics in the newsletter? And if I like something, but against something I am categorically against it? How to vote?
                        Pure profanity is all a vote. And a clear disrespect for the basic law of the state - the Constitution.
                      5. Protos
                        Protos 26 February 2020 23: 44 New
                        18
                        Quote: Stock Officer
                        ... "Earlier, the working group announced that there will be no specification of amendments in the ballot at the referendum. The question will sound something like this:" Do you support amendments to the Constitution of Russia? " There are, respectively, two answer options: yes and no "...

                        Andrei, what's the point of discussing them if there is no specifics in the newsletter? And if I like something, but against something I am categorically against it? How to vote?
                        Pure profanity is all a vote. And a clear disrespect for the basic law of the state - the Constitution.

                        The texts of the amendments are ALREADY on the SITE of the Russian government!
                      6. Misha Honest
                        Misha Honest 27 February 2020 11: 02 New
                        +1
                        Quote: Protos
                        The texts of the amendments are ALREADY on the SITE of the Russian government!

                        A reference please. And then I didn’t find anything there.
                    2. Tatyana
                      Tatyana 26 February 2020 23: 50 New
                      +1
                      Quote: Reserve officer
                      Andrei, what's the point of discussing them if there is no specifics in the newsletter? And if I like something, but against something I am categorically against it? How to vote?Pure profanity is all a vote. And a clear disrespect for the basic law of the state - the Constitution.

                      Yes, it is the purest PROFANATION - all this is a vote! Or rather, it is precisely the legitimization of a creeping coup d'etat "from above" in a beautiful wrapper on the introduction of a certain State Council and under sweet speeches for the people.
                    3. andrew42
                      andrew42 27 February 2020 21: 43 New
                      -1
                      PROFANATION, - I completely agree. Here, even on TV, I accidentally saw a fragment of the discussion of the amendments with Putin: a certain madame proposed to introduce into the Constitution a norm on a decent living wage, - the Guarantor deftly "ricocheted" the issue in the style of "the fools themselves" - let the government decide. What other expectations can there be after that? - Profanity is.
                  2. Victor N
                    Victor N 27 February 2020 08: 43 New
                    +1
                    Discuss before the vote - write, if there is WHAT. And do not have hysteria - there are many opportunities to express your opinion. Even here, in VO no one bothers. Dare!
                  3. bk316
                    bk316 27 February 2020 14: 37 New
                    +1
                    Andrei, what's the point of discussing them if there is no specifics in the newsletter?

                    Why are they on the newsletter? They are in a separate law.

                    Law of the Russian Federation on an amendment to the Constitution of the Russian Federation "On improving regulation of certain issues of organizing public authority"

                    Bill No. 885214-7

                    Or do you think when they voted for the previous Constitution, they were put on the ballot?
                2. Tatyana
                  Tatyana 26 February 2020 23: 35 New
                  -2
                  Quote: Andrey VOV
                  Today, we discussed the amendments for three hours, it would be a desire, you will find, and you will read

                  Well, here's an example of popular discussion of amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation.

                  The AMF Discussed Amendments to the Constitution. M.Delyagin 18.02.2020/XNUMX/XNUMX | Yaroslavl.Online
              2. bk316
                bk316 27 February 2020 14: 28 New
                +3
                Have you seen this somewhere? Me not.

                How much time do you need to read all corrections?
                Or do you think that they will not be published before the vote? laughing
              3. andrew42
                andrew42 27 February 2020 21: 38 New
                -1
                This notorious State Council painfully resembles the "leaders" of the times of Anna Ioannovna - in fact, they got Osterman, Minich and, in the end ... Birena (ie Biron. The question is who will be the "mother-empress" who The President will nod at the lack of authority, State Councilors will steer their loved ones for themselves, and no one will personally answer for anything. Now the guarantor will still have to mumble something on uncomfortable questions, and then it will become unnecessary.
            2. pl675
              pl675 26 February 2020 21: 53 New
              -2
              Quote: bk316
              I knew that in the amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, those in power behind the people would mix honey benefits and impunity for their loved ones and worsening lives for working people!


              Well, vote against. What is the question?
              Weigh the pros and cons and vote. No administrative resource will change the voting results by more than percent, vote 90% against and there will be no changes.


              Do you still believe in urinotherapy, in cucumbers from hemorrhoids, and Santa Claus? -
              then you are in "edro", until they changed the sign, then the entrance will rise in price.
            3. bk316
              bk316 27 February 2020 14: 41 New
              +1
              Do you still believe in urinotherapy, in cucumbers from hemorrhoids, and Santa Claus? -

              No - I believe, or rather, I am confident in mathematics. AND I KNOW that there are methods AND EVEN I AM ABOUT USING THEM belay , to determine the falsification of voting results.

              Well, people without an appropriate education like you can use urinotherapy .... laughing All the same, it remains either to study for 10 years or to believe laughing
          2. Bomb
            Bomb 27 February 2020 11: 00 New
            -1
            Then the hangers-on just announced that 64% of the population approved the amendments.
        2. Victor N
          Victor N 27 February 2020 08: 37 New
          +1
          Very important amendments prepared - Great job!
        3. Tatyana
          Tatyana 27 February 2020 12: 02 New
          0
          Quote: Victor N
          Very important amendments prepared - Great job!

          Only here a spoon of tar spoils a barrel of honey!
          The functions and composition of the State Council - this "gray horse", this "pig in a poke" - please state!
        4. bk316
          bk316 27 February 2020 14: 43 New
          +2
          The functions and composition of the State Council - this "gray horse", this "pig in a poke" - please state!

          Tatyana, are you so anxious to wait a week for the law to pass the Duma and be published?
          https://sozd.duma.gov.ru/bill/885214-7
        5. Tatyana
          Tatyana 27 February 2020 15: 10 New
          -2
          Quote: bk316
          Tatyana, can’t you wait to wait a week for the law to pass the Duma and be published? Https: //sozd.duma.gov.ru/bill/885214-7

          And after that you can change something there ?!
          The functions of the State Council should be clear now, and not later. And so we have every reason to suspect the introduction of dual power in the country. This is already tested in 1917, the path to anarchy and the collapse of the country.
        6. bk316
          bk316 27 February 2020 16: 24 New
          +3
          And after that you can change something there ?!

          You cannot change either before or after, but you can vote for or against.
          If voted against, the law will not be enforced.
          Or do you want the laws to include only those norms that you like? This does not happen, it is always a balance of interests, and you can choose whether such a balance suits you or not.

          Well, by golly it’s even uncomfortable to tell such basics, just like a child laughing
          Do not be offended ....
        7. Tatyana
          Tatyana 27 February 2020 16: 36 New
          +1
          I am simply amazed at your "EdRonov" liberal chicanery!
          As if you don’t understand what was going on!
          Only the Enemy of the people can speak and mock that way!
        8. bk316
          bk316 27 February 2020 17: 34 New
          +1
          I am simply amazed at your "EdRonov" liberal chicanery!

          Is this you to?
        9. Range
          Range 27 February 2020 19: 43 New
          +1
          Tatyana, what specific amendments do you dislike? At least one point? More specifically, please: addresses, passwords, appearances ...
        10. Tatyana
          Tatyana 27 February 2020 21: 09 New
          +2
          Quote: Spectrum
          Tatyana, what specific amendments do you dislike? At least one point?

          The functions of the new body of state power introduced by the Constitution - the State Council - are not defined.
          It was said that the State Council would be created on the basis of the Public Council under the President of the Russian Federation and the State Duma of the Russian Federation
          If earlier the members of the Public Council worked on a voluntary basis — Pugacheva even went in there — now all this shushera will receive a salary - and not a small one (!), - and will not answer for anything. And how will they get there? Just by invitation.

          Well, for example. Elena Yampolskaya - Chairman of the State Duma Committee of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation on Culture since July 25, 2018 - dragged singer and musician Makarevich to one of the committees of the State Duma of the State Duma! For what are his merits to Russia and its people? And simply, in her words, to reflect the diversity of existing opinions in the country!

          Look at the composition of all these Public Councils - these are liberal musicians, artists, journalists, writers, anti-Soviet dissidents, "Gaidarists" of perestroika times (Svanidze, Lyudmila Alekseeva, economist-privatizer Yasin, etc.), etc., in general, Russian liberal intelligentsia.
          People who have been knocked out of their professional rut by old age have simply been attached to the state budget trough to feed and balamute water in the country for people's money in the State Council!
          How do you like all this? I do not like it at all.
        11. Range
          Range 27 February 2020 21: 36 New
          +3
          Quote: Tatiana
          If earlier the members of the Public Council worked on a voluntary basis — Pugacheva even went in there — now all this shushera will receive a salary - and not a small one (!), - and will not answer for anything.

          Based on what such conclusions? The child has not yet been born and the gender is still unknown ...
        12. Tatyana
          Tatyana 27 February 2020 21: 55 New
          -2
          Quote: Spectrum
          The child has not yet been born and the gender is still unknown ..

          On ultrasound, the sex of the unborn child is already visible! So here - it is already possible to imagine what kind of functional orientation this State Council will be born.
        13. Range
          Range 27 February 2020 22: 02 New
          -1
          If the fetus has not yet formed, what kind of ultrasound? Banal Fantasy. The bomb has not yet exploded, and the fragments are already being collected.
        14. Range
          Range 27 February 2020 22: 41 New
          0
          I see. If there’s nothing to answer, get a minus. good
      2. Range
        Range 28 February 2020 17: 03 New
        +1
        Zadolbali these "clairvoyants" still have nothing, but they already know everything, they were everywhere, they themselves go to the toilet ...
  2. Victor N
    Victor N 27 February 2020 18: 11 New
    +1
    Well, you so squealing ?! Unpleasant ... You can send your suggestions. In the USSR, I sent proposals on the laws under discussion - and received answers. Everyone has a chance to be heard, it must be used. You are here at VO try to clearly state what you are offering. And it’s impossible to understand the essence behind your emotions.
  3. U-58
    U-58 27 February 2020 19: 19 New
    -2
    Do you have such a brush?
    What, to the jesters, suggestions?
    All the fuss started to create a new management chair for a new leader
  4. Range
    Range 27 February 2020 20: 06 New
    -3
    And where is it reflected in the amendments, what you said? The amendments have not yet been made public, but already a lot of negativity. One amendment already covers all the nagging about this, the one that "says" that no one can command Russia from the West. Therefore, even before the promulgation of all the amendments, there is such hysteria of an incomprehensible riffraff around the basic law of the country. You are trying in vain, Russia will still get rid of the yoke of Naglo-Saxon influence. You at least get away, but after April 22 Russia will send all sorts of eiders there, shmyagi forest and further.
  5. Lannan Shi
    Lannan Shi 27 February 2020 20: 11 New
    +2
    Quote: Spectrum
    One amendment already covers all the nagging about this - the one that "says" that no one can command Russia from the West.

    While the guarantor's friends buy bundles of apartments in London, villas in France, yachts in the Caribbean, they keep money in Switzerland and families in Spain, neither 1 amendment, nor 101, force them to act in the interests of Russia.
    Dixi.
  6. Range
    Range 27 February 2020 20: 18 New
    +1
    I duplicate my comment to the addressee (the site engine is also the provocateur by redirecting comments).
    And where is it reflected in the amendments, what you said? The amendments have not yet been made public, but already a lot of negativity. One amendment already covers all the nagging about this, the one that "says" that no one can command Russia from the West. Therefore, even before the promulgation of all the amendments, there is such hysteria of an incomprehensible riffraff around the basic law of the country. You are trying in vain, Russia will still get rid of the yoke of Naglo-Saxon influence. You at least get away, but after April 22 Russia will send all sorts of eiders there, shmyagi forest and further.
  7. Range
    Range 27 February 2020 21: 43 New
    0
    This comment above is addressed U-58, but the site engine throws it from the response position to the general branch. What's this? So conceived? Administrators, what a setup. And this is not the first mess of the site. The site engine set me up under the ban with my randomize answers. Or so get rid of those who did not like the moderators? This is mean.
  8. Range
    Range 27 February 2020 21: 46 New
    -1
    Quote: U-58
    Do you have such a brush?
    What, to the jesters, suggestions?

    All the fuss started to create a new management chair for a new leader

    This is the third attempt to comment on your ...
    And where is it reflected in the amendments, what you said? The amendments have not yet been made public, but already a lot of negativity. One amendment already covers all the nagging about this, the one that "says" that no one can command Russia from the West. Therefore, even before the promulgation of all the amendments, there is such hysteria of an incomprehensible riffraff around the basic law of the country. You are trying in vain, Russia will still get rid of the yoke of Naglo-Saxon influence. You at least get away, but after April 22 Russia will send all sorts of eiders there, shmyagi forest and further.
  • The comment was deleted.
    1. SARANCHA1976
      SARANCHA1976 26 February 2020 20: 58 New
      12
      listen to you here 50/50 half drinks - half latent (and maybe real)
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. The comment was deleted.
      2. Victor_B
        Victor_B 27 February 2020 02: 10 New
        +4
        Quote: karabass
        In any orthodox society, 2% of men are homosexual

        ... according to homosexual scholars.
        Or rather, some rating agencies, such as the Levada Center (a foreign agent - officially), which are most likely led by homosexuals. They did not conduct a survey among miners, combine operators, locksmiths and welders, but among creative parties, and there they underestimated because there really will be 50%.
        Fool our brother!

        I believe that nobody will read me apart from Karabas.
        The topic has already drowned.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • The comment was deleted.
    1. Victor_B
      Victor_B 26 February 2020 20: 11 New
      +3
      Looks cool ...
    2. Sergey Averchenkov
      Sergey Averchenkov 26 February 2020 20: 29 New
      +7
      You know, but I would write ... Without any bite.
      1. Victor_B
        Victor_B 26 February 2020 20: 34 New
        -4
        Quote: Sergey Averchenkov
        You know, but I would write ... Without any bite.

        And disperse half of the "artists"!
        For!
        (Practice plz (!) The calculation procedure and what to do with the calculated next?)
        And so yes! Many need to present a filthy broom!
        By the way, not only "praative".
        1. lucul
          lucul 26 February 2020 22: 28 New
          +5
          And disperse half of the "artists"!

          It would not hurt .....
    3. Sergey Averchenkov
      Sergey Averchenkov 26 February 2020 20: 37 New
      -1
      I can’t understand you. Do you want to suggest that I sleep with some man, and not with my wife? Have your brains atrophied? . And yes, I suggest to enter.
      1. astepanov
        astepanov 26 February 2020 20: 45 New
        +9
        Quote: Sergey Averchenkov
        I can’t understand you. Do you want to suggest that I sleep with some man, and not with my wife? Have your brains atrophied? . And yes, I suggest to enter.
        Those. you want to say that if the Constitution does not have a separate article against homosexuality, then you have to become this ... how is it ...? I think that with a high degree of probability such an amendment in the Basic Law will not be. So get ready. wassat
        1. Sergey Averchenkov
          Sergey Averchenkov 26 February 2020 21: 08 New
          -8
          I don’t want to write anything in, or write it in, you’re so tired of me, you don’t even imagine ... Pederasts.
        2. nikvic46
          nikvic46 27 February 2020 06: 15 New
          +2
          Alexei. You are right. You cannot make a moral treatise from the Constitution.
        3. Sergey Averchenkov
          Sergey Averchenkov 27 February 2020 10: 41 New
          0
          You are right, something has incurred me. But such an article would not be out of place. It’s just that our country would be ... normal - a man, a woman, children ...
      2. Aag
        Aag 27 February 2020 09: 43 New
        +2
        Yes, yes, yes !!! You also need to enter so that you do not urinate past the toilet ...
    4. Nyrobsky
      Nyrobsky 26 February 2020 21: 59 New
      19
      Quote: karabass
      Please decipher it. WHAT do you mean? Do you propose to include a separate article against homosexuals in the Basic Law?

      Sorry, of course, but I mean that the Constitution proposes to consolidate the concept that "a family is a marriage between a man and a woman," which further excludes any options like "parent # 1" and "parent # 2" under koi you can bring the marriage of two numbered homosexuals, or two numbered lesbians, which is now practiced in Europe and the United States. Are you against?
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. Nyrobsky
          Nyrobsky 26 February 2020 22: 10 New
          13
          Well, as it were, the person didn’t reveal the topic, but on the whole the message was correct - he was a vegetable, not our Russian family. hi
  • SARANCHA1976
    SARANCHA1976 26 February 2020 20: 54 New
    +3
    can you at least clearly say what kind of changes are in front of such rebuffs full of righteous anger?
  • Ross xnumx
    Ross xnumx 26 February 2020 20: 44 New
    +6
    Quote: Spectrum
    According to the old calendar, he was born on April 10 + 13 days and it turns out according to the new calendar on April 23.

    But what’s Lenin’s birthday there ... It’s necessary to postpone Christmas on January 8 ... And the day of the fulfillment of the Sunday - on November 8 ... belay
    So they didn’t have time to ask you ... And maybe they asked ... Yes, in your ears the sunflowers are stuck ...
    request
  • Malyuta
    Malyuta 26 February 2020 22: 24 New
    0
    Quote: Spectrum
    But it is known that Lenin’s real birthday is not April 22. According to the old calendar, he was born on April 10 + 13 days and it turns out according to the new calendar on April 23.

    Priests often confused metrics.
    1. rruvim
      rruvim 26 February 2020 23: 22 New
      -5
      In general, Ilya Nikolayevich Ulyanov (Lenin's father) was a serious person, he understood the metrics worse than priests. And if Maria Alexandrovna Blank decided to appoint a date of birth for her child on April 10, then no priest would have opposed this. Kabbalah however ... And were there any priests? There is no evidence that infant Volodimir was baptized.
      1. Malyuta
        Malyuta 26 February 2020 23: 52 New
        -1
        Quote: rruvim
        Kabbalah however ...

        The first episode of the serial film "The Sealed Carriage" or "Bloody Lenin Drinking Blood Directly from Children". from the trilogy "About Three Spikelets".
        A colleague, believe me, in the pedigrees of Lavrov, Mishustin and other non-Dimonov there is a much more interesting texture study.
        1. rruvim
          rruvim 26 February 2020 23: 56 New
          0
          Of course have. I mean, to argue about whether Vladimir Ilyich was born on the evening of April 9 or in the morning of the 10th, those who are interested in zodiac or kabalistic moments can. For ignorant of these nuances of mankind, the date of birth of the Leader in a drum.
    2. Range
      Range 27 February 2020 21: 58 New
      0
      Quote: Malyuta
      Priests often confused metrics.

      But after all, according to the old style and all the documents, Ulyanov-Lenin was born on April 10, and then according to the new one, what number is obtained?
  • Yu-81
    Yu-81 27 February 2020 06: 52 New
    +1
    But it is known that Lenin’s real birthday is not April 22. According to the old calendar, he was born on April 10 + 13 days and it turns out according to the new calendar on April 23.


    26.01.1918/XNUMX/XNUMX The Council of People's Commissars adopted a decree on the transition to the Western European calendar. Recalculation is carried out depending on the century:
    20th century +13 days
    19th century +12 days
    18th century +11 days
    In what century was Lenin born? At 19. Therefore, you need to add 12 days, not 13. But this is not known to grammars from mathematics and history. Therefore, fools celebrate November 4, although on this day nothing significant happened in history. He didn’t make out the same grammar + 13 days, without regard to in which century the event happened and was normal, so there it will come down!
    1. Magog
      Magog 27 February 2020 10: 51 New
      0
      Therefore, fools celebrate November 4, although on this day nothing significant happened in history.
      "RG Skrynnikov notes not only a number of chronological inconsistencies in existing sources, but also a direct revision of the Siberian chronicles, for example, the Byzantine events taken from the" Moscow Chronograph "of 1512, with their replacement by the Moscow Troubles of 1612, when This replaces the confrontation between the Byzantines and the Bulgarians with the confrontation between the Poles, on the one hand, and Muscovites with the Germans (!), on the other. " And what really happened - go and figure it out ...
    2. Range
      Range 27 February 2020 23: 02 New
      +1
      Quote: yu-xnumx
      26.01.1918/XNUMX/XNUMX The Council of People's Commissars adopted a decree on the transition to the Western European calendar. Recalculation is carried out depending on the century:
      20th century +13 days
      19th century +12 days
      18th century +11 days
      In what century was Lenin born? At 19. Therefore, you need to add 12 days, not 13. But this is not known to grammars from mathematics and history. Therefore, fools celebrate November 4, although on this day nothing significant happened in history. He didn’t make out the same grammar + 13 days, without regard to in which century the event happened and was normal, so there it will come down!


      Now the street is the 21st century, it means + 14, and then it leaves on April 24th. Cool! bully
      And Christmas +0? Century is zero. Or + 13. Cool arithmetic. wassat
      So the Nativity of Christ on December 25th or January 7th?
  • Naz
    Naz 27 February 2020 08: 29 New
    0
    The party said 22, which means 22. And then +, -.
  • Dmitry Potapov
    Dmitry Potapov 26 February 2020 19: 37 New
    -1
    Correctly!!! And it will be a worthy response of a free citizen!
    1. Victor_B
      Victor_B 26 February 2020 19: 46 New
      -2
      Quote: Dmitry Potapov
      Correctly!!! And it will be a worthy response of a free citizen!

      I am embarrassed to ask - actually to whom or what did you answer so freely? what
      Or what?
      1. Range
        Range 27 February 2020 23: 21 New
        0
        Quote: Victor_B
        Quote: Dmitry Potapov
        Correctly!!! And it will be a worthy response of a free citizen!

        I am embarrassed to ask - actually to whom or what did you answer so freely? what
        Or what?


        This engine or site operator shuffles the answers as he pleases. I got into a ban like this (a man insulted me, but wrote to another, I answered him, although the answer was slipped and as a result the ban got both. That's how the elect are pushed foreheads. The owner of the site is from the Promised Land). Keep this in mind do not fall into the trap of the owners of the site.
  • figwam
    figwam 26 February 2020 19: 58 New
    +7
    Quote: Askold Matveev
    I will go. I’ll go in principle and vote against the adoption of the amendments.

    In your opinion, let officials remain dual citizenship, and the laws of NATO countries will be higher than ours? And the constitution is unchanged - Yeltsin, pah.
    1. Askold Matveev
      Askold Matveev 26 February 2020 20: 22 New
      12
      amendments to the constitution cannot be corrected. I think we need to adopt a completely new constitution of our country.
      1. figwam
        figwam 26 February 2020 20: 51 New
        +1
        Quote: Askold Matveev
        amendments to the constitution cannot be corrected. I think we need to adopt a completely new constitution of our country.

        Unfortunately, if you vote against, they will not accept the new constitution.
        1. Misha Honest
          Misha Honest 27 February 2020 11: 16 New
          +1
          Quote: figvam
          Unfortunately, if you vote against, they will not accept the new constitution.
          In any case, no one will accept a new one. Until the power changes ... request
          But now, just like air, we need exactly a completely new constitution.
    2. Private89
      Private89 26 February 2020 20: 37 New
      24
      They do not comply with this constitution, why will they become after the amendments? In the Russian Federation, the social state is written in the constitution. The people in this social state are dying. Subsoil belongs to the people - a law has been passed by which it is possible to lease subsoil. And so where do not spit. And the essence of all the amendments is to push the state council and sit there as a pharaoh. They carry out pension reform, face taxes and still want us to legitimize their power forever.
    3. spirit
      spirit 26 February 2020 20: 41 New
      15
      So the question is all that everything is presented in a row, that separately for each amendment to the GDP the bench press can be made) and so it looks like a handout for the mob here is ours and yours a bit hi
      1. Sotskiy
        Sotskiy 26 February 2020 21: 45 New
        +6
        Quote: spirit
        So the question is that everything is presented in a row, that individually, for each amendment to the GDP, the bench press can be done)

        Look what you’ve conceived separately! lol We have a market in our yard. No disinterested relationship! So only wholesale. Oh! repeat The general list.
        The people are amendments that are already in fact spelled out in federal laws (who would implement them), and the top-power. So everything is fair, market lol
      2. Malyuta
        Malyuta 26 February 2020 22: 26 New
        0
        Quote: spirit
        So the question is all that everything is presented in a row, that separately for each amendment to the GDP the bench press can be made) and so it looks like a handout for the mob here is ours and yours a bit

        This is called the tops for you, and the roots for us!
      3. Nikolai Grek
        Nikolai Grek 26 February 2020 23: 57 New
        +1
        Quote: spirit
        that individually for each amendment

        what Well then you yourself will whine that a bunch of buzhki will have to be taken apart !! wassat laughing
      4. Victor N
        Victor N 27 February 2020 08: 57 New
        0
        Write, major, write! Right here and now! Or nothing?
        1. Victor N
          Victor N 27 February 2020 18: 11 New
          +1
          So nothing ....
    4. Ross xnumx
      Ross xnumx 26 February 2020 20: 51 New
      24
      Quote: figvam
      In your opinion, let officials remain dual citizenship

      You already forgot that the whole procedure was contemplated for the establishment of the State Council.
      In normal documents, each amendment is voted separately. And only flies are beaten together:
      "Seven - in one stroke" ... laughing
      And at the end of the term, all these Putin’s “quacks” look like convulsions ... We did not accept the Yeltsin’s constitution (the Soviet suited it), but we were forced to live on it. And they voted against the dissolution of the USSR, but they did everything at the instigation ...
      In a word, look so that you do not get 146 percent ...
      1. U-58
        U-58 27 February 2020 19: 24 New
        0
        Well, about 146 you turned down, but 76% - they definitely will.
        They know how ...
    5. Private89
      Private89 26 February 2020 20: 55 New
      17
      And what is stopping now “our” authorities from simply not signing those treaties that are not beneficial for the country and not entering into those structures that limit sovereignty, not to mention the absence of an entry in the constitution?
      1. figwam
        figwam 26 February 2020 20: 59 New
        -8
        Quote: Private 89
        And what is stopping "our" government now from simply not signing those treaties,

        The current Constitution does not allow.
        1. Romey
          Romey 26 February 2020 22: 00 New
          +5
          Are you also an admirer of the creatures of the wife of Fedorov?
          1. figwam
            figwam 26 February 2020 22: 07 New
            +1
            Quote: romey
            Are you also an admirer of the creatures of the wife of Fedorov?

            What is the wife of Fedorov?
            1. Malyuta
              Malyuta 26 February 2020 23: 17 New
              +4
              Quote: figvam
              Quote: romey
              Are you also an admirer of the creatures of the wife of Fedorov?

              What is the wife of Fedorov?

              The ideologist of GCD, such as dibs from Putin's squads.
              1. Genry
                Genry 27 February 2020 01: 23 New
                -2
                Quote: Malyuta
                The ideologist of GCD, such as dibs from Putin's squads.

                Well manifested ....
                Now it remains to find out what territory you are broadcasting from.
                1. Romey
                  Romey 27 February 2020 11: 36 New
                  -1
                  Flag in hand. Find out. Just do not be surprised that from Voronezh, which must be bombed.
    6. SARANCHA1976
      SARANCHA1976 26 February 2020 20: 59 New
      +3
      Do you really think that the whole government will rise and leave?
      1. figwam
        figwam 26 February 2020 21: 02 New
        -1
        Quote: SARANCHA1976
        Do you really think that the whole government will rise and leave?

        Where were you when the entire Medvedev government resigned?
        1. Romey
          Romey 26 February 2020 22: 02 New
          +2
          Well, and who came to replace the departed? Ghouls are worse than before. Especially the author of the ege delivered ...
          1. figwam
            figwam 26 February 2020 22: 45 New
            -3
            Quote: romey
            Well, and who came to replace the departed? Ghouls are worse than before. Especially the author of the ege delivered ...

            You chose Zelensky for yourself, and deal with him, but do not meddle in our affairs.
            1. Romey
              Romey 27 February 2020 07: 28 New
              -2
              Native American hut, and how many do you take upon yourself, deprive me of citizenship?
              1. figwam
                figwam 27 February 2020 09: 49 New
                -3
                Quote: romey
                Native American hut, and how many do you take upon yourself, deprive me of citizenship?

                How many do you have?
                1. Romey
                  Romey 27 February 2020 11: 29 New
                  -1
                  One thing. RF And you? Two? Three? Or just a residence permit, like your Shapiro?
        2. Bomb
          Bomb 27 February 2020 12: 22 New
          0
          Changing the government is like waving a newspaper over shit, flies are removed, buzzing, and then they sit back.
        3. SARANCHA1976
          SARANCHA1976 27 February 2020 14: 08 New
          0
          Meant the government and not the Cabinet.
      2. bk316
        bk316 26 February 2020 21: 27 New
        +6
        Do you really think that the whole government will rise and leave?

        Uh ... So it already went that way. belay Encore again? repeat
    7. DymOk_v_dYmke
      DymOk_v_dYmke 27 February 2020 05: 00 New
      -2
      Quote: figvam
      In your opinion, let officials remain dual citizenship, and the laws of NATO countries will be higher than ours?

      Most are for the prohibition of dual citizenship.
      However, there is also a "squiggle" here: isn't there a ban on dual citizenship by cleaning up "glades" for themselves by those
      who without formal second citizenship have the right to receive it at any time?
      Semibankirshchina can be remembered ...
    8. AUL
      AUL 27 February 2020 08: 35 New
      +2
      The fact of the matter is that, under the guise of a couple of really necessary amendments, a number of positions are introduced to us that legitimize the existing lawlessness. As a result, the overall result of these amendments will not be in our favor. Therefore, everything is taken to the vote in bulk, and not for each amendment specifically. Therefore, I will vote against this scam.
      1. SARANCHA1976
        SARANCHA1976 27 February 2020 14: 24 New
        -1
        Very accurate definition.
  • Nikolay Ivanov_5
    Nikolay Ivanov_5 26 February 2020 20: 35 New
    10
    And will you even read constitutional amendments?
  • astepanov
    astepanov 26 February 2020 21: 00 New
    +8
    So, on April 2, the amendments should be considered in the second reading. Not the fact that they will. Then they should hone the wording, agree with the text of the current Constitution ... Then they should be studied, reviewed and approved in all subjects of the federation. Suppose, still two weeks. Then they must publish so that the people think it over. Some more time will go. And there will be time to think about everything, nothing. But this is the Constitution, not some kind of nonsense. And then the vote - in bulk, and among good initiatives you can cram as much as you want complete nonsense, or even completely noose. Something seems to me that, under the guise of Putin's initiatives, they want to give us rotten fish in the appendage. In the bazaar, this is usually done: on top is a good product, and under it ...
    1. kjhg
      kjhg 26 February 2020 21: 23 New
      +7
      Quote: astepanov
      Something seems to me that, under the guise of Putin's initiatives, they want to give us rotten fish in the appendage. In the bazaar, this is usually done: on top is a good product, and under it ...

      Believe me, it does not seem to you. All this is started precisely for this purpose. But sheep are never destined to understand that they are kept for wool and meat.
      1. RideMaster
        RideMaster 26 February 2020 22: 21 New
        -9
        You want him to believe the unfounded comment. Not a single fact, but only a stamp about rams. Yes, you my friend propagandist.
    2. SARANCHA1976
      SARANCHA1976 27 February 2020 14: 27 New
      0
      From the series, life will become better but you still have to walk with panties on your head .. And you stand so thoughtful;)
      1. Range
        Range 27 February 2020 22: 56 New
        +4
        Quote: SARANCHA1976
        From the series, life will become better but you still have to walk with panties on your head .. And you stand so thoughtful;)

        The engine will throw out the response branches anyway, so I quote.
        And here is the answer to you opus.
        "The Russians put a record amount on their current accounts in banks in 2019, the share of individuals' funds increased to 26% of the total volume of attracted retail resources.
        Thus, in total equivalent, the amount of funds of Russians in current accounts has reached 8 trillion rubles. In 2018, the figures were 19,4% lower. "

        Where’s Ben’s underpants?
        1. SARANCHA1976
          SARANCHA1976 28 February 2020 02: 45 New
          -1
          The percentage of Russians who put them do not want to voice?
  • smart ass
    smart ass 26 February 2020 21: 04 New
    +8
    I remember that there were also working groups and voting on pension reform .... everyone knows the result
  • knn54
    knn54 26 February 2020 21: 29 New
    +7
    -It should be emphasized that April 22 in 2020 is Wednesday.
    Petka writes an ad: "The division's party meeting will take place on Tuesday" "Asks Vasily Ivanovich:
    -: How correct is Tuesday or Tuesday?
    Vasily Ivanovich (leafing through the spelling dictionary):
    - In the dictionary with the letter "f" there is no such word at all! Write: "The division's party meeting will take place on Wednesday" ...
  • Campanella
    Campanella 26 February 2020 21: 29 New
    +2
    The dilemma, the old constitution is bad, the new one is not clear for whom it is written ... It will be necessary to think hard.
  • snake
    snake 26 February 2020 21: 57 New
    0
    Quote: Askold Matveev
    I will go. I’ll go in principle and vote against the adoption of the amendments.

    No need to walk. The authorities will draw only the result they need (for the first time or what?). But by going to the "elections", you ensure the legitimization of this very circus called "elections". The people should "keep silent" and not play games with swindlers, in which the outcome is predetermined by swindlers in their favor.
    1. SARANCHA1976
      SARANCHA1976 27 February 2020 14: 28 New
      0
      Then apply the default settings;)
  • The comment was deleted.
  • bayard
    bayard 27 February 2020 00: 21 New
    -3
    Quote: Askold Matveev
    I’ll go and vote against the adoption of the amendments.

    So you, young man, for Russia to continue payments on all fake claims of the so-called international jurisdictions?
    Stockholm Arbitration Court?
    And Khodorkovsky is ready from the state 50 billion dollars. to break off?
    Ukraine is very encouraged by such prospects.
    And Poland presented something there ... for the war and "occupation", will file a lawsuit - they will satisfy, like Ukraine.
    With joy .
    And glee.
    And to the Balts, if they are served, they are sitting without money, Europe is tired of feeding them, but through lawsuits to breed Russia - that’s it. Do not even hesitate.
    Do you remember with kagoy readiness and enthusiasm IMMEDIATELY the claim of Iran against Russia for not delivered (by Medvedev's decision) S-300 air defense system was satisfied?

    As I understand it, you insist on such a strand of things?
    fool No.
    stop Have you thought well about your choice?
    Or what liberal-patriotic wind blew your ears.
    Or do you have nothing to do with Russia?
    It seems like that.

    And grandfather Lenin, .... is capitalized, for it is a pseudonym \ party nickname of V.I. Ulyanov (Lenin).
    1. SARANCHA1976
      SARANCHA1976 27 February 2020 14: 32 New
      -2
      Take off your pink glasses if the court is not in our favor and we won’t give money, they will take away property and assets abroad and they won’t scratch that our law will be more important
      1. bayard
        bayard 27 February 2020 19: 53 New
        +2
        Only an obligation to subordinate Russian legislation to international law gives supranational courts the power to pass such sentences. They can confiscate Russian property under the LAW only thanks to our consent, our international obligations.
        If the constitutional norms of the Russian Federation directly PROHIBIT such practice, it will be "their word against ours." And attempts to alienate property - without limit and direct CRIME in accordance with the Constitution of the Russian Federation.
        Do you understand?
        Thanks to amendments to its Constitution, Russia will be able to denounce ALL international obligations contrary to its Constitution.
        Including the law on the Central Bank.
        Do you even remember who wrote the Constitution to us in 1993? And under what circumstances?
        They wrote such a thing there that their consulting companies are still writing laws / bills to us.
        For the Duma!
        Do you really think this is normal?
        Me not .
        Or do you like juvenile justice after all?
        But you will not send this trash out of the country - the Constitution does not allow, like many other things ... does not allow.
        After editing - will allow.
        Only for one such opportunity is to terminate shameful obligations; these amendments must be accepted.
        Do not follow the crowd hysteria, think with your own head.
        Leisurely .
        Attentively and responsibly.

        After the pension reform, you began to think so radically?
        And why did it become possible?
        Indeed, just a couple of weeks before the raised liberals' sabbath (for its adoption), Putin clearly announced that he considered this reform to be untimely and that there was money in the budget for retirement. Why did they sell it all the same?
        Because Russia was OBLIGED to accept it.
        Plus an ultimatum about mass attacks in the football championship.

        Therefore, I ask again:
        DO NOT YOU CHANGE ANYTHING?
  • Llur
    Llur 27 February 2020 10: 55 New
    0
    It makes absolutely no difference whether you vote or not, your appearance is important. Do you really think that the choice of the population has any significance for the government? Not the choice is important, the turnout is important - then the vote is recognized as valid. And if the people completely ignore it, then the authorities will have problems ...
    1. Range
      Range 28 February 2020 19: 27 New
      +2
      What points of changes in the constitution do you dislike. Specifically and with the indication of the text, and keep general phrases like "truncated" with you. There is still no specific data on the amendments, and clairvoyants from the sub-Penguinists are already throwing a liquid consistency at the fan in full. At least you try for it, but Russia will still come out from under the influence of the sub-dynasty from across the ocean.
  • Bomb
    Bomb 27 February 2020 11: 07 New
    -1
    Not for that, the muzhuhuks came up with amendments so that some peasants would spoil everything with their votes. They will.
  • Roman070280
    Roman070280 27 February 2020 12: 06 New
    -1
    I will go. I’ll go in principle and vote against the adoption of the amendments. At the same time, I’ll celebrate the birthday of Grandfather Lenin.

    The only right decision !!
    We must go .. but indulge these crooks - in no case ..
    1. Llur
      Llur 1 March 2020 14: 14 New
      -1
      The only right decision is not to vote at all. You cannot beat the devil by playing by his rules.
  • Ilya-spb
    Ilya-spb 26 February 2020 19: 38 New
    +9
    Cheers, comrades!

    All to vote!

    You give the April theses!

    Earth - to the peasants!
    Factories to the workers!
    Peace to the nations!
    1. Victor_B
      Victor_B 26 February 2020 19: 47 New
      -2
      Quote: Ilya-spb
      You give the April theses!

      By the way, yes!
      A great idea!
      In the sense of the term.
      1. Malyuta
        Malyuta 26 February 2020 22: 29 New
        -3
        Quote: Victor_B
        By the way, yes! An excellent idea! In the sense of the term.

        For sure, they ate everyone to come out with posters and accordions. To celebrate their birthday, but not to vote
    2. Private89
      Private89 26 February 2020 20: 38 New
      +9
      And power to the councils!
      1. pl675
        pl675 26 February 2020 21: 40 New
        +1
        Quote: Private 89
        And power to the council of the cooperative and judoka!
    3. pl675
      pl675 26 February 2020 20: 57 New
      12
      Quote: Ilya-spb
      Cheers, comrades!

      All to vote!

      You give the April theses!

      Earth - to the peasants!
      Factories to the workers!
      Peace to the nations!


      logging allowed !.
      seaweed on the way!
      1. SARANCHA1976
        SARANCHA1976 27 February 2020 14: 34 New
        -2
        Do not tell me where to get coupons for deadwood?
    4. rruvim
      rruvim 26 February 2020 23: 26 New
      -4
      The voting results - the media!
    5. Nehist
      Nehist 27 February 2020 11: 03 New
      -1
      Along the way, there will be one thesis in this vote!
      CROSSES to earthlings
  • Malyuta
    Malyuta 26 February 2020 22: 21 New
    +5
    And I will vote for Vladimir Ilyich instead of Vladimir vladimirych!
    Long live the USSR! Workers of All Countries Unite !!!
    NO PASARAN !!!
  • Lontus
    Lontus 26 February 2020 23: 10 New
    11
    Quote: dsk
    There will be no "gift" from me - I will not vote.

    The boycott strategy is untenable.
    Faking the turnout is easier than the outcome of the protest vote.
    Do not forget about exit polls - only a person who went to the site can affect them, and it is harder and more impossible for rogues to control exit polls in the areas.
    The man whose voice was stolen is more active and meaner than the boycott.
    Voting against delivers orders of magnitude more problems to crooks than a boycott.
    It is possible to control the voting process more efficiently, where there is a significant protest population who came to the polls.
    In addition, the political culture of the population is increasing.
  • U-58
    U-58 27 February 2020 19: 16 New
    +1
    Do not go
    That is, vote for?
    And I will go and vote. Against
  • Igoresha
    Igoresha 28 February 2020 12: 14 New
    -1
    There will be no "gift" from me - I will not vote.


    gray mass which is not citizens but population argued with songs and enthusiasm, like tse bulo in Ukraine with the election of Zelensky and his gang of lay people. They will again be fooled and rightly so, and smart people who do not participate in scam will stay at home and play on the computer for pleasure.
  • Svarog
    Svarog 26 February 2020 19: 18 New
    0
    The network responded to the choice of the date of voting, noting that April 22, 2020 is the 150th anniversary of the birth of Vladimir Ulyanov (Lenin).

    Yeah, if he had returned the Constitution of 1936, it would have seemed harmonious ..
    I thought he would approve on April 1 .. since April 1, I don’t believe anyone ..
    1. bk316
      bk316 26 February 2020 19: 36 New
      -1
      Yeah, if he had returned the Constitution of 1936, it would have seemed harmonious ..

      For some reason, I am completely sure that you would be against it then. laughing
      Would come up with something ...
    2. depressant
      depressant 26 February 2020 19: 38 New
      22
      It’s already broken my brains to come up with versions of why such a rush and what it all means. Smoke screen? But for what? They say that Edro is being thrown out of wolf incarnations into a human being, the name changes, charter, composition. Having hidden fangs and claws, he goes to the elections of the 21st year under a new guise - they think, we will not recognize. Putin is changing the constitution without changing its anti-people nature. Werewolf edros and vampire oligarchs. Was the Hunter looming on the horizon?
      1. DymOk_v_dYmke
        DymOk_v_dYmke 26 February 2020 20: 02 New
        +8
        Quote: depressant
        Smoke screen? But for what?

        This smoke screen has a cadaverous and deceitful smell.
        Earlier, the working group reported that there would be no specification of amendments to the ballot in the referendum. The question will sound something like this: “Do you support changes to the Constitution of Russia?” There are two possible answers: yes and no.

        The Jesuits are resting.
        1. kjhg
          kjhg 26 February 2020 21: 26 New
          +1
          Quote: DymOk_v_dYmke
          The Jesuits are resting.

          But what if they rule?
      2. pl675
        pl675 26 February 2020 21: 00 New
        +9
        Was the Hunter looming on the horizon?

        rather a polar fox.
        Well, I see it, sorry.
      3. SARANCHA1976
        SARANCHA1976 26 February 2020 21: 04 New
        +4
        and according to new amendments to the president, NOBODY can remove anyone except the elections, but he can remove everyone. Our enthusiastic democrats for a couple of handouts with dual citizenship, etc. don't see anything
        1. AUL
          AUL 27 February 2020 08: 52 New
          +1
          Quote: SARANCHA1976
          and according to new presidential amendments, no one can remove except the election

          And the chairman of the State Council is generally no one except the one who appointed him! And no one limits his term of office. And the competence of the State Council is described very vaguely. It becomes clear who this place is being prepared for. Here, basically, because of this, I will vote against! Although there are several sensible amendments.
      4. smart ass
        smart ass 26 February 2020 21: 06 New
        +3
        Duck sort of like a pack ate all the hunters?
      5. lucul
        lucul 26 February 2020 22: 37 New
        0
        It’s already broken my brains to come up with versions of why such a rush and what it all means.

        The revenge was a success .....
    3. loki565
      loki565 26 February 2020 19: 40 New
      +9
      Well, one amendment had to be made a long time ago, it was the supremacy of the laws of the country over external ones, as in the USA, China, etc. .. And then all these politicized European courts are already tired, Russia is always to blame for them and it must always pay.
      1. Eugene-Eugene
        Eugene-Eugene 26 February 2020 20: 14 New
        +6
        and even an amendment would not hurt - everyone is accountable to the law.
        1. depressant
          depressant 26 February 2020 20: 35 New
          14
          And I am particularly interested in paragraph 10 - on the uniform principles of power in the territory of the Russian Federation. And then Udmurtia stipulated in its Constitution the right to self-determination - what is it anyway? Maybe it’s enough to play the possible independence of the regions and blackmail the central government, extorting extra handouts. Equal, so equal.
      2. Sky strike fighter
        Sky strike fighter 26 February 2020 20: 20 New
        +3
        After this vote, will Constitution Day be celebrated on April 22, not December 12? Do I understand correctly that this will be a new Constitution?
        1. Servisinzhener
          Servisinzhener 26 February 2020 20: 54 New
          +4
          I doubt it very much. Because amendments are made, and a new constitution is not adopted.
          1. Sky strike fighter
            Sky strike fighter 26 February 2020 23: 10 New
            0
            Quote: Servisinzhener
            I doubt it very much. Because amendments are made, and a new constitution is not adopted.

            When hundreds of amendments are introduced and a referendum is called, as in 1993, this is the new Constitution.
            1. Genry
              Genry 27 February 2020 01: 29 New
              0
              Quote: Sky Strike fighter
              When hundreds of amendments are introduced and a referendum is called, as in 1993, this is the new Constitution.

              The constitution will not be adopted on the day of the popular vote. Later.
      3. Slavenin82
        Slavenin82 26 February 2020 20: 30 New
        +4
        Hands and feet FOR !!! For the sake of this amendment, I will go and vote in favor.
      4. Campanella
        Campanella 26 February 2020 21: 46 New
        -1
        Of course, but the money is unlikely to reach the people.
      5. rruvim
        rruvim 26 February 2020 23: 28 New
        +3
        This is the only normal amendment. And behind her "back" is a bunch of incomprehensible texts.
  • iouris
    iouris 26 February 2020 19: 19 New
    0
    I didn’t ask - I was afraid.
  • Private89
    Private89 26 February 2020 20: 27 New
    +2
    Putin and his team are building the antipode of the USSR. I think Lenin would have looked at these figures closely and said nothing, would have called Comrade Dzerzhinsky so that his structure would deal with these counter-revolutionaries.
    1. Malyuta
      Malyuta 26 February 2020 22: 34 New
      -2
      Quote: Private 89
      Putin and his team are building the antipode of the USSR. I think Lenin would have looked at these figures closely and said nothing, would have called Comrade Dzerzhinsky so that his structure would deal with these counter-revolutionaries.

      To appoint a day for changing the bourgeois constitution, but in fact a constitutional coup with the introduction of the monarchy, is a cynical mockery of our Soviet socialist past.
  • New Year day
    New Year day 26 February 2020 20: 30 New
    -2
    Quote: Victor_B
    Did he ask Lenin's grandfather?

    but he does not ask, he uses everyone and everything
  • Paul Siebert
    Paul Siebert 26 February 2020 21: 18 New
    +9
    I watched the film "Union of Salvation" today.
    About how, at the end of 1825, the best representatives of the nobility and soldiers of the guard regiments went to die on the Senate Square in St. Petersburg.
    For the Constitution.
    He looked at the shining eyes of Pestel, Muravyov - the Apostle, Kakhovsky.
    These idealists knew - the Constitution, this is the future ...
    True, the soldiers in the ranks thought that the Constitution called the wife of the new Sovereign ...
    He switched the channel, got into the discussion of amendments to the new Constitution of the Russian Federation. Live.
    Displaced persons of the amendment council members. Empty eyes. Nonsense and petty pathos, interspersed with numbers of articles and paragraphs.
    I don’t want to highlight anyone. It's my pleasure.
    April 22, we will go to vote.
    Although the people now, after almost two hundred years, will not understand - what is all this ... What will it give us all ...
    Despite all the media resources, universal literacy, propaganda and own views.
    I’m going to vote too. According to his conscience. So it is necessary. What this will give us is time will tell.
    But to stand aside, grinning, somehow not in Russian ...
    1. SARANCHA1976
      SARANCHA1976 27 February 2020 14: 44 New
      0
      A film about burning eyes is certainly a strong argument, but if you get acquainted with the real situation and the actions of these "freedom fighters", then only a feeling of disgust will remain. For starters, I can say that out of all the ringleaders directly on the square there were only a few, the rest sat in the corners and waited for what turn things would take.
  • Russobel
    Russobel 26 February 2020 21: 53 New
    13
    Screaming headlines again.
    What does Lenin’s birthday have to do with it ?!
    If only to connect with something ...
    And Putin was born on October 7, the day of the librarian in Armenia ...
    What is not a holiday?
  • Campanella
    Campanella 26 February 2020 23: 33 New
    -3
    But he wanted to say something by this))) Only we are not fools! Maybe this is a signal that I am yours from the people and for the people)))
  • Theodore
    Theodore 26 February 2020 19: 13 New
    +3
    Oh, let the liberals howl! laughing
    1. Victor_B
      Victor_B 26 February 2020 19: 17 New
      -9
      Quote: Theodore
      Oh, let the liberals howl!

      Well, these are already howling!
      Just from "Baba Yaga against".
      Even if Putin introduces into the constitution a clause that every liberalist should be given 100 kilo rubles for his birthday, they will be against it!
      And on April 22 for them there will be another "day of mourning and remembrance" according to the Yeltsin constitution.
    2. Svarog
      Svarog 26 February 2020 19: 20 New
      15
      Quote: Theodore
      Oh, let the liberals howl! laughing

      Why should they howl, the liberals are changing the Constitution, but the people are howling ..
      1. Victor_B
        Victor_B 26 February 2020 19: 24 New
        -10
        Quote: Svarog
        liberals are changing the constitution,

        Well, what do you think, besides the liberals, there are also "useful liberals"?
        Maybe among them "not all are equally nasty"?
        1. paul3390
          paul3390 26 February 2020 19: 32 New
          +8
          besides liberals, there are also "useful liberals"
          Liberast - can only be useful as a scarecrow in the exposition of the Museum of the World Socialist Revolution ..
          1. Vladimir16
            Vladimir16 26 February 2020 19: 38 New
            -5
            Quote: Svarog
            Why should they howl, the liberals are changing the Constitution, but the people are howling ..

            Are you comfortable with the current one? And you are not a liberalist? Who you are? request
            Supporters of external control howled from all the cracks.
            1. Svarog
              Svarog 26 February 2020 19: 45 New
              21
              Quote: Vladimir16
              Quote: Svarog
              Why should they howl, the liberals are changing the Constitution, but the people are howling ..

              Are you comfortable with the current one? And you are not a liberalist? Who you are? request
              Supporters of external control howled from all the cracks.

              No, the current one doesn’t suit me .. but the guarantor’s life-long rule doesn’t suit me even more. Which, I must say, didn’t pay much attention to the Constitution, but draws it when it’s personally beneficial for him .. I’m not happy with the state council .. and the rest , all changes would be normal if the Constitution were respected ....
              1. DymOk_v_dYmke
                DymOk_v_dYmke 26 February 2020 20: 13 New
                +5
                Quote: Svarog
                No, the current one doesn’t suit me .. but the guarantor’s life-long rule doesn’t suit me even more. Which, I must say, didn’t pay much attention to the Constitution, but draws it when it’s personally beneficial for him .. I’m not happy with the state council .. and the rest , all changes would be normal if the Constitution were respected ....

                Also, the illegal procedure for making changes does not suit.
                1. Svarog
                  Svarog 26 February 2020 20: 36 New
                  14
                  Quote: DymOk_v_dYmke
                  Also, the illegal procedure for making changes does not suit.

                  In general, there is some kind of absurdity in all this view .. Let’s take the courts ... the president has repeatedly raised the question that our courts are biased, corrupt and the percentage of acquittals now tends to zero .. and against this background, there will be an amendment, judging by which ordinary citizens of the country will no longer be able to apply to the European Court and sue the state for damages .. It would be perfect justice, well, or close to that, to hell with a European court .. but it turns out that an ordinary citizen can not find protection anywhere. .
                  Regarding the supremacy of international law .. so it was under the USSR .. and no one wavered .. on this subject Platoshkin is very accessible and simply explains ..
                  In general, I now have full confidence that this movement, and with such acceleration .., indicates that the president or his entourage really need to make him Elbasy ..
                  So the illusionist show continues .. I want to twist the twist I want to deceive ..
                  1. DymOk_v_dYmke
                    DymOk_v_dYmke 26 February 2020 20: 44 New
                    -3
                    Quote: Svarog
                    In general, I now have full confidence that this movement, and with such acceleration .., indicates that the president or his entourage really need to make him Elbasy ..
                    So the illusionist show continues .. I want to twist the twist I want to deceive ..

                    Other versions do not work. hi
                    For it is better to sit than to sit.
                  2. Andrey VOV
                    Andrey VOV 26 February 2020 22: 01 New
                    +4
                    Enough for you to move Platoshkin, but what, are the courts in Europe ideal and not biased? Yes, they will always make decisions against Russia and the authorities
          2. New Year day
            New Year day 26 February 2020 20: 48 New
            +2
            Quote: paul3390
            Liberast - can only be useful as a scarecrow in the exposition of the Museum of the World Socialist Revolution ..

            reason dangerous! May attract!
        2. Cut Samshitov
          Cut Samshitov 26 February 2020 19: 34 New
          +4
          Quote: Victor_B
          Quote: Svarog
          liberals are changing the constitution,

          Well, what do you think, besides the liberals, there are also "useful liberals"?
          Maybe among them "not all are equally nasty"?
          Is it possible at least one full name of an "indecent liberal?"
          1. Victor_B
            Victor_B 26 February 2020 19: 34 New
            -7
            Quote: Sawing Boxwood
            Is it possible at least one full name of an "indecent liberal?"

            Putin and Shoigu arrange?
            1. Cut Samshitov
              Cut Samshitov 26 February 2020 19: 38 New
              -7
              And when did they call themselves liberals?
              1. Victor_B
                Victor_B 26 February 2020 19: 41 New
                +4
                Quote: Sawing Boxwood
                And when did they call themselves liberals?

                Always!
                Give examples of how they can still be called or called.
                Well, you can call conservatives and what will change?
                But the compound word lib-rust does not fit them.
                1. Cut Samshitov
                  Cut Samshitov 26 February 2020 19: 45 New
                  -8
                  On your "always!" you can also shout "never!" A link to a video or even an article. And so - a career Chekist liberal, sounds like a Jew - a reindeer herder. Theoretically possible, but practically ..
                  1. Victor_B
                    Victor_B 26 February 2020 19: 53 New
                    +4
                    Quote: Sawing Boxwood
                    And so - the personnel Chekist liberal, sounds like a Jew - a reindeer herder.

                    So Bush Jr., the former head of the CIA has never been a liberal?
                    Reindeer breeder?
                    1. Cut Samshitov
                      Cut Samshitov 26 February 2020 21: 52 New
                      -1
                      Quote: Victor_B
                      Quote: Sawing Boxwood
                      And so - the personnel Chekist liberal, sounds like a Jew - a reindeer herder.

                      So Bush Jr., the former head of the CIA has never been a liberal?
                      Reindeer breeder?

                      Yes. The Republican Party, from the liberals is much further than the Democrats Clinton and Obama.
                  2. pl675
                    pl675 26 February 2020 21: 18 New
                    -4
                    Quote: Cut Samshitov
                    On your "always!" you can also shout "never!" A link to a video or even an article. And so - a career Chekist liberal, sounds like a Jew - a reindeer herder. Theoretically possible, but practically ..


                    he (he) has everything possible and possible - practically he succeeded with a party card in his pocket, put candles in the church.
                    with the constitution, if he wiped his feet about it before that, what will he do now?
              2. New Year day
                New Year day 26 February 2020 20: 49 New
                +1
                Quote: Sawing Boxwood
                And when did they call themselves liberals?

          2. cost
            cost 26 February 2020 21: 03 New
            +4
            Quote: Cut Samshitov
            Is it possible at least one full name of an "indecent liberal?"

            Please - Ivan Vasilievich Grozny yes And it's not a joke. Inet to help you. In correspondence with Queen Elizabeth I of England, he proudly called himself a highly educated and highly cultured liberal, and openly boasted of his famous Liberia yes
        3. Malyuta
          Malyuta 26 February 2020 22: 36 New
          -3
          Quote: Victor_B
          Well, what do you think, besides the liberals, there are also “useful liberals?” Maybe among them “not all are equally rotten”?

          Of course everything and the most important liberal as well.
        4. Campanella
          Campanella 27 February 2020 00: 36 New
          -2
          All the convolutions have already braided the people of this mountain of liberals, pederasts and other helmsmen. There are no normal People anymore, there are cogs of verbiage theories behind which the Pharisees and power-hungry people hide.
      2. SSR
        SSR 26 February 2020 20: 55 New
        +6
        Quote: Svarog
        Quote: Theodore
        Oh, let the liberals howl! laughing

        Why should they howl, the liberals are changing the Constitution, but the people are howling ..

        I'm reading and don’t understand.
        1. No one has yet seen an option to vote.
        2. If even the Yes / No option, then who said that the majority cannot say No?
        3. Edro sagged strongly after the retirement and it is worth seeing what other party members will express on this initiative.
        4. If all factions support, then why blame the GDP if all power is that?))).
        5. Now you just need to carefully monitor what is happening and then make a decision.
        PS.
        And so, on what date you don’t poke, all one can be dug up something, even though the same is the last day of Pompeii.
        1. Malyuta
          Malyuta 26 February 2020 23: 31 New
          -1
          Quote: SSR
          I'm reading and don’t understand.

          Novel hi You are not the only one, everything is done just so that no one understands anything.
          1. Victor N
            Victor N 27 February 2020 12: 00 New
            -1
            You can clean the "understanding". Although this will not help many: they have not grown to such matters.
    3. Arlen
      Arlen 26 February 2020 19: 20 New
      14
      They always howl. Don’t feed them bread, just let them grow.
      1. Victor_B
        Victor_B 26 February 2020 20: 05 New
        -5
        Quote: Arlen
        They always howl. Don’t feed them bread, just let them grow.

        That's it!
        On ANY initiative of the authorities.
        The power did something - bad!
        I didn’t - it’s all the same bad!
        I asked them - it’s bad again, because they don’t know what they are doing!
        Americans should probably be asked to console our liberals.
        1. Svarog
          Svarog 26 February 2020 21: 02 New
          0
          Quote: Victor_B
          On ANY initiative of the authorities.
          The power did something - bad!

          The government did something .. but what exactly did she do? She is our beloved to work for myself .. I would work for the people, the population would grow .. and so for the fourth year in a row ..
          I asked them - it’s bad again, because they don’t know what they are doing!

          I forgot to ask about pension reform .. as well as about an increase in the rule of the president and the Duma ..
          Americans should probably be asked to console our liberals.

          I think they are advised .. your liberals ..
          1. Victor_B
            Victor_B 26 February 2020 21: 05 New
            -1
            Quote: Svarog
            your liberals ..

            Such liberals, however, are YOURS!
            I am generally for socialism. Without oligarchs and other abominations.
            1. Svarog
              Svarog 26 February 2020 21: 06 New
              11
              Quote: Victor_B
              I am generally for socialism.

              Well, I’m FOR socialism too, but according to your comments it’s hard to understand .. what are you upholding the socialist idea .. drinks hi
              1. Victor_B
                Victor_B 26 February 2020 21: 27 New
                -4
                It is just that socialism in Russia at this historical stage is impossible.
                And then in terms of liberal - liberalist we begin to look at personalities.
                Liberasty:
                - all grant-eaters (political, I have nothing against grants for science);
                - Well, still a fagot and .. growth are different concepts. The second on the road, for example, all the time;
                - and, to simplify the understanding, ALL of us, the so-called non-systemic opposition, who eat from the hands of Khodorkovsky and praise him;
                - simply hidden and overt internal enemies of Russia. Like Chubais, Gozman, etc.
                Liberals are more complicated here, because there is a thick layer today for your tomorrow for ours.
                Well, more patriots and "patriots". Also very different.
                And Putin is a statesman acting within the framework of liberalism.
                Not perfect. Especially in domestic politics.
                1. Svarog
                  Svarog 26 February 2020 21: 39 New
                  +9
                  I agree with everything except:
                  Socialism in Russia is simply impossible in this historical period

                  Very possible ... nothing is impossible .. 17-year-old Nikolai also seemed impossible ..
                  And Putin is a statesman acting within the framework of liberalism.

                  Putin is a liberal, which he has repeatedly stated .. Liberal Russia can’t be .. it is doomed .. Which, in fact, is proved by the figures and results of the liberals’ activity .. Of Putin’s major achievements, I can only single out Crimea ... I’ve tried everything else . And he has been in power for 20 years, and now, apparently, he has set his sights on life .. This fact doesn’t cause anything but sorrow, everything says that the population of Russia will decrease, science, industry, education, medicine and other vital spheres of life - degrade. Today's team has shown its complete failure for 20 years is a very long time ...
                  1. Victor_B
                    Victor_B 26 February 2020 21: 50 New
                    +4
                    Quote: Svarog
                    Of the serious achievements of Putin, I can only single out Crimea.

                    Well, and a tiny detail - Russia in 2000 and Russia in 2020, apparently, "in spite of Putin" and thanks to the "will of the people", fat is a completely different country.
                    Stalin took over the country with a plow and surrendered with nuclear missiles.
                    Putin accepted just took a piece of the Soviet Union with a completely collapsed economy and separatism, and now it is another country. Quite another.
                    I understand that the time of Medvedev’s rule is prettier for you?
                    It seems to me that if Putin hadn’t been Prime Minister under him, Medved would pile / pile / collapse / surrender even more!
                    1. Svarog
                      Svarog 26 February 2020 22: 04 New
                      -3
                      Russia in 2000 and Russia in 2020, apparently "in spite of Putin" and thanks to the "will of the people", fat is a completely different country.

                      Well, what is it different? The facade - yes, they renewed .. and the foundation is still the same ... Courts, as there were "none", so everything remained .. as all and sundry were stealing, and they are stealing .. nepotism corruption is unprecedented scale .. (though now it is safe they steal those who are in the cooperative ..) medicine, bought equipment, again, they warmed up their hands on this ... but to the point, you won't get to a narrow specialist .. yes, nothing fundamentally has changed in everything .. The price of oil was sky-high, so it seemed that life is getting better .. and riali .. demography clearly speaks about them ..
                      I understand that the time of Medvedev’s rule is prettier for you?
                      It seems to me that if Putin hadn’t been Prime Minister under him, Medved would pile / pile / collapse / surrender even more!

                      Rather you don't understand laughing Medvedev and Putin, one team ..
                      1. Victor_B
                        Victor_B 26 February 2020 22: 09 New
                        -1
                        Quote: Svarog
                        Rather, you do not understand Medvedev and Putin, one team ..

                        The team is one, and the commander has changed.
                        Apparently, you didn’t have to work in production when you changed the director and returned from the post of deputy.
                        I have seen. And the difference is VERY big!
          2. Andrey VOV
            Andrey VOV 26 February 2020 22: 03 New
            -7
            Are you swollen from hunger? Putin comes to you daily and takes the last one? Good whining, a peasant is not worth it
    4. Eugene-Eugene
      Eugene-Eugene 26 February 2020 20: 13 New
      -3
      you're already at war, child of a coronavirus.
    5. New Year day
      New Year day 26 February 2020 20: 32 New
      +4
      Quote: Theodore
      Oh, let the liberals howl!

      That's for sure! Peskov confirms
  • Mavrikiy
    Mavrikiy 26 February 2020 19: 17 New
    +5
    On the day of the 150th anniversary of the birth of Lenin: Putin approved the date of the referendum on the Constitution
    We approve Putin’s approval, and what remains. request On the other hand, symbolic. repeat
    1. Cut Samshitov
      Cut Samshitov 26 February 2020 19: 37 New
      +1
      Only one paragraph on the abolition of priority of international (read - Washington) legislation is enough to participate in a referendum.
      1. New Year day
        New Year day 26 February 2020 20: 33 New
        +4
        Quote: Sawing Boxwood
        to participate in the referendum.

        in the survey! Pension reform referendum where?
        1. Andrey VOV
          Andrey VOV 26 February 2020 22: 04 New
          -12
          Are you a pensioner? No, there are hands on the legs? There is, so why are you whining then? Not a man, but a whiner
          1. New Year day
            New Year day 27 February 2020 17: 53 New
            +2
            Quote: Andrey VOV
            Are you a senior citizen? No

            Yes. In the operating room since 1980. Impossible to live on pension, I work
            Quote: Andrey VOV
            no, are there legs arms?

            have hypertension III. Few? 2 coming to the cardiopulmonary resuscitation from the operating room is also not enough?
            Quote: Andrey VOV
            not a man, but a whiner

            not for you to judge.
        2. Genry
          Genry 27 February 2020 01: 44 New
          -4
          Quote: Silvestr
          Pension reform referendum where?

          Collect signatures and you will have a referendum.
          Under the amendment of the Constitution, he collected the signatures of NOD.
    2. Eugene-Eugene
      Eugene-Eugene 26 February 2020 20: 13 New
      -4
      approve yourself, no one has delegated you, especially from the Supreme Council.
  • Tank jacket
    Tank jacket 26 February 2020 19: 20 New
    +2
    An interesting numerical measure of the event 22, 2020 ... 22; 22.
    Strong managerial maneuver.
    1. New Year day
      New Year day 26 February 2020 20: 36 New
      -1
      Quote: Tank jacket
      Strong managerial maneuver.

      maybe a mystery of numbers? or believe in otherworldly forces? laughing
      1. Malyuta
        Malyuta 26 February 2020 22: 42 New
        -1
        Quote: Silvestr
        maybe a mystery of numbers? or believe in otherworldly forces?

        Is the entrance to Shambhala? belay
  • DMB 75
    DMB 75 26 February 2020 19: 20 New
    13
    that there will be no specification of amendments to the ballot in the referendum. The question will sound something like this: "Do you support changes to the Constitution of Russia?"

    Variants of answer:
    1. Yes, not against change
    2. No, not against the changes.
    Of course, people are not opposed to revising the results of the Great Patriotic War or indexing pensions. And what else will be on this list? You can fix anything under the Constitution. Return Stalin's socially oriented, or 77 years.
    1. Alexga
      Alexga 26 February 2020 19: 27 New
      +6
      Once again "yes, yes, no, yes"!
      1. DymOk_v_dYmke
        DymOk_v_dYmke 26 February 2020 20: 20 New
        +4
        Quote: AlexGa
        Once again "yes, yes, no, yes"!

        And the rapid destruction of ballots.
      2. Malyuta
        Malyuta 26 February 2020 22: 43 New
        0
        Quote: AlexGa
        Once again "yes, yes, no, yes"!

        I voted NO, NO, YES, NO!
    2. bk316
      bk316 26 February 2020 19: 35 New
      +8
      And what else will be in this list complete?

      And you read and write an article. We are pleased to discuss ....
    3. Campanella
      Campanella 26 February 2020 22: 17 New
      0
      Yes, the president was covered for the New Year and it started! "Come on, herself, herself ...." (Station, for two)
      Actually, the president stirs up, mixes and shakes.
      The working group, in my opinion, decided to mock, at least something worthwhile to contribute, as they say, if you can’t avoid violence, you need to relax.
      Be that as it may, everything will return as a boomerang if the authorities solve their problems.
    4. SARANCHA1976
      SARANCHA1976 27 February 2020 14: 49 New
      -1
      More on Thursdays to wear panties on his head
  • faterdom
    faterdom 26 February 2020 19: 34 New
    +7
    For the Emperor Constantine and his wife - the Constitution!
    1. Eugene-Eugene
      Eugene-Eugene 26 February 2020 20: 11 New
      +1
      then did not pass ...
  • Thrifty
    Thrifty 26 February 2020 19: 34 New
    +5
    You can pass a million new laws, and amendments to the constitution of the country, but when will the power itself learn to begin to implement its own laws that were adopted earlier? ??
    1. Nikolay87
      Nikolay87 26 February 2020 19: 56 New
      +4
      Quote: Thrifty
      You can pass a million new laws and amendments to the constitution of the country, but when will the power itself learn to begin to implement its own laws that were adopted earlier? ??

      You see what’s the matter, in our country officials themselves will not do anything, they need to be forced to do their job. And the only way to do it officially is to oblige it legally.
      About pensions, I would also add "prohibit the freezing of pensions" and "annual indexation not lower than inflation"But somehow it was all lowered and these officials will get out again. yes
      1. New Year day
        New Year day 26 February 2020 20: 37 New
        +8
        Quote: Nikolay87
        And the only way to do it officially is to oblige it legally

        and now officials are not working in the legal field of the Russian Federation? laughing
        1. Nikolay87
          Nikolay87 26 February 2020 21: 27 New
          +3
          Quote: Silvestr
          Quote: Nikolay87
          And the only way to do it officially is to oblige it legally

          and now officials are not working in the legal field of the Russian Federation? laughing

          I mean, if this is not spelled out in their duties, in one way or another, then they will not lift a finger.
        2. Campanella
          Campanella 26 February 2020 22: 11 New
          +2
          Officials work in their field, they are afraid only of the president and his inner circle, and they do not care about the people.
          A people of the type elected a president, and he rules in the interests of the people and rules ... It is ridiculous indeed.
      2. Campanella
        Campanella 26 February 2020 22: 20 New
        +4
        Bullshit, tomorrow Putin will come out and say that the situation does not allow him to pay a minimum wage, there is no gold reserve! And all swim geese by.
  • lelik613
    lelik613 26 February 2020 19: 36 New
    +4
    A sapper is a self-taught ... "- What is the difference between an installation and a performance? If, for example, you gave a shit to a person at the door, and then rang the bell, this is an installation. But if you first called the person, and when he left the apartment, then you sat down in front of him and gave a shit, - this is already a performance. "
  • fa2998
    fa2998 26 February 2020 19: 42 New
    +6
    Quote: DMB 75
    indexation of pensions.

    Well, about pensions there is a separate law, there is no need to overload the Constitution. Yes and little this amendment will give pensioners, after all, the authorities consider inflation, such and indexation. Although the prices are sky high!
    And yet, probably in the world we will be the only country where the guaranteed earnings are reflected in the Constitution, pr.150-160 $, Hurray !!! Only employers will get out, because now many pay 5-6 thousand. hi
    1. carstorm 11
      carstorm 11 26 February 2020 19: 51 New
      +2
      No one pays 5-6 thousand. Why write these nonsense? The Labor Code of the Russian Federation clearly defines that a salary less than the living wage is not allowed. Reduced wages are a problem not only for the employee, but also for the employer, because according to Article 133 of the Labor Code, the salary cannot be lower than the officially fixed value of the living wage. I have never met anyone who is not so friendly with his head that this would violate.
      1. polar fox
        polar fox 26 February 2020 20: 48 New
        +2
        Quote: carstorm 11
        No one pays 5-6 thousand. Why write these nonsense?

        the niece works at the post office 7,5 tyrov.
        1. Servisinzhener
          Servisinzhener 26 February 2020 20: 56 New
          +4
          Full time?
          1. polar fox
            polar fox 26 February 2020 20: 57 New
            -1
            Quote: Servisinzhener
            Full time?

            Yes.
            1. Andrey VOV
              Andrey VOV 26 February 2020 22: 06 New
              +6
              Write a complaint to the labor inspectorate and prosecutor's office
              1. Nikolai Grek
                Nikolai Grek 27 February 2020 00: 14 New
                0
                Quote: Andrey VOV
                Write a complaint to the labor inspectorate and prosecutor's office

                what for?? it's better to grind here !! wink laughing
        2. carstorm 11
          carstorm 11 26 February 2020 22: 21 New
          +4
          people are also robbed on the street. necessarily a complaint. it’s their local superiors twisting something. and most likely refer to the minimum wage. if he says nothing, it’s very vain.
      2. Malyuta
        Malyuta 26 February 2020 22: 46 New
        0
        Quote: carstorm 11
        I have never met anyone who is not so friendly with his head that this would violate.

        small request Worker work part-time.
        1. carstorm 11
          carstorm 11 26 February 2020 22: 52 New
          +6
          this is generally another article with real terms. people are forced to work full time for half the rate.
      3. SARANCHA1976
        SARANCHA1976 27 February 2020 14: 52 New
        +1
        Yes, for such a living wage it is already necessary to plant at this minimum
  • Lord of the Sith
    Lord of the Sith 26 February 2020 20: 00 New
    +7
    To vote like that, you need to know what specific amendments have been made, otherwise there is little less sense in voting than no.
    1. DymOk_v_dYmke
      DymOk_v_dYmke 26 February 2020 22: 29 New
      +3
      Quote: Lord of the Sith
      To vote like that, you need to know what specific amendments have been made, otherwise there is little less sense in voting than no.

      To know a little. There should be a referendum on each amendment separately.
  • flicker
    flicker 26 February 2020 20: 01 New
    -4
    On the day of the 150th anniversary of the birth of Lenin: Putin approved the date of the referendum on the Constitution
    Finally, these amendments have long been obvious.
    In the current constitution: "The norm of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, establishing priority of international law over national law ..."
    Amendments propose to consolidate in Russia priority of Russian laws over international
    Against the amendments, only rabid Russophobia.
    Z.Y. And the date was chosen successfully!
    1. Paranoid50
      Paranoid50 26 February 2020 20: 58 New
      -4
      Quote: flicker
      The amendments propose to fix in Russian territory the priority of Russian laws over international

      There are enough useful items. At least the one that Mashkov introduced is a ban even on any negotiations regarding the territorial integrity of Russia. That is, nobody has any territories - whatever would be in their thoughts. And here's a funny moment: as in the past two years the local swamp has been rushing about, all this petty bourgeois organized crime group, howling about everything, give the islands-islands to damned yap ... fellow And what we see now: the very same organisms we build are going into failure. Aw, that's the fawn. laughing And this is only one point. In short, as one character used to say: our people are wonderful,
      only people, here ... yeah.
      yes
      1. Overlock
        Overlock 26 February 2020 21: 18 New
        +5
        Quote: Paranoid50
        Aw, that's the fawn.

        Are you talking about the Daman and Norwegian Sea?
        Quote: Paranoid50
        the ban even to conduct any negotiations regarding the territorial integrity of Russia.

        who did all this? laughing
        1. Paranoid50
          Paranoid50 26 February 2020 22: 30 New
          +1
          Quote: Overlock
          Daman and Norwegian Sea?

          laughing laughing laughing Not tired of procrastinating this bullshit? But, after all, everything is in the public domain, all the details have been chewed for a long time, but no, not in the horses of oats. yes This uncle to this day is cursed by one proud northern country:
          Quote: Overlock
          who did all this?

          And then I’ll answer: you don’t even need to leave the resource to find out, yeah: the local host, to which the voices were whispered (again) about some mythical "deals". For almost two years, a form of hysteria took place here from scratch, fueled by unknown local "authors" (well, where are they without "flock"?), Who, I'm sure, themselves quietly sneered at all this action. The result - zilch, everything went into steam. And during this time, the notorious islands were pumped up to the fool with various types of weapons and deployed units of the RF Armed Forces. And everything is hand over and over ... wassat Hey-bo, this was the last time something was explained to someone. That's it, Sabbath, let them chew their snot further.
      2. flicker
        flicker 26 February 2020 21: 41 New
        +3
        There are enough useful items. At least the one that Mashkov introduced is a ban even on any negotiations regarding the territorial integrity of Russia.
        That's right, enough. And territorial integrity - yes, it also knocks out a topic for speculation from the "supposedly" patriotic part.
        And what we see now: the very same organisms we build are going into failure.
        good exactly what "organisms" yes
    2. Malyuta
      Malyuta 26 February 2020 22: 54 New
      -1
      Quote: flicker
      Against the amendments, only rabid Russophobia.

      First you need to change the judicial system, and no ECHR will help you anymore and you will be able to safely forget International Human Rights!
      General Assembly,

      proclaims this Universal Declaration of Human Rights as a task that all peoples and states should strive to achieve, so that every person and every organ of society, constantly bearing in mind the present Declaration, seeks, through education and education, to promote respect for these rights and freedoms and to ensure , through national and international progressive measures, universal and effective recognition and implementation of them both among the peoples of the Member States of the Organization, and among the peoples of the territories, find those under their jurisdiction.

      Article 1

      All people are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and must act towards each other in a spirit of brotherhood.

      Article 2

      Everyone should have all the rights and freedoms proclaimed by this Declaration, without any distinction, somehow in relation to race, color, sex, language, religion, political or other beliefs, national or social origin, property, estate or other position.

      In addition, no distinction should be made on the basis of the political, legal or international status of the country or territory to which the person belongs, regardless of whether the territory is independent, trust, non-self-governing or otherwise limited in its sovereignty.

      Article 3

      Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.

      Article 4

      No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade are prohibited in all their forms.

      Article 5

      No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

      Article 6

      Every person, no matter where he is, has the right to recognition of his legal personality.

      Article 7

      All people are equal before the law and are entitled, without distinction, to equal protection of the law. All people have the right to equal protection against any discrimination that violates this Declaration, and against any incitement to such discrimination.

      Article 8

      Everyone has the right to effective restoration of rights by the competent national courts in cases of violation of his fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law.

      Article 9

      No one may be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile.

      Article 10

      Every person, in order to determine his rights and obligations and to establish the validity of the criminal charge against him, has the right, on the basis of full equality, to have his case considered publicly and in compliance with all requirements of justice by an independent and impartial court.

      Article 11

      1. Every person accused of committing a crime has the right to be presumed innocent until his guilt is established by law through a public trial, in which he is provided with all the possibilities for defense.

      2. No one may be convicted of a crime on the basis of the commission of an act or inaction, which at the time of their commission did not constitute a crime under national laws or international law. Nor can a heavier punishment be imposed than the one that could have been applied at the time when the crime was committed.

      Article 12

      No one may be subjected to arbitrary interference with his personal and family life, arbitrary attacks on the inviolability of his home, the secrecy of his correspondence or his honor and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or such encroachment.

      Article 13

      1. Everyone has the right to move freely and choose his place of residence within each state.

      2. Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country.

      Article 14

      1. Everyone has the right to seek asylum from persecution in other countries and to use this shelter.

      2. This right cannot be exercised in the case of persecution, in fact based on the commission of a non-political crime, or an act contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.

      Article 15

      1. Everyone has the right to citizenship.

      2. No one may be arbitrarily deprived of his citizenship or the right to change his citizenship.

      Article 16

      1. Men and women of full age have the right, without any restrictions on the basis of race, nationality or religion, to marry and found their own family. They enjoy the same rights with respect to marriage, during a state of marriage and during its dissolution.

      2. A marriage may be concluded only with the free and full consent of both parties to the marriage.

      3. The family is the natural and fundamental unit of society and has the right to protection from society and the state.
      1. Malyuta
        Malyuta 26 February 2020 22: 59 New
        0
        Article 17

        1. Everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association with others.

        2. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property.

        Article 18

        Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change one’s religion or belief and freedom to practice one’s religion or belief, individually or in community with others, publicly or privately, in the teaching, worship, and performance of religious and ritualistic rites.

        Article 19

        Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to adhere freely to one's beliefs and freedom to seek, receive and disseminate information and ideas by any means and regardless of state borders.

        Article 20

        1. Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association.

        2. No one may be forced to join any association.

        Article 21

        1. Everyone has the right to take part in the government of his country, directly or through freely chosen representatives.

        2. Everyone has the right to equal access to public service in his country.

        3. The will of the people should be the basis of government power; this will must find expression in periodic and un rigged elections, which must be held with universal and equal suffrage by secret ballot or other equivalent forms that ensure freedom of vote.

        Article 22

        Each person, as a member of society, has the right to social security and to exercise the rights necessary in order to maintain his dignity and for the free development of his personality in the economic, social and cultural fields through national efforts and international cooperation and in accordance with the structure and resources of each state .

        Article 23

        1. Everyone has the right to work, to free choice of work, to fair and favorable working conditions, and to protection against unemployment.

        2. Everyone, without any discrimination, has the right to equal pay for equal work.

        3. Every worker has the right to a fair and satisfactory remuneration, ensuring a decent living for himself and his family, and supplemented, if necessary, by other means of social security.

        4. Everyone has the right to create trade unions and join trade unions to protect their interests.

        Article 24

        Everyone has the right to rest and leisure, including the right to a reasonable restriction on working hours and to paid periodic leave.

        Article 25

        1. Everyone has the right to such a standard of living, including food, clothing, housing, medical care and the necessary social services that are necessary to maintain the health and well-being of himself and his family, and the right to provision in case of unemployment, illness, disability, widowhood, the onset of old age or another case of loss of livelihood due to circumstances beyond its control.

        2. Motherhood and infancy give the right to special care and assistance. All children born in or out of wedlock should enjoy the same social protection.

        Article 26

        1. Everyone has the right to education. Education should be free, at least with regard to primary and general education. Primary education must be compulsory. Technical and vocational education should be universally accessible, and higher education should be equally accessible to all based on the abilities of each.

        2. Education should be aimed at the full development of the human personality and at increasing respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. Education should promote mutual understanding, tolerance and friendship among all peoples, racial and religious groups, and should contribute to United Nations peacekeeping.

        3. Parents have a priority right in choosing the type of education for their young children.

        Article 27

        1. Everyone has the right to freely participate in the cultural life of society, enjoy art, participate in scientific progress and enjoy its benefits.

        2. Everyone has the right to protect his moral and material interests arising from scientific, literary or artistic works of which he is the author.

        Article 28

        Everyone has the right to a social and international order in which the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration can be fully realized.

        Article 29

        1. Everyone has duties to a society in which the free and full development of his personality is possible.

        2. In the exercise of their rights and freedoms, each person shall be subject only to such restrictions as are established by law solely to ensure due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others and to satisfy the fair requirements of morality, public order and general welfare in a democratic society.

        3. The exercise of these rights and freedoms shall in no case be contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.

        Article 30

        Nothing in this Declaration shall be construed as granting to any state, group of persons or individuals the right to engage in any activity or perform actions aimed at the destruction of the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration.
      2. flicker
        flicker 26 February 2020 23: 08 New
        +5
        You would still have the whole site: "https://studopedia.ru/10_226459_generalnaya-assambleya.html
        copied.
        Can you express your own thought?
        1. Malyuta
          Malyuta 26 February 2020 23: 24 New
          -1
          Quote: flicker
          Can you express your own thought?

          My native language is Russian, I have outlined everything, but if you don’t know how to read or see poorly, this is your sadness.
          1. flicker
            flicker 26 February 2020 23: 51 New
            +4
            Your thought.
            And not a declaration of the text of the General Assembly on human rights and freedoms.
            I do not think that you are its author.
          2. brat07
            brat07 27 February 2020 02: 39 New
            +2
            And now, please:
            Article 12:

            No one may be arbitrarily interfered with in his personal and family
            life, arbitrary attacks on the inviolability of his home, the secrecy of his correspondence, or on his honor and reputation. Everyone has the right to be protected by the law from such interference or such encroachment. "
            Didn’t remind you ???
            Let me remind you - juvenile justice, which is "flourishing" in double color in many European countries.
            And how does it "fit" with this article?
          3. kot28.ru
            kot28.ru 27 February 2020 04: 32 New
            +1
            And how many articles are violated by the states, interfering in the internal affairs of other states, often with the use of armed formations? They spit on all this, why then what does not work should be higher than the Russian legislation? Or are the opponents of the amendment more frightened by others? dual citizenship, a ban on the rejection of territories, a bummer on a variety of claims-squeaks towards Russia?
  • The comment was deleted.
  • Petrol cutter
    Petrol cutter 26 February 2020 20: 04 New
    +2
    Interesting thought! I just returned from work.
    I have two questions.
    So the date was set, or did the parties exchange opinions?
    Where can I find the final list of changes so to speak?
    Once the vote is a list.
    1. Eugene-Eugene
      Eugene-Eugene 26 February 2020 20: 10 New
      0
      everything will be fine!
      1. Petrol cutter
        Petrol cutter 26 February 2020 20: 31 New
        11
        And suddenly, will not be? And I, at that time, went out to smoke ...
        That time, it came out, the Soviet Union collapsed. I personally have no right to make a mistake ... repeat
        I have to be sober to put an end to the newsletter!
  • Sergey Averchenkov
    Sergey Averchenkov 26 February 2020 20: 17 New
    +5
    I am for Lenin, I don’t know who is there for whom, but I am for Lenin. There are even no questions.
    1. Andrey VOV
      Andrey VOV 26 February 2020 22: 08 New
      -7
      Mummy fan?
      1. Sergey Averchenkov
        Sergey Averchenkov 27 February 2020 10: 08 New
        +3
        A fan of the USSR, then Lenin. What can I do, I was raised, grew up in the USSR. I understand you are against, well, shoot everyone like me.
        1. Andrey VOV
          Andrey VOV 27 February 2020 10: 17 New
          -3
          I, too, was born in the USSR, but the way Lenin conceived the USSR, it came to us, Stalin, by the way, was against just such a union state, and in general, what still serves us was done under Stalin, and Lenin didn’t moreover, given that since the age of 20, he was physically unable to fully lead
          1. Sergey Averchenkov
            Sergey Averchenkov 27 February 2020 10: 30 New
            +2
            I agree that from the 20th. But you understand, without Lenin there would have been no Stalin. It would not be, it would not be stupid. And so on down to us, what a bad habit to shit on your past?
            1. Andrey VOV
              Andrey VOV 27 February 2020 10: 33 New
              -3
              it can be an infinitely long story from a series that there used to be a chicken or an egg, I remain of my opinion, you are of your own
              1. Sergey Averchenkov
                Sergey Averchenkov 27 February 2020 10: 35 New
                +1
                On this and go. Sincerely.
  • Radikal
    Radikal 26 February 2020 20: 23 New
    +4
    Quote: figvam
    Quote: Askold Matveev
    I will go. I’ll go in principle and vote against the adoption of the amendments.

    In your opinion, let officials remain dual citizenship, and the laws of NATO countries will be higher than ours? And the constitution is unchanged - Yeltsin, pah.

    And do you know that the amendment proposed by actor Mashkov to ban the alienation of part of the territory of the Russian Federation in favor of any states will not be included in the list of changes, and what ridiculous reason did the Guarantor give in order not to include it? winked
    1. Svarog
      Svarog 26 February 2020 20: 38 New
      +5
      Quote: Radikal
      And do you know that the amendment proposed by actor Mashkov to ban the alienation of part of the territory of the Russian Federation in favor of any states will not be included in the list of changes, and what ridiculous reason did the Guarantor give in order not to include it?

      No, it is very curious why the guarantor rejected such an important amendment?
      1. depressant
        depressant 26 February 2020 21: 41 New
        +3
        Stunned! Really really not included?!? And why then vote there.
    2. Andrey VOV
      Andrey VOV 26 February 2020 22: 09 New
      -1
      It's stuffing, it's gonna be made, don't spread the lie
    3. brat07
      brat07 27 February 2020 03: 50 New
      -1
      Quote: Radikal
      Quote: figvam
      Quote: Askold Matveev
      I will go. I’ll go in principle and vote against the adoption of the amendments.

      In your opinion, let officials remain dual citizenship, and the laws of NATO countries will be higher than ours? And the constitution is unchanged - Yeltsin, pah.

      And do you know that the amendment proposed by actor Mashkov to ban the alienation of part of the territory of the Russian Federation in favor of any states will not be included in the list of changes, and what ridiculous reason did the Guarantor give in order not to include it? winked

      I apologize, but the link will be about the rejection of the amendment of the actor Mashkov on the prohibition of exclusion will be ???
      For some reason I did not find.
      And this is already "annoying".
  • The comment was deleted.
  • The comment was deleted.
    1. Lord of the Sith
      Lord of the Sith 26 February 2020 20: 48 New
      -2
      Something you carry a blizzard, Sylvester in the Dining Room.
      1. New Year day
        New Year day 26 February 2020 20: 51 New
        +3
        Quote: Lord of the Sith
        Something you are carrying a blizzard

        you do not keep up with the likes of you!
        laughing
        1. Lord of the Sith
          Lord of the Sith 26 February 2020 20: 54 New
          -4
          You like? Who is this? In more detail, please, I'm curious what a person will say (or maybe a bot, or a troll half-time), who am I, not knowing anything about me))
        2. Lord of the Sith
          Lord of the Sith 26 February 2020 21: 49 New
          -2
          What, zero attention, a pound of contempt?))
          I actually asked a question.
          Do not burst only from a sense of self-importance))
    2. Loess
      Loess 26 February 2020 21: 22 New
      -1
      Quote: Silvestr
      and it’s April 22 that appoints a vote for itself! Indescribable hypocrisy!

      What you, however, write nonsense. But the most interesting thing is that you yourself understand this, but
      Quote: Silvestr
      Indescribable hypocrisy!
    3. Andrey VOV
      Andrey VOV 26 February 2020 22: 10 New
      -5
      Everything was worked out on the shelves why exactly the 22nd date, if your mental abilities do not allow this to be understood, then I sincerely regret you
    4. carstorm 11
      carstorm 11 27 February 2020 00: 56 New
      -1
      when you already understand that April 22 is for 80 percent of the country's inhabitants just April 22 ...
  • Professor Preobrazhensky
    Professor Preobrazhensky 26 February 2020 20: 34 New
    +5
    For those who are happy that an article will appear on the impossibility of tearing off the territories of the Russian Federation, I want to ask:
    - Have you read the current constitution?
    - Isn't there an article on territorial integrity?
    - If you don’t see such an article there, then on the basis of what did we restore constitutional order to the first Chechen company?
    - Did this clause of the constitution prevent each of the mz presidents acting at that time (Medvedev and Putin) from giving away our territories?
    - And on the basis of what then harsh sentences are handed down for attempts to change the integrity of the state?
    The Internet will help you both about the constitution and about the article on the integrity of the state and about the first Chechen and about the given land.
    1. Overlock
      Overlock 26 February 2020 21: 20 New
      +3
      Quote: Professor Preobrazhensky
      Have you read the current constitution?
      - Isn't there an article on territorial integrity?
      - If you don’t see such an article there, then on the basis of what did we restore constitutional order to the first Chechen company?
      - Did this clause of the constitution prevent each of the mz presidents acting at that time (Medvedev and Putin) from giving away our territories?
      - And on the basis of what then harsh sentences are handed down for attempts to change the integrity of the state?

      the question is deaf: they are always "for" and it does not matter for what reason. The main thing is to please the authorities
  • GUSAR
    GUSAR 26 February 2020 20: 48 New
    +1
    And what kind of referendum are you talking about? After all, they said that it would not be a referendum, but a poll, yesterday they wrote that it would even be possible to vote on "State Services" ... Oh, how ... But in general, I remember once, relatively long ago and recently at the same time, there was something it looks like 1993, "Yes, yes, no, yes," remember? But there was a referendum. And by the way, what will the vote be about?
    1. Petrol cutter
      Petrol cutter 26 February 2020 20: 53 New
      +6
      For approval of amendments to the constitution of the Russian Federation. As far as I understand. Vote must be assumed by the list.
      Where is it not clear to you?
      1. GUSAR
        GUSAR 26 February 2020 21: 35 New
        -3
        It is not clear what specific amendments you can announce the list?
    2. spirit
      spirit 26 February 2020 21: 11 New
      0
      Yeah, you see, the Great Supreme Ruler loves very much that everything would be legitimate and official, so we will vote to approve what I have already approved)) but in general it reminds me of something laughing
  • vladimirvn
    vladimirvn 26 February 2020 20: 55 New
    +8
    Voting in a single package for changing the Constitution is a mockery and a spit in the face. So do not respect your people! I have no words!
  • fa2998
    fa2998 26 February 2020 20: 55 New
    +4
    Quote: carstorm 11
    No one pays 5-6 thousand. Why write these nonsense? The Labor Code of the Russian Federation clearly defines that a salary less than the living wage is not allowed. Reduced wages are a problem not only for the employee, but also for the employer, because according to Article 133 of the Labor Code, the salary cannot be lower than the officially fixed value of the living wage. I have never met anyone who is not so friendly with his head that this would violate.

    Where do you live? In Moscow? In the outback, and even if it’s a day \ 2-3. The guard receives 5-7 thousand. A spouse says the hospital recently had a salary of a nurse-4600. At the janitor, the cleaners in the housing office, 5-7 thousand are a constant fluid. City beggar, subsidized. Come, do not be a dreamer. hi
    1. carstorm 11
      carstorm 11 27 February 2020 01: 02 New
      -2
      Firstly, I'm talking about the salary of a normal 8 hour day. she always goes the benchmark. the watchman and stuff is from another opera. secondly, if someone does not follow the laws for their own benefit, this is a crime. and these organizations need to write statements and complaints. What does the region have to do with it? TK is one for all.
  • parusnik
    parusnik 26 February 2020 21: 00 New
    +4
    Earlier, the working group reported that there would be no specification of amendments to the ballot in the referendum. The question will sound something like this: "Do you support changes to the Constitution of Russia?"
    ...Those. April 23, we can wake up under the constitutional monarchy ... laughing
    1. Overlock
      Overlock 26 February 2020 21: 21 New
      -2
      Quote: parusnik
      Those. April 23, we can wake up under the constitutional monarchy ...

      have any doubts? Churov! Aw!
  • Professor Preobrazhensky
    Professor Preobrazhensky 26 February 2020 21: 05 New
    +6
    For those who advocate the primacy of our legislation over international:
    - We both adhered to international law and will live in accordance with international laws. Otherwise, we will become an outcast country. Well, you can not live with neighboring countries based on their laws. It’s like in a strange monastery ....
    - Let's say our Petrov and Bashirov were convicted in absentia in London. We didn’t give them and we won’t give them back.
    - Or does someone think that with the adoption of this amendment we will return the convict Bout, who was convicted by the states? We will return our other convicts around the world?
    - Or will we ignore the decision of the European court in the Yukos case? Then they will arrest our property, as they once arrested Kruzinshtern, an art exhibition, an airliner.
    - Or will our Gazprom not now pay penalties to Ukraine by decision of an international court? Then Ukraine will block our pipe for transit, as a warning.
    - But when the European Court of Human Rights admits that you were illegally convicted in Russia for allegedly participating in a rally and decides to pay you 10.000 euros in compensation for each year of the colony, then this amendment will work. They solder another term at home, for violating the constitution and being shot as a repeat offender (the last joke, although who knows).
    1. tank64rus
      tank64rus 27 February 2020 10: 48 New
      +1
      An outcast country from whom apparently from the liberals then I will vote three times. Since we ceased to be an outcast country, we have lost the entire economy, millions of people, millions of kilometers of territory, armed forces. The country is ruled by a comprador bourgeoisie in alliance with crime. So it’s better to live a country without this and I don’t care how good uncles from the wild West treat us, though for you this is the luminous city of Washington on a hill.
  • Warrior MorePhoto
    Warrior MorePhoto 26 February 2020 21: 05 New
    +5
    Quote: Lord of the Sith
    To vote like that, you need to know what specific amendments have been made, otherwise there is little less sense in voting than no.


    All amendments are dust in the eyes, everything is already defined and clear. What prevents a kick in the ass with dual citizenship? This is generally how ??? Take an oath of allegiance to another country ... often these are NATO countries or even our potential enemies - America, England. Stalin would have really hung all of them publicly on Red Square for the treason of the purest water!
    Pensions increase ... so they will increase by 100 rubles, and the ruble will collapse by 10 rubles, that’s all the math, and maybe increase by 10 rubles.
    All questions go to all segments of the population, for example, grandmothers For retirement, opponents of rear-wheel drive and family For mom and dad, not parent1 and 2, for those who are tired of snickering EdRo, For against dual citizenship, etc., and + to 1. Increase rating 2 The most important thing is to consolidate the state council, which will decide everything with our permanent decisions. Any decision in the future, even the president, can be rejected by the State Council, as well as the approval of the president himself will be confirmed by them, i.e. he who needs them will be.
  • samarin1969
    samarin1969 26 February 2020 21: 10 New
    +2
    Why change the Constitution? There is one problem with it - it is not observed. Not respected, ranging from "honor and dignity" in public transport. Well, Chapters 1 and 2 are observed quite formally by "sovereign people".

    ps In the XNUMXth century, one "enlightened ruler" gathered the "Legislated Commission" - it ended in war and revolt. ... Only Crimea has already been attached "in advance." laughing
  • Chess knight
    Chess knight 26 February 2020 21: 15 New
    +2
    Quote: Benzorez
    Interesting thought! I just returned from work.
    I have two questions.
    So the date was set, or did the parties exchange opinions?
    Where can I find the final list of changes so to speak?
    Once the vote is a list.


    "What kind of socks do you want to wear, red or blue?" It is so convenient with children, because they wonder which ones, but in fact they do not understand what they will have to wear them. So here, it seems like everything is correct, only not a word about the State Council, everyone is puzzled, whether to write God into the Constitution or not, about pensions, well, which of the pensioners does not want to be raised? So vote FOR, but in fact, a body is being created more important than the president, where it will be clear who will be !?
  • Whisper
    Whisper 26 February 2020 21: 17 New
    0
    And the full list of changes will probably be announced on April 21st?
  • Campanella
    Campanella 26 February 2020 21: 21 New
    +7
    The working group unanimously states that 97% of the people supported the constitutional amendment. Apparently I got to 3%, no one asked me.
    The people are the bearers of power, and the basic law is ruled by a group of people, and the people only have to approve their choice. Somehow this is not constitutional. The role of the people in the development and adoption of the constitution should be more significant and procedurally spelled out.
  • 29dest
    29dest 26 February 2020 21: 21 New
    +4
    I'm going to go and vote against the constitutional coup. And now the uryakryakals and pensioners have slipped another handout in the form of a ban on citizenship and the priority of local law over international law against the background of the creation of a body for the eternal rule of Elbasy, and they will happily run to vote not on points but for the adoption of the entire criminal package of amendments. Without even thinking that the powers of the "State Council" and the method of its formation have not yet been determined by federal law. Without thinking, how many notorious personalities with a residence permit and permanent residence are in the committee on changing the constitution ...
  • Chess knight
    Chess knight 26 February 2020 21: 25 New
    -1
    Quote: 29dest
    I'm going to go and vote against the constitutional coup. And now the uryakryakals and pensioners have slipped another handout in the form of a ban on citizenship and the priority of local law over international law against the background of the creation of a body for the eternal rule of Elbasy, and they will happily run to vote not on points but for the adoption of the entire criminal package of amendments. Without even thinking that the powers of the "State Council" and the method of its formation have not yet been determined by federal law. Without thinking, how many notorious personalities with a residence permit and permanent residence are in the committee on changing the constitution ...


    If we talk about the priority of local over international, then why is our Crimea?) Then it is not ours) the Ukrainian constitution has a clause which states that no territories can be transferred or separated, international society is against ... but Crimea is ours!)
  • The comment was deleted.
  • Karabin
    Karabin 26 February 2020 21: 41 New
    10
    Earlier, the working group reported that there would be no specification of amendments to the ballot in the referendum. The question will sound something like this: “Do you support changes to the Constitution of Russia?” There are two possible answers: yes and no.

    Those in power have started playing with the basic law with one single purpose - to retain power for life. The supreme body of power will be the State Council, headed by Putin for life. Dear Russians will not even have to bother going to the "elections"; the "best people of the country" will form the supreme body of power without the participation of the electorate. All other amendments are patriotic chaff, on which once again offshore Putin and Co. will lead gullible citizens. You, who hang labels of liberals and Russophobes on those who say "no" to amendments, do you really think that the consolidated priority of Russian legislation over international ones will somehow change the situation? Or will the prescribed ban on dual citizenship shake the ranks of high-ranking officials and deputies? I am begging you. Under the current constitution, no international law is higher than the Russian one, until consent is signed to enforce it. Signed by the way by the authorities and the president as well. Don't like paying the bills of the Hague court? So tear up the relevant international treaty and don't pay. What to do with international obligations under the new amendment? Either to refuse obligations, or to adjust the already internal law to the obligations. Knowing about the great love of Putin and Co. for dear friends and partners, the desire to be with them at the same table, to be in the same organizations with them, I will not be at all surprised at the redrawing of the necessary laws for these tasks. So why change the awl for soap, and even with a surcharge? The same is with dual-triple citizenship. A barrier for such people can be easily installed within the framework of current legislation. There would be desire and will. But no. We need a circus with a nationwide expression of will. Why circus? Yes, because all high-profile citizens will remain in their places, because they are pure lambs and have no green cards or residence permits. They swear by mom.
    So, dear so-called patriots, at least worry about the amendments, there’s only one result - they’ll fuck you again.
    PS By the way, for the adherents of "The king is good - the boyars are rubbish" a new stage begins. After the adoption of amendments to the constitution in bulk (of which I am 146% sure) and the formation of the state council, the president can be added to the bad boyars over time. wink
    1. remal
      remal 26 February 2020 22: 40 New
      -4
      Don't like paying the bills of the Hague court? So break the relevant international treaty and don’t pay. What to do with international obligations under the new amendment? Either refuse obligations, or customize an internal law to obligations. Knowing the great love of Putin and Co. for dear friends and partners, the desire to be at the same table with them, to be in the same organizations with them, I will not be surprised at all at redrawing the necessary laws for these tasks. So why change the awl for soap, and even with a surcharge?


      Play something. There, all the cheese is boron because of the 50 billion euros that the privatizers sued from in court against Russia. Well, they took it to the referendum - "Pay?" and options "yes", "no", "don’t know". And then let the lawyers in our country and abroad think about how to formalize all this, leave the OSCE, or cancel the results of privatization, this is already a matter of technology. I am in favor not to pay on this occasion, and not because of money, but out of principle, but at the same time, I want the European Court for Citizens to continue working as far as possible. And for the union agreement with Belarus to work, regardless of the opinion of the constitutional court.

      As for the extension of powers. Well, it’s such a vote in most countries of Africa, it happens in the BSSSR, it used to be in Latin America, now it seems that they are already moving away from that. In principle, I’m on the drum, how will the vote go there.

      An important question about boundaries,
      Vladimir Putin specified that it is necessary to find formulations that "would not prevent the Foreign Ministry from working on demarcation of borders in the future."
      I’m not lazy, I’m going to vote against such formulations.
  • Professor Preobrazhensky
    Professor Preobrazhensky 26 February 2020 21: 46 New
    +4
    In order to vote for constitutional amendments, it is not necessary to visit a polling station or vote through a public services portal.
    It will be enough on April 22 to turn on the TV on any federal channel and just blink.
    That’s about 146% of votes will be counted for changing the constitution. lol
  • Radikal
    Radikal 26 February 2020 21: 49 New
    +3
    Quote: Svarog
    Quote: Radikal
    And do you know that the amendment proposed by actor Mashkov to ban the alienation of part of the territory of the Russian Federation in favor of any states will not be included in the list of changes, and what ridiculous reason did the Guarantor give in order not to include it?

    No, it is very curious why the guarantor rejected such an important amendment?

    And the reason, or rather, the reason he cited is funny - supposedly this amendment will make it difficult to resolve issues related to the demarcation of border sections, but he didn’t say which ones. It is strange that since 1918, when the border troops were created, such problems did not arise, in addition, you can always develop a mechanism that does not hinder the amendment on the ban on alienation of the territory - any border guard officer knows that! soldier
    1. DPN
      DPN 26 February 2020 23: 06 New
      +2
      That's right, until the guarantor is responsible for the territory with his head, all this will be from the evil one.
      The main goal is not JURISDICTION for any act. Example: Gorbachev, Yeltsin that they received for the collapse? Government service and a monument.
  • Professor Preobrazhensky
    Professor Preobrazhensky 26 February 2020 21: 51 New
    +6
    ARE YOU NOT AGAINST PACKAGE AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION?
    - yeah I do not mind
    - no I do not mind
  • sergo1914
    sergo1914 26 February 2020 21: 52 New
    +2
    Would the new Constitution not receive the adjective "Lenin"?
  • Radikal
    Radikal 26 February 2020 21: 53 New
    +3
    Quote: Sheptun
    And the full list of changes will probably be announced on April 21st?

    On the 23rd and 24th, when the results are summed up / subtotal and it is announced that 99,9 percent of the population voted "for". We will be surprised when "the entire list is announced"! sad
  • fif21
    fif21 26 February 2020 21: 53 New
    +5
    The guarantor wants guarantees. And in a democratic society, everyone is equal before the law. I am against changes to the Constitution. Medvedev was also the President of the Russian Federation. ! And what else they want to change in the Constitution, they do not specifically say. They propose voting in the dark for some changes. hi
  • Vasily Kritov
    Vasily Kritov 26 February 2020 21: 56 New
    -3
    Trolling of the West and liberal-tuned at the highest level)))
  • Chess knight
    Chess knight 26 February 2020 21: 59 New
    +3
    Quote: fif21
    The guarantor wants guarantees. And in a democratic society, everyone is equal before the law. I am against changes to the Constitution. Medvedev was also the President of the Russian Federation. ! And what else they want to change in the Constitution, they do not specifically say. They propose voting in the dark for some changes. hi


    Moreover, even logically, if there are 2-3 changes, I should have the right to speak out Against what I am and For what.
    Every person has and can have something For and Something Against.
  • Fishery
    Fishery 26 February 2020 22: 12 New
    -1
    150 from the day of Lenin’s birth) this is very important now, I think like other referenda will be held almost unanimously))))))))))) that’s why the GDP will be crowned
  • 7,62h54
    7,62h54 26 February 2020 22: 29 New
    -1
    Before the referendum, it would be necessary to hammer the Mausoleum with plywood. And there May 9 is not far.
  • 75 Sergey
    75 Sergey 26 February 2020 22: 32 New
    +1
    This Constitution was written by a drunken EBN, dictated by the US State Department.
  • faterdom
    faterdom 26 February 2020 22: 41 New
    -1
    Quote: Paranoid50
    There are enough useful items. At least the one that Mashkov introduced is a ban even on any negotiations regarding the territorial integrity of Russia.

    And what, is it separately necessary to stipulate? Or what other eccentricities? After all, President Yeltsin also used to soak his pants in the presence of meeting foreigners ... Also include a ban in the Constitution? Ah, yes, it’s still necessary to ban the parliament from thrashing tanks, otherwise it happens with us, because it’s not forbidden = allowed!
  • rruvim
    rruvim 26 February 2020 22: 53 New
    -1
    The dismissed Surkov hinted that amendments to this very Constitution will nullify the presidential term (i.e. the Foreman will be able again and again). No matter how the presidential administration refutes this. I do not know if these amendments are useful for our Russian reality? It’s not obvious to me. Therefore, obviously I’ll go to vote and express firmly - NO !!!
  • DPN
    DPN 26 February 2020 22: 55 New
    +2
    Let's go lay flowers to V.I. Lenin, and then to the referendum.
  • ultra
    ultra 26 February 2020 22: 57 New
    +5
    Quote: dsk
    There will be no "gift" from me - I will not vote.

    This is your gift.
  • syndicalist
    syndicalist 26 February 2020 22: 57 New
    0
    Quote: loki565
    Well, one amendment had to be made a long time ago, this is the supremacy of the laws of the country over external ones, as in the USA, China, etc.

    Freak! There are no "external laws". There are international agreements signed by the president on behalf of the state. Don't sign unprofitable contracts and there will be no "dominance".
  • rruvim
    rruvim 26 February 2020 23: 03 New
    -4
    There is a moment with which the Kremlin brothers are blackmailing us: "The supremacy of the basic law of the Russian Federation over international law." They say we will not accept the amendments "together", then we will not accept this amendment either. This means for the "shoals" of GAZPROM, the return of the Crimea, the alleged downing of a Malaysian Boeing, and even for the famine, etc. etc. will have to pay for the decisions of international courts in accordance with our Yeltsin Constitution of 1993. And if we accept "together", then we will agree to the State Council, and more, to zero the presidential terms.
    1. remal
      remal 26 February 2020 23: 41 New
      0
      Gazprom is already paying according to court decisions. The rest is all theory. Practice now in the Yukos case is 50 billion euros. According to this precedent, it is important to give a turn from the gate to distinguish between civil affairs, economic issues and politics.
      1. rruvim
        rruvim 27 February 2020 00: 00 New
        0
        Well, that would be just this point: "The supremacy of the basic law of the Russian Federation over the international one" without any other amendments. It would be possible to vote the next day with all the people and en masse ...
        1. remal
          remal 27 February 2020 00: 20 New
          -1
          To vote on this court case, one must open people's eyes to how and by whom the privatization was organized. Who got the property. How the measure of Nefteyugansk was killed in order not to pay taxes, etc., etc. And just to vote with bows for all the good, it makes no sense.
    2. Roman070280
      Roman070280 27 February 2020 12: 17 New
      -1
      This is called - under the fool ..
  • Rostislav
    Rostislav 26 February 2020 23: 08 New
    +1
    Rave. How can I vote without seeing a specific text? And when a few corrections. I agree with 2, let's say, but I don’t agree with 2 others. What `s next?
    Such a statement of the issue of pure water is a profanation of the very idea of ​​a referendum.
    1. fk7777777
      fk7777777 26 February 2020 23: 24 New
      -2
      That's what it is about, no specifics, just like in ancient Egypt, yes or no, that's all ...