Russian military bases abroad: where and why are they needed


The question of creating new Russian military bases outside the country is being discussed more and more actively. But does our state really need a large-scale expansion of its military presence in different parts of the world?


Military bases abroad are needed not for any aggressive actions against other states, but to strengthen the country's defense capabilities, to designate and protect its geopolitical and economic interests. For example, in the United States this is how they explain the presence of hundreds of their bases and military facilities almost all over the world. It is no coincidence that most countries claiming the status of not even superpowers, but simply strong and self-sufficient states, prefer to have at least one or two military bases outside the country.

The world leader in the number of foreign military bases is the United States, but France, Great Britain, Germany, China, Japan and even India, Turkey and Pakistan have their military facilities outside the state border. Naturally, Russia also has such objects.

Before the collapse of the USSR, there were much more military bases abroad, but now our country has bases in Abkhazia, Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Transnistria, Syria, Tajikistan and South Ossetia. As you can see, the only country outside the post-Soviet space where there are Russian military facilities is Syria. It houses the naval base in Tartus and the air base in Hmeimim. Military facilities in Syria make it possible not only to support the Russian contingent, which helps the government forces of the country to fight terrorists, but also to control the situation in the Middle East and the Eastern Mediterranean.

However, bases in Syria alone outside the borders of the former USSR are few, especially if you compare Russia with the United States and take into account the difficult global political situation. Therefore, in recent years, they are increasingly talking about the prospects of creating Russian military bases in other countries of the far abroad. Among the possible options are Egypt, Libya, Sudan, Somalia, Yemen, and even the Central African Republic and Mozambique. In addition, the possibility of restoring military bases in Vietnam and Cuba is not ruled out. But while all this is more at the level of rumors.

Now Russia needs to control the situation not only in Syria or in the post-Soviet space, but also in the main strategic directions, and this is the Atlantic, the Indian Ocean and the coast of East Africa, and the Asia-Pacific region. If we talk about the regions of the planet, it is advisable for Russia to acquire military bases at least on the northern and eastern coasts of Africa, in Southeast Asia, and also on the Atlantic coast - in Latin America.

But not every country will be ready to deploy Russian military facilities on its territory. Therefore, the list of potential candidates includes either Russia-friendly countries, which already have difficult relations with the United States, or developing countries of the Third World, who may be interested in locating the base in terms of financing, and to maintain security within their states. The first category of countries includes Cuba, Syria, the second - Sudan, Somalia, Mozambique, the Central African Republic and several other states.

By the way, in addition to Cuba, Russian military bases could well be deployed in Venezuela. This would make it possible not only to get closer to the borders of the United States, but also to support Nicolas Maduro, protecting the latter from the overthrow and establishment of a pro-American regime. In Southeast Asia, a Russian naval base would provide greater opportunities for the Pacific fleet in the same South China Sea. The most profitable and reasonable option in this case is the revival of the Soviet base of Camran. Negotiations about this are underway, but the information is classified and it is not yet clear whether our military will reappear in Vietnam.

In any case, it is obvious that now the deployment of new military bases abroad is becoming not only a matter of national prestige, but also a means of ensuring national security. Without a Russian military presence in the form of bases in the Atlantic, in the Pacific Ocean, in the Indian Ocean, we cannot adequately confront the United States far from the borders of our country. In addition, Russian military bases are another tool in the fight against international terrorism or the same piracy (which is especially true for the northeast coast of the African continent). Another question: will modern Russia draw military bases outside the country - from Cuba to Vietnam? Will there be a sufficient number of ships and military-technical resources in general to provide these bases?
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

58 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. CommanderDIVA 24 February 2020 14: 10 New
    • 7
    • 2
    +5
    To analyze where and for what purpose our facilities were in the times of the USSR, taking into account new threats to national security and our economic and political interests, to study the need for these facilities at present, that's all
    1. lucul 24 February 2020 15: 07 New
      • 5
      • 11
      -6
      To analyze where and for what purpose our objects were during the Soviet era,

      What is there to analyze? Suez Canal, Gibraltar, Strait of Hormuz, Falklands and other strategic places. Well, or at least close to them .....
      1. CommanderDIVA 24 February 2020 16: 01 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Exactly what is there to analyze and why, judging by your logic, you need to deploy a base and deploy it next to the Panama Canal, well, you should not forget about Hawaii
        1. lucul 24 February 2020 16: 05 New
          • 2
          • 5
          -3
          judging by your logic, you need to deploy a base and next to the Panama Canal,

          Not so what? Crawl right into the cemetery? )))
          I understand that it is not easy - but we must strive for this)))
      2. antivirus 24 February 2020 19: 18 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Another question: will modern Russia draw military bases outside the country - from Cuba to Vietnam? Will there be a sufficient number of ships and military-technical resources in general to provide these bases?

        IN 10-15 YEARS, THE MAIN THING WILL BE - ANTARCTICA AND ITS TRAFFIC. The fleet is needed for presence everywhere in the world, and not against AUG. and Arctic experience should help us
        1. bayard 24 February 2020 21: 39 New
          • 2
          • 1
          +1
          To deploy naval bases, you must first have a Navy. Moreover, the Fleet of the Open Sea, that is, the Ocean. With the appropriate fleet of ships of the ocean and distant marine zones.
          If shipbuilding programs still move forward and the 22350 \ 22350M series still does, and will go at a normal (good) pace, we can talk about such things seriously. It is necessary to think, plan, and negotiate now, but it is better to refrain from making loud statements, because so far everything is shaky and there is no confidence in the timing.
          And the main problem is the engines.
          GEM.
          If this year the first frigate with the domestic power plant is successfully launched, if the sea trials are successful, and Rybinsk will be able to rhythmically supply its CVD products in the future, if finally diesel units with a capacity of 10 - 000 l / s appear ... plans for the deployment of overseas naval bases can be built and discussed seriously.
          In the West Atlantic, the base is best established in Venezuela (our ships will be more comfortable there), and in Cuba - the MTO base, the RT reconnaissance center and the over-the-horizon Container-type radars ... you can also use Voronezh-M, the VKS base for covering everything this economy and jump to our far-offers. But just for the jump (to the far), and the base itself in Venezuela is more comfortable there.
          Relations with Algeria are already good.
          In Libya in the future - preferably, from there the whole of Europe will be under a slipper.
          In Kamrani - a good idea, but only if we have a normal fleet in the Pacific Ocean. We would have to cover Primorye, Kamchatka, Sakhalin and the Kuril ridge there as it should. For starters, aviation and coastal complexes, AWACS, PLO and patrol aircraft.
          That would take Nikolaev (with the whole of New Russia) and build the Fleet normally, at a good pace.
          Take Zaporozhye and build normally BTA aircraft (An-124, An-70, An-142), Be-200, Il-112, Il-114, helicopters at a normal pace with normal engines.
          Dnepropetrovsk and Yuzhmash should be included in the Sarmat cooperation. And not only .
          Kharkiv .
          Clinton didn’t say from scratch that without Ukraine Russia would not become an Empire ... including cooperation in the military-industrial complex, it was meant ... Like the vast majority of the Russian population in it.
          One willful decision, and a whole block of problems will be solved in one fell swoop.
          And a new quality condition.
          But for this we need WILL.
          1. antivirus 25 February 2020 11: 18 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            But for this, WILL
            - This is a rejection of money and recognition as a “country with a market economy” —30 ​​years down the drain.
            the fleet and then the base — only after its perimeter — I agree, BUT ONLY AFTER ITS FAPES AND ROADS + VET AND W \ PL PLAYERS OF D \ SADIKI.
            such a long (20-30 years) chain of goal-setting-tasks-problems-development programs cannot even be set now.
            And the rejection of the division of Antarctica in the 2040s? how much will the Russian Federation lose in 2050-70 from such "there were no funds and forces in 2020" for a presence in the Southern Ocean?
          2. Alexey RA 26 February 2020 14: 20 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: bayard
            That would take Nikolaev (with the whole of New Russia) and build the Fleet normally, at a good pace.

            What for? No, really - why exactly Nikolaev for building a fleet? belay
            For some reason everyone thinks that in Nikolaev castle with sleeping beauty a canned plant since 1991 with the same canned personnel. So - this is nothing. The iron of the plant has been used since the times of the USSR, knocking out a resource, or just standing, rusting and pulling away. The staff is still more complicated - since 1991 the factory has not built large ships. In fact, the plant needs to be built and equipped again.
            Isn’t it better to do the same within Russia? Reconstruction and expansion of Sevmash will cost less than restoration and staffing of Stapel 0.
            1. bayard 27 February 2020 06: 14 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              I'm talking about "Zorya-Mashproekt". It is difficult for our defense industry to be given new competencies, just as the new GEM for 22350 Rybinskaya will show itself ... In the summer they should lower it, and there it will be visible on the chassis (quality). And the number (pace) is in question - besides frigates, there are also “super frigates” on the horizon, and there are destroyers (certainly gas turbine), UDC, light-medium aircraft carriers (40 - 000 tons and certainly gas turbine) ... I survive for Rybinsk, whether it will pull ... And nikolayevets would pull. And together, and in cooperation even that is more fun - export would be more than enough.
              Zaporozhye - aircraft engines (An-124, An-142, An-70 would be launched into the series, IL-112, IL-114, helicopter engines in the required quantity and quality - would not have to be smuggled, Be-200, SSD-100 )
              Dnepropetrovsk - Yuzhmash, metallurgy, mechanical engineering, science.
              Kharkov - uh (!) Of which there is only ...
              As Comrade Bismarck said: “Russians always return for their assets” ... it is time to return - for their own, for themselves, their own. yes
  2. The leader of the Redskins 24 February 2020 14: 10 New
    • 14
    • 4
    +10
    Bases are needed. This is an indisputable fact. But the author is also right in the matter of financial content. Like in the movie "so that our desires coincide with our capabilities" ...
    1. bayard 24 February 2020 21: 52 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: Leader of the Redskins
      But the author is also right in the matter of financial content.

      And here it’s not a sin to take advantage of the enemy’s experience.
      Who maintains its base in Japan, Germany and a number of other customers?
      CUSTOMERS themselves.
      For they are either MANDATORY (like Germany and Japan), or interested in protection.
      So it was with us in the same Kamrani.
      But in order to be interested in us - like in the roof, we need to regularly demonstrate such ability.
      Strong - respected.
      Fair - trusted.
      Successful - envy.
      We will gain (return to ourselves) such qualities - the floor of the World will open its doors to us under the bases.
  3. Sapsan136 24 February 2020 14: 14 New
    • 21
    • 1
    +20
    Before talking about the need or absence of the need for military bases abroad, Russia needs to build a new, full-fledged fleet. What is today is barely enough for coastal defense and the decommissioning of old ships is faster than the construction of new ones, which leads to a reduction in the already not big fleet ..
  4. Lekz 24 February 2020 14: 22 New
    • 8
    • 1
    +7
    Most likely, we do not need bases for maintaining a geopolitical image and solving purely military tasks, but for reducing, namely lowering, the operational costs of maintaining the combat effectiveness of naval forces. Here, first of all, it is interesting to organize bases in Cuba / Venezuela (Atlantic region), Camran (Pacific region) and Mozambique (Indian Ocean region). Along the way, it is possible to solve the tasks of military presence and intelligence (primarily in Cuba).
    1. Moreno 24 February 2020 19: 47 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Very wisely!
  5. Crystal of Truth 24 February 2020 14: 25 New
    • 17
    • 11
    +6
    What to place on those bases?
    Ukraine then profucuded at hand, what can we say about the "far frontiers" ..
    1. carstorm 11 24 February 2020 14: 33 New
      • 6
      • 7
      -1
      What do you mean by profuca in the topic of military bases? how the presence of military bases could solve the problem with the Ukrainian Maidan? war or what?
      1. KCA
        KCA 24 February 2020 15: 06 New
        • 4
        • 1
        +3
        The military base was just a huge base, 75 troops with a possible temporary increase in the garrison to 000 troops
      2. Nyrobsky 24 February 2020 17: 11 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: Crystal of Truth
        What to place on those bases?
        Ukraine then profucuded at hand, what can we say about the "far frontiers" ..

        Quote: carstorm 11
        What do you mean by profuca in the topic of military bases? how the presence of military bases could solve the problem with the Ukrainian Maidan? war or what?
        Under the agreement with Ukraine, the Russian Federation could place a contingent of up to 25 thousand pieces at a Russian naval base in Crimea. At the time of the Maidan, there were 18 thousand. Our Crimea.
      3. Crystal of Truth 24 February 2020 17: 46 New
        • 5
        • 5
        0
        That means that we can’t keep the closest neighbors in our orbit .. What will the base in Mozambique help you with
        1. carstorm 11 24 February 2020 17: 51 New
          • 2
          • 3
          -1
          will not help you. MO will help. it’s not their business to keep someone in their orbit.
    2. tihonmarine 24 February 2020 14: 48 New
      • 5
      • 2
      +3
      Quote: Crystal of Truth
      Ukraine then profucuded at hand, what can we say about the "far frontiers".

      I wonder how profuci and who? But here are the words of a senior uncle in August 1990, probably many remember when he uttered a textbook phrase: "Take as much sovereignty as you can swallow." And everyone began to swallow, until it vomited.
      1. Crystal of Truth 24 February 2020 15: 47 New
        • 4
        • 6
        -2
        Yeah .. "Lenin planted the bomb"
      2. Talgat 148 25 February 2020 04: 07 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Starting from the Russian Federation!
        Bialowieza Forest did not forget !?
  6. Mavrikiy 24 February 2020 14: 26 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    this is small, especially if you compare Russia with the United States and take into account the difficult global political situation
    What is going to compare, honey? request Base is a support tool. Question: support of what. We have goals for the United States, and therefore different means. repeat If necessary, for our safety, then Cuba, Venezuela, and Vietnam ....... somehow later.
    1. KCA
      KCA 24 February 2020 15: 09 New
      • 3
      • 2
      +1
      The USA is constantly hustling in Southeast Asia, although there is restless there, the base in Vietnam is necessary, at least for hydrographic and other scientific reconnaissance ships
  7. Amateur 24 February 2020 14: 42 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    On October 17, 2001, at a private meeting in the Ministry of Defense, the president announced the closure of the Russian military base in Lourdes. It was officially said that the equipment located there is outdated and does not allow collecting information in the required amount. In addition, the annual rental of the intelligence center costs Moscow $ 200 million annually. Anatoly Kvashnin, who occupied the chair of the Chief of the General Staff at that time, immediately supported the chief: we will build 20 reconnaissance satellites with the money saved and we will know the same about the Americans.
    It was nonsense, because we did not pay any “living” money to the Cubans.

    In May 1999, an agreement was signed on the establishment of a Chinese radio interception center on the island.

    Open - close. Open again. Until the next attack of pacifism?
  8. Sergey39 24 February 2020 14: 49 New
    • 6
    • 2
    +4
    Once we got rid of foreign bases in the late 80s. As a result, the war came to our home. Contain their urgent need.
    1. tihonmarine 24 February 2020 15: 52 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: Sergey39
      Once we got rid of foreign bases in the late 80s. As a result, the war came to our home.

      Gone is to say the least, but this place was immediately taken by Uncle Sam and his comrades. And this is serious, no matter what you say.
    2. Nyrobsky 24 February 2020 17: 51 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: Sergey39
      Once we got rid of foreign bases in the late 80s. As a result, the war came to our home. Contain their urgent need.

      To open a base is half the battle; it still needs to be stably provided with everything necessary, and in case of a threat, provide real and sufficient military support, without which these bases are just a target. Logistics alone in the event of evacuation measures for medical reasons (removal of the wounded) is worth it. Today, there is not a single friendly country surrounded by our base in Transnistria, the supply and rotation of military personnel is mainly carried out by air, and in the event of hostilities, these countries can close the airspace for our aircraft and then you will have to actually cut through the land corridor through the same Ukraine. So it can be said at arm's length. Mattresses in this regard are more mobile, in view of the fact that they do not need to pull out the contingent from any base to their mainland, but rather transfer it to neighboring bases, of which they have been hit all over the world like a flea dog. Putting in as many bases, we cannot purely because of economic inexpediency.
      Three years ago, during a briefing, reporters asked Putin whether Russia was going to restore its bases in Cuba and Vietnam, to which he replied, “Why? Who will we get and so.”
  9. knn54 24 February 2020 14: 52 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    In connection with the withdrawal of the Yankees from the agreement on the INF Treaty, bases are primarily needed in Cuba, Venezuela, Nicaragua.
    1. Grits 24 February 2020 15: 13 New
      • 2
      • 4
      -2
      Quote: knn54
      In connection with the withdrawal of the Yankees from the agreement on the INF Treaty, bases are primarily needed in Cuba, Venezuela, Nicaragua.

      I do not think that these countries will be very pleased with our bases. Since they are well aware that after this all sorts of sanctions and color revolutions will immediately begin. dancing taught everyone to keep in fear.
    2. tihonmarine 24 February 2020 16: 04 New
      • 0
      • 6
      -6
      Quote: knn54
      primarily needed in Cuba, Venezuela, Nicaragua.

      In Cuba, under Khrushchev, they tried, which led to the Caribbean crisis. The world was on the verge of war. Glory to God, the mind triumphed.
  10. rudolff 24 February 2020 15: 02 New
    • 18
    • 0
    +18
    Putin closed the base in Lourdes, Cuba, and he forgave Cuban debt of over $ 30 billion. By exchanging debt for a base rental, we could sit in Cuba until we ourselves were tired. Putin did the same with Vietnam. They left Kamrani and forgave the debt. Conversely, on the same scale, they will no longer let us in.
    1. tihonmarine 24 February 2020 16: 07 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Quote: rudolff
      Conversely, on the same scale, they will no longer let us in.

      Well, that’s the whole story. What to talk about now.
      1. rudolff 24 February 2020 16: 38 New
        • 7
        • 0
        +7
        If only PMTO is modest. In general, they did something stupid with these bases. Could at least connect the withdrawal from Cuba with the closure of the base in Guantanamo, a beautiful gesture would be. Camrano was generally chic. Both for the Navy and for aviation.
  11. Nikolai Petrov 24 February 2020 15: 04 New
    • 13
    • 0
    +13
    The only question for backfill: And who eliminated the bases in Vietnam and Cuba in order to bother the “partners”? And where did the railway complex go?
  12. 7,62h54 24 February 2020 15: 07 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    But it seems to me that defense is primarily affected by the self-sufficiency of production, human reserves and human qualities of officials.
    1. fk7777777 24 February 2020 15: 16 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Well, you’re just like a Chinese philosopher ... To the emperor’s question, what to do ?, they say, you have to change yourself and never asked him more questions.
  13. cniza 24 February 2020 15: 11 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    but also a means of ensuring national security.


    Here is the answer to this question.
  14. fk7777777 24 February 2020 15: 14 New
    • 1
    • 4
    -3
    It is constitutional to consolidate Japan as part of the Republic of Tatarstan, and that Genghis Khan was there, well, everything means all the Tatars ...
  15. Alexga 24 February 2020 15: 18 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    Before you place the base somewhere, you need to determine why it is needed and what functions it will perform. And most importantly, we need the political will of the state to carry out these tasks.
    Crystal of Truth (T.V.) Today, 14:25 p.m.
    +2
    What to place on those bases?
    Ukraine then profucuded at hand, what can we say about the "far frontiers" ..

    But the Crystal of Truth is very right. See for yourself, Ukraine at all its state bodies screaming about the "aggressor." And this aggressor, instead of putting this screamer in an uncomfortable position, just continues to trade with him, yes, there are some sanctions. But in general??? And it is on its borders. But how will things be at far borders? How is it in Syria? Israel does everything it wants and is not afraid that Caliber or C 400 will fly to them. And Syria is a military ally.
  16. ABM
    ABM 24 February 2020 15: 31 New
    • 9
    • 1
    +8
    make one base in Penza! very hard for people! average salary 15 thousand
    1. Petrol cutter 24 February 2020 16: 53 New
      • 3
      • 1
      +2
      Preferably American? The whole city will go to work on it ...
      1. Petrol cutter 24 February 2020 18: 37 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Average in the city ... That is, there are people who have seventy, there are people who have thirty, and there are people who have twelve. We have a similar situation.
        What to do? The only answer is we went to Moscow. Peter. There is all the money brother! ..
        As an option, you can start a revolution. Only no one knows how it can end.
        1. Petrol cutter 24 February 2020 19: 09 New
          • 2
          • 1
          +1
          No, except for jokes. I will not take such responsibility.
          In terms of the organization of the revolution.
          I am not Lenin. And mnu education is not enough.
          Although if at all without options ... Then, do not complain.
          We will fiercely restore order. By all available methods. The word democracy, forget it.
          You can’t be me as a foreman .. You understand ...
          But, in the first place, it is precisely by such methods that the collective is deduced. hi
  17. rocket757 24 February 2020 15: 33 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Need, no need .... question / goal for many years.
    Difficult, costly and for a long time.
  18. fider 24 February 2020 15: 56 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    All this is nonsense. Those who can afford it financially and who can protect them in the military plan have bases abroad, and then use them when necessary.
  19. Mathafaka 24 February 2020 16: 03 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    For new bases, ships of the 1st rank and supply vessels are needed. But they are not.
  20. Petrol cutter 24 February 2020 16: 49 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    The fact that a naval base is needed does not cause the slightest doubt.
    The main thing, so that it does not work out, is not a horse feed.
  21. xomaNN 24 February 2020 17: 08 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    "... But do we not swing our arms at Gibraltar ??!" wassat

    (Almost a quote from the character of Evstigneev in the folk theater of the film "Watch Out for the Car")
    1. Petrol cutter 24 February 2020 17: 12 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Interesting thought. The main thing is bold, fresh, dynamic!
      Unexpectedly in the end.
  22. Warrior MorePhoto 24 February 2020 18: 26 New
    • 4
    • 2
    +2
    Are needed!
    But the question, it seems to me, is not the right one, can we contain, supply and fully formulate this?

    The first thing is that creating a base in Cuba, Venezuela, Vietnam and so on is the Navy ... how are we doing with this?
    Yes, of course Varshavyanka and Karakurt will do some kind of weather near the shore, but this is the background, and the base should be of type 22350M minimum 2 ships, 22350 2 minimum 1 ships, ideally Leaders at least XNUMX piece, which we had plastic models from which NATO America and other "partners" were in shock, but this option is still closed for today.
    Submarines such as Ash, at least 1 piece, here, too, everything is not ice.

    We need to look at the map depending on the location of the hypothetically open bases and understand whether the aircraft can reach them if some sort of political seam starts (and they can arrange it “partners” quickly), for this it’s good (even necessary!) To have an aircraft carrier.
    Let’s say the delivery of goods will be resolved, although also not everything is ideally with this, in general, the convoy to them should be in the form of 22350.
    It would be nice to have a helicopter carrier, which we have for ourselves only in the project.

    Further, aviation - in general, with this I think is relatively good, but it should also be modern devices that cost money, and we will only have Su 57 - 72 units in 8 years.

    The staff probably is, and it will be formed, but it is here that it will need to be increased, for control and other things.

    As a result, if you do not even take financing, with our pace of construction, it takes 10 years to open one base.

    And now with financing ... an economic growth of 1.5% is like a country’s general, I won’t even talk about the situation with salaries, pensions and the poverty level for now ...

    How many bases do you say we need?
    1. Petrol cutter 24 February 2020 20: 02 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Real answer request
  23. PSih2097 24 February 2020 19: 20 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The people, and what kind of submarine, similar to the 941 project, is shown in miniature in the photo?
    1. SVD68 25 February 2020 07: 46 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      This is it. Photo from the side of the tail.
      1. PSih2097 25 February 2020 21: 06 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: SVD68
        This is it. Photo from the side of the tail.

        No, in 941 projects, the felling was carried back ...
        1. SVD68 25 February 2020 21: 40 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          She is carried back. The photo was just taken from the other side - from the stern, and not from the bow, as in the photo in your message.
  24. Lontus 25 February 2020 18: 01 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    First you need to collect Russia fragmented by Russophobes,
    and only then think about foreign military bases.
    And then it reaches the point of absurdity - the Russian Chernigov and Kharkov are under natophiles, and the compradors protect their native Israel from the militants who have gone out of its control in Syria.