Hero of Russia: It is important for Ukraine to understand that Russia is the only guarantor of its territorial integrity

Hero of Russia: It is important for Ukraine to understand that Russia is the only guarantor of its territorial integrity

Armed Forces Armed Forces


Today in the Ukrainian media of an openly propaganda sense materials came out in which the authors announced "the victory of the APU in the Lugansk direction." Describing yesterday’s situation, the Ukrainian media once again stated that the LPR People’s Opposition allegedly went on the offensive, but was “driven back by the Ukrainian military,” after which it “requested silence.”

Apparently, the Ukrainian authors themselves did not understand what they gave out for public discussion. Indeed, even if we assume that everything was so, the question immediately arises: how did it turn out that in the area of ​​the separation of forces and equipment there were Ukrainian military personnel who “stopped the attack"? .. After all, by all agreements, they should have been a few kilometers from the demarcation line.

Military Review asked the Chairman of the Presidium of the public organization Russian Officers, Hero of Russia, Major General Sergey Lipov to comment on the situation. The general noted that all this had been planned so that Kiev would once again have the opportunity to declare the topic of “terrorists from the Donbass” that has faded somewhat on the international scene. He noted that sabotage groups of the Armed Forces of Ukraine were used for this.

Sergey Lipovoy:

And these sabotage will continue until the Ukrainian authorities have the political will to end the conflict. But it cannot appear, because war is a wonderful business for the Ukrainian elite, and the Western military corporations associated with it, especially American ones. Zelensky and his partners, following Poroshenko, continue to cynically prey on the deaths of ordinary Ukrainian soldiers. Such a policy will lead to another Maidan, as a result of which Ukraine will lose territories not only in the East, but also in the West. And Zelensky himself will end worse than Yanukovych.

At the same time, Lipova noted that it is important for Ukraine to understand: the only guarantor of its territorial integrity is Russia.
Photos used:
Facebook / 36 OMB APU
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

124 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Kronos 19 February 2020 13: 27 New
    • 16
    • 31
    -15
    After the annexation of Crimea to Russia, it is strange to say
    1. Dmitry Donskoy 19 February 2020 13: 37 New
      • 11
      • 18
      -7
      There are no longer any brothers or sisters of the Slavs. A bunch of greedy, lazy and envious ghouls remained. hi
      1. Tatyana 19 February 2020 14: 02 New
        • 6
        • 2
        +4
        Sergey Lipovoy:
        And these sabotage will continue until the Ukrainian authorities have the political will to end the conflict. But it cannot appear, because war is a wonderful business for the Ukrainian elite, and the Western military corporations associated with it, especially American ones. Zelensky and his partners, following Poroshenko, continue to cynically prey on the deaths of ordinary Ukrainian soldiers. Such a policy will lead to another Maidan, as a result of which Ukraine will lose territories not only in the East, but also in the West. And Zelensky himself will end worse than Yanukovych.


        Well, after all, the Ukrainian Zionist and leader of the Great Ukraine party, Igor Berkut, said about the future in Ukraine that "Today's Ukraine belongs to a small group of oligarchs who own all the riches of Ukraine, but along with them - by chance, they also got a population that they did not ask for. Therefore, everything in the dying zone must be" disposed of "!


        5 million inhabitants will be enough for Ukraine, the rest will be utilized by Igor Berkut. January 20, 2018
        1. Nevsky_ZU 19 February 2020 14: 25 New
          • 2
          • 1
          +1
          Igor Berkut. January 20, 2018

          As I understand it, this video was uploaded on January 20, 2018. And he said this in 2011 if my memory serves me right.
      2. Karaul73 19 February 2020 14: 02 New
        • 4
        • 3
        +1
        I advise you to look in the mirror. And more closely. Suddenly the ghoul will see.
    2. Odysseus 19 February 2020 13: 52 New
      • 7
      • 7
      0
      Quote: Kronos
      After the annexation of Crimea to Russia, it is strange to say

      I would say tougher, sometimes it’s better to chew, not talk. The general is not a politician, why he crawls where it is not necessary.
      Our authorities recognize the authorities of Ukraine, the authorities of Ukraine believe that the concept of territorial integrity includes both Donbass and Crimea. That is, in fact, the general proposed to transfer Crimea to Ukraine and said that Russia acts as a guarantor here.
    3. Prisoner 19 February 2020 14: 22 New
      • 2
      • 2
      0
      It was helpful! Or snuggle up and do not go over to the camp of the enemies of Russia or kirdyk you traitorous faces. In addition, Crimea, Russian land as the south, east and north of Little Russia.
    4. Invoce 19 February 2020 14: 24 New
      • 21
      • 1
      +20
      Quote: Kronos
      After the annexation of Crimea to Russia, it is strange to say

      When it was that Crimea was connected? belay There were some protests from Crimeans, arrests, police raids, manipulation of documents ??? no Did not have. Ukraine fought for the Crimea, for "their" territory, for which for centuries shed blood and sweat? no I didn’t fight. Maybe Ukraine has invested billions of dollars in the development of the Crimea and its population, and the insidious Russia has taken by force what Ukraine has torn from itself and given to the Crimeans? no! Maybe Russia transferred Crimea to Ukraine voluntarily or sold it for money? no fool Also no! Crimea was transferred to the Ukrainian SSR N. Khrushchev on the basis of eternal friendship between peoples and the streamlining of households. activities on the peninsula.
      1. The Ukrainian SSR did not ....
      2. Friendship was gone and prerequisites for the deployment of NATO bases in Crimea appeared.
      3. There was a threat to the Sevastopol base, although Sevastopol was not transferred to the Ukrainian SSR Khrushchev ...
      4. Nationalists from the UPA (Bandera) sent pacification trains to Crimea, and before that Crimea met the "Berkut" soldiers who died on the Maidan ... those who defended Ukraine from Nazi hordes who made a coup.
      So what right do you have to say that Crimea was annexed? belay
      Crimeans expressed their will and joined their family from despair and threats.
      It’s like the daughter of her parents who has left the roommate, who has returned to her family. The marriage is not officially registered, does not bring money to the "family", the daughter and children tyranny ... Who will condemn them in this case? Only the friends of the ushlepok, those who thumped at the expense of the one who went to mom and dad.
      1. Kronos 19 February 2020 15: 26 New
        • 3
        • 14
        -11
        It doesn’t matter how this is done; it’s legally important that the population of Ukraine perceives it negatively
        1. tihonmarine 19 February 2020 15: 45 New
          • 6
          • 1
          +5
          Quote: Kronos
          It doesn’t matter how this is done; it’s legally important that the population of Ukraine perceives it negatively

          Sorry, I want to ask, what does the population of Ukraine perceive positively?
          1. Kronos 19 February 2020 15: 55 New
            • 3
            • 7
            -4
            You can argue as much as you like, but not a single country will understand the loss of part of the territories no matter how legally they were in it and the accession of this territory to a neighbor
            1. Aleksandr1971 19 February 2020 16: 14 New
              • 5
              • 1
              +4
              You're not right. Currently, there is not a single European country that has not lost any territory within the limits of the history we know. Probably the same with Asian countries. And most "sit and blather" about this. And most of all in Europe Russia lost lands, for example, lost Poland, Ukraine, Belarus, the Baltic states and so on. and so on. So Ukraine will also accept the loss, fortunately, the loss is very small. But they could lose half the country.
              1. Kronos 19 February 2020 16: 17 New
                • 3
                • 9
                -6
                Nevertheless, no one legally recognized Crimea except Abkhazia and a couple of small countries. Redistributions in history, of course, were always only direct captures without references about referenda
                1. Aleksandr1971 19 February 2020 16: 32 New
                  • 5
                  • 1
                  +4
                  The failure to recognize the annexation of Crimea to Russia may take a long time. For example, England did not recognize the sovereignty of France from the 14th century to the 19th century, although this did not prevent the conclusion of treaties between them. And this non-recognition was expressed with the proclamation of the English monarch at the same time as king of France. Only under Napoleon did the British finally abandon this fiction. With Russia it will be about the same, "plus - minutes one or two centuries" ....
                2. tihonmarine 19 February 2020 17: 50 New
                  • 3
                  • 2
                  +1
                  Quote: Kronos
                  Nevertheless, no one legally recognized Crimea except Abkhazia and a couple of small countries

                  The main Crimeans recognized that the Crimean. Now, if they recognized you, then Crimea would remain as part of Ukraine, but for some reason they do not want to return to you. So think about why they wanted to be with Russia. And why didn’t you keep Crimea? Just think like people for once without these your slogans.
              2. revnagan 20 February 2020 20: 40 New
                • 0
                • 1
                -1
                Quote: Aleksandr1971
                most of all in Europe Russia lost lands, for example, lost Poland, Ukraine, Belarus, the Baltic states and so on. and so on.

                How could Russia lose something that does not belong to it? Who owns the land on which I live? IT IS MY LAND. Poland belonged to Russia? It is property of Russia, and Poles are serfs? Ukraine decided to live on its own. How could it belong to Russia? My grandfathers were not serfs of Russia in order to belong to it. You say that a free man dreams of freedom. A slave dreams of his slaves. It seems that Russians need humble slaves - Ukrainians, Balts, Poles ... Humiliated and repentant .How do you need this? And after that you consider yourself free people?
            2. tihonmarine 19 February 2020 17: 43 New
              • 4
              • 1
              +3
              Quote: Kronos
              You can argue as much as you like, but not a single country will understand the loss of part of the territories no matter how legally they were in it and the accession of this territory to a neighbor

              Have you asked the residents of Crimea, or are you just thinking about yourself? Or do you think they are not people? Crimea is Crimea, not Ukraine, and why should you decide for them? And you scream
              1. Kronos 19 February 2020 17: 45 New
                • 4
                • 6
                -2
                I do not scream I need the USSR without Russian or Ukrainian oligarchs
          2. Alex Nevs 19 February 2020 16: 56 New
            • 4
            • 3
            +1
            horse racing is the most important thing. Higher. Higher.
          3. The comment was deleted.
        2. Incvizitor 19 February 2020 17: 31 New
          • 4
          • 3
          +1
          The opinion of Crimeans expressed in a referendum is important, and all sorts of Ukrainians themselves jumped it.
          1. tihonmarine 19 February 2020 17: 51 New
            • 2
            • 2
            0
            Quote: Incvizitor
            The opinion of Crimeans expressed in a referendum is important, and all sorts of Ukrainians themselves jumped it.

            Let's just say, jumped.
        3. Krasnoyarsk 19 February 2020 17: 49 New
          • 3
          • 2
          +1
          Quote: Kronos
          It doesn’t matter how this is done; it’s legally important that the population of Ukraine perceives it negatively

          The population of Ukraine has long come to terms with this, but you constantly awaken this topic and constantly sow unrealistic hopes for its return. You yourself do not believe what you are talking about, but still with tenacity worthy of another application, you dream of a pipe dream.
          By the way, I understand your feelings and sympathize .. But .. what has been done is done and you can’t bring anything back. And in order not to lose territories anymore, you need to think about the reasons. Why did Crimea leave? Agree, if the inhabitants of the Crimea Peninsula did not want accession to Russia, then nothing would have happened. But why did they want to leave for Russia, and why does the Donbass also want to follow the path of Crimea? This is the question you must answer. Is it because they disdained Russian residents of the Crimea and Donbass? Think, try to take their place.
          So, this is not annexation, it is a punishment for your sins before the Russian citizens of Ukraine.
          1. Kronos 19 February 2020 17: 52 New
            • 3
            • 5
            -2
            I do not need Crimea but the communist revolution
            1. Krasnoyarsk 19 February 2020 17: 54 New
              • 2
              • 0
              +2
              Quote: Kronos
              I do not need Crimea but the communist revolution

              hi
          2. revnagan 20 February 2020 20: 53 New
            • 0
            • 2
            -2
            Quote: Krasnoyarsk
            The population of Ukraine has long come to terms with this,

            Why did you get this because you want it so much?
            Quote: Krasnoyarsk
            unrealistic hopes of his return

            Why unrealistic? For over 50 years, the Japanese have owned half of Sakhalin, but the time has come, and the USSR regained the territory, previously pro .. um, stupidly lost by tsarist Russia. Everything could be in life. For example, after the departure of GDP, Russia will fall apart and will not be able to support Crimea ... That's all.
            Quote: Krasnoyarsk
            By the way, I understand your feelings and sympathize ..

            We don’t need sympathy. Save it for yourself. Until then, when everything starts to crumble with you too. But Russia will begin, although it has more than Ukraine, and in terms of safety margin, but goes the Ukrainian way. Sanctions are doing their job, the indigenous population is dying out , oligarchs and officials are completely outrageous. So it’s wise to just sit on the riverbank and wait for the body of the enemy to pass by.
            Quote: Krasnoyarsk
            But why did they want to leave for Russia, and why does the Donbass also want to follow the path of Crimea?

            And because Russian pensions and salaries are higher than Ukrainian ones. But not everything is expressed in money. And the price of this money can be very high wink .
            Quote: Krasnoyarsk
            So, this is not annexation, it is a punishment for your sins before the Russian citizens of Ukraine.

            Wow, and Russia, therefore, imagines itself to be the punishing right hand of the Lord, and decided that it has the right to punish and pardon at its discretion? Oh God, another “chosen” country on our head ...
            1. Krasnoyarsk 20 February 2020 23: 16 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Quote: revnagan

              We don’t need sympathy. Save it for yourself. Until then, when everything starts to crumble with you too. But Russia will begin, although it has more than Ukraine, and in terms of safety margin, but goes the Ukrainian way. Sanctions are doing their job, the indigenous population is dying out , oligarchs and officials are completely outrageous. So it’s wise to just sit on the riverbank and wait for the body of the enemy to pass by.

              I understand from your fantasies that while Russia will "collapse", Ukraine will do what? Prosper? Build your strength with leaps and bounds? Are you serious?
              Quote: revnagan
              And because Russian pensions and salaries are higher than Ukrainian ones. But not everything is expressed in money. And the price of this money can be very high

              So you said correctly - "not everything is expressed in money" And the conclusion was made directly opposite - they left because of money. And they hit the sky with a finger. Gone because you began to ban the Russian language. By and large, the Russian language did not bother you. Schools were, teachers were, textbooks were, i.e. that 100 pupils study at school, that with the Ukrainian language of instruction, that with Russian the same funding. But someone really needed to quarrel the two nations. Rather, destroy Ukraine as an economic entity, and this is easy to do by quarreling two peoples within one state. And you pecked at that bait. You decided, well, your “friends” told you so that when you create a mononational state, by assimilation, partial destruction and expulsion of the remaining non-Ukrainians, will you immediately make a breakthrough in economic terms? You, you personally, are sure that you yourself do not believe in this. Then tell me the secret of what is the point of the struggle of present-day Ukraine with the Russian language, and therefore with the Russians.
              And let's not forget that both the Crimea and the Donbass happened the day after the repeal of the law on the languages ​​of the Maidanutyh who seized power.
              If the bloody pastor came to the rebellious Donbass and asked - men what you want - they would answer him - Russian schools, there is no Bandera and other Western women and everything would be decided peacefully. But he sent tanks. We see the result. And in order not to become guilty, he started a massive fake with a Russian invasion.
              1. revnagan 21 February 2020 10: 48 New
                • 0
                • 1
                -1
                Quote: Krasnoyarsk
                You began to ban the Russian language.

                Quote: Krasnoyarsk
                you pecked at this fishing rod.

                Quote: Krasnoyarsk
                You decided, well, your "friends" told you so,

                The conclusions are obvious to you, but completely groundless. First, you overestimate the capabilities of my humble person — I did not decide, did not forbid, did not “bait”. What is your trouble: you think that everything is clear to you (well, of course! ), and you are dealing with stupid raguli. Well, it’s obvious, yes? And here it is. Before the regulation of 14 years, almost half of the population of Ukraine was Russian, and another 40 percent were Russian-speaking. Only here is the refusal of the Crimeans by the Russians to jointly fight for Russian (not Russian, namely Russian) Ukraine, without the oligarchs, I personally regard it as a betrayal. And the seizure by Russia, on a convenient pretext, at a difficult time for Ukraine of Ukrainian territory (and not the fight against the "junta", as your media trumpeted it) opened to people Ukraine is the true face of oligarchic-capitalist Russia. And believe me, I don’t want to have anything in common with such Russia. Against the background of pathetic attempts to prove that everything was done "according to the Law." Ukraine just needs to moderate its ambitions, to "close" the war in the Donbass , survive, accumulate potential and wait I am in my own time. And he will definitely come.
                1. Krasnoyarsk 21 February 2020 11: 13 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Quote: revnagan
                  overestimate the possibilities of my humble

                  Here you misunderstood me. saying - you, I didn’t mean you. When I talk about you, I write with a capital letter.
                  Quote: revnagan
                  Only here is the refusal of Russian Crimeans from a joint struggle for a Russian (not Russian, namely Russian) Ukraine, without the oligarchs, I personally regard it as a betrayal.

                  Excuse me, but who called "Crimeans to a joint struggle for Russian Ukraine"? You? And they heard and refused? Strange, at least claims.
                  Quote: revnagan
                  And the capture of Russia under a convenient pretext, in a difficult Ukrainian moment for Ukraine,

                  Well, here you are again - capture. This word speaks of forceful action. And was he? You know very well that ANY government, in any country, if it is not profitable for it, will not allow a referendum. And so that in Crimea, the Ukrainian authorities, in violation of the law, Crimea, as an autonomous republic, had the right to hold a referendum and not impede its holding, the Russian MTR blocked the security forces of Ukraine. For one purpose - to give residents of the Crimea to express their opinion. I would also like for us more often to ask the opinion of the people on pressing issues.
                  Quote: revnagan
                  (and not a fight with the "junta," as your media trumpeted)

                  Your untruth, no one said anything like that about Crimea.
                  But you didn’t say anything, your opinion, about the struggle against the Russian language - why is this struggle needed? What is the purpose?
                  1. revnagan 23 February 2020 11: 57 New
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    0
                    Quote: Krasnoyarsk
                    Your opinion about the fight against the Russian language - why is this fight needed? What is the purpose?

                    There are several goals:
                    -firstly, to distract people from the realities of life (rising prices, stopping enterprises, in general, worsening economic conditions);
                    - goal number two - the Galician-Jewish nationalists who seized power, amuse themselves with their feelings and satisfy their complexes, demonstrating to the people of Ukraine and the whole world: “here we are, how are you. And what will you do?” The fact is that they are still they remember how poor they were accepted into Ukraine in 1939. And that their contribution to the well-being of Ukraine is zero. And if we take into account what Bandera did, then ... And then you see what kind of “contribution” - “Move” was revived! Well, at least something! "Though you need to crush the casing, just not to walk!";
                    - the goal is three. Demonstratively oppose Ukraine to Russia, hurt Russians (well, at least!), and, if possible, raise money on demonstrative Russophobia, like the Baltics. But here it should be understood that Ukraine has 5 times more population. than in the Baltic . Yes and not the 90s is now in the yard. However, at least a fraction of the small Galitsai will certainly be thrown for this.
                    At the household level, in families, at work, everyone speaks Russian. Yes, the formidable "circulars" and "pointers" directly prescribe: all documentation should be urgently translated into Ukrainian. And if it is really Ukrainian, and not newspeak Polish-Galician-Jewish-German hell knows that, I don’t mind. The trouble is that there are simply no analogues to many Russian words in the Ukrainian language. Yes, even in the technical literature, terms. But it is the “newspeak” that is being imposed. Without laughter, new documents cannot be read, and the meaning is lost .. ..But, as they say: "Bachili ochі, what did you buy? Ї
                    1. Krasnoyarsk 23 February 2020 13: 20 New
                      • 0
                      • 0
                      0
                      Quote: revnagan
                      There are several goals:

                      Alexey! good good good
                      I don’t even need to add. But still add. The main dream, these, well, you understand who I mean, to bleed Russia and Ukraine in a real war. And many local commentators do not understand this and call for “to force peace” with the force option in mind. Those. in fact, they are on the side of those in Ukraine and overseas who want a war with Russia.
                  2. revnagan 23 February 2020 12: 09 New
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    0
                    Quote: Krasnoyarsk
                    Excuse me, but who called "Crimeans to a joint struggle for Russian Ukraine"? You? And they heard and refused?

                    And who was supposed to "call"? "Government" of Ukraine? The people? Was there time for calls? Or was it not clear that it was a matter of confrontation? And in this situation, they are fleeing to Russia, weakening the Russians in Ukraine and essentially throwing them out of Russian money? Traitors.
                    Quote: Krasnoyarsk
                    Well, here you are again - capture. This word speaks of forceful action. And was he?

                    You won’t throw words out of a song. Capture is capture. Capture of our ship (I remember how it was driven by helicopters on the bay!), Our military base, bases, blocking them by Russian troops (and we considered the Russian Federation a decent state!) .. .
                    Quote: Krasnoyarsk
                    Crimea, as an autonomous republic, had the right to hold a referendum,

                    Crimea did not have the right to hold a referendum on the territorial integrity of Ukraine. And you KNOW this very well. The Constitution of any state stipulates on which issues referenda are held, on which - no. For example, regarding the growth of salary, retirement age, etc. about the territorial integrity of the state, all the more. You can read your Constitution. And you will see that your republics also do not have this right. Russia violated international law with all its consequences.
                    1. Krasnoyarsk 23 February 2020 13: 41 New
                      • 0
                      • 1
                      -1
                      Quote: revnagan
                      And you KNOW IT PERFECTLY.

                      I know. Crimea had its own government and its own armed forces, not BP, but the armed forces. In the year 91, initially, Crimea, as an autonomous republic, had rights that Kuchma, with the help of fraud and pressure, curtailed with the help of his protege. So, we know.
                      In addition, do not forget, Russia took the Crimea, if by and large, then - by battle, to Ukraine it was raised on a plate with a blue border. In addition, Sevastopol was not part of the Crimea, as a territorial and economic unit. And therefore, Ukraine brazenly chopped it off, taking advantage of the fact that Borya had a hangover.
                      But to be honest, it has been so since ancient times, the one who is stronger owns the land. The Japanese were stronger and owned the Kuril Islands and Sakhalin, the USSR became stronger - if you please move. So it was, it is, it will be so. Everything is old as the world.
                      1. revnagan 23 February 2020 16: 32 New
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        0
                        Quote: Krasnoyarsk
                        But to be honest, it has been so since ancient times, the one who is stronger owns the land.

                        Well, and why should Russia “shag grandma?” “A referendum ... according to the law ...” Openly say “we are stronger, that's why you were robbed” - a thin face? Well, then there’s nothing to moan about the evil Bandera’s, which’s not give water to drink. Remember, from a letter from the Cossacks to the Turkish sultan: “... we will fight with you .. land and water ..” And in one of the books there was also such: “... poison in a goblet, a dagger in darkness. .. ". The strong have their own methods, the weak have their own. This is a war (in the cold phase), and not a knightly duel. The aim of the war is to damage the enemy. It’s all business ... Especially since from a legal point of view Russia is strong not right (to put it mildly), therefore, Ukraine and cards in hand.
                      2. Krasnoyarsk 23 February 2020 17: 28 New
                        • 0
                        • 1
                        -1
                        Quote: revnagan
                        Well, why should Russia “shag grandma?” “A referendum ... by law ...

                        Uh, dear, you didn’t go there. I talked about - in general, but there are also special cases. So, let's not generalize.
                        Russia had no choice. 1. There was a probability of the development of events according to the Donbass scenario.
                        2. The possibility of the appearance of a military base in the Crimea and, of course, not the Belorussian one, was possible. Does Russia need this? This is a threat to Russia's security. Take the place of the Darkest. And you would do exactly the same. Although you, I’m sure, would not even hold a referendum. If Ukraine had not started this fuss with joining NATO, then ... Who knows how events would have developed. Anyway, if you impartially, from the perspective of an outside observer, evaluate the whole course of events, then, I believe, you will positively evaluate the actions of Russia in the Crimea. Yes, the doctor often hurts the patient. But for the good of the patient. Something like this. Bearing in mind the future close alliance of the three sisters.
                      3. revnagan 24 February 2020 13: 02 New
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        0
                        Quote: Krasnoyarsk
                        Uh, dear, you didn’t go there. I talked about - in general, but there are also special cases.

                        I don’t understand something. That is, when it’s impossible at all, but if Russia’s a “special case”, then it’s possible, and when others have such a “special case” in relation to Russia, it’s again “impossible”? How interesting belay
                        .
                        Quote: Krasnoyarsk
                        Take the place of the Darkest.

                        No, thank you. Although I am a scumbag, but not as much ...
                        Quote: Krasnoyarsk
                        And in general, if you impartially, from the position of an outside observer, evaluate the whole course of events, then, I believe, you will positively evaluate the actions of Russia in Crimea.

                        Why would this be? Do you assess the situation from the position of the Russian inhabitant “Hurray, Krymnash!”, And I should assess from the perspective of an outsider? No, I assess from the position of a citizen of Ukraine: our territory was taken away by force in violation of all assurances, it was treacherous with Ukraine therefore it is bad and mean. Point.
                        Quote: Krasnoyarsk
                        Yes, the doctor often hurts the patient. But for the good of the patient.

                        An interesting doctor, you hurt a neighbor so that you feel good. So it’s not the doctors who act, but Hannibal Lecturer.
                        Quote: Krasnoyarsk
                        Bearing in mind the future close alliance of the three sisters.

                        After this, there can be no question of any “union.” Unless the USSR is reborn .... Let Russia conclude alliances with the Syrians and Maduro. “Died, she died.”
                      4. Krasnoyarsk 24 February 2020 13: 18 New
                        • 0
                        • 1
                        -1
                        Quote: revnagan

                        After this, there can be no question of any “union.” Unless the USSR is reborn .... Let Russia conclude alliances with the Syrians and Maduro. “Died, she died.”

                        Everything that you wrote in this post, continuous emotions. Sober logic is missing. I'm sorry. But this will not affect my attitude to you, and, especially, to Ukraine.
  • codetalker 19 February 2020 15: 20 New
    • 7
    • 2
    +5
    No, not strange. The accession of Crimea to Russia does not violate the integrity of Ukraine. Crimea has never been a part of Ukraine. It was an autonomous republic, and the nature of their interaction was administratively confidential. This can be found out by everyone who can read and bother to study the current situation at that time in Ukraine.
    Also, the British exit from the EU does not violate the integrity of Belgium on the basis of which the EU headquarters operates in Brussels.
    1. Kronos 19 February 2020 15: 28 New
      • 2
      • 3
      -1
      The EU is not a state of which Britain was a part. There are much more suitable comparisons with the exit of Catalonia from Spain or Scotland from England.
    2. tihonmarine 19 February 2020 17: 53 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Quote: codetalker
      This can be found out by everyone who can read and bother to study the current situation at that time in Ukraine.

      So before you read, you need to learn how to read, that is, read, and understand what is written there.
  • orionvitt 19 February 2020 16: 19 New
    • 5
    • 1
    +4
    Quote: Kronos
    After the annexation of Crimea to Russia, it is strange to say

    Do not confuse soft with warm. Crimea and Donbass, this is a direct consequence of the Maidan (anti-constitutional armed coup), and where does Russia, which acted strictly according to circumstances?
    1. Odysseus 19 February 2020 16: 48 New
      • 5
      • 2
      +3
      Quote: orionvitt
      Do not confuse soft with warm. Crimea and Donbass, this is a direct consequence of the Maidan (anti-constitutional armed coup), and where does Russia, which acted strictly according to circumstances?

      True, but the general then says that the Russian Federation is its guarantor territorial integrity . At the same time, the Russian authorities recognized Maidan Ukraine, and she (and with it the rest of the world) believes that Crimea is part of Ukraine.
      So Kronos is right, this statement is, to put it mildly, strange. It was not necessary to say so, especially since this is not the general’s business.
  • Alexga 19 February 2020 13: 27 New
    • 6
    • 5
    +1
    what is important for Ukraine to understand: the only guarantor of its territorial integrity is Russia

    But do they need to give this guarantee?
    1. Tuzik 19 February 2020 17: 15 New
      • 3
      • 3
      0
      In Ukraine, the question is different: "Do you need to believe these guarantees?"
    2. revnagan 20 February 2020 20: 55 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      Quote: AlexGa
      But do they need to give this guarantee?

      And Russia has already given a “guarantee”. Territorial integrity in exchange for nuclear weapons. No more “guarantees.” Contracts with Russia are not worth the paper on which they subscribe.
  • Aerodrome 19 February 2020 13: 29 New
    • 5
    • 2
    +3
    Today in the Ukrainian media of an openly propaganda sense materials came out in which the authors announced "the victory of the APU in the Lugansk direction." Describing the situation yesterday, the Ukrainian media once again stated that the LPR People’s Opposition allegedly went on the offensive, but was “driven back by the Ukrainian military,” after which it “requested silence”
    quote from Lavrov, Sergey Viktorovich ...
  • Machito 19 February 2020 13: 29 New
    • 6
    • 5
    +1
    This circus will continue until they complete the SP-2.
    1. Svarog 19 February 2020 14: 03 New
      • 4
      • 3
      +1
      Quote: Bearded
      This circus will continue until they complete the SP-2.

      Who knows, maybe the number of clowns will even increase after SP2 .. Ukraine is not only a transit country, but also 40 ml .. a population that is carefully set against us ..
    2. Karaul73 19 February 2020 14: 04 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      And what will happen after that?
      1. Gado 19 February 2020 15: 03 New
        • 4
        • 1
        +3
        And you are completely unclear, right? Do you think the Americans in vain are pushing the fraternal peoples against each other? Fascists lit in vain? Sadly, one must prepare for war. It was already in history, only now the Russian will kill the Russian ... My personal opinion, perhaps, may not come true.
  • Fishery 19 February 2020 13: 30 New
    • 8
    • 23
    -15
    he noted that it is important for Russia to understand: the United States is the only guarantor of its territorial integrity, it sounds about the same, its elites have been robbing Ukraine for 30 years, and the St. Petersburg cooperative has now joined.
    1. Andrey VOV 19 February 2020 13: 36 New
      • 9
      • 6
      +3
      Do you understand what you wrote?
    2. gridasov 19 February 2020 13: 36 New
      • 3
      • 2
      +1
      Obviously, you are not familiar with historical facts of how, in a very soft word, they carry out the robbery and destruction of peoples, those who are now distributing pies. And they don’t give it away already, but they demand to return it. So it’s never so bad that it’s not worse.
      1. tihonmarine 19 February 2020 17: 56 New
        • 2
        • 1
        +1
        Quote: gridasov
        And they don’t give it away already, but they demand to return

        Oh, and these Nuland cookies are expensive for Ukraine. Free cookies are not even served on papierite, it’s time to figure this out.
    3. ochakow703 19 February 2020 13: 38 New
      • 5
      • 4
      +1
      Uuuuuu, how it’s not healthy with you ... you need to treat, treat.
    4. Alex Nevs 19 February 2020 16: 58 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Mattresses have her most nibalui. And then St. Petersburg?
  • Yrec 19 February 2020 13: 37 New
    • 6
    • 5
    +1
    I believe that Ukraine has exhausted its “statehood” and, with time, will disappear from the political map of the world. That's just how this process will occur and how to accompany it - an open question.
    1. Fishery 19 February 2020 13: 38 New
      • 4
      • 5
      -1
      here I agree, there is a possibility.
      1. Dur_mod 19 February 2020 13: 44 New
        • 8
        • 11
        -3
        Break off, the power of idiots and creatures ruling now in Ukraine will disappear. It’s too late to hope for the collapse of Ukraine, the inhabitants of Ukraine have already formed as a nation, the memory of the generations of the 50s and 60s remains with them, the current generation does not remember the Union and there are no illusions about the brotherhood, after Crimea, no one experiences. External enemies, both from the east and from the west, will no longer be able to ruin the country, only internal.
        1. Lopatov 19 February 2020 13: 53 New
          • 11
          • 2
          +9
          Quote: Dur_mod
          residents of Ukraine have already formed as a nation

          And with great pleasure they burn each other in the Houses of Trade Unions and shoot at them with artillery shells in the east of the country ... And in the west they are forced to crawl on their knees for "wrong political orientation" ...
          Such a unity that direct envy take ...
          1. Fishery 19 February 2020 13: 58 New
            • 3
            • 15
            -12
            and in the Russian Federation there were no such periods in history?
            1. Lopatov 19 February 2020 14: 01 New
              • 10
              • 4
              +6
              With what phrase does the Ukrainian patriot begin the discussion of the problems of his country?
              That's right, with the phrase "And you have in Russia"
              1. Fishery 19 February 2020 14: 04 New
                • 5
                • 19
                -14
                ))) since in Russia every news release is like there in Ukraine))))) answer for your log in the eye) and I'm not a patriot of Ukraine and the Russian Federation in the generally accepted sense, it’s just not clear brotherly love is strange, they squeezed Crimea quietly peacefully, Donetsk with Lugansk somehow you don’t take, why?
                1. Lopatov 19 February 2020 14: 17 New
                  • 6
                  • 2
                  +4
                  Quote: Tonya
                  so in the Russian Federation each news release as there in Ukraine)))))

                  Not everyone, do not believe the Ukrainian agitation prop.
                  1. Fishery 19 February 2020 14: 20 New
                    • 2
                    • 13
                    -11
                    I was in Moscow a year ago, I had the pleasure of watching it personally for 7 months) and I have experience living in Russia for a total of 20 years, from an amusing military commissar in Magnitogorsk I did not know that Ukraine is another state, it was 2000 in the yard) now I probably know )
                    1. Lopatov 19 February 2020 14: 35 New
                      • 4
                      • 1
                      +3
                      Quote: Tonya
                      was in Moscow a year ago, 7 months had the pleasure of watching it personally)

                      Why then lie, and a resident of Russia?
                      1. Fishery 19 February 2020 14: 36 New
                        • 1
                        • 7
                        -6
                        Well of course everyone lies except you
                      2. Lopatov 19 February 2020 14: 48 New
                        • 5
                        • 2
                        +3
                        Did I lie to you? No. And you're lying to me.
                      3. Fishery 19 February 2020 14: 55 New
                        • 3
                        • 8
                        -5
                        the first channel right now)))) discussion of the conflict in the Donbas)))) live) and in the news section discuss the May 9 parade in Kiev, and the UN Security Council
                        https://www.1tv.ru/live
            2. Guards turn 19 February 2020 14: 52 New
              • 3
              • 2
              +1
              Turned on TSN news:
              Ruble's exchange rate
              Oil and gas futures prices
              The opinion of an economist on the state of the economy in the first quarter
              Political scientist tells what problems the Russian Federation will face if it rewrites the constitution
              Weather in Kiev for tomorrow!
    2. Aleksandr1971 19 February 2020 16: 41 New
      • 3
      • 1
      +2
      Not too late. The fact that a generation has grown in Ukraine that does not remember the USSR does not exclude the collapse of this state in the future. To prove to you that in the past there were a lot of disappeared states with their generations of different ages. And the territories of these disappeared states are now in other states. There have also been cases in the world and in Europe where states lost part of their territory, but returned these territories 50 or 100 or 200 years later. There were a huge number of such cases, and each with its own specifics. If you want, then I will throw a lot of examples. But the fact that a generation of independence appeared in Ukraine is not at all a guarantee of independence.
    3. Alex Nevs 19 February 2020 16: 59 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      And the internal ones, just under the command of the external ones, are already selling land. Railway already drunk.
    4. Incvizitor 19 February 2020 17: 33 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      This is a poorly stitched and forcibly held patchwork quilt of Russian occupied and western lands.
  • Karaul73 19 February 2020 14: 08 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    Yes, Russia still exists in today's border only due to the presence of nuclear weapons. If the jackals hadn’t already torn it apart.
  • tihonmarine 19 February 2020 17: 59 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Quote: Yrec

    I believe that Ukraine has exhausted its "statehood"

    I did not manage to take place, but already exhausted. An interesting axiom is obtained.
  • Nonna 19 February 2020 13: 53 New
    • 11
    • 5
    +6
    The peoples of Russia and Ukraine have one enemy - the internal one - a spike of offshore capitalists with thieving officials of all stripes. Nothing will help Ukraine. Section only
    1. Fishery 19 February 2020 14: 08 New
      • 2
      • 8
      -6
      and to whom to divide, enlighten?
      1. Nonna 19 February 2020 14: 17 New
        • 8
        • 3
        +5
        Ukrainian Frankenstein hastily created a political entity, there is no such nation - Ukrainians. This is the outskirts of Russia. There is Little Russia and there is a wild Selyukovschina - Western Galicia. all my life she was under the whips of princes and princes. Decay is inevitable - a matter of time
        1. Fishery 19 February 2020 14: 27 New
          • 3
          • 10
          -7
          perhaps it should be said that the western regions are happy to integrate into Poland, well, except for stubborn patriots with forelocks, but the eastern ones in the Russian Federation have more questions, in Poland at least the standard of living is high, and what the Russian Federation can offer is a question.
        2. Dur_mod 19 February 2020 15: 36 New
          • 1
          • 7
          -6
          You are mistaken and stubborn Russian patriots with you too. Little Russia is a term for Russians in Russia, try to say Little Russia in Ukraine, they won’t understand you at least - did you hit an oak tree? Right now, a new concept - ragulivschina from the zapadensky word ragul, denotes a cunning and greedy, poorly educated villager or a resident of the city, behaving inappropriately, no matter where he came from.
          1. Fishery 19 February 2020 16: 48 New
            • 0
            • 4
            -4
            Many terms, who are these Cherkasy remember?
          2. Aleksandr1971 19 February 2020 16: 53 New
            • 5
            • 3
            +2
            "Russian" is a term denoting all the Eastern Slavs: Great Russians, Little Russians and Belorussians. Just with the hard hand of Lenin, who called the Great Russians great-power chauvinists, in our historical science, after the Bolsheviks came to power, it became embarrassing to use the term "Great Russian". And the term "Russian" narrowed down and migrated to the Great Russians alone. And the term "Ukrainian" of Polish origin began to replace the term "Little Russia" also from the beginning of the 20th century and also for political reasons.
            Although the term "Ukraine" has been widely used since the beginning of the 19th century, it meant only part of the territory of Russia, and not a place inhabited by Ukrainians. After the collapse of the USSR, new national mythologies arose. And now in Ukraine it is not customary to recall its former name Little Russia and its former national identity as Russian people.
      2. Xnumx vis 19 February 2020 14: 45 New
        • 4
        • 2
        +2
        Quote: Tonya
        and to whom to divide, enlighten?

        I am sure you yourself know the answer! The lands of the former Austro Hungary will depart according to Hungary. Romania. Slovakia ... ... The Poles will pluck .. The New Russia and the lands of the Don Army, Slobozhanshchina will go to Russia. It will remain from Ukraine a soapy shish with oil and a muzzle with poppy seeds ...
        1. Dur_mod 19 February 2020 15: 30 New
          • 1
          • 8
          -7
          Your wet dreams will remain dreams, is it also interesting for me to sho Don lands to land in Ukraine? Can we move to the Kuban?
          1. Xnumx vis 19 February 2020 15: 44 New
            • 8
            • 1
            +7
            Quote: Dur_mod
            sho for the land Don troops were in Ukraine

            Shaw, sho .. That no sho! Do not pretend to be moronic! Voroshilovgrad-Lugansk On November 14, 1795 Empress Catherine II issued a decree on the creation of a large iron foundry. It became the first iron foundry in the south of the empire. The date of the decree on the erection of the plant is considered to be the date of foundation of Lugansk., Donetsk (Ukrainian. Donetsk; Yuzovka in 1869-1924, Stalin in 1924-1929, Stalin in 1929-1961) Land development in the Donetsk and Lugansk region was started by the Cossacks of the Don Army .. .Yes and of course AT ukrainian soapy!
            1. Dur_mod 19 February 2020 16: 07 New
              • 2
              • 9
              -7
              But the Kuban began to develop the Zaporozhye Cossacks, then return it to their homeland in Ukraine.
              Your
              And of course SOAPY ON UKRAINE!
              I leave you as an example of extreme degree of ragulism.
              Interestingly, do you know how to spell and read in transcription?
              1. Xnumx vis 19 February 2020 19: 20 New
                • 3
                • 1
                +2
                Quote: Dur_mod
                Interestingly, do you know how to spell and read in transcription?

                But I'm not interested soldier ... For 23 years I heard a lot of the sound of the "new mobs" and I saw enough of the smacking guys and the marvels marching under the flags of the Bandera wassat through the streets of my city ..., now it makes me sick and turns up from a single word with the sound of the nightingale am Glory to the Sevastopolites, Crimeans and Russia that Sevastopol is not Ukraine!
                And before, before Ukraine, I loved the Ukrainian language, songs .... hi about "twirling" the Kuban with the Kuban Cossacks IN UKRAINE .... Offer it to the Kuban Cossacks! Descendants of the proud Cossacks! I would not risk my health!
                1. Dur_mod 19 February 2020 22: 37 New
                  • 1
                  • 3
                  -2
                  You clearly have mental problems, since you are stubbornly instead of the Ukrainian letter ї persistently insert s. Trying to distort my tongue does not honor you, you are the same as the raguli whom you despise.
                  Everyone chooses his own path.
                  1. Xnumx vis 19 February 2020 23: 42 New
                    • 2
                    • 1
                    +1
                    Quote: Dur_mod
                    Everyone chooses his own path.

                    You are right, everyone chooses his own path ... Until Ukraine becomes Ukraine I can not respect!
              2. Victorio 20 February 2020 16: 03 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                Quote: Dur_mod
                А Kuban began to develop the Zaporozhye Cossacks, then bring her home to Ukraine.
                Your
                And of course SOAPY ON UKRAINE!
                I leave you as an example of extreme degree of ragulism.
                Interestingly, do you know how to spell and read in transcription?

                ====
                the liquidation / abolition (with subsequent resettlement / resettlement, etc.) of the Zaporizhzhya Sich occurred at the end of the 18th century, when the resettlement and settlements of Don and other residents of central Russia in the Kuban began as early as the end of the 17th century.
      3. Alex Nevs 19 February 2020 17: 00 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Yugoslavia, Libya, etc. ...to help
  • Kerensky 19 February 2020 14: 37 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    The leader is not there. Though for the collapse with the subsequent unification. Let odious, radical, with a "bad credit history", but popular.
    The one who says: “But we won’t pay the tax on the war! But we’ll shoot every“ buyer of land ”as soon as we see him on our fields ... But we’ll bring 5% of amber into our treasury, not the“ roof ” "half ..."
    Avakov is still quieter than water, although there are "large battalions" behind him.
    1. Kronos 19 February 2020 22: 31 New
      • 1
      • 2
      -1
      So in and in Russia there is no one who would say we will not raise taxes and pension growth
      1. Kerensky 19 February 2020 23: 52 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        So in and in Russia there is no such

        In Russia, there is a leader. But we are not talking about Russia here.
        But in Ukraine there is a problem. We’ve already gone to Europe; it won’t take a second ride. How to attract people? The one that is closer to his specific pocket.
        1. Kronos 19 February 2020 23: 53 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          Which leader is Putin? So he is the same Zelensky only there for the Ukrainian oligarchs and he is for the Russian
          1. Kerensky 20 February 2020 00: 00 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            I do not compare Putin with Zelensky. I say to the Ukrainian people: Do at least something!
            1. Kronos 20 February 2020 00: 08 New
              • 1
              • 1
              0
              I understand that it’s not easy with elections people wanted to change but it didn’t
              1. Kerensky 20 February 2020 00: 20 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                people wanted to change the election but failed

                And it won’t work out. Democratic elections are possible in policies with a population of up to 500 citizens. The level of choice of board on the collective farm.
                But Nestor Ivanovich possessed ... possessed yes. In similar hard times he created, directed and defended ... And without any Internet.
                1. Kronos 20 February 2020 00: 22 New
                  • 0
                  • 1
                  -1
                  Well now it’s a bit more complicated, you don’t agree and everything can easily sit down or disappear, they can kill. for the power of the nationalists is strong
                  1. Kerensky 20 February 2020 00: 34 New
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    0
                    for the power of the nationalists is strong

                    Not at all. Nationalists discredited themselves. The very idea of ​​nationalism is vicious in such a situation, for it is called upon to protect its prosperous little world.
                    And if he is not, then it is useless to appeal to the greatness of the ancestors.
                    As one smart person said: "Muscovites are better than others just because their parents moved to Moscow before they were born."
                    Nationalists are still in the minority. There is a good film "Seven Samurai" (?), Still black and white. It was removed after the war in order to revive the spirit of the Japanese. So there the peasants of the professional robbers were beaten, under the strict guidance of.
                    1. Kronos 20 February 2020 00: 35 New
                      • 1
                      • 1
                      0
                      I meant that under them everything - the military, the police, the courts. So they can hold power
                      1. Kerensky 20 February 2020 00: 51 New
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        0
                        So they can hold power

                        In large cities and not for long. Have to enter the surplus ...
                        Amber Republic defeated? Are the men surrendering to the war in the river valley? Can the Republic surrender?
                        Admittedly, the government does not control the territory by 100%, which means the process will continue. The first phase, a split into "principalities," with the inevitable second, is unification. Let not within those borders.
  • demo 19 February 2020 14: 43 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    And these sabotage will continue until the Ukrainian authorities have the political will to end the conflict.
    While the tail will twist the dog, everything will continue in the same vein.
  • stepka_razin 19 February 2020 15: 12 New
    • 6
    • 3
    +3
    Yes, it’s time for Russia to understand that it’s time to do something with Ukraine, otherwise it’s all not in our favor to end
    1. Aleksandr1971 19 February 2020 16: 10 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      it is necessary to partially bring down the top elite, and partially to bribe in order to change the foreign policy of Ukraine
  • Lamata 19 February 2020 15: 23 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    At the suggestion of Khrushchev, Crimea was annexed to Ukraine.

    On February 5, 1954, the Council of Ministers of the RSFSR adopted a resolution: "Considering the territorial gravity of the Crimean region to the Ukrainian SSR, the commonality of the economy, and close economic and cultural ties between the Crimean region and the Ukrainian SSR, the Council of Ministers of the RSFSR decides: it is advisable to transfer the Crimean region from the RSFSR to USSR ". On the same day, a meeting of the Presidium of the Supreme Council of the RSFSR was held, which satisfied the request of the government.

    On February 13, 1954, the Presidium of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine recognized the proposal to transfer Crimea as “completely appropriate" and emphasized in its resolution that this act "is a testament to the unlimited trust of the great Russian people to the Ukrainian people."

    Thus was laid the cornerstone of one of the most acute ethnic conflicts.
    1. Fishery 19 February 2020 16: 50 New
      • 1
      • 2
      -1
      problems with water and development pushed him to such a solution.
      1. Lamata 19 February 2020 17: 37 New
        • 2
        • 1
        +1
        VSSSSR problems were solved easier, they were, but were more solvable.
  • iouris 19 February 2020 15: 27 New
    • 0
    • 2
    -2
    I do not agree. Now it’s more important to sell land. And who needs territorial integrity if the land is sold? RF - successor to the USSR agrees that the land of the USSR will be sold?
    1. Mimoprohodil 19 February 2020 17: 40 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      Quote: iouris
      RF - successor to the USSR agrees that the land of the USSR will be sold?
      Yes, I agree, in the Russian Federation a free land market
  • Yrec 19 February 2020 15: 40 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    Quote: Dur_mod
    Break off, the power of idiots and creatures ruling now in Ukraine will disappear. It’s too late to hope for the collapse of Ukraine, the inhabitants of Ukraine have already formed as a nation, the memory of the generations of the 50s and 60s remains with them, the current generation does not remember the Union and there are no illusions about the brotherhood, after Crimea, no one experiences. External enemies, both from the east and from the west, will no longer be able to ruin the country, only internal.

    Ukraine from the USSR received EVERYTHING. The USSR was the most educated, the most knowledge-intensive, with the most developed industry and agricultural in the Union. Space, aviation, auto, ship, machine tool, nuclear industry. And the population is 52 million. A good starting level for the new state, isn't it? And this is ALL Ukraine received after the Second World War from the entire Soviet people, because during the Second World War everything was destroyed or evacuated. Therefore, one should not think that the Ukrainians themselves did all this. List which of the above Ukraine was able to save and increase?
    1. Dur_mod 19 February 2020 16: 14 New
      • 2
      • 6
      -4
      So no one argues with that. All the republics of the former USSR have lost a lot, as for Ukraine, then on the former achievements and memory, now you cannot build new relations with Russia. After the aggression of Russia against Ukraine in Crimea and its capture, the people of Ukraine are no longer the same, there will not be the same attitude as before, relatives, work, business will remain. But the brothers went their separate ways.
      1. Oleg Skvortsov 19 February 2020 16: 32 New
        • 7
        • 2
        +5
        What does the people have to do with it? Half of the "Ukrainian" people have gastritis wherever possible and impossible, and they wanted to spit on Ukraine. Who was Russian will remain Russian. Well, someone likes to be a political Ukrainian - that’s his problem. Crimea was, is and will be Russian - Russian blood was shed there, you need to learn history, and not listen to talk shows about wringing. But Donbass said all this to Western women and put an end to it.
      2. Igor Aviator 19 February 2020 17: 37 New
        • 7
        • 2
        +5
        [quote = Dur_mod] After the aggression of Russia against Ukraine in the Crimea and its capture, [/ quote]
        Well to
        Oh, come on. enlighten, what is such an “aggression"? How many people died as a result of this "aggression"? How many enterprises, significant objects of infrastructure and culture were destroyed as a result of "aggression"? What kind of aggression is this when nobody died, nothing is destroyed? and where were “valiant APUs when this“ aggression ”took place? Silently, like mice under a broom, sat and didn’t shine? My dear, would you even lie to yourself, it’s useless to lie to us! Crimea from you, vicious raguli, zombies, and the same brainless, GONE MYSELF! and "polite people" simply did not allow you, ruguli, to stop this! Moreover, mind you, WITHOUT a single shot, and without the use of force! So, now it’s not worth it to howl at the fact that YOURSELF has fallen off, YOUR fault! By the way. Donbass and Slobodanism will “fall off” soon, then - the Kherson region with Odessa, and only then - the right-bank Dnieper region with Zaporozhye! Hungary is chopping off your Carpathian region .. Lviv and the region are Poland. So soon you will have only one Galicia -groustest, which no one needs! Then you will "panic"!
        1. Dur_mod 19 February 2020 19: 06 New
          • 2
          • 5
          -3
          Tell us about your lamentations "he left" in the UN Security Council and other countries of the world, who voted and recognized that it Aggression of Russia, the whole world is fools, and only zombie Russians believe in
          GONE HIMSELF! and "polite people" simply did not allow you, ruguli, to stop this! Moreover, mind you, WITHOUT a single shot, and without the use of force! So, now it’s not worth it to howl at the fact that YOURSELF has fallen off, YOUR fault!

          Our fault was that we did not shoot the “brothers”. I repeat once again for the stubborn, to take advantage of the situation when a neighbor has trouble, only the Russians, with their capture of the Crimea, who solved their geopolitical tasks, could. And your fairy tales and horror stories are only for internal use in Russia. The whole world has condemned your aggression and your verbiage only for Russians in Russia.
    2. Looking for 19 February 2020 18: 21 New
      • 2
      • 2
      0
      Well, the Russian Federation is also not far gone in preserving and enhancing the Soviet "heritage"
  • Aleksandr1971 19 February 2020 16: 08 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    the current Ukrainian authorities will not have the political will to end the conflict because Washington will not allow them. Ukrainian power must be changed through a pro-Russian coup. If the West held an anti-Russian coup there in 2014, then why not do the same there
  • Vladimir61 19 February 2020 16: 30 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Indeed, even if we assume that everything was so, the question immediately arises: how did it turn out that in the area of ​​the separation of forces and equipment there were Ukrainian military personnel who “stopped the attack”? .. After all, by all agreements, they had to be a few kilometers from the demarcation line.
    Moreover, ukrovoyaka was killed not a few km from the contact line, but in front of the militia positions, from where his corpse was evacuated, by the forces of the LPR People’s Opposition! How did he end up there, maybe the wind brought it?
  • Alexfly 19 February 2020 18: 00 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The sudden collapse of the USSR entailed all territorial, interethnic problems. Addressing these issues will require decades. And everything will return to square one ...
  • Looking for 19 February 2020 18: 13 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Quote: Svarog
    but also 40 ml .. of the population, which is carefully set against us ..

    Moreover, from kindergarten age. Rusophobia is the official policy of the Kiev government.
  • Andobor 19 February 2020 21: 12 New
    • 4
    • 4
    0
    Yes, Russia will not allow sawing Ukraine, Russia needs all of Ukraine - all without Americans,
    - It will do even without the Ukrainians, - but this is their problem.
  • Sapsan136 19 February 2020 22: 38 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    This is the mistake of those who undertook to steer the policy of the Russian Federation in Ukraine ... It remains only to understand whether this is stupidity or deliberate wrecking of the interests of the Russian Federation ... Shouting that Russian regions will somehow influence Bandera’s, and most of them can only very stupid, or very deceitful ... Ukrainization of the population continues, and this is against the interests of Russia, since here it is no longer Ukrainians, but Russians are turned into Ukrainians and set against Russians and Russia ... Here one of two things - Either Russia will return the Russian regions under their own flag now, or in a dozen years they will lose them completely ... they simply assimilate, through the influence of Bandera propaganda and Bandera education on youth
  • Karaul14 20 February 2020 04: 32 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    Russia acted as a guarantor in the Budapest memorandum, but essentially took away Crimea - the territory that it previously recognized as the territory of Ukraine.
    Back in 2011, they said that a threat to the territorial integrity of Ukraine came from the Black Sea Fleet base, but they did not listen and extended the lease term for the base.
    1. Aleksandr1971 20 February 2020 16: 30 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      There is an analogy with Israel. In 1947, British Palestine was divided into Israel and Arab Palestine. Both new countries had to respect each other's sovereignty and territorial integrity. And the USA, Britain and the USSR are guarantors of their mutual inviolability. Warranties did not last long - less than a year. And in 2018, the United States even recognized the capture of Israel. Whatever you say, but when international treaties interfere, they can be violated.